| HB2085 - Rep. Ben Keathley (R) - Modifies provisions relating to tobacco product regulations | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | HCS HB 2085 -- TOBACCO PRODUCTS (Keathley) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 407.932 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | Senate: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
04/01/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
04/01/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws
03/31/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/01/2026, 11:00 AM - Senate-General Laws, SCR 2
03/12/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws
03/12/2026
S
- Read Second Time
03/02/2026
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
02/26/2026
H
- Third Read and Passed - Y-93 N-43
02/26/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
02/24/2026
H
- Perfected
02/24/2026
H
- Committee substitute adopted
02/24/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
02/10/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
02/10/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative
02/04/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/10/2026, 9:30 AM - House-Rules-Administrative, HR 4
01/29/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
01/22/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Commerce
01/21/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Commerce
01/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/21/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 6
01/14/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Commerce
01/14/2026
H
- ** IN RECESS until 10:15 AM - Location Change ** - 1/14/26 -10:15 am - HR 7 - House-Commerce
01/14/2026
H
- ** IN RECESS until 10:15 AM - Location Change ** - 1/14/26 - 10:15 am - HR 1 - House-Commerce
01/13/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/14/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 7
01/08/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Commerce
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2774 - Rep. Jeff Knight (R) - Prohibits regulations on the sale or use of certain vehicles, tools, and equipment based on their fuel source | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | HCS HB 2774 -- REGULATIONS BASED ON FUEL SOURCES (Knight) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 1.2060 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | Senate: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Transportation, Infrastructure, and Public Safety
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Transportation, Infrastructure, and Public Safety
03/26/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/30/2026, 2:45 PM - Senate-Transportation, Infrastructure and Public Safety, SCR 1
03/23/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Transportation, Infrastructure, and Public Safety
03/23/2026
S
- Read Second Time
03/11/2026
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
03/11/2026
H
- Third Read and Passed - Y-130 N-5
03/11/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/09/2026
H
- Perfected
03/09/2026
H
- Committee substitute adopted
03/09/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
02/26/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
02/26/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
02/25/2026
H
- ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 2/26/26 - 9:40 am - HR 3 - House-Rules-Legislative
02/25/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/26/2026, 9:40 AM - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 3
02/23/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
02/19/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-General Laws
02/18/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-General Laws
02/17/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/18/2026, 4:00 PM - House-General Laws, HR 7
02/11/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-General Laws
02/10/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/11/2026, 4:00 PM - House-General Laws, HR 7
02/04/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-General Laws
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SB914 - Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R) - Modifies provisions relating to sewage regulation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SS/SB 914 - This act modifies provisions relating to sewage regulation. The act repeals a provision stating that a state standard for the location, size of sewage tanks and length of lateral lines is based on the percolation or permeability rate of the soil. Under the act, the state standard is based on soil properties. The act repeals a provision stating that soil tests are to be performed by persons who are qualified to perform the percolation tests and creates a new provision authorizing on-site soil evaluators registered by the Department of Health and Senior Services to conduct soils morphology evaluations. This act repeals a provision stating that contractors may be taught and allowed to perform percolation tests. The act repeals a provision relating to the Department of Health and Senior Services periodically reviewing any county and city regulation and enforcement record to ensure that the state standard for sewage regulation is being enforced. The act creates a mandatory registration program requiring continuing education before January 1, 2027, for on-site wastewater treatment system professionals qualified to perform percolation tests in accordance with the state standard as described in the act. Before January 1, 2027, the administrative authority may accept a percolation test at its own discretion if a soil morphology evaluation cannot be reasonably obtained. This provision shall be void and of no effect after December 31, 2026. Under the act, any person who intends to construct or make major modifications or repairs to an on-site sewage disposal system must submit an application fee and obtain a construction permit. The act repeals certain provisions relating to fees for repair of on-site sewage disposal systems. Under the act, the Department shall promulgate regulations establishing the conditions and requirements for the construction permit application, including the collection of reasonable fees set at a level to produce revenue not exceeding the cost and expense of administering the provisions under the act. The act is substantially similar to SB 601 (2025), a provision in the perfected HB 200 (2025), a provision in HCS/SS/SB 61 (2025), HB 2083 (2024), HB 814 (2023), and substantially similar to SB 1283 (2024), and SB 523 (2023). JULIA SHEVELEVA
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 701.040, 701.046 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/26/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Local Government
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/26/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Local Government
03/25/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Local Government
03/23/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
03/11/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
03/09/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/11/2026, 8:00 AM - House - Local Government, HR 5
02/27/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Local Government
02/16/2026
H
- Read Second Time
02/12/2026
H
- Reported to the House and read first time
02/12/2026
S
- Third Read and Passed - Y-29 N-1
02/12/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
02/10/2026
S
- Perfected
02/10/2026
S
- Floor Substitute Adopted
02/10/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
02/05/2026
S
- Reported Do Pass - Senate-Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy, and the Environment
02/03/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy, and the Environment
01/28/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy, and the Environment
01/26/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/28/2026, 2:00 PM - ** RESCHEDULED ** - Senate-Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy and the Environment, SCR 2
01/08/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Commerce, Consumer Protection, Energy, and the Environment
01/08/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
S
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SB975 - Sen. Rusty Black (R) - Modifies provisions relating to ambulance districts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SS/SB 975 - AMBULANCE DISTRICT BOARD MEMBERSHIP Current law requires county commissions to divide newly formed ambulance districts into six election districts for the election of members of the board of directors. This act makes the election for all such directors at-large, and allows ambulance districts the option of dividing into six election districts. (Section 190.050) Current law authorizes six-member ambulance districts to adopt a resolution increasing the board to seven members. This act requires that any such resolution shall state the names of the existing directors as well as any vacancies to be filled in a subsequent election. If a six-member ambulance district votes to decrease the number of directors to five or three, all existing board members shall complete their terms. (Section 190.051) Current law requires the county commission to fill vacancies on an ambulance board if the board is unable to fill such vacancies on its own within sixty days or if there are more than two vacancies at a time, with such appointment made by the county commission within ten days. This act modifies such provision by requiring a written request from the ambulance board or the ambulance service administrator prior to the county commission filling a vacancy, and by increasing the deadline to fill such vacancy from ten days to thirty calendar days. (Section 190.052) DISTRICT ANNEXATION OF LAND Current law requires a petition for the annexation of land into an ambulance district to be filed with the county clerk, with the county commission ordering an election if such petition complies with state law. This act moves such responsibilities to the ambulance district board of directors. (Section 190.070) AMBULANCE DISTRICT CONSOLIDATION This act requires every petition or resolution for the consolidation of two or more ambulance districts to be accompanied by a consolidation plan, which shall include information described in the act. Petitions and resolutions for consolidation shall be received from all consolidating ambulance districts within the same calendar year or shall be considered null and void. Notice of intent is required to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in every county in which the proposed consolidated district will be located, and a joint public hearing shall be held no more than ten days after the date of the second publication of the notice of intent. If no objections are filed within thirty days after the public hearing, the county commission shall order the districts consolidated. If a qualified objection is made, the county commission shall order the submission of the question of consolidation to the voters. A consolidated ambulance district may impose a tax levy not to exceed the highest tax levy imposed among the consolidating districts, provided that such rate is approved by the voters. No tax rate greater than the lowest rate imposed by the consolidating districts shall be imposed without a vote of the district voters. Any ambulance district that has contracted for ambulance service with another ambulance district for more than five consecutive years may consolidate into such district without providing notice or a public hearing. (Section 190.090) TRISTAN BENSON JR |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 190.050, 190.051, 190.052, 190.070, 190.090, 190.098, 190.165, 590.192 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
04/01/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Local Government
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
04/01/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Local Government
03/30/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/01/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
03/25/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
03/23/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
03/12/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Local Government
03/09/2026
H
- Read Second Time
03/05/2026
H
- Reported to the House and read first time
03/05/2026
S
- Third Read and Passed - Y-30 N-0
03/05/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
02/24/2026
S
- Perfected
02/24/2026
S
- Floor Substitute Adopted
02/24/2026
S
- Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 2
02/24/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
02/12/2026
S
- Reported Do Pass - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
02/09/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
01/29/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
01/25/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/29/2026, 8:00 AM - Senate-Local Government, Elections and Pensions, SCR 1
01/21/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/26/2026, 2:00 PM - Senate-Local Government, Elections and Pensions, Senate Lounge
01/08/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
01/08/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
S
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SB1189 - Sen. Jill Carter (R) - Modifies provisions relating to juvenile detention centers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SB 1189 - Currently, circuit judges of a judicial circuit may establish a place of juvenile detention for the counties within the circuit court. This act provides that a county commission or governing body of a county may provide for juvenile detention in coordination with all other counties within the same circuit court or with all counties of the same circuit court and all counties of an adjoining circuit court. The county commission or governing body shall approve an ordinance, order, or resolution authorizing a place of detention, shall approve an agreement as specified in this act between the counties, and shall notify the presiding circuit judge. The operation and support of a juvenile detention facility authorized pursuant to this act shall be regulated in accordance with the rules and standards of the Supreme Court of Missouri under the governance of the circuit judge. If two or more counties of adjoining judicial circuits have authorized a place of detention, the circuit judges shall jointly govern the affairs of the place of detention. Furthermore, the counties authorizing a place of detention pursuant to this section may impose, by order, a sales tax up to one percent on all retail sales. This act is identical to SB 809 (2025). TRISTAN BENSON, JR. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 211.331, 211.341, 211.342 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/04/2026
S
- Not heard in committee - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/04/2026
S
- Not heard in committee - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
03/02/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2026, 8:00 AM - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence, Senate Lounge
01/27/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence
01/27/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
S
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SB1286 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to local permitting applications | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SB 1286 - This act provides that a political subdivision shall approve or deny a request for a permit or any other kind of prior approval required for the construction of new residential, commercial, or industrial buildings within thirty calendar days of the request. If a response is not received by the applicant within thirty days, the request shall be deemed approved. If the request is approved, the political subdivision shall not impose any additional requirements related to such request. If the request is denied, the political subdivision shall state the reasons for denial, as described in the act. This act is identical to HCS/HB 1264 (2025). TRISTAN BENSON, JR. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 67.486 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
03/09/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
03/06/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/09/2026, 2:00 PM - Senate-Local Government, Elections and Pensions, Senate Lounge
01/27/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
01/27/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
S
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SB1344 - Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R) - Authorizes the creation of a boundary commission in Jefferson County | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SB 1344 - Current law authorizes Saint Louis County to create a boundary commission. This act authorizes Jefferson County to create a boundary commission. TRISTAN BENSON, JR. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 72.401, 72.420 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
03/09/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
03/06/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/09/2026, 2:00 PM - Senate-Local Government, Elections and Pensions, Senate Lounge
01/27/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions
01/27/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
S
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
S
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SB1586 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to solid waste management | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | SCS/SB 1586 - The act modifies certain provisions relating to solid waste management.
Under the act, no person may transfer title to any property containing a solid waste disposal site or demolition landfill without disclosing the sale, conveyance, or transfer to the Department of Natural Resources. The seller shall inform the buyer with a written notice signed and dated by the seller about the existence and location of the disposal or landfill site. If the seller fails to send the written notice to the buyer, the buyer may cancel the sale and the seller shall return to the buyer any earnest money paid by the buyer to the seller.
The act provides that any person or entity that applies for a grant shall not be disqualified from receiving such grant on the basis that there is a familial relationship between the applicant and any member of the Department, instead of the solid management district executive board as currently provided.
After October 1, 2027, an annual adjustment of fees collected for solid waste accepted shall be based on the percentage increase measured by the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the preceding year.
The Department shall have the authority to assess, investigate, test, remediate, and manage abandoned solid waste disposal areas.
The Department shall allocate a percentage of revenue dedicated to grants previously managed by solid waste management districts. This percentage shall serve as a minimum percentage of revenue to fund such grants and shall be calculated as follows: the total grant amount previously administered by solid waste management districts for the previous three fiscal years divided by the total amount of solid waste tonnage fees from the previous three fiscal years. Such percentage of revenue shall be divided as follows: 40% shall be allocated based on the population within the geographical area of each regional office of the Department in the latest decennial census, and 60% shall be allocated based on the amount of revenue generated within each geographical area of each regional office of the Department. Revenue generated within each geographical area of each regional office of the Department shall be determined from the previous year's data. Moneys shall be awarded based upon grant applications.
The act repeals certain provisions relating to the distribution of the revenues.
Grants for proposals that will promote and maximize the sharing of district resources shall no longer be part of the criteria to establish the order of grant authority.
Any allocated moneys remaining in any fiscal year due to insufficient or inadequate grant applications shall be reallocated for grant applications in subsequent years or for Department operations, instead of solid waste management projects as provided in current law.
All remaining revenues not included in the calculation relating to the maintenance of essential grants, instead of 39% of the revenues as currently provided, shall be dedicated, upon appropriation, to the elimination of illegal solid waste disposal.
The act repeals certain provisions relating to any allocated district moneys remaining after five years. The act repeals a provision relating to sample audits of grants. The act repeals a provision relating to the criteria for allocation of grant moneys.
The act provides that the Department shall promulgate criteria for evaluating grants by rule and regulation.
The act further repeals certain provisions relating to funds awarded to solid waste management districts and grants approved by the solid waste management districts.
The act provides that the state solid waste management districts shall be dissolved effective August 28, 2026. By December 31, 2026, each solid waste management district shall: submit a final financial audit, remit any leftover moneys to the Solid Waste Management Fund, provide a list of open grants, and provide a complete itemized list of all grants awarded for the previous three fiscal years.
Effective August 28, 2026, the Department shall take over the oversight of open district grants.
The act repeals certain provisions relating to solid waste management regions, a Solid Waste Management Council, executive boards of solid waste management districts, and the Solid Waste Advisory Board. JULIA SHEVELEVA |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 260.213, 260.300, 260.302, 260.305, 260.310, 260.315, 260.320, 260.324, 260.325, 260.330, 260.335, 260.345, 260.336 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/24/2026
S
- Placed on Informal Calendar
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/24/2026
S
- Placed on Informal Calendar
03/24/2026
S
- Laid out for consideration
03/09/2026
S
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources
03/05/2026
S
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources
02/19/2026
S
- Hearing Conducted - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources
02/17/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/19/2026, 8:45 AM - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production and Outdoor Resources, SCR 1
02/05/2026
S
- Referred to committee - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources
02/05/2026
S
- Read Second Time
01/22/2026
S
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB1825 - Rep. Danny Busick (R) - Removes the prosecuting attorney and the sheriff from the county salary commission | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | HB 1825 -- COUNTY SALARY COMMISSIONS (Busick) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 50.333 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: 3rd Reading | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
S
- Reported to the Senate and read first time
03/30/2026
H
- Third Read and Passed - Y-152 N-0
03/30/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/25/2026
H
- Perfected
03/25/2026
H
- Floor Amendment(s) Adopted - 1
03/25/2026
H
- Laid out for consideration
03/23/2026
H
- Placed on Informal Calendar
02/17/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
02/16/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative
02/12/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/16/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4
02/02/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Local Government
01/28/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Local Government
01/23/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/28/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
01/21/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Local Government
01/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/21/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5
01/08/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Local Government
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB1699 - Rep. Mazzie Christensen (R) - Modifies provisions relating to county health officers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill specifies that in instances in which a county health officer is not reappointed, or in the event a vacancy is created, the county commission may appoint an interim county health officer until the vacancy is filled. This bill is the same as HB 460 (2025). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 192.260, 205.100 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/01/2026, 4:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues, HR 5
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/01/2026, 4:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues, HR 5
03/09/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB1743 - Rep. Scott Miller (R) - Modifies provisions governing the seizure of property for tax delinquencies | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill prohibits the seizure of certain property solely because the owner owes taxes on the property. The bill applies to only personal property that belongs to an individual or to certain limited liability companies (LLC), and to real property classified as residential and used as the owner's primary residence, including when the real property is held in the name of a LLC and is used for farming purposes. This bill is the same as HCS HB 1212 (2025). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 139.120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/10/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/10/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means
03/05/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - ** REVISED to ADD HB 3405 ** - House-Ways and Means, HR 1
02/05/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Ways and Means
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/01/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2288 - Rep. Brad Pollitt (R) - Modifies setback distances for certain areas in regards to solid waste disposal | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on
Intergovernmental Affairs by a vote of 10 to 5.
This bill authorizes any county to adopt an ordinance, rule, regulation, or standard relating to solid waste management in the county as specified in the bill. Any setback applicable to a solid waste disposal area may not be more stringent than: (1) Three miles from defined incorporated limits of a city, town, or village within the county; an accredited school or certain property owned and operated by school districts or educational institutions; a church or place of worship; a platted subdivision; or public areas designated for recreational activity; (2) Three-quarters of a mile from any occupied dwelling used for residential purposes for at least six months a year; and (3) Two hundred feet from the property line of the solid waste disposal area. This bill is similar to HB 372 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the Pettis County landfill took in 618,000 tons of waste last year, while the county only produced 22,000. There is a massive importing of trash, and Pettis doesn?t want to be the trash capitol of the region. This bill allows local governments to make setbacks to protect the health of their land and communities. Rural Missouri is used as the solution to urban Missouri?s problems. Local governments that wish to can determine less stringent guidelines. Thousands signed the petition to stop the landfill, and it is good to be a net exporter of waste. Trash blows out of trucks when shipping trash into Pettis County, and the county has to clean it up. Statutes allow local regulation already. Failing to place clear guidance in statute forces courts to make determinations they aren?t well-equipped to make, and local governments are placed in conflict with the Department of Natural Resources. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Pollitt; Arnie Dienoff; Israel Baeza, County of Pettis; and Bill Taylor. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that Missouri has become one of the largest waste exporters in the country, exporting 1/3 of all waste. Landfills have been failing to gain authorization in Missouri. The facilities are painstakingly located, and the upcoming landfill is set to be one of the most remote facilities in the State. This will eliminate the ability of new landfills to be sited or expanded. These plans are a critical component of economic development and public health. Opponents further state permitting landfills is no walk in the park now. The average permit time is 7-9 years, and 90% of facilities are rejected. These sites prevent illegal dumping and poisoned groundwater. Without the ability to dispose of waste, Missouri will also struggle to attract heavy industry as it comes back to the United States. It is more expensive and environmentally damaging to not handle this issue ourselves. Testifying in person against the bill were Derrick Standley, Presidio Environmental; and Trail Consulting. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 260.217 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/05/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/05/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
03/04/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
03/04/2026
H
- Motion to Reconsider - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
03/02/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2026, 4:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs, HR 1
02/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/23/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs, HR 6
02/16/2026
H
- Voted Do Not Pass - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
02/12/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/16/2026, 4:30 PM - ** REVISED to REMOVE HB 3279** - House - Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs, HR 6
02/02/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
01/29/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/02/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs, HR 6
01/25/2026
H
- Committee hearing cancelled - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm - HR 6 - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
01/22/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 01/26/2026, 4:30 PM - ** CANCELLED ** - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs, HR 6
01/08/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/09/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2330 - Rep. Richard West (R) - Modifies provisions relating to annexation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing
Committee on Government Efficiency by a vote of 14 to 2, with 3
voting present.
The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2330. Current law provides that a city, town, or village can annex an unincorporated area that is contiguous and compact to its existing corporate limits. This bill specifies that the term "contiguous and compact" includes a situation whereby at least 25% of the length of the perimeter of the unincorporated area is contiguous with the annexing city, town, or village. Currently, the bill applies to St Charles and Jefferson Counties. The bill prohibits a city, town, or village from annexing an unincorporated area contiguous to another unincorporated area annexed by the same city, town, or village within the last 24 months. Current law provides that a public hearing must be conducted in order to inform residents of the area to be annexed about certain information, including a list of major services presently provided by the annexing city, town, or village. This bill repeals water and sewer systems from this list. Current law provides an additional annexation procedure for cities in certain counties using a petition process rather than a vote of the residents of the annexed area. This bill repeals this annexation procedure. This bill is similar to HB 631 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will remove the possibility of cities being annexed into large, unincorporated areas. Cities typically have higher density permission use for those portions of the city that might be annexed. Supporters further state that current infrastructure of political subdivisions is not designed for an influx of people, which inevitably leads to more traffic and over-development. School districts, water, sewer, and other utilities cannot keep up with some of the annexations that are occurring across the state. Supporters also say that the 24-month restriction protects against rapid, successive annexations, which also overburden infrastructure. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative West; and St. Charles County. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this particular issue of annexation was dealt with primarily in the 1990s, and those adjustments are still adequate. There are currently protections in place to prevent overburdening cities, towns, and villages, which makes this bill unnecessary. Opponents further state that most of the growth that occurs in cities is from "voluntary annexation", in which individuals or businesses choose the city as the principal residence, but that process is usually handled by local zoning restrictions and local ballot measures. Testifying in person against the bill was Missouri Municipal League. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 71.012, 71.014, 71.015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/09/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Government Efficiency
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/09/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Government Efficiency
03/05/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Government Efficiency
03/05/2026
H
- Reconsidered - House-Government Efficiency
03/02/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/05/2026, 8:00 AM - ** REVISED to ADD HB 2330 ** - House-Government Efficiency, HR 7
02/26/2026
H
- Voted Do Not Pass as substituted - House-Government Efficiency
02/24/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/26/2026, 8:00 AM - ** REVISED to ADD HB 1817 ** - House-Government Efficiency, HR 7
02/05/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Government Efficiency
02/03/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/05/2026, 9:00 AM - House-Government Efficiency, HR 7
01/08/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Government Efficiency
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/10/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2474 - Rep. John Voss (R) - Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing
Committee on Economic Development by a vote of 15 to 0.
The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2474. This bill adds "progressive design-build contracts", as defined in the bill, to numerous provisions of law related to design- build contracts. Currently, a design criteria consultant must be employed by a political subdivision to perform certain tasks related to design- build projects. This bill allows a design criteria consultant to be employed by a political subdivision, but does not require it. The bill outlines the necessary elements of a request for proposal for a progressive design-build contract. Political subdivisions are required to solicit proposals in a two -stage process. Phase I is the solicitation and evaluation of the qualifications of design-builders. Phase II is the solicitation and evaluation of proposals describing the design- builder's approach to design development, preconstruction services, and construction of the project. Various criteria that the political subdivision must consider during each phase are described in the bill. The political subdivision has the discretion to disqualify any design-builder that the political subdivision finds lacks the minimum qualifications required to perform the work. The political subdivision will use criteria described in the bill to select no more than three but no less than two qualified design-builders, who will be given a specified amount of time to assemble phase II proposals. Evaluation of phase II proposals must be qualifications-based. Price considerations are for the preconstruction phase services only. The political subdivision will rank the phase II proposals according to criteria described in the bill. Following the evaluation, the political subdivision can enter into negotiations with the highest-ranked design-builder to establish a preconstruction agreement. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the political subdivision can begin negotiations with the next highest-ranked design-builder. During the preconstruction phase, the design-builder and the political subdivision will collaborate to establish a fixed contract amount or a guaranteed maximum price. Upon acceptance of the price and contract terms, the parties may amend the contract to authorize construction. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will allow Missouri to be more competitive with other states like Kansas that have similar progressive design-build contracts. Some say that this bill will help bring more economic development to Missouri. This bill will lead to cost savings for taxpayers, as this is a smoother process for local municipalities to enter and leave contracts based on work being completed, or at their own discretion, if needed, in the early stages of the contract. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Voss; Doug Wesselschmidt, City of Grandview; Joe Perry; American Council of Engineering Companies of Missouri; Design-Build Institute of America-Midwest; Missouri Municipal League; Lynne Schlosser, Missouri Public Utility Alliance; Burns & McDonnell; Greater KC Chamber of Commerce; The Builders? Association/KC Chapter, AGC. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 67.5060 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/25/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/25/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative
03/03/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Economic Development
03/03/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Economic Development
02/25/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/03/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Economic Development, HR 1
02/24/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Economic Development
02/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/24/2026, 8:00 AM - ** REVISED to REMOVE HB 1915 ** - House - Economic Development, HR 1
02/12/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Economic Development
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
12/17/2025
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB2753 - Rep. Christopher Warwick (R) - Allows counties and municipalities to establish "hospital zone'' and provides for the enhancement of penalties when driving offenses occur within such zones | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing
Committee on Corrections and Public Institutions by a vote of 10
to 2 with 1 member voting present.
The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2753. This bill authorizes counties and municipalities to establish hospital zones for streets surrounding a hospital as areas where hospital activities are occurring. If a county or municipality determines the boundaries for a hospital speed zone and erects signs reading "Hospital Zone - Fines Doubled", the court may double the amount of a fine for a traffic violation in the hospital zone. The maximum speed limit in a hospital zone is 30 miles per hour. The bill creates the offenses of "endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital zone" and "aggravated endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital zone. A person commits endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital zone if the person commits one of the following in a hospital speed zone, except in cases of mechanical failure or negligence by a pedestrian: (1) Exceeding the posted speed limit by 15 miles per hour or more; (2) Leaving the scene of an accident; (3) Careless and imprudent driving; (4) Operating without a valid license; (5) Operating with a suspended or revoked license (6) Driving while intoxicated; or (7) Any felony involving the use of a motor vehicle. A person who commits endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital speed zone will have four points assessed to their license and be subject to a fine of up to $500. Aggravated endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital speed zone occurs when a pedestrian is injured or killed, and a person committing this offense will have 12 points assessed to their driver's license, and their license will be revoked. If a pedestrian is injured, the person will be subject to a fine of not more than $5,000. If a pedestrian is killed, the person will be subject to a fine of not more than $10,000. The bill requires the Department of Revenue to revoke the license of any driver who negligently strikes a pedestrian in a hospital speed zone where proper signage has been posted. The Department will make its determination based on the report of a law enforcement officer investigating the incident, and that determination will be final, unless a hearing is requested and held on the matter. A driver can petition for a hearing before a circuit division or associate division of the court in which the hospital zone accident occurred. In the petition, a driver can request a court stay the revocation of their license until the petition can be heard, and the court can grant the stay at its discretion, pending a hearing. If the court grants the stay, it will enter the order on a form prescribed by the Director of Revenue and send a copy to the Director. The Director will keep the driver's license of the driver, and the driver will have the ability to drive, using the order from the court staying the suspension as their proof of privilege to operate a motor vehicle. At the hearing, the prosecuting attorney of the county will appear on behalf of the Department, and the court will determine only: (1) Whether the person was involved in a physical accident where his or her vehicle struck a pedestrian within a designated hospital zone; (2) Whether guidelines involving notice and signage were properly implemented in such hospital zone; and (3) Whether the investigating officer had probable cause to believe the person's negligent acts or omissions contributed to his or her vehicle striking a pedestrian. If the court determines any of the answers to these three determinations is in the negative, the court must order the Director to reinstate the license or permit to drive. Otherwise, and if the driver does not request or is not granted a hearing, the driver's license or permit will be reinstated upon taking and passing the written and driving portions of the driver's license examination. This administrative adjudication to reinstate a license revoked by this bill, any evidence provided to the Department, the court's determinations, and the evidence provided to the court relating to such determinations will all be unavailable by subpoena or any other means and made available in other administrative actions, civil cases, or criminal prosecutions. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that hospital zones will function similarly to work safety zones and school zones. Hospitals have irregular, high-volume foot traffic due to staff shift changes and patient arrivals, and local governments need a tool to address issues they recognize in their community. There?s a rural area with a $100 million dollar expansion in their hospital, and they?re asking for help with traffic control on the highway. Increases in services and patient activity mean drivers crest the hill near the hospital going well over 40 mph and often end up in dangerous situations. They?ve had a few near misses already. Lowering the speed limit is an effective way to prevent traffic accidents, but counties and municipalities can struggle to reduce speed limits on highways in their jurisdiction. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Warwick; Arnie Dienoff; Mosaic Life Care; Missouri Hospital Association; and Steve Retherford, Citizens Memorial Hospital. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 302.302, 304.1020, 304.1023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/03/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/03/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Rules-Legislative
02/27/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Corrections and Public Institutions
02/26/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Corrections and Public Institutions
02/24/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/26/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Corrections and Public Institutions, HR 5
02/23/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Corrections and Public Institutions
02/19/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/23/2026, 12:00 PM - House-Corrections and Public Institutions, HR 5
02/19/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Corrections and Public Institutions
01/08/2026
H
- Read Second Time
01/07/2026
H
- Read First Time
01/06/2026
H
- Pre-Filed
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB3230 - Rep. Bill Hardwick (R) - Creates new provisions for zoning regulations for manufactured housing | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on
Commerce by a vote of 8 to 0.
This bill prohibits a local government from adopting or enforcing a zoning ordinance or land use regulation that bans manufactured homes where other single-family housing is permitted, imposes requirements on manufactured homes that are more restrictive than other on-site build homes, limits the replacement of existing manufactured homes, requires permits for manufactured homes that aren't required for comparable site-built homes, or requires a perimeter foundation system for a manufactured home that is incompatible with the structural design of the home. The bill allows local governments to adopt and enforce compatibility standards governing the placement of manufactured homes in residential zones, so long as they are not more stringent than standards applied to other single-family residential construction in the same zone. The bill also does not prohibit additional requirements related to historic properties, homeowners associations, or covenants on private land. This bill contains an emergency clause. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill creates guidelines for how municipalities can regulate manufactured homes which will help with the housing shortage around the state because manufactured homes are a cheaper option for most people. This bill does not interfere with HOA contracts or fire code regulations. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hardwick; and Daniel Stone Sr. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that this is a good way to increase the availability of affordable housing in the state. However, there was concern expressed that this bill may preempt municipal laws and ordinances by requiring municipalities to allow manufactured homes anywhere that does not have an HOA and does not violate any fire codes. Testifying in person on the bill was Laura Holloway, Missouri Municipal League. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 64.296 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/12/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Commerce
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/12/2026
H
- Reported Do Pass - House-Commerce
03/11/2026
H
- Voted Do Pass - House-Commerce
03/09/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/11/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 6
03/04/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Commerce
03/02/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Commerce, HR 6
02/19/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Commerce
02/10/2026
H
- Read Second Time
02/09/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB3362 - Rep. Colin Wellenkamp (R) - Creates new provisions for industrial utility users | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill requires municipally owned electric utilities and
electric cooperatives to develop a service tariff schedule
applicable to customers projected to have an annual peak demand
of 50 megawatts or more that ensures customers' rates reasonably
reflect the representative share of the costs incurred to serve
the customers and prevent other customer classes' rates from
reflecting unjust or unreasonable costs arising from service to
such customers.
Municipally owned water utilities, public water supply districts, and water corporations must develop a service tariff schedule applicable to customers projected to exceed 2,000,000 gallons per day or 80% of the available capacity for that system per day that ensures customers' rates reasonably reflect the representative share of the costs incurred to serve the customers and prevent other customer classes' rates from reflecting unjust or unreasonable costs arising from service to such customers. A water corporation must submit contracts for service to customers projected to exceed 2,000,000 gallons per day or 80% of the available capacity for that system per day for approval by the Public Service Commission. All electric providers must establish a load-shedding plan with large-load customers, as defined in the bill, for the protection or restoration of system operations that prioritize continuation of service for critical facilities and residential services. The bill also specifies that it is unlawful for any person to withdraw and use more than 2 million gallons of water per day on average in a single month unless the person holds a major industrial water user permit issued by the Department of Natural Resources, is a public water system, or the water is used for agricultural purposes. The Director of the Department must review each major industrial water user permit application to ensure certain conditions specified in the bill have been met prior to approving a major industrial water user permit application. When a person applies for a permit or permit renewal, the Department must send a written notice to the county commission of the county where the water resource is located within 30 business days after receiving the permit application. Within 120 days after the receipt of a complete application, the Director must determine whether the applicant complied with the application requirements and hold a 30-day public comment period regarding the director's determination. Within 60 days after the comment period, the Director must approve or deny the permit. To renew a valid permit, an applicant must file a renewal application with the Department no later than 271 days before the expiration of the existing permit. The Director may impose additional conditions to address any substantial or material change or may deny a renewal application as necessary to comply with the permit requirements based on any such substantial or material changes. If the Director is in the process of reviewing the renewal application before the final decision is made and the existing applicant's permit expires, the applicant is able to operate under the terms of the expired permit until a final decision is made by the Director. In the absence of an appeal, the decision of the Director shall be final. A permit is effective for five years from the date of issuance. The permit holder must annually report certain information to the Department that will be made available on the Department's website. Any other major water user may request the Department to reevaluate any existing major industrial water user permit through a mechanism created by the department. The Department must notify the major water user with the Director's findings within 120 days of the request for reevaluation. If the Attorney General receives a complaint for violations of the provisions of the bill, or at the request of the Department, the Attorney General must bring an injunctive action or other appropriate action. A suit can be brought in Cole County or any county where the defendant's principal place of business is located or where the withdrawal of water occurred. Any member of the commission deemed to have violated the provisions of the bill must forfeit his or her office upon such findings of a violation. Whenever a state of emergency is declared by the Governor in any part of the State based on drought conditions, the Department must reevaluate any existing permit. This bill is similar to HB 3364 (2025). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 247.222, 393.403, 393.1780, 394.080, 640.640, 91.015, 91.016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
03/26/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/30/2026, 1:00 PM - House-Conservation and Natural Resources, HR 7
03/24/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
02/23/2026
H
- Read Second Time
02/19/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB3364 - Rep. Mike Costlow (R) - Creates new provisions for industrial utility users | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill requires municipally owned electric utilities and
electric cooperatives to develop a service tariff schedule
applicable to customers projected to have an annual peak demand
of 50 megawatts or more that ensures customers' rates reasonably
reflect the representative share of the costs incurred to serve
the customers and prevent other customer classes' rates from
reflecting unjust or unreasonable costs arising from service to
such customers.
Municipally owned water utilities, public water supply districts, and water corporations must develop a service tariff schedule applicable to customers projected to exceed 2 million gallons per day or 80% of the available capacity for that system per day that ensures customers' rates reasonably reflect the representative share of the costs incurred to serve the customers and prevent other customer classes' rates from reflecting unjust or unreasonable costs arising from service to such customers. A water corporation must submit contracts for service to customers projected to exceed 2,000,000 gallons per day or 80% of the available capacity for that system per day for approval by the Public Service Commission. All electric providers must establish a load-shedding plan with large-load customers, as defined in the bill, for the protection or restoration of system operations that prioritize continuation of service for critical facilities and residential services. The bill also specifies that it is unlawful for any person to withdraw and use more than 2 million gallons of water per day on average in a single month unless the person holds a major industrial water user permit issued by the Department of Natural Resources, is a public water system, or the water is used for agricultural purposes. The Director of the Department must review each major industrial water user permit application to ensure certain conditions specified in the bill have been met prior to approving a major industrial water user permit application. When a person applies for a permit or permit renewal, the Department must send a written notice to the county commission of the county where the water resource is located within 30 business days after receiving the permit application. Within 120 days after the receipt of a complete application, the Director must determine whether the applicant complied with the application requirements and hold a 30-day public comment period regarding the director's determination. Within 60 days after the comment period, the Director must approve or deny the permit. To renew a valid permit, an applicant must file a renewal application with the Department no later than 271 days before the expiration of the existing permit. The Director may impose additional conditions to address any substantial or material change or may deny a renewal application as necessary to comply with the permit requirements based on any such substantial or material changes. If the Director is in the process of reviewing the renewal application before the final decision is made and the existing applicant's permit expires, the applicant is able to operate under the terms of the expired permit until a final decision is made by the Director. In the absence of an appeal, the decision of the Director shall be final. A permit is effective for five years from the date of issuance. The permit holder must annually report certain information to the Department that will be made available on the Department's website. Any other major water user may request the Department to reevaluate any existing major industrial water user permit through a mechanism created by the department. The Department must notify the major water user with the Director's findings within 120 days of the request for reevaluation. If the Attorney General receives a complaint for violations of the provisions of the bill, or at the request of the Department, the Attorney General must bring an injunctive action or other appropriate action. A suit can be brought in Cole County or any county where the defendant's principal place of business is located or where the withdrawal of water occurred. Any member of the commission deemed to have violated the provisions of the bill must forfeit his or her office upon such findings of a violation. Whenever a state of emergency is declared by the Governor in any part of the State based on drought conditions, the Department must reevaluate any existing permit. This bill is similar to HB 3362 (2026). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 247.222, 393.403, 393.1780, 394.080, 640.640, 91.015, 91.016 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/30/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/30/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
03/26/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/30/2026, 1:00 PM - House-Conservation and Natural Resources, HR 7
03/25/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Conservation and Natural Resources
02/23/2026
H
- Read Second Time
02/19/2026
S
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HB3375 - Rep. Mike Costlow (R) - Modifies provisions relating to eminent domain | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Summary: | This bill modifies provisions relating to condemnation
proceedings. The bill includes in the definition of "fair market
value" the damages on the remaining or burdened property by the
condemning authority's proposed use to be included in the
determination of fair market value of a taking of less than the
entire value of the property. Fair market value does not include
any increase in the value of the remaining or burdened property
caused by the condemning authority's proposed use.
The bill also modifies the definition of "heritage value" by changing the percentage assigned to property owned by the same family for more than 50 years from 50% of fair market value to 20%. Electrical corporations may not use eminent domain for the construction or erection of any plant, tower, panel, or facility that: (1) Uses, captures, or converts wind or air currents to generate or manufacture electricity; or (2) Uses, captures, or converts the light or heat generated by the sun to generate or manufacture electricity. A corporation, political subdivision, state agency, cooperative, or person with the authority to condemn property must give a 15- day notice to the property owner for purposes relating to surveying. Additionally, for easements acquired either by voluntary means or condemnation by corporations, political subdivisions, state agencies, cooperatives, or persons with the authority to condemn property, the bill requires 5 days notice for entry and other duties related to abandonment or damages occurring to the property. Any corporation, political subdivision, state agency, cooperative, or person that violates the notice requirement or other duties will be subject to a civil action by the property owner, the Attorney General, or prosecuting attorney for a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for each violation for each day, not to exceed $100,000 for all related violations. Currently, upon the filing of a condemnation petition, a summons must be issued, giving a property owner at least 10 days from the date of service before the petition may be heard. The bill extends the notice before a hearing from 10 days to 60 days and a property owner has 30 days from the date of service to answer such petition. A failure to answer does not constitute a default of the owner's rights to a hearing. At the initial hearing, the condemning authority will have the burden to prove that there is statutory authority to condemn the property and that the law, rules, and bylaws have been followed. The bill also modifies just compensation for condemned property to include compensation equal to the amount of any taxes owed by a property owner as a consequence of the eminent domain proceeding. For condemnations that result in a beginning farmer taking, as defined in the bill, the just compensation is an amount equivalent to the fair market value multiplied by 125% plus the amount of such taxes. Additionally, the condemning authority must include in the notice and written offer provided before the filing of a petition a statement that the property owner has the right to seek an award for heritage value, a homestead taking, or a beginning farmer taking, the right to seek attorney's fees if the amount awarded is greater than the offer, and a copy of the laws regarding notices by and duties of the condemning authority and the list of obligations and remedies provided. The bill repeals the requirement that the electrical transmission line be designed to transmit electricity at 345-kilovolts or greater for determinations of good faith negotiations of condemnation of any agricultural or horticultural property for the construction of an electrical transmission line. For considerations of alternative locations, the written statement by the condemning authority to the owner on the reasoning for the rejection or acceptance of alternative locations must be specific, rather than a brief statement. Any rejection of the landowner's suggested alternative location must not be arbitrary or capricious or induced by fraud, collusion, or bad faith, and must be supported by substantial evidence. A condemning authority or the owner can seek a determination by the circuit court that these requirements have been met. The bill also repeals the provision that any number of owners, residents in the same county or circuit, may be joined in one petition, except that the damages must be separately assessed. This bill is similar to SB 1699 (2026). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Citations: | 523.001, 523.010, 523.020, 523.030, 523.039, 523.040, 523.250, 523.253, 523.256, 523.265, 523.061, 523.015 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Progress: | House: In Committee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Last Action: |
03/25/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bill History: |
03/25/2026
H
- Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues
03/23/2026
H
- Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 4:00 PM - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues, HR 5
03/09/2026
H
- Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues
02/24/2026
H
- Read Second Time
02/23/2026
H
- Introduced and Read First Time
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||