| SB888 - Sen. Nick Schroer (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the criminal systems | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SS#3/SB 888 - This act modifies provisions relating to the criminal and juvenile justice system. FINGERPRINTING OF JUVENILES (SECTION 43.503) Under current law, an arresting officer is required to take fingerprints to be sent to the central repository if an individual under seventeen years of age who is not currently certified as an adult is taken into custody for an offense that would be a felony if committed by an adult. This act requires that an officer take fingerprints from an individual under eighteen years of age for certain felony offenses. This act also repeals a provision that requires fingerprint cards to be made in a manner that does not reveal the juvenile's name to the central repository. Records of a juvenile that has been fingerprinted shall be closed records. This provision is similar to HB 2498 (2026). CERTIFICATION OF A JUVENILE AS AN ADULT (SECTION 211.071) Under current law, if a petition or motion to modify alleges that a child between fourteen and eighteen years of age has committed a felony offense, the court may, upon its own motion or motion by the juvenile officer, the child, or the child's custodian, order a hearing, and exercise its discretion to dismiss the motion or petition to modify and order the child to the court of general jurisdiction. This act modifies the provision so that it applies to offenses that are a class A or B felony, a felony sexual offense, or three felony offenses arising from distinct acts committed within one hundred eighty days of each other. Under this provision, the office of the prosecuting or circuit attorney shall also have the authority to make a motion and present evidence on their motion. Further, this act provides that where a juvenile officer forwards to the prosecuting attorney a class A or B felony that is not certified, the prosecuting attorney must notify the juvenile officer within fourteen days of the decision to certify the case. Under current law, the juvenile officer may consult with the prosecuting attorney concerning any offense for which the child could be certified as an adult. This act requires the juvenile officer to consult with the prosecuting or circuit attorney. Additionally, the prosecuting or circuit attorney shall be provided with a copy of the completed Missouri Juvenile Detention Assessment Form (JDTA) that was used in determining detention. Use of the JDTA to determine that a child may be held shall be used as a guideline and shall not be mandatory. Under this act, the juvenile officer shall consider all legally sufficient charges submitted by law enforcement when utilizing the JDTA form and shall provide a copy of the form to the law enforcement agency once a determination has been made. Juvenile officers shall share criminal history data with the Missouri Uniform Law Enforcement System to create a juvenile criminal history database that shall be accessible by criminal justice and law enforcement agencies. Such records maintained by the central repository shall be closed. JUVENILE DETENTION (SECTION 211.021, 211.331, 211.341, 211.342, & 211.436) Currently, circuit judges of a judicial circuit may establish a place of juvenile detention for the counties within the circuit court. This act provides that the governing body of a county may provide for juvenile detention in coordination with all other counties within the same circuit court or with all counties of the same circuit court and all counties of an adjoining circuit court. The county governing body shall approve an ordinance, order, or resolution authorizing a place of detention, shall approve an agreement as specified in this act between the counties, and shall notify the presiding circuit judge. The operation and support of a juvenile detention facility authorized pursuant to this act shall be regulated in accordance with the rules and standards of the Supreme Court of Missouri under the governance of the circuit judge. If two or more counties of adjoining judicial circuits have authorized a place of detention, the circuit judges shall jointly govern the affairs of the place of detention. Furthermore, the counties authorizing a place of detention pursuant to this section may impose, by order, a sales tax up to one percent on all retail sales. This act provides that a child shall not be placed in leg restraints unless they are charged with a class A or class B felony, or they are determined to be an immediate safety or flight risk. These provisions are similar to SB 1189 (2026) and SB 809 (2025). JUVENILE COURT PROCEEDINGS (SECTION 211.319) This act provides that all juvenile court proceedings for a criminal offense shall not be open to the general public. LONG-TERM PROGRAM TREATMENT (SECTION 217.362 & 559.115) The act repeals provisions that do not consider an offender's first incarceration in a Department of Corrections long-term substance abuse program or 120-day program as a previous prison commitment for the purpose of determining a minimum prison term. PRISON TERMS (SECTION 217.690, 217.760, 557.011, 557.021, 558.011, 558.016, 558.019, 558.026, 558.046, 566.125) Under current law, any felony offense that is defined outside of this code without a penalty provision is a class E felony. This act adds that any such offense shall also be subject to the imprisonment terms of chapter 558. Under current law, when a person is found guilty of a felony and sentenced, there is a certain percentage range of the sentence that must be served prior to parole eligibility. This act repeals such provisions and provides that offenders shall serve the following percentage of the imposed term prior to eligibility for parole based upon the felony classification as follows: 1. Class A: 70% 2. Class B: 50% 3. Class C: • 40% for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender; • 30% for a first offense; • 35% for a second offense; and • 50% for a third or subsequent offense 4. Class D: • 25% for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender; • 20% for a first offense; • 25% for a second offense; and • 50% for a third or subsequent offense 5. Class E: • 25% for an offense that requires registration as a sex offender; • 15% for a first offense; • 20% for a second offense; and • 50% for a third or subsequent offense This act also removes references to the minimum percentage ranges and replaces them with references to the eligibility percentages established in these provisions. Where a person is sentenced to concurrent sentences, such person shall serve the eligibility percentage of the longest sentence prior to parole eligibility. A person that is sentenced to consecutive sentences shall serve the minimum percentage for each felony prior to parole eligibility. Under current law, there are certain offenses that contain higher parole eligibility percentages. These provisions allow these higher percentages to be unaffected by the new eligibility percentages. Where a person is sentenced to the term of imprisonment for a higher class than the one for which they were found guilty due to their status as a prior or persistent offender, they shall serve the parole eligibility percentage of the higher class. Any person found guilty of a dangerous felony shall be required to serve eighty-five percent of the given sentence prior to parole eligibility. This act provides that a sentence of life imprisonment shall be calculated to be thirty years. Any sentence that is over seventy-five years shall be calculated to be seventy-five years. Under current law, a court may sentence a person to an extended term of imprisonment if certain conditions are made. This bill requires that they court sentence a person to an extended term of imprisonment if certain conditions are met. Sections 558.011 and 558.019 have a delayed effective date of January 1, 2028. DANGEROUS FELONIES (SECTION 556.061) This act modifies the definition of "dangerous felony" to include statutory rape in the first degree and statutory sodomy in the first degree. The requirement that the victim of statutory rape in the first degree or sodomy in the first degree be under 12 for the offense to be a dangerous felony is removed. A person found guilty of a "dangerous felony" is required to serve eighty-five percent of their sentence prior to eligibility for parole. Additionally, the act includes the following offenses in the definition of "dangerous felony": • Abuse through forced labor; • Trafficking for the purposes of slavery, involuntary servitude, peonage, or forced labor, or the attempt of such offense; • Trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation, or the attempt of such offense, when the offense was effected by force, abduction, or coercion; • Sexual trafficking of a child in the first degree; • Sexual trafficking of a child in the second degree; • Third offense of failing to register as a sex offender; and • Endangering the welfare of a child in the first degree. CONDITIONAL RELEASE (558.011) This act provides that conditional release terms shall not apply to any person that commits certain class A or B felony offenses after January 1, 2028. Under this act, conditional release provisions are removed from certain sexual offenses and offenses involving children. This provision is similar to SCS/SB 882, 894, & 1294 (2026) and HB 2637 & 3155 (2026). JAIL TIME CREDIT (SECTION 558.031) This act modifies jail time credit. This act requires the form developed by the Office of the State Courts Administrator for offenders committed to the Department of Corrections to include a sentencing calculation, including jail time credit supplemented by a certificate of a sheriff or custodial officer. The act further requires the court, when pronouncing a sentence, executing a suspended sentence, or suspending the imposition of a sentence, to record as part of the judgment, the number of days before the pronouncement of the sentence that the person was in custody related to the offense. Time in custody related to an offense means the time in which the offense was charged in a criminal proceeding, an arrest warrant was issued and served upon the person, and includes time served on house arrest. Time when a person was out on bond or otherwise released is not to be included. Under this act, the court may take judicial notice of any time the defendant has served in custody by comparing arrest warrant service dates with files of release. Any defendant that was held in a juvenile detention facility prior to adjudication to stand trial as an adult may make a motion to receive credit for time served in such facility. Under this act a person may challenge any jail time credit awarded or not awarded by filing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Section 558.031 has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2028. CRIMINAL OFFENSES (SECTION 566.030, 566.032, 566.060, 566.103, 566.203, 566.209, 566.210, 566.211, 568.045, 568.060 & 589.425) Currently, the offense of rape in the first degree has a penalty of five years unless certain factors are present. This act modifies this provision by classifying it as a class A felony and increasing the penalty to ten years but not more than thirty years. Under current law, if rape in the first degree is an aggravated sexual offense the authorized term of imprisonment is life imprisonment or a term of years not less than fifteen years. This act removes "a term of years not less than fifteen years" and add "life imprisonment without eligibility for probation or parole. Under current law, a person that was found guilty of rape in the first degree when the child was less than twelve years old, was not eligible for probation or parole until the offender has served at lease thirty years of their sentence or has reached the age of seventy-five years and served at least fifteen years of their sentence. This act repeals this provision. The authorized term of imprisonment for statutory rape in the first degree, under current law, is life imprisonment or a term of years not less than five years. This act replaces five years with ten years. Under current law, if statutory rape is an aggravated sexual offense the penalty is life imprisonment or a term of years not less than ten years. This act increases the ten years to fifteen years. Under current law, a person that is found guilty of sodomy in the first degree when the child was less than twelve years old, shall be sentenced to life imprisonment and is not eligible for probation or parole until the offender has served at least thirty years of their sentence or has reached the age of seventy-five years and served at least fifteen years of their sentence. The provision relating to release is repealed. Under this act, the penalty for sodomy in the first degree when the child was less than twelve years old is life imprisonment with or without parole. Where a person commits the offense of sodomy in the first degree and the victim is less than twelve years of age, current law states that "life imprisonment" shall mean imprisonment for the duration of the offender's life. This provision is repealed. The offense of promoting online sexual solicitation shall be a class E felony, and shall be punishable by imprisonment, fine, or both. Under current law, the offense of abusing an individual through forced labor carries a penalty of five years to life imprisonment. This act increases the penalty to ten years to life imprisonment. This act adds "intoxicating or inhibiting substances" to the list of means a person can use to commit the offense of trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation. Under current law, the offense of sexual trafficking of a child in the second degree if effected by force, abduction, or coercion, carries a penalty of life imprisonment without eligibility for parole until the defendant has served at least twenty-five years. This act modifies that provision by requiring that the defendant serve at least eighty-five percent of a life sentence. Under current law, a person commits the offense of endangering the welfare of a child if the person commits certain acts to a child that is less than seventeen years old. This act provides that a person commits the offense of endangering the welfare of a child if they commit certain acts to a child that is less than eighteen years old. Currently, the offense of abuse or neglect of a child is a class D felony with eligibility for probation, parole, or conditional release after serving no less than a year of their sentence. This act repeals the provision allowing for release from imprisonment after serving one year. This act classifies failing to register a sex offender as a third offense as a class A felony. Currently, a person convicted of failing to register a sex offender as a third offense is eligible for conditional release of parole after serving at least two years of imprisonment. This act repeals that provision. This act contains a severance clause. These provisions are similar to SB 1189 (2026), and SB 809 (2025) and contains provisions similar to SB 894 (2026), and SB 882 (2026), and HCS/HB 2637 & 3155 (2026). TRISTAN BENSON, JR. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 211.021, 211.071, 211.319, 211.331, 211.341, 211.436, 211.342, 217.362, 217.690, 217.760, 43.503, 556.061, 557.011, 557.021, 558.011, 558.016, 558.019, 558.026, 558.031, 558.046, 559.115, 566.030, 566.032, 566.060, 566.103, 566.125, 566.203, 566.209, 566.210, 566.211, 568.045, 568.060, 589.425 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | Governor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/23/2026
G
- Sent to the Governor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/23/2026
G
- Sent to the Governor
03/12/2026
H
- Truly Agreed and Finally Passed
03/12/2026
H
- Third Read and Passed - Y-97 N-53
03/12/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/11/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review
03/11/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review
03/10/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review
03/10/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
03/10/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
03/10/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
03/10/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Corrections and Public Institutions
03/10/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Corrections and Public Institutions
03/10/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Corrections and Public Institutions
03/09/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Corrections and Public Institutions, HR 6
03/09/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Corrections and Public Institutions
03/09/2026
H
- Read Second Time
03/05/2026
H
- Reported to the House and read first time
03/05/2026
S
- Third Read and Passed - Y-20 N-9
03/05/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
03/05/2026
S
- Reported Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
03/05/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
03/05/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/05/2026, 9:45 AM - Senate-Fiscal Oversight, Senate Lounge
03/04/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
03/04/2026
S
- Perfected (3:30 am)
03/04/2026
S
- Floor Substitute Adopted
03/04/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
03/04/2026
S
- Placed on Informal Calendar (10:40 pm)
03/04/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
02/10/2026
S
- Placed on Informal Calendar
02/10/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
02/03/2026
S
- Reported Do Pass - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
01/21/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
01/14/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
01/12/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/14/2026, 8:00 AM - Senage-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence, Senate Lounge
01/08/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
01/08/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
S
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB1694 - Rep. Mazzie Christensen (R) - Establishes the "Act Against Abusive Website Access Litigation" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | HCS HBs 1694, 1674, 1780, 2056, 2312 & 1755 -- ABUSIVE WEBSITE ACCESS LITIGATION (Christensen) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on General Laws This bill creates the "Act Against Abusive Website Access Litigation". If an allegation is made that a website is in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), the Attorney General or an adversely affected resident of this State can file a civil action against the party, attorney, or law firm claiming that an ADA violation has occurred. The civil action will ask for a determination as to whether the alleged website access violation is abusive litigation. If the court determines that the litigation is abusive, the court can award reasonable attorney's fees and costs, and punitive damages not to exceed three times the amount of attorney's fees awarded by the court. In determining whether any litigation that alleges any website access violation is abusive, the court must consider the totality of the circumstances to determine if the primary purpose of the litigation that alleges a website access violation is obtaining a payment from a defendant. To make such a determination, the court can assess the following factors: (1) Whether the same plaintiff, attorney, or law firm has filed a high number of substantially similar actions without meaningful efforts to resolve or improve accessibility; (2) Whether the plaintiff provided the defendant with reasonable notice and an opportunity to correct the alleged barrier prior to filing suit; (3) Any history of sanctions or findings of bad faith against the plaintiff or counsel; (4) Whether the filing party or lawyer filing the litigation is a resident of this State or is licensed to practice law in this State; (5) The nature of settlement discussions and the reasonableness of settlement offers and refusals to settle; and (6) Whether the plaintiff or the lawyer filing on behalf of the plaintiff violated Missouri Supreme Court rules pertaining to the signing all pleadings and motions. If the defendant who is alleged to have violated the ADA's rules on website access in good faith attempts to correct the alleged violations within 90 days after receiving written notice, the defendant will have a rebuttable presumption that any subsequent claim for a website accessibility violation is abusive. Nothing will prohibit a defendant from filing a motion to dismiss or from notifying the plaintiff prior to the expiration of the 90-day period that the alleged accessibility violation has been corrected in good faith. The rebuttable presumption can be overcome by showing that the defendant failed to complete reasonable corrective measures within 90 days or acted in bad faith. The court must not make a determination as to whether or not the alleged ADA website access violation is abusive until after the 90 day period expires, or the alleged violation is corrected, whichever occurs first. The Attorney General can intervene or bring an action on behalf of affected residents or entities that have been targeted by abusive website access litigation and issue guidance to clarify when such litigation practices are to be deemed abusive. This bill is similar to HB 1674; HB 1755; HB 1780; HB 1842; and HB 2056 (2026). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 537.1250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | Senate: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/25/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/25/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws
03/24/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 12:00 PM - Senate-General Laws, SCR 1
02/26/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws
02/26/2026
S
- Read Second Time
02/05/2026
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
02/05/2026
H
- Third Read and Passed - Y-149 N-0
02/05/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
02/04/2026
H
- Perfected
02/04/2026
H
- Committee substitute adopted
02/04/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
01/29/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
01/29/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
01/27/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/29/2026, 9:30 AM - ** REVISED to ADD HB 2061 ** - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
01/27/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
01/22/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-General Laws
01/21/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-General Laws
01/15/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/21/2026, 4:00 PM - House-General Laws, HR 7
01/14/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-General Laws
01/13/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/14/2026, 4:00 PM - House-General Laws, HR 7
01/08/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-General Laws
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2103 - Rep. Phil Amato (R) - Modifies provisions governing documents filed or recorded with the recorder of deeds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | HCS HB 2103 -- PROTECTIONS AGAINST DOCUMENT FRAUD (Amato) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 486.735, 570.095, 578.700, 59.120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | Senate: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/31/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Insurance and Banking
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/31/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Insurance and Banking
03/31/2026
S
- Read Second Time
03/19/2026
S
- Read First Time
03/16/2026
S
- Reported to the Senate and not read
03/12/2026
H
- Third Read and Passed - Y-134 N-5
03/12/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/11/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review
03/11/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review
03/10/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/11/2026, 9:30 AM - House - Fiscal Review, HR 4
03/05/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/09/2026, 2:30 PM - ** REVISED to ADD HB 1800 ** - House-Fiscal Review, HR 4
03/05/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review
03/04/2026
H
- Perfected
03/04/2026
H
- Committee substitute adopted
03/04/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
02/23/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
02/23/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
02/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/23/2026, 2:00 PM - House - Rules - Administrative, HR 4
02/12/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
02/04/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Financial Institutions
02/04/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Financial Institutions
01/29/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Financial Institutions, HR 1
01/15/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/21/2026, 12:00 PM - ** REVISED to ADD HB 2116 ** - House-Financial Institutions, HR 1
01/14/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Financial Institutions
01/12/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/14/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Financial Institutions, HR 1
01/08/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Financial Institutions
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/02/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SB907 - Sen. Brad Hudson (R) - Establishes the "Act Against Abusive Website Access Litigation" which establishes provisions relating to litigation alleging certain disability access violations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SCS/SBs 907, 1154 & 1272 - This act creates the "Act Against Abusive Website Access Litigation". The Attorney General on behalf of a class of residents of this state who are subject to litigation that alleges any website access violation, or any resident of this state who is subject to litigation that alleges any website access violation, may file a civil action against the party, attorney, or law firm that initiated such litigation for a determination as to whether such litigation alleging a website access violation is abusive litigation. A civil action alleging a website access claim is considered abusive only if the court, based on the totality of the circumstances, finds the primary purpose of the litigation was to obtain a monetary settlement unrelated to improving accessibility or enforcing accessibility rights. The act describes the factors to be considered in making this determination.
A defendant who receives notice of an alleged website access violation and in good faith takes substantial steps to correct the violation within 90 days shall have a rebuttable presumption that any subsequent claim for a website access violation is abusive. There shall not be a presumption if the alleged violation is not corrected within 90 days after written notice or service of the petition.
Additionally, nothing in this act shall prevent a defendant from filing a motion to dismiss or from notifying the plaintiff, prior to the end of the 90-day period, that the alleged access violation has been corrected in good faith.
The Attorney General may intervene or bring an action on behalf of Missouri residents that are targets of abusive website access litigation. The Attorney General may also issue guidance as to when litigation practices are deemed abusive, but such guidance shall not preclude legitimate accessibility enforcement actions.
The court may award attorney's fees to the party defending against the abusive litigation. The court may also award punitive damages or sanctions not to exceed three times the amount of attorney's fees awarded by the court.
If the U.S. Department of Justice issues standards concerning website accessibility under the federal Americans with Disabilities Act, the provisions of this act shall expire.
This act is similar to HCS/HBs to HB 1694, 1674, 1780, 2056, 2312 & 1755 (2026), HB 1842 (2026), and HB 2150 (2026). KATIE O'BRIEN |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 537.1250 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
04/01/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Commerce
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
04/01/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Commerce
03/31/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/01/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 6
03/26/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Commerce
03/26/2026
H
- Read Second Time
03/25/2026
H
- Reported to the House and read first time
03/25/2026
S
- Third Read and Passed - Y-32 N-0
03/25/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
03/24/2026
S
- Perfected
03/24/2026
S
- Floor Substitute Adopted
03/24/2026
S
- Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 1
03/24/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
03/09/2026
S
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - Senate-General Laws
02/25/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-General Laws
02/24/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/25/2026, 12:00 PM - Senate-General Laws, SCR 1
02/04/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws
02/02/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/04/2026, 10:30 AM - Senate-General Laws, Senate Lounge
01/08/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws
01/08/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
S
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SJR87 - Sen. Jill Carter (R) - Modifies provisions relating to sheriffs | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SJR 87 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that each county shall elect a sheriff for a term of four years by a majority of the qualified voters of the county. This constitutional amendment shall not apply to St. Louis City, St. Louis County, or St. Charles County.
Additionally, the sheriff shall commit to jail all felons and traitors as well as other duties as provided in the act. The sheriff may be removed from office by a quo warranto petition brought by the Attorney General.
This amendment is identical to SS/SCS/SJR 40 (2025), is substantially similar to HJR 61 (2025) and HJR 71 (2025), and is similar to SJR 75 (2024). TRISTAN BENSON, JR. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/31/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Crime and Public Safety
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/31/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Crime and Public Safety
03/26/2026
H
- Read Second Time
03/25/2026
H
- Reported to the House and read first time
03/25/2026
S
- Third Read and Passed - Y-24 N-7
03/25/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
03/25/2026
S
- Reported Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
03/25/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
03/24/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
03/24/2026
S
- Perfected
03/24/2026
S
- Floor Substitute Adopted
03/24/2026
S
- Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 1
03/24/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
03/09/2026
S
- Reported Do Pass - Senate-General Laws
02/18/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-General Laws
02/11/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws
02/10/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/11/2026, 12:00 PM - Senate-General Laws, SCR 1
01/27/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws
01/27/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
S
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2944 - Rep. Hardy Billington (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the local senior citizen homestead tax credit | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | HCS HB 2944 -- SENIOR CITIZEN HOMESTEAD TAX CREDIT (Billington) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 137.1050 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: 3rd Reading | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
03/30/2026
H
- Third Read and Passed - Y-145 N-4
03/30/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/25/2026
H
- Perfected
03/25/2026
H
- Committee substitute adopted
03/25/2026
H
- Floor Amendment(s) Adopted -1
03/25/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/11/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/10/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/09/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
03/04/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
02/25/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
02/24/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
02/23/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/24/2026, 4:00 PM - **REVISED for ROOM and TIME CHANGE** - House - Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 1
02/16/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/17/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 6
02/10/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
02/06/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/10/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 6
02/03/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
01/14/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/13/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB1736 - Rep. Colin Wellenkamp (R) - Modifies provisions governing county sales taxes for park purposes to allow tax revenues to be used for storm water management projects in parks | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Conservation and Natural Resources by a vote of 12 to 0. This bill allows sales taxes collected by a county for the purpose of funding a metropolitan park or recreation district to be used by the county for storm water management projects that are confined to the acquisition of land for the building of a park or greenway, or the deployment and augmentation of natural infrastructure or features, that would otherwise add to the benefits of the park to the community. This bill is similar to HCS HB 1271 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that natural infrastructure can handle storm water more efficiently and less expensively than other storm water infrastructure. This bill would provide a funding mechanism for cities to fund natural storm water initiatives. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Wellenkamp; Sierra Club, Missouri Chapter; and St. Charles County. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 67.1754 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/10/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/09/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
02/24/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
02/04/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
02/03/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
02/02/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/03/2026, 4:00 PM - House-Conservation and Natural Resources, HR 1
02/02/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
01/29/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/02/2026, 1:00 PM - House - Conservation and Natural Resources, HR 7
01/25/2026
H
- Committee hearing cancelled - 1/26/26 - 12:00 pm - HR 7 - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
01/22/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/26/2026, 12:00 PM - ** CANCELLED ** - House-Conservation and Natural Resources, HR 7
01/15/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2179 - Rep. David Casteel (R) - Modifies the process by which public notice is required to be published in charter counties | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill requires any county with a charter form of government to publish statutorily-required notices on the internet as well as in a newspaper. The bill also requires the Secretary of State to develop a page on the office's website on which these notices can be accessed by the public. This bill is similar to HB 377 (2025). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 493.220 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/31/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Legislative Review
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/31/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Legislative Review
03/27/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/31/2026, 12:30 PM - House-Legislative Review, HR 5
02/10/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Legislative Review
02/05/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/10/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Legislative Review, HR 5
01/29/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Legislative Review
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/04/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2474 - Rep. John Voss (R) - Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing
Committee on Economic Development by a vote of 15 to 0.
The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2474. This bill adds "progressive design-build contracts", as defined in the bill, to numerous provisions of law related to design- build contracts. Currently, a design criteria consultant must be employed by a political subdivision to perform certain tasks related to design- build projects. This bill allows a design criteria consultant to be employed by a political subdivision, but does not require it. The bill outlines the necessary elements of a request for proposal for a progressive design-build contract. Political subdivisions are required to solicit proposals in a two -stage process. Phase I is the solicitation and evaluation of the qualifications of design-builders. Phase II is the solicitation and evaluation of proposals describing the design- builder's approach to design development, preconstruction services, and construction of the project. Various criteria that the political subdivision must consider during each phase are described in the bill. The political subdivision has the discretion to disqualify any design-builder that the political subdivision finds lacks the minimum qualifications required to perform the work. The political subdivision will use criteria described in the bill to select no more than three but no less than two qualified design-builders, who will be given a specified amount of time to assemble phase II proposals. Evaluation of phase II proposals must be qualifications-based. Price considerations are for the preconstruction phase services only. The political subdivision will rank the phase II proposals according to criteria described in the bill. Following the evaluation, the political subdivision can enter into negotiations with the highest-ranked design-builder to establish a preconstruction agreement. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the political subdivision can begin negotiations with the next highest-ranked design-builder. During the preconstruction phase, the design-builder and the political subdivision will collaborate to establish a fixed contract amount or a guaranteed maximum price. Upon acceptance of the price and contract terms, the parties may amend the contract to authorize construction. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will allow Missouri to be more competitive with other states like Kansas that have similar progressive design-build contracts. Some say that this bill will help bring more economic development to Missouri. This bill will lead to cost savings for taxpayers, as this is a smoother process for local municipalities to enter and leave contracts based on work being completed, or at their own discretion, if needed, in the early stages of the contract. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Voss; Doug Wesselschmidt, City of Grandview; Joe Perry; American Council of Engineering Companies of Missouri; Design-Build Institute of America-Midwest; Missouri Municipal League; Lynne Schlosser, Missouri Public Utility Alliance; Burns & McDonnell; Greater KC Chamber of Commerce; The Builders? Association/KC Chapter, AGC. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 67.5060 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/25/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/25/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
03/03/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Economic Development
03/03/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Economic Development
02/25/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/03/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Economic Development, HR 1
02/24/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Economic Development
02/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/24/2026, 8:00 AM - ** REVISED to REMOVE HB 1915 ** - House - Economic Development, HR 1
02/12/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Economic Development
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/17/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2830 - Rep. Kimberly-Ann Collins (D) - Changes a user fee collected by recorders of deeds for the Missouri housing trust fund from three dollars to nine dollars | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on
Emerging Issues by a vote of 12 to 0.
Currently, a fee of three dollars per recorded instrument is charged and collected by every recorder in the State as a condition to the recording of certain instruments. The proceeds of that fee are deposited into the Missouri Housing Trust Fund. This bill increases the fee to nine dollars. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that currently, there is not nearly enough affordable housing to meet the needs of many local jurisdictions. This bill will generate more revenue for the fight against homelessness by keeping user fees up to date with inflation. Supporters further state that with the construction of more housing, many more jobs will be created as well. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Collins; Anthony D'agostino; Jonathan Belcher, Peter and Paul Community Services; Lucas Caldwell-Mcmillan, Empower Missouri; Mary J. Clark, Love Columbia; Susan Cook, River City Habitat For Humanity; and Missouri Coalition of Recovery Support Providers. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 59.319 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/23/2026
H
- Placed on Informal Calendar
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/23/2026
H
- Placed on Informal Calendar
02/23/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
02/23/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
02/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/23/2026, 2:00 PM - House - Rules - Administrative, HR 4
02/18/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
02/18/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Emerging Issues
02/16/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Emerging Issues
02/12/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/16/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Emerging Issues, HR 7
02/09/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Emerging Issues
02/05/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/09/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Emerging Issues, HR 7
02/03/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2898 - Rep. Bill Owen (R) - Modifies provisions relating to boards of directors of newly established land bank agencies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | HB 2898 -- UNPAID TAXES AND FEES (Owen)
COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Local Government Currently, under Section 140.982, RSMo, if a county establishes a land bank agency, the members of the first board of directors must be appointed within 90 days, and if an appointing authority does not make a required appointment on time, the appointment will be made by the county council. This bill repeals this provision and allows the county council to provide for the qualifications for members of the board of directors as part of an establishing ordinance, resolution, or rule. The board of directors of the land bank agency will consist of seven members appointed by the county executive. Current law provides that if an appointing authority fails to fill a vacancy within 60 days after a term expires, the county council will make the appointment. This bill modifies how the county land bank board is appointed. Under the provisions of this bill, the seven-member board will be appointed by the county executive, who will be required to fill any vacancy within 60 days. Currently, a county that elects to operate under alternative delinquent sale tax provisions may only include parcels with unpaid taxes that have been delinquent for at least two years. This bill removes the two-year delinquency requirement, allowing counties that opt-in to the alternative process to include delinquent parcels regardless of how long the taxes have remained unpaid. Land bank agencies are currently prohibited from selling property to the original owner of the parcel or to certain close relatives of the original owner. This bill removes the prohibition on sales to relatives of the original owner, while maintaining other purchaser eligibility requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 140.010, 140.190, 140.250, 140.420, 140.980, 140.981, 140.982, 140.983, 140.984, 140.985, 140.986, 140.987, 140.988, 140.991, 140.994, 140.995, 140.1000, 140.1009, 140.1012, 141.220, 141.230, 141.250, 141.270, 141.290, 141.300, 141.320, 141.330, 141.360, 141.410, 141.440, 141.500, 141.520, 141.535, 141.540, 141.550, 141.560, 141.570, 141.580, 141.610, 141.620, 141.680, 141.700, 141.819, 141.980, 141.984, 141.1009, 141.1020, 249.255 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
H
- Perfected
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
H
- Perfected
03/30/2026
H
- Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 1
03/30/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/11/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/10/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/09/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
03/05/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
02/19/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Local Government
02/18/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Local Government
02/16/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/18/2026, 8:30 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
02/11/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
02/05/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/11/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
02/05/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Local Government
01/13/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/12/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/12/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2925 - Rep. Ron Fowler (R) - Modifies provisions governing local property tax ballots | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on
Property Tax Reform by a vote of 11 to 8.
Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill requires any question submitted to voters by a political subdivision desiring to levy a real property or personal property tax to be submitted only on a general election day. The bill standardizes ballot language for questions submitted to voters by a political subdivision desiring to levy a real property or personal property tax. Currently, ballot language often describes a desired tax as a specified amount on each $100 of assessed valuation. This bill requires ballot language to describe the desired tax as a specified amount per $100,000 of appraised value, depending on whether the property is residential, commercial, agricultural, or a motor vehicle. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill standardizes how property tax information is portrayed to voters on ballots by requiring property tax levy questions to be worded in a certain way. Those in support of the bill state that the bill will provide for consistency in property tax ballots. Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Fowler. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that moving so many questions and local ballots to November will stress election authorities. Opponents state that the longer ballots will cause more voter fatigue. Testifying in person against the bill was Missouri Association Of Counties. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 115.706, 137.037, 137.065, 137.565, 137.570, 137.1040, 137.1050, 162.223, 162.441, 162.840, 164.021, 164.151, 167.231, 178.881, 182.010, 182.020, 182.030, 182.100, 182.140, 182.650, 182.655, 182.715, 182.717, 184.350, 184.351, 184.353, 184.357, 184.359, 184.600, 184.604, 184.614, 190.040, 190.065, 190.074, 190.296, 198.260, 198.263, 198.310, 204.250, 205.563, 205.979, 206.070, 206.120, 210.860, 233.172, 233.200, 233.345, 233.455, 233.460, 233.510, 235.175, 238.232, 247.470, 249.110, 249.929, 249.1106, 249.1150, 250.060, 256.445, 257.360, 257.370, 262.598, 263.452, 263.472, 278.240, 278.280, 321.225, 321.240, 321.241, 321.243, 321.244, 321.610, 321.620, 64.401, 650.399, 650.408, 66.265, 67.799, 67.990, 67.1422, 67.1531, 67.1880, 68.235, 68.250, 71.800, 71.802, 80.460, 90.500, 92.010, 92.031, 92.035, 94.060, 94.070, 94.250, 94.260, 94.340, 94.350, 94.400, 95.150, 95.390 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/26/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/25/2026
H
- ** REVISED for TIME ** - 3/26/26 - 10:30 or Upon Adjournment - HR 4 - House-Rules-Legislative
03/25/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/26/2026, 10:30 AM - ** REVISED for TIME ** - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
03/24/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
03/12/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
03/12/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
03/10/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/12/2026, 9:00 AM - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 5
03/05/2026
H
- Returned to committee of origin - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
03/04/2026
H
- ** REVISED for TIME ** - 3/5/26 - 11:15 am or Upon Adjournment - HR 4 - House-Rules-Legislative
03/04/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/05/2026, 11:15 AM - ** REVISED to ADD HJR 173 ** - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
02/26/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
02/18/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
02/03/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Special Interim Committee on Property Tax Reform
01/29/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/03/2026, 12:00 PM - House - Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 6
01/29/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
01/29/2026
H
- ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 1/29/26 - 10:30 am or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
01/27/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/29/2026, 10:30 AM - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 7
01/26/2026
H
- Committee hearing cancelled - 1/27/26 - 12:00 pm - HR 6 - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
01/22/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/27/2026, 12:00 PM - ** CANCELLED ** - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 6
01/15/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
01/15/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
01/13/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/12/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2964 - Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R) - Changes the dates upon which property taxes are due and delinquent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill changes the dates property taxes are billed and due. Currently, property taxes are billed at least 30 days prior to the delinquent date, are due on December 31st of each year, and are considered delinquent if they are delivered on or after January 1st. This bill moves the billing date to the end of February, the date taxes are due to the end of March, and the date the taxes are delinquent to April 1st. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 139.100, 140.010, 140.730, 52.230, 52.240, 52.285 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/04/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/05/2026, 9:00 AM - House - Special Committee on Tax Reform, HR 1
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/04/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/05/2026, 9:00 AM - House - Special Committee on Tax Reform, HR 1
02/26/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform
02/24/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/26/2026, 8:00 AM - House - Special Committee on Tax Reform, HR 1
02/19/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform
01/14/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/13/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB3120 - Rep. Burt Whaley (R) - Modifies provisions relating to the signature of the county treasurer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill allows only the county treasurer's signature to be authorized on any bank signature card, deposit agreement, or other authorization document for any account maintained in a county depositary for county funds under the treasurer's custody. No other county official or employee of the county other than the county treasurer can be listed as the signer on any such account. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 110.240 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/11/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/11/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
03/09/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/11/2026, 8:00 AM - House - Local Government, HR 5
02/24/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Local Government
01/29/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/28/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB3253 - Rep. Kathy Steinhoff (D) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special
Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 11 to 0.
The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3253 & 3254. ASSESSORS (Section 53.255, 137.121, 137.180, 137.355, 137.490) Currently, the State Tax Commission (STC) must set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours for each course of study for assessors and assessor-elects. This bill adds that the State Tax Commission must either set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours or at least 40 hours for any new assessor or assessor-elect and at least 40 hours of training for any newly elected assessor. The bill requires each assessor to attend at least one additional approved course of study within each 2-year period to remain certified. Currently, the Director of Revenue must suspend payments of assessment costs by the State to the county in which the assessor is serving once notified by the Commission that the assessor has failed to properly comply with certification requirements and until the assessor complies or is no longer in office. This bill repeals this provision and allows an assessor to: (1) Create, maintain, and store certain information in an electronic format; (2) Establish electronic notification and record delivery systems; (3) Notify property owners of an increased valuation or projected tax liability via first-class mail or by electronic means; and (4) Provide other official communication electronically. Currently, when an assessor increases the valuation of any real property they must notify the record owner of the increase, either in person, or by mail to the last known address of the owner, this bill specifies first-class mail and adds that the valuation may be sent by electronic means, including email or secure electronic delivery, as long as the property owner has consented to electronic delivery or has provided an email address to the assessor's office. PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES (Section 139.031 and 139.053) The bill allows the governing body of any county to provide for partial payments on residential real property taxes assessed and in dispute in certain circumstances. The county may enter into an agreement with a taxpayer to require the taxpayer to make a minimum payment as described in the bill. If a taxpayer fails to make the initial approved partial payment on or before the due date in the agreement, the county must charge the taxpayer interest and penalties on the amount of property taxes still owed. Currently, any county other than a township county may, by order or ordinance, allow its taxpayers the option to pay any part of their real and personal property taxes on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis. This bill allows township counties the option to pass such an order or ordinance. The bill also requires the governing body of each county or city not within a county to allow for pre-payment of current real property taxes owed on an annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or monthly basis. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill addresses topics that were discussed during the property tax hearings that occurred across the state. Those in support of the bill say it addresses per parcel rate to fund assessment resources, payment requirements when an assessment is under appeal, training for assessors, use of technology during assessments, and property tax levies by subclass. Supporters state that giving additional resources to assessors, requiring additional training for assessors, and provisions that help taxpayers to make their payments will be good for special districts. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Steinhoff; and Missouri Special Districts Association. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that the idea for state reimbursement to counties is good, but the question is where the funds for this reimbursement will come from. Those testifying state that the State Tax Commission (STC) must be responsible for ensuring there is fairness in assessments via equalization. Others testifying on the bill say that commissioners from the STC do not have mandatory trainings, but they do often attend trainings. Testifying in person on the bill were Missouri Council Of School Administrators; and Dan Hutton, State Tax Commission/State Ombudsman. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 137.180, 137.355, 137.490, 137.121, 139.031, 139.053, 53.255 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/12/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/12/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
03/12/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
03/10/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/12/2026, 9:00 AM - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 5
03/04/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/05/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 5
02/26/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
02/25/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/26/2026, 12:00 PM - House - Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 1
02/19/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
02/11/2026
H
- Read Second Time
02/10/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB3254 - Rep. Will Jobe (D) - Modifies provisions relating to property tax | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | ASSESSORS (Section 53.255, 137.121, 137.180, 137.355, and
137.490)
Currently, the State Tax Commission (STC) must set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours for each course of study for assessors and assessor-elects. This bill adds that the STC must set classroom time totaling at least 40 hours for any new assessor or assessor-elect beginning January 1, 2027. Any newly elected assessor must complete at least 40 hours of training before assuming office. This bill requires assessors to attend at least one additional approved course of study within each 2-year period to remain certified. Currently, once the state director of revenue is notified by the STC that an assessor has failed to comply with certification requirements, the state director of revenue must immediately suspend payments of assessment costs to the county in which the assessor is serving. These payments must be suspended until one of the following occurs: (1) The assessor complies with certification requirements; (2) The assessor resigns from office; (3) The assessor is removed from office by appropriate legal action; or (4) The assessor?s successor is qualified. The bill repeals this provision. This bill requires the assessor to conduct a physical inspection of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property before the assessor can increase the assessed valuation of such parcel of real property by more than 15%. The bill allows county assessors to use technology to determine the true value in money of real property if it is used in accordance with accepted mass appraisal standards. This bill also allows authorized technology to be used to satisfy any physical inspection requirements. The bill allows assessors to: (1) Create, maintain, and store certain information in an electronic format; (2) Establish electronic notification and record delivery systems; (3) Notify property owners of an increased valuation or projected tax liability via first-class mail or by electronic means; and (4) Provide other official communication electronically. PROPERTY TAX RATES (Section 137.073, 137.079, 137.115) Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase may levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate. The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate. Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property, in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline. As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces such language with that relating to multiple tax rates. Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill no. 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county may also opt out of implementing certain provisions of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill no. 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes. This bill repeals the references to the provisions of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and Senate bill no. 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt out of or to implement such provisions. The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county to determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate. ASSESSMENT MAINTENANCE PLANS (Section 137.750) Currently, the State must reimburse each eligible county a minimum of $3.00 per parcel for up to 20,000 parcels if the county has an approved assessment maintenance plan. This bill increases the minimum to $4.00 per parcel. . PROPERTY TAX CREDITS (Section 137.1050 and 137.1055) Currently, any county that is authorized to impose a property tax may grant a property tax credit to seniors who own a qualifying homestead. The bill requires the State to reimburse any political subdivision for any decrease in revenue due to this authorized tax credit. Currently, certain counties must place on the ballot a question whether to grant a homestead property tax credit to limit the increase of an eligible taxpayer?s real property tax liability on his or her homestead. This bill requires the State to reimburse any political subdivision for any decrease in revenue due to this authorized tax credit. PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES (Section 139.031 and 139.053) The bill allows the governing body of any county to provide for partial payments on residential real property taxes assessed and in dispute in certain circumstances. Such county can enter into an agreement with a taxpayer to require the taxpayer to make a minimum payment, as described in the bill. If a taxpayer fails to make the initial approved partial payment on or before the due date stated in the agreement, the county must charge the taxpayer interest on the amount of property taxes still owed. Currently, the governing body of any county can allow, by ordinance or order, the option for taxpayers to pay any part of their real and personal property taxes on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis. However, township counties are excluded from the ability to allow taxpayers these payment options. This bill allows township counties the option to pass such an order or ordinance. The bill also requires the governing body of each county or city not within a county to allow for pre-payment of current real property taxes owed on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis. This bill is similar to HB 3253 (2026). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 137.073, 137.079, 137.115, 137.180, 137.355, 137.490, 137.750, 137.1050, 137.1055, 137.121, 139.031, 139.053, 53.255 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/12/2026
H
- Superseded by HB 3253
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/12/2026
H
- Superseded by HB 3253
03/12/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
03/12/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
03/10/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/12/2026, 9:00 AM - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 5
03/04/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/05/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 5
02/26/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
02/25/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/26/2026, 12:00 PM - House - Special Committee on Property Tax Reform, HR 1
02/19/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform
02/11/2026
H
- Read Second Time
02/10/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB3496 - Rep. Rodger Reedy (R) - Modifies salary schedules for county officials | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill increases the statutory salary schedules for various
county officials. The salary increase will affect all terms
beginning after August 28, 2026.
In addition to the changed salary schedules in the bill, certain salary schedules will be adjusted each year based on a calculation provided in the bill. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 473.742, 49.082, 50.327, 50.334, 51.281, 52.269, 53.082, 54.261, 54.320, 55.091, 58.095 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
04/01/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Local Government
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
04/01/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Local Government
03/30/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/01/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
03/25/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
03/23/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
03/05/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Local Government
02/27/2026
H
- Read Second Time
02/26/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HJR107 - Rep. Mike Steinmeyer (R) - Proposes a Constitutional amendment authorizing the separation of Kansas City from Jackson County upon approval by the voters | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment would initiate the separation of Kansas City from Jackson County. The amendment establishes a "City-County Transition Committee" to facilitate the separation of the city and the county. The makeup of the committee is established in the amendment. The Committee must establish a proposed plan, submit the plan to the governing bodies of the city and the county, and submit a progress report to the General Assembly every six months until the separation of the city from the county is complete. Items that must be considered in the proposed plan to separate the city from the county are provided in the amendment. After the proposed plan is established and presented to the governing bodies of the city and the county, the election authorities will submit the question of whether to adopt the proposed plan to voters of the city and county on the next available day for a municipal election. If the plan is approved by a majority of voters, the governing bodies of the city and county must begin the process of implementing the proposed plan. If it is not approved by a majority of voters, the Committee will establish a new proposed plan before the end of the following calendar year. The same procedures for establishing the plan will apply. If this constitutional amendment is rejected by voters it will be resubmitted at the general election or a special election held in 2036 and every ten years thereafter until it is approved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | ART VI.SEC 34 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/25/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/25/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
03/23/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
03/02/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Local Government
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HJR124 - Rep. Bennie Cook (R) - Proposes a constitutional amendment specifying the election, powers, and duties of a county sheriff | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on
Crime and Public Safety by a vote of 12 to 4 with 1 member voting
present.
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment would require each county to elect a sheriff for a term of four years in perpetuity. The amendment would also prohibit any method of removing a sheriff from office except by a writ of quo warranto initiated by the Attorney General. The provisions of this amendment would not apply to St. Louis City, St. Louis County, or St. Charles County. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this is a constitutional amendment that would require the removal of elected county sheriffs, other than charter counties, to be initiated by the Attorney General. The sheriffs remain accountable to the voters and they are still subject to removal through the proper channels. Sheriffs should not be appointed, selected, or chosen by the political lobby. They should be elected by and should answer to the people. That is how a constitutional republic should work. In times of crisis there should be no question about who is in charge. This protects sheriffs from political retaliation. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Cook; Kristine Bunch; Arnie Dienoff; and Michael Bonham. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | ART VII.SEC 15 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/11/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/11/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/10/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
03/09/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
03/04/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
02/26/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Crime and Public Safety
02/26/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Crime and Public Safety
02/24/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/26/2026, 9:00 AM - House-Crime and Public Safety, HR 3
02/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/24/2026, 4:00 PM - House-Crime and Public Safety, HR 6
02/17/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Crime and Public Safety
02/16/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/17/2026, 4:00 PM - House-Crime and Public Safety, HR 6
02/05/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Crime and Public Safety
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||