Tracking List: MAC 2026 - Agriculture

SB879 - Sen. Travis Fitzwater (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Summary: SB 879 - The act creates and modifies provisions relating to electric utilities.

PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SOLAR FARMS (Section 67.5350)

Under the act, prior to obtaining a certificate of public convenience or necessity from the Public Service Commission, any person constructing a solar farm shall first submit an application to the county commission in each county where the solar farm is to be located.

The county commission of any county shall adopt an order or an ordinance requiring a permit to construct a solar farm within specified boundaries in an unincorporated area within the county. The permit shall be constructed within specific distances from certain properties described in the act. The permit shall require noise levels not to exceed 45 decibels from any property line.

Within 90 days of receiving an application for a permit, the county commission shall hold a public meeting before the issuance of a permit. Notice shall be provided at least 14 days prior to the public meeting. The applicant shall provide certain information at the public meeting as described in the act.

No later than 90 days after the public meeting, the county commission shall do the following:

- Issue a permit;

- Issue a permit limiting the boundaries of the proposed solar farm; or

- Deny the permit.

Any applicant intending to make a material amendment to the permit once it is issued shall submit a new application for the permit to the county commission. The county commission shall require any applicant who is issued a permit to obtain liability insurance in an amount sufficient to cover any damages which may arise from the construction of the solar farm.

The Public Service Commission shall not issue a certificate of public convenience or necessity to any applicant who did not receive a permit from a county commission in each county where the solar farm is to be located.

The county commission of any county where a solar farm is proposed to be constructed shall require a decommissioning plan of the solar farm, as described in the act.

This provision has an emergency clause.

These provisions are similar to provisions in SB 213 (2025) and SB 892 (2024).

TAXATION OF SOLAR ENERGY PROJECTS (Section 137.100, 137.124, 153.030, & 153.034)

Current law exempts solar energy systems not held for resale from property taxes. This act repeals such provision and provides that solar energy systems constructed for exclusive use of a single property may be exempted from property tax at the discretion of the county assessor.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, or tangible personal property associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity and that was built or constructed to sell power, the tax liability actually owed shall be equal to $6,000 per megawatt of nameplate capacity and shall be adjusted for inflation annually.

Nothing in this provision shall be construed to prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or similar tax abatement agreements or to affect any existing enhanced enterprise zone agreements.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing land that is associated with a solar energy project, the land shall be assessed as commercial property.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for any public utility that has a solar energy project, such solar energy project shall be assessed using certain methodology for real and personal property as described in the act.

The real and tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar energy shall include certain solar equipment as described in the act.

These provisions are identical to SB 892 (2024), HB 2651 (2024), SB 549 (2023), SB 1014 (2022) and HB 1997 (2022), and similar to provisions in SB 213 (2025), a provision in HCS#2/HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).

COMMISSION'S RULEMAKING AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINES ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (Section 393.172)

By March 31, 2027, the Public Service Commission shall promulgate rules applicable to electrical corporations requiring construction of electric transmission lines for which permission is sought from the Commission to adhere to specific standards relating to construction activities occurring on privately owned agricultural land. Such standards are described in the act.

This provision is identical to a provision in SB 213 (2025), SB 892 (2024), and similar to a provision in HB 221 (2025), a provision in SB 139 (2025), a provision in SB 805 (2024).

SOLAR PROJECTS NOT TO EXCEED MORE THAN 2% OF ALL CROPLAND (Section 393.1120)

The total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in any county shall not be more than 2% of all cropland in the county.

The county commission or other authorized governing body may increase the percentage of cropland by order, ordinance, regulation, or vote of the residents of the county.

Any resident of the county shall have standing to bring suit to enforce these provisions against a solar energy project developer.

For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, such project shall be subject to setback distances, as described in the act. This provision shall not apply to solar projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2026.

A solar energy company shall secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection for the solar energy project to connect to the electrical grid prior to beginning construction of the solar energy project.

This provision is similar to a provision in HB 440 (2025).

CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY (Section 523.010)

Under the act, the authority of any electrical corporation to condemn property shall not extend to the construction of any structure or facility that uses wind or solar energy to generate or manufacture electricity.

The authority of any electrical corporation to condemn property shall extend to acquisition of rights needed to construct, operate, and maintain certain electrical infrastructure, described in the act, needed to collect and deliver solar or wind energy to the distribution or transmission grid.

This provision is identical to SB 199 (2025), a provision in SB 214 (2025), SB 1262 (2024), to a provision in SB 805 (2024), a provision in HB 1449 (2024), a provision in SCS/HCS/HB 1746 (2024), provisions in HB 1052 (2023) and substantially similar to a provision in HB 221 (2025), a provision in HCS#2/HBs 440 & 1160 (2025), HB 475 (2025), a provision in SB 139 (2025), HB 1750 (2024), and SB 577 (2023).

JULIA SHEVELEVA

Citations: 137.100, 137.124, 153.030, 153.034, 393.172, 393.1120, 523.010, 67.5350
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/11/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/11/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar






01/08/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB914 - Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R) - Modifies provisions relating to sewage regulation
Summary: SS/SB 914 - This act modifies provisions relating to sewage regulation.

The act repeals a provision stating that a state standard for the location, size of sewage tanks and length of lateral lines is based on the percolation or permeability rate of the soil. Under the act, the state standard is based on soil properties.

The act repeals a provision stating that soil tests are to be performed by persons who are qualified to perform the percolation tests and creates a new provision authorizing on-site soil evaluators registered by the Department of Health and Senior Services to conduct soils morphology evaluations.

This act repeals a provision stating that contractors may be taught and allowed to perform percolation tests.

The act repeals a provision relating to the Department of Health and Senior Services periodically reviewing any county and city regulation and enforcement record to ensure that the state standard for sewage regulation is being enforced.

The act creates a mandatory registration program requiring continuing education before January 1, 2027, for on-site wastewater treatment system professionals qualified to perform percolation tests in accordance with the state standard as described in the act. Before January 1, 2027, the administrative authority may accept a percolation test at its own discretion if a soil morphology evaluation cannot be reasonably obtained. This provision shall be void and of no effect after December 31, 2026.

Under the act, any person who intends to construct or make major modifications or repairs to an on-site sewage disposal system must submit an application fee and obtain a construction permit.

The act repeals certain provisions relating to fees for repair of on-site sewage disposal systems.

Under the act, the Department shall promulgate regulations establishing the conditions and requirements for the construction permit application, including the collection of reasonable fees set at a level to produce revenue not exceeding the cost and expense of administering the provisions under the act.

The act is substantially similar to SB 601 (2025), a provision in the perfected HB 200 (2025), a provision in HCS/SS/SB 61 (2025), HB 2083 (2024), HB 814 (2023), and substantially similar to SB 1283 (2024), and SB 523 (2023).

JULIA SHEVELEVA

Citations: 701.040, 701.046
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Local Government

Bill History:
03/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Local Government

03/25/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Local Government

03/23/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Local Government, HR 5

03/11/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Local Government

03/09/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/11/2026, 8:00 AM - House - Local Government, HR 5

02/27/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Local Government

02/16/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/12/2026 
H - Reported to the House and read first time

02/12/2026 
S - Third Read and Passed - Y-29 N-1

02/12/2026 
S - Laid out for consideration

02/10/2026 
S - Perfected

02/10/2026 
S - Floor Substitute Adopted

02/10/2026 
S - Laid out for consideration






01/08/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
S - Read First Time

12/01/2025 
S - Pre-Filed

SB1586 - Sen. Ben Brown (R) - Modifies provisions relating to solid waste management
Summary:

SCS/SB 1586 - The act modifies certain provisions relating to solid waste management.

 

Under the act, no person may transfer title to any property containing a solid waste disposal site or demolition landfill without disclosing the sale, conveyance, or transfer to the Department of Natural Resources. The seller shall inform the buyer with a written notice signed and dated by the seller about the existence and location of the disposal or landfill site. If the seller fails to send the written notice to the buyer, the buyer may cancel the sale and the seller shall return to the buyer any earnest money paid by the buyer to the seller.

 

The act provides that any person or entity that applies for a grant shall not be disqualified from receiving such grant on the basis that there is a familial relationship between the applicant and any member of the Department, instead of the solid management district executive board as currently provided.

 

After October 1, 2027, an annual adjustment of fees collected for solid waste accepted shall be based on the percentage increase measured by the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers for the preceding year.

 

The Department shall have the authority to assess, investigate, test, remediate, and manage abandoned solid waste disposal areas.

 

The Department shall allocate a percentage of revenue dedicated to grants previously managed by solid waste management districts. This percentage shall serve as a minimum percentage of revenue to fund such grants and shall be calculated as follows: the total grant amount previously administered by solid waste management districts for the previous three fiscal years divided by the total amount of solid waste tonnage fees from the previous three fiscal years. Such percentage of revenue shall be divided as follows: 40% shall be allocated based on the population within the geographical area of each regional office of the Department in the latest decennial census, and 60% shall be allocated based on the amount of revenue generated within each geographical area of each regional office of the Department. Revenue generated within each geographical area of each regional office of the Department shall be determined from the previous year's data. Moneys shall be awarded based upon grant applications.

 

The act repeals certain provisions relating to the distribution of the revenues.

 

Grants for proposals that will promote and maximize the sharing of district resources shall no longer be part of the criteria to establish the order of grant authority.

 

Any allocated moneys remaining in any fiscal year due to insufficient or inadequate grant applications shall be reallocated for grant applications in subsequent years or for Department operations, instead of solid waste management projects as provided in current law.

 

All remaining revenues not included in the calculation relating to the maintenance of essential grants, instead of 39% of the revenues as currently provided, shall be dedicated, upon appropriation, to the elimination of illegal solid waste disposal.

 

The act repeals certain provisions relating to any allocated district moneys remaining after five years. The act repeals a provision relating to sample audits of grants. The act repeals a provision relating to the criteria for allocation of grant moneys.

 

The act provides that the Department shall promulgate criteria for evaluating grants by rule and regulation.

 

The act further repeals certain provisions relating to funds awarded to solid waste management districts and grants approved by the solid waste management districts.

 

The act provides that the state solid waste management districts shall be dissolved effective August 28, 2026. By December 31, 2026, each solid waste management district shall: submit a final financial audit, remit any leftover moneys to the Solid Waste Management Fund, provide a list of open grants, and provide a complete itemized list of all grants awarded for the previous three fiscal years.

 

Effective August 28, 2026, the Department shall take over the oversight of open district grants.

 

The act repeals certain provisions relating to solid waste management regions, a Solid Waste Management Council, executive boards of solid waste management districts, and the Solid Waste Advisory Board.

JULIA SHEVELEVA

Citations: 260.213, 260.300, 260.302, 260.305, 260.310, 260.315, 260.320, 260.324, 260.325, 260.330, 260.335, 260.345, 260.336
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/24/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

Bill History:
03/24/2026 
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

03/24/2026 
S - Laid out for consideration

03/09/2026 
S - Reported Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Agriculture, Food Production, and Outdoor Resources

03/05/2026 

02/19/2026 


02/05/2026 

02/05/2026 
S - Read Second Time

01/22/2026 
S - Introduced and Read First Time

HB2288 - Rep. Brad Pollitt (R) - Modifies setback distances for certain areas in regards to solid waste disposal
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs by a vote of 10 to 5.

This bill authorizes any county to adopt an ordinance, rule, regulation, or standard relating to solid waste management in the county as specified in the bill. Any setback applicable to a solid waste disposal area may not be more stringent than:

(1) Three miles from defined incorporated limits of a city, town, or village within the county; an accredited school or certain property owned and operated by school districts or educational institutions; a church or place of worship; a platted subdivision; or public areas designated for recreational activity;

(2) Three-quarters of a mile from any occupied dwelling used for residential purposes for at least six months a year; and

(3) Two hundred feet from the property line of the solid waste disposal area.

This bill is similar to HB 372 (2025).

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the Pettis County landfill took in 618,000 tons of waste last year, while the county only produced 22,000. There is a massive importing of trash, and Pettis doesn?t want to be the trash capitol of the region. This bill allows local governments to make setbacks to protect the health of their land and communities. Rural Missouri is used as the solution to urban Missouri?s problems. Local governments that wish to can determine less stringent guidelines. Thousands signed the petition to stop the landfill, and it is good to be a net exporter of waste. Trash blows out of trucks when shipping trash into Pettis County, and the county has to clean it up. Statutes allow local regulation already. Failing to place clear guidance in statute forces courts to make determinations they aren?t well-equipped to make, and local governments are placed in conflict with the Department of Natural Resources.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Pollitt; Arnie Dienoff; Israel Baeza, County of Pettis; and Bill Taylor. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that Missouri has become one of the largest waste exporters in the country, exporting 1/3 of all waste. Landfills have been failing to gain authorization in Missouri. The facilities are painstakingly located, and the upcoming landfill is set to be one of the most remote facilities in the State. This will eliminate the ability of new landfills to be sited or expanded. These plans are a critical component of economic development and public health. Opponents further state permitting landfills is no walk in the park now. The average permit time is 7-9 years, and 90% of facilities are rejected. These sites prevent illegal dumping and poisoned groundwater. Without the ability to dispose of waste, Missouri will also struggle to attract heavy industry as it comes back to the United States. It is more expensive and environmentally damaging to not handle this issue ourselves.

Testifying in person against the bill were Derrick Standley, Presidio Environmental; and Trail Consulting.



Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 260.217
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/05/2026 

Bill History:
03/05/2026 

03/04/2026 

03/04/2026 



02/16/2026 


02/02/2026 


01/25/2026 
H - Committee hearing cancelled - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm - HR 6 - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs


01/08/2026 

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

12/09/2025 
H - Pre-Filed

HB2762 - Rep. Brad Banderman (R) - Modifies and creates new provisions relating to utilities
Summary: COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Utilities by a vote of 16 to 3.

The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2762, 2816 & 2402.

Beginning August 28, 2026, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, or tangible personal property associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $4,000 per megawatt of nameplate capacity. All land associated with the project that uses solar energy to generate electricity, except for land used as setbacks or undeveloped, will be assessed as commercial property.

As specified in this bill, if any public utility company has ownership of any real or personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy directly to generate electricity, such solar or wind energy project property will be valued and taxed by any local authorities having jurisdiction.

Beginning January 1, 2027, for any public utility company that has a solar energy project, such solar energy project must be assessed with any solar energy property of such company assessed upon the county assessor's local tax rolls, and all other real property, excluding land, or personal property related to the solar energy project assessed using the methodology as specified in the bill.

For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks, specified in the bill, from adjacent property and the property line.

A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project.

A solar energy project must provide written notice to the county before the start of construction, file a decommissioning plan with the county, and prior to construction, secure a bond in the amount of descommissioning the project and reclaiming the land as required in the bill. The bill also prohibits the use of eminent domain by electrical corporations for the construction or erection of any plant, tower, panel, or facility that:

(1) Uses, captures, or converts wind or air currents to generate or manufacture electricity; or

(2) Uses, captures, or converts the light or heat generated by the sun to generate or manufacture electricity.

The bill specifies that the authority of any corporation to condemn property must extend to the acquisition of rights needed to construct, operate, and maintain the collection, distribution, communication, and transmission lines, substations, switchyards and other facilities needed to collect and deliver energy generated or manufactured by solar or wind facilities.

The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill.

PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill would give solar developers long term clarity with reasonable requirements for facilities that protect area landowners. It will also provide consistent statewide rules for taxation of such facilities.

Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Banderman; Azimuth Renewables, LLC; Laura Stinson; Clean Grid Alliance; Missouri Farm Bureau; and Renew Missouri.

OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the provisions relating to the dissolution of a water district lowers the involvement of the district residents. The bill would allow the board to lower the threshold needed to sell, which reduces the voting power of the customers.

Testifying in person against the bill were Association Of Water Districts; Tenaska; Missouri Rural Water Association; and Armorine.

OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the bill includes requirements for solar facilities to protect adjacent landowners and counties but that the provisions are not strict enough. The setbacks and the tax liability should be higher. The facilities are a safety risk and the local emergency services need to be trained to handle emergencies involving solar energy facilities. Testifying in person on the bill were John R. Burns; Cody Holt; Missouri Solar Energy Industries Association (MOSEIA); Mark C. Taylor; Susan Burns, Mid Missouri Landowners Alliance LLC; and Ameren Missouri.

Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Citations: 137.016, 137.124, 153.030, 153.034, 393.1120, 523.010
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

Bill History:
03/26/2026 
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

03/26/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

03/25/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/26/2026, 2:30 PM - House-Utilities, HR 1

03/25/2026 
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Utilities

03/23/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

03/09/2026 
H - ** REVISED for LOCATION ** - 3/9/26 - 1:00 pm - HR 7 - House-Utilities

03/04/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/09/2026, 1:00 PM - House-Utilities, HR 7

02/25/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Utilities

02/19/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/25/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

02/16/2026 
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 2/18/26 - 8:00 am - HR 1 - House-Utilities

02/12/2026 
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/18/2026, 8:00 AM - House-Utilities, HR 1

02/12/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Utilities

01/08/2026 
H - Read Second Time

01/07/2026 
H - Read First Time

01/06/2026 
H - Pre-Filed

HB3375 - Rep. Mike Costlow (R) - Modifies provisions relating to eminent domain
Summary: This bill modifies provisions relating to condemnation proceedings. The bill includes in the definition of "fair market value" the damages on the remaining or burdened property by the condemning authority's proposed use to be included in the determination of fair market value of a taking of less than the entire value of the property. Fair market value does not include any increase in the value of the remaining or burdened property caused by the condemning authority's proposed use.

The bill also modifies the definition of "heritage value" by changing the percentage assigned to property owned by the same family for more than 50 years from 50% of fair market value to 20%.

Electrical corporations may not use eminent domain for the construction or erection of any plant, tower, panel, or facility that:

(1) Uses, captures, or converts wind or air currents to generate or manufacture electricity; or

(2) Uses, captures, or converts the light or heat generated by the sun to generate or manufacture electricity.

A corporation, political subdivision, state agency, cooperative, or person with the authority to condemn property must give a 15- day notice to the property owner for purposes relating to surveying. Additionally, for easements acquired either by voluntary means or condemnation by corporations, political subdivisions, state agencies, cooperatives, or persons with the authority to condemn property, the bill requires 5 days notice for entry and other duties related to abandonment or damages occurring to the property. Any corporation, political subdivision, state agency, cooperative, or person that violates the notice requirement or other duties will be subject to a civil action by the property owner, the Attorney General, or prosecuting attorney for a civil penalty of up to $1,000 for each violation for each day, not to exceed $100,000 for all related violations.

Currently, upon the filing of a condemnation petition, a summons must be issued, giving a property owner at least 10 days from the date of service before the petition may be heard. The bill extends the notice before a hearing from 10 days to 60 days and a property owner has 30 days from the date of service to answer such petition. A failure to answer does not constitute a default of the owner's rights to a hearing. At the initial hearing, the condemning authority will have the burden to prove that there is statutory authority to condemn the property and that the law, rules, and bylaws have been followed.

The bill also modifies just compensation for condemned property to include compensation equal to the amount of any taxes owed by a property owner as a consequence of the eminent domain proceeding. For condemnations that result in a beginning farmer taking, as defined in the bill, the just compensation is an amount equivalent to the fair market value multiplied by 125% plus the amount of such taxes.

Additionally, the condemning authority must include in the notice and written offer provided before the filing of a petition a statement that the property owner has the right to seek an award for heritage value, a homestead taking, or a beginning farmer taking, the right to seek attorney's fees if the amount awarded is greater than the offer, and a copy of the laws regarding notices by and duties of the condemning authority and the list of obligations and remedies provided.

The bill repeals the requirement that the electrical transmission line be designed to transmit electricity at 345-kilovolts or greater for determinations of good faith negotiations of condemnation of any agricultural or horticultural property for the construction of an electrical transmission line.

For considerations of alternative locations, the written statement by the condemning authority to the owner on the reasoning for the rejection or acceptance of alternative locations must be specific, rather than a brief statement. Any rejection of the landowner's suggested alternative location must not be arbitrary or capricious or induced by fraud, collusion, or bad faith, and must be supported by substantial evidence. A condemning authority or the owner can seek a determination by the circuit court that these requirements have been met.

The bill also repeals the provision that any number of owners, residents in the same county or circuit, may be joined in one petition, except that the damages must be separately assessed.

This bill is similar to SB 1699 (2026).
Citations: 523.001, 523.010, 523.020, 523.030, 523.039, 523.040, 523.250, 523.253, 523.256, 523.265, 523.061, 523.015
Progress: House: In Committee
Last Action:
03/25/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues

Bill History:
03/25/2026 
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues

03/23/2026 

03/09/2026 
H - Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Rural Issues

02/24/2026 
H - Read Second Time

02/23/2026 
H - Introduced and Read First Time