Tracking List: MAC 2026 - Assessment

HB1800 - Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R) - Changes the percentage of the cap on the inflationary growth factor for the assessment growth of real or personal property occurring within a political subdivision, defines assessment value, and adds provisions related to the sales ratio studies performed by the State Tax Commission
Summary:

HB 1800 -- REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS(Matthiesen)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Tax Reform



This bill provides a definition for "assessment value" as it relates to real property assessment purposes (Section 137.016, RSMo).

The bill modifies the manner in which a political subdivision can revise each tax levy to allow for inflationary assessment growth for all subclasses of real and personal property.

Currently, the inflationary growth factor for any subclass of real and personal property is limited to the actual assessment growth, exclusive of new construction and improvements, but not to exceed the Consumer Price Index, or 5%, whichever is lower.

This bill limits the inflationary growth factor for any subclass of real or personal property to the actual assessment growth, but not to exceed the lower of the following:

(1) The Consumer Price Index; or

(2) The following percentages:

(a) For tax levy revisions before January 1, 2027, 5%; or

(b) For tax levy revisions on or after January 1, 2027, 3% (Section 137.073).

The bill provides that, for the purpose of equalizing the valuation of real property and tangible personal property among counties, the State Tax Commission must use ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass of property is valued below or above its true value in money. A class or subclass of property must be considered below or above its true value in money if the weighted mean ratio is less than 70% or greater than 100% (Section 138.390).

This bill is similar to HB 517 (2025).

Citations: 137.016, 137.073, 138.390
Progress: Senate: In Committee
Last Action:
Bill History:
03/23/2026 
S - Read Second Time

03/09/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

03/09/2026 
H - Third Read and Passed - Y-82 N-61

03/09/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

03/09/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

03/05/2026 

03/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review

03/04/2026 
H - Perfected

03/04/2026 
H - Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 1

03/04/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

02/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/09/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative


01/29/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

01/22/2026 

01/22/2026 

01/20/2026 

01/15/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/13/2026 

01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2178 - Rep. Chad Perkins (R) - Modifies provisions governing the taxation of property
Summary:

HCS HB 2178 -- TAXATION OF PROPERTY (Perkins)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

This bill requires that the election authority for a political subdivision or special district label property taxation-related ballot measures numerically or alphabetically. Ballot measures will not be labeled in any other descriptive manner. (Section 115.240)

Beginning January 1, 2027, the bill requires that ballot language for a vote to levy a real property tax or personal property tax include elements as specified in the bill.

This bill requires ballot language to describe the desired tax as a specified amount per $100,000 or per $10,000 of appraised value, depending on whether the property is residential, commercial, agricultural, or a motor vehicle.

The bill prohibits any political subdivision or election authority from advertising or describing any proposed property tax as a ?no tax increase? tax proposal.

The bill requires ballot language statements to be fair, true, and accurate. (Section 115.706)

Currently, real property is divided into three separate classifications based on the use or purpose of the property. Each of the subclassifications of property are assessed at different rates. When real property is used for different purposes resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money of the property devoted to each use.

This bill provides that when a single family home that is owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC) is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, the home will be classified as residential property and will not necessarily be considered "transient housing". (Section 137.016)

The bill provides that when a valuation of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, and other real properties is made by a computer, computer-assisted method, or a computer program, the burden of proof to sustain the valuation must be on the assessor at any hearing or appeal. This bill requires the assessor to conduct a physical inspection of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property before the assessor can increase the assessed valuation of such parcel of real property by more than 15%. If any general reassessment of property causes the assessed valuation to increase by more than 15% from the previous assessment, except for an increase due to new construction or improvement, the increase must be evenly divided between each of the next successive reassessment cycles in a manner that does not cause an increase of more than 15% for any two-year period. If a taxpayer's real property tax liability increases by more than 15%, the assessor and collector must apply a tax credit equal to the amount that exceeds that 15% increase.

This bill requires the physical inspection of a property required to increase the assessed valuation of a parcel of real property by more than 15% since the last assessment to be completed prior to July 1 of the reassessment year. (Section 137.115)

This bill requires an assessor to provide any third-party documents or reports that were relied upon in the computation of a property's assessed value to the property owner. (Section 137.180)

The bill requires assessors to notify a property owner about the method and basis of computation of value for any property that gets an increase in assessed value. (Section 137.355)

If cases arising from general reassessment of a property whose assessed valuation increased by at least 15% are not heard and acted upon by the board of equalization by September 30th of an applicable year, the following must occur:

(1) The case must be dismissed;

(2) The assessor?s increased assessed valuation must be voided; and (3) The previous assessed valuation must be applied instead of the increased assessed valuation. (Section 138.010) If an assessor fails to provide sufficient evidence to prove a physical inspection was performed in an appeal, the assessor?s increased assessed valuation must be voided and the previous assessed valuation must be applied instead of the increased assessed valuation.

If a taxpayer submits a written appraisal report prepared by a certified Missouri appraiser to the board of equalization at least five days prior to the scheduled hearing date, the value of the property provided in the certified appraiser?s report must be the property?s presumptive true value in money. (Section 138.060)

This bill allows a person who just acquired a real property during an even-numbered year to appeal the assessed value to the State Tax Commission (STC). If the appeal is successful, the STC has the authority to lower the property's assessed value. (Section 138.135)

When the STC equalizes the valuation of a class or subclass of property that results in an increase of more than 15%, the increase must be evenly divided between the next reassessment cycles in a way that does not cause an increase of more than 15% for any two-year reassessment period. If a taxpayer's real property tax liability increases by more than 15%, the assessor and collector must apply a tax credit equal to the amount that exceeds that 15% increase. (Section 138.390)

If an assessor appeals certain decisions of the STC to a court and the taxpayer prevails, the taxpayer must be awarded costs of appeal and reasonable attorney?s fees. (Section 138.430)

Currently, in charter counties and the City of St. Louis, taxpayers can be reimbursed appraisal costs, attorneys fees, and court costs incurred during an appeal to the STC if the taxpayer is successful in the appeal. This bill requires such reimbursements. The bill also increases the maximum amount of fees to be reimbursed from $1,000 to $5,000 for residential property appeals, and from $4,000 to $5,000 for commercial, utility, industrial, railroad, or other subclass three property appeals. (Section 138.434)

This bill requires refunds to be issued to taxpayers within 30 days of the date of a determination that the taxpayer is entitled to one. If the collector fails to issue the refund within 30 days, the taxpayer will be entitled to interest on the refund at a rate established by the Director of Revenue. (Section 139.031)

Citations: 115.240, 115.706, 137.016, 137.115, 137.180, 137.355, 138.010, 138.060, 138.135, 138.390, 138.430, 138.434, 139.031
Progress: Senate: In Committee
Last Action:
Bill History:
03/12/2026 
S - Read Second Time

02/23/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

02/23/2026 
H - Third Read and Passed - Y-86 N-53

02/23/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

02/23/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

02/23/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

02/19/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review

02/18/2026 
H - Perfected

02/18/2026 
H - Committee substitute adopted

02/18/2026 
H - Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 4

02/18/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

02/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/09/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative


01/29/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

01/22/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/20/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/21/26 - 12:00 pm - Joint Committee Room (Room 117) - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


01/13/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/09/2026 

01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/04/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB3035 - Rep. Rodger Reedy (R) - Modifies provisions relating to motor vehicle assessment valuations
Summary:

HCS HB 3035 -- MOTOR VEHICLE ASSESSMENTS (Reedy)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Tax Reform

Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill requires the assessor to use 85% of the manufacturer?s suggested retail price (MSRP) for all manufactured motor vehicles to determine the original value in money of all motor vehicle assessment valuations.

The bill provides a 12-year depreciation schedule that must be applied to 85% of each MSRP to develop the annual and historical valuation guide for all motor vehicles. Each year, these values must be delivered to each approved software vendor by November 15th and listed for use in the next assessment year by December 15th.

If there is no listing available from an approved publication for a particular motor vehicle, the assessor must:

(1) Use information or publications that fairly estimate the original value of the motor vehicle; and

(2) Apply the depreciation schedule as provided in the bill.

The State Tax Commission (STC) must secure an annual appropriation for the guide and the programming needed to allow valuations by the vehicle identification number in all certified mass appraisal software systems. The STC or the State must be responsible for renewals and annual software cost for preparing the data in a usable format for approved software vendors.

Citations: 137.115
Progress: Senate: In Committee
Last Action:
Bill History:


03/23/2026 
S - Read Second Time

03/11/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

03/11/2026 
H - Third Read and Passed - Y-100 N-43

03/11/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/11/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

03/11/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

03/10/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review

03/09/2026 
H - Perfected

03/09/2026 
H - Committee substitute adopted

03/09/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/04/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

02/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/25/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 2/26/26 - 9:40 am - HR 3 - House-Rules-Legislative


02/19/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

02/17/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/05/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/03/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing

02/03/2026 

01/29/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

01/27/2026 

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

01/20/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

SB853 - Sen. Brian Williams (D) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Summary: SB 853 - Current law requires a county assessor to provide notification to a taxpayer by no later than June 15 if the assessor increases the taxpayer's real property valuation. This act requires such notice to be provided by no later than June 1. (Section 137.180)

Additionally, current law requires a taxpayer to file an appeal of the taxpayer's assessed valuation by no later than the second Monday in July. This act requires such appeal to be filed by no later than the first Monday in August. (Sections 137.275 to 138.180)

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.180, 137.275, 137.385, 138.180
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Superseded by SB 1410

Bill History:
03/11/2026 
S - Superseded by SB 1410




01/08/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB919 - Sen. Joe Nicola (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Summary: SCS/SB 919 - This act modifies several provisions relating to property taxes.

CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

This act prohibits an assessor from reclassifying real property without first conducting an in-person consultation with the owner of record of such property. An assessor shall be deemed to be in compliance with this provision if the assessor can document a good-faith effort to contact the owner of record, as described in the act. (Section 137.016)

REAL PROPERTY ASSESSED VALUES

Current law provides that an assessor shall not increase the assessed valuation of any parcel of residential real property by more than fifteen percent since the last reassessment without first conducting a physical inspection of the property and providing notice to the taxpayer. This act modifies such provision by prohibiting any increase in assessments of residential real property in excess of fifteen percent. Additionally, a property owner may request the assessor to conduct a physical inspection, provided that the assessed value shall not increase as a result of such inspection. (Section 137.115.10)

REAL PROPERTY TAX CREDIT

Current law authorizes certain counties to provide a tax credit for the property tax liabilities owed on an eligible taxpayer's homestead. This act repeals such provision and instead provides that all counties shall provide a property tax credit for any real property owned by an eligible taxpayer, provided that the real property tax liability owed on the taxpayer's real property may be increased by no more than 2.5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is less. However, for any county in which any subclass of real property is considered to be valued below its true value in money, as determined in the act, the amount by which a taxpayer's real property tax liability may increase shall not exceed 5% per year, provided that this provision shall no longer apply to a county once such subclass of real property in such county is no longer considered to be valued below its true value in money.

Additionally, the act provides that no personal property tax liability owed on any individual item of personal property shall not be increased above the liability owed on such item during the 2024 tax year or the first year an eligible taxpayer first incurs personal property tax liability on such personal property, whichever occurs later. Any eligible taxpayer experiencing such an increase shall be eligible for a credit on the eligible taxpayer's personal property tax liability in an amount equal to such increase, as described in the act. (Sections 137.1058 and 137.1055)

STATE TAX COMMISSION RATIO STUDIES

Current law requires the State Tax Commission to equalize the valuation of each class and subclass of property among the respective counties. This act requires the Commission to utilize ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass is valued below or above its true value. Such values shall be no less than 75% and no more than 100% of true market value, as described in the act. (Section 138.390)

JOSHUA NORBERG

Citations: 137.016, 137.115, 137.1055, 137.1058, 138.390
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/30/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/30/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/25/2026 

03/11/2026 




01/08/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1066 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property
Summary:

SCS/SBs 1066 & 1088 - This act modifies the definition of "residential property" for the purposes of the taxation of real property by providing that such definition shall include single family homes that are owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company and leased, in whole or in part, for a term of less than thirty consecutive days.

 

This act is identical to SCS/HB 1086 (2025) and is substantially similar to SB 699 (2025) and SB 784 (2025), and to a provision in HB 660 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.016
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
04/01/2026 

Bill History:
04/01/2026 

03/26/2026 

03/26/2026 
H - Read Second Time

03/25/2026 
H - Reported to the House and read first time

03/25/2026 
S - Third Read and Passed - Y-30 N-3

03/25/2026 
S - Laid out for consideration

03/25/2026 
S - Reported Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight

03/25/2026 
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight

03/24/2026 

03/23/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Fiscal Oversight

03/23/2026 
S - Perfected

03/23/2026 
S - Floor Substitute Adopted

03/23/2026 
S - Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 2

03/23/2026 
S - Laid out for consideration

02/26/2026 
S - Reported Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions

02/18/2026 
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions

02/09/2026 


01/27/2026 
S - Re-referred to committee - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions


01/15/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

HB1768 - Rep. Chris Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property used for short-term rentals
Summary: HCS HBs 1768 & 2060 -- CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY (Brown)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Currently, real property is divided into three separate classifications based on the use or purpose of the property. Each of the subclassifications of property are assessed at different rates. When real property is used for different purposes resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money of the property devoted to each use.

This bill provides that when a single family home that is owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC) is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, the home will be classified as residential property and will not necessarily be considered "transient housing".

This bill is similar to SCS HB 1086 (2025) and SCS HB 1086 (2025).
Citations: 137.016
Progress: House: Perfected
Last Action:
03/31/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

Bill History:
03/31/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

03/31/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

03/30/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/31/2026, 9:00 AM - House-Fiscal Review, HR 4

03/25/2026 
H - Perfected

03/25/2026 
H - Committee substitute adopted

03/25/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/11/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/10/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/09/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4

03/04/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

03/04/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/17/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/16/2026 

02/10/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/06/2026 

01/29/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB1759 - Rep. Mike McGirl (R) - Modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 12 to 7.

Currently, personal property is assessed at 33.3% of its true value in money as of January 1st of each calendar year. Beginning January 1, 2027, personal property must be assessed at 30% of its true value in money.

This bill is similar to HB 629 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill will give taxpayers relief by reducing the assessment rate.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Mcgirl; Associated Industries of Missouri; and Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the bill will shift the tax burden to every homeowner and every business in the taxing jurisdiction, and they cannot afford this change.

Testifying in person against the bill was Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessors Association.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.115
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

02/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/25/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 2/26/26 - 9:40 am - HR 3 - House-Rules-Legislative


02/19/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

02/18/2026 

02/03/2026 

01/29/2026 

01/13/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/09/2026 

01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2060 - Rep. Jeff Vernetti (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property used for short-term rentals
Summary: Currently, real property is divided into three separate classifications based on the use or purpose of the property. Each of the subclassifications of property are assessed at different rates. When real property is used for different purposes resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money of the property devoted to each use.

This bill provides that when a single family home is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, such a home will be classified as residential property and will not be considered transient housing.



This bill is similar to HB 1086 (2025) and HB 1086 (2025).
Citations: 137.016
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/04/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 1768

Bill History:
03/04/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 1768

03/04/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/17/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/16/2026 

02/10/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/06/2026 

01/29/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2329 - Rep. Richard West (R) - Reduces the assessment percentage of tangible personal property over a period of years
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 6 to 4.

This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the percentage of the true value in money at which personal property is assessed will be reduced over a period of three years until it will be assessed at 18% of its true value in money.

This bill is similar to HB 903 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill cuts personal property taxes for taxpayers. Those in support of the bill state that personal property taxes are felt more because taxpayers must pay that tax out of pocket. Supporters say this bill gives districts time to prepare for the reduction and eventual elimination of the personal property tax.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative West; and Americans For Prosperity.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill will devastate local taxing districts, particularly smaller counties. Opponents state that the school districts, hospital districts, and fire districts in small and rural counties will suffer the most because the bill does not provide any mechanisms for these districts to recoup the lost tax revenues.

Testifying in person against the bill was Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association; Missouri Association of Counties; Missouri National Education Association; and Missouri Municipal League.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.115
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/30/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Ways and Means

Bill History:
03/30/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Ways and Means

02/16/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Ways and Means

02/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/16/2026, 4:30 PM - House - Ways and Means, HR 5

02/09/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means

02/05/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/09/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Ways and Means, HR 5

01/25/2026 
H - Committee hearing cancelled - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

01/22/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

01/22/2026 

01/15/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Ways and Means

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/10/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2402 - Rep. Danny Busick (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Summary: Currently, the definition of "tangible personal property", for the purposes of property taxation, includes solar panels, racking systems, inverters, and related solar equipment, components, materials, and supplies installed in connection with solar photovoltaic energy systems that were constructed and producing solar energy prior to August 9, 2022. This subclass of tangible personal property is assessed at five percent of its true value in money. This bill removes the limitation that the property must be constructed and producing energy prior to August 9, 2022.

Currently, where real property is used for more than one purpose resulting in different classifications, the county Assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money for the property devoted to each use. This bill specifies that any property classified as agricultural property that is used for the purpose of energy production activities for resale must be proportionally calculated, assessed, and reclassified as commercial property.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $2,500 per megawatt of nameplate capacity. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property. This does not prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or certain abatement agreements, and it does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100, RSMo.

Beginning January 1, 2027, land associated with a solar energy project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity in excess of five megawatts must be classified as subclass (3) real property and assessed as commercial property. This bill also provides that, for certain public utility companies that have a solar energy project, the solar energy project must be assessed using a specific methodology. This does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

The bill also provides that for real or tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy to generate electricity, including equipment used to support the integration of a solar generation asset into an existing system, must be valued and taxed by local authorities. This does not apply to certain photovoltaic energy systems or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

This bill provides that a county commission can choose to opt-in to the provision that limits the total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in the county to 4% of all cropland in the county or less. Acres owned by utilities or electrical corporations must not be included in the 4% county calculation. The acreage is determined by the perimeter of the actual solar panels. County commissions choosing to adopt the 4% limit option must have procedures and a severability clause in those procedures.

For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks specified in the bill as measured from the nearest occupied dwelling, church, or school to the perimeter of the nearest solar panel. This setback must not apply to an official agreement between the project and the property owner. This setback does not apply to solar energy projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2025, or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project.

This bill is the similar to HCS HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).
Citations: 137.010, 137.016, 137.080, 137.115, 137.124, 153.030, 153.034, 393.1120
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/26/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2762

Bill History:
03/26/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2762

03/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

03/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

03/25/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/26/2026, 2:30 PM - House-Utilities, HR 1

02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

01/30/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Utilities

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/15/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2415 - Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R) - Establishes a definition of "assessment value" for real property assessment purposes
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 14 to 2.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2415.

This bill provides a definition for "assessment value" as it relates to real property assessment purposes.

This bill provides that, for the purpose of equalizing the valuation of real property and tangible personal property among counties, the State Tax Commission must use ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass of property is valued below or above its true value in money. A class or subclass of property must be considered below or above its true value in money if the weighted mean ratio is less than 70% or greater than 100%.



The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that many counties don't have enough sales data to use the market value approach, so this bill modifies the way assessors are currently valuing buildings in real property assessments and has them use the replacement approach. Those in support of the bill say seniors are being taxed out of their homes, and this bill brings assessments back to reality.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Van Schoiack; Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say assessors can use cost approach, market approach, or income approach. The cost approach is effective on new buildings but becomes more subjective on older buildings due to depreciation. Others state that the problem is with depreciation, and assessors should use the cost approach and the market approach for residential property. Others testifying on the bill note that people lose their homes largely because they cannot afford their taxes. Testifying in person on the bill were Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association; George Monk; and Jon Stambaugh.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.016, 138.390
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
04/01/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/02/2026, 10:30 AM - House-Rules-Administrative, HR 4

Bill History:
04/01/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/02/2026, 10:30 AM - House-Rules-Administrative, HR 4

03/25/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/17/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/16/2026 

02/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/29/2026 

01/15/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/15/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2711 - Rep. Dane Diehl (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the assessment of certain broadband communications equipment
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Utilities by a vote of 12 to 7.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2711.

This bill adds machinery and equipment used to provide wired or wireless broadband communications service to the definition of "tangible personal property" for the purposes of property taxation.

The bill also creates a new subclass of tangible personal property that includes new machinery and equipment used to provide fiber and broadband communications service that is placed in service after August 28, 2026. Such property will be assessed at 12% of its true value in money for calendar years 2027 through 2033 and 33 1/3% beginning in 2034.

This bill is similar to SB 1202 (2026).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the states surrounding Missouri have lower tax rates on broadband equipment. The current tax structure in the state does not incentivize broadband expansion and upgrades. This bill would incentivize upgrades and expansion by lowering the tax rate and allowing additional investment by broadband providers.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Diehl; T- Mobile USA, Inc.; Missouri Broadband Providers Association; MCTA - The Missouri Internet & Television Association); Verizon Communications and Affiliated Companies; AT&T Missouri; Association of Missouri Electric Cooperatives; Missouri Chamber of Commerce; Gateway Fiber; Missouri Association of Counties.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill allows for the assessment of broadband equipment that is different than other similarly situated equipment. It also moves several items that are classified currently as real property to personal property.

Testifying in person against the bill were Kenneth Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.010, 137.080, 137.115
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/10/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative


03/04/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

02/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

02/25/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

02/19/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

01/30/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Utilities

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

01/06/2026 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2816 - Rep. Kent Haden (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Summary: Currently, the definition of "tangible personal property", for the purposes of property taxation, includes solar panels, racking systems, inverters, and related solar equipment, components, materials, and supplies installed in connection with solar photovoltaic energy systems that were constructed and producing solar energy prior to August 9, 2022. This subclass of tangible personal property is assessed at five percent of its true value in money. This bill removes the limitation that the property must be constructed and producing energy prior to August 9, 2022.

Currently, where real property is used for more than one purpose resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money for the property devoted to each use. This bill specifies that any property classified as agricultural property that is used for the purpose of energy production activities for resale must be proportionally calculated, assessed, and reclassified as commercial property.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $2,500 per megawatt of nameplate capacity and adjusted annually for inflation. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property. This does not prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or certain abatement agreements, and it does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100, RSMo.

Beginning January 1, 2027, land associated with a solar energy project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity in excess of five megawatts must be classified as subclass (3) real property and assessed as commercial property. This bill also provides that, for certain public utility companies that have a solar energy project, the solar energy project must be assessed using a specific methodology. This does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

The bill also provides that for real or tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy to generate electricity, including equipment used to support the integration of a solar generation asset into an existing system, must be valued and taxed by local authorities. This does not apply to certain photovoltaic energy systems or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

This bill provides that a county commission can choose to opt-in, upon a majority vote, to the provision that limits the total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in the county to four percent of all cropland in the county or less. Acres owned by utilities or electrical corporations must not be included in the four percent county calculation. The acreage is determined by the perimeter of the actual solar panels. County commissions choosing to adopt the four percent limit option must have procedures and a severability clause in those procedures.

For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks specified in the bill as measured from the nearest occupied dwelling, church, or school to the perimeter of the nearest solar panel. This setback must not apply to an official agreement between the project and the property owner. This setback does not apply to solar energy projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2025, or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100.

A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project.

This bill is the similar to HB 2402 (2026) and HCS HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).
Citations: 137.010, 137.016, 137.080, 137.115, 137.124, 153.030, 153.034, 393.1120
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/26/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2762

Bill History:
03/26/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2762

03/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

03/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

03/25/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/26/2026, 2:30 PM - House-Utilities, HR 1

02/04/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

01/30/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Utilities

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB2923 - Rep. Carolyn Caton (R) - Establishes the "Homestead Improvement Property Tax Relief Act" exempting qualifying improvements to a homestead from real property taxation
Summary: This bill establishes the "Homestead Improvement Property Tax Relief Act".

For each year of the exemption period established in the bill, the improvement value of a qualifying improvement to a homestead property must be exempt from real property taxation, not to exceed $75,000 in true value in money for any one homestead property. This exemption must not apply to the pre-improvement base value of the dwelling or the true value in money of the land.

To be eligible for the exemption, the property must be considered homestead property by the start date of construction of the qualifying improvement and on January 1 of each tax year the exemption is claimed. Additionally, the owner of the homestead property must file the necessary documentation.

The owner must file the Homestead Improvement Exemption intent form with the assessor prior to the issuance of a building permit or within 60 days after the start of construction (if no permit is required). The assessor must review the intent form and notify the owner of their approval or denial for the exemption based on the intent form.

The owner must submit a Homestead Improvement Exemption form and supporting documentation to the assessor within 180 days after completion of the improvement.

Exemption denials must only occur if there is inadequate documentation or the form shows the estimated cost of the improvement is $7500 or less.

The exemption for qualifying improvements must attach to the homestead property, and it must apply for four consecutive tax years as long as:

(1) The property remains a qualifying homestead property on January 1 of each year;

(2) The qualifying improvement is not destroyed or removed (except by a catastrophic event); or (3) The owner does not provide voluntary written relinquishment of the exemption. If such homestead property is damaged or destroyed by a catastrophic event, the true value in money of the improvements from before the catastrophic event must continue to be used as the pre-improvement base value during the tax year such event occurred.

If the owner replaces, reconstructs, or repairs the damaged dwelling on the same parcel of land within three years of the event, such replacements, reconstruction, or repairs must be treated as a qualifying improvement. The value of this improvement, not to exceed $75,000 for an insured dwelling or $200,000 for an uninsured dwelling, must be exempt for the four- year exemption period.

To determine the improvement value, the assessor must follow the procedures provided in the bill.

The State Tax Commission must adopt rules, regulations, procedures, and standard forms that are necessary to implement the provisions of this exemption.

This homestead improvement exemption must be in addition to other homestead, senior citizen, disability, or property tax relief programs.
Citations: 137.115, 137.1081
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/31/2026 

Bill History:
03/31/2026 

03/24/2026 
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 3/26/26 - 9:00 am - HR 1 - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

03/24/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 3/26/26 - 9:00 am - HR 1 - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

03/23/2026 

03/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

01/13/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/12/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3253 - Rep. Kathy Steinhoff (D) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 11 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3253 & 3254.

ASSESSORS (Section 53.255, 137.121, 137.180, 137.355, 137.490)

Currently, the State Tax Commission (STC) must set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours for each course of study for assessors and assessor-elects. This bill adds that the State Tax Commission must either set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours or at least 40 hours for any new assessor or assessor-elect and at least 40 hours of training for any newly elected assessor.

The bill requires each assessor to attend at least one additional approved course of study within each 2-year period to remain certified.

Currently, the Director of Revenue must suspend payments of assessment costs by the State to the county in which the assessor is serving once notified by the Commission that the assessor has failed to properly comply with certification requirements and until the assessor complies or is no longer in office. This bill repeals this provision and allows an assessor to:

(1) Create, maintain, and store certain information in an electronic format;

(2) Establish electronic notification and record delivery systems;

(3) Notify property owners of an increased valuation or projected tax liability via first-class mail or by electronic means; and

(4) Provide other official communication electronically.

Currently, when an assessor increases the valuation of any real property they must notify the record owner of the increase, either in person, or by mail to the last known address of the owner, this bill specifies first-class mail and adds that the valuation may be sent by electronic means, including email or secure electronic delivery, as long as the property owner has consented to electronic delivery or has provided an email address to the assessor's office.

PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES (Section 139.031 and 139.053)

The bill allows the governing body of any county to provide for partial payments on residential real property taxes assessed and in dispute in certain circumstances. The county may enter into an agreement with a taxpayer to require the taxpayer to make a minimum payment as described in the bill. If a taxpayer fails to make the initial approved partial payment on or before the due date in the agreement, the county must charge the taxpayer interest and penalties on the amount of property taxes still owed.

Currently, any county other than a township county may, by order or ordinance, allow its taxpayers the option to pay any part of their real and personal property taxes on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis. This bill allows township counties the option to pass such an order or ordinance.

The bill also requires the governing body of each county or city not within a county to allow for pre-payment of current real property taxes owed on an annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or monthly basis.



The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill addresses topics that were discussed during the property tax hearings that occurred across the state. Those in support of the bill say it addresses per parcel rate to fund assessment resources, payment requirements when an assessment is under appeal, training for assessors, use of technology during assessments, and property tax levies by subclass. Supporters state that giving additional resources to assessors, requiring additional training for assessors, and provisions that help taxpayers to make their payments will be good for special districts.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Steinhoff; and Missouri Special Districts Association.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that the idea for state reimbursement to counties is good, but the question is where the funds for this reimbursement will come from. Those testifying state that the State Tax Commission (STC) must be responsible for ensuring there is fairness in assessments via equalization. Others testifying on the bill say that commissioners from the STC do not have mandatory trainings, but they do often attend trainings.

Testifying in person on the bill were Missouri Council Of School Administrators; and Dan Hutton, State Tax Commission/State Ombudsman.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.180, 137.355, 137.490, 137.121, 139.031, 139.053, 53.255
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Bill History:
03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

03/12/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

03/10/2026 

03/04/2026 

02/26/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/25/2026 

02/19/2026 

02/11/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/10/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3254 - Rep. Will Jobe (D) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax
Summary: ASSESSORS (Section 53.255, 137.121, 137.180, 137.355, and 137.490)

Currently, the State Tax Commission (STC) must set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours for each course of study for assessors and assessor-elects. This bill adds that the STC must set classroom time totaling at least 40 hours for any new assessor or assessor-elect beginning January 1, 2027. Any newly elected assessor must complete at least 40 hours of training before assuming office.

This bill requires assessors to attend at least one additional approved course of study within each 2-year period to remain certified.

Currently, once the state director of revenue is notified by the STC that an assessor has failed to comply with certification requirements, the state director of revenue must immediately suspend payments of assessment costs to the county in which the assessor is serving. These payments must be suspended until one of the following occurs:

(1) The assessor complies with certification requirements;

(2) The assessor resigns from office;

(3) The assessor is removed from office by appropriate legal action; or

(4) The assessor?s successor is qualified. The bill repeals this provision.

This bill requires the assessor to conduct a physical inspection of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property before the assessor can increase the assessed valuation of such parcel of real property by more than 15%.

The bill allows county assessors to use technology to determine the true value in money of real property if it is used in accordance with accepted mass appraisal standards. This bill also allows authorized technology to be used to satisfy any physical inspection requirements. The bill allows assessors to:

(1) Create, maintain, and store certain information in an electronic format;

(2) Establish electronic notification and record delivery systems;

(3) Notify property owners of an increased valuation or projected tax liability via first-class mail or by electronic means; and

(4) Provide other official communication electronically.

PROPERTY TAX RATES (Section 137.073, 137.079, 137.115)

Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase may levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate.

The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate.

Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property, in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline.

As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces such language with that relating to multiple tax rates.

Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill no. 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county may also opt out of implementing certain provisions of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill no. 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes.

This bill repeals the references to the provisions of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and Senate bill no. 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt out of or to implement such provisions.

The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county to determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate.

ASSESSMENT MAINTENANCE PLANS (Section 137.750) Currently, the State must reimburse each eligible county a minimum of $3.00 per parcel for up to 20,000 parcels if the county has an approved assessment maintenance plan. This bill increases the minimum to $4.00 per parcel. .

PROPERTY TAX CREDITS (Section 137.1050 and 137.1055)

Currently, any county that is authorized to impose a property tax may grant a property tax credit to seniors who own a qualifying homestead. The bill requires the State to reimburse any political subdivision for any decrease in revenue due to this authorized tax credit. Currently, certain counties must place on the ballot a question whether to grant a homestead property tax credit to limit the increase of an eligible taxpayer?s real property tax liability on his or her homestead. This bill requires the State to reimburse any political subdivision for any decrease in revenue due to this authorized tax credit.

PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES (Section 139.031 and 139.053)

The bill allows the governing body of any county to provide for partial payments on residential real property taxes assessed and in dispute in certain circumstances. Such county can enter into an agreement with a taxpayer to require the taxpayer to make a minimum payment, as described in the bill. If a taxpayer fails to make the initial approved partial payment on or before the due date stated in the agreement, the county must charge the taxpayer interest on the amount of property taxes still owed.

Currently, the governing body of any county can allow, by ordinance or order, the option for taxpayers to pay any part of their real and personal property taxes on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis. However, township counties are excluded from the ability to allow taxpayers these payment options. This bill allows township counties the option to pass such an order or ordinance.

The bill also requires the governing body of each county or city not within a county to allow for pre-payment of current real property taxes owed on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis.

This bill is similar to HB 3253 (2026).
Citations: 137.073, 137.079, 137.115, 137.180, 137.355, 137.490, 137.750, 137.1050, 137.1055, 137.121, 139.031, 139.053, 53.255
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 3253

Bill History:
03/12/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 3253

03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

03/12/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

03/10/2026 

03/04/2026 

02/26/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/25/2026 

02/19/2026 

02/11/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/10/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HJR171 - Rep. Bill Falkner (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing school districts to include governmental entity property owned for development or redevelopment purposes in calculations of assessed valuation for school district indebtedness purposes
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Legislative Review by a vote of 7 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HJR 171.

This constitutional amendment, if adopted, would amend Article VI of the Missouri Constitution to allow school districts to include property owned by a governmental entity used for development or redevelopment purposes in the calculation of assessed valuation for determining the limitation cap on school district indebtedness.

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this resolution would allow school districts to borrow more money against their bonding, changing it from just municipalities to all government entities.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Falkner; and Stifel.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: ART IV.SEC 26(b)
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/03/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Legislative Review

Bill History:
03/03/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Legislative Review

03/03/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Legislative Review

02/27/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing

02/27/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/03/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Legislative Review, HR 5

02/24/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Legislative Review

02/20/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/24/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Legislative Review, HR 5

02/19/2026 
H - Re-referred to committee - House-Legislative Review

02/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-General Laws

01/22/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/21/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time