NAACP

Position: Support (NAACP)

HB1951 - Rep. LaKeySha Bosley (D) - Establishes the "Missouri Dignity in Pregnancy and Childbirth Act"
Summary: This bill establishes the "Missouri Dignity in Pregnancy and Childbirth Act". Any hospital, clinic, or other health care facility that provides perinatal care, as defined in the bill, is required to implement an evidence-based implicit bias program for all health care providers involved in the perinatal care of patients within those facilities. The bill specifies what should be included in any implicit bias program.

This bill also requires the Department of Health and Senior Services to track data on severe maternal morbidity, as well as to track data on pregnancy-related deaths, and both are to include, but not be limited to, the conditions specified in the bill. The data collected will be published at least once every three years after it has been aggregated by state regions and disaggregated by racial and ethnic identity.

Furthermore, the bill requires that information entered into the electronic death registration system include information indicating whether the decedent was pregnant at the time of death, or within a year prior to the death, if known.

The bill also requires hospitals to provide each patient, upon admission or as soon thereafter as reasonably practical, written information regarding the rights of the patient, as specified in the bill. If a hospital chooses to include this information along with existing notices to the patient regarding patient rights, any newly required information must be provided when the hospital exhausts its existing inventory of written materials and prints new written materials.

This bill is similar to HB 255 (2025).
Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Health and Mental Health

HB2189 - Rep. Bob Bromley (R) - Establishes a five-year motor vehicle registration option for motor vehicles with a model year of manufacture that is less than six years old
Summary:

HB 2189 -- MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION (Bromley)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Government Efficiency

Beginning January 1, 2027, the Director of the Department of Revenue will be authorized to issue to owners of motor vehicles with a model year of manufacture less than six years, other than as provided in the bill, the option of a five-year registration period if the fee collected is equal to the annual registration fee plus a pro rata amount for the additional four years of the five-year registration, and presentation of all documentation otherwise required by law for vehicle registration.

The bill repeals the provision of law which requires that vehicles manufactured as an even-numbered model year must be renewed each even-numbered calendar year and that vehicles manufactured as an odd-numbered model year must be renewed each odd-numbered calendar year.

This bill is similar to HCS HB 247 (2025).

Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 

HB2302 - Rep. Philip Oehlerking (R) - Requires the department of corrections to provide certain services to inmates prior to their release from the department
Summary:

HB 2302 -- INMATE RELEASE FROM THE CUSTODY OF DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (Oehlerking)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Corrections and Public Institutions

This bill requires the Department of Corrections to provide certain inmates, as specified in the bill, with relevant documentation to assist in obtaining post-release employment.

The Department must coordinate with the Department of Revenue to provide a state-issued identification card if the inmate does not have a current one.

Nine months prior to an inmate's release from custody, the Department of Corrections will determine whether the inmate has a current state ID and, if not, begin gathering the required documentation to receive one. A certified birth certificate and a Department of Corrections-issued record card will be valid identification documentation for an inmate to obtain a state ID

State-issued ID cards issued with a record card from the Department of Corrections must be valid for a period of six years and are nonrenewable and nontransferable.

The Department of Corrections can utilize any funds to cover the purchase of ID cards, including but not limited to, inmate trust funds, existing funds of the Department, and donations.

The Department must provide an inmate with the types of documentation specified in the bill to assist in post-release employment.

The bill specifies that a delay in obtaining the documents required by this bill must not be cause for a delay in an inmate's release through probation or parole.

This bill is similar to HB 2502 (2024).

Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

HB2592 - Rep. Melanie Stinnett (R) - Restores voting rights to individuals on probation and parole
Summary:

HCS HBs 2592, 2787 & 2834 -- VOTER QUALIFICATIONS (Stinnett)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Corrections and Public Institutions

Currently, a person on probation or parole for a felony conviction is not entitled to vote until he or she is finally discharged. A person convicted of a felony or misdemeanor connected with the right of suffrage is permanently barred from voting.

This bill allows a person on probation or parole to vote, unless they were convicted of a felony or misdemeanor connected with the right of suffrage.

This bill is similar to HB 617 (2025).

Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

HB2747 - Rep. Bishop Davidson (R) - Modifies provisions relating to proceedings resulting from criminal conduct
Summary:

HCS HBs 2747 & 2047 -- PROCEEDINGS RESULTING FROM CRIMINAL CONDUCT (Davidson)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Economic Development

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2747 & 2047.

The bill specifies that, starting January 1, 2031, the Office of State Courts Administrator (OSCA) and the Missouri State Highway patrol must submit an annual report to the Joint Committee on the Justice System, the House Judiciary Committee, and the Senate Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence Committee. This report must include specified statistical information, including the number of eligible offenses identified, the number of records objected to for automatic expungement, and the number of expungement orders issued.

Currently, in a criminal prosecution for murder in the first degree, the court must instruct the jury that, in the event it cannot reach a consensus on punishment, the court may assess punishment, including death. This bill repeals that provision and provides a procedure for when a jury cannot reach a unanimous decision on punishment.

This bill also establishes an automatic record-clearing or expungement process for closing records pertaining to a "clean slate eligible offense", which is an offense not excluded from the eligibility for expungement. This process will be phased in and an individual can be granted more than one expungement under this bill, subject to specified parameters and expectations. This bill also provides that, on a quarterly basis, the Highway Patrol must identify records that have become eligible in the last quarter and make these records accessible to the central repository and every prosecuting agency in the State within 100 days of the record becoming eligible for automated expungement. If a court finds, after a motion, a conviction was improperly or erroneously expunged under this provision, the court must reinstate the conviction.

The bill provides that a credit bureau can report records of arrests, indictments pending trial, and convictions for no more than seven years from the date of final disposition. A credit bureau can no longer report these records if at any time after conviction, indictment, or arrest it is learned that a full pardon or expungement has been granted for the conviction. This bill creates in the State Treasury the "Missouri Expungement Fund", which is a fund dedicated to the creation, operation, and maintenance of the program. OSCA, the Department of Public Safety, and the Information Technology Services Division within the Office of Administration will expend money from the Fund, upon appropriation.

This bill is similar to HCS#2 HB 953 (2025).

Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 

HB2796 - Rep. Marlon Anderson (D) - Designates November24th each year as "Frankie Muse Freeman Day" in Missouri
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Tourism by a vote of 13 to 0.

This bill designates November 24th each year as "Frankie Muse Freeman Day" in Missouri.

This bill is similar to HB 1203 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that Frankie Muse Freeman was an amazing civil rights attorney who stopped racial discrimination in housing. She worked hard to make sure there was social justice in all parts of life. This bill will help educate future generations about the accomplishments of Frankie Muse Freeman.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Anderson; Miguel Arellanes; and NAACP.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Special Committee on Tourism

HB2967 - Rep. Cameron Parker (R) - Establishes the "Missouri Expungement Fund"
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Financial Institutions by a vote of 15 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2967.

This bill creates in the State Treasury the "Missouri Expungement Fund", the funds of which will be used by the Office of State Courts Administrator, the Department of Public Safety, and the Information Technology Services Division within the Office of Administration on the statewide court automation system and the Missouri criminal history record information system for the purposes specified in the bill.

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill is important to set forth the effort to provide funding to the entities involved in expunging records to get the technology needed to set up an automatic expungement system. This would streamline the process for an individual's record to be expunged.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Parker; and Eric Jennings, Judicial Conference of Missouri.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/04/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Financial Institutions

HB3074 - Rep. Yolonda Fountain Henderson (D) - Designates April thirteenth each year as William Lacy Clay, Sr. Day
Summary: This bill designates April 30th each year as "William Lacy Clay Sr. Day".
Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/11/2026 

SB1001 - Sen. Adam Schnelting (R) - Creates new provisions relating to homeownership
Summary: SCS/SB 1001 - This act creates various new provisions relating to homeownership.

AMERICAN DREAM TAX CREDIT AND SAVINGS ACCOUNTS

(Section 143.1155 and 443.1010)

This act establishes the American Dream Savings Account Act. Beginning January 1, 2027, any individual may open a savings account and designate the account as an American dream savings account to be used to pay or reimburse a qualified beneficiary's eligible expenses, as defined in the act.

This act also creates an income tax deduction for taxpayers who make contributions to such savings account. The deduction shall not exceed the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income for the tax year the deduction is claimed and shall not exceed $5,000 or $10,000 for married individuals filing jointly. Each taxpayer claiming the deduction shall file an affidavit with the income tax return verifying the amount of their contributions.

An account holder shall designate a beneficiary of the account no later than April 15 of the year following the tax year in which the account was opened.

The maximum amount an individual may contribute to an account in a single tax year is $5,000 for an individual or $10,000 for a couple filing a joint tax return. The maximum amount of all contributions to an account for all tax years is $30,000. An account shall not contain more than $30,000.

The title of any home purchased with moneys from an account may not transfer for at least two years, absent reasonable circumstances.

Moneys withdrawn from an account shall be subject to recapture and penalties if the moneys are used for any purpose other than those specified in the act.

No financial institution shall be required to designate an account as an American dream savings account in its contracts or systems, to track the use of moneys withdrawn from an account, or to report any information that it is not otherwise required to by law.

The income tax deduction created by this act shall sunset December 31, 2032, unless reauthorized by the General Assembly.

These provisions are substantially similar to the "First-Time Home Buyer's Tax Credit and Savings Account (HB 1796, 2018), which expired in August, 2024.

AMERICAN DREAM ACT

(Section 442.703)

The act creates the "American Dream Act." Institutional buyers, as that term is defined in the act, are prohibited from owning more than 100 single-family residential properties within Missouri. Institutional buyers are required to submit annual reports to the Secretary of State, with such information as stipulated in the act. Failure to file the required report may result in a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000 per violation.

The Attorney General is given authority to investigate and enforce compliance with this act. If, upon filing of a cause of action by the attorney general, a court finds that a single-family residential property was acquired in violation of this section, the court shall order the sale of the property within ninety days of the order. The court may additionally order such injunctive relief or any other remedy provided by law, as deemed appropriate. If an institutional buyer has been found by a court to be in violation of this act on 3 or more occasions, the court may fine the institutional buyer in an amount of $50,000 per occasion.

This provision does not apply to any entity engaged in the development or construction of residential properties or developments, or any affiliates thereof, provided the entity or affiliate is not otherwise a subsidiary or affiliate of an institutional buyer.

This act contains a severability clause.

SCOTT SVAGERA

Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
S - Reported Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1613 - Sen. Angela Mosley (D) - Designates each November 24th as "Frankie Muse Freeman Day" in Missouri
Summary: SB 1613 - This act designates November 24th of each year as "Frankie Muse Freeman Day" in Missouri.

This act is identical to HB 2796 (2026).

JIM ERTLE

Position: Support (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
S - Recommended for Senate Consent Calendar

Position: Oppose (NAACP)

HB1767 - Rep. Ed Lewis (R) - Enacts the Missouri Educators and Parental Empowerment and Rights Act
Summary: This bill establishes the "Missouri Educators and Parental Empowerment and Rights Act" which recognizes the profound effect parents and teachers have on the educational success of Missouri's children and the important role that education plays in our preservation of rights and liberties.

The bill also includes the "Parents' Bill of Rights" and the "Educators' Bill of Rights", which outline specific rights for parents of school children including but not limited to: having knowledge of what is being taught; viewing, and upon request, receiving copies of school records; and being informed about the child's safety. Educator rights include, but are not limited to: freedom from student abuse; classroom preparation time during contract hours; and to teach in a safe, secure, and orderly environment.

The bill requires school districts and charter schools in the State to develop policies and procedures to foster and maintain collaboration between parents and teachers and enumerate parental rights and educator rights.

Policies include notification to parents of serious disciplinary incidents and procedures for parental visits during school hours. Additionally, the bill provides that policies and procedures be published on the school website and teachers, school administrators, parents, and students be informed of their rights.

The bill outlines a student code of conduct that will set forth expectations for behavior consistent with ethical responsibility, community standards, and respect for school authority. The code of conduct must include: high expectations of personal responsibility; encouraging students to uphold traditional values such as honesty, diligence, and civility; measures to address and correct disruptive behavior; and clearly prohibit any policy or program that differentiates treatment of students primarily on the basis of race or other immutable characteristics, ensuring that all disciplinary measures are applied equally and fairly to every student.

School counselors and other qualified personnel must offer interventions that emphasize respect for others, problem solving, and perseverance. School boards and charter schools must adopt board policies by the beginning of the 2027-28 school year, as outlined in the bill.

The bill requires that schools must make efforts to facilitate parental engagement through regular communication, opportunities for parents to review the policy handbook, and the provision of resources that support ethical responsibility and community standards at home. Schools also must ensure that teachers and staff are trained to maintain order, encourage compliance, foster civility, and encourage personal responsibility.

This bill is similar to HCS HB 1287 (2025).
Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 

HB2086 - Rep. Ben Keathley (R) - Establishes provisions relating to continuing legal education requirements for attorneys licensed to practice law in this state
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Judiciary by a vote of 7 to 6.

This bill specifies that no person admitted and licensed to practice law in this state will be required, as part of his or her continuing legal education, to obtain credit devoted exclusively to explicit or implicit bias, diversity, inclusion, or cultural competency. These provisions amend Missouri Supreme Court Rule 15.05, relating to continuing legal education requirements for attorneys, and these provisions will govern in the event of a conflict between the statute and the rule as the rule relates to these specific credits.



PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this would eliminate the requirement that CLEs related to bias and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) be included. It is amending the Missouri Supreme Court rule. It does not get rid of the offerings of the CLE topics but it would be optional. The intent is to allow more of the hours to be spent on topics that are relevant to the attorneys' individual practice of law. They are largely a distraction from more substantial legal issues and these are more politically motivated. A lot of these have become outright political, rather than hinting at politics, and that is a problem. It does not eliminate the extra hour; they would still need to do 15 hours. CLEs are not an effective way to move cultural discussions. This is not the framework to make cultural changes. CLEs are meant for lawyers to stay up to date on their topic areas. Attorneys should treat clients like every other human being, and it should not matter what the client looks like or believes, and attorneys should be given options rather than a mandate. The choice should be left to the attorney to determine his or her destiny to make the attorney the most well-rounded attorney.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Keathley; Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that it is important to keep these as a requirement and it allows people to be more creative with offerings. It is not always about an individual person?s implicit biases and more about how the system works against people. Testifying in person against the bill was Missouri NAACP State Conference.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Judiciary

HB2122 - Rep. John Black (R) - Allows electrical corporations to charge for services based on the costs of certain construction work in progress
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Utilities by a vote of 12 to 7.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2122 & 1626.

This bill establishes the "Missouri Nuclear Clean Power Act", which allows clean baseload electric generating plants or facilities rated at 600 megawatts or less that utilize clean baseload electric generating plants to produce energy not in commercial operation as of August 28, 2026, to include in the corporation's rate base any amounts recorded to construction work in progress. The Public Service Commission will determine the amount of construction work in progress as specified in the bill. Base rate recoveries arising from the inclusion of construction work in progress in base rates are subject to refund.

These provisions will expire on December 31, 2036, unless the Commission determines that good cause exists to extend these provisions through December 31, 2046. The secretary of the Commission must notify the Revisor of Statutes if the conditions for the extension have been met.

This bill is the similar to HCS HB 50 (2025).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that with the retiring baseload generating plants, additional capacity is needed to just meet the state's current energy need, not accounting for any growth in energy demand. This bill will allow for investor-owned utilities to include construction costs for nuclear power generation in rates, lowering the interest amounts accrued and saving money.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Black; City Utilities of Springfield; Missouri Association of Municipal Utilities; Associated Industries of Missouri; Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that nuclear power is the direction the country and the world is moving for power generation and there is a need to develop a workforce to meet the new demand. In addition, Ameren Missouri's upcoming revision to its Integrated Resource Plan will include plans to build a nuclear plant in the next 20 years.

Testifying in person on the bill were Kurt Schaefer, Missouri Department of Natural Resources; Mohammad Dehghani, Missouri S&T; and Ameren Missouri.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2355 - Rep. Holly Jones (R) - Creates provisions relating to a MO HealthNet waiver for nutrition services
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Health and Mental Health by a vote of 11 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2355.

This bill establishes the "Food is Medicine Act", requiring the Department of Social Services to apply to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, within the Federal Department of Health and Human Services, for a Section 1115 demonstration waiver to implement the "Food is Medicine" program.

The program must be designed to improve health outcomes for MO HealthNet participants with nutrition-related chronic diseases through nutrition services.

The bill specifies the covered nutrition services under this program, and specifies that whenever feasible, the MO HealthNet Division, within the Department of Social Services must prioritize the inclusion of community-based organizations and local growers to support the purchase of locally grown food.

The bill requires the Department of Social Services to promulgate all the necessary rules and regulations for the administration of this bill.

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that "food is medicine" is not a slogan, but a new way of thinking of public health. The system has been structured to treat illness after it has appeared, rather than focus on preventive measures, which cost less than treatment efforts. The State has high rates of food insecurity and high rates of disease, and chronic disease is a primary driver of spending. The bill would create a stable and consistent market for locally produced food, strengthening the agricultural economy as well.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Jones; Kids Win Missouri; Adam Saunders, Columbia Centers For Urban Agriculture; Amanda Berry, Empower Missouri; Billy Polansky, Columbia Center For Urban Agriculture; Corrina Smith, Columbia Farmers Market; Lexi Linsenman, Columbia Center For Urban Agriculture; American Heart Association; Kanbe's Markets; Missouri Chapter of The American Academy of Pediatrics; BJC Healthcare Systems; and Feeding Missouri.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2498 - Rep. Brad Christ (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the certification of a juvenile for trial as an adult
Summary:

HB 2498 -- CERTIFICATION OF A JUVENILE FOR TRIAL AS AN ADULT (Christ)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Children and Families

Currently, if a juvenile who is not currently certified as an adult is taken into custody for an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult, the arresting officer is required to take fingerprints for the central repository. This bill requires the fingerprints to be taken when the offense would a class A or B felony, a felony sexual offense, or two felony offenses committed within 180 days of each other, if committed by an adult. The bill also repeals a provision requiring the fingerprint card to be made in such a way so as to not reveal the juvenile's name to the central repository.

The bill also authorizes a court to order a hearing to determine whether a juvenile should be certified as an adult if a motion is filed by the office of the prosecuting attorney or the office of the Attorney General if the Attorney General is acting as a special prosecuting attorney. Currently, the juvenile officer is permitted to consult with the prosecuting attorney about any offense for which a juvenile could be certified as an adult. This bill requires the juvenile officer to consult with the prosecuting attorney about any such offense, and it allows the prosecuting or circuit attorney to have access to any completed Missouri Juvenile Detention Assessment (JDTA) form that was used in determining detention. Use of the JDTA or any other assessment will be used as a guideline but is not mandatory. The juvenile officer and the court that has jurisdiction over the juvenile must report all adjudication, delinquency, and custody information to the central repository, and all information reported under the provisions of this bill will be available to criminal justice agencies through the Missouri Uniform Law Enforcement System (MULES) for the administration of justice.

Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 

HB2682 - Rep. Darin Chappell (R) - Renames the "Missouri Student Religious Liberties Act" the "Missouri Safeguarding Personal Expression at K-12 Schools (SPEAKS) Act" and creates provisions safeguarding students' political and ideological expression at public schools
Summary:

HCS HB 2682 -- PERSONAL EXPRESSION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS (Chappell)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on General Laws

This bill renames the "Missouri Student Religious Liberties Act" to the "Missouri Safeguarding Personal Expression at K-12 Schools (SPEAKS) Act". The Act adds political and ideological expression to the current protections for public school students' religious expression.

The bill additionally prohibits discrimination against student clubs on the basis of their religious, political, or ideological viewpoints or any requirement that the members of the club adhere to the club's sincerely held beliefs, comply with the club's conduct standards, or further the club's mission, as such mission is defined by the club.

This bill must not be construed to limit school districts' ability to restrict speech that is not protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; speech that is so offensive that a student is effectively denied equal access to educational opportunities; or conduct that intentionally, materially, and substantially disrupts school operations or the expressive activity of another individual in a campus space exclusively reserved for such activity.

Any person or student organization harmed by a violation of this Act will have a private cause of action against the school, as specified in the Act. Any person or student organization aggrieved by a violation of this Act may assert such violation as a defense or counterclaim in any disciplinary action or in any civil or administrative proceeding. The State waives immunity under Federal law and consents to be sued in Federal court for claims arising under this Act.

This bill is similar to SB 909 (2026).

Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

HB2868 - Rep. Cameron Parker (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the collection of DNA samples in criminal cases
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Crime and Public Safety by a vote of 17 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2868.

Currently, a biological sample must be collected from every person who is found guilty of a felony or any unlawful sexual offense or from every person who is at least 17 years old who is arrested for burglary in the first degree or burglary in the second degree or a felony offense under Chapter 565, 566, 567, 568, or 573, RSMo. Under this bill, a biological sample must be collected from every person who is found guilty of an unlawful sexual offense as well as for every person who is at least 17 years old who is arrested for a felony: controlled substance offense, fraud or misrepresentation offense, stealing offense, forgery offense, resisting or interfering with arrest, or driving while intoxicated offense. If it is determined that a person's biological sample has been included in the relevant database and has not been subject to a court order expunging the record from the database, no additional sample will be required.



The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that, currently, Missouri allows the collection of DNA for certain offenses and the statute details how the samples should be handled. This bill attempts to change the law to allow the collection for every felony you are arrested for. All 50 states allow for DNA samples for felony convictions, but 19 states, including our neighboring states, allow for the collection upon felony arrest. This would deter crime and lower the crime rate. There is a 2013 US Supreme Court case that says this is standard procedure and this does not violate the 4th Amendment. This will help convict people but it will also help exonerate those who are wrongfully imprisoned. States that do it upon arrest have solved thousands of cold cases as a result. The Office of Inspector General does an annual audit of this system, and this DNA is not like the DNA samples for the family tree websites; these are just markers to identify you. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Parker; Arnie Dienoff-State Public Advocate; Action Now Initiative; Ashley Spence, DNA Justice Project.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that due process requires a balance between privacy and public safety, but there should be an erring on the side of the defendant. There are concerns about overreach. DNA being in the system could lead to the wrongful conviction of innocent people because charges are not a conviction. The letter of the law allows us to have clarity on issues, and that is what will be argued in court. Not spirit and not intent. CODIS should be expanded, and many people deserve justice, but this should not be the way. It?s a complicated issue that needs to be addressed. This currently violates the presumption of innocence.

Testifying in person against the bill were Sage Coram, American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri; MO NAACP.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the Highway Patrol can provide information and answer questions that were asked during testimony. Missouri is missing out on information for investigative matters. This would aid approximately 731 investigations annually. There was some confusion for the Highway Patrol for when to collect, and that has been cleaned up. Any samples that are mistakenly collected are then tossed.

Testifying in person on the bill were Alexander Vivas, Missouri State Highway Patrol; and Joshua Kezer.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB3005 - Rep. Doyle Justus (R) - Establishes provisions relating to the reconsideration of materials in a public library or public school library
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 10 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3005.

This bill establishes provisions relating to the reconsideration of materials in a public library or public school library. The bill defines "digital library material" as material including, but not limited to, digital audiobooks, electronic journals, electronic magazines, and other resources that are directly accessible through the public library or school library database, but excluding any online content that is available outside of the public library or school library database or platform.

This bill defines "library material" as any resource in print or non-print format, including, but not limited to, books, magazines, microfiche, microfilm, slides, exhibits, and other materials that are found in a public library or school library.

The bill defines "reconsideration" as a process in which library personnel, public schools, school districts, or library governing bodies review materials in a public library or school library due to a formal complaint filed by a member of the community. The outcome of this reconsideration may include relocating or removing library materials or removing or restricting access to digital library materials.

This bill requires all public libraries and public school libraries to establish a policy outlining the process for library materials and digital library materials to undergo reconsideration based on a complaint made about library materials or digital library materials from a member of the community.

The policy must be made publicly available as provided in the bill. A public library or school library will remove library materials from its permanent collection, relocate library materials within its collection, or remove or restrict access to digital library materials within its collection only if the materials have been reviewed in accordance with an established policy for the reconsideration of library materials and digital library materials that comply with the requirements of the bill. To request reconsideration of library materials or digital library materials, the individual making the request must sign an affidavit affirming that: the individual has read or consumed the entirety of the challenged material; and the individual resides in the taxing district of the public library in which the request is made or the school district in which the request is made. Each public library or school library must develop an appeals process for the reconsideration policy that outlines a process for appealing a decision made regarding the removal of library materials or digital library materials, as specified in the bill.

Digital library resources will not track or monitor the access of library materials or digital library materials by individual users, especially minors, including any tracking or monitoring to personalize user experiences. An individual who is an employee or volunteer of a public library or school library must not be subject to termination, demotion, discipline, retaliation, or any other penalty for refusing to remove library materials or digital library materials before the materials have been reviewed in accordance with a policy that complies with the provisions of this bill.

This bill is similar to HB 1146 (2025) and SB 159 (2025).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will provide clear and transparent policies for libraries trying to ensure that the material and content located therein is up to certain standards. This will promote local control of such matters so that a library might create a safe environment for kids to learn and grow.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Justus; Sarah Colbert, Missouri Association of School Librarians; Missouri Library Association; Scott Bernier, EBSCO Information Services.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HCR48 - Rep. Michael Davis (R) - Urges Congress to pass voter identification laws
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Redistricting by a vote of 6 to 3.

This resolution commends the United States House of Representatives for passing the SAVE Act and urges the United States Senate to follow suit.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that only citizens should be entitled to vote, and proving citizenship is a straightforward and easy process. Additional safeguards to ensure that only citizens are voting increases confidence in elections and far outweighs any inconvenience this may entail. This proposal enjoys widespread and bipartisan support among the public.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Davis; and Arnie C. Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this is a solution in search of a problem. Not all people entitled to vote will have access to the documents necessary to prove citizenship. This could disenfranchise eligible voters without providing tangible benefits to elections.

Testifying in person against the bill were Suzanne Opperman; American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri; Alison Kaiser; Marilyn Mcleod; Atsuki Mori; and Karen Sicheneder.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HJR124 - Rep. Bennie Cook (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment specifying the election, powers, and duties of a county sheriff
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Crime and Public Safety by a vote of 12 to 4 with 1 member voting present.

Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment would require each county to elect a sheriff for a term of four years in perpetuity.

The amendment would also prohibit any method of removing a sheriff from office except by a writ of quo warranto initiated by the Attorney General.

The provisions of this amendment would not apply to St. Louis City, St. Louis County, or St. Charles County.



PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this is a constitutional amendment that would require the removal of elected county sheriffs, other than charter counties, to be initiated by the Attorney General. The sheriffs remain accountable to the voters and they are still subject to removal through the proper channels. Sheriffs should not be appointed, selected, or chosen by the political lobby. They should be elected by and should answer to the people. That is how a constitutional republic should work. In times of crisis there should be no question about who is in charge. This protects sheriffs from political retaliation.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Cook; Kristine Bunch; Arnie Dienoff; and Michael Bonham.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

SB949 - Sen. Rick Brattin (R) - Creates the offense of judicial malfeasance
Summary: SB 949 - This act creates the offense of judicial malfeasance. A person commits the offense if the person, while performing the duties of a judge, releases an individual who is a prior or persistent offender during the pendency of a criminal trial and such individual commits a felony during such release. The offense of judicial malfeasance shall be a class E felony. Any person charged or convicted with the offense of judicial malfeasance shall be referred to the Commission on Retirement, Removal, and Discipline for disqualification, removal, and suspension.

TRISTAN BENSON, JR.

Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
SB986 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to elections
Summary: SB 986 - This act modifies various provisions relating to elections.

VOTER REGISTRATION - DOCUMENTARY PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP (Sections 115.013 to 115.160)

The act requires documentary proof of United States citizenship, as that term is defined in the act, in order to register to vote, provided that persons already registered to vote and those seeking to transfer voter registration within the state are not required to provide such proof.

Additionally, all information required to be provided on a voter registration form shall be personally provided by the person seeking to register.

MAINTENANCE OF VOTER REGISTRATION LISTS (Sections 115.195 and 115.221)

The clerk of each circuit court in the state is required to prepare and transmit to the SOS a complete list of all persons who identify themselves as not being citizens of the United States when called to jury duty. This report shall be sent on a monthly basis.

If an election authority determines that a person who is not eligible to vote registered to vote or voted in an election, the election authority shall execute and deliver to the Attorney General, SOS, and the relevant prosecuting or circuit attorney an affidavit stating the relevant facts.

REFERRAL OF VIOLATION OF ELECTION LAWS (Section 115.642)

Current law provides that if the SOS finds that reasonable grounds appear that the alleged election offense was committed, the SOS may issue a probable cause statement and refer the offense to the appropriate prosecuting attorney. This act permits referral to the appropriate prosecuting attorney or the Attorney General.

This act is substantially similar to SCS/SB 62 (2025).

SCOTT SVAGERA

Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/09/2026 

SB1051 - Sen. Curtis Trent (R) - Creates provisions relating to protections against discrimination in educational settings
Summary: SB 1051 - This act requires all public schools, school districts, and public institutions of postsecondary education to treat discrimination motivated by antisemitism, as such term is defined in the act, in an identical manner to racially motivated discrimination. Schools and institutions shall include antisemitism-related conduct and penalties in their codes of conduct for students, faculty, and employees, as provided in the act, and shall prohibit behaviors that disrupt normal educational activity or create fear or intimidation.

Criticism of Israel comparable to that of other countries shall not be considered antisemitism. The act shall not be construed to infringe on First Amendment rights or conflict with existing discrimination laws.

The act further provides that no public school or public institution of postsecondary education shall discriminate because of race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, disability, religion, or marital status in any program, admission, class, or service, including counseling and financial aid. While specialized programs, such as programs for gifted or disabled students, are allowed, equal access shall otherwise be maintained.

To ensure compliance, each educational institution shall report incidents and complaints of antisemitism to the appropriate Title VI coordinator at either the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) or the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development (DHEWD). If an educational institution fails to resolve issues within 30 days after being notified, the coordinator may escalate the matter to federal authorities. An annual report of these activities shall be submitted to the General Assembly by July 1 each year.

This act is similar to HB 746 (2025) and provisions in HCS/SS/SB 38 (2025) and HCS/HB 937 (2025).

OLIVIA SHANNON

Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Education

SJR95 - Sen. Adam Schnelting (R) - Establishes the "Show-Me Prosperity Fund"
Summary:

SS/SCS/SJR 95 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by voters, establishes the "Show-Me Prosperity Fund", which is established as a permanent public endowment to provide long-term fiscal stability with the goal of eliminating state-imposed taxes without impairing the real value of the fund's principal. The fund shall consist of money appropriated to it by the General Assembly, and may also receive gifts, donations, grants, and bequests from any source.

 

The State Treasurer shall invest the fund in exchange-traded funds tracking the stock performance of the Standard and Poor's 500 a manner consistent with fiduciary standards applicable to public trust funds. No money shall be appropriated from the fund until the notification is given by the State Treasurer that the net investment earnings of the fund, as defined in the amendment, are sufficient to eliminate state-imposed taxes, at which time net investment earnings from the fund shall be used to eliminate state taxes as provided in the amendment. The total amount of moneys that may be appropriated from the fund in a fiscal year shall not exceed three percent of the average market value of the fund over the preceding five fiscal years.

 

Upon the elimination of all state-imposed taxes, no such taxes shall thereafter be enacted, provided, however, that in the event the fund is unable to meet its obligations due to insolvency, revenue shortfall, or program failure, the General Assembly shall retain full authority to appropriate funds from any lawful source and to enact legislation establishing or increasing taxes or other revenues as necessary to ensure continuity of state programs and fulfillment of state expenditures that were anticipated to be supported by the fund.

 

Upon the elimination of all state-imposed taxes, the General Assembly may appropriate net investment earnings from the fund for the purpose of replacing federal moneys received by the state, for issuing dividend payments to residents of the state, or both.

 

The principal of the fund shall not be appropriated, pledged, or borrowed against. The State Auditor shall conduct an audit of the fund to ensure compliance with the provisions of the amendment at such times that the Auditor deems necessary, but no less than once every three fiscal years.

JOSHUA NORBERG

 

Position: Oppose (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/13/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/23/2026, 3:45 PM - Senate-Fiscal Oversight, Senate Lounge

Position: Amend (NAACP)

HB2099 - Rep. Phil Amato (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the unlawful use of real property
Summary:

HCS HB 2099 -- UNLAWFUL USE OF REAL PROPERTY (Amato)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Commerce

Currently, property owners can file a petition to seek relief for the removal of any unlawful occupants from property containing a residential dwelling. This bill replaces the petition's coverage and applies it to private noncommercial property.

Currently, when a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe that an unlawful occupant on property containing a residential dwelling has violated an ex parte order to remove that person from the property, the officer must arrest the offending party regardless of whether the violation occurred in the presence of the arresting officer. If such an arrest is made in good faith, the arresting and assisting law enforcement officers and employing entities and superiors will be immune from liability for false arrest, false imprisonment, or malicious prosecution.

This bill makes it clear that the relevant property is private noncommercial property rather than property containing a residential dwelling and that it must be the arresting and assisting law enforcement officer's employing entities and superiors who will be immune from liability.

This bill is similar to HB 400 (2025).

Position: Amend (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

HB2120 - Rep. John Black (R) - Establishes antibullying requirements for school districts
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 19 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2120 & 1698.

This bill modifies Section 160.775, RSMo, by establishing "Sawyer's Law".

The bill defines the terms "act of school violence" or "violent behavior", "crime", and "zero-tolerance disciplinary policy".

The bill requires any school bullying policy to include a restriction on zero-tolerance disciplinary policies for any student that is a victim of bullying. A statement regarding any student who engages in self-defense must be considered by the school district or charter school administration when determining any disciplinary action for a student who was responding to an act of school violence or violent behavior committed against the student. The bill requires charter schools to adopt and school districts to update current school bullying policies.

This bill requires that all reported incidents be submitted in writing and that the results of an investigation must include a description of any interventions, initiatives, techniques, or discipline provided to all students involved on a standardized form developed by the district.

The policy is required to outline a procedure for responding to an investigation that finds an act of bullying has occurred. The procedure must include notifying the parents of the bullying student and students committing acts of bullying are included in educational trainings and prevention initiatives.

The bill requires the policy to outline annual mandatory training for any district employee and volunteer that has contact with students; training on appropriate interventions and associated liability for action or inaction must be included in the training. This bill requires the school administration to report monthly to the school board all acts of bullying, discipline for bullying, and all other disciplinary referrals. The school board must review the monthly report in a closed meeting and address concerns related to reported incidents within 30 days.

The bill provides immunity from liability for any school district employee and volunteer who intervenes in an incident of school violence, violent behavior, or criminal actions against any student that is a victim of bullying; the bill specifies that the employee must follow the proper procedure and act in good faith to intervene under the defense of justification provided under Chapter 563.

The bill provides protection from civil liability for any school district or charter school for disciplinary actions if the procedures were properly followed and if a suit is brought the school may recoup attorney's fees if they prevail. This bill requires that for reporting requirements for mandated reporters under Section 210.115, bullying, incidents of school violence, and crime, are considered abuse and required to be reported, with protections provided for reporting compliance. The bill prevents charter schools from expelling or transferring a student out of the school solely due to reports of bullying.

This bill is similar to HB 351 (2025).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that it is important to have parental notification for incidents of bullying and harassment especially for teens with mental health concerns. Specific examples and situations where bullying has often lead to self-harm are warnings that this is serious concern for schools and that action needs to be taken to address the bullying. Sincerely held- beliefs need to be protected as not using a preferred name should not be considered bullying.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Black; and Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Amend (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2637 - Rep. John Black (R) - Modifies provisions relating to criminal offenses, including minimum prison terms and conditional release
Summary:

HCS HBs 2637 & 3155 -- TERMS OF SENTENCING (Black)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Judiciary

The bill repeals a provision that does not consider an offender's first incarceration in a Department of Corrections long-term substance abuse program or 120-day program as a previous prison commitment for the purpose of determining a minimum prison term. The bill repeals provisions related to conditional release.

The bill adds to the definition of "dangerous felony": abuse through forced labor; labor and sex trafficking; sex trafficking of a child; and a third violation of failure to register as a sex offender. The bill removes the requirement that the victim of statutory rape in the first degree or statutory sodomy in the first degree be under 12 years old at the time of the commission of the offense for the offense to be a dangerous felony, and it clarifies that an offender convicted of a dangerous felony must serve 85% of the imposed sentence prior to being eligible for parole. The bill increases the minimum terms of imprisonment for rape in the first degree and statutory rape in the first degree.

The bill amends provisions related to minimum prison terms as follows:

(1) For a class A felony, an offender must serve 70%;

(2) For a class B felony, an offender must serve 50%;

(3) For a class C felony, an offender must serve 40%; and

(4) For a class D or E felony, an offender must serve 25%.

When a person is sentenced to an authorized term of imprisonment for a higher class than the offense for which the person was found guilty, the person will also be sentenced to the parole eligibility percentage of the higher class. The bill provides calculations for when consecutive or concurrent sentences are imposed by the court.

The bill modifies provisions related to credit for time served, including requiring the court to, when pronouncing sentence or executing a suspended sentence or suspending the imposition of a sentence, record the number of days the person spent in prison, jail, or custody due to the offense after the offense occurred and before the pronouncement of the sentence or the suspension of imposition of the sentence. The jail time credit calculation will be pronounced at the time of the judgment, execution of a suspended sentence, or the suspension of imposition of sentence. Upon motion by the defendant, the court can also award jail time credit for any person who was held in a juvenile detention facility for an offense for which the person was subsequently certified to stand trial as an adult.

Currently, a sentencing court can, upon petition, reduce a term of sentence or probation or conditional release if the person is not a prior offender, a persistent offender, or an unclassified offender as defined in the section related to minimum terms of imprisonment. This bill repeals that authorization.

Position: Amend (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 

HB2741 - Rep. Carolyn Caton (R) - Modifies commercial driver's license requirements for foreign applicants
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Transportation by a vote of 9 to 2 with 1 member voting present.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2741.

This bill requires an operator of a commercial motor vehicle to speak English sufficiently to:

(1) Converse with the general public;

(2) Understand highway traffic signs and signals in English;

(3) Respond to official inquiries; and

(4) Make entries on reports and records.

An operator of a commercial motor vehicle who fails to demonstrate the required English language proficiency commits a class D misdemeanor on a first offense and a class B misdemeanor on a second or subsequent offense.

A driver found to be in violation of the English language proficiency requirement is prohibited from operating a commercial motor vehicle in the State until the driver is able to meet the required English language proficiency.

A fine of $1,000 will be imposed on the driver of the motor vehicle, and a fine of $3,000 will be imposed on their commercial motor carrier. The commercial motor carrier will be notified of the location of any commercial motor vehicle involved in a violation of the English language proficiency requirement, and upon payment of the $3,000 fine, a qualified driver will take possession of the vehicle.

The bill provides that if the carrier is unable to pay the fine or present a qualified driver within 12 hours, the owner of any cargo being transported in the commercial motor vehicle may arrange for the transfer of their property to another vehicle, but neither the State nor the owner of the cargo will be liable for any reasonable action to transfer the cargo. This bill requires a person holding a nondomiciled commercial driver's license or a commercial driver's instruction permit within this state to have a valid work visa or provide proof of citizenship to validate his or her identity while operating a commercial motor vehicle.

An operator who fails to possess a valid work visa and provide proof of citizenship while operating a commercial vehicle will be prohibited from operating a commercial vehicle until such operator is able to meet these requirements and if such operator operates a commercial motor vehicle again without meeting these requirements, such operator commits a class B misdemeanor and is subject to a fine of $1,000 or imprisonment for up to 90 days.

A fine $3,000 will be imposed on a commercial motor carrier whose driver fails to possess a valid work visa and proof of citizenship while operating a commercial motor vehicle. The commercial motor carrier will be notified of the location of any commercial motor vehicle involved in the violation of not possessing a valid work visa and proof of citizenship, and upon payment of the $3,000 fine, a qualified driver will take possession of the vehicle.

The bill provides that if the carrier is unable to pay the fine or present a qualified driver within 12 hours, the owner of any cargo being transported in the commercial motor vehicle may arrange for the transfer of their property to another vehicle, but neither the State nor the owner of the cargo will be liable for any reasonable action to transfer the cargo.



The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this is about safety on our public roads. Individuals need to be able to read road signs to respond appropriately when a road is closed or other information needs to be conveyed. Accidents caused by individuals who can't read signage result in property damage, injuries, and even deaths. In emergency situations, a trucker needs to be able to quickly respond and communicate dangerous conditions of their cargo or the scene with law enforcement. The responsibility and the dangers presented by a standard car and a tractor trailer are very different. There's a reciprocity agreement with Canada and Mexico that is supposed to allow commercial driver's to make direct trips to and from one location in the country. However, the process is being misused by drivers who pick up multiple stops before returning, and this places citizens at risk.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Caton; Arnie Dienoff; Lewie Pugh, Owner Operator Independent Drivers Association; and Missouri Trucking Association.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say commercial driver's license statutes are based on Federal requirements. Much of this bill is a restating of the rule from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Even in a self-driving car, an individual must have a license. Individuals in a self-driving commercial motor vehicle would also have to comply with commercial driver's license requirements. Previously, there was more leeway in obtaining a nondomiciled commercial driver's license, but now they are restricted to certain visas, and the Department of Revenue has been downgrading individuals unable to meet Federal standards from their current commercial driver's licenses.

Testifying in person on the bill was Zachary Wyatt, Department of Revenue.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Amend (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

SB928 - Sen. Patty Lewis (D) - Modifies provisions relating to criminal offenses, assault, domestic violence, stalking, and violations of no contact orders
Summary: SCS/SB 928 - This act modifies provisions relating to criminal offenses.

ATTORNEY GENERAL (SECTION 27.117)

This act gives the Attorney General concurrent jurisdiction to prosecute certain offenses that occurred in more than one jurisdiction.

PROTECTIVE ORDERS (SECTION 455.050)

Under current law, a person that petitions for a full or ex parte protective order is protected from certain offenses if the order is granted. This act adds cyberstalking to the list of offenses.

RELEASE FROM JAIL (SECTION 544.667)

Currently, a person can be released from jail upon recognizance or bond. This act provides that a person that has been released under such circumstances that fails to comply with the conditions of such release that imposes no contact with the victim shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor and shall forfeit any security that was pledged for their release.

CRIMINAL OFFENSES (SECTIONS 565.002, 565.050, 565.052, 565.054, 565.056, 565.072, 565.073, 565.074, 565.090, 565.091, 565.225, 565.227, 565.260, 565.400, 565.405, 573.570, & 573.575)

This act modifies the offenses of assault in the first, second, third, and fourth degrees and the offenses of domestic violence in the first, second, third, and fourth degrees by removing the defined terms of "serious physical injury" and "physical injury" and providing for the following harms:

• Great bodily harm: Bodily injury which creates a high probability of death, or which causes serious permanent or protracted loss or impairment of function of any bodily member or organ, or other serious bodily harm;

• Substantial bodily harm: Bodily harm which involves a temporary but substantial disfigurement, or which causes temporary but substantial loss or impairment of the function of any bodily member or organ, or which causes a fracture of any bodily member; and

• Bodily harm: Physical pain or injury, illness, or any impairment of physical condition.

Under current law, the first offense of harassment in the first degree is a class E felony. This act provides that a second or subsequent conviction of harassment in the first degree shall be a class D felony where the individual has previously been found guilty of harassment in the first or second degree. Currently, a first offense of harassment in the second degree is a class A misdemeanor. Under this act, provisions relating to a second or subsequent conviction of harassment in the second degree are modified to include a conviction of harassment in the first degree as a previous conviction in which case it is a class E felony.

This act modifies the offense of stalking in the first degree by repealing the elements of such offense and providing that a person commits the offense of stalking in the first degree when the person knowingly, through a course of conduct that is directed at another person or through technological abuse, as defined in the act, engages in conduct that would cause a reasonable person under similar circumstances to:

• Fear death or bodily injury, as defined in this act;

1. Fear that an offense will be committed against a member of the person's family, household members, or an individual with whom the person has a dating relationship;

2. Fear that an offense will be committed against the person's property; or

3. Feel harassed, terrified, or intimidated.

This act modifies the offense of stalking in the second degree by repealing the elements of such offense and providing that a person commits the offense of stalking in the second degree when the person knowingly, through a course of conduct that is directed at another person or through technological abuse, as defined in the act, engages in conduct that would cause a reasonable person under similar circumstances to feel harassed, terrified, or intimidated.

This act creates the offense of unlawful tracking of a motor vehicle. A person is guilty of this offense if he or she knowingly installs, conceals, or otherwise places an electronic tracking device in or on a motor vehicle. This offense shall be a class A misdemeanor for a first offense and a class E felony for a second or subsequent offense.

This act creates the offense of cyberharassment. A person commits this offense if he or she purposely or knowingly engages in a threatening, aggressive, or otherwise fear-inducing, course of conduct by using digital technology, internet service providers, electronic service providers or other electronic communications and devices cause reasonable fear, alarm, anxiety, undo stress, or terror to others by repeated contact with no legitimate purpose. This offense shall be a class B misdemeanor upon a first offense and a class A misdemeanor for second or subsequent offenses.

A person commits the offense of cyberstalking if such person purposely or knowingly engages in a threatening, aggressive, or otherwise fear-inducing, course of conduct by using digital technology, internet service providers, electronic service providers or other electronic communications and devices to enhance the ability to intimidate, track, follow or cause reasonable fear, alarm, anxiety, undo stress, or terror to another person. A first offense shall be a class A misdemeanor and a second or subsequent offense shall be a class E felony.

This act creates the offense of disclosure of an intimate digital depiction. A person shall be guilty of such offense if he or she discloses or threatens to disclose an intimate digital depiction with the intent to harass or threaten another person.

A violation of such offense is a class D felony if the person discloses an intimate digital depiction and a class E felony if the person threatens to disclose an intimate digital depiction. Any second or subsequent violation of such offense is a class C felony. Additionally, it shall be a class C felony if the disclosure interferes with a government proceeding or causes violence.

This act creates the offense of sadistic online exploitation. A person commits this offense where he or she uses the internet to coerce a victim into committing certain acts. This offense shall be a class E felony.

TRISTAN BENSON, JR.

Position: Amend (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/04/2026 
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence

Position: Neutral (NAACP)

HB1792 - Rep. Jim Murphy (R) - Establishes the Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Act
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Children and Families by a vote of 15 to 0.

This bill establishes the "Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Act". The bill defines "media literacy" to include concepts such as, but not limited to: an individual's ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and participate with all forms of media, including news in print and social media content, and recognize bias and stereotypes in media, as well as Internet safety.

This bill requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to establish a "Media Literacy and Critical Thinking" Pilot Program for the 2027-28 and 2028-29 school years. Between five and seven diverse schools will be selected by DESE to participate in the Pilot Program as specified in the bill.

The Program will address media literacy, develop strategies for student learning in classroom curricula, and demonstrate various literacy strategies used.

Pilot Program schools must provide a report to DESE before August 1, 2029, and before January 1, 2030, DESE must compile and submit a summary report to the General Assembly.

The Pilot Program terminates June 30, 2029. This section expires December 31, 2029.

This bill is similar to HB 1513 (2024) and HB 116 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that something must be done to help the children manage the way that they receive information in the new digital age. Students need to learn that what they see and hear is being shown to them in order to influence them one way or another. This would be a pilot program with the purpose of teaching our children to internalize critical thinking. The ability to verify information is what?s important. This bill is sorely needed.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Murphy; Missouri State Teachers Association; Missouri National Education Association; Arnie Dienoff; and Missouri Press Association.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Neutral (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

HB3292 - Rep. Mike Costlow (R) - Establishes the "Motivational Boot Camp Incarceration Program" in the department of corrections and allows certain persons to be sentenced to the Program
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Corrections and Public Institutions by a vote of 10 to 2, with one member voting "present".

The following is a summary for the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3292 & 2171.

This bill directs the Department of Corrections to establish the "Motivational Boot Camp Incarceration Program".

The Program must include a strong emphasis on work; physical activity; good health practices; intensive counseling; treatment programming; self-discipline and self-motivation; and a detailed explanation of program goals, objectives, rules and criteria.

Enrollment in the Program will last for a period of two years.

The Boot Camp Program will be voluntary and available to any person between the ages of 17 and 21 who has two prior convictions for nonviolent criminal offenses which is not a Class A or B felony. Upon a third conviction for a nonviolent offense which is not a Class A or B felony, the offender can choose participation in the Boot Camp Incarceration Program in lieu of a jail or prison sentence.

Before placement in the Program, participants will be screened for disqualifying criteria, including: physical or mental disability that would inhibit strenuous physical activity, contagious diseases, age qualifications, and Department approval for placement.

The Department will certify an offender's satisfactory completion of the Program to the court. Upon receipt of the certification, the court will release the person from confinement and expunge the offense for which the person was sentenced from their criminal record. If the Department finds that an offender's participation in the Program is unsatisfactory, the court can impose the remainder of the original jail or prison sentence.

This bill is similar to HB 2171 (2026) and HB 817 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that we?ve all been young and made mistakes, but mistakes shouldn?t always keep us from moving on in life. People deserve second chances. This bill is designed to give young people a foundation and stability to move along and become productive citizens. Peer pressure can lead to choices young people will regret. An opportunity to change is all some people need to thrive and realize they don?t always have to be the same person who committed the crime. Many states have these programs. The cost to house and treat young people in these programs is lower than in a normal prison, and care is improved. There?s some debate about recidivism, but the data on newer procedures is quite positive. Originally, it was more punitive and lacked the therapy approach. This program will work to avoid potential resentment, which was a problem in past programs. This is designed to prevent people from committing further, worse crimes.



Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Costlow; and Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: Neutral (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

SB1249 - Sen. David Gregory (R) - Allows the Director of Public Safety to deny certain individuals a peace officer license or entry into basic training courses
Summary: SB 1249 - This act provides that the Director of the Department of Public Safety shall have cause to deny any application for a peace officer license or entry into a basic training course when the applicant previously had a peace officer license revoked or surrendered or when the applicant is not a citizen of the United States.

This act is identical to provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 71 (2025) and HB 981 (2025).

TRISTAN BENSON, JR.

Position: Neutral (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/12/2026 

SB1593 - Sen. Doug Beck (D) - Designates every April 27th as "Ulysses S. Grant Day" in Missouri
Summary: SB 1593 - This act designates every April 27th as "Ulysses S. Grant Day" in Missouri.

This act is identical to HB 2213 (2026).

JIM ERTLE

Position: Neutral (NAACP)
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Progress and Development

Position: No position selected.

HB1625 - Rep. Willard Haley (R) - Modifies the offenses of trafficking of drugs in the first and second degree
Summary: HB 1625 -- OFFENSES INVOLVING THE TRAFFICKING OF DRUGS (Haley)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Crime and Public Safety

Currently, the offense of delivery of a controlled substance causing death contains the element that the person who commits the offense knows that the controlled substance is mixed with another controlled substance. This bill removes that element.

This bill amends the offenses of drug trafficking in the first degree and drug trafficking in the second degree.

Currently, trafficking drugs in the first degree is a class B felony if the person knowingly distributes, delivers, manufactures, or produces, or attempts to distribute, deliver, manufacture, or produce more than 10 milligrams of fentanyl or carfentanil. It is a class A felony if the amount is 20 milligrams or more.

Trafficking drugs in the second degree is a class C felony if the person knowingly possesses or has under his or her control, purchases or attempts to purchase, or brings into this State more than 10 milligrams of fentanyl or carfentanil, and is a class B felony if the amount is 20 milligrams or more.

This bill amends the quantities of fentanyl for the offense of trafficking of drugs, in the first and second degree, as follows:

(1) Drug trafficking in the first degree is a class B felony for more than three but less than 14 milligrams of fentanyl;

(2) Drug trafficking in the first degree is a class A felony for at least 14 milligrams of fentanyl;

(3) Drug trafficking in the second degree is a class C felony for more than three but less than 14 milligrams of fentanyl;

(4) Drug trafficking in the second degree is a class B felony for at least 14 milligrams of fentanyl.

Under the offense of trafficking drugs in the first degree, trafficking any amount of carfentanil up to .05 milligrams is a class B felony, and trafficking more than .05 milligrams is a class A felony. Under the offense of trafficking drugs in the second degree, trafficking any amount of carfentanil up to .05 milligrams is a class C felony, and trafficking more than .05 milligrams is a class B felony.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

HB1627 - Rep. Willard Haley (R) - Modifies provisions governing the Career and Technical Education Advisory Council
Summary: This bill modifies the membership of the "Career and Technical Education Advisory Council" to include the commissioner of higher education or his or her designees. Currently, the Council has an individual from the business community with a background in commerce. This bill modifies that to four individuals from business and commerce.

Additional alterations to the current Council make-up are specified and the length of member terms is reduced from five to three years with no member serving more than two terms. Currently, the Council is required to meet four times annually. This bill reduces that requirement to two times annually and reporting requirements for the Council to the State Board of Education are repealed.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Higher Education and Workforce Development

HB1869 - Rep. Lane Roberts (R) - Establishes a grant program to provide funds to repair and reset grave markers for deceased veterans
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 21 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1869.

This bill creates the "Veterans' Grave Marker Trust Fund" for the purpose of repairing or reseting grave markers for deceased veterans at cemeteries located in this State that have been damaged by natural causes.

The Commission must establish a grant program to provide reimbursement for the repairing or resetting of certain grave markers of deceased veterans. The Commission will award a grant for reimbursement if the deceased veteran:

(1) Has served at least 180 days as an active-duty member of the U.S. military service or died while on official military duty status as an active-duty member;

(2) Was discharged under honorable conditions and was never convicted of a State or Federal criminal offense or any capital criminal offense;

(3) Did not die under circumstances that would bring discredit upon the military services or the State; and

(4) Is buried or interred in a privately owned cemetery or burial plot within this State.

The bill requires the Commission to establish and post on its website the contents of the grant application, and the procedures and timelines by which property owners may apply for grants.

The Veterans' Commission will award grants on a first-come, first-served basis. The amount of the grant to be awarded will be equal the actual cost expended to repair or reset the grave marker but cannot exceed $2,500. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill allows loved ones of deceased veterans to continue to honor those who served this country. This would not be for vandalism, but it would be for damage caused by natural causes.

Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Roberts.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that this would require more funding for the Commission and it would be an additional responsibility being placed on the Commission. The Commission does not currently have enough full-time employees to run this program.

Testifying in person on the bill was Paul Kirchhoff, Missouri Veterans Commission.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2105 - Rep. David Casteel (R) - Allows landlords to apportion charges to tenants for water and sewer utility service
Summary:

HCS HB 2105 -- WATER AND SEWER SERVICE FOR RENTAL PROPERTY (Casteel)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on General Laws

The bill specifies that a landlord or a landlord's water and sewer service billing provider is not a public utility or water or sewer corporation for purposes of regulation by the Public Service Commission, nor will the lessees of the owner or operator of the premises be considered a customer of any public utility, sewer corporation, or water corporation.

A landlord can apportion charges for water and sewer services to tenants by actually measuring individual tenant utility usage with a meter or by allocating charges through use of a mathematical formula. Landlords can use a mathematical formula to apportion water and sewer charges for common areas to each tenant. If using a meter, landlords must disclose certain information about the meter readings on the tenant's bill. If using a mathematical formula, landlords must disclose the formula to a prospective tenant before entering into a lease.

The total amount billed to tenants by a landlord for water and sewer service must not exceed the total amount owed by the landlord to the utility for service to the property, except that landlords can charge tenants for reasonable administrative costs, provided that the administrative costs are disclosed before the signing of a lease. Landlords can also charge late fees, which will be considered part of a tenant's rent. Landlords can use third-party billing providers to bill tenants for water and sewer service, but the providers must comply with requirements in the same manner as landlords.

This bill is similar to HB 1488 (2025).

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

HB2124 - Rep. Brad Banderman (R) - Modifies provisions for initiative petitions and referendums
Summary: This bill requires initiative and referendum petition signature pages to be printed on a form as specified by the Secretary of State. Signature page forms will be made available in electronic format (Sections 116.045 and 116.050, RSMo).

The bill requires petition circulators to be citizens of the United States and either residents of Missouri or physically present in Missouri for at least 30 consecutive days prior to the collection of signatures, and prohibits them from being compensated based on the number of signatures collected. Circulator affidavits are updated to reflect these requirements (Sections 116.030, 116.040, 116.080).

Signatures must be recorded using black or dark ink (Section 116.130).

Currently, any citizen can challenge the official ballot title or fiscal note for a Constitutional amendment, initiative petition, or referendum measure, or the certification of a petition as sufficient or insufficient. This bill changes this to allow only a Missouri registered voter to make these challenges (Sections 116.190 and 116.200).

The bill requires final adjudication relating to a challenge of the official ballot title or fiscal note to occur at least eight weeks before the date of the election (Section 116.190).

Currently, the Secretary of State and Attorney General review initiative and referendum petitions for sufficiency as to form, and approve or reject them on that basis. This bill changes this to require these officials to review initiative and referendum petitions for compliance with Section 116.050 and with Article III of the Missouri Constitution (Section 116.332).

The bill repeals the requirement that the Joint Committee on Legislative Research hold a hearing to take public comment on a proposed measure within 30 days of the Secretary of State issuing certification that the petition contains a sufficient number of valid signatures (Section 116.153).

This bill is similar to HB 575 (2025) and HB 1749 (2024).
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Elections

HB2176 - Rep. Chad Perkins (R) - Modifies provisions relating to public safety
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on General Laws by a vote of 8 to 4.

This bill establishes the "Anti-Red Flag Gun Seizure Act".

For purposes of the bill, "red flag law" is defined as any gun control law, order, or measure that directs the seizure of any firearm, accessory, or ammunition of an individual, except persons lawfully in custody or persons who have been released after the execution of a bail bond after having been charged with a dangerous felony, or any Federal or state rule, statute, or judicial order that prohibits a Missouri citizen from owning or receiving any firearm, accessory, or ammunition or any order of removal for the surrender of any firearm, accessory, or ammunition of an individual, except persons lawfully in custody or persons who have been released after the execution of a bail bond after having been charged with a dangerous felony.

Any red flag law that directs the confiscation of any firearm, accessory, or ammunition from any law-abiding citizen, within the borders of Missouri, will not be enforced within Missouri.

No state agency, political subdivision, or state or local law enforcement agency can receive any Federal funds for the purpose of enforcing any Federal law, order, or judicial finding for the purpose of enforcing any state statute, rule, order, or judicial finding that would have the effect of enforcing a red flag law against a Missouri citizen.

No entity or person, including a state entity or employee thereof, or political subdivision or employee thereof, will have the authority to enforce or attempt to enforce a red flag law regardless of the red flag law's origin or the authority of the issuing entity, except that this prohibition will not apply to any agent of the Federal government enforcing a Federal law or Federal order.

A political subdivision or state or local law enforcement agency that employs a law enforcement officer that knowingly violates the provisions of this bill will be liable to the party against whom the red flag law was enforced and additionally will be subject to a civil penalty of $50,000 per occurrence. In any action brought under the provisions of this bill, a court can order injunctive or other equitable relief, recovery of damages, other legal remedies, and payment of reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and expenses of the party. Such relief will not be exclusive and additional relief or remedies can be awarded as otherwise permitted by law (Section 1.486).

Currently, the Missouri General Assembly occupies and preempts the entire field of legislation on firearms, components, and ammunition and supplies of firearms. An exception is granted allowing local political subdivisions to regulate the open carrying of firearms by ordinance.

This bill repeals this exception for local political subdivisions. This bill also creates a civil cause of action against a political subdivision that enacts an ordinance that regulates firearms. Any person who believes that a jurisdiction has taken action that would violate these provisions will have standing to pursue a cause of action or to seek injunctive relief, and the injured party will receive a civil penalty of $50,000. The court can also award the injured party reasonable attorney fees and costs. Sovereign immunity will not be considered an affirmative defense (Section 21.750).

Currently, a person can use physical force upon another person to defend himself or herself or a third person from what he or she reasonably believes to be the imminent use of unlawful force by such other person. However, a person must not use deadly force upon another person unless such force is used against a person who unlawfully enters a dwelling, residence, or vehicle. If the person asserts that his or her use of deadly force was for this purpose, the burden is on the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant did not reasonably believe that the use of such force was necessary.

This bill repeals those provisions related to deadly force used against another who unlawfully enters a dwelling, residence, or vehicle. This bill further states that there must be a presumption of reasonableness that the defendant believed such force was necessary to defend himself or herself or a third party from what he or she believed to be the use or imminent use of unlawful force by another person (Section 563.031).

Currently, an armed nuclear security guard, employer of an armed nuclear security guard, or owner of a nuclear power plant will not be subject to civil liability for the physical or deadly force used by an armed nuclear security guard. However, even if the use of physical or deadly force was justified, that fact does not abolish or impair any remedy for such conduct in a separate civil action.

This bill repeals the provision allowing for a remedy for such conduct in a separate civil action (Section 563.041).

Currently, a person who uses physical or deadly force under certain conditions, as described in the bill, is justified in using such force and will be an absolute defense to criminal prosecution or civil liability. However, even if the use of physical or deadly force was justified, that fact does not abolish or impair any remedy for such conduct in a separate civil action.

This bill repeals the provision allowing for a remedy for such conduct in a separate civil action (Section 563.074).

This bill provides immunity to a person from criminal prosecution and civil action for the use or threatened use of physical or deadly force, unless:

(1) The person against whom such force was used or threatened is a law enforcement officer acting in his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself as such; and

(2) The force used or threatened occurred in a location readily accessible to the public.

A law enforcement agency can investigate the use or threatened use of force, but the agency must not arrest the person for using or threatening force unless the agency determines that there is probable cause that the force used or threatened was unlawful.

Once a prima facie claim of self-defense immunity is raised by the defendant in a criminal prosecution or civil action, the party seeking to overcome the immunity claim will have to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the claim is improper (Section 563.085).

Currently, a county or city sheriff can issue a concealed carry permit to someone at least 19 years of age, or who is at least 18 years of age and a member of the U.S. Armed Services. This bill repeals these provisions, and reduces the minimum age to 18 (Section 571.101). Currently, a concealed carry endorsement issued prior to August 28, 2013, must be suspended or revoked if the holder of the endorsement becomes ineligible due to certain state actions taken against the holder. This bill extends such a suspension or revocation to a holder who is at least 18 years of age (Section 571.104).

Currently, any individual who has knowledge that a person with a concealed carry permit or endorsement is ineligible to hold such a permit or endorsement can file a petition to revoke that person's permit or endorsement. The individual filing the revocation petition can check any boxes that apply to the defendant. This bill updates the revocation petition form by:

(1) Repealing the requirement that the named defendant must be at least 19 years of age; and

(2) Altering the number of years of imprisonment for crimes that the defendant has pled guilty to or been convicted of (Section 571.117).

Currently, a Missouri lifetime or extended concealed carry permit must be issued by a county or city sheriff if the applicant is at least 19 years of age, or is at least 18 years of age and a member of the U.S. Armed Services. This bill repeals these provisions, and reduces the minimum age to 18 (Section 571.205).

Currently, any individual who has knowledge that a person with a Missouri lifetime or extended concealed carry permit is ineligible to hold such a permit can file a petition to revoke that person's permit. The individual filing the revocation petition can check any boxes that apply to the defendant. This bill updates the revocation petition form by:

(1) Repealing the requirement that the named defendant must be at least 19 years of age; and

(2) Altering the number of years of imprisonment for crimes that the defendant has pled guilty to or been convicted of (Section 571.225).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that to assume someone is guilty without probable cause is un-American. Any time that the government enters the fray, gun rights tend to diminish. Red flag laws are often used nefariously, like stalkers, because the red flag is often raised falsely. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Perkins; Missouri Firearms Coalition; Susan Myers; Arnie C. Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that Missouri has the 4th highest rate of gun violence and very high suicide rates by gun. This will not prevent gun violence. This violates civil and due process laws. Red flag laws are life-saving tools. This is a one-size-fits-all approach that forces jurisdictions to adapt.

Testifying in person against the bill was Kristen Bowen, Moms Demand Action For Gun Sense In America.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2205 - Rep. Don Mayhew (R) - Modifies provisions relating to income tax on retirement income from private and public sources
Summary: This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, 100% of any retirement allowance from any privately funded source and 100% of retirement benefits from sources other than privately funded sources received by each taxpayer must be subtracted from their Missouri adjusted gross income.

This bill is similar to HB 426 (2025).
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Pensions

HB2256 - Rep. Barry Hovis (R) - Modifies provisions relating to minimum prison terms
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Judiciary by a vote of 9 to 4.

Currently, if an offender convicted of one of the offenses specified in statute has one previous prison commitment to the Department of Corrections for a felony offense, the minimum prison term is 40% of the sentence. If an offender has two previous prison commitments to the Department of Corrections for felony offenses, the minimum prison term is 50% of the sentence. If an offender has three or more previous prison commitments to the Department of Corrections, the minimum prison term is 80% of the sentence. If an offender who was convicted of or pled guilty to a felony offense other than one of the specified offenses in statute prior to August 28, 2019, the offender is no longer subject to the minimum prison term in these provisions and is eligible for parole, conditional release, or other early release, as specified.

This bill repeals these provisions, requiring any offender with one or two prior felony convictions to serve 50% of the sentence imposed by the court and any offender with three or more prior felony convictions to serve 80% of the sentence.

The provisions of this bill will go into effect on July 1, 2027.

This bill is similar to HB 862 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that one of the issues law enforcement runs into is arresting someone and sending the person to a prosecutor and not having a good idea of what sentence a person will receive. Sometimes the person gets a probation for the offense but the problem is these people get convicted over and over but never serve a term; they don?t have to serve any mandatory minimum. A person could get convicted multiple times and never serve a day and, when the offender finally gets sentenced, there is no minimum prison term because the offender has no prior commitments to the Department of Corrections. If someone is a prior offender and does not want to keep promises to the court and he or she keeps making poor choices, he or she will have to serve at a minimum 50% for C, D, and E felonies. They do not want to take away from victims and they want to ensure that people who are repeat offenders are held responsible. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hovis; Missouri Fraternal Order of Police; and Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the costs for this bill are estimated to be over $800 million to build a new prison and the fiscal note predicts that this could require as many as five new prisons. People who commit violent crimes in Missouri are already serving lengthy prison sentences and there is no evidence that nonviolent offenders serving longer sentences reduces crime. This delays rehabilitation. Longer mandatory minimums don?t stop people from going back to their communities; they just delay it and then send people home with fewer contacts and options and less support.

Testifying in person against the bill were FWD.US, Inc.; Cliffton Davis, Missouri Justice; Khanika Harper, Justice For All; American Civil Liberties Union - Missouri; and Gwen Smith, Empower Missouri.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Judiciary

HB2335 - Rep. Ann Kelley (R) - Modifies provisions governing school employee training requirements
Summary:

HCS HB 2335 -- SCHOOL EMPLOYEE TRAINING (Kelley)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education

Beginning with the 2026-27 school year, this bill modifies the current required training that school employees must receive annually.

The bill requires that newly hired employees receive instruction on a variety of topics annually for the first three years of employment, these topics include: school discipline, seclusion and restraint, bleeding control kits, school bullying, employee- student communications, epilepsy and seizure disorders, mandatory reporting, dyslexia and related disorders, youth suicide awareness and prevention, and active shooter and intruder response training.

All other employees will be provided training and education on these topics as determined by the school district based on the specific needs of the district and each employee instead of annually.

All employees are required to be trained for a minimum of three years for any newly developed trainings required by state law beginning in the 2026-27 school year. Additionally, employees must receive Federal trainings and trainings for specific job requirements as specified.

This bill is similar to HCS HB 332 (2025).

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

HB2366 - Rep. Jeff Vernetti (R) - Modifies provisions relating to employment of unauthorized aliens
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Commerce by a vote of 9 to 0.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2366 & 2511.

Current law provides that a general contractor or subcontractor of any tier will not be liable when the general contractor or subcontractor contracts with its direct subcontractor who employs an unauthorized alien in violation of law. This bill provides that the general contractor or subcontractor will be liable in such circumstance if the general contractor or subcontractor has knowledge, as defined under 8 37 CFR 274a.1, of such violation. Upon notification from the attorney general (AG) of the alleged or suspected violation of the Sections outlined in this bill, the general contractor or subcontractor must fully cooperate with any investigation conducted by the AG related to the alleged violation.

The bill modifies the provisions allowing the AG to enforce the law governing the employment of unauthorized aliens. The AG is given authority to investigate alleged or suspected violations of the law pertaining to the proper classification of employees for purposes of public works projects. Furthermore, the AG is given powers provided by the Merchandising Practices Act for the purpose of investigating any alleged or suspected violation of the law governing the employment of unauthorized aliens.

In any action brought by the AG to enforce the provisions of law governing the employment of unauthorized aliens, the State will have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the employer knowingly employed, hired for employment, or continued to employ an unauthorized alien to perform work within this State. An employer that participates in a Federal work authorization program will have an affirmative defense that such employer has not violated the Sections outlined in the bill.

The AG can seek an injunction prohibiting the employer from employing an unauthorized alien and seek monetary damages in the amount equal to ten times the amount of wages paid by the employer to any unauthorized alien workers during the time in which such unlawful employment is alleged to have occurred. The AG can also seek an injunction to suspend and the court will have the power to suspend any applicable license, permit, or exemption issued under State law in connection with this matter. The AG can bring an action for injunctive and monetary relief in the circuit court of any county where the alleged violation is occurring or about to occur, or in the Cole County Circuit Court.

If a court determines that an employer has knowingly hired an unauthorized alien, the court must enter a judgment in favor of the State and award penalties in an amount consistent with the prayer for relief in the petition. The AG can enter a consent judgment with any person alleged to have committed a violation prohibited by this bill.

The bill provides that any employer that reports an alleged violation of the sections outlined in this bill to the AG will not be subject to any liability.

This bill is similar to SB 1288 and SB 1288 (2026).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill fixes the roadblocks and issues with current statute. The bill will affect cash-pay employees that are not verified by the general contractor or subcontractor to have legal working status. This bill provides the AG more power to enforce these statutes.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Vernetti; Arnie Dienoff; Mid-America Carpenters Regional Council; and Missouri AFL-CIO.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that they understand the intent of the bill but placing liability on the general contractor for what the subcontractors do is not right. Some say that this bill may impact businesses and employees that are following the law and doing everything the right way.

Testifying in person against the bill were American Civil Liberties Union - Missouri; The Builders? Association - KC Chapter, AGC; Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry; St. Louis Homebuilders Association; and Edward J. Twehous, Associated General Contractors of Missouri & Twehous Excavating Company Inc. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2387 - Rep. Brad Banderman (R) - Modifies provisions for elections
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elections by a vote of 10 to 2 with 1 member voting present.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2387 & 2480.

This bill reinstates the presidential preference primary election, to be held on the first Tuesday in March of each presidential election year.

A person who files to be included on the presidential primary ballot is not prohibited from filing as a party candidate for nomination to another office.

Specific deadlines for administrative actions by local election authorities and the Secretary of State that are necessary to hold the presidential preference primary are specified in the bill.

Candidates will be required to pay a filing fee to the state committee of the established political party on whose ballot they wish to appear. The amount of the fee will be determined by the state committee of each political party.

The conduct of the presidential preference primary and the count and canvass of the votes cast must conform as nearly as possible to that prescribed for the primary election for state officers.

All costs of the presidential preference primary, except for proportional costs for any political subdivision or special district holding an election on the same day, will be paid by the State.

The results of the presidential preference primary will be binding for the purpose of allocating and directing the votes of party delegates and alternate delegates. The political parties must allocate delegates in proportion to the certified statewide and congressional district results of the election, unless a national party rule requires an alternative allocation method, in which case the allocation must conform as nearly as possible to the election results. Delegates will file a written pledge with the Secretary of State affirming that they will vote for the candidate to whom they are bound under for at least the first ballot. A delegate who fails to give or violates the pledge will be deemed to have resigned immediately. An alternate delegate pledged to the same candidate will fill the vacancy.

The Secretary of State must certify the results of the presidential preference primary and is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this bill.

This bill is similar to HB 367 (2025).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the ability to participate in a presidential primary is a bipartisan concern among voters. Voter participation is a vital aspect of the health of the government. More people being involved is better for democracy and better for the candidates. The caucus system excludes from the process of candidate selection a lot of important groups who have busy schedules or trouble getting around. Caucus participation was less than 10% of the voter turnout of the last presidential primary. Moving the date of the primary will give Missouri more influence in the selection process and is a great way to get the attention of national candidates. Expanding the no-excuse in- person absentee voting will lead to safer and more secure elections.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Banderman; Missouri Farm Bureau; American Civil Liberties Union - Missouri; Mike Haffner, Missouri Republican Party; Russ Carnahan, Mo Democratic Party; Arnie Dienoff; Denise Lieberman, Missouri Voter Protection Coalition; and Miles Ross, Missouri Republican Party.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill expressed concerns about modifications to the absentee voting period. There were concerns that lengthening the no-excuse in-person absentee voting period would make elections less secure, and logistical concerns about shortening the overall absentee voting period. Concerns were also expressed about the cost of a statewide election, the results of which are not binding. $9,000,000 is an exorbitant cost for a state run public opinion poll. Presidential candidates are selected by party run caucuses. To hold an election on this subject, the results of which do not determine the selection of the candidates, is dishonest to voters who don't understand the process.

Testifying in person against the bill was Michael Compton, Act for Missouri; Missouri Association of County Clerks and Election Authorities.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/05/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2415 - Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R) - Establishes a definition of "assessment value" for real property assessment purposes
Summary: This bill provides a definition for "assessment value" as it relates to real property assessment purposes.

The bill provides that when "assessed valuation", "assessed value", "free market value", "market value", "property values", "true value in money", and "value" are used as they relate to real property assessment purposes, they must be construed to refer to: "assessment value" as defined in the bill.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

HB2468 - Rep. Brandon Phelps (R) - Modifies provisions for eligibility for public assistance benefits
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on General Laws by a vote of 10 to 3.

This bill prohibits individuals that are not United States citizens or nationals from receiving assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or through MO HealthNet, unless those individuals meet Federal definitions of eligible alien and qualified alien.

The bill modifies what proof must be submitted at the time of application to include proof that the applicant is a United States citizen, United States national, or alien with an immigration status eligible for public benefits. The bill repeals an existing provision of law that prohibits employees of agencies of state or local government from inquiring about the legal status of a custodial parent or guardian applying for a public benefit on behalf of his or her dependent child who is a citizen or permanent resident.

Current law provides that applicants who cannot provide proof required under current law can sign an affidavit under oath attesting to citizenship or classification as a lawfully admitted alien. This bill adds that the affidavit must attest to such applicant's eligibility for public benefits. Currently, an applicant who has provided the sworn affidavit described is eligible to receive temporary benefits for 90 days under certain conditions. This bill modifies that time frame to be the minimum period required under Federal law, or 90 days if no minimum period is required under Federal law.

The bill provides that failure to submit acceptable documentation establishing United States citizenship, national status, or alien status eligible for public benefits will result in denial or termination of public benefits, and that no additional period of eligibility for temporary benefits will be granted to any applicant that has previously been denied public benefits at any time due to a failure to verify citizenship, national status, or alien status eligible for benefits.

Currently, after an applicant's lawful presence has been verified through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements Program through the United States Department of Homeland Security, no additional verification is required. This bill repeals that provision and provides that the system utilized for verification must include, but not be limited to, the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements Program.

This bill requires the MO HealthNet division to include a field for citizenship or immigration status on all presumptive eligibility applications, and that no such application will be approved unless the applicant certifies his or her status as a United States citizen, national, or alien with eligible status for public benefits. Additionally, the bill requires the MO HealthNet division to require hospitals, clinics, and other qualified entities that are authorized to conduct presumptive eligibility determinations to collect and transmit attestations of citizenship or eligible immigration status to the MO HealthNet division.

The bill provides that if any agency administering public benefits is unable to determine an applicant's or enrollee's lawful presence after authorized verification, the agency is required to suspend approval or continuation of benefits and refer the case to the Department of Homeland Security or other appropriate Federal agency.

The bill requires the Department of Social Services, when administering SNAP benefits, to consider the entire income and financial resources of any individual rendered ineligible to receive benefits under the provisions of this bill when determining the eligibility and benefit allotment of the household of which the individual is a member, and not to prorate or exclude the income or financial resources of ineligible individuals.



PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill mandates the use of Federal verification programs for SNAP, with exceptions that mirror Federal law. It will modernize benefit eligibility. It redetermines if a SNAP beneficiary continuously qualifies for benefits, not citizenship. It prevents taxpayer dollars from benefiting illegal immigrants. The "Big Beautiful Bill" would require Missouri to pay for all fraud over 10%, so fraud needs to be addressed.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Phelps; Arnie Dienoff; and FGA Action.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that HR 1 has already passed and it already restricts who qualifies for SNAP. There are concerns about having Missouri being more restrictive toward those who are here lawfully. There is already meticulous documentation required for SNAP. This does not close loopholes, it only creates more barriers and will cost Missouri taxpayers millions.

Testifying in person against the bill were Christina Woody, Empower Missouri; and International Institute of St. Louis.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that SNAP only requires self-attestation of citizenship while applying through the Department of Social Services. No documentation is required unless the applicant attests to not be a citizen.

Testifying in person on the bill were Amanda Adams, Department of Social Services, Family Support Division; Jennifer Loveall, Department of Social Services; and Missouri Petroleum & Convenience Association.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-General Laws

HB2481 - Rep. Jamie Gragg (R) - Prohibits the use of SNAP benefits to purchase certain foods
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on General Laws by a vote of 9 to 3.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2481.

This bill prohibits individuals that are not United States citizens or nationals from receiving assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) or through MO HealthNet, unless those individuals meet Federal definitions of "eligible alien" and "qualified alien".

The bill modifies what proof must be submitted at the time of application to include proof that the applicant is a United States citizen, United States national, or alien with an immigration status eligible for public benefits. The bill repeals an existing provision of law that prohibits employees of agencies of state or local government from inquiring about the legal status of a custodial parent or guardian applying for a public benefit on behalf of his or her dependent child who is a citizen or permanent resident.

Current law provides that applicants who cannot provide proof required under current law can sign an affidavit under oath attesting to citizenship or classification as a lawfully admitted alien. This bill adds that the affidavit must attest to such applicant's eligibility for public benefits. Currently, an applicant who has provided the sworn affidavit described is eligible to receive temporary benefits for 90 days under certain conditions. This bill modifies that time frame to be the minimum period required under Federal law, or 90 days if no minimum period is required under Federal law.

The bill provides that failure to submit acceptable documentation establishing United States citizenship, national status, or alien status eligible for public benefits will result in denial or termination of public benefits, and that no additional period of eligibility for temporary benefits will be granted to any applicant that has previously been denied public benefits at any time due to a failure to verify citizenship, national status, or alien status eligible for benefits. Currently, after an applicant's lawful presence has been verified through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements Program through the United States Department of Homeland Security, no additional verification is required. This bill repeals that provision and provides that the system utilized for verification will include, but not be limited to, the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements Program.

The bill provides that if any agency administering public benefits is unable to determine an applicant's or enrollee's lawful presence after authorized verification, the agency is required to suspend approval or continuation of benefits and refer the case to the Department of Homeland Security or other appropriate Federal agency.

The bill requires the Department of Social Services, when administering SNAP benefits, to consider the entire income and financial resources of any individual rendered ineligible to receive benefits under the provisions of this bill when determining the eligibility and benefit allotment of the household of which the individual is a member, and not to prorate or exclude the income or financial resources of ineligible individuals. All such income and resources will be fully considered.

This bill requires the Director of the Department of Social Services to request a waiver from the United States Department of Agriculture to authorize the State to operate SNAP in a manner that prioritizes healthy foods and nutritional value, and supports Missouri agriculture. The Director is required to explore and recommend strategies to incentivize the purchase of fresh fruits, vegetables, and Missouri-produced meat and dairy products within SNAP through existing Missouri healthy food education and access programs.

This bill is similar to HB 1222 (2025).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this is the SNAP benefit bill from last year with some tightened definitions. This is one of the Governor's priorities and this bill codifies the language from one of his Executive Orders. Each state is adopting similar legislation. The language used and the prioritized foods go back to the original definition of "SNAP". Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Gragg; Arnie Dienoff; and FGA Action.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this legislation may be moot because the Department of Social Services is already working on updated definitions; those definitions need to have flexibility. This area is quite muddy already and putting this into legislation may remove any flexibility.

Testifying in person against the bill were Missouri Beverage Association; Christine Woody, Empower Missouri; and International Institute of St. Louis.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the Department SNAP definitions, as they currently exist, are very broad. They would prefer that definitions are easy to follow and implement.

Testifying in person on the bill were Amanda Adams, Department of Social Services, Family Support Division; Jennifer Loveall, Department of Social Services; Missouri Petroleum & Convenience Association.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2708 - Rep. Barry Hovis (R) - Modifies the offense of possession of unlawful items in a prison or jail
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Corrections and Public Institutions by a vote of 7 to 5.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2708.

Currently, it is illegal to knowingly deliver, attempt to deliver, possess, deposit, or conceal certain items in or about the premises of any correctional center or jail.

This bill adds to the list of prohibited items unauthorized portable electronic communication devices that are capable of being used to initiate, receive, store, or view communication, information, images, or data. The electronic communication devices include, but are not limited to, cellular telephones, portable telephones, text messaging devices, personal digital assistants, pagers, broadband personal communication devices, and electronic devices with mobile data access. A violation involving an unauthorized portable electronic communication device will be a class D felony.

This bill is similar to HB 2414 (2026).

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that electronic devices in prison allow coordination with gangs outside the prison. Individuals are also able to intimidate witnesses and facilitate crime. The current punishment is not a high enough deterrent to stop the activity, and bribes, drones, fence tosses, and other methods allow delivery of contraband.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hovis; Taylor Hagenhoff, Department of Corrections; and Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/05/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Corrections and Public Institutions

HB2762 - Rep. Brad Banderman (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to utilities
Summary: Beginning August 28, 2026, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, or tangible personal property associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $2500 per megawatt of nameplate capacity. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property.

As specified in this bill, if any public utility company has ownership of any real or personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy directly to generate electricity, such solar or wind energy project property will be valued and taxed by any local authorities having jurisdiction.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for any public utility company that has a solar energy project, such solar energy project must be assessed with any solar energy property of such company assessed upon the county assessor's local tax rolls, and all other real property, excluding land, or personal property related to the solar energy project assessed using the methodology as specified in the bill.

Currently, a decree of dissolution to dissolve a public water supply must be passed by a majority of two-thirds of the voters of the district voting on the proposition. This bill reduces the percentage of voters needed to pass the dissolution decree to a majority of four-sevenths of the voters.

For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks, specified in the bill, from adjacent property.

A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project.

Finally, this bill prohibits a new "Wind Energy Conversion System", as defined in the bill, from beginning commercial operations after August 28, 2026, unless that developer, owner, or operator applies to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for installation of a light-mitigating technology system. If the installation is approved by the FAA, the developer, owner, or operator of such wind energy conversion system must install the light-mitigating technology system on approved turbines within 24 months of approval.

Before August 28, 2031, any developer, owner, or operator of a commercial wind energy conversion system without a light- mitigating technology system must apply to the FAA for installation and operation of a system. If the installation is approved by the FAA, the developer, owner, or operator must install the system on approved turbines within 24 months of approval.

Any vendor selected for installation of a light-mitigating technology system must provide to the Department of Natural Resources notice of the progress of the installation of the system. If the installation is delayed beyond the 24-month requirement, the vendor must provide notice to the Department at least every three months, with an update on the reasons for the delay and current status of installation. Any costs associated with the installation, implementation, operation, and maintenance of the system must be the responsibility of the developer, owner, or operator of the wind energy conversion system.

Any developer, owner, or operator approved to install a light- mitigating system, but does not, is liable for a fine of $5,000 per day, per turbine, until the system is installed.

The bill also prohibits the use of eminent domain by electrical corporations for the construction or erection of any plant, tower, panel, or facility that:

(1) Uses, captures, or converts wind or air currents to generate or manufacture electricity; or

(2) Uses, captures, or converts the light or heat generated by the sun to generate or manufacture electricity.

The bill specifies that the authority of any corporation to condemn property must extend to the acquisition of rights needed to construct, operate, and maintain the collection, distribution, communication, and transmission lines, substations, switchyards and other facilities needed to collect and deliver energy generated or manufactured by solar or wind facilities.

This bill is similar to HCS#2 HBs 440 & 1160(2025).
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 3/9/26 - 1:00 pm - HR 7 - House-Utilities

HB3037 - Rep. Bill Allen (R) - Modifies provisions of the "Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program" tax credit
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 8 to 4.

Currently, a taxpayer who makes a qualifying contribution to an educational assistance organization can carry the tax credit forward to any of the taxpayer's four subsequent tax years.

For qualifying contributions made on and after January 1, 2028, this bill allows the taxpayer to also carry the tax credit back to the taxpayer's immediately prior tax year.

This bill is similar to HB 2158 (2026) and HB 568 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill takes into account the fact that a taxpayer's tax liability can vary from year to year, which in turn will allow taxpayers to get the full benefit of their contributions. Supporters further state that many taxpayers decide not to contribute to an organization or cause, even though they qualify under the law, because of the current uncertainty about whether or not the taxpayer would end up owing more in taxes if they did.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Allen; Hillel Anton, Agudath Israel of Missouri; and Jean Evans, American Federation For Children.

OPPONENTS: There was not opposition voiced to the committee.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB3077 - Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R) - Requires school districts to develop instructional materials regarding the responsible use of social media
Summary: This bill requires school districts to develop a curriculum for grades 6-12 with at least one unit of responsible social media use and beginning in the 2027-28 school year, to teach such curriculum annually.

The bill outlines information the curriculum must provide including, but not limited to, the social, emotional, and physical effect of social media, the mental health effect on teens, the influence on thoughts and behaviors and the risk of sharing material online.

Districts can also include benefits of social media in the curriculum and use curriculum developed by a third-party that is recognized by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

The bill also requires districts to provide resources to staff and families regarding technology use, as provided in the bill.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/10/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Children and Families

HB3144 - Rep. Jim Schulte (R) - Modifies provisions relating to injunctions
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Judiciary by a vote of 8 to 4.

This bill authorizes the Attorney General to appeal a preliminary injunction in any action in which the state is preliminarily enjoined from implementing, enforcing, or effectuating any provision of the Missouri Constitution, any statute, or any regulation.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this allows the Attorney General to appeal a preliminary injunction for any case to which the State is a party. The Attorney General attempted to appeal a case, according to one example provided, but they found out they could not because it was not in Cole County. This would allow the Attorney General to appeal no matter where in the State a case is filed. If a state statute were appealed in Federal court, the right to interlocutory appeals would exist. The litigation for Amendment 3 is pending and it?s past the preliminary injunction stage, so this is meant to apply to future litigation. The State has an interest in protecting the welfare of its citizens.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Schulte; Campaign Life Missouri; Peter Donohue, Missouri Attorney General's Office; and Arnie Dienoff.

OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/09/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Judiciary

HB3146 - Rep. John Simmons (R) - Modifies provisions for ballot summary statements
Summary:

HB 3146 -- BALLOT SUMMARY STATEMENTS (Simmons)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elections

This bill increases the word limit on summary statements for ballot measures proposed by the General Assembly from 50 to 100 words, excluding articles.

The bill requires, for all measures except initiative petitions, challenges to official ballot titles or fiscal notes to be brought in the Cole County Circuit Court not later than the 22nd Tuesday prior to the general election at which the measure will be submitted to voters.

If, after a challenge, a summary statement is found to be sufficient and fair, the court must order the statement to be placed on the ballot. If the statement is found to be insufficient or unfair, the circuit court can make suggested revisions but will order the Secretary of State (SOS) to prepare a new summary statement that is sufficient and fair. The SOS can be ordered to write up to three revised summary statements and the court will determine whether they are sufficient and fair. If any of the revised statements are determined to be sufficient and fair, that summary statement will appear on the ballot, subject to any appeals. If, after submission of a third revised summary statement, the court still finds it to be insufficient and unfair, or if the SOS neglects or refuses to submit any of the revised summary statements within the times mandated when ordered, the court will write its own summary statement that is sufficient and fair and order it to appear on the ballot, subject to any appeals. Throughout this process, the SOS will have a shorter time to rewrite language in an election year than in a non-election year.

Unless an action challenging a summary statement isn't fully adjudicated within a certain number of days before the election, an appellate court that concludes that the summary statement was insufficient or unfair shall remand the summary statement to the circuit court for further proceedings. The appellate court can offer suggestions for new language, but it cannot itself modify the statement.

If the action isn't fully adjudicated within a certain number of days before the election, an appeal to the supreme court can be permitted. If, upon appeal, the supreme court concludes that the summary statement was insufficient or unfair, it can offer suggestions for new language, but it cannot itself modify the statement. The Supreme Court will also have to remand the judgment to the circuit court for further proceedings.

Current law requires all actions challenging ballot titles for statewide ballot measures to be fully and finally adjudicated no less than 56 days prior to the date of the election at which they will appear on the ballot. This bill extends that period to 70 days prior to the date of the election.

The bill specifies that once the SOS certifies the official ballot title, signatures can be collected, even if the ballot title is subject to an action in court challenging its sufficiency and fairness. Signatures gathered prior to a court order changing the ballot title will not be invalidated based on the fact that the title was modified.

This bill is similar to SB 22 (2025).

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Reported to the Senate and read first time

HB3220 - Rep. Mike Jones (R) - Modifies provisions relating to driving offenses committed by young drivers
Summary: Currently, for an applicant to receive his or her temporary instruction permit, a parent must give written permission stating that the parent or a designee will provide the applicant with 40 hours of behind-the-wheel driving instruction, including a minimum of 10 nighttime hours.

The bill requires the parent to state that he or she will provide and document the 40 hours of instruction.

This bill prevents intermediate drivers, any person under 21 years of age, and any person who was granted adult driver's license privileges and has held the adult license for fewer than 36 consecutive months without a violation for which points are assessed from getting a traffic violation reduced to a different violation that puts fewer points or no points on the driver's license.

Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill requires all driver's license applicants under 21 years of age who have never held a driver's license to complete an approved driver's education program.

The bill establishes the Driver's Education Training Fund. The State Treasurer will be the custodian of the Fund. The Fund will be used only by the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission to fund driver's education programs.

Currently, license applicants are asked whether they would like to make a donation to promote an organ donor program, blindness education, screening and treatment program, or the medal of honor recipients fund. This bill adds the Driver's Education Training Fund to this list. The donation is voluntary.

The bill raises the price of an intermediate license from $5.00 to $10.00.

Drivers holding an intermediate driver's license who receive more than two non-alcohol-related violations or violations totaling six points or more will have their license converted to a temporary learner's permit and must complete a driver's education program to reinstate their license with a partial reduction of points. If a violation by an intermediate driver involves alcohol or is worth at least 12 points, their license will be revoked or suspended.

Currently, a violation relating to intermediate licenses is punished as an infraction and does not result in points being assessed to an individual's driving record. The bill repeals these provisions.

Starting January 1, 2027, applicants for a driver's license who are under 21 and have never held a license must complete a driver's education program that is approved by the Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission within the 90 days before the application. The Department of Transportation will establish agreements with public or private institutions to provide the driver's education programs free of charge to these applicants. The bill establishes procedures for certification of driver's education programs and specifies requirements that must be met. The Department of Transportation can make rules to implement the programs. An approved driver education class in a school can fulfill the driver education program requirement.

This bill also alters point values assessed and descriptions of violations in Section 302.302, RSMo. Twelve points will be assessed automatically when serious injury or death results from any listed violation. Leaving he scened of an accident in violation of any county or municipal ordinance increases from six to 12 points.

Currently, when a violation for speeding, careless and imprudent driving, leaving the scene of an accident, or driving under the influence constitutes a violation under both state law and either county or municipal ordinance, points can be assessed for either violation but not both

The bill requires points be assessed for the highest violation.

Currently, points can be reduced or stayed from applying to a driver's license via completion of a driver-improvement program.

The bill limits this system to a partial reduction of points and requires online courses to be proctored.

Currently, a court may use a centralized violation bureau and, if it does, it may elect to have the bureau order and verify completion of driver safety courses ordered by the court. This bill requires the court to elect to make this delegation to the centralized violation bureau.

This bill is similar to HB 1339 (2025).
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Crime and Public Safety

HJR154 - Rep. Darin Chappell (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to MO HealthNet work requirements
Summary:

HCS HJR 154 -- MO HEALTHNET (Chappell)

COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Legislative Review

If approved by voters, this constitutional amendment would require the Department of Social Services, MO HealthNet Division to implement work requirements for applicable individuals, as defined in the bill.

Applicable individuals must demonstrate compliance with the work requirements for the month preceding the month during which the individual applies, and no applicable individual will remain enrolled in MO HealthNet unless compliance has been demonstrated. The bill specifies that those seeking an exemption from the work requirements must provide documentation for the exemption sought.

The Department is prohibited from seeking or implementing any additional optional exemptions provided for by federal law, unless a general statute law expressly authorizes the implementation of the exemption. Additionally, the Department is prohibited from accepting exemption designations, approvals, or determinations by a managed care organization.

Currently, the Department is required to take all actions necessary to maximize federal financial participation in funding medical assistance. This bill repeals that requirement.

Currently, no greater or additional burdens or restrictions on eligibility or enrollment standard, methodologies, or practices can be imposed on persons eligible for MO HealthNet services than on any other population eligible for medical assistance. This bill repeals that restriction.

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Families, Seniors and Health

HJR174 - Rep. Jonathan Patterson (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Summary: This constitutional amendment provides that, if all revenue triggers established by law to reduce and eliminate the current individual income tax are met and the top individual income tax rate is reduced below 1.4%, no state individual income tax will be imposed beginning January 1, 2031.

The amendment authorizes state and local sales and use taxes to be expanded by legislation to impose taxes on transactions involving any goods or services for the purpose of reducing and eliminating the state resident individual income tax.

Beginning July 1, 2029, this amendment requires any political subdivision that imposes a sales or use tax to adjust one or more of the following to reduce the amount of revenue generated to a level described in the bill:

(1) Sales or use tax rate;

(2) Any personal property tax levy;

(3) Residential real property tax levy; or

(4) Any earnings tax.

Beginning July 1, 2029, the amendment requires each sales and use tax rate imposed by the Missouri Constitution to be adjusted as specified in the bill. By July 1, 2028, the state auditor must determine such reduced rates that will go into effect January 1, 2029.

This amendment exempts any tax or revenue increase from legislation enacted to reduce and eliminate the state individual income tax within a set time from the requirements of certain limitations provided in the Missouri Constitution.

The resolution provides ballot language for this proposed constitutional amendment.
Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/04/2026 
H - Superseded by HJR 173

SB879 - Sen. Travis Fitzwater (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Summary: SB 879 - The act creates and modifies provisions relating to electric utilities.

PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SOLAR FARMS (Section 67.5350)

Under the act, prior to obtaining a certificate of public convenience or necessity from the Public Service Commission, any person constructing a solar farm shall first submit an application to the county commission in each county where the solar farm is to be located.

The county commission of any county shall adopt an order or an ordinance requiring a permit to construct a solar farm within specified boundaries in an unincorporated area within the county. The permit shall be constructed within specific distances from certain properties described in the act. The permit shall require noise levels not to exceed 45 decibels from any property line.

Within 90 days of receiving an application for a permit, the county commission shall hold a public meeting before the issuance of a permit. Notice shall be provided at least 14 days prior to the public meeting. The applicant shall provide certain information at the public meeting as described in the act.

No later than 90 days after the public meeting, the county commission shall do the following:

- Issue a permit;

- Issue a permit limiting the boundaries of the proposed solar farm; or

- Deny the permit.

Any applicant intending to make a material amendment to the permit once it is issued shall submit a new application for the permit to the county commission. The county commission shall require any applicant who is issued a permit to obtain liability insurance in an amount sufficient to cover any damages which may arise from the construction of the solar farm.

The Public Service Commission shall not issue a certificate of public convenience or necessity to any applicant who did not receive a permit from a county commission in each county where the solar farm is to be located.

The county commission of any county where a solar farm is proposed to be constructed shall require a decommissioning plan of the solar farm, as described in the act.

This provision has an emergency clause.

These provisions are similar to provisions in SB 213 (2025) and SB 892 (2024).

TAXATION OF SOLAR ENERGY PROJECTS (Section 137.100, 137.124, 153.030, & 153.034)

Current law exempts solar energy systems not held for resale from property taxes. This act repeals such provision and provides that solar energy systems constructed for exclusive use of a single property may be exempted from property tax at the discretion of the county assessor.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, or tangible personal property associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity and that was built or constructed to sell power, the tax liability actually owed shall be equal to $6,000 per megawatt of nameplate capacity and shall be adjusted for inflation annually.

Nothing in this provision shall be construed to prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or similar tax abatement agreements or to affect any existing enhanced enterprise zone agreements.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing land that is associated with a solar energy project, the land shall be assessed as commercial property.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for any public utility that has a solar energy project, such solar energy project shall be assessed using certain methodology for real and personal property as described in the act.

The real and tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar energy shall include certain solar equipment as described in the act.

These provisions are identical to SB 892 (2024), HB 2651 (2024), SB 549 (2023), SB 1014 (2022) and HB 1997 (2022), and similar to provisions in SB 213 (2025), a provision in HCS#2/HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).

COMMISSION'S RULEMAKING AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINES ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (Section 393.172)

By March 31, 2027, the Public Service Commission shall promulgate rules applicable to electrical corporations requiring construction of electric transmission lines for which permission is sought from the Commission to adhere to specific standards relating to construction activities occurring on privately owned agricultural land. Such standards are described in the act.

This provision is identical to a provision in SB 213 (2025), SB 892 (2024), and similar to a provision in HB 221 (2025), a provision in SB 139 (2025), a provision in SB 805 (2024).

SOLAR PROJECTS NOT TO EXCEED MORE THAN 2% OF ALL CROPLAND (Section 393.1120)

The total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in any county shall not be more than 2% of all cropland in the county.

The county commission or other authorized governing body may increase the percentage of cropland by order, ordinance, regulation, or vote of the residents of the county.

Any resident of the county shall have standing to bring suit to enforce these provisions against a solar energy project developer.

For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, such project shall be subject to setback distances, as described in the act. This provision shall not apply to solar projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2026.

A solar energy company shall secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection for the solar energy project to connect to the electrical grid prior to beginning construction of the solar energy project.

This provision is similar to a provision in HB 440 (2025).

CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY (Section 523.010)

Under the act, the authority of any electrical corporation to condemn property shall not extend to the construction of any structure or facility that uses wind or solar energy to generate or manufacture electricity.

The authority of any electrical corporation to condemn property shall extend to acquisition of rights needed to construct, operate, and maintain certain electrical infrastructure, described in the act, needed to collect and deliver solar or wind energy to the distribution or transmission grid.

This provision is identical to SB 199 (2025), a provision in SB 214 (2025), SB 1262 (2024), to a provision in SB 805 (2024), a provision in HB 1449 (2024), a provision in SCS/HCS/HB 1746 (2024), provisions in HB 1052 (2023) and substantially similar to a provision in HB 221 (2025), a provision in HCS#2/HBs 440 & 1160 (2025), HB 475 (2025), a provision in SB 139 (2025), HB 1750 (2024), and SB 577 (2023).

JULIA SHEVELEVA

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB888 - Sen. Nick Schroer (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the criminal systems
Summary: SS#3/SB 888 - This act modifies provisions relating to the criminal and juvenile justice system.

FINGERPRINTING OF JUVENILES (SECTION 43.503)

Under current law, an arresting officer is required to take fingerprints to be sent to the central repository if an individual under seventeen years of age who is not currently certified as an adult is taken into custody for an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult. This act requires that an officer take fingerprints from an individual under eighteen years of age for certain felony offenses. This act also repeals a provision that requires fingerprint cards to be made in a manner that does not reveal the juvenile's name to the central repository. Records of a juvenile that has been fingerprinted shall be closed records.

This provision is similar to HB 2498 (2026).

CERTIFICATION OF A JUVENILE AS AN ADULT (SECTION 211.071)

Under current law, if a petition or motion to modify alleges that a child between fourteen and eighteen years of age has committed a felony offense, the court may, upon its own motion or motion by the juvenile officer, the child, or the child's custodian, order a hearing, and exercise its discretion to dismiss the motion or petition to modify and order the child to the court of general jurisdiction. This act modifies the provision so that it applies to offenses that are a class A or B felony, a felony sexual offense, or three felony offenses arising from distinct acts committed within one hundred eighty days of each other. Under this provision, the office of the prosecuting or circuit attorney shall also have the authority to make a motion and present evidence on their motion. Further, this act provides that where a juvenile officer forwards to the prosecuting attorney a class A or B felony that is not certified, the prosecuting attorney must notify the juvenile officer within fourteen days of the decision to certify the case.

Under current law, the juvenile officer may consult with the prosecuting attorney concerning any offense for which the child could be certified as an adult. This act requires the juvenile officer to consult with the prosecuting or circuit attorney. Additionally, the prosecuting or circuit attorney shall be provided with a copy of the completed Missouri Juvenile Detention Assessment Form (JDTA) that was used in determining detention. Use of the JDTA to determine that a child may be held shall be used as a guideline and shall not be mandatory.

Under this act, the juvenile officer shall consider all legally sufficient charges submitted by law enforcement when utilizing the JDTA form and shall provide a copy of the form to the law enforcement agency once a determination has been made. Juvenile officers shall share criminal history data with the Missouri Uniform Law Enforcement System to create a juvenile criminal history database that shall be accessible by criminal justice and law enforcement agencies. Such records maintained by the central repository shall be closed.

JUVENILE DETENTION (SECTION 211.021, 211.331, 211.341, 211.342, & 211.436)

Currently, circuit judges of a judicial circuit may establish a place of juvenile detention for the counties within the circuit court. This act provides that the governing body of a county may provide for juvenile detention in coordination with all other counties within the same circuit court or with all counties of the same circuit court and all counties of an adjoining circuit court. The county governing body shall approve an ordinance, order, or resolution authorizing a place of detention, shall approve an agreement as specified in this act between the counties, and shall notify the presiding circuit judge.

The operation and support of a juvenile detention facility authorized pursuant to this act shall be regulated in accordance with the rules and standards of the Supreme Court of Missouri under the governance of the circuit judge. If two or more counties of adjoining judicial circuits have authorized a place of detention, the circuit judges shall jointly govern the affairs of the place of detention. Furthermore, the counties authorizing a place of detention pursuant to this section may impose, by order, a sales tax up to one percent on all retail sales.

This act provides that a child shall not be placed in leg restraints unless they are charged with a class A or class B felony, or they are determined to be an immediate safety or flight risk.

These provisions are similar to SB 1189 (2026) and SB 809 (2025).

JUVENILE COURT PROCEEDINGS (SECTION 211.319)

This act provides that all juvenile court proceedings for a criminal offense shall not be open to the general public.

LONG-TERM PROGRAM TREATMENT (SECTION 217.362 & 559.115)

The act repeals provisions that do not consider an offender's first incarceration in a Department of Corrections long-term substance abuse program or 120-day program as a previous prison commitment for the purpose of determining a minimum prison term.

PRISON TERMS (SECTION 217.690, 217.760, 557.011, 557.021, 558.011, 558.016, 558.019, 558.026, 558.046, 566.125)

Under current law, any felony offense that is defined outside of this code without a penalty provision is a class E felony. This act adds that any such offense shall also be subject to the imprisonment terms of chapter 558.

Under current law, when a person is found guilty of a felony and sentenced, there is a certain percentage range of the sentence that must be served prior to parole eligibility. This act repeals such provisions and provides that offenders shall serve the following percentage of the imposed term prior to eligibility for parole based upon the felony classification as follows:

1. Class A: 70%

2. Class B: 50%

3. Class C:

• 40% for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender;

• 30% for a first offense;

• 35% for a second offense; and

• 50% for a third or subsequent offense

4. Class D:

• 25% for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender;

• 20% for a first offense;

• 25% for a second offense; and

• 50% for a third or subsequent offense

5. Class E:

• 25% for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender;

• 15% for a first offense;

• 20% for a second offense; and

• 50% for a third or subsequent offense

This act also removes references to the minimum percentage ranges and replaces them with references to the eligibility percentages established in these provisions. Where a person is sentenced to concurrent sentences, such person shall serve the eligibility percentage of the longest sentence prior to parole eligibility. A person that is sentenced to consecutive sentences shall serve the minimum percentage for each felony prior to parole eligibility.

Under current law, there are certain offenses that contain higher parole eligibility percentages. These provisions allow these higher percentages to be unaffected by the new eligibility percentages. Where a person is sentenced to the term of imprisonment for a higher class than the one for which they were found guilty due to their status as a prior or persistent offender, they shall serve the parole eligibility percentage of the higher class.

Any person found guilty of a dangerous felony shall be required to serve eighty-five percent of the given sentence prior to parole eligibility. This act provides that a sentence of life imprisonment shall be calculated to be thirty years. Any sentence that is over seventy-five years shall be calculated to be seventy-five years.

Under current law, a court may sentence a person to an extended term of imprisonment if certain conditions are made. This bill requires that they court sentence a person to an extended term of imprisonment if certain conditions are met.

Sections 558.011 and 558.019 have a delayed effective date of January 1, 2028.

DANGEROUS FELONIES (SECTION 556.061)

This act modifies the definition of "dangerous felony" to include statutory rape in the first degree and statutory sodomy in the first degree. The requirement that the victim of statutory rape in the first degree or sodomy in the first degree be under 12 for the offense to be a dangerous felony is removed. A person found guilty of a "dangerous felony" is required to serve eighty-five percent of their sentence prior to eligibility for parole. Additionally, the act includes the following offenses in the definition of "dangerous felony":

• Abuse through forced labor;

• Trafficking for the purposes of slavery, involuntary servitude, peonage, or forced labor, or the attempt of such offense;

• Trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation, or the attempt of such offense, when the offense was effected by force, abduction, or coercion;

• Sexual trafficking of a child in the first degree;

• Sexual trafficking of a child in the second degree;

• Third offense of failing to register as a sex offender; and

• Endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree.

CONDITIONAL RELEASE (558.011)

This act provides that conditional release terms shall not apply to any person that commits certain class A or B felony offenses after January 1, 2028. Under this act, conditional release provisions are removed from certain sexual offenses and offenses involving children.

This provision is similar to SCS/SB 882, 894, & 1294 (2026) and HB 2637 & 3155 (2026).

JAIL TIME CREDIT (SECTION 558.031)

This act modifies jail time credit. This act requires the form developed by the Office of the State Courts Administrator for offenders committed to the Department of Corrections to include a sentencing calculation, including jail time credit supplemented by a certificate of a sheriff or custodial officer. The act further requires the court, when pronouncing a sentence, executing a suspended sentence, or suspending the imposition of a sentence, to record as part of the judgment, the number of days before the pronouncement of the sentence that the person was in custody related to the offense. Time in custody related to an offense means the time in which the offense was charged in a criminal proceeding, an arrest warrant was issued and served upon the person, and includes time served on house arrest. Time when a person was out on bond or otherwise released is not to be included.

Under this act, the court may take judicial notice of any time the defendant has served in custody by comparing arrest warrant service dates with files of release. Any defendant that was held in a juvenile detention facility prior to adjudication to stand trial as an adult may make a motion to receive credit for time served in such facility.

Under this act a person may challenge any jail time credit awarded or not awarded by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Section 558.031 has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2028.

CRIMINAL OFFENSES (SECTION 566.030, 566.032, 566.060, 566.103, 566.203, 566.209, 566.210, 566.211, 568.045, 568.060 & 589.425)

Currently, the offense of rape in the first degree has a penalty of five years unless certain factors are present. This act modifies this provision by classifying it as a class A felony and increasing the penalty to ten years but not more than thirty years. Under current law, if rape in the first degree is an aggravated sexual offense the authorized term of imprisonment is life imprisonment or a term of years not less than fifteen years. This act removes "a term of years not less than fifteen years" and add "life imprisonment without eligibility for probation or parole. Under current law, a person that was found guilty of rape in the first degree when the child was less than twelve years old, was not eligible for probation or parole until the offender has served at lease thirty years of their sentence or has reached the age of seventy-five years and served at least fifteen years of their sentence. This act repeals this provision.

The authorized term of imprisonment for statutory rape in the first degree, under current law, is life imprisonment or a term of years not less than five years. This act replaces five years with ten years. Under current law, if statutory rape is an aggravated sexual offense the penalty is life imprisonment or a term of years not less than ten years. This act increases the ten years to fifteen years.

Under current law, a person that is found guilty of sodomy in the first degree when the child was less than twelve years old, shall be sentenced to life imprisonment and is not eligible for probation or parole until the offender has served at least thirty years of their sentence or has reached the age of seventy-five years and served at least fifteen years of their sentence. The provision relating to release is repealed. Under this act, the penalty for sodomy in the first degree when the child was less than twelve years old is life imprisonment with or without parole. Where a person commits the offense of sodomy in the first degree and the victim is less than twelve years of age, current law states that "life imprisonment" shall mean imprisonment for the duration of the offender's life. This provision is repealed.

The offense of promoting online sexual solicitation shall be a class E felony, and shall be punishable by imprisonment, fine, or both.

Under current law, the offense of abusing an individual through forced labor carries a penalty of five years to life imprisonment. This act increases the penalty to ten years to life imprisonment.

This act adds "intoxicating or inhibiting substances" to the list of means a person can use to commit the offense of trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation.

Under current law, the offense of sexual trafficking of a child in the second degree if effected by force, abduction, or coercion, carries a penalty of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole until the defendant has served at least twenty-five years. This act modifies that provision by requiring that the defendant serve at least eighty-five percent of a life sentence.

Under current law, a person commits the offense of endangering the welfare of a child if the person commits certain acts to a child that is less than seventeen years old. This act provides that a person commits the offense of endangering the welfare of a child if they commit certain acts to a child that is less than eighteen years old.

Currently, the offense of abuse or neglect of a child is a class D felony with eligibility for probation, parole, or conditional release after serving no less than a year of their sentence. This act repeals the provision allowing for release from imprisonment after serving one year.

This act classifies failing to register a sex offender as a third offense as a class A felony. Currently, a person convicted of failing to register a sex offender as a third offense is eligible for conditional release of parole after serving at least two years of imprisonment. This act repeals that provision.

This act contains a severance clause.

These provisions are similar to SB 1189 (2026), and SB 809 (2025) and contains provisions similar to SB 894 (2026), and SB 882 (2026), and HCS/HB 2637 & 3155 (2026).

TRISTAN BENSON, JR.

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
H - Truly Agreed and Finally Passed

SB994 - Sen. Mike Henderson (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the filing of income tax returns
Summary: SB 994 - This act modifies provisions relating to the filing of income tax returns.

BEGINNING FARMER INCOME TAX DEDUCTION

Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for certain income received for the sale or lease of farmland to beginning farmers. This act adds a definition of "taxpayer" to such deduction. (Section 143.121)

This provision is identical to SB 1291 (2026), SB 682 (2025), and HB 1042 (2025), and to a provision in HCS/SS/SB 67 (2025), HCS/HB 828 (2025), and HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025).

TAX RETURNS

Current law provides that the date for filing income tax returns shall be the fifteenth day of the fourth month following the close of the taxpayer's taxable year. This act provides that such date shall be the date prescribed for the filing of federal tax returns. The act provides that if such date is changed for any reason, the date for filing state income tax returns shall also be changed to such date. (Section 143.511)

This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SB 67 (2025), HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), and HCS/HB 828 (2025).

This act provides that tax return forms for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, shall indicate the name of the public school district in which the taxpayer resides. (Section 143.971)

TAX DEFICIENCIES

This act provides that a taxpayer shall not be liable for penalties or interest on an income tax balance due if such taxpayer is denied part or all of a tax credit to which the taxpayer has qualified pursuant to any provision of law due to lack of available funds, and such denial causes a balance-due notice to be generated by the Department of Revenue or any other redeeming agency. Such taxpayer shall pay the balance due within sixty days or be subject to penalties and interest pursuant to current law. (Section 143.512)

This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SB 67 (2025), HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), and HCS/HB 828 (2025).

This act provides that a taxpayer that has paid a deficiency and any interest, additions to tax, or penalties attributable to such deficiency that is subsequently found to be erroneous, regardless of whether such taxpayer has timely filed a protest with the Director of Revenue, shall be entitled to a refund in the amount of the deficiency and any interest, additions to tax, or penalties attributable to such deficiency that were paid by the taxpayer. Such refund shall be paid as provided in current law. (Section 143.621)

This provision is identical to SB 1377 (2026).

JOSH NORBERG

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/23/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Ways and Means, HR 5

SB1189 - Sen. Jill Carter (R) - Modifies provisions relating to juvenile detention centers
Summary: SB 1189 - Currently, circuit judges of a judicial circuit may establish a place of juvenile detention for the counties within the circuit court. This act provides that a county commission or governing body of a county may provide for juvenile detention in coordination with all other counties within the same circuit court or with all counties of the same circuit court and all counties of an adjoining circuit court. The county commission or governing body shall approve an ordinance, order, or resolution authorizing a place of detention, shall approve an agreement as specified in this act between the counties, and shall notify the presiding circuit judge.

The operation and support of a juvenile detention facility authorized pursuant to this act shall be regulated in accordance with the rules and standards of the Supreme Court of Missouri under the governance of the circuit judge. If two or more counties of adjoining judicial circuits have authorized a place of detention, the circuit judges shall jointly govern the affairs of the place of detention. Furthermore, the counties authorizing a place of detention pursuant to this section may impose, by order, a sales tax up to one percent on all retail sales.

This act is identical to SB 809 (2025).

TRISTAN BENSON, JR.

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/04/2026 

SB1192 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Prohibits higher education accrediting agencies from considering diversity, equity, and inclusion practices
Summary: SB 1192 - This act prohibits agencies that accredit public institutions of higher education from considering diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) practices or procedures, as defined in the act, when making accreditation decisions. Accrediting agencies are also prohibited from collecting information related to DEI or including any DEI-related requirements in their accreditation decisions. Additionally, accrediting agencies shall implement policies ensuring that decision-makers involved in accreditation do not receive or consider information regarding DEI practices or procedures.

Current or former students or employees of a public institution of higher education may bring a civil action against an accrediting agency for violations of this act. If the court finds that the accrediting agency violated the act, the agency shall pay the prevailing party's reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, damages in an amount specified in the act, and civil penalties of up to $1,000 per student who attended the institution at the time when the violation occurred or, if no students attended the institution at the time when the violation occurred, up to $1,000 per student who attended the institution in the immediately preceding semester.

Violations of this act are classified as unlawful discriminatory practices under Missouri human rights law and unfair practices under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. The Attorney General is authorized to investigate and seek appropriate legal remedies for any violations to the full extent permitted by law.

OLIVIA SHANNON

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
S - Removed from Senate Hearing Agenda - 3/24/26 - 8:00 am - Senate Lounge - Senate-Education

SB1399 - Sen. Sandy Crawford (R) - Establishes the Unemployment Administration Adjustment Fund
Summary: SB 1399 - This act requires each employer liable for contributions pursuant to the unemployment compensation law to pay an annual unemployment administration adjustment in an amount equal to five one-hundredths of one percent of such employer's total taxable wages for the twelve-month period ending the preceding June 30. Each employer liable to pay an unemployment administration adjustment shall be notified of the amount due under this act by March thirty-first of each year and such amount shall be considered delinquent thirty days thereafter. The act contains certain exceptions where employers will not be charged. A fund is additionally created into which the contributions required by this act are deposited.

SCOTT SVAGERA

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws

SB1442 - Sen. Brad Hudson (R) - Modifies provisions relating to literacy of elementary school students
Summary: SCS/SB 1442 - This act modifies provisions relating to literacy of elementary school students.

EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS

(Section 161.097)

The act requires educator preparation programs to instruct teacher candidates on the selection and use of "high-quality" reading curricula and instructional materials that do not include the three-cueing system, as such term is defined in current law. The act prohibits educator preparation programs from including instruction in, or endorsement of, the three-cueing system.

Beginning July 1, 2027, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) shall annually review and publicly report on the compliance of educator preparation programs with literacy and reading instruction requirements of current law and those established in the act. The review shall evaluate whether instruction is grounded in the components of evidence-based reading instruction and whether prohibited practices, such as the three-cueing system, are excluded from coursework. Educator preparation programs not in compliance with these requirements shall not be approved to certify new teachers.

STATE AID FOR READING INSTRUCTION

(Section 161.241)

Subject to appropriation, DESE shall remit to each school district and charter school $500 for each fourth grade student who exhibited a substantial reading deficiency in kindergarten to grade three, or who was identified as dyslexic, and who subsequently scores at the proficient level or higher in reading on the annual summative English language arts assessment administered to fourth grade students.

READING ASSESSMENTS

(Sections 167.268 and 167.645)

Under this act, school districts and charter schools shall use state-approved reading assessments to assess the reading readiness all students in grades 1-3 during three annual administration windows established by DESE. If a student is identified as having a substantial reading deficiency based on performance on the most recent assessment, the school district or charter school shall notify the parent of the student that, if the child's substantial reading deficiency is not corrected by the end of third grade, as determined by the student's performance on the reading portion of the statewide English Language Arts assessment, the child shall not be promoted to fourth grade unless the child qualifies for a good cause exemption.

A good cause exemption may be granted to students who are English language learners or who have individualized education plans or 504 plans developed under federal law. A good cause exemption may also be granted to a student who has already been retained at least once in kindergarten to third grade.

To request a good cause exemption, a student's teacher shall submit documentation to the school principal recommending the student's promotion, including the type of exemption being requested and the child's existing reading improvement plan or individualized education plan, as appropriate. The principal shall discuss the recommendation with the teacher and determine whether the student qualifies for a good cause exemption. If the principal determines that the student qualifies for the good cause exemption, the principal shall make such recommendation in writing to the superintendent of the school district or the chief administrative officer or governing board of the charter school, who shall accept or reject the recommendation in writing.

School districts shall assist schools with notifying, and charter schools shall notify, the parents of students who are retained of the reasons for the retention, along with a description of the proposed interventions and supports that will be provided to the child to remedy the identified area or areas of reading deficiency in the following school year.

By October 1 annually, each district school board shall report in writing to DESE certain information regarding reading instruction, such as the board's policies regarding student retention and promotion, the number and percentage of students identified as having reading deficiencies or substantial reading deficiencies, the number and percentage of all students retained in kindergarten to third grade due to substantial reading deficiencies, and the total number and percentage of third-grade students who were promoted with good cause exemptions, as provided in the act.

This act is similar to HB 2872 (2026), HB 2914 (2026), and provisions in SB 1628 (2026).

OLIVIA SHANNON

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/12/2026 
S - Reported Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

SB1458 - Sen. Nick Schroer (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the collection of DNA samples in criminal cases
Summary: SB 1458 - Currently, any person found guilty of a felony offense shall have a fingerprint and DNA sample collected. Additionally, any person over seventeen years of age arrested for certain felony offenses as well as burglary in the first and second degrees must have a fingerprint and DNA sample collected. This act provides that every person seventeen years of age and older who is arrested for any felony offense as well as the offense of burglary in the second degree must have a fingerprint and DNA sample collected.

This act also provides that no additional sample is required if it has been determined that the person's DNA is already included in the DNA database.

TRISTAN BENSON, JR.

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 

SB1466 - Sen. Jamie Burger (R) - Provides for the distribution of moneys related to gaming for a veterans memorial or museum in Perry County and of moneys related to medical cannabis for veteran services
Summary: SB 1466 - This act modifies provisions relating to funds for veteran services, including services funded from moneys from the Veterans Commission Capital Improvement Trust Fund and fees deposited in the Missouri Veterans' Health and Care Fund.

This act provides that funds totaling no more than $500,000 from the Veterans Commission Capital Improvement Trust Fund shall be used for the restoration, renovation, and maintenance of a memorial or museum dedicated to Missouri and United States veterans in Perry County.

Additionally, funds allocated in the Missouri Veterans' Health and Care Fund as administrative and processing fees for duties related to medical cannabis by the Department of Health and Senior Services may be appropriated for services, programs, or projects dedicated to addressing the mental health needs of veterans.

This act is similar to HB 1828 (2026), HB 2244 (2026), SB 745 (2025), and HB 1482 (2025).

KATIE O'BRIEN

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/09/2026 

SB1573 - Sen. Sandy Crawford (R) - Modifies provisions relating to certain children leaving foster care or the custody of the state
Summary: SB 1573 - Under this act, the Children's Division shall provide a child leaving foster care with certain documents and information, including information on how to access medical records and court documents, a letter confirming the child's prior foster care status for purposes of program eligibility, and information on relevant social service programs and supports. Such information shall also be provided to a child's proposed or nominated guardian prior to the child leaving foster care or the custody of the state.

This act requires the Children's Division or the Division of Youth Services, in cases where guardianship of a child is deemed the permanency plan or is being considered by the court, to include any proposed or nominated guardian for a child leaving foster care or state custody in the development of the plan at least six months prior to the child leaving foster care or state custody. The proposed or nominated guardian shall receive a copy of the proposed plan.

SARAH HASKINS

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/09/2026 

SB1575 - Sen. Sandy Crawford (R) - Modifies provisions relating to capital gains taxes
Summary: SB 1575 - Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for 100% of income reported as a capital gain for federal income tax purposes. This act provides that depreciation that has been deducted for federal tax purposes but recovered upon the sale of the asset, and thus treated as ordinary income for federal tax purposes, shall be considered a capital gain and excluded from income tax for state tax purposes. (Section 143.121)

The act also applies such capital gains tax provisions to the taxable income of a resident estate or trust. (Section 143.341)

This act is identical to HB 2945 (2026).

JOSH NORBERG

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/11/2026 

SJR111 - Sen. Brad Hudson (R) - Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Summary: SCS/SJR 111 - Current constitutional provisions require taxing jurisdictions to reduce property tax levies when the total assessed value of property in the taxing jurisdiction increases by more than the percent increase in inflation, with an exception made for levies imposed for the payment of principal and interest on bonds or other indebtedness. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, removes the exemption for debt service levies.

The amendment also provides that, beginning January 1 following the effective date of the amendment, taxing jurisdictions shall calculate levies for each subclass of real property, and shall reduce the levy for any such class if the assessed valuation for such class increases over the previous year, as provided in the amendment.

Additionally, this amendment requires the value of new construction and improvements to be included in the calculation of total assessed valuation for the purpose of calculating property tax levies. (Section 22)

This amendment is substantially similar to HJR 148 (2026).

JOSH NORBERG

Position: No position selected.
Last Action:
03/12/2026