SB82 - Sen. Jamie Burger (R) - Creates provisions relating to water resources | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: | SS/SCS/SB 82 - The act creates provisions relating to water preservation in the state. Under the act, it shall be unlawful for any person to export water resources outside the state unless the person holds a water exportation permit issued by the Department of Natural Resources, subject to certain exemptions as described in the act. It shall be unlawful for any person to withdraw water for exportation by use of a pipeline facility, unless the withdrawal and ultimate end use of the water by a pipeline facility is within 30 miles of the state border. Any person who withdraws water for exportation shall annually report the water use volumes, withdrawal rates, and end use to the Department in a manner and on timelines determined by the Department. This provision has a severability clause. The Director of the Department shall review each water exportation permit application and all supporting documents to ensure the required conditions have been met prior to accepting a water exportation application for public comment and review by the State Soil and Water Districts Commission. The required conditions are described in the act. Within 120 days after receipt of a complete application, the Director shall determine whether the applicant complied with the conditions under the act. After making such a determination, the Director shall hold a 30-day public comment period regarding the determination. Within 60 days after the comment period, the Director shall recommend approval or denial of the permit. Such recommendation and public comments shall be submitted to the Commission. The Commission shall make the final decision as to the approval or denial of the permit as described in the act. To renew a water exportation permit, an applicant shall file a renewal application with the Department as described in the act. The process for reviewing the renewal application is described in the act. In the absence of an appeal, the decision of the Commission shall be final. A water exportation permit shall be in effect for three years after the date of issuance. The permit holder shall annually report the water use volumes, withdrawal rates, and end use to the Department. Such report shall be made available to the public on the Department's website. The water exportation permit application shall include all water exportation requested by the applicant. The water exportation permit may be approved by the Director or the Commission. An applicant may include multiple water withdrawals for exportation from various locations within one water exportation permit application. A water exportation permit application shall include a designee or agent in the state for service of process and to receive other notices. A major water user may request the Department to reevaluate any existing water exportation permit using the criteria under the act. The Department shall create a mechanism for a major water user to submit a request for reevaluation of the permit as described in the act. The act shall not preclude a person from bringing any claim to defend the person's water rights. A permit shall not serve as a defense to any claim brought against a water permit holder for the infringement of water rights. Any person harmed by the issuance of a permit may bring appropriate action as described in the act. If the Attorney General receives a complaint for violations of the act, or at the request of the Department, the Attorney General shall bring a civil action. Suit may be brought in any county where the defendant's principal place of business is located or where the withdrawal of water occurred in violation of the act. Any member of the Commission deemed to have violated provisions of this act shall forfeit their office upon such finding of a violation. Whenever a state of emergency is declared by the Governor in any part of the state based on drought conditions, the Department shall reevaluate any existing water exportation permit as described in the act. The act is similar to a provision in SCS/HCS/HBs 2134 & 1956 (2024), SCS/SB 782 (2024), SB 599 (2023) and HCS/HB 1129 (2023). JULIA SHEVELEVA |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citations: | 640.406 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Action: |
04/23/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bill History: |
04/23/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
04/22/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/23/2025, 12:30 PM - House-Conservation and Natural Resources, HR 6
03/31/2025
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
03/26/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/31/2025, 1:00 PM - House-Conservation and Natural Resources, HR 7
03/25/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
03/10/2025
H
- Read Second Time
03/06/2025
H
- Reported to the House and read first time
03/06/2025
S
- Third Read and Passed - Y-31 N-1
03/06/2025
S
- Laid out for consideration
03/06/2025
S
- Reported Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
03/05/2025
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
03/03/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/05/2025, 1:00 PM - Senate-Fiscal Oversight, Senate Lounge
02/27/2025
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Fiscal Oversight
02/26/2025
S
- Perfected
02/26/2025
S
- Floor Substitute Adopted
02/26/2025
S
- Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 1
02/26/2025
S
- Laid out for consideration
02/20/2025
S
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources
02/06/2025
S
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources
02/03/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/06/2025, 8:30 AM - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production and Outdoor Resources, SCR 1
01/30/2025
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources
01/27/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/30/2025, 8:30 AM - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production and Outdoor Resources, SCR 1
01/16/2025
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources
01/16/2025
S
- Read Second Time
01/08/2025
S
- Read First Time
12/02/2024
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HB200 - Rep. Bill Falkner (R) - Modifies provisions relating to environmental protection | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: | HB 200 -- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (Falkner) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Local Government This bill modifies several provisions relating to environmental protection. COUNTY SALES TAXES FOR PARK PURPOSES (Section 67.1754) This bill allows sales taxes collected by a county for the purpose of funding a metropolitan park or recreation district to be used by the county for storm water management projects that are confined to the deployment and augmentation of natural infrastructure or features that would otherwise add to the benefits of the park to the community. This provision is the same as HCS HB 1271. LATERAL SEWER SERVICE LINE REPAIR FEE (Section 249.422) Currently, upon voter approval, certain cities can, by ordinance, levy and impose annually, for the repair of lateral sewer service lines on or connecting residential property, a fee not to exceed $50 per year. This bill authorizes those cities to impose a fee not to exceed $100 per year for the repair of lateral sewer service lines. This provision is the same as HB 1306. RADIOACTIVE WASTE INVESTIGATION FUND (Section 260.558) Currently, the Department of Natural Resources must use the Radioactive Waste Investigation Fund to investigate concerns of waste exposure submitted by a local governing body. Under this bill, requests for investigations can be submitted in writing by any local governing body, community groups, or individual in the jurisdiction of an area of concern. The bill allows the Fund to accept gifts, bequests, and other devises of funds without limitation. This bill prevents the use of the fund for any costs related to clean up efforts. This bill specifies that the investigation can include collection of soil, dust, and water samples from the specified area. If the Department suspects that radioactive contaminants are on a property owned by a governmental agency that will not grant access for the investigation, the Department can seek a warrant to access the property. If the suspected contaminants are on private property, the Department must have the owner's permission to enter and test. Currently, there is a $150,000 cap on expenditures for investigation costs. This bill eliminates the cap and requires the Department to seek reimbursement from the Federal government for radioactive waste cleanup costs. These provisions are similar to HB 516. FEES COLLECTED BY EMERGENCY RESPONSE COMMISSION (Section 292.606) This bill extends the authority of the Missouri Emergency Response Commission to collect fees from August 28, 2024, to August 28, 2031. It authorizes a one-time fee to be assessed, which is to be calculated based on filings due March 1, 2025, and is to be paid by November 1, 2025. This provision is the same as HB 70. WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS (Section 393.2600) This bill prohibits a new "Wind Energy Conversion System", as defined in the bill, to begin commercial operations after August 28, 2025, unless that developer, owner, or operator applies to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for installation of a light- mitigating technology system. If the installation is approved by the FAA, the developer, owner, or operator of such wind energy conversion system must install the light-mitigating technology system on approved turbines within 24-months of receipt of approval. Before August 28, 2033, any developer, owner, or operator of a commercial wind energy conversion system without a light-mitigating technology system must apply to the FAA for installation and operation of a system. If the installation is approved by the FAA, the developer, owner, or operator must install the system on approved turbines within 24-months of approval. Any vendor selected for installation of a light-mitigating technology system must provide to the Department of Natural Resources notice of the progress of the installation of the system. If the installation is delayed beyond the 24-month requirement, the vendor must provide notice to the Department at least every three months, with an update on the reasons for the delay and current status of installation. Any costs associated with the installation, implementation, operation, and maintenance of the system must be the responsibility of the developer, owner, or operator of the wind energy conversion system. Any developer, owner, or operator that is approved to install a light-mitigating system but does not, is liable for a fine of $5,000 per day, per turbine, until the system is installed. These provisions are similar to HCS HB 1263 and 1124. SEWAGE DISPOSAL (Sections 701.040 and 701.046) Currently, a State standard for the location, size of sewage tanks, and length of lateral lines is based partially on the percolation or permeability rate of the soil, as well as other specified factors. This bill modifies this provision to state that the standard is based partially on soil properties. Currently, soil tests are to be performed by persons who are qualified to perform the percolation tests. This bill instead authorizes on-site soil evaluators registered by the Department of Health and Senior Services to conduct soil morphology evaluations. The bill repeals a provision allowing contractors to be taught and perform percolation tests. The bill creates a mandatory registration program requiring continuing education until January 1, 2026, for on-site wastewater treatment system professionals qualified to perform percolation tests in accordance with the state standard. The administrative authority can accept a percolation test at its own discretion until January 1, 2026, if a soil morphology evaluation cannot be reasonably obtained. Any person who intends to construct or make major modifications or repairs to an on-site sewage disposal system must submit an application fee and obtain a construction permit. This bill repeals the provision stating that the fee for on-site sewage modification and repair can be no greater than necessary to cover the cost to implement the state standard for on-site sewage disposal systems and the registration of contractors. Currently, the Department must establish the fee for on-site sewage disposal system modification and repair by rule at an amount no greater than $90 and can charge an additional fee as necessary to cover the expenses of training contractors to perform the percolation tests. The bill allows that the Department instead can promulgate regulations establishing the conditions and requirements for the construction permit application including the collection of reasonable fees set at a level to produce revenue not exceeding the cost and expense of administering the program. These provisions are the same as HB 200. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citations: | 249.422, 260.558, 292.606, 393.2600, 67.1754, 701.040, 701.046 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Action: |
04/22/2025
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bill History: |
04/22/2025
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
04/22/2025
H
- Third Read and Passed - Y-101 N-47
04/22/2025
H
- Laid out for consideration
04/22/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review
04/22/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review
04/17/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/22/2025, 1:15 PM - ** REVISED to ADD BILLS ** - House-Fiscal Review, HR 7
04/17/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review
04/16/2025
H
- Perfected
04/16/2025
H
- Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 5
04/16/2025
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/24/2025
H
- Removed from the Consent Calendar
03/05/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Consent and Procedure
03/04/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Consent and Procedure
03/03/2025
H
- ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/4/25 - 3:45 pm - HR 5 - House-Consent and Procedure
02/25/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2025, 3:45 PM - House-Consent and Procedure, HR 5
02/24/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Consent and Procedure
02/24/2025
H
- Recommended for House Consent Calendar
02/24/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Local Government
02/19/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Local Government
02/17/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/19/2025, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
02/11/2025
H
- Committee hearing cancelled - 2/12/25 - 8:00 am - HR 5 - House-Local Government
02/10/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/12/2025, 8:00 AM - ** CANCELLED ** - House - Local Government, HR 5
02/10/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing
02/05/2025
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
01/30/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/05/2025, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
01/28/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Local Government
01/09/2025
H
- Read Second Time
01/08/2025
H
- Read First Time
12/02/2024
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HB440 - Rep. Kent Haden (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to utilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Tax Reform by a vote of 9 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 440. Currently, where real property is used for more than one purposes resulting in different classifications, the county Assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money for the property devoted to each use. This bill specifies that any property classified as agricultural property that is used for the purpose of energy production activities for resale must be proportionally calculated, assessed, and reclassified as commercial property. Beginning January 1, 2026, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, or tangible personal property associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $2500 per megawatt of nameplate capacity. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property. This does not prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or certain abatement agreements, and it does not apply to agreements authorized under chapter 100. Beginning January 1, 2026, land associated with a solar energy project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity in excess of five megawatts must be classified as subclass (3) real property and assessed as commercial property. This bill also provides that, for certain public utility companies that have a solar energy project, the solar energy project must be assessed using a specific methodology. This does not apply to agreements authorized under chapter 100. The bill also provides that for real or tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy to generate electricity, including equipment used to support the integration of a solar generation asset into an existing system, must be valued and taxed by local authorities. This does not apply to certain photovoltaic energy systems or to agreements authorized under chapter 100. This bill provides that a county commission can choose to opt-in to the provision to that limits the total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in the county to 4% of all cropland in the county or less. Acres owned by utilities or electrical corporations must not be included in the 4% county calculation. The acreage is determined by the perimeter of the actual solar panels. County commissions choosing to adopt the 4% limit option must have procedures and a severability clause in those procedures. For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2026, the project will be subject to certain setbacks specified in the bill as measured from the nearest occupied dwelling, church, or school to the perimeter of the nearest solar panel. This setback must not apply to an official agreement between the project and the property owner. This setback does not apply to solar energy projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2025, or to agreements authorized under chapter 100. A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project. This bill is similar to HCS HB 2651 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill attempts to negotiate with solar bills and solar energy, and it addressed how solar facilities are taxed. Supporters also say the bill will provide for fairness in how land used for certain solar energy projects will be appropriately assessed as commercial rather than agricultural. Supporters say the bill allows for more consistency because, currently, solar energy companies are not paying their fair tax load. Supporters also say the energy generating sources will be assessed at a local level. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Haden; Leslie Meyer, Audrain County; Gary Jungermann; Kenneth Twillman, Twillman Feed Service LLC; John Burns; Arnie Dienoff; Missouri Farm Bureau; Andy Ekton; Greg Westhusing; Charles Greg Crawford. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the bill conflicts with legislation regarding setbacks. The large setbacks in the bill will lead to more land being pulled from other acres that are meant for food production. Opponents also state that investments have already been made in these projects, so there will need to be some transition period or grandfather condition before needing to make material modifications. Testifying in person against the bill were Arevon Energy; Ameren Missouri; Susan Burns; David Bunge, Azimuth Renewables, LLC; Clean Grid Alliance; Missouri Solar Energy Industries Association (MOSEIA). Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citations: | 137.016, 137.124, 153.030, 153.034, 393.1120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Action: |
04/17/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bill History: |
04/17/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
04/17/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
04/16/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/17/2025, 9:15 AM - ** REVISED to REMOVE HB 1049 ** - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
04/07/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
04/02/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Legislative Review
04/01/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Legislative Review
03/31/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/01/2025, 4:30 PM - House-Legislative Review, HR 7
03/27/2025
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Legislative Review
03/25/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/27/2025, 8:00 AM - House-Legislative Review, HR 5
03/11/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Legislative Review
03/06/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform
03/04/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform
03/03/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2025, 12:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform, HR 1
02/25/2025
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform
02/24/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/25/2025, 12:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform, HR 1
02/20/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform
01/09/2025
H
- Read Second Time
01/08/2025
H
- Read First Time
12/09/2024
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HB475 - Rep. Brad Pollitt (R) - Modifies provisions for eminent domain for utility purposes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Rural Issues by a vote of 10 to 4. This bill prohibits the use of eminent domain by electrical corporations for the construction or erection of any plant, tower, panel, or facility that: (1) Uses, captures, or converts wind or air currents to generate or manufacture electricity; or (2) Uses, captures, or converts the light or heat generated by the sun to generate or manufacture electricity. The bill specifies that the authority of any corporation to condemn property extends to the acquisition of rights needed for collection, distribution, and transmission lines and to other facilities needed to collect and deliver energy generated or manufactured by solar or wind facilities. This bill is the same as HB 1750 (2024) and HB 1052(2023). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that eminent domain proceedings should be a last resort for any utility and that wind and solar companies should negotiate fair prices with landowners. Currently wind and solar facilities are considered an electrical corporation and can petition the Public Service Commission for recognition as such, which would grant them the power of eminent domain. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Pollitt; Missouri Corn Growers Association; Missouri Soybean Association; and Missouri Farm Bureau. OPPONENTS: No opposition was voiced to the Committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say Ameren Missouri has no intentions of using condemnation proceedings to build wind or solar facilities. However, the regional transmission operator or other grid operator has requirements for grid connections and condemnation proceedings may be used for transmission lines and interconnects, but only as a last resort. Testifying in person on the bill was Ameren. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citations: | 523.010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Action: |
04/16/2025
H
- Placed on Informal Calendar
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bill History: |
04/16/2025
H
- Placed on Informal Calendar
03/13/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
03/11/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
03/10/2025
H
- ** REVISED for TIME CHANGE ** - 3/10/25 - 5:15 or Upon Adjournment of House-Rules-Legislative - HR 4 - House-Rules-Administrative
03/10/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/11/2025, 5:15 PM - House-Rules-Administrative, HR 4
03/05/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
02/20/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues
02/19/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues
02/17/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/19/2025, 4:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues, HR 5
02/12/2025
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues
02/10/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/12/2025, 8:00 AM - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues, HR 6
01/22/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues
01/09/2025
H
- Read Second Time
01/08/2025
H
- Read First Time
12/10/2024
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
HB1295 - Rep. Cameron Parker (R) - Creates provisions relating to water exportation outside the state | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Agriculture by a vote of 16 to 3. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1295. This bill prohibits any person from exporting water resources outside the State unless the person holds a water exportation permit issued by the Department of Natural Resources, subject to certain specified exemptions. The Director of the Department must review each water exportation permit application and all supporting documents to ensure the required conditions have been met prior to accepting a water exportation application for public comment and review by the State Soil and Water Districts Commission. In the event of a conflict between water uses outside the State and the needs of the State, the Director and the Commission must prioritize the needs of the State. Within 180 days after receipt of a complete application, the Director must determine whether the applicant complied with the requirements for a permit. After making such a determination, the Director must hold a 30-day public comment period regarding the determination. Within 60 days after the comment period, the Director must recommend approval or denial of the permit and submit the recommendation and public comments to the Commission. The Commission must make the final decision as to the approval or denial of the permit, as specified in the bill. To renew a water exportation permit, an applicant must file a renewal application with the Department, as required in the bill. The process for reviewing the renewal application is described in the bill. In the absence of an appeal, the decision of the Commission must be final. The permit is in effect for three years from issuance and the permit holder will annually report the water use volumes and withdrawal rates to the Department. The water exportation permit application must include all water exportation requested by the applicant. An applicant can include multiple water withdrawals for export from various locations within one water exportation permit application. A major water user can request the Department to reevaluate any existing water exportation permit using the criteria specified in the bill. The Department must create a mechanism for a major water user to submit a request for reevaluation of the permit. A person is not precluded from bringing any claim to defend the person's water rights. A permit will not serve as a defense to any claim brought against a water permit holder for the infringement of water rights. In addition, any person harmed by the issuance of a permit may bring action to enforce the provisions of the bill. If the Attorney General receives a complaint for violations of the provisions of the bill, or at the request of the Department, the Attorney General can bring a civil action. A suit can be brought in Cole County or any county where the defendant's principal place of business is located or where the withdrawal of water occurred. Whenever a state of emergency is declared by the Governor in any part of the State based on drought conditions, the Department must reevaluate any existing water exportation permit. This bill is similar to SB 29 (2025) and SB 82 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that unlike many other states, Missouri has an abundance of water and the state needs to protect the water supply for Missouri residents and businesses. Recently, the Kansas Governor has mentioned using the water in Missouri to meet Kansas's needs. This bill is a proactive measure to ensure that the water supply is protected from out-of-state parties. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Parker; Missouri Cattlemen?S Association; Arnie C. Dienoff; Mo-Ag; The Nature Conservancy; Missouri Farm Bureau; Missouri American Water; Missouri Corn Growers Association; City of Kansas City; and Missouri Soybean Association. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill is preempting riparian water rights by placing bureaucracy between the landowner and the use of the water. Testifying in person against the bill was Ike Skelton, Camden County, Mo. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citations: | 640.406 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Last Action: |
04/10/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bill History: |
04/10/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
04/08/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/10/2025, 9:30 AM - ** REVISED to ADD HB 845 ** - House-Rules-Administrative, HR 4
03/27/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
03/05/2025
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Agriculture
03/04/2025
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Agriculture
02/27/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2025, 8:00 AM - House-Agriculture, HR 7
02/25/2025
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Agriculture
02/20/2025
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/25/2025, 8:00 AM - House-Agriculture, HR 7
02/19/2025
H
- Referred to committee - House-Agriculture
02/17/2025
H
- Read Second Time
02/13/2025
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|