Tracking List: MAC 2026 - Property & Personal Property Tax

HB1790 - Rep. Jim Murphy (R) - Modifies provisions relating to tax levies by political subdivisions
Summary:

HCS HB 1790 -- TAX LEVIES BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS (Murphy)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Government Efficiency

This bill requires that the election authority for a political subdivision or special district label taxation-related ballot measures numerically or alphabetically. Ballot measures will not be labeled in any other descriptive manner.

The bill requires that any ballot measure that seeks approval to add, change, or modify a tax on real property use language to express the effect of the proposed change in terms of real dollars owed per $100,000 of a property's market valuation.

This bill requires that if voters in a political subdivision approve a levy increase prior to the expiration of a previously approved temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling will remain in effect only until the temporary levy increase expires under the terms originally approved by voters. At that time, the tax rate ceiling will be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase unless voters of the political subdivision are asked to approve an additional permanent increase, the ballot language makes clear that the temporary levy increase is being made permanent, and such increase is approved.

The bill requires that when voters in a political subdivision pass a tax rate increase, the political subdivision must use the current tax rate ceiling and the increase approved by the voters in establishing the rates of levy for the tax year immediately following the election. If the assessed valuation of real property in a political subdivision sees a reduction in value in the tax year immediately following the election, the political subdivision may raise its tax rates so that the revenue received from the local real property tax rates equals the amount the political subdivision would have received from the increased rates of levy had there been no reduction in the assessed valuation of real property in the political subdivision. In the event of an increased tax rate ceiling, such rate must be revenue neutral as required in Article X, Section 22 of the Constitution of Missouri.

This bill is similar to HCS HB 119 (2025) and HCS HB 1517 (2024).

Citations: 115.240, 137.073, 137.067
Progress: Senate: In Committee
Last Action:
03/12/2026 

Bill History:
03/12/2026 

03/12/2026 
S - Read Second Time

02/23/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

02/23/2026 
H - Third Read and Passed - Y-114 N-24

02/23/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

02/18/2026 
H - Perfected

02/18/2026 
H - Committee substitute adopted

02/18/2026 
H - Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 1

02/18/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

02/10/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

02/10/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

02/04/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/10/2026, 9:30 AM - House-Rules-Administrative, HR 4

01/29/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

01/28/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Government Efficiency

01/22/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Government Efficiency

01/20/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/22/2026, 8:00 AM - House - Government Efficiency, HR 7

01/15/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Government Efficiency


01/08/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Government Efficiency

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2780 - Rep. Tim Taylor (R) - Modifies provisions governing property taxes
Summary:

HCS#2 HB 2780 -- PROPERTY TAXATION (Taylor (48))

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase may levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate.

The bill removes the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate.

Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property, in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate.

This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline.

The bill requires that, if voters in a political subdivision approve a levy increase prior to the expiration of a previously- approved temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling will remain in effect only until the temporary levy increase expires under the terms originally approved by voters. At that time, the tax rate ceiling will be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase unless voters of the political subdivision are asked to approve an additional permanent increase and such increase is approved.

This bill requires that, when voters in a political subdivision pass a tax rate increase, the political subdivision must use the current tax rate ceiling and the increase approved by the voters in establishing the rates of levy for the tax year immediately following the election. If the assessed valuation of real property in a political subdivision sees a reduction in value in the tax year immediately following the election, the political subdivision can raise its tax rates so that the revenue received from the local real property tax rates equals the amount the political subdivision would have received from the increased rates of levy had there been no reduction in the assessed valuation of real property in the political subdivision. In the event of an increased tax rate ceiling, the rate must be revenue neutral as required in Article X, Section 22 of the Constitution of Missouri. (Section 137.073, RSMo).

As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals the single property tax rate and replaces the language with that relating to multiple tax rates (Section 137.079, RSMo).

This bill provides that when a valuation of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, and other real properties is made by a computer, computer-assisted method, or a computer program, the burden of proof to sustain the valuation must be on the assessor at any hearing or appeal.

The bill provides that, before any assessor may increase the assessed valuation of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property by more than 15% since the last assessment, the assessor must conduct a physical inspection of the property.

Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of House bill 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county may also opt out of implementing certain provisions of House Bill 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate Bill 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes. This bill repeals the references to the provisions of House Bill 1150 (2002) and Senate Bill 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt out of or to implement these provisions.

The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county must determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and for personal property, in the aggregate (Section 137.115, RSMo).

Currently, no school district can receive more state aid for its education program than it received per weighted average daily attendance for the school year 2005-06 from the foundation formula, unless it has an operating levy for school purposes of not less than $2.75. This bill changes the operating levy floor to receive certain state aid to $2.20 beginning the 2026-27 school year. For school districts that imposed a levy of $2.75 in 2026, their maximum levy must be $2.75 in 2027. After 2027, these school districts must set their levy as provided by the Missouri Constitution (Section 163.021, RSMo).

This bill contains a severability clause.

This bill is similar to HB 2668 (2026).

Citations: 137.073, 137.079, 137.115, 163.021
Progress: Senate: In Committee
Last Action:
Bill History:


03/23/2026 
S - Read Second Time

03/09/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

03/05/2026 
H - Third Read and Passed - Y-133 N-13

03/05/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/03/2026 
H - Re-Perfected

03/03/2026 
H - Committee substitute adopted

03/03/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

02/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/25/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

02/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/24/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


02/19/2026 
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 2/23/26 - 4:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 4 - House-Rules-Legislative

02/19/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/23/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4

02/18/2026 

02/17/2026 
H - Recommitted to committee - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/17/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

02/16/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

02/16/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

02/12/2026 

02/12/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review

02/11/2026 
H - Perfected

02/11/2026 
H - Committee substitute adopted

02/11/2026 
H - Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 3

02/11/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

02/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/09/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative


02/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

02/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/05/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/04/2026 

01/29/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/29/26 - 10:30 am or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/27/2026 

01/20/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/21/26 - 12:00 pm - Joint Committee Room (Room 117) - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HJR173 - Rep. Bishop Davidson (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Summary:

HCS HJRs 173 & 174 -- TAXATION (Davidson)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Commerce

Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment repeals Sections 4(d) and 26 of Article X of the Missouri Constitution and adopts two new sections in their place relating to taxation.

The amendment authorizes the General Assembly, when enacting any law imposing a tax measured by income, to define income by reference to provisions of federal law as those provisions may become effective from time to time, whether retrospective or prospective. The General Assembly must set the rate or rates of any such tax and may make exceptions, additions, or modifications to any federal provisions referenced in defining income.

The amendment establishes a mechanism to reduce and eliminate the state individual income tax based on increases in net general revenue collections. For a calendar year, the rate of the individual income tax must be reduced by one-hundredth of one percent if net general revenue collections in the previous fiscal year exceed by at least $20 million the amount of net general revenue collections for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025. The amount of net general revenue collections for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2025, must be adjusted annually by the rate of inflation. If the minimum amount of net general revenue collections required to trigger a reduction is met, each additional increase in net general revenue collections in the previous fiscal year by $20 million beyond that minimum must result in an additional reduction of one-hundredth of one percent, up to a maximum reduction of one and six-tenths percent in a calendar year.

If the rate reductions required under the amendment would cause the individual income tax rate to fall below one and four-tenths percent for any tax year, the rate imposed must instead be 0%. If the reductions do not eliminate the individual income tax by January 1, 2032, the tax may continue until it is eliminated according to the revenue triggers and rate reductions established in the amendment. For any tax year beginning on or after the date the individual income tax rate has been reduced to 0%, no individual income tax may be enacted or imposed by the state. The amendment specifies that elimination of the tax does not affect the collectability of liabilities or debts for tax years beginning before the date of elimination and does not apply to an earnings tax or similar tax imposed by a political subdivision. For purposes of this provision, "individual income tax" is defined as the tax imposed on the income of natural persons under Sections 143.011 and 143.041, RSMo.

The amendment defines certain terms used in the tax reduction provisions. "CPI" is defined as the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the United States as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics or a successor index. "Net general revenue collections" is defined as the total general revenue collections net of refunds for a fiscal year as officially reported to the public by a government body specified by law. "Rate of inflation" is defined as the percentage, if any, by which the CPI for the preceding 12-month period beginning September first and ending August 31st exceeds the CPI for the 12-month period beginning September 1, 2025, and ending August 31, 2026. "Twenty million dollars" is defined as the $20 million adjusted annually by the rate of inflation.

The amendment provides that state and local sales and use taxes, or similar transaction-based taxes, may not be expanded to impose taxes on any service or transaction that was not subject to sales, use, or similar transaction-based tax on January 1, 2015. Notwithstanding that limitation, the General Assembly may authorize the expansion of sales and use taxes to transactions involving goods and services if legislation expressly states that the expansion is enacted for the purpose of reducing and eliminating the State individual income tax and reducing local tax rates, and the legislation includes a finding by the General Assembly that the expansion is anticipated, directly or indirectly, to lead to the reduction and elimination of the State individual income tax and the reduction of local tax rates.

Beginning January 1, 2029, any political subdivision that imposes a sales and use tax must, in the manner and frequency provided by law enacted by the General Assembly, annually adjust one or more specified tax rates or levies in order to reduce revenue generated in an amount substantially equal to the additional revenue produced by any sales and use tax base expansion authorized under the amendment. These adjustments may include changes to the rate of the sales or use tax, the operating levy for personal property taxes, the operating levy for residential real property taxes, the operating levy for all property taxes levied by a political subdivision that imposes the same rate of levy upon all taxable property, or the rate of any tax imposed on earnings. The amendment specifies that under no circumstances may a county or other political subdivision make an adjustment that results in a reduction in funding to public schools within or serving the jurisdiction. Beginning January 1, 2028, each sales and use tax rate imposed directly by the Missouri Constitution, except the rate imposed under Article XIV of the Missouri Constitution, must be adjusted in the manner provided by law to produce substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the median annual amount of tax revenue produced during the three state fiscal years ending in 2024, 2025, and 2026, after the revenue for each fiscal year is adjusted for inflation. The State Auditor must determine the reasonable estimate of the median annual revenue amount and calculate the reduced rates necessary to produce that amount.

The amendment also provides that any tax or revenue increase resulting from legislation enacted for the purpose of reducing and eliminating the state individual income tax and reducing local tax rates, if enacted within three years of the effective date of the amendment, will not be considered new annual revenue for purposes of Section 18(e) of Article X of the Missouri Constitution and will be exempt from the requirements of Article IV, Sections 30(b), 30(c), and 30(d) of the Missouri Constitution.

The amendment includes ballot language for this proposed constitutional amendment.

Citations: ART X.SEC 4(d), ART X.SEC 26
Progress: Senate: In Committee
Last Action:
04/01/2026 
S - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 4/1/26 - 10:45 am - SCR 1 - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

Bill History:
04/01/2026 
S - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 4/1/26 - 10:45 am - SCR 1 - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

03/31/2026 

03/23/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

03/23/2026 
S - Read Second Time

03/19/2026 
S - Read First Time

03/16/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and not read

03/12/2026 
H - Third Read and Passed - Y-98 N-54

03/12/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

03/12/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

03/11/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review

03/10/2026 
H - Perfected - Y-85 N-48

03/10/2026 
H - Committee substitute adopted

03/10/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/05/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative


03/04/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

03/04/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Commerce

03/04/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Commerce

03/02/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 6

01/28/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Commerce

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Commerce

01/22/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/28/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 6

01/22/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/21/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

SB919 - Sen. Joe Nicola (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Summary: SCS/SB 919 - This act modifies several provisions relating to property taxes.

CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY

This act prohibits an assessor from reclassifying real property without first conducting an in-person consultation with the owner of record of such property. An assessor shall be deemed to be in compliance with this provision if the assessor can document a good-faith effort to contact the owner of record, as described in the act. (Section 137.016)

REAL PROPERTY ASSESSED VALUES

Current law provides that an assessor shall not increase the assessed valuation of any parcel of residential real property by more than fifteen percent since the last reassessment without first conducting a physical inspection of the property and providing notice to the taxpayer. This act modifies such provision by prohibiting any increase in assessments of residential real property in excess of fifteen percent. Additionally, a property owner may request the assessor to conduct a physical inspection, provided that the assessed value shall not increase as a result of such inspection. (Section 137.115.10)

REAL PROPERTY TAX CREDIT

Current law authorizes certain counties to provide a tax credit for the property tax liabilities owed on an eligible taxpayer's homestead. This act repeals such provision and instead provides that all counties shall provide a property tax credit for any real property owned by an eligible taxpayer, provided that the real property tax liability owed on the taxpayer's real property may be increased by no more than 2.5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is less. However, for any county in which any subclass of real property is considered to be valued below its true value in money, as determined in the act, the amount by which a taxpayer's real property tax liability may increase shall not exceed 5% per year, provided that this provision shall no longer apply to a county once such subclass of real property in such county is no longer considered to be valued below its true value in money.

Additionally, the act provides that no personal property tax liability owed on any individual item of personal property shall not be increased above the liability owed on such item during the 2024 tax year or the first year an eligible taxpayer first incurs personal property tax liability on such personal property, whichever occurs later. Any eligible taxpayer experiencing such an increase shall be eligible for a credit on the eligible taxpayer's personal property tax liability in an amount equal to such increase, as described in the act. (Sections 137.1058 and 137.1055)

STATE TAX COMMISSION RATIO STUDIES

Current law requires the State Tax Commission to equalize the valuation of each class and subclass of property among the respective counties. This act requires the Commission to utilize ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass is valued below or above its true value. Such values shall be no less than 75% and no more than 100% of true market value, as described in the act. (Section 138.390)

JOSHUA NORBERG

Citations: 137.016, 137.115, 137.1055, 137.1058, 138.390
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/30/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/30/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/25/2026 

03/11/2026 




01/08/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1410 - Sen. Sandy Crawford (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Summary: SCS/SBs 1410 & 853 - This act modifies provisions relating to property taxes.

PROPERTY TAX DEADLINES

Current law requires a county assessor to provide notification to a taxpayer by no later than June 15 if the assessor increases the taxpayer's real property valuation. This act requires such notice to be provided by no later than June 1. (Section 137.180)

Additionally, current law requires a taxpayer to file an appeal of the taxpayer's assessed valuation by no later than the second Monday in July. This act requires such appeal to be filed by no later than the first Monday in August. (Sections 137.275 to 138.180)

These provisions are identical to SB 853 (2026).

PROPERTY TAX INSTALLMENTS

Current law authorizes counties to provide for the payment of real and personal property taxes in installments, but excludes township counties from utilizing such payment plans. This act repeals such prohibition for township counties and allows the form of the installments to be determined by the governing body of the county. (Section 139.053)

This provision is substantially similar to SB 1211 (2026) and HB 388 (2025).

DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAX NOTICES

This act authorizes a collector to offer a trusted contact program to a taxpayer, who may designate one or more trusted contacts for the collector to contact in the event the taxpayer has not paid the taxpayer's property tax liability by March 1 of a calendar year. (Section 140.010)

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: 137.180, 137.275, 137.385, 138.180, 139.053, 140.010
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/30/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/30/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/12/2026 

03/11/2026 
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Select Committee on Property Taxes and the State Tax Commission




01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/05/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SJR68 - Sen. Rick Brattin (R) - Prohibits the taxation of unrealized gains
Summary: SCS/SJRs 68 & 96 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits any taxes from being imposed on any unrealized gains accrued on any asset prior to the sale of such asset.

This amendment is identical to SJR 53 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 4(e)
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

Bill History:
03/11/2026 
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

02/04/2026 

01/29/2026 

01/27/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

01/27/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SJR96 - Sen. Joe Nicola (R) - Prohibits the taxation of unrealized gains
Summary: SJR 96 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits any taxes from being imposed on any unrealized gains accrued on any asset prior to the sale of such asset.

This amendment is identical to SJR 53 (2025).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 4(e)
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Superseded by SJR 68

Bill History:
03/11/2026 
S - Superseded by SJR 68

02/11/2026 


01/27/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SJR111 - Sen. Brad Hudson (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Summary: SCS/SJR 111 - Current constitutional provisions require taxing jurisdictions to reduce property tax levies when the total assessed value of property in the taxing jurisdiction increases by more than the percent increase in inflation, with an exception made for levies imposed for the payment of principal and interest on bonds or other indebtedness. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, removes the exemption for debt service levies.

The amendment also provides that, beginning January 1 following the effective date of the amendment, taxing jurisdictions shall calculate levies for each subclass of real property, and shall reduce the levy for any such class if the assessed valuation for such class increases over the previous year, as provided in the amendment.

Additionally, this amendment requires the value of new construction and improvements to be included in the calculation of total assessed valuation for the purpose of calculating property tax levies. (Section 22)

This amendment is substantially similar to HJR 148 (2026).

JOSH NORBERG

Citations: ART X.SEC 22
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/30/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/30/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/12/2026 

03/11/2026 




02/05/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Introduced and Read First Time

HB2944 - Rep. Hardy Billington (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the local senior citizen homestead tax credit
Summary:

HCS HB 2944 -- SENIOR CITIZEN HOMESTEAD TAX CREDIT (Billington)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Under the provisions of this bill, once an eligible taxpayer qualifies for the Homestead Property Tax Credit for seniors citizens, such taxpayer must maintain his or her eligibility without needing to reapply each year. The tax credit must continue to be automatically applied to the eligible taxpayer?s homestead until the tax year in which such taxpayer relocates or dies, which must be certified within 90 days of the date of either event. If a credit is granted in error due to the taxpayer failing to notify the collector of relocation or death, the county can remedy the error.

This bill requires the tax statement to include a note informing the taxpayer that it is his or her responsibility to notify the county if he or she is no longer eligible for the tax credit.

The bill clarifies that real property tax imposed by a county or by a political subdivision within the county includes, but is not limited to: tax levies for debt service, tax levies for operating purposes, and tax levies for capital improvements and projects.

This bill requires the Department of Heath and Senior Services (DHSS) to establish a secure electronic portal that is accessible to each county if an appropriation is provided. This portal must allow county designees to access certain information to determine the death status of recipients of the senior property tax credit. If no appropriation is provided to establish this portal, DHSS must provide to each county a list of all individuals whose deaths were recorded within the county between July 1st of the preceding year to June 30th of the current year. This list must be provided by July 30th of each year.

The bill requires each county designee to implement procedures to determine whether a change of ownership has occurred for any homestead receiving the senior property tax credit before issuing the property tax statement each year.

This bill requires any payment of real or personal property taxes made through the United States Postal Service (USPS) to be postmarked by January 5th, and payments made through other means must be received by December 31st. The bill allows township collectors to accept partial or installment payments of real and personal property taxes prior to delinquency.

This bill allows counties to extend the deadline for real or personal property tax payments by no more than 30 days if a county experiences certain difficulties that delay the preparation of mailing of real or personal property tax statements.

The bill allows assessors or certain other county designees a grace period of no more than 10 days following the deadline for certain forms that are sent through USPS and postmarked prior to the due date.

Citations: 137.1050
Progress: House: 3rd Reading
Last Action:
03/30/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

Bill History:
03/30/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

03/30/2026 
H - Third Read and Passed - Y-145 N-4

03/30/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/25/2026 
H - Perfected

03/25/2026 
H - Committee substitute adopted

03/25/2026 
H - Floor Amendment(s) Adopted -1

03/25/2026 
H - Laid out for consideration

03/11/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/10/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/09/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4

03/04/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

02/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/24/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


02/16/2026 

02/10/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/06/2026 

02/03/2026 

01/14/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/13/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB1906 - Rep. Peggy McGaugh (R) - Modifies provisions relating to payments of real and personal property taxes
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass by Consent" by the Standing Committee on Local Government by a vote of 16 to 0.

Currently, any county other than a township county may, by order or ordinance, allow its taxpayers the option to pay any part of their real and personal property taxes on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis.

This bill allows township counties the option to pass such an order or ordinance.

This bill is similar to HB 388 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill simply allows township counties to offer the same service to taxpayers that all other counties are authorized to provide.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative McGaugh; Missouri Association of Counties; MO County Collectors Association; Darlene Shipp, Collector-Treasurer; Ike Skelton, Camden County Commission; and Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 139.053
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/31/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/31/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/04/2026 
H - Recommended for House Consent Calendar

03/04/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Consent and Procedure

03/03/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Consent and Procedure

02/26/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/03/2026, 4:00 PM - House - Consent and Procedure, HR 5

02/19/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Consent and Procedure

02/19/2026 
H - Recommended for House Consent Calendar

02/19/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Local Government

02/18/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Local Government

02/16/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/18/2026, 8:30 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5

02/11/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Local Government

02/05/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/11/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5

01/08/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Local Government

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2089 - Rep. Aaron Crossley (D) - Authorizes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption"
Summary: This bill creates the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption" which provides a tiered property tax exemption system for veterans with disabilities. The exemptions are based on a disability percentage, certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, an annual exemption will be granted for a property that is used as a qualified residence owned by a veteran with a disability, limited to the amounts as follows:

(1) For veterans with service-connected disability of 30% or more but less than 50%, the annual exemption is $2,500;

(2) For veterans with a service-connected disability of 50% or more but less than 70%, the annual exemption is $5,000;

(3) For veterans with service-connected disability of 70% or more, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the qualified residence; and

(4) For a taxpayer who is the surviving spouse of a veteran whose death was determined to be service-connected and who is certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as a recipient of dependency and indemnity compensation under federal law, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the qualified residence.

If a surviving spouse of a veteran sells the qualified residence, an amount can be transferred to his or her new residence as long as it is used as his or her primary residence and he or she does not remarry. No exemption will be allowed for the tax year in which the surviving spouse remarries.

The bill requires each taxpayer that is granted the exemption to reapply on an annual basis unless the veteran has a combined service-connected disability with a rating of 100% and is deemed permanently and totally disabled, as specified in the bill. The provisions of this bill sunset six years after the effective date.

This bill is similar to HB 700(2025) and HB 1419 (2024).
Citations: 137.109
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
04/01/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2306

Bill History:
04/01/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2306

04/01/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/31/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/26/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/31/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/24/26 - 3:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/24/2026, 3:30 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces


02/18/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2276 - Rep. Will Jobe (D) - Authorizes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption" relating to a property tax exemption for certain veterans
Summary: This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption" which provides a tiered property tax exemption system for veterans with disabilities. The exemptions are based on a disability percentage, certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, an annual exemption will be given for a property that is used as a qualified residence owned by a veteran with a disability, limited to the amounts as follows:

(1) For veterans with service-connected disability of 50% or more but less than 70%, the annual exemption is $2,500;

(2) For veterans with a service-connected disability of 70% or more but less than 100%, the annual exemption is $5,000;

(3) For veterans with service-connected disability of 100%, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the qualified residence; and

(4) For a taxpayer who is the surviving spouse of a veteran whose death was determined to be service-connected and who is certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as a recipient of dependency and indemnity compensation under Federal law, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the qualified residence.

If a surviving spouse of a veteran sells the qualified residence, an amount may be transferred to his or her new residence as long as it is used as his or her primary residence and he or she does not remarry. No exemption will be allowed for the tax year in which the surviving spouse remarries.

The bill requires each taxpayer that is granted the exemption to reapply on an annual basis unless the veteran has a service- connected disability rating of 100% and is deemed permanently and totally disabled, as specified in the bill.

The provisions of this bill sunset six years after the effective date.

This bill is similar to HB 552 (2025) and HB 1419(2024).
Citations: 137.109
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
04/01/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2306

Bill History:
04/01/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2306

04/01/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/31/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/26/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/31/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/24/26 - 3:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/24/2026, 3:30 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces


02/18/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/08/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2306 - Rep. Philip Oehlerking (R) - Authorizes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans' Homestead Exemption" relating to a disabled veteran residential real property assessed value exemption
Summary: This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption" which provides a tiered property tax exemption system for veterans with disabilities. The exemptions are based on a disability percentage, certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, an annual exemption will be given for a property that is used as a qualified residence owned by a veteran with a disability, limited to the amounts as follows:

(1) For veterans with service-connected disability of 30% or more but less than 50%, the annual exemption is the first $10,000 of the assessed value;

(2) For veterans with a service-connected disability of 50% or more but less than 70%, the annual exemption is the first $50,000 of the assessed value;

(3) For veterans with a service-connected disability of 70% or more but less than 90%, the annual exemption is the first $150,000 of the assessed value;

(4) For veterans with service-connected disability of 90% or more but less than 100%, the annual exemption is equal to the first $250,000 of the assessed value; and

(5) For veterans with service-connected disability of 100%, the annual exemption is equal to the first $500,000 of the assessed value.

The exemption carries over to the benefit of the disabled veteran's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence, permanently resides there, and does not remarry. No exemption will be allowed for the tax year in which the surviving spouse remarries. The exemption for a surviving spouse will remain proportional to the disabled veteran's disability rating as of the time of the veteran's passing.

If the person awarded the exemption subsequently becomes a resident of a facility licensed under Chapter 198, a Missouri veterans' home, or a facility operated by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, the exemption will continue: (1) If the residence continues to be occupied by the disabled veteran's spouse; or

(2) If the residence remains unoccupied but is still owned by the disabled veteran who qualifies for the exemption.

The bill requires each taxpayer that is granted the exemption to reapply on an annual basis and provide documentation specified in the bill.

This bill is similar to HB 552 and HB 921 (2025).
Citations: 137.109
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
04/01/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

Bill History:
04/01/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/31/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/26/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/31/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/24/26 - 3:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/24/2026, 3:30 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces


02/18/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/09/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2362 - Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R) - Authorizes the "Disabled Veteran Property Tax Relief Act" relating to a property tax exemption for certain veterans
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 16 to 1.

This bill establishes the "Disabled Veteran Property Tax Relief Act".

Beginning January 1, 2027, a disabled veteran is granted an annual property tax exemption on his or her primary residence that is proportional to the disabled veteran's disability rating. The proportional amount will be calculated as follows:

(1) For disabled veterans with a disability rating of less than 100%, the tax levied upon the primary residence must be reduced by a percentage equal to the veteran's disability rating; and

(2) For disabled veterans with a disability rating of 100%, the annual exemption must be equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the primary residence.

To verify eligibility, a disabled veteran must do the following no later than April 1st:

(1) Submit an application to the local assessor or collector;

(2) Include documentation verifying proof of the disability rating, including documentation from the US Department of Veterans Affairs; and

(3) Include proof of ownership and occupation of the primary residence.

The collector must review applications and determine eligibility of the residential property.

This exemption can carry over to the disabled veteran's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence, permanently resides therein, and does not remarry. No exemption will be allowed for a surviving spouse for the tax year in which he or she remarries. The exemption for a surviving spouse must remain proportional to the disabled veteran's disability rating as of the time of the veteran's passing. The exemption can not be transferred or assigned.

Knowingly providing false information to obtain the exemption will subject an individual to a penalty twice the amount of the exemption improperly received.

The provisions of this bill will sunset six years after the effective date.

This bill is similar to HB 921 (2025); HB 552 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that rising property taxes impact disabled veterans and their families across our state. This bill would provide relief to disabled veterans that they have earned through their service and sacrifice.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Schmidt; Tony Laszacs; Missouri National Guard Association; Blake Leitch, Parmele Disability Advocate; Charles Canady; Charles A Sanders; ABATE for Missouri; and Andy Davis.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that Missouri cannot afford to do this right now. The State is currently making cuts to the budget because our revenue is down. This could decimate small towns that rely heavily on these taxes for public services.

Testifying in person against the bill was Arnie Dienoff.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.1075
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/24/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

Bill History:
03/24/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/24/26 - 3:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/24/2026, 3:30 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces


02/18/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/10/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2535 - Rep. Don Mayhew (R) - Authorizes a homestead tax exemption for certain veterans, and to offset lost property tax revenue, increases the cigarette tax and subjects alternative nicotine products, vapor products, tobacco paraphernalia, and hemp-derived consumable products to an excise tax
Summary: This bill establishes the "Veterans and Gold Star Family Property Tax Relief Act".

The bill creates an annual exemption from the property taxes levied on the qualified residence of a disabled veteran, Purple Heart recipient, or Gold Star spouse. A Gold Star spouse is the surviving, unmarried spouse of a veteran who was killed in action, who died from wounds received in combat while serving on active duty, or who died as a result of diseases related to a presumed toxic exposure or injury due to a presumed toxic exposure while serving on active duty, and who is certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as a recipient of dependency and indemnity compensation under Federal law.

The exemption is limited to amounts based on disability rating as follows:

(1) For disabled veterans with a disability rating of 30% percent or more but less than 50% percent, the annual exemption will be $3,000 for a disability rating of 30% and the amount will be increased in proportion to the percentage of the disabled veteran's disability rating for disabled veterans with a disability rating of more than 30% but less than 50%, not to exceed $5,000;

(2) For disabled veterans with a disability rating of 50% percent or more but less than 70% percent or Purple Heart recipients, the annual exemption will be $5,000 for a disability rating of 50% and the amount will be increased in proportion to the percentage of the disabled veteran's disability rating for disabled veterans with a disability rating of more than 50% but less than 70%, not to exceed $10,000; and

(3) For disabled veterans with a disability rating of 70% or more or Gold Star spouses, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the property tax levied on the qualified residence.

The exemption carries over to the benefit of the disabled veteran's or Purple Heart recipient's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence, permanently resides therein, and does not remarry. The bill creates the "Veterans Property Tax Relief Fund" which will be used to reimburse counties or cities not within a county for verified property tax revenue lost as a result of the tax exemption. Additionally, the Missouri Veterans' Commission can retain an amount not to exceed 1% to offset the costs of administration of the tax exemption.

The bill creates new taxes on alternative nicotine products, hemp products, vapor products, tobacco products other than cigarettes, and tobacco paraphernalia. The tax will be 10% of the distributor's invoice price, before discounts and deals, with the money going to the Veterans' Property Tax Relief Fund.

This bill also raises taxes on cigarettes to five mills per cigarette with the money going to the Veterans' Property Tax Relief Fund.
Citations: 137.1077, 144.1420, 149.011, 149.015, 149.160
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

Bill History:
03/10/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/04/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

02/18/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/18/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2588 - Rep. Mike Jones (R) - Establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Tax Credit Act", authorizing counties to adopt a real property tax credit for certain disabled veterans who own a homestead
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 16 to 1.

This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Homestead Tax Credit Act".

The bill provides that for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, a county can grant an annual real property tax credit for the total amount of real property taxes levied on the residence by any county or political subdivision for disabled veterans if such county adopts an order, ordinance, or resolution authorizing such real property tax credit in such county.

The disabled veteran must have a 100% permanent and total service-connected disability and the market value of the property cannot exceed $500,000.

The tax credit can be used for a residence and up to five acres. If the total market value of the residence and surrounding acreage does not exceed $500,000 dollars, ownership of additional acreage will not disqualify an owner from eligibility under the provisions of this section.

The real property tax credit carries over to the benefit of the eligible owner's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence, permanently resides there, and does not remarry.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this will reduce strain on fixed income families of disabled veterans.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Jones; Missouri National Guard Association; Clay Williams, American Legion Post 331/Vfw 3176/ Dav 49; Blake Leitch, Parmele Disability Advocate; Charles Canady; Charles A Sanders; ABATE for Missouri; and Andy Davis.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that there needs to be a funding source to replace the lost tax revenue the counties are receiving.

Testifying in person against the bill was Arnie Dienoff. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.1053
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

Bill History:
03/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/24/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/24/26 - 3:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/24/2026, 3:30 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces


02/18/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/29/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2668 - Rep. Ben Keathley (R) - Modifies provisions governing property taxes
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS No. 2" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 9 to 6.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute No.2 for HB 2668.

Currently, certain counties, cities, political subdivisions, or other taxing districts may propose the imposition, continuation, or modification of a property tax to the voters at certain times of the year. This bill requires such proposals to be submitted to the voters at the general election in November. (Sections 64.401, 66.265, 67.457, 67.799 - 95.390, 137.037, 137.065, 137.565, 137.1040, 162.223 - 650.408, RSMo).

The bill prohibits any political subdivision or election authority from advertising or describing any proposed property tax as a ?no tax increase? tax proposal, except in certain circumstances. (Section 67.496).

The bill requires any question submitted to voters by a political subdivision desiring to levy a property tax to be submitted only on general election day. This requirement does not extend to township governments. (Section 115.123)

This bill requires that the election authority for a political subdivision or special district label ballot measures related to property taxation numerically or alphabetically. (Section 115.240).

Beginning January 1, 2027, the bill standardizes property tax- related ballot language and requires such ballot language to include certain elements as specified in the bill.

This bill requires ballot language to describe the desired tax as a specified amount per $100,000 or per $10,000 of appraised value, depending on whether the property is residential, commercial, agricultural, or a motor vehicle.

The bill prohibits any political subdivision or election authority from advertising or describing any proposed property tax as a ?no tax increase? tax proposal, except in certain circumstances. The bill requires ballot language statements to be fair, true, and accurate (Section 115.706).

This bill provides that each political subdivision that adopts or has adopted any tax abatement or similar economic incentive must decrease the levy of real property tax rates to reduce the amount of tax revenues such political subdivision received from the additional tax abatement revenue (Section 137.039).

This bill provides that all township governments may continue to submit property tax ballots in either April or November (Section 137.481).

This bill clarifies that any county authorized to impose a property tax must grant a property tax credit to all eligible taxpayers for certain increases to an eligible taxpayer?s real property tax liability. The bill further clarifies that in a county granting a real property tax credit, the county and each political subdivision levying a real property tax must apply the county?s or political subdivision?s proportional amount of the credit when calculating the eligible taxpayer?s property tax liability. The county and the political subdivision are prohibited from adopting any procedure that limits the definition or scope of eligible credit amounts or eligible taxpayers. As it relates to calculating the property tax levies, the total amount of credits authorized in the county must be considered tax revenue actually received by the political subdivision levying the tax.

This bill clarifies that real property tax imposed by a county or by a political subdivision within the county includes, but is not limited to: tax levies for debt service, tax levies for operating purposes, and tax levies for capital improvements and projects (Section 137.1050).

Currently, the eligible credit amount in "five percent counties" may be increased by no more than 5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is higher. The bill changes the language to provide that the eligible credit amount in "five percent counties" may be increased by no more than 5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is lower (Section 137.1055).

This bill contains a severability clause.

This bill is similar to HB 2780 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill addresses tax proposal language, ballot language, assessments, property tax payment mechanisms, and other issues raised by the public. Those in support of the bill state that moving the property tax elections to November will allow for greater voter turnout.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Keathley; Arnie Dienoff; Dennis Ganahl, Missouri Tax Relief Now.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say the bill will harm seniors who live in long-term care facilities, nursing homes, and assisted living facilities by increasing their taxes. Those in opposition further state the bill requires AirBnBs and VRBO properties to be assessed as residential properties even though they function as a business. The bill will cause issues once the education formula is rewritten and will cause ballot fatigue by moving all property tax elections to November. They also state that the bill does not make property taxation simpler or easier to understand.

Testifying in person against the bill were Steve Hobbs, Missouri Association Of Counties; Laura, Missouri Municipal League; David Mccracken, Leading Edge Missouri; Jorgen Schlemeier, Missouri Hotel And Lodging Association; Mike Lodewegen, Missouri Council Of School Administrators; Nikki Strong, Missouri Health Care Association; Tim Blattel, Twin Oaks Estate/Mala.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 115.123, 115.240, 115.706, 137.037, 137.065, 137.565, 137.570, 137.1040, 137.1050, 137.1055, 137.039, 137.481, 162.223, 162.441, 162.840, 164.021, 164.151, 167.231, 178.881, 182.010, 182.015, 182.020, 182.030, 182.100, 182.140, 182.650, 182.655, 182.715, 182.717, 184.350, 184.351, 184.353, 184.357, 184.359, 184.600, 184.604, 184.614, 190.040, 190.065, 190.074, 190.296, 198.260, 198.263, 198.310, 204.250, 205.563, 205.979, 206.070, 206.120, 210.860, 233.172, 233.200, 233.345, 233.455, 233.460, 233.510, 235.175, 238.232, 247.130, 247.350, 247.470, 247.550, 249.110, 249.929, 249.1106, 249.1150, 250.060, 256.445, 257.360, 257.370, 262.598, 263.452, 263.472, 278.240, 278.280, 321.225, 321.240, 321.241, 321.243, 321.244, 321.460, 321.610, 321.620, 64.401, 650.399, 650.408, 66.265, 67.799, 67.990, 67.1422, 67.1531, 67.1551, 67.1880, 67.457, 67.496, 68.235, 68.250, 71.800, 71.802, 80.460, 90.500, 92.010, 92.031, 92.035, 94.060, 94.070, 94.250, 94.260, 94.340, 94.350, 94.400, 95.150, 95.390
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/09/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4

02/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/25/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

02/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/24/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


02/18/2026 

02/05/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 2780

02/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/05/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/04/2026 

01/29/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/29/26 - 10:30 am or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/27/2026 

01/20/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/21/26 - 12:00 pm - Joint Committee Room (Room 117) - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform


01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

01/05/2026 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2672 - Rep. Mike Jones (R) - Establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Personal Property Tax Credit Act", authorizing counties to adopt a personal property tax credit for certain disabled veterans who own up to two motor vehicles
Summary: This bill creates the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Personal Property Tax Credit Act". For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, a county can authorize, by adopting an order, ordinance, or resolution, a personal property tax credit for eligible veterans in an amount equal to the credit percentage applied to the qualified tax liability for each qualified vehicle, up to two vehicles.

A veteran is eligible if he or she is a disabled veteran, is a resident of the county adopting an ordinance, owns and maintains a vehicle in this state, and is liable for the payment of personal property taxes on the vehicle. The vehicle must be in the name of the veteran or jointly with the veteran's spouse.

The tax credit percentage will be the same percentage as the eligible veteran's disability rating, not to exceed 100%.
Citations: 137.1054
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/25/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 3078

Bill History:
03/25/2026 
H - Superseded by HB 3078

03/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/24/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/24/26 - 3:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/24/2026, 3:30 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces


02/18/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

01/05/2026 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2709 - Rep. Rodger Reedy (R) - Modifies provisions governing the taxation of property
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 14 to 5.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2709 & 2671.

This bill requires any ballot seeking approval to add or change a tax of real property to express the effect of the change in the ballot in terms of real dollars owed per $100,000 of a property?s market valuation. (Section 137.067, RSMo)

Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase may levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate.

The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception, and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate.

Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction.

Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property, in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. Finally, personal property tax rates are not allowed to increase above the personal property levy of the previous year, even as a part of this revenue-balancing adjustment.

This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline.

Currently, the term "improvements" applies to both real and personal property. Additionally, the aggregate increase in valuation of personal property for the current year compared to the previous year must be equivalent to the new construction and improvements factor for personal property. The bill provides that the term "improvements" applies only to real property and repeals the provision setting the aggregate increase in valuation of personal property equal to the new construction and improvements factor for personal property.

This bill requires all voter-approved tax levy increases applied to any real and personal property to be applied to each subclass of property equally.

The bill provides that, if voters approve a subsequent levy increase prior to the expiration of a temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling must remain in effect until the temporary levy expires. At that time, the tax rate ceiling must be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase. If voters of a political subdivision are asked to approve an additional permanent tax rate ceiling increase prior to the expiration of a temporary levy increase, voters must be provided ballot language that indicates that the temporary levy must be made permanent if the permanent levy increase is approved.

A reduction or an increase to the tax rate ceiling in a nonreassement year must be applied in the following year of general reassessment.

This bill provides that, when voters pass an increase of a tax rate, the political subdivision must use the current tax rate ceiling and the approved increase to establish the rates of the levy for the tax year immediately following the election. If the assessed valuation of real property is reduced in the tax year following the election, the political subdivision can raise its levy rates so that the revenue received from its local real property equals the amount the political subdivision would have received from the increased rates of levy if there had been no reduction in the valuation. Using the increased tax rate ceiling must be revenue neutral. (Section 137.073, RSMo)

As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces the language with that relating to multiple tax rates. (Section 137.079, RSMo)

Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county may also opt out of implementing certain provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes.

The bill repeals the references to the provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and SB 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt out of such provisions. (Section 137.115, RSMo)

As it relates to borrowed money and issued bonds by school boards of certain districts, notice of the submission of the question of any loan for a ballot must include the amount of the loan required and the purpose of the loan. (Section 164.121, RSMo)

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill requires separate levies for the three subclasses of real property and for personal property, and this will allow each levy to rollback on its own. Supporters say this bill will make ballot language clearer and that taxation by subclass allows for a more effective use of the Hancock Amendment and will allow homeowners to see the benefit of their taxes.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Reedy; Missouri Association Of Counties; State Tax Commission; and Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessors Association.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the state depends on local governments to help fund education, and they voice wariness toward bills that limit local revenues.

Testifying in person on the bill was Mike Lodewegen, Missouri Council Of School Administrators.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.073, 137.079, 137.115, 137.067, 164.121
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/05/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/04/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 3/5/26 - 11:15 am or Upon Adjournment - HR 4 - House-Rules-Legislative


02/25/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

02/18/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

02/03/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/29/2026 

01/29/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/29/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/29/26 - 10:30 am or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

01/27/2026 


01/15/2026 

01/15/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

01/06/2026 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2859 - Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R) - Reduces the assessment percentage of certain personal property and provides a personal property tax exemption for certain personal property upon adoption of a constitutional amendment authorizing such exemption
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 7 to 3.

Beginning January 1st of the calendar year immediately following the adoption of a constitutional amendment authorizing the exemption of tangible personal property from taxation under Article X, Section 6 of the Constitution of Missouri, this bill will exempt farm machinery and motor vehicles from personal property taxation.

Currently, assessors annually assess all personal property at 33.3% of its true value in money. Beginning January 1, 2027, the percentage of the true value in money at which personal property is assessed will be 30% of its true value in money and the amount will be reduced every two years by 2% until the calendar year 2041. For calendar year 2041, and every year thereafter, personal property must be assessed at 16% of its true value in money.

This bill is similar to HB 988 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will allow for more predictability for taxpayers as it relates to their motor vehicles.

Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Matthiesen.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill will impact smaller communities that have limited or no sales tax base to replace the lost revenue caused by this bill.

Testifying in person against the bill were Missouri Council of School Administrators; and Missouri Municipal League.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.115, 137.102
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/23/2026 
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

02/17/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/16/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

02/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/16/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4

02/11/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

02/02/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Ways and Means

01/29/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Ways and Means

01/27/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/29/2026, 10:30 AM - House - Ways and Means, HR 1

01/25/2026 
H - Committee hearing cancelled - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

01/22/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

01/22/2026 

01/20/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means

01/15/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/20/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Ways and Means, HR 6

01/15/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Ways and Means

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB2869 - Rep. Mike Jones (R) - Provides a homestead exemption for disabled veterans
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Tax Reform by a vote of 9 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2869.

This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Homestead Tax Credit Act".

Beginning January 1, 2027, if adopted by county order, ordinance, or resolution, a county may grant an annual real property tax credit for the qualifying homestead of a disabled veteran that has an assessed value not to exceed $500,000. This $500,000 limit on assessed value must be adjusted annually for inflation.

The county may grant a tax credit for any percentage of the qualified amount that does not exceed 100% of the disabled veteran?s property tax liability. Before January of any year, the governing body of a county may adjust this tax credit percentage for the next general reassessment year by ordinance.

If the qualifying disabled veteran passes, this real property tax credit must carry over to the benefit of the surviving spouse as long as certain conditions are met.

This real property tax credit must not reduce assessed valuations and must not be construed as an exemption.

If an eligible owner receives this real property tax credit, he or she will no longer be eligible for any other real property tax relief or tax credit relating to the owner?s qualifying residence.

For the purpose of calculating property tax levies, the total amount of these real property tax credits must be considered tax revenue actually received by the county or other political subdivision.

This bill is similar to HB 2588 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill is a responsible, commonsense, and targeted road map to ensure disabled veterans are not taxed out of their homes. Those in support of the bill state that the bill ensures the homestead tax credit for disabled veterans would not have the same issues as SB 190. Supporters of the bill say veterans have been waiting for bills like this to actually pass. Those in support of the bill say this bill leaves the tax credit up to the counties to impose.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Jones; Troy Williams, Missouri Association of Veterans Organization; and Michael W Schroeder, Department of Missouri Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW).

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that Department of Revenue did not receive this bill and others from Legislative Oversight in a timely manner to ensure a fiscal note could be done. Department of Revenue believes there would be savings because those who take the tax credit proposed by this bill could not take some of the other property tax credits.

Testifying in person on the bill was Zachary Wyatt, Department Of Revenue.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.1052
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

Bill History:
03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

03/04/2026 

02/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/24/2026 

02/19/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/18/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 2/19/26 - 8:00 am - HR 1 - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform


01/12/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/08/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB2923 - Rep. Carolyn Caton (R) - Establishes the "Homestead Improvement Property Tax Relief Act" exempting qualifying improvements to a homestead from real property taxation
Summary: This bill establishes the "Homestead Improvement Property Tax Relief Act".

For each year of the exemption period established in the bill, the improvement value of a qualifying improvement to a homestead property must be exempt from real property taxation, not to exceed $75,000 in true value in money for any one homestead property. This exemption must not apply to the pre-improvement base value of the dwelling or the true value in money of the land.

To be eligible for the exemption, the property must be considered homestead property by the start date of construction of the qualifying improvement and on January 1 of each tax year the exemption is claimed. Additionally, the owner of the homestead property must file the necessary documentation.

The owner must file the Homestead Improvement Exemption intent form with the assessor prior to the issuance of a building permit or within 60 days after the start of construction (if no permit is required). The assessor must review the intent form and notify the owner of their approval or denial for the exemption based on the intent form.

The owner must submit a Homestead Improvement Exemption form and supporting documentation to the assessor within 180 days after completion of the improvement.

Exemption denials must only occur if there is inadequate documentation or the form shows the estimated cost of the improvement is $7500 or less.

The exemption for qualifying improvements must attach to the homestead property, and it must apply for four consecutive tax years as long as:

(1) The property remains a qualifying homestead property on January 1 of each year;

(2) The qualifying improvement is not destroyed or removed (except by a catastrophic event); or (3) The owner does not provide voluntary written relinquishment of the exemption. If such homestead property is damaged or destroyed by a catastrophic event, the true value in money of the improvements from before the catastrophic event must continue to be used as the pre-improvement base value during the tax year such event occurred.

If the owner replaces, reconstructs, or repairs the damaged dwelling on the same parcel of land within three years of the event, such replacements, reconstruction, or repairs must be treated as a qualifying improvement. The value of this improvement, not to exceed $75,000 for an insured dwelling or $200,000 for an uninsured dwelling, must be exempt for the four- year exemption period.

To determine the improvement value, the assessor must follow the procedures provided in the bill.

The State Tax Commission must adopt rules, regulations, procedures, and standard forms that are necessary to implement the provisions of this exemption.

This homestead improvement exemption must be in addition to other homestead, senior citizen, disability, or property tax relief programs.
Citations: 137.115, 137.1081
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/31/2026 

Bill History:
03/31/2026 

03/24/2026 
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 3/26/26 - 9:00 am - HR 1 - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

03/24/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 3/26/26 - 9:00 am - HR 1 - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

03/23/2026 

03/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

01/13/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/12/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB2964 - Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R) - Changes the dates upon which property taxes are due and delinquent
Summary: This bill changes the dates property taxes are billed and due. Currently, property taxes are billed at least 30 days prior to the delinquent date, are due on December 31st of each year, and are considered delinquent if they are delivered on or after January 1st. This bill moves the billing date to the end of February, the date taxes are due to the end of March, and the date the taxes are delinquent to April 1st.
Citations: 139.100, 140.010, 140.730, 52.230, 52.240, 52.285
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/04/2026 

Bill History:
03/04/2026 

02/26/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/24/2026 

02/19/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

01/14/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/13/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3078 - Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R) - Provides local property tax credits for certain disabled veterans
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 16 to 1.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3078 and 2672.

This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Homestead Tax Credit Act".

Beginning January 1, 2027, if adopted by county order, ordinance, or resolution, a county can grant an annual real property tax credit for the primary residence of a disabled veteran that has a market value not to exceed $500,000.

The tax credit can only be used for the primary residence and up to five acres. However, if the total market value of the dwelling and surrounding acreage does not exceed $500,000, ownership of additional acreage will not disqualify an owner from eligibility for the tax credit.

The county may grant a tax credit for any percentage of the qualified amount that does not exceed 100% of the disabled veteran?s property tax liability. Before January of any year, the governing body of a county may adjust this tax credit percentage for the next general reassessment year by ordinance.

If the qualifying disabled veteran passes, this real property tax credit must carry over to the benefit of the surviving spouse, as long as certain conditions are met.

This real property tax credit must not reduce assessed valuations and must not be construed as an exemption.

If an eligible owner receives this real property tax credit, he or she must no longer be eligible for any other real property tax relief or tax credit relating to the owner?s qualifying residence.

For the purpose of calculating property tax levies, the total amount of these real property tax credits must be considered tax revenue actually received by the county or other political subdivision. This bill creates the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Personal Property Tax Credit Act". For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, a county can authorize, by adopting an order, ordinance, or resolution, a personal property tax credit for eligible veterans in an amount equal to the credit percentage applied to the qualified tax liability for each qualified vehicle, up to two vehicles.

A veteran is eligible if he or she is a disabled veteran, is a resident of the county adopting an ordinance, owns and maintains a vehicle in this state, and is liable for the payment of personal property taxes on the vehicle. The vehicle must be in the name of the veteran or jointly with the veteran's spouse.

The tax credit percentage will be the same percentage as the eligible veteran's disability rating, not to exceed 100%.

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill lowers the tax burden for our disabled veterans. This would be an incentive for people to stay and retire in Missouri. A lot of nonprofit organizations are run by disabled veterans and this bill could bring more of those organizations to our state.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Schmidt; Missouri National Guard Assoc.; Blake Leitch, Parmele Disability Advocate; Charles Canady; Charles A Sanders; Abate For Missouri; and Andy Davis.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the legislature is already making cuts to the budget because the State has run out of money. The State cannot afford to do this right now. This could decimate smaller communities. We need this tax revenue to fund police and fire departments.

Testifying in person against the bill was Arnie C. Dienoff.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.1052, 137.1054
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

Bill History:
03/25/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/24/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/20/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/24/26 - 3:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

03/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/24/2026, 3:30 PM - House-Veterans and Armed Forces, HR 7

03/03/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Veterans and Armed Forces


02/18/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

01/27/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/22/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3342 - Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R) - Prohibits personal property tax levies passed prior to January 1, 1975, from applying to motor vehicles
Summary: This bill prohibits personal property tax levies passed by voters prior to January 1, 1975, from applying to motor vehicles.
Citations: 1.2070
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/05/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Bill History:
03/05/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

03/04/2026 

02/24/2026 

02/19/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/18/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3354 - Rep. Tim Taylor (R) - Modifies the tax levy for blind pensions
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 13 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3354.

Currently, the levy for blind pensions is set at a rate of $0.03 per $100 valuation of taxable property.

This bill changes the levy to 2.75 cents per $100 valuation of taxable property.

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the Blind Pension Fund is the only state property tax imposed, but the number of participants in the Blind Pension Fund is decreasing. Those in support of the bill state the bill rolls back the state property tax levy from $0.03 to $0.0275.

Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Taylor.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 209.130
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

Bill History:
03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

03/12/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

03/10/2026 

03/05/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

03/04/2026 

03/03/2026 

02/23/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/19/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3381 - Rep. Mark Meirath (R) - Allows county commissions to opt out of collecting late fees and penalties on delinquent property taxes
Summary: This bill allows the governing bodies of counties to, by order or ordinance, opt out of statutory provisions that require late fees and penalties on delinquent property taxes. The order or ordinance can establish criteria under which the fees and penalties will not be collected.
Citations: 49.301, 67.740, 82.1060
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/30/2026 
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 3/30/26 - 4:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 6 - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs

Bill History:
03/30/2026 
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 3/30/26 - 4:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 6 - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs


03/26/2026 

02/24/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/23/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HB3467 - Rep. Wendy Hausman (R) - Modifies provisions relating to county developmental disability resource board taxes
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Local Government by a vote of 16 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3467.

This bill allows a county or city not within a county to, under certain circumstances, ask voters to approve a sales tax of up to 0.5% for the purpose of providing assistance to people with developmental disabilities.

The first instance is one in which a property tax authorized for a developmental disability resource board experiences a decline in revenue, either from the amount generated during the 2026 fiscal year, for currently existing boards; or during the first full fiscal year that the tax is collected, for boards created after the effective date of the bill. In this circumstance, the board can request that the governing body of the county submit the question for the sales tax to voters. If approved, the sales tax can be collected in addition to the property tax.

Additionally, the governing body of a county or a city not within a county that does not currently have a developmental disability resource board can submit the question to authorize the sales tax to voters in lieu of the property tax currently authorized by law.

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the services provided by developmental disability resource boards are of vital importance to people with disabilities living in Missouri. Though funding can come from a variety of sources, relying on a local tax, approved by voters, means these groups don't have to rely on state appropriations to continue providing services. There is a great deal of uncertainty about the future of property taxes in Missouri, and a lot of interest in shifting toward sales taxes expressed by the General Assembly. This diversification of revenue would help disability resource boards survive in times of economic uncertainty. Allowing voters to approve or disapprove the sales tax levy means there would have to be local support in order for this change to take place.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hausman; Arnie C. Dienoff; Nancy Pennington, Missouri Association of County Developmental Disabilities Services; Missouri Special Districts Association; Mike Lederle; Missouri Association of Sheltered Workshop Managers; Starlink; and Heather Weddle.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 160.910, 162.755, 205.968, 205.974, 630.140, 630.407, 70.210
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Local Government

Bill History:
03/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Local Government

03/25/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Local Government

03/23/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5

03/11/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Local Government

03/09/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/11/2026, 8:00 AM - House - Local Government, HR 5

03/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Local Government

02/27/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/26/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time

HJR115 - Rep. Dave Griffith (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing a disabled veteran homestead exemption
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Tax Reform by a vote of 8 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HJR 115.



Currently, all real property used as a homestead of any citizen of this State who is a former prisoner of war and who has a total service-connected disability, is exempt from taxation.

Upon voter approval, this proposed constitutional amendment would exempt all real property used as a homestead, as defined in the resolution, from taxation for any military veteran who is a resident of this State and has a 100% service-connected disability as determined by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and any military veteran who is a citizen of this State and a former prisoner of war.

If the 100% disabled veteran is deceased, the surviving spouse can continue using the exemption on the homestead property, provided that the surviving spouse uses, occupies, and maintains the homestead on which the disabled veteran was granted the original exemption. If the exempt homestead is subsequently sold or if the surviving spouse discontinues use of the property as the primary homestead, the exemption will expire.

This bill is similar to HJR 6 (2025) and HJR 75 (2024).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will help many veterans who are 100% disabled, on a fixed income, and having to make difficult financial decisions to pay rising property taxes. Those in support of the bill say there has been no opposition voiced to this bill, and many counties have expressed an interest in this exemption.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Griffith; Troy Williams, Missouri Association of Veterans Org. (MAVO); Michael W Schroeder, Department of Missouri Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW).

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the bill is narrowly tailored. There are many special districts that operate across county lines, so it is important that there is consistency across counties.

Testifying in person on the bill was Missouri Special Districts Association.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: ART X.SEC 6
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/31/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

Bill History:
03/31/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

03/25/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 3/26/26 - 10:30 or Upon Adjournment - HR 4 - House-Rules-Legislative

03/25/2026 

03/23/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/24/2026 

02/19/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

02/18/2026 
H - ** REVISED for TIME ** - 2/19/26 - 8:00 am - HR 1 - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform


02/16/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HJR174 - Rep. Jonathan Patterson (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Summary: This constitutional amendment provides that, if all revenue triggers established by law to reduce and eliminate the current individual income tax are met and the top individual income tax rate is reduced below 1.4%, no state individual income tax will be imposed beginning January 1, 2031.

The amendment authorizes state and local sales and use taxes to be expanded by legislation to impose taxes on transactions involving any goods or services for the purpose of reducing and eliminating the state resident individual income tax.

Beginning July 1, 2029, this amendment requires any political subdivision that imposes a sales or use tax to adjust one or more of the following to reduce the amount of revenue generated to a level described in the bill:

(1) Sales or use tax rate;

(2) Any personal property tax levy;

(3) Residential real property tax levy; or

(4) Any earnings tax.

Beginning July 1, 2029, the amendment requires each sales and use tax rate imposed by the Missouri Constitution to be adjusted as specified in the bill. By July 1, 2028, the state auditor must determine such reduced rates that will go into effect January 1, 2029.

This amendment exempts any tax or revenue increase from legislation enacted to reduce and eliminate the state individual income tax within a set time from the requirements of certain limitations provided in the Missouri Constitution.

The resolution provides ballot language for this proposed constitutional amendment.
Citations: ART X.SEC 4(d), ART X.SEC 26
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/04/2026 
H - Superseded by HJR 173

Bill History:
03/04/2026 
H - Superseded by HJR 173

03/04/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Commerce

03/04/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Commerce

03/02/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 6

01/28/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Commerce

01/22/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Commerce

01/22/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/28/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 6

01/22/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/21/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time