Tracking List: MAC 2026 - Assessment

HB1759 - Rep. Mike McGirl (R) - Modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments
Summary: Currently, personal property is assessed at 33.3% of its true value in money as of January 1st of each calendar year. Beginning January 1, 2027, personal property must be assessed at 30% of its true value in money.

This bill is similar to HB 629 (2025).
Citations: 137.115
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/03/2026 

Bill History:
02/03/2026 

01/29/2026 

01/13/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/09/2026 

01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB1766 - Rep. Mike McGirl (R) - Modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 9 to 5.

Currently, local county assessors determine the value of new construction and improvements of both real and personal property by maintaining a yearly record of increases in valuation for each political subdivision in the county that results from new construction or improvements. The aggregate increase in valuation of personal property for the current year over that of the previous year is the equivalent of the new construction and improvements factor for personal property.

Beginning January 1, 2027, any increase in the aggregate valuation of personal property for the current year over that of the previous year can not be counted as new construction.

This bill is similar to HB 629 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will make valuations fairer for taxpayers by limiting personal property to CPI or the Hancock limitations. Currently, the real estate levy calculation does not include personal property. By including personal property in the levy calculation, supporters say the bill links personal property to CPI or Hancock limitations.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative McGirl; and Ray Mccarty, Associated Industries of Missouri.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that property levies are based on the total assessed value, and that calculation does not include new construction or the growth in personal property. This bill includes the mathematical differences from growth in personal property valuation and makes the Hancock limitations more effective.

Testifying in person on the bill was Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessors' Association.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.073
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
01/29/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

Bill History:
01/29/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

01/29/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative


01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

01/22/2026 

01/20/2026 

01/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/21/26 - 12:00 pm - Joint Committee Room (Room 117) - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


01/13/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/09/2026 

01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB1768 - Rep. Chris Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property used for short-term rentals
Summary: Currently, real property is divided into three separate classifications based on the use or purpose of the property. Each of the subclassifications of property are assessed at different rates. When real property is used for different purposes resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money of the property devoted to each use.

This bill provides that when a single family home that is owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC) is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, the home will be classified as residential property and will not necessarily be considered "transient housing".

This bill is similar to SCS HB 1086 (2025) and SCS HB 1086 (2025).
Citations: 137.016
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/06/2026 

Bill History:
02/06/2026 

01/29/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB1800 - Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R) - Changes the percentage of the cap on the inflationary growth factor for the assessment growth of real or personal property occurring within a political subdivision
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Tax Reform by a vote of 6 to 3.

This bill modifies the manner in which a political subdivision can revise each tax levy to allow for inflationary assessment growth for all subclasses of real and personal property.

Currently, the inflationary growth factor for any subclass of real and personal property is limited to the actual assessment growth, exclusive of new construction and improvements, but not to exceed the Consumer Price Index, or 5%, whichever is lower.

This bill limits the inflationary growth factor for any subclass of real or personal property to the actual assessment growth, but not to exceed the lower of the following:

(1) The Consumer Price Index; or

(2) The following percentages:

(a) For tax levy revisions before January 1, 2027, 5%; or

(b) For tax levy revisions on or after January 1, 2027, 3%.

This bill is similar to HB 517 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that new revenue that can currently be gained by government institutions is limited to 5% or CPI. This bill will limit the growth of new tax dollars being pulled from taxpayers' wallets to 3% or CPI. Supporters say this reduced limit would have saved taxpayers money 17 times over the last 40 years. Those in support of the bill also say this bill will provide a safe harbor for taxpayers across Missouri.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Matthiesen; and Matthew Smith, Associated Industries of Missouri;

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.073
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

Bill History:
02/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/09/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative


01/29/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

01/22/2026 

01/22/2026 

01/20/2026 

01/15/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/13/2026 

01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB1892 - Rep. Wendy Hausman (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments of certain stationary property
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 6 to 3.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1892.

Beginning January 1, 2027, the provisions of current law relating to depreciable tangible personal property will apply to all real property, placed in service at any time, that is stationary property used for transportation or storage of liquid and gaseous products, including water, sewage, and natural gas that is not propane or LP gas, but not including petroleum products.

The county assessor must estimate the value of the stationary property by applying the 20-year depreciation table provided in the bill to the original cost of the property.

Taxpayers who own such stationary property must provide the assessor, on or before May 1 of the applicable tax years, with the original cost and the year placed in service. The information will be summarized in a format specified in the bill. Upon request by a taxpayer, the assessor will provide the taxpayer with certain information specified in the bill.

This bill is similar to HB 531 (2025).



The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill will provide clarity for assessors and predictability for taxpayers. Currently, most counties depreciate pipelines on a 20-year schedule, and only a few counties do so on a different schedule. Supporters say this bill will provide consistency across counties.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hausman; Associated Industries of Missouri; Summit Utilities, Inc.; Empire District Liberty Utilities Central; Missouri American Water; Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry; Missouri Natural Gas Association; Spire Inc.; and Missouri Energy Development Association. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the bill will cause counties to lose substantial revenue. Those in opposition also state that the bill is based on a form from the State Tax Commission from 2014 that uses a 20-year depreciation schedule. However, that form has since then been revised to reflect a 50- year depreciation schedule.

Testifying in person against the bill were Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association; Jeff Porter, Missouri State Assessor's Association.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.122
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

Bill History:
02/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

01/21/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Ways and Means

01/20/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Ways and Means

01/15/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/20/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Ways and Means, HR 6

01/12/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means

01/08/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/12/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Ways and Means, HR 5

01/08/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Ways and Means

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2060 - Rep. Jeff Vernetti (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property used for short-term rentals
Summary: Currently, real property is divided into three separate classifications based on the use or purpose of the property. Each of the subclassifications of property are assessed at different rates. When real property is used for different purposes resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money of the property devoted to each use.

This bill provides that when a single family home is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, such a home will be classified as residential property and will not be considered transient housing.



This bill is similar to HB 1086 (2025) and HB 1086 (2025).
Citations: 137.016
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/06/2026 

Bill History:
02/06/2026 

01/29/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2098 - Rep. Michael Davis (R) - Modifies provisions governing the classification of real property
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 9 to 1.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2098.

This bill adds recreational areas used for noncommercial leisure or aesthetic purposes to the definition of residential, as that definition relates to the subclassification of real property for taxation purposes.

The bill provides that when a single-family home that is owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC) is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, the home will be classified as residential property and will not necessarily be considered "transient housing".

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will ensure green spaces are taxed at lower rates. Supporters further say the bill also reclassifies golf courses, nature preserves, and other similar spaces to a classification that is a more appropriate subclass of real property.

Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Davis.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that reclassifying these green spaces as agriculture goes against the purpose of agricultural land as defined in law.

Testifying in person against the bill were Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association; and Jeff Porter, Missouri State Assessor's Association.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.016
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/02/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Ways and Means

Bill History:
02/02/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Ways and Means

01/29/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Ways and Means

01/27/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/29/2026, 10:30 AM - House - Ways and Means, HR 1

01/25/2026 
H - Committee hearing cancelled - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

01/22/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

01/22/2026 

01/12/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means

01/08/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/12/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Ways and Means, HR 5

01/08/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Ways and Means

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/02/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2178 - Rep. Chad Perkins (R) - Modifies provisions governing the taxation of property
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 14 to 4.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2178.

The bill provides that when a valuation of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, and other real properties is made by a computer, computer-assisted method, or a computer program, the burden of proof to sustain the valuation must be on the assessor at any hearing or appeal.

This bill requires the assessor to conduct a physical inspection of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property before the assessor can increase the assessed valuation of such parcel of real property by more than 15%.

If any appeals case arising from general reassessment of a property whose assessed valuation increased by at least 15% is not heard and acted upon by the board of equalization by September 30th of an applicable year, the following must occur:

(1) The case must be dismissed;

(2) The assessor?s increased assessed valuation must be voided; and

(3) The previous assessed valuation must be applied instead of the increased assessed valuation. If an assessor fails to provide sufficient evidence to prove a physical inspection was performed in an appeal, the assessor?s increased assessed valuation must be voided and the previous assessed valuation must be applied instead of the increased assessed valuation.

If a taxpayer submits a written appraisal report prepared by a certified Missouri appraiser to the board of equalization at least five days prior to the scheduled hearing date, the value of the property provided in the certified appraiser?s report must be the property?s presumptive true value in money.

When the State Tax Commission (STC) equalizes the valuation of a class or subclass of property that results in an increase of more than 15%, the increase must be evenly divided between the next reassessment cycles to ensure no single year causes an increase that is greater than 15%.

If an assessor appeals certain decisions of the STC to a court and the taxpayer prevails, the taxpayer must be awarded costs of appeal and reasonable attorney?s fees.



The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill makes the valuation and taxation of parcels in subclass (3) fairer, more transparent, and more predictable. Those in support say the bill would ensure commercial properties are treated in a manner similar to residential property. This bill also helps businesses, particularly small businesses, to plan for future increases when they know those increases are coming.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Perkins; BB63, LLC; Grandview Road III, LLC; and Vincent H. Rigby, Jr.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that people are wanting decreases in their taxes, and this bill doesn?t mention tax liability decreases at all. Those in opposition say this bill allows computer-assisted technologies for commercial assessments, which has caused issues in the past.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.115, 138.010, 138.060, 138.390, 138.430
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

Bill History:
02/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/09/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative


01/29/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

01/22/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/20/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/21/26 - 12:00 pm - Joint Committee Room (Room 117) - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


01/13/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/09/2026 

01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/04/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2329 - Rep. Richard West (R) - Reduces the assessment percentage of tangible personal property over a period of years
Summary: This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the percentage of the true value in money at which personal property is assessed will be reduced over a period of three years until it will be assessed at 18% of its true value in money.

This bill is similar to HB 903 (2025).
Citations: 137.115
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/09/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means

Bill History:
02/09/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means

02/05/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/09/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Ways and Means, HR 5

01/25/2026 
H - Committee hearing cancelled - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

01/22/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

01/22/2026 

01/15/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Ways and Means

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/10/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2402 - Rep. Danny Busick (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Summary: Currently, the definition of "tangible personal property", for the purposes of property taxation, includes solar panels, racking systems, inverters, and related solar equipment, components, materials, and supplies installed in connection with solar photovoltaic energy systems that were constructed and producing solar energy prior to August 9, 2022. This subclass of tangible personal property is assessed at five percent of its true value in money. This bill removes the limitation that the property must be constructed and producing energy prior to August 9, 2022.

Currently, where real property is used for more than one purpose resulting in different classifications, the county Assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money for the property devoted to each use. This bill specifies that any property classified as agricultural property that is used for the purpose of energy production activities for resale must be proportionally calculated, assessed, and reclassified as commercial property.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $2,500 per megawatt of nameplate capacity. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property. This does not prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or certain abatement agreements, and it does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100, RSMo.

Beginning January 1, 2027, land associated with a solar energy project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity in excess of five megawatts must be classified as subclass (3) real property and assessed as commercial property. This bill also provides that, for certain public utility companies that have a solar energy project, the solar energy project must be assessed using a specific methodology. This does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

The bill also provides that for real or tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy to generate electricity, including equipment used to support the integration of a solar generation asset into an existing system, must be valued and taxed by local authorities. This does not apply to certain photovoltaic energy systems or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

This bill provides that a county commission can choose to opt-in to the provision that limits the total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in the county to 4% of all cropland in the county or less. Acres owned by utilities or electrical corporations must not be included in the 4% county calculation. The acreage is determined by the perimeter of the actual solar panels. County commissions choosing to adopt the 4% limit option must have procedures and a severability clause in those procedures.

For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks specified in the bill as measured from the nearest occupied dwelling, church, or school to the perimeter of the nearest solar panel. This setback must not apply to an official agreement between the project and the property owner. This setback does not apply to solar energy projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2025, or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project.

This bill is the similar to HCS HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).
Citations: 137.010, 137.016, 137.080, 137.115, 137.124, 153.030, 153.034, 393.1120
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

Bill History:
02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

01/30/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Utilities

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/15/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2415 - Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R) - Establishes a definition of "assessment value" for real property assessment purposes
Summary: This bill provides a definition for "assessment value" as it relates to real property assessment purposes.

The bill provides that when "assessed valuation", "assessed value", "free market value", "market value", "property values", "true value in money", and "value" are used as they relate to real property assessment purposes, they must be construed to refer to: "assessment value" as defined in the bill.
Citations: 137.016
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Bill History:
02/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/29/2026 

01/15/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/15/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2651 - Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R) - Modifies provisions governing local property tax ballot questions, real property assessments, and property tax levies
Summary: Currently, certain counties, cities, political subdivisions, or other taxing districts can propose the imposition, continuation, modification, or elimination of a property tax to the voters at certain times of the year. This bill provides that these proposals must be submitted to the voters at the general election in November.

This bill provides that new construction and improvements will no longer be excluded from the aggregate assessed valuation calculation, as it relates to the Hancock Amendment, setting real property tax levies, inflationary assessment growth, and adjusted tax rate ceilings.

Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase can levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate.

The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate.

Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline.

As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces such language with that relating to multiple tax rates.

Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt-out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of HB 1150 (2002), and certain provisions of SB 960, which include setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county can also opt-out of implementing certain provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes.

This bill repeals the references to the provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and SB 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt-out of or to implement such provisions.

The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate.
Citations: 137.037, 137.055, 137.065, 137.073, 137.079, 137.082, 137.115, 137.565, 137.570, 137.1040, 137.1050, 162.223, 162.441, 162.840, 164.021, 164.151, 167.231, 178.881, 182.010, 182.015, 182.020, 182.030, 182.100, 182.140, 182.650, 182.655, 182.715, 182.717, 184.350, 184.351, 184.353, 184.357, 184.359, 184.600, 184.604, 184.614, 190.040, 190.065, 190.074, 190.296, 198.260, 198.263, 198.310, 204.250, 205.563, 205.979, 206.070, 206.120, 210.860, 233.172, 233.200, 233.345, 233.455, 233.460, 233.510, 235.175, 238.232, 247.130, 247.350, 247.470, 249.110, 249.929, 249.1106, 249.1150, 250.060, 256.445, 257.370, 262.598, 263.452, 263.472, 321.225, 321.240, 321.241, 321.243, 321.244, 321.460, 321.610, 321.620, 650.399, 650.408, 66.265, 67.799, 67.990, 67.1422, 67.1531, 67.1551, 67.1880, 67.457, 68.235, 68.250, 71.800, 71.802, 80.460, 90.500, 92.010, 92.031, 92.035, 94.060, 94.070, 94.250, 94.260, 94.340, 94.350, 94.400, 95.150, 95.390
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/06/2026 

Bill History:
02/06/2026 

01/15/2026 

01/15/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

01/02/2026 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2671 - Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R) - Modifies provisions governing the assessment and taxation of property
Summary: Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase can levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate.

The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate.

Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate.

This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline.

As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces such language with that relating to multiple tax rates.

Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt-out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county can also opt-out of implementing certain provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes.

This bill repeals the references to the provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and SB 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt-out of or to implement such provisions.

The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county to determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate.
Citations: 137.073, 137.079, 137.115
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/03/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Bill History:
02/03/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/29/2026 

01/29/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/29/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/29/26 - 10:30 am or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/27/2026 

01/26/2026 
H - Committee hearing cancelled - 1/27/26 - 12:00 pm - HR 6 - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


01/15/2026 

01/15/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

01/05/2026 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2711 - Rep. Dane Diehl (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the assessment of certain broadband communications equipment
Summary: This bill adds machinery and equipment used to provide broadband communications service to the definition of "tangible personal property" for the purposes of property taxation. The bill also creates a new subclass of tangible personal property that includes machinery and equipment used to provide broadband communications service, such property will be assessed at 12% of its true value in money.

This bill is similar to SB 1202 (2026).
Citations: 137.010, 137.080, 137.115
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

Bill History:
02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

01/30/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Utilities

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

01/06/2026 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2816 - Rep. Kent Haden (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Summary: Currently, the definition of "tangible personal property", for the purposes of property taxation, includes solar panels, racking systems, inverters, and related solar equipment, components, materials, and supplies installed in connection with solar photovoltaic energy systems that were constructed and producing solar energy prior to August 9, 2022. This subclass of tangible personal property is assessed at five percent of its true value in money. This bill removes the limitation that the property must be constructed and producing energy prior to August 9, 2022.

Currently, where real property is used for more than one purpose resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money for the property devoted to each use. This bill specifies that any property classified as agricultural property that is used for the purpose of energy production activities for resale must be proportionally calculated, assessed, and reclassified as commercial property.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $2,500 per megawatt of nameplate capacity and adjusted annually for inflation. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property. This does not prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or certain abatement agreements, and it does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100, RSMo.

Beginning January 1, 2027, land associated with a solar energy project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity in excess of five megawatts must be classified as subclass (3) real property and assessed as commercial property. This bill also provides that, for certain public utility companies that have a solar energy project, the solar energy project must be assessed using a specific methodology. This does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

The bill also provides that for real or tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy to generate electricity, including equipment used to support the integration of a solar generation asset into an existing system, must be valued and taxed by local authorities. This does not apply to certain photovoltaic energy systems or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

This bill provides that a county commission can choose to opt-in, upon a majority vote, to the provision that limits the total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in the county to four percent of all cropland in the county or less. Acres owned by utilities or electrical corporations must not be included in the four percent county calculation. The acreage is determined by the perimeter of the actual solar panels. County commissions choosing to adopt the four percent limit option must have procedures and a severability clause in those procedures.

For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks specified in the bill as measured from the nearest occupied dwelling, church, or school to the perimeter of the nearest solar panel. This setback must not apply to an official agreement between the project and the property owner. This setback does not apply to solar energy projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2025, or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project.

This bill is the similar to HB 2402 (2026) and HCS HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).
Citations: 137.010, 137.016, 137.080, 137.115, 137.124, 153.030, 153.034, 393.1120
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

Bill History:
02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

01/30/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Utilities

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB2923 - Rep. Carolyn Caton (R) - Establishes the "Homestead Improvement Property Tax Relief Act" exempting qualifying improvements to a homestead from real property taxation
Citations: 137.115, 137.1081
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
01/13/2026 
H - Read Second Time

Bill History:
01/13/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/12/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB2946 - Rep. Richard West (R) - Reduces the assessment percentage of tangible personal property over a period of years
Citations: 137.115
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
01/14/2026 
H - Read Second Time

Bill History:
01/14/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/13/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3035 - Rep. Rodger Reedy (R) - Modifies provisions relating to motor vehicle assessment valuations
Summary: Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill requires the assessor to use the manufacturer?s suggested retail price (MSRP) for all manufactured motor vehicles to determine the original value in money of all motor vehicle assessment valuations.

The bill provides a 12-year depreciation schedule that must be applied to each MSRP to develop the annual and historical valuation guide for all motor vehicles. Each year, these values must be delivered to each approved software vendor by November 15th and listed for use in the next assessment year by December 15th.

If there is no listing available from an approved publication for a particular motor vehicle, the assessor must:

(1) Use information or publications that fairly estimate the original value of the motor vehicle; and

(2) Apply the depreciation schedule as provided in the bill.

The State Tax Commission (STC) must secure an annual appropriation for the guide and the programming needed to allow valuations by the vehicle identification number in all certified mass appraisal software systems. The STC or the state must be responsible for renewals and annual software cost for preparing the data in a usable format for approved software vendors.
Citations: 137.115
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/05/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

Bill History:
02/05/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/03/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing

02/03/2026 

01/29/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

01/27/2026 

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

01/20/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3164 - Rep. Rodger Reedy (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the duties of the state tax commission
Citations: 138.390
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/03/2026 
H - Read Second Time

Bill History:
02/03/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/02/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3171 - Rep. Richard West (R) - Repeals provisions relating to certain penalties for failure to deliver personal property lists
Citations: 137.280, 50.1020
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/04/2026 
H - Read Second Time

Bill History:
02/04/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/03/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3200 - Rep. Bruce Sassmann (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the modernization of certain property assessment practices
Citations: 137.115, 137.180, 137.355, 137.490, 137.121
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/05/2026 
H - Read Second Time

Bill History:
02/05/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/04/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HJR171 - Rep. Bill Falkner (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing school districts to include municipal property owned for industrial project purposes in calculations of assessed valuation for school district indebtedness purposes
Summary: This joint resolution if adopted would amend Article VI of the Missouri Constitution to allow school districts to include specific tax exempted property used for industrial development in the calculation of assessed valuation for determining the limitation cap on school district indebtedness.
Citations: ART VI.SEC 26(b)
Progress: House: Filed
Last Action:
02/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-General Laws

Bill History:
02/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-General Laws

02/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-General Laws

01/22/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/21/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

SB853 - Sen. Brian Williams (D) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Summary: SB 853 - Current law requires a county assessor to provide notification to a taxpayer by no later than June 15 if the assessor increases the taxpayer's real property valuation. This act requires such notice to be provided by no later than June 1. (Section 137.180)

Additionally, current law requires a taxpayer to file an appeal of the taxpayer's assessed valuation by no later than the second Monday in July. This act requires such appeal to be filed by no later than the first Monday in August. (Sections 137.275 to 138.180)

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.180, 137.275, 137.385, 138.180
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:

01/08/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB987 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to erroneous property classifications
Summary: SB 987 - Current law provides that a taxpayer shall be awarded costs and reasonable attorney's fees for any appeal of an assessor's classification of real property that is found by the State Tax Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction to be an erroneous classification. This act provides that any such decision shall include the recovery of such costs.

The act provides that any taxpayer not receiving such costs and fees derived from any decision made on or after January 1, 2024, shall have a cause of action against the assessor to recover such costs and fees, as well as the costs and fees associated with initiating such cause of action. Such taxpayer shall also be entitled to recover damages in an amount equal to ten percent of the original assessed value of the property that was erroneously classified.

This act is identical to SCS/SB 759 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 138.430
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
01/21/2026 

Bill History:
01/21/2026 

01/14/2026 

01/12/2026 

01/08/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

01/08/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1066 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property
Summary: SB 1066 - This act modifies the definition of "residential property" for the purposes of the taxation of real property by providing that such definition shall include single family homes that are leased, in whole or in part, for a term of less than thirty consecutive days.

This act is identical to SB 699 (2025), SB 784 (2025), and HB 1086 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.016
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
02/09/2026 

Bill History:
02/09/2026 


01/27/2026 
S - Re-referred to committee - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions


01/15/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1088 - Sen. Maggie Nurrenbern (D) - Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property
Summary: SB 1088 - This act modifies the definition of "residential property" for the purposes of the taxation of real property by providing that such definition shall include single family homes that are owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company and leased, in whole or in part, for a term of less than thirty consecutive days.

This act is identical to SCS/HB 1086 (2025) and is substantially similar to SB 699 (2025) and SB 784 (2025), and to a provision in HB 660 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.016
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
02/09/2026 

Bill History:
02/09/2026 


01/27/2026 
S - Re-referred to committee - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions


01/15/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1118 - Sen. Travis Fitzwater (R) - Modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments
Summary: SB 1118 - This act modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments.

PERSONAL PROPERTY NEW CONSTRUCTION

For the purposes of calculating the amount of assessed valuation of personal property, current law provides that the definition of new construction and improvements is the aggregate increase in valuation of personal property for the current year over that of the previous year. This act provides that, beginning January 1, 2028, new construction and improvements shall not include increases in the aggregate assessed valuation of personal property. (Section 137.073)

This provision is substantially similar to SB 409 (2023) and HB 754 (2023).

PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT RATE

Current law requires personal property to be assessed at 33.3% of its true value in money. This act reduces such assessment rate to 30%. (Section 137.115.1)

This act is substantially similar to SB 264 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.073, 137.115
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
01/15/2026 

Bill History:
01/15/2026 

01/15/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1202 - Sen. Brad Hudson (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the assessment of certain broadband communications equipment
Summary: SB 1202 - This act provides that the definition of "tangible personal property" shall, for the purposes of property taxation, include machinery and equipment used to provide broadband communications service, as described in the act. (Section 137.010)

This act also creates a new subclass of tangible personal property that includes machinery and equipment used to provide broadband communications service and that is placed in service on or after August 28, 2026. All such property shall be assessed at 12% of its true value in money for the 2027-2033 calendar years, and at 33.3% of its true value in money for the 2034 and all subsequent calendar years. (Sections 137.080 and 137.115)

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.010, 137.080, 137.115
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
02/04/2026 
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws

Bill History:
02/04/2026 
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws

02/02/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 10:30 AM - Senate-General Laws, Senate Lounge

01/27/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws

01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1212 - Sen. Joe Nicola (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property assessments
Summary: SB 1212 - Current law requires assessors to assess personal property at a rate of 33.3% of true value, and residential, agricultural, and all other real property at rates of 19%, 12%, and 32%, respectively. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act requires the State Tax Commission to calculate the total assessed valuation for each subclass of real property, individually, and for personal property, in the aggregate. If such amount for a class or subclass exceeds such amount from the previous year for such class or subclass by more than the percent increase in inflation or five percent, whichever is less, the State Tax Commission shall adjust the assessment percentage for that class or subclass of property so that the total assessed value for that class or subclass does not exceed the amount from the previous year plus the allowable growth factor.

The calculations and adjustments to the assessment percentage required by the act shall be completed and submitted to each county assessor by no later than August 7 of each year. (Section 137.115)

Additionally, current law requires assessors to send the assessor's book to the county governing body by July 1 of each year. This act changes such date to June 1. Current law requires county clerks to forward an abstract of the assessment book to the State Tax Commission and to the governing body of each political subdivision by July 20 of each year. This act changes such date to June 20. (Section 137.245)

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.115, 137.245
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:
01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1301 - Sen. Rick Brattin (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the State Tax Commission's ratio studies
Summary: SB 1301 - This act provides that, in any ratio study in which the State Tax Commission evaluates the assessment ratios of the various counties, the Commission shall require that no county's ratio of assessed values is greater than one.

This act is identical to SB 795 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 138.195
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:
01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1303 - Sen. Mike Moon (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain real property
Summary: SB 1303 - This act modifies the definition of "residential property" for the purposes of the taxation of real property by providing that such definition shall include single family homes that are leased, in whole or in part, for a term of less than thirty consecutive days.

This act is identical to SB 699 (2025) and SB 784 (2025), and to a provision in HB 660 (2025), and is substantially similar to SCS/HB 1086 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.016
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
01/27/2026 

Bill History:
01/27/2026 

01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1517 - Sen. Brad Hudson (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Summary: SB 1517 - This act modifies provisions relating to property taxes.

TAX BALLOT MEASURE LANGUAGE

This act provides that a political subdivision or election authority shall not advertise or describe any proposed property tax as not increasing taxes unless failing to adopt the measure would cause an actual increase in the tax rate and adopting the measure would cause the tax rate to stay the same or decrease. (Section 67.496)

This act requires an election authority to label tax ballot measures numerically or alphabetically in the order in which they are submitted. (Section 115.240)

This act modifies multiple provisions of current law to provide that any ballot measures proposing a new or increased real or personal property tax levy shall be submitted on a general election day and shall include certain information, as described in the act. (Section 115.706 and multiple other sections)

LOCAL ELECTIONS

This act provides that all general elections for local, state, and national offices and issues shall be conducted on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. (Section 115.123)

PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS

This act provides that a political subdivision that adopts a tax abatement or similar economic incentive shall decrease any real property tax levy that is increased on property located in the political subdivision that does not receive an abatement. (Section 137.039)

PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS

Current law provides that new construction and improvements shall not be included in the total assessed valuation for the purposes of calculating property tax levies. This act repeals such provisions. (Sections 137.055 and 137.073)

This act requires that if the voters in a political subdivision approve an increase to the tax rate ceiling prior to the expiration of a previously approved temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling shall remain in effect only until such time as the temporary levy increase expires under the terms originally approved by a vote of the people, at which time the tax rate ceiling shall be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase.

If, prior to the expiration of a temporary levy increase, voters are asked to approve an additional permanent levy increase, voters shall be submitted ballot language that clearly indicates that if the permanent levy increase is approved, the temporary levy shall be made permanent. (Section 137.073.5(3))

This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 119 (2025), HB 660 (2025), HB 1497 (2025), HCS/HB 2058 (2024), HCS/HB 1517 (2024), HCS/HB 2140 (2024), CCS/HS/HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 96 (2023), and HCS/SS#3/SCS/SB 131 (2023), and is substantially similar to SB 880 (2018) and SB 357 (2017).

This act provides that, if the total assessed valuation in a political subdivision decreases in the tax year immediately following a tax year in which the voters approved an increase to the tax rate ceiling, such political subdivision may increase its levy such that the revenue received equals the amount that would have been received from the increased rate of levy had there been no decrease in the total assessed valuation. (Section 137.073.5(6))

This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 119 (2025), HB 660 (2025), HB 1497 (2025), HCS/HB 2058 (2024), HCS/HB 1517 (2024), and HCS/HB 2140 (2024).

Current law requires an assessor to conduct a physical inspection of any residential real property prior to increasing the assessed valuation of such property by more than 15%. This act applies such requirement to all utility, industrial, commercial, railroad and other non-agricultural real property. (Section 137.115.10)

PROPERTY TAX CREDITS

Current law allows counties to provide a property tax credit to certain seniors. This act requires counties to provide such credit and makes technical changes to the definitions of "eligible credit amount" and "eligible taxpayer". The act also requires the statement of tax due to include certain information about the proportional amount of the credit attributable to each taxing jurisdiction. Finally, the act provides that the credit shall apply to all property tax levies, including debt service levies. (Section 137.1050)

Current law also allows counties to provide a property tax credit to all other taxpayers, with certain counties able to annually increase the real property tax liability by five percent or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is greater. This act limits such increase to the lesser of the two amounts. (Section 137.1055)

TOTALED MOTOR VEHICLE PROPERTY TAX CREDIT

This act authorizes any taxing entity to provide a property tax credit to a taxpayer to reduce the total personal property tax owed on a totaled motor vehicle. The amount of the property tax credit shall be equal to the amount of property tax owed on such vehicle, prorated for the amount of months left in the tax year.

In order to authorize a property tax credit pursuant to the act, the governing body of the taxing entity shall adopt an ordinance, as described in the act. (Section 139.035)

This provision is identical to HCS/HB 708 (2025).

PROPERTY TAX INSTALLMENTS

Current law authorizes counties to provide for the payment of real and personal property taxes in installments, but excludes township counties from utilizing such payment plans. This act repeals such prohibition for township counties. (Section 139.053)

This provision is identical to SB 1211 (2026) and HB 388 (2025).

SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX LEVIES

Current law requires school districts to impose a property tax levy for operating purposes of not less than $2.75 in order to receive the full amount of state aid. This act lowers such required levy to $1.50 beginning with the 2026-2027 school year. (Section 163.021)

BLIND PENSION FUND

Current law imposes a state property tax of $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation for the purposes of funding the Blind Pension Fund. This act eliminates such property tax upon the adoption of a constitutional amendment requiring the General Assembly to appropriate moneys to the Blind Pension Fund. (Section 209.130)

SEVERABILITY

This act contains a severability clause. (Section B)

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 115.123, 115.240, 115.706, 137.016, 137.037, 137.055, 137.065, 137.073, 137.082, 137.115, 137.565, 137.570, 137.1040, 137.1050, 137.1055, 137.039, 139.053, 139.035, 162.441, 162.840, 163.021, 164.021, 164.151, 167.231, 178.881, 182.010, 182.015, 182.020, 182.030, 182.100, 182.140, 182.650, 182.655, 182.715, 182.717, 184.350, 184.351, 184.353, 184.357, 184.359, 184.600, 184.604, 184.614, 190.040, 190.065, 190.074, 190.296, 198.260, 198.263, 198.310, 204.250, 205.563, 205.979, 206.070, 206.120, 209.130, 210.860, 233.172, 233.200, 233.345, 233.455, 233.460, 233.510, 235.175, 238.232, 247.130, 247.350, 247.470, 247.550, 249.929, 249.1106, 249.1150, 250.060, 256.445, 257.360, 257.370, 262.598, 263.452, 263.472, 278.240, 278.280, 321.225, 321.240, 321.241, 321.243, 321.244, 321.460, 321.610, 321.620, 64.401, 650.399, 650.408, 66.265, 67.799, 67.990, 67.1422, 67.1531, 67.1551, 67.1880, 67.457, 67.496, 68.235, 68.250, 71.800, 71.802, 80.460, 90.500, 92.010, 92.031, 92.035, 94.060, 94.070, 94.250, 94.260, 94.340, 94.350, 94.400, 95.150, 95.390
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:

02/05/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Introduced and Read First Time

SB1522 - Sen. Joe Nicola (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Summary: SB 1522 - This act modifies provisions relating to property taxes.

PROPERTY INSPECTIONS

Current law requires an assessor to perform a physical inspection of a parcel of residential real property prior to increasing the valuation of such property by more than fifteen percent. This act clarifies that the owner of such property shall have at least thirty days prior to the physical inspection to notify the assessor that the owner desires an interior inspection. Additionally, the act requires the physical inspection to be completed prior to July 1 of the reassessment year. (Section 137.115)

PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS

This act provides that if the common level of assessment, as defined in the act, in a subclass is lower than the individual level of assessment, as defined in the act, of any parcel in such subclass, then the individual level of assessment for such parcel shall be reduced to the common level of assessment. Such reduction shall be made upon an appeal by the taxpayer. (Section 137.132)

PROPERTY TAX APPEALS

Current law provides that, in any appeal in which an assessor fails to provide evidence of a physical inspection required by law, the taxpayer shall prevail as a matter of law. This act also provides that the assessor's increased assessed valuation shall be void in its entirety and the previous assessed valuation shall be applied. (Section 138.060)

This act provides that if a transfer of ownership of real property occurs after January 1 of a non-reassessment year, the new owner shall be entitled to appeal the assessed value of such property directly to the State Tax Commission by no later than December 31 of such year, regardless of whether the previous owner appealed the value of the property during the previous reassessment year. (Section 138.135)

Current law authorizes any first class charter county or city not within a county to require, by ordinance or charter, the reimbursement of just and reasonable appraisal costs, attorney fees, and court costs resulting from hearings before the State Tax Commission for taxpayer appeals of property assessments. This act requires such reimbursements. This act also increases the maximum amount of fees to be reimbursed from $1,000 to $5,000 for residential property appeals, and from $4,000 to $5,000 for utility, industrial railroad, or other subclass three property appeals. (Section 138.434)

PROTESTED PROPERTY TAXES

Current law requires a taxpayer to file a written protest of property taxes with the collector at the same time such taxpayer makes full payment of such taxes. This act repeals such requirement.

This act also provides that the interest due to a taxpayer whose protested taxes were distributed to a taxing authority shall be calculated from the date that the protested taxes were distributed to the taxing authority through the date of the refund.

Any taxpayer determined by a circuit court or the State Tax Commission to be entitled to a refund of property taxes shall receive such refund from the collector within thirty days of the final determination of the refund amount by the circuit court or State Tax Commission. If such refund is not issued within thirty days, the taxpayer shall be entitled to interest on the refund as calculated under current law. (Section 139.031)

This act is identical to SB 786 (2025) and SB 1001 (2024), and is substantially similar to SB 786 (2025), HB 1582 (2025), HCS/HB 2445 (2024), SS/SB 95 (2023), and SB 1108 (2022), and to provisions in SS/SCS/SB 15 (2023).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.115, 137.132, 138.060, 138.135, 138.434, 139.031
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:
02/05/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Introduced and Read First Time

SJR70 - Sen. Rick Brattin (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Summary: SJR 70 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the assessed value of residential real property shall be the most recent assessment. For all subsequent reassessments of such residential real property, the assessed value shall not increase while the owner or owners continue to own such property. Residential real property that is purchased, newly constructed, or undergoes a change in ownership shall be reassessed at its true value in money as provided by law, after which the assessed value of such property shall not increase while the new owner or owners continue to own such property.

The assessed value of residential real property shall reflect the value added to the property as a result of new construction or improvements, as described in the act.

This amendment is identical to SJR 50 (2025) and SJR 54 (2025), is substantially similar to SJR 34 (2025), HCS/HJR 4 (2025), HJR 86 (2025), HJR 89 (2025), SJR 90 (2024), and HCS#2/HJR 78 (2024), and is similar to HJR 85 (2024), HJR 120 (2024), HJR 184 (2024).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 4(b)
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
01/27/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

Bill History:
01/27/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SJR75 - Sen. Barbara Washington (D) - Places limits on increases of the assessment of certain properties
Summary: SJR 75 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the assessed valuation for any residential real property located in a subdivision located adjacent to a subdivision receiving a tax abatement shall not be increased for the duration of time that the adjacent subdivision receives such abatement.

This amendment is identical to SJR 12 (2025), SJR 65 (2024), SJR 36 (2023), SJR 42 (2022), SJR 17 (2021), and HJR 74 (2020).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 4(e)
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:
01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SJR89 - Sen. Jill Carter (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Summary: SJR 89 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the assessed value of residential real property shall be the most recent assessment. For all subsequent reassessments of such residential real property, the assessed value shall not increase while the owner or owners continue to own such property. Residential real property that is purchased, newly constructed, or undergoes a change in ownership shall be reassessed at its true value in money as provided by law, after which the assessed value of such property shall not increase while the new owner or owners continue to own such property.

The assessed value of residential real property shall reflect the value added to the property as a result of new construction or improvements, as described in the act.

This amendment is identical to SJR 50 (2025) and SJR 54 (2025), is substantially similar to SJR 34 (2025), HCS/HJR 4 (2025), HJR 86 (2025), HJR 89 (2025), SJR 90 (2024), and HCS#2/HJR 78 (2024), and is similar to HJR 85 (2024), HJR 120 (2024), HJR 184 (2024).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 4(b)
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:
01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SJR90 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the State Tax Commission
Summary: SJR 90 - This amendment modifies provisions relating to the State Tax Commission.

Current constitutional provisions require the State Tax Commission to equalize assessments as between counties. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the Commission shall not have the power to require a county to enter into any agreement or memorandum of understanding for the purpose of increasing or decreasing the assessed valuation of an entire class or subclass of property, or any of any portion thereof other than through an appeal of a decision made by a local board of equalization, and any reimbursements made to a county by the state for the purposes of assessing property shall not be made contingent on entering into any such agreement or memorandum of understanding.

The amendment also provides that the Commission shall not utilize the standards promulgated by the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) or any other international or domestic organization to carry out the powers and duties provided by law.

This amendment provides that the assessed value of a class or subclass of real or personal property shall not be lower than seventy percent nor more than one hundred percent of the true value in money for such class or subclass, as determined by studies conducted by the Commission.

Finally, this amendment establishes the Office of State Ombudsman for Property Assessment and Taxation within the State Tax Commission, and requires the General Assembly to annually provide for a sufficient appropriation to ensure taxpayers receive the assistance needed to comply with and navigate the property tax process.

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 14
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:
01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SJR102 - Sen. Jill Carter (R) - Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Summary: SJR 102 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits any state agency from taking any punitive action for property tax assessments conducted by a county that fall below the upper range of acceptable assessment levels, as such terms are defined in the amendment.

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 27
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:
02/05/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SJR113 - Sen. Joe Nicola (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Summary: SJR 113 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the assessed value of residential real property shall be the most recent assessment. For all reassessments of such residential real property, the assessed value shall not increase by more than the increase in the Consumer Price Index or by 4%, whichever is less, provided that the assessed value shall reflect the value added to the property as a result of new construction or improvements, as described in the act.

This amendment is identical to HJR 112 (2026), is substantially similar to SJR 34 (2025), SJR 50 (2025), SJR 54 (2025), HCS/HJR 4 (2025), HCS#2/HJR 78 (2024), HJR 86 (2025), HJR 89 (2025), and SJR 90 (2024), and is similar to HJR 85 (2024), HJR 120 (2024), HJR 184 (2024).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 4(b)
Progress: Senate: Filed
Last Action:
Bill History:
02/05/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Introduced and Read First Time