2024 School Administrators Coalition Tracking

670 bills
HB1607 Modifies guidelines for student participation in athletic contests organized by sex
Sponsor Rep. Hardy Billington (R)
Summary
Currently, schools are only allowed to let a student compete in an athletics competition designated for the biological sex of the student, as stated on the student's official birth certificate, with the exception that female students can participate in competitions designated for male students if there is no corresponding athletics competition designed for female students available. This provision is set to expire on August 28th, 2027. The bill removes the expiration date. This bill is similar to HB 36 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/28/2026
H - Superseded by HB 1663

HB1609 Enacts provisions governing flags displayed in public school classrooms
Sponsor Rep. Hardy Billington (R)
Summary
This bill authorizes public schools to fly the flag of The United States, the Missouri State flag, the POW/MIA flag, or the school flag and restricts public schools from flying any other flag. This bill is similar to HB 1398 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1612 Requires school districts to display the Ten Commandments in each building and classroom in the school district
Sponsor Rep. Hardy Billington (R)
Summary
This bill requires that beginning January 1, 2027, school districts and charter schools must display the Ten Commandments in each building and classroom. The bill provides specific criteria for the posting of the Ten Commandments and authorizes the use of public funds to purchase such displays. However, the school board or governing board is not required to spend the board's moneys to purchase the displays. This bill is similar to HB 34 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1613 Moves local elections to the general election day
Sponsor Rep. Bill Allen (R)
Summary
This bill moves all local government and political subdivision elections to the State general election date, with some exceptions. For local governments that have primary elections, the date of the primary is moved to the State primary election date. The following elections are not included in the provisions of the bill: (1) Special elections to fill a vacancy, break a tie, or decide an election contest; (2) Bond elections necessitated by natural disasters and other emergencies; and (3) Elections in charter counties and charter cities.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1622 Adds provisions relating to just compensation for condemned agricultural and horticultural property
Sponsor Rep. Bruce Sassmann (R)
Summary
This bill specifies that for condemnation of agricultural and horticultural properties that prevent the owner from using the property in substantially the same manner as before, compensation is an amount equivalent to the fair market value plus an additional percent for each year the property has been owned by the same family.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1627 Modifies provisions governing the Career and Technical Education Advisory Council
Sponsor Rep. Willard Haley (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Higher Education and Workforce Development by a vote of 12 to 0. This bill modifies the membership of the "Career and Technical Education Advisory Council" to include the commissioner of higher education or his or her designees. Currently, the Council has an individual from the business community with a background in commerce. This bill modifies that to four individuals from business and commerce. Additional alterations to the current Council make-up are specified and the length of member terms is reduced from five to three years with no member serving more than two terms. Currently, the Council is required to meet four times annually. This bill reduces that requirement to two times annually and reporting requirements for the Council to the State Board of Education are repealed. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the Career and Technical Council has evolved over time and these changes will add influential higher education partners as well as adding members of the business community. The change to meeting twice a year is a minimum and if there are pressing issues the council may meet more often. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Haley; and Perry Gorrell, Department of Elementary & Secondary Education. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/09/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB1631 Modifies provisions governing tangible personal property assessments of boats
Sponsor Rep. Willard Haley (R)
Summary
Currently, certain items of tangible personal property used for lodging must be assessed for property tax purposes in the county where the items are located, rather than the county in which the owner resides. These items include houseboats, cabin cruisers, and manufactured homes. This bill requires that floating boat docks and motor boats, if the motor boats are housed or stored outside the owner?s county of residence on a boat lift or in a marina, and are not regularly transported to the owner?s county of residence, also be assessed for property tax purposes in the county where the items are located, rather than the county in which the owner resides. This bill is similar to HB 54 (2025) and HB 54 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1639 Establishes the "Missouri Pathways to Access and Success Act"
Sponsor Rep. Matthew Overcast (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Missouri Pathways to Access and Success Act" (PASA) which requires public institutions of higher education to adopt a policy on the documentation required for students to establish a disability and that they are eligible for accommodations. The bill provides examples of acceptable documentation including a prior individualized education program (IEP), 504 plan, or services under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), among others listed in the bill. Institutions must be transparent and provide information on the determination of eligibility to students, parents, and faculty as well as on the institution's website. The bill requires licensing bodies that administer a professional licensing exam as a requirement for obtaining a license, certificate, registration, permit, or other authorization to legally practice an occupation or profession in Missouri to take into account an applicant's documented history of accommodations on comparable standardized exams. Such accommodations must be granted to applicants unless evidence indicates that the nature of the exam would be altered or an undue burden would occur. Licensing bodies must treat qualified treating professionals' opinions with deference and consider them valid. Written notification from the licensing bodies must be provided within 30 days after receiving an application requesting accommodations and denials must include detailed explanations. Documentation requirements must not be excessive and applicants have a right to appeal a denial to an independent review panel established within the Division of Professional Registration of the Department of Commerce and Insurance. The bill provides for reimbursement of attorney's fees and costs incurred in administrative proceedings, appeals, or litigation necessary to obtain accommodations if the review panel finds in favor of the applicant. The bill requires that before February 1st licensing bodies report annually to the Department on the number of requests received, granted, denied, and appealed and the outcomes of each request and that such bodies complete ADA and accommodation compliance training every two years. The training will be provided by an approved ADA compliance expert as determined by the Missouri Commission on Human Rights or a Federally recognized entity.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1644 Creates new provisions relating to joint employers
Sponsor Rep. Matthew Overcast (R)
Summary
HB 1644 -- EMPLOYER-EMPLOYEE RELATIONSHIP (Overcast) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Economic Development This bill provides that neither a franchisee nor a franchisee's employees will be considered an employee of a franchisor for any purpose, unless the franchisor exercises direct and immediate control over the hiring, termination, discipline, and direction of the franchisee's employees. This bill is similar to HB 1068 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/06/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight

HB1645 Modifies the statute of limitations for personal injury claims and childhood sexual abuse, injury, or illness
Sponsor Rep. Matthew Overcast (R)
Summary
Currently, actions for personal injury or bodily injury, including those relating to uninsured motorist coverage or underinsured motorist coverage, must be brought within five years from the date the injury occurred. This bill reduces the time frame to two years from when the injury occurred, for injuries occurring after August 28, 2026. Currently, civil actions for childhood sexual abuse must be commenced within 10 years of the plaintiff turning 21 or within three years of the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered that the injury or illness was caused by childhood sexual abuse, whichever occurs later. This bill changes the 10 years to 20 years for any action that arises on or after August 28, 2026. It also adds the offense of sexual exploitation of a minor to the definition of "childhood sexual abuse" in this section. This bill is similar to HB 68 (2025) and HB 1964 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/25/2026
H - Superseded by HB 1664

HB1654 Establishes sovereignty of Missouri law and protects religious freedoms
Sponsor Rep. Mike Steinmeyer (R)
Summary
This bill reaffirms the federal and state constitutions as the supreme law of the land, and that no foreign government, international body, or religious system shall in any way usurp either the federal or state constitutions. This bill reaffirms the freedom of expression and practice of religion by any individual, group, or organization, but prohibits coercive threats or use of force to impose any foreign or religious law upon residents of the state of Missouri. The Missouri Attorney General shall have the authority to investigate and prosecute violations in cooperation with local prosecutors.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1656 Modifies provisions governing port authorities
Sponsor Rep. Mike Steinmeyer (R)
Summary
This bill provides that if a port authority created as a political subdivision purchases or leases real property located within an adjoining municipality or state, such real property is deemed included within the port district and the port authority can exercise its powers there. Under this bill, if a port authority purchases or leases certain real property located within adjoining municipalities or states, the real property must be deemed included within the port district as described in the bill (Section 68.015). The bill permits every approved local and regional port authority to acquire, own, lease, sell, mortgage, encumber, or otherwise dispose of interest in real property in adjoining municipalities and states; to create and operate agencies and departments as necessary; establish port rangers; contract with other port authorities; and to perform other acts as necessary (Section 68.025). This bill prohibits the use of certain State funds for housing authority purposes. The bill allows a department or office receiving an appropriation of State funds for a project to be undertaken by a port authority to, by agreement, advance the designated funds to the port authority in that fiscal year in lieu of providing the funds on a reimbursement basis. The port authority will be required to repay the funds in the event it violates the requirements of the agreement. In lieu of designating moneys to the port authority, the department or office of the State are also allowed to designate moneys with a financial institution or escrow agent to be held and disbursed, subject to the terms of an agreement (Section 68.035). The bill provides that failure of a port authority to include a statement that the state is not liable on bonds of a port authority as required by law will not invalidate the bonds or render the state liable on the bonds (Section 68.040). This bill allows commissioners of port authorities to serve until a successor has been appointed. In the event the county or city that creates the port authority operates under a charter form of government, the method of appointment, required qualifications, salaries, and powers, must be provided in the charter. The bill permits a board of port authority commissioners to determine the qualifications, salaries, powers, and duties of the board in its bylaws if the governing body of the county or municipality that created the port authority fails to do so. The bill specifies the method for removing a member of a board of port authority commissioners (Section 68.045). This bill authorizes port authorities to use additional procurement methods authorized by State law (Section 68.055). Currently, any expenditure by a port authority over $25,000, including professional service contracts, must be competitively bid. This bill raises that amount to $75,000, and requires newspaper notification of these bids be no fewer than 20 days prior to awarding the contract. The port authority will also have the authority to reject bids or proposals and to readvertise the work or proposed purchase (Section 68.057). The bill provides that the boards of existing port authorities can apply to the State Highways and Transportation Commission for approval of a regional port authority, as detailed in the bill (Section 68.060). The bill modifies the definition of "new job" as currently defined in the Advanced Industrial Manufacturing Zones Act (AIM Zone) and specifies that only jobs created after the date of the establishment of the AIM zone can be considered new jobs, with the exception of certain jobs determined by the Missouri Department of Economic Development (Section 68.075). This bill allows records and documents submitted to a port authority pertaining to a business prospect the authority is negotiating to be considered closed records for the purposes of public disclosure law (Section 68.085). Under current law, "consent" is considered the written acknowledgment and approval of the creation of a district by the owners of real property collectively owning more than 60% of the assessed value of the real property within the boundaries of the proposed district, and more than 60% per capita of the owners of property within those boundaries. This bill lowers 60% to 50% in both instances (Section 68.205). The bill exempts consideration of a petition by the circuit court if the port authority is the owner of all real property within the district for which a change has been proposed or if 100% of the owners of all real property within the district have consented in writing to the project (Section 68.253). This bill is similar to SCS HCS HB 1346 (2025).
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
12/18/2025
H - Withdrawn

HB1657 Establishes provisions relating to the protection of primary residences for certain persons
Sponsor Rep. Mike Steinmeyer (R)
Summary
Under this bill, no primary residence owned and occupied by a recipient of social security or supplemental security income can be subject to attachment, execution, levy, garnishment, lien, or forced sale under any legal or equitable process arising from a civil judgment or debt the mortgage, tax, insurance, or maintenance payments on the residence are made in whole or in part with income from social security. However, these exemptions do not apply to: (1) Property tax liens owed to the state or a political subdivision; (2) Mortgages or deeds of trust voluntarily executed by the homeowner; or (3) Federally authorized offsets for child support, alimony, or criminal restitution. Under this bill, no primary residence owned and occupied by a an honorably discharged veteran who is a recipient of veterans' benefits can be subject to attachment, execution, levy, garnishment, lien , or forced sale under any legal or equitable process arising from a civil judgment or debt the mortgage, tax, insurance, or maintenance payments on the residence are made in whole or in part with income from veterans' benefits. However, these exemptions do not apply to: (1) Property tax liens owed to the state or a political subdivision; (2) Mortgages or deeds of trust voluntarily executed by the homeowner; or (3) Federally authorized offsets for child support, alimony, or criminal restitution. In any civil proceeding in which a creditor seeks to execute a judgment against real property, the court shall, upon claim by the debtor or the debtor's representative, hold a hearing to determine whether the exemption applies. Any creditor, collection agency, or legal entity that knowingly initiates or continues with an enforcement action in violation of this section will be liable for: (1) Actual damages; (2) Statutory damages of not less than $2,500 per occurrence; and (3) Reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. The attorney general will have authority to bring civil actions for injunctive relief or penalties for violations.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1662 Requires public schools to provide free breakfasts and lunches to all students attending classes in such school
Sponsor Rep. Brian Seitz (R)
Summary
This bill requires that beginning in the 2026-27 school year, each public school must provide all enrolled students with a free breakfast and lunch each day the student attends school. This bill is similar to HB 112 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1663 Modifies guidelines for student participation in athletic contests organized by sex
Sponsor Rep. Brian Seitz (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 1663, 1607 & 1973 -- PARTICIPATION IN ATHLETICS COMPETITIONS (Seitz) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Emerging Issues Currently, schools can only allow students to compete in athletics competitions designated for the student's biological sex, as indicated on the student's official birth certificate. Except that female students may participate in athletics competitions designated for male students if no corresponding competition for female students is offered. This provision is set to expire on August 28th, 2027. The bill removes the expiration date for this language. This bill is similar to HB 36 and HB 113 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/28/2026
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-Education

HB1664 Modifies provisions relating to statutes of limitation
Sponsor Rep. Brian Seitz (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 1664, 1610, 1645 & 2182 -- STATUTES OF LIMITATION (Seitz) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Judiciary This bill adds to the three-year statute of limitation actions that accrue on or after August 28, 2026, for any injury to the person or rights of another not arising on contract and not otherwise provided for by law, including actions for personal injury or bodily injury and actions that accrue on or after August 28, 2026, against insurers relating to uninsured motorist coverage or under-insured motorist coverage, including any action to enforce such coverage. The bill adds the offense of sexual exploitation of a minor to the current definition of "childhood sexual abuse" in the context of civil actions to recover damages from injury or illness caused by childhood sexual abuse. Currently, any action to recover damages from injury or illness caused by childhood sexual abuse must be commenced within 10 years of the plaintiff turning 21 years of age or within three years of the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered the injury or illness was caused by childhood sexual abuse, whichever later occurs. This bill changes the time frame to 20 years and provides certain qualifiers for the individual who would be liable for the offense, as specified in the bill. The bill requires any action to recover damages from such abuse in an action brought against a person other than what is referenced in Section 537.046, RSMo, to be commenced within five years of the plaintiff turning 21 years of age. This bill is similar to HB 114 (2025) and HB 1617 (2024).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/21/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB1668 Creates the "Foreign Adversary Divestment Act", requiring the state and local government entities to divest from investments in foreign adversaries
Sponsor Rep. Brian Seitz (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Foreign Adversary Divestment Act". All "State-managed funds", as defined in the bill, are prohibited from holding investments in any "foreign adversary", as defined in the bill, "State-owned enterprise" of a foreign adversary, company domiciled within a foreign adversary, or a company owned or controlled by any such entity. State-managed funds are further prohibited from investing or depositing public funds in any bank domiciled or principally located within a foreign adversary. Any state-managed fund in violation of this bill is required to immediately begin divestment of any public holdings, to be fully divested within two years of the effective date of the bill. Within six months after the effective date of this bill, the State Treasurer must identify companies subject to these restrictions and distribute a list of these restricted companies to each state managed fund. Methods of gathering this information are specified in the bill. This bill is similar to HB 196 (2025) and 2143 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1669 Repeals the tax imposed on the sale of bingo cards
Sponsor Rep. Brian Seitz (R)
Summary
This bill repeals a two percent tax on the gross receipts of retail sales paid for each pull tab card sold in the State. The bill also repeals a tax imposed on each organization conducting a game of bingo which annually awards at least $5,000 and more than $100 in a single day. This bill is similar to HB 197 (2025) and HB 1427 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1670 Modifies provisions relating to income tax on tips
Sponsor Rep. Brian Seitz (R)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill allows taxpayers to subtract from their Federal adjusted gross income 100% of any tips received or paid to a tipped employee engaged in an occupation that customarily and regularly receives tips. This bill is the same as HB 198 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1689 Modifies certain provisions to include artificially generated visual depictions of a minor
Sponsor Rep. Scott Cupps (R)
Summary
Currently, the criminal offense for possession or distribution of child pornography includes visual depictions in photographs, films, videos, pictures, or computer-generated images that involve: (1) The production of such visual depiction in which a minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (2) The use of digital, computer, or computer-generated images that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (3) The creation, adaptation, or modification of a visual depiction that shows an identifiable minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction", as defined in the bill, to the definition of "child pornography". Currently, the definition of "material" in relation to pornography criminal offenses includes, but is not limited to, anything printed or written, pictures, drawings, photographs, films, videotapes or videotape productions, and pictorial representations. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction" to the definition. Currently, the definition of "explicit sexual material" in relation to explicit sexual material criminal offenses includes, but is not limited to, any pictorial, three-dimensional, or visual depictions. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction" to the definition. This bill is similar to HB 1689 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1698 Establishes antibullying requirements for school districts
Sponsor Rep. Mazzie Christensen (R)
Summary
This bill modifies Section 160.775, RSMo, and specifies that the section be known as "Sawyer's Law". The bill defines "act of school violence" or "violent behavior" the same as bullying and provides a definition for a "zero- tolerance disciplinary policy". The bill requires any school bullying policy to include a restriction on zero-tolerance disciplinary policies and a requirement for the school to consider if the student was responding to an act of school violence or violent behavior committed against the student. The bill requires charter schools to adopt and school districts to update current school bullying policies. Currently, employees who witness an incident of bullying must report the incident within two days. This bill lowers the reporting requirement to immediately upon the employee witnessing the incident and requires that all reported incidents be submitted in writing. Results of investigations must include a description of any interventions, initiatives, techniques, or discipline provided to all students involved on a standardized form developed by the district. The policy is required to outline a procedure for responding to an investigation that finds an act of bullying has occurred. The procedure must include notifying the parents or guardians of the bullied student and of the bullying student. If the investigation finds that the bullying meets the criteria of 2nd degree harassment, a referral must be sent to law enforcement, or to the Children's Division if the bullying student is under 11 years of age. Additionally, students committing acts of bullying must be included in educational trainings and prevention initiatives. The bill requires the policy to outline annual mandatory training for any district or charter school employee and volunteer that has contact with students; training on appropriate interventions and associated liability for action or inaction must be included in the training. This bill requires the school administration to report monthly to the school board or governing board all acts of bullying, discipline for bullying, and all other disciplinary referrals. The school board or governing board must review the monthly report in a closed meeting and address concerns related to reported incidents within 30 days. The bill provides immunity from liability for any school district or charter school employee and volunteer who intervenes in an incident of school violence, violent behavior, or criminal actions against any student that is a victim of bullying; the bill specifies that the employee must follow the proper procedure and act in good faith to intervene under the defense of justification provided under Chapter 563. The bill provides protection from civil liability for any school district or charter school for disciplinary actions if the procedures were properly followed and if a suit is brought the school may recoup attorney's fees if they prevail. This bill requires that for reporting requirements for mandated reporters under Section 210.115, bullying, incidents of school violence, and crime, are considered abuse and required to be reported, with protections provided for reporting compliance. The bill prevents a charter school from expelling or transferring a student out of the school solely due to reports of bullying. This bill is similar to HB 351 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/12/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB1701 Requires instruction in human growth and development in schools
Sponsor Rep. Mazzie Christensen (R)
Summary
This bill modifies the course materials and instruction relating to human sexuality to include, beginning in the 2026-27 school year, a human growth and development discussion. The bill requires districts and charter schools to require such instruction beginning in grade three and outlines requirements including requiring a high-definition ultrasound video of fetal development and the "Meet Baby Olivia" video, showing the process of fertilization and every stage of human development. The bill specifies that the Attorney General has standing to enforce the requirements and provides a cause of action for damages and relief. This bill is similar to HB 461 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1703 Modifies provisions relating to an income tax deduction for military members engaged in certain civilian federal service
Sponsor Rep. Mazzie Christensen (R)
Summary
This bill provides that beginning January 1, 2027, the income tax deduction for certain military pay must apply to compensation received while engaging in civilian Federal service, including certain civil service positions.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1704 Creates the Education Freedom Act and modifies provisions relating to the assessment of public elementary and secondary schools
Sponsor Rep. Mazzie Christensen (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Education Freedom Act" and creates and modifies provisions relating to the statewide assessment system, school accountability report cards, and the powers and duties of the State Board of Education (State Board). The bill repeals provisions of current law authorizing the State Board to develop a statewide assessment system and a standardized assessment instrument based on academic performance standards. Instead, the State Board will develop a statewide summative assessment system that satisfies the requirements of Federal law, and the State Board must use the results of the assessments only for the purpose of compliance with Federal law and the determination of performance districts in the calculation of State aid. The State Board must not use assessment results to classify school districts and charter schools. The bill repeals a provision of current law that the statewide assessment system will permit the academic performance of students in each school to be tracked only against prior academic performance in the same school. Under the bill, school districts and charter schools must create, purchase, or adopt a local assessment system that meets certain criteria outlined in the bill, including but not limited to, being related to curriculum taught in the school and being evaluated and graded in a manner that provides students and teachers with meaningful feedback. The bill repeals provisions relating to the State Board's authority to suggest criteria for a school to demonstrate that its students learn the knowledge, skills, and competencies measured by the statewide assessment system at exemplary levels. The bill further repeals provisions relating to "Outstanding Schools Waivers" that exempt certain schools from requirements relating to the authority of the State Board to classify school districts (Section 160.518). The bill repeals provisions requiring the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to produce a school accountability report card for each public school district, public school building, and charter school. Instead, school districts and charter schools must report certain information annually on a data dashboard on their website, and will separately share such information with DESE. The bill also repeals provisions relating to the identification of priority schools that fail to meet acceptable standards of student achievement, as well as repealing provisions relating to the identification of attendance centers that are categorized as requiring school improvement strategies. The bill repeals the requirement for school districts and charter schools to provide their school accountability report cards to legislators by December first annually, as well as the requirement for the State Board to approve the inclusion of charter school data in a school district's school accountability report card (Section 160.522). The bill modifies provisions of current law authorizing the State Board to classify public schools by specifying that these provisions will apply before the 2027-28 school year and again in the 2032-33 school year and subsequently. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year through the 2031-32 school year, the bill requires the State Board to identify a minimum of two national school accreditation agencies from which any school district can seek to obtain accreditation. Although the State Board can adopt a system of accreditation that school districts can choose to utilize, the State Board must accept any accreditation status a school district obtains from an approved national school accreditation agency, provided that the accreditation status is in accordance with the documented guidelines of such agency. However, the State Board will still determine whether a school district accredited by such an agency must be considered accredited, provisionally accredited, or unaccredited solely for the purposes of determining whether a charter school can be operated in the school district (Section 161.092). This bill is similar to SS#2 SB 360 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1707 Excludes certain processing fees from the definition of gross receipts for sales tax purposes
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Coleman (R)
Summary
HB 1707 -- CERTAIN PROCESSING FEES EXCLUDED FROM SALES TAX (Coleman) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Commerce This bill modifies the definition of "gross receipts" for the purposes of sales tax, to provide that charges incident to the extension of credit must include credit card and debit card processing fees.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB1718 Modifies provisions relating to limitations on awards for certain liability claims against public entities
Sponsor Rep. Dave Hinman (R)
Summary
HCS HB 1718 -- LIMITATIONS ON AWARDS FOR CERTAIN LIABILITY CLAIMS (Hinman) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Insurance This bill modifies section 537.610, RSMo, by specifying that the applicable liability limit for a claim against the State or political subdivision is the limit in effect on the date of the accident or occurrence giving rise to the claim.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/08/2026
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-General Laws

HB1722 Modifies the election date, terms of office, and term limits for members of school boards
Sponsor Rep. Richard West (R)
Summary
Currently, elections for school board members are held on either the general municipal election day or a day specified in the county charter. Such offices are for terms ranging from three years to six years, depending on the district. This bill requires such elections beginning in 2028 to be held at the November general election and makes school board terms two years, with no member serving more than eight years total. This bill also requires school board elections to be partisan and that board members of the special school district can serve a four-year term, rather than the current three-year term. This bill is similar to HB 539 (2025) and HB 2536 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1726 Requires every school district to comply with enhanced safety and security standards
Sponsor Rep. Mike Costlow (R)
Summary
This bill outlines safety and security measures for public school buildings and provides definitions for "bullet-resistant security laminate" and "riot-resistant security laminate" as a film resistant based on standards specified in the bill. The bill requires that all school districts implement safety and security compliance standards for all attendance centers. Access points must be secured by design, maintained to operate as intended, and appropriately monitored. Alphanumerical characters must be displayed on interior and exterior doors. Standards for primary entrances, construction of exterior doors and windows, and roof access doors are specified, as are standards for all ground-level windows, interior doors with access to gathering spaces, and locking mechanisms. Specified windows and doors must be covered in either bullet proof or riot proof laminate, as specified. School districts are required to conduct weekly inspections of exterior doors, report findings, and maintain certifications of compliance. These standards must be implemented beginning in the 2027-28 school year. Existing security laminate not compliant with standards must be upgraded by July 1, 2027, and school districts must have a contractor procured by this date to be in compliance. The bill creates the "School Safety and Security Matching Grant Program" to assist school districts in implementing safety and security projects. School districts can apply for matching grants to cover 50% of the project cost beginning in the 2027-28 school year; beginning July 1, 2028, districts can only use classroom trust fund proceeds for school safety provisions until the district is in compliance. Beginning July 1, 2030, noncompliance will result in a school district being classified as unaccredited by the State Board of Education. The Program and its provisions will automatically sunset six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 549 (2025) and HCS HB 1761 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1727 Modifies provisions relating to unlawful discriminatory practices
Sponsor Rep. Mike Costlow (R)
Summary
This bill updates the powers and duties of the Missouri Commission on Human Rights, Chapter 213, RSMo. This bill adds a definition for "color" to refer to a person's skin color, pigmentation, complexion, shade, or tone, regardless of race. In addition, this bill amends the definition of "discrimination" by: (1) Including unfair or differential treatment based upon a person's presumed or assumed color, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, or age as it relates to employment, disability, or familial status relating to housing; and (2) Repealing the word "race". This bill also repeals all references to race in relation to unlawful housing practice and discrimination in commercial real estate loans. This bill makes it an unlawful discriminatory practice for a public entity, as defined in the bill, or a private entity to discriminate against any person in the sourcing, bidding, procurement, offering, letting, or engagement of contracts because of color, religion, national origin, sex, ancestry, age, or disability of such person. The bill does not grant preferential treatment to any person because of color, religion, national origin, sex, ancestry, age or disability of such person. This bill allows the rejection of bids, the refusal to contract, or the termination of a contract if the decision is based upon legitimate factors. Under this bill, it is not an unlawful discriminatory practice for a public entity to comply with additional State or Federal requirements relating to contract procurement. The bill adds public entity and private entity to the list of individuals and entities that are prohibited from engaging in unlawful discriminatory practices under current law, and repeals references to race. This bill is similar to HB 1558 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1735 Modifies provisions of the "Rebuilding Communities and Neighborhood Preservation Act" to establish a tax credit for critical revitalization property
Sponsor Rep. Colin Wellenkamp (R)
Summary
This bill defines "critical revitalization area", "critical revitalization property", "eligible costs for critical revitalization properties" and "historic district". The bill provides that any taxpayer who incurs eligible costs for renovation of a critical revitalization property can receive a tax credit equal to 35% of the costs against his or her tax liability. This bill also sets $5,000 as the minimum eligible costs for renovation of a critical revitalization property and $100,000 as the maximum tax credit over any 10-year period. Currently, no tax credit is allowed to be issued for the construction or rehabilitation of rental property. This bill provides an exception for the renovation of rental property that qualifies as a critical revitalization property. Beginning January 1, 2027, tax credits are not allowed in an amount greater than $16 million each year. However, this bill provides that portions of that $16 million must be used for certain purposes. This bill provides that the Department of Economic Development must establish a tax credit application process for taxpayers who incurred eligible costs for the renovation of eligible critical revitalization property. This bill is similar to HB 1498 (3112H.01I) 2025.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1739 Modifies provisions relating to the "Missouri Working Family Tax Credit Act", making the tax credit refundable
Sponsor Rep. Kemp Strickler (D)
Summary
Currently, if the amount of a tax credit under the Missouri Working Family Tax Credit Act exceeds the tax liability, the difference must not be refunded to the taxpayer, and it must not be carried forward to any following tax year. This bill provides that, for all tax years beginning on and after January 1, 2027, tax credits issued under the provisions of this section must be refundable. This bill is similar to HB 1479 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1743 Modifies provisions governing the seizure of property for tax delinquencies
Sponsor Rep. Scott Miller (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits the seizure of certain property solely because the owner owes taxes on the property. The bill applies to only personal property that belongs to an individual or to certain limited liability companies (LLC), and to real property classified as residential and used as the owner's primary residence, including when the real property is held in the name of a LLC and is used for farming purposes. This bill is the same as HCS HB 1212 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Ways and Means

HB1744 Establishes a quality control committee for oversight and enacts education reforms
Sponsor Rep. Scott Miller (R)
Summary
This bill defines "educational entity" to include charter, public, private, home school, FPE school, virtual schools, and early childhood education services and "Key performance indicators" (KPI) as an indicators of success including, but not limited to, such accomplishments for graduates as showing up on time, being respectful and kind, and demonstration of initiative. The bill defines the mission of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to produce graduates who contribute positively to the economy and their communities and provides that all educational entities in the State share the mission. Entities must demonstrate the state mission in curricula and graduation requirements. High school graduates must meet all KPIs before receiving a diploma or high school equivalency certificate. The bill outlines duties that DESE has in connection with the implementation of a quality control system, policies and procedures for project implementation, and ensures that each educational entity providing early childhood education demonstrates KPI's into curricula and graduation requirements, among other duties outlined in the bill. The bill establishes in the Secretary of State's office the "Quality Control Committee for Oversight", comprised of nine members from specified departments, a State Representative appointed by the Speaker of the House, and a State Senator appointed by the President Pro Tem of the Senate. The terms of members and duties of the committee are outlined in the bill. The committee can establish a working group to assist the committee, comprised of full-time employees. Duties of the committee in relation to DESE's mission and the KPIs are provided in the bill and include responsibilities such as adjudicating challenges to school board rulings on courses offered and to challenge courses offered or actions taken by educational entities. The office of the Secretary of State must hold DESE responsible for graduates who fail to meet KPIs during school and up to five years after high school graduation; hold DESE and educational entities accountable for students failing to graduate on schedule, and hold parents accountable for students who cause repeated disruptions. The funding for the committee will be provided by an appropriation of money that was originally allocated for diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. This bill is similar to HB 1510 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1745 Modifies the minimum wage and overtime administrative complaint process, establishing additional requirements for employees filing certain employment complaints
Sponsor Rep. Scott Miller (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Commerce by a vote of 6 to 2. On or after January 1, 2027, an employee must file a complaint concerning minimum wage or overtime law violations, with the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, on a form and in the manner provided by the Department, within the time period specified in the bill, before filing a civil action. The employee must include all the pay periods relating to the alleged violations in the complaint, along with the supporting evidence or documentation that forms the basis of the complaint. All pay periods ending before the date the complaint is filed, that are not included as part of the complaint, are considered to be in compliance with the law and the employee waives any rights to file a future complaint relating to the omitted pay periods arising from the same violation, to the extent allowed by the Fair Labor Standards Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, or other Federal or State law or regulation. Upon receiving the complaint, the Department must investigate the allegations in the complaint and issue an investigative report including its findings of underpayment and liquidated damages. The Department must complete its investigation within 90 days after receiving the complaint. If the Department is unable to resolve the allegations in the complaint, or the employee is dissatisfied with the Department's findings, or the employee rejects the employer's settlement offer within the time frames indicated in the bill, the Department must issue a "right to sue" notice to the employee. The employee has 30 days from the date of receiving the notice to file a lawsuit in the circuit court. The bill includes time frames for the employer and employee to consider the offer of settlement and make a counteroffer after the Department issues its investigative report or before the "right to sue" notice is issued to the employee. If a valid settlement is reached between the employer and the employee, the Department must issue a notice of dismissal with prejudice, and the employee waives all rights to file a suit relating to the allegations in the complaint. An employer who is in violation of this bill is subject to penalties under the law, including fines, restitution, and other remedies approved by the court. An employee who files a lawsuit without first filing a complaint with the Department as indicated in the bill, will have the lawsuit dismissed without prejudice and will have to compensate the employer for all legal fees and costs as the court determines. If the employee files a lawsuit and receives a "right to sue" notice and the court finds that the damages awarded are equal to or less than the greater of the Department's finding or the employer's settlement offer, the employee will be responsible for paying the costs incurred by both the employee and the employer related to the suit. This bill is similar to HB 896 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill is a common sense bill and will benefit all parties. This bill will help protect businesses from predatory lawsuits by providing a way for this type of dispute to be settled before it goes to court. This bill will ensure that employees get paid what they deserve and save businesses money by not having to pay for court fees and punitive monies. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Miller; Missouri Insurance Coalition; and Missouri Civil Justice Reform Coalition, Inc. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill is not needed because it is already established in both Federal and State law. This bill could create even more claims against an employer because each pay violation would need it's own claim, thus creating more paperwork and expending state employee time logging the claim. This bill would limit the Department of Labor's ability to investigate because it limits them to investigate one claim at a time. This bill will force the Department to request more funding from the State to hire more employees and train them to take on this increased workload. Testifying in person against the bill were Michael Hodgson, Hodgson Law Firm. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Commerce

HB1746 Establishes the "AI Nonsentience and Responsibility Act"
Sponsor Rep. Scott Miller (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 10 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 1746 & 1769. This bill establishes the "AI Nonsentience and Responsibility Act". This bill defines "artificial intelligence" or "AI", "deployer", "developer", "emergent properties", and "end-user"; and removes definitions for "manufacturer" and "owner". The bill defines a "person" as a natural person or any entity recognized as having legal personhood under the laws of the State, explicitly excluding any AI system. This bill states that for all purposes under State law, AI systems must be declared to be nonsentient entities. As a result, no AI system will be granted the status of or recognized as any of the following: (1) A person, or any form of legal personhood, nor be considered to possess consciousness, self-awareness, or similar traits of living beings; (2) A spouse, domestic partner, or hold any personal legal status similar to a marriage. Any attempt to marry or create a personal union with an AI system will be void and hold no legal effect; (3) An officer, director, manager, or similar role within any corporation, partnership, or other legal entity. Any appointment of an AI system to such a role will be void and hold no legal effect; or (4) An owner, controller, or holder of title to any form of property, including real estate, intellectual property, financial accounts, and digital assets. All such assets associated with AI must be attributed to a human individual or a legally recognized organization that is responsible for the AI's development, deployment, or operation. Any harm caused by an AI system, when used as intended or misused, is the responsibility of the deployer or user who directed or employed the AI. A developer or deployers of AI may be held liable if harm is caused by a defect in design, construction, or instructions for use of the AI system. However, mere misuse or intentional wrongdoing by the user will not impute liability to the developer or deployer absent proof of negligence or design defects, nor will wrongdoing by the developer impute liability to the developer. In cases of negligence, the developer or deployer will be absolved of any criminal wrongdoing or punitive damages, provided that the standards established in this bill were followed. Developers and deployers of AI must maintain oversight and control over any AI system that could reasonably be expected to impact human welfare, property, or public safety. Failure to provide adequate supervision or safeguards may constitute negligence on the part of the deployer. Proper oversight is demonstrated by adherence to Missouri standards for AI risk management based on the National Institute of Standards and Technology, as described in the bill. This bill further states that an AI system is not an entity that is capable of bearing fault or liability in its own right. And any attempt to shift blame solely onto an AI system will be void, because liability will remain with human actors or entities in control of the AI system. Safety mechanisms designed to prevent harm to individuals or property must be prioritized by developers and deployers of AI systems. The mere labeling of an AI system as "aligned," "ethically trained," or "value locked" will not excuse the deployer's or developer's liability for harm caused. Developers remain responsible for demonstrating adequate safety features that are commensurate with the AI's level of potential harm. Deployers and developers of AI systems that cause significant bodily harm, death, or major property damage must promptly notify the relevant authorities and comply with any subsequent investigations. A developer or deployer that has formally adopted a policy to comply with the provisions of this bill before August 28, 2026, will not be subject to the requirements of this bill before March 1, 2027. This bill is similar to HB 1462 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that as technology advances at a fast rate, it is important that we make sure that AI is not in any way regarded as something like a human or person. Supporters further state that people can easily mistake AI-generated content for something they believe to be real. Because of the fast rate of expansion of this new technology, our proper usage of it is likely far behind our actual understanding of the dangers and consequences. Supporters also state that the provisions of this bill are a necessary proactive step to regulate AI. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Miller; Elizabeth Kayser, Kayser And Associates LLC. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/30/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB1748 Adds provisions including gifted education pupil count for purposes of funding schools through the foundation formula
Sponsor Rep. Scott Miller (R)
Summary
For purposes of school funding, this bill defines "gifted education pupil count", as the number of pupils who qualify as gifted, as gifted children are defined in Section 162.675, RSMo, and who are enrolled and have participated in a State-approved gifted education program provided by the school district by June 1st of the immediately preceding school year. Beginning on July 1, 2027, State funding for public schools will include in the calculation for weighted average daily attendance and weighted membership, the product of six-tenths multiplied by the number of the district's gifted education pupil count. This bill is similar to HB 1473 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB1749 Creates provisions relating to veteran preferences for contracts
Sponsor Rep. Scott Miller (R)
Summary
HB 1749 -- VETERAN PREFERENCES FOR CONTRACTS (Miller) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces This bill requires all agencies, departments, institutions and other entities of this State and of each political subdivision to give a three-point bonus preference to honorably discharged veteran owned enterprises that conduct business in Missouri, or that maintain offices or places of business in Missouri, for contracts for the performance of any job or service. Currently, there is a three-point bonus preference for being a service-disabled veteran business. This bill specifies that a business cannot receive points for being a service-disabled veteran and for being an honorably discharged veteran owned enterprise. The business can only be awarded points for one qualifier or the other. This bill is similar to HB 714 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Veterans and Military Affairs

HB1757 Establishes procedures for school districts to test for gifted students
Sponsor Rep. Brenda Shields (R)
Summary
HCS HB 1757 -- TESTING OF GIFTED STUDENTS (Shields) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education This bill requires school districts beginning in the 2027-28 school year to provide universal screenings for all students at least once before 3rd grade for the purpose of identifying potential gifted students. The bill outlines the screening requirements that provide a body of current, valid, and reliable evidence gathered from a minimum of two areas outlined in the bill. The screening must be reviewed by at least three staff members trained in testing, administration, or gifted education. A child not meeting the criteria on a single screening does not prevent the child from being identified as gifted. The bill requires districts to establish a process for the universal screenings, annual notification to parents, and the identification of students for gifted programs using criteria recommended by the Advisory Council on the Education of Gifted and Talented Children and the State Board of Education.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB1759 Modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments
Sponsor Rep. Mike McGirl (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 12 to 7. Currently, personal property is assessed at 33.3% of its true value in money as of January 1st of each calendar year. Beginning January 1, 2027, personal property must be assessed at 30% of its true value in money. This bill is similar to HB 629 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill will give taxpayers relief by reducing the assessment rate. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Mcgirl; Associated Industries of Missouri; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the bill will shift the tax burden to every homeowner and every business in the taxing jurisdiction, and they cannot afford this change. Testifying in person against the bill was Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessors Association. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/26/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB1760 Provides a sales tax exemption for sales of certain medical devices
Sponsor Rep. Mike McGirl (R)
Summary
Current law provides a sales tax exemption for certain durable medical equipment as defined on January 1, 1980, by the federal Medicare program. This bill removes the reference to January 1, 1980. Additionally, current law provides a sales tax exemption for the sales or rental of manual and powered wheelchairs, including parts. The bill also applies the exemption to accessories for such wheelchairs. This bill is the same as HB 653 (2025) and HB 1817 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1761 Repeals the tax imposed on the sale of bingo cards
Sponsor Rep. Mike McGirl (R)
Summary
This bill repeals a 2% tax on the gross receipts of retail sales paid on each pull tab card sold in the State. The bill also repeals a tax imposed on each organization conducting a game of bingo which annually awards at least $5,000, and more than $100 in a single day. This bill is similar to HB 48 (2025) and HB 1427 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1762 Modifies provisions relating to income tax deductions for private pensions
Sponsor Rep. Mike McGirl (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Pensions by a vote of 8 to 4. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 1762 & 2059. This bill increases the maximum amount to be subtracted from a taxpayer's adjusted gross income for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, to the first $12,000 of any retirement allowance received from any privately funded sources. The current maximum is $6,000. The following limits on a taxpayer's adjusted gross income in order to be entitled to the above maximum exemption are also increased for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027: (1) Single, Head of Household -- increases from $24,999 to $49,999; (2) Married Filing Combined -- increases from $31,999 to $63,999; and (3) Married Filing Separate -- increases from $15,999 to $32,599 This bill is similar to HB 44 (2025) and HB 2657 (2024). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that a couple of years ago public pensions were exempted, and now it is time for private pensions to enjoy the very same exemptions. This bill is beneficial because it expands the income thresholds for eligibility, allowing more people to take advantage. As a result, this bill would treat all pension holders equally, regardless of where they work. If the people have additional money they can spend it. Several states do not tax the private pension portion. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Mcgirl OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/01/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB1766 Modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments
Sponsor Rep. Mike McGirl (R)
Summary
HB 1766 -- PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS (McGirl) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Property Tax Reform Currently, local county assessors determine the value of new construction and improvements of both real and personal property by maintaining a yearly record of increases in valuation for each political subdivision in the county that results from new construction or improvements. The aggregate increase in valuation of personal property for the current year over that of the previous year is the equivalent of the new construction and improvements factor for personal property. Beginning January 1, 2027, any increase in the aggregate valuation of personal property for the current year over that of the previous year cannot be counted as new construction. This bill is similar to HB 629 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
HB1767 Enacts the Missouri Educators and Parental Empowerment and Rights Act
Sponsor Rep. Ed Lewis (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 14 to 0 with 1 member voting present. This bill establishes the "Missouri Educators and Parental Empowerment and Rights Act" which recognizes the profound effect parents and teachers have on the educational success of Missouri's children and the important role that education plays in our preservation of rights and liberties. The bill also includes the "Parents' Bill of Rights" and the "Educators' Bill of Rights", which outline specific rights for parents of school children including but not limited to: having knowledge of what is being taught; viewing, and upon request, receiving copies of school records; and being informed about the child's safety. Educator rights include, but are not limited to: freedom from student abuse; classroom preparation time during contract hours; and to teach in a safe, secure, and orderly environment. The bill requires school districts and charter schools in the State to develop policies and procedures to foster and maintain collaboration between parents and teachers and enumerate parental rights and educator rights. Policies include notification to parents of serious disciplinary incidents and procedures for parental visits during school hours. Additionally, the bill provides that policies and procedures be published on the school website and teachers, school administrators, parents, and students be informed of their rights. The bill outlines a student code of conduct that will set forth expectations for behavior consistent with ethical responsibility, community standards, and respect for school authority. The code of conduct must include: high expectations of personal responsibility; encouraging students to uphold traditional values such as honesty, diligence, and civility; measures to address and correct disruptive behavior; and clearly prohibit any policy or program that differentiates treatment of students primarily on the basis of race or other immutable characteristics, ensuring that all disciplinary measures are applied equally and fairly to every student. School counselors and other qualified personnel must offer interventions that emphasize respect for others, problem solving, and perseverance. School boards and charter schools must adopt board policies by the beginning of the 2027-28 school year, as outlined in the bill. The bill requires that schools must make efforts to facilitate parental engagement through regular communication, opportunities for parents to review the policy handbook, and the provision of resources that support ethical responsibility and community standards at home. Schools also must ensure that teachers and staff are trained to maintain order, encourage compliance, foster civility, and encourage personal responsibility. This bill is similar to HCS HB 1287 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill brings forward specific rights for teachers and parents and helps bridge the gap to ensure that both have a profound and important role in student education. Student behavior is a primary contributor to teachers leaving the profession and this language would help codify specific professional rights. Additional work in the direction of enshrining student's rights to learn and be held to high standards is something to consider. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Lewis; Missouri State Teachers Association; and Missouri National Education Association; OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that granting rights in statute should be done cautiously as administration and legal costs may rise as a result. Having cultural concerns be addressed in local schools from a state level down can be problematic. Testifying in person on the bill was Missouri Council Of School Administrators. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026

HB1768 Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property used for short-term rentals
Sponsor Rep. Chris Brown (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 1768 & 2060 -- CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL REAL PROPERTY (Brown) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Property Tax Reform Currently, real property is divided into three separate classifications based on the use or purpose of the property. Each of the subclassifications of property are assessed at different rates. When real property is used for different purposes resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money of the property devoted to each use. This bill provides that when a single family home that is owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC) is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, the home will be classified as residential property and will not necessarily be considered "transient housing". This bill is similar to SCS HB 1086 (2025) and SCS HB 1086 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review

HB1770 Modifies the time limitations for prosecutions for abuse or neglect of a child
Sponsor Rep. Phil Amato (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Children and Families by a vote of 15 to 0. This bill requires prosecutions for abuse or neglect of a child be commenced within 10 years of the victim's 18th birthday. This bill is similar to HCS HB 401 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill gives victims the time to mature and that the wheels of justice are the slowest moving wheels there are. There is a significant gap in protection and proving physical abuse is much more difficult than sexual abuse. The current statute of limitations on non-sexual abuse is only three years, which ties the hands of prosecutors and law enforcement. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Amato; Edward C. Herwig Jr; Allen Coggins; Missouri Network of Child Advocacy Centers; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/02/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB1774 Authorizes a tax credit for certain charitable donations to local hospital foundations
Sponsor Rep. Phil Amato (R)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill authorizes a tax credit for local hospital foundation donations. A qualified taxpayer may claim a tax credit in an amount equal to 50% of the value of his or her donations made to a local hospital foundation. The amount of the credit claimed must not exceed $2,500 per taxpayer per year. The cumulative amount of tax credits allowed to all taxpayers cannot exceed $2 million per calendar year. This program sunsets six years after its effective date. This bill modifies the "Tax Credit Accountability Act of 2004" by updating the definitions of "Business recruitment tax credits", "Domestic and social tax credits", and "Training and educational tax credits". This bill is similar to HB 364 (2025)and HB 1731(2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1776 Provides matching grant moneys to assist school districts with school renovation projects
Sponsor Rep. Phil Amato (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Vernon Sullivan Memorial School Renovation Grant" and the "School Renovation Projects Matching Grant" program. Beginning in the 2026-27 school year and subject to appropriations, this program provides school districts an opportunity to apply for a matching grant for "eligible projects"; such projects must be related to installation, repair, or renovation of roofing, heating, ventilation, air conditioning, windows, or other related school health or environmental improvements. The bill specifies the application and notification process and authorizes the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to review applications and determine grant recipients. The Department may assign priority status to districts that demonstrate the need for school renovation projects. The Department must rank applications and establish a priority score as specified in the bill, with facility destruction, district growth, and equalized assessed valuation per pupil as contributing factors. These provisions sunset six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 391 (2025).
Progress
House: 3rd Reading
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1777 Modifies categories of recipients that participate in tax increment financing
Sponsor Rep. Phil Amato (R)
Summary
Currently, a tax increment financing (TIF) redevelopment plan or project adopted to address an economically blighted area must appropriate certain percentages of new state revenue that such a plan or project generates. Beginning January 1, 2027, for TIF redevelopment plans and projects adopted or projects approved by ordinance, up to 50% of new state revenue must be deposited into a separate, segregated account. The funds must then be distributed to any neighborhood improvement district, ambulance district, fire district, library district, or school district found within the local political subdivision in which TIF revenues had been realized by the taxing of each lot, block, tract, or parcel of real estate within the project area This bill is similar to HB 574 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1778 Establishes the "Missouri Religious Freedom Protection Act"
Sponsor Rep. Cathy Jo Loy (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 8 to 4. This bill establishes the "Missouri Religious Freedom Protection Act". The bill specifies that no public official can issue an order that has the effect of limiting or prohibiting a religious group or place of worship from holding religious services or meetings. The prohibition does not apply to religious groups using places of worship to intentionally commit or plan acts of violence. This prohibition is not to be interpreted to exempt places of worship from complying with applicable building and fire codes. This bill is similar to HB 75 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will clarify constitutionally protected religious rights. Supporters further state that without this clarification, faith communities would be subject to local officials having the ability to prevent church services or gatherings. This bill would serve as a preemptive measure to ensure that COVID-like policies will not happen again, in which churches were ordered not to conduct regular services. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Loy; Arnie Dienoff; and Americans For Prosperity. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill would go too far in its objectives, primarily because it would effectively tie the hands of public health officials whose job it is to protect all citizens, especially during a pandemic. Opponents further state that courts already serve as a check against overreach when local officials pass unneeded laws, rules, or regulations, and churches should not receive a special exemption. Testifying in person against the bill were American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri; and Brian Kaylor, Word&Way. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/26/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB1782 Removes the sunset provisions of the "Donated Food" food pantry tax credit
Sponsor Rep. John Voss (R)
Summary
This bill repeals the sunset on the existing food pantry tax credit, which is set to expire on December 31, 2026.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Ways and Means

HB1784 Changes the definition of "qualified student" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program
Sponsor Rep. John Voss (R)
Summary
This bill modifies the definition of a "qualified student" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship program. Currently, an elementary or secondary school student who is a resident of the state can qualify if he or she is a member of a household whose total annual income does not exceed an amount equal to 300% of the income standard used to qualify for free and reduced price lunches and he or she: attended a public school for one semester during the previous 12 months, is eligible to begin kindergarten or 1st grade, or is a sibling of a scholarship recipient. This bill allows an elementary or secondary school student who is a resident of the state to qualify if he or she is a member of a household whose total annual income does not exceed an amount equal to 300% of the income standard used to qualify for free and reduced price lunches, without the additional requirements described above. This bill is similar to HB 519 (2025) and HB 1801(2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/22/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB1785 Modifies provisions relating to an income tax credit for contributions to pregnancy resource centers
Sponsor Rep. John Voss (R)
Summary
Currently, a taxpayer may be allowed a tax credit in an amount equal to 70% of a contribution to a pregnancy resource center. Beginning January 1, 2027, the tax credit increases to 100% of the contribution. This bill is similar to HB 1176 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/26/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Ways and Means

HB1787 Requires public schools to establish the general municipal election day and the general election day as a school holiday
Sponsor Rep. Jamie Gragg (R)
Summary
This bill requires that, beginning with the 2026-27 school year, school districts and charter schools must set the general municipal and general election day as a school holiday and not be in session. This bill is similar to HB 1623 (2024) and HB 556 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/03/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Elections

HB1788 Modifies requirements for campaign contributions
Sponsor Rep. Jim Murphy (R)
Summary
HCS HB 1788 -- CAMPAIGN FINANCE (Murphy) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elections This bill requires all solicitations for campaign contributions to state, in a clear and conspicuous manner, the committee that will benefit from the contribution. The solicitation must also indicate what percentage of the contribution will be received by the committee, and any other entity that will receive any part of the contribution. The bill allows the solicitation of automatically-recurring contributions only if the contributor gives affirmative consent for the recurring contribution. The passive action of a contributor, including but not limited to failing to uncheck a prechecked box, does not constitute affirmative consent. This bill requires committees soliciting recurring contributions to provide receipts to the contributors, the contents of which are specified in the bill, and to immediately cancel the recurring contributions upon request. Any committee that solicits and receives a contribution in violation of this bill must return the contribution to the donor immediately. The bill allows the Missouri Ethics Commission to impose a civil penalty on a committee violating the provisions of this bill of up to 100 times the amount of the contribution received in violation of these provisions. The bill requires recurring contributions to expire automatically after the election at which the candidate or measure benefiting from the contribution appears on the ballot. Recurring contributions made to a candidate who wins a primary election can continue until the general election.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB1790 Modifies provisions relating to tax levies by political subdivisions
Sponsor Rep. Jim Murphy (R)
Summary
HCS HB 1790 -- TAX LEVIES BY POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS (Murphy) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Government Efficiency This bill requires that the election authority for a political subdivision or special district label taxation-related ballot measures numerically or alphabetically. Ballot measures will not be labeled in any other descriptive manner. The bill requires that any ballot measure that seeks approval to add, change, or modify a tax on real property use language to express the effect of the proposed change in terms of real dollars owed per $100,000 of a property's market valuation. This bill requires that if voters in a political subdivision approve a levy increase prior to the expiration of a previously approved temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling will remain in effect only until the temporary levy increase expires under the terms originally approved by voters. At that time, the tax rate ceiling will be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase unless voters of the political subdivision are asked to approve an additional permanent increase, the ballot language makes clear that the temporary levy increase is being made permanent, and such increase is approved. The bill requires that when voters in a political subdivision pass a tax rate increase, the political subdivision must use the current tax rate ceiling and the increase approved by the voters in establishing the rates of levy for the tax year immediately following the election. If the assessed valuation of real property in a political subdivision sees a reduction in value in the tax year immediately following the election, the political subdivision may raise its tax rates so that the revenue received from the local real property tax rates equals the amount the political subdivision would have received from the increased rates of levy had there been no reduction in the assessed valuation of real property in the political subdivision. In the event of an increased tax rate ceiling, such rate must be revenue neutral as required in Article X, Section 22 of the Constitution of Missouri. This bill is similar to HCS HB 119 (2025) and HCS HB 1517 (2024).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/04/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Local Government, Elections, and Pensions

HB1792 Establishes the Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Act
Sponsor Rep. Jim Murphy (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Children and Families by a vote of 15 to 0. This bill establishes the "Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Act". The bill defines "media literacy" to include concepts such as, but not limited to: an individual's ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and participate with all forms of media, including news in print and social media content, and recognize bias and stereotypes in media, as well as Internet safety. This bill requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to establish a "Media Literacy and Critical Thinking" Pilot Program for the 2027-28 and 2028-29 school years. Between five and seven diverse schools will be selected by DESE to participate in the Pilot Program as specified in the bill. The Program will address media literacy, develop strategies for student learning in classroom curricula, and demonstrate various literacy strategies used. Pilot Program schools must provide a report to DESE before August 1, 2029, and before January 1, 2030, DESE must compile and submit a summary report to the General Assembly. The Pilot Program terminates June 30, 2029. This section expires December 31, 2029. This bill is similar to HB 1513 (2024) and HB 116 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that something must be done to help the children manage the way that they receive information in the new digital age. Students need to learn that what they see and hear is being shown to them in order to influence them one way or another. This would be a pilot program with the purpose of teaching our children to internalize critical thinking. The ability to verify information is what?s important. This bill is sorely needed. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Murphy; Missouri State Teachers Association; Missouri National Education Association; Arnie Dienoff; and Missouri Press Association. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/26/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB1799 Authorizes taxpayers to submit petitions to reduce local tax rate levies
Sponsor Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Taxation Oversight and Reduction Act". A taxpayer may submit a petition to the local election authority with jurisdiction over a political subdivision for the reduction of the political subdivision's property tax rate, excluding any tax rate set to pay for bonds or debt services. Petitioners must notify the political subdivision's local election authority of their intent to submit a petition and provide the local election authority with a copy of the petition. Upon notification, the local election authority must notify the taxpayer of the minimum required number of signatures to approve the petition, the estimated cost for signature verification, and the date by which the petition will be due in order for the question to be placed on the ballot. The minimum signature requirement to place a tax reduction on the ballot will be 5% percent of the number of registered voters who voted in the most recent election of the political subdivision's governing body. The local election authority must verify that signatures are from registered voters of the political subdivision in question. Election authorities may charge petitioners a fee for signature verification, provided that the fee does not exceed $0.50 per signature. If petitioners meet all requirements, the local election authority will place the tax reduction on the ballot of the next general municipal election. The form of the ballot question is specified in the bill. If a majority of the registered voters of the political subdivision approve the reduction, the political subdivision must reduce the property tax rate by the percentage approved by the voters. The reduction must not exceed 5% of the tax rate in effect on the day the question is submitted to voters, unless the maximum authorized levy is more than 5% higher than the current tax rate ceiling, in which case the reduction may be equal to the percentage necessary to reduce the maximum authorized levy to equal the tax rate ceiling. A reduction of the same political subdivision's property tax rate may be submitted to voters no more than once every four years. This bill is similar to HB 515 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1800 Changes the percentage of the cap on the inflationary growth factor for the assessment growth of real or personal property occurring within a political subdivision, defines assessment value, and adds provisions related to the sales ratio studies performed by the State Tax Commission
Sponsor Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R)
Summary
HB 1800 -- REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS(Matthiesen) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Tax Reform This bill provides a definition for "assessment value" as it relates to real property assessment purposes (Section 137.016, RSMo). The bill modifies the manner in which a political subdivision can revise each tax levy to allow for inflationary assessment growth for all subclasses of real and personal property. Currently, the inflationary growth factor for any subclass of real and personal property is limited to the actual assessment growth, exclusive of new construction and improvements, but not to exceed the Consumer Price Index, or 5%, whichever is lower. This bill limits the inflationary growth factor for any subclass of real or personal property to the actual assessment growth, but not to exceed the lower of the following: (1) The Consumer Price Index; or (2) The following percentages: (a) For tax levy revisions before January 1, 2027, 5%; or (b) For tax levy revisions on or after January 1, 2027, 3% (Section 137.073). The bill provides that, for the purpose of equalizing the valuation of real property and tangible personal property among counties, the State Tax Commission must use ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass of property is valued below or above its true value in money. A class or subclass of property must be considered below or above its true value in money if the weighted mean ratio is less than 70% or greater than 100% (Section 138.390). This bill is similar to HB 517 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
HB1801 Changes the definition of "qualified student" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program
Sponsor Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R)
Summary
This bill modifies the definition of a "qualified student" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship program. Currently, an elementary or secondary school student who is a resident of the state can qualify for the program if he or she is a member of a household whose total annual income does not exceed an amount equal to 300% of the income standard used to qualify for free and reduced price lunches and he or she: attended a public school for one semester during the previous 12 months, is eligible to begin kindergarten or 1st grade, or is a sibling of a scholarship recipient. This bill allows an elementary or secondary school student who is a resident of the state to qualify if he or she is a member of a household whose total annual income does not exceed an amount equal to 300% of the income standard used to qualify for free and reduced price lunches, without the additional requirements described above. This bill is similar to HB 1784 (2026) and HB 519 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1816 Modifies provisions relating to an income tax credit for contributions to pregnancy resource center
Sponsor Rep. Christopher Warwick (R)
Summary
Currently, a taxpayer can be allowed a tax credit in an amount equal to 70% of a contribution to a pregnancy resource center. Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill would increase the tax credit to 100% of the contribution. This bill is similar to HB 1176 2025 .
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1818 Creates provisions relating to regulation of online content involving minors
Sponsor Rep. Becky Laubinger (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Children and Families by a vote of 17 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1818. The bill defines "content creator" as an individual who creates an image, audio content, or video content in exchange for compensation. A content creator includes, but is not limited to: vloggers, podcasters, social media influencers, or streamers. Under the bill, "restricted material" is defined as any material that is obscene, or depicts explicit sexual material, nudity, and sexually explicit conduct, as such terms are defined under Missouri statutes. The definition of "social media platform" is an internet-based service or application that has account holders in Missouri and meets the criteria detailed in the bill. A minor is engaged in the work of content creation when the following criteria are met at any time during the previous twelve-month period: (1) At least 30% of the content creator?s compensated image, audio content, or video content produced within a 30-day period includes the likeness, name or photograph of the minor; (2) The number of views received per image, audio segment, or video content segment on any social media platform meets the social media platform's threshold to generate compensation or the content creator received actual compensation per image, audio segment, or video segment equal to or greater than 10 cents per view; and (3) The content creator received actual compensation for image, audio segment, or video content of at least $25,000 during the prior 12-month period A minor who is over the age of 13 can produce, create, and publish his or her own content and will be entitled to all compensation from the content. Any content creator whose content features a minor engaged in content creation must maintain certain records, as provided in the bill, and retain the records until the minor reaches the age of 21. The content creator must provide notice to the minor of the existence of the records which are to be readily available to the minor. A minor who is engaged in the work of content creation will be compensated by the content creator. The content creator will set aside gross earnings, as specified in the bill, on any content including, but not limited to, the likeness or name of the minor in a trust account to be preserved for the benefit of the minor upon the minor reaching 18 years of age. After August 28, 2026, any individual who was featured in a content creator's post on a social media platform as a minor, can request that the content creator delete or edit the post to remove any content involving the minor. The content creator must delete or edit the post if the information provided by the individual is uniquely identifiable information. Social media platforms will provide an easily accessible mechanism through which the individual can submit a request for the removal of the content featuring the minor. Social media platforms will notify the content creator within a reasonable time period, but no longer than 30 days, after receiving a removal request. The content creator will delete or edit the post from the social media platform within 72 hours after receiving a notice of removal request from the social media platform. If the content creator fails to delete or edit the post involving the minor within 30 days after receiving the notice of removal request, the social media platform must take all reasonable steps to remove or edit the content involving the minor, subject to certain exceptions, as provided in the bill. Under the bill, it is unlawful to financially benefit from intentionally or knowingly producing or distributing on social media any restricted material, involving a minor, subject to certain exceptions provided in the bill. A social media platform will develop and implement a strategy to help mitigate risks related to monetization of restricted material involving minors. Requirements of the strategy are specified in the bill. Any individual can report violations of the bill to the Attorney General. If the Attorney General finds that provisions of the bill have been violated, the Attorney General is authorized to bring a civil action. Nothing in the bill precludes an individual from bringing a private civil action for any violations of the bill. This bill is similar to HB 1245 (2025) and SB 756 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that children are increasingly being featured in monetized social media content, and don't have the same forms of safeguards that children in acting do. This is an important update to our laws in the age of digital content and online content creation. Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Laubinger. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/12/2026
H - ** REVISED for TIME and LOCATION ** - 5/13/26 - 9:30 am - HR 1 - House-Rules-Legislative

HB1819 Establishes provisions relating to child care facilities
Sponsor Rep. Becky Laubinger (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Children and Families by a vote of 12 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1819. This bill requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to establish the following for any licensed child care facility: (1) Training and rules for non-restrained safe sleep policies for children one year of age or older and children with special needs. These policies must include safety procedures for the use of weighted blankets, and prohibit such use on any child under one year of age. Additionally, no weighted blanket used in a child care facility can exceed five pounds. (2) Safe rest options for non-napping children, which must include an option for non-restrained quiet play activities or other supervised activities; and (3) A care plan for children with special needs. "Special Needs" means special physical, developmental, or behavioral needs. This care plan must be reviewed, agreed upon, signed, and annually re- evaluated by the child's parents or legal guardians, the child care facility owner or director, the child's primary care provider, and any staff member directly responsible for the care of the child. The bill provides that any child care facility caring for a child with "special needs", as that term is defined in the bill, must complete at least one hour of training related to special needs care. All staff members responsible for a special needs child must complete training specifically related to the needs of a child with that diagnosis. This training can count toward the required annual training hours as part of the licensed child care provider hours of training. The provisions of this bill do not apply to children under one year of age, as existing statute governs provisions relating to safe sleep policies for children under one year of age. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that our state statutes regarding nap time safety in childcare facilities have gaps that need to be closed. There is opportunity to provide better guidance, training, and safety for licensed childcare facilities. This legislation does not create unnecessary burdens, it creates necessary protections. Training makes a significant difference when dealing with different kinds of children. The rules this bill creates are realistic. This is common sense prevention and we must protect our children. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Laubinger; Arnie Dienoff; Heather Noll; and Kids Win Missouri. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/28/2026
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB1826 Modifies provisions relating to epinephrine delivery systems
Sponsor Rep. Terri Violet (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 1826, 2560, 2349 & 2194 -- EPINEPHRINE DELIVERY SYSTEMS (Violet) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Health and Mental Health This bill changes the term "epinephrine auto-injector" to "epinephrine delivery system" throughout statute, defined as a single-use device or system used for the delivery of a premeasured dose of epinephrine into the human body. The bill adds epinephrine delivery systems to provisions of statute that permit the possession and self-administration of the medication to treat a student's chronic health condition, such as asthma or anaphylaxis. This bill authorizes each board of education in this State to grant permission to pupils, as well as each school board in this State to grant permission to school nurses to use this medication. The bill additionally modifies existing provisions for epinephrine possession, use limitations, and stock supply by adding epinephrine delivery systems as eligible products in nursing homes and facilities, as well as child care facilities, to the list of authorized entities. Current law authorizes qualified first responders, as defined in the bill, to administer epinephrine auto-injectors to a person who is suffering from an apparent anaphylactic reaction. This bill extends that authorization to epinephrine delivery systems. This bill is similar to HB 553 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB1839 Establishes provisions relating to civil liability for publishing or distributing material harmful to minors on the internet
Sponsor Rep. Sherri Gallick (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 1839, 2921 & 3015 -- AGE VERIFICATION ON ADULT WEBSITES This bill requires any commercial entity that publishes material online, of which at least 33% is sexual material harmful to minors, as defined in the bill, to use a third party to verify that any person attempting to access the material is at least 18 years old. The third party is prohibited from retaining any identifying information of the individual. The bill does not apply to bona fide news or public interest broadcasts or other media and will not affect the rights of a news-gathering organization, as defined in the bill. The Attorney General will enforce the provisions of the bill. If the Attorney General believes that a violation occurred and an action is in the public interest, the Attorney General can commence an action. If the court finds that a violation occurred, the court can grant relief. The civil penalty awards are specified in the bill.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/09/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

HB1841 Modifies provisions relating to sports officials, including civil liability protections and classification as special victims for criminal assault
Sponsor Rep. Sherri Gallick (R)
Summary
This bill states that sports officials, as defined in the bill, who officiate athletic contests at any level of competition will not be held liable for injuries or damages related to officiating duties unless such actions are intentional, willful, wanton, reckless, malicious, or grossly negligent. This bill also expands the term "special victim" to include a trained and certified sports official who is assaulted during the course of performing his or her duties or as a result of such duties.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1845 Establishes the Missouri Angel Investment Incentive Act
Sponsor Rep. Sherri Gallick (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Commerce by a vote of 7 to 0. This bill creates the "Missouri Angel Investment Incentive Act". For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this bill allows an investor to claim a tax credit in an amount equal to 40% of the investor?s investment in the qualified securities of a qualified Missouri business, or 50% of the investor's investment if the qualified Missouri business is located in a rural county. If the amount of the tax credit exceeds the investor?s tax liability in any one tax year, the credit may be carried forward for up to five subsequent tax years. No investor will receive more than $75,000 in tax credits in a single year for contributions to a single qualified Missouri business, or receive more than $300,000 in tax credits in total in a single tax year. A tax credit may be transferred by a qualified investor. The total amount of tax credits authorized in a single tax year by the Missouri Technology Corporation (MTC) must not exceed $6 million for the 2027 and 2028 calendar years. Thereafter, the maximum amount of tax credits that may be authorized will be increased annually by 20%, provided that the maximum amount of tax credits was authorized in the previous year. To be designated as a qualified Missouri business, a business must apply to the MTC, as specified in the bill. The designation of a business as a qualified Missouri business will be made annually by the MTC. In addition to other requirements specified in the bill, a qualified Missouri business must not have had annual gross revenues of more than $5 million in the most recent tax year of the business, and the business must not have been in operation longer than five years if the business is not a bioscience business, or longer than 10 years if the business is a bioscience business. Each business that has been allocated tax credits by the MTC must submit a report containing certain information to the MTC before the tax credits are issued. The State of Missouri will not be held liable for any damages to an investor that makes an investment in any qualified security of a qualified Missouri business, any business that applies to be a qualified Missouri business but is turned down, or any investor that makes an investment in a business that applies to be a qualified Missouri business but is turned down. The MTC must annually review the activities undertaken by this bill to ensure compliance. If the MTC determines that a business is not in substantial compliance, it may inform the business that the business will lose its designation if it does not come into compliance within 120 days. If the business does not come into compliance, the MTC may revoke its designation. If a business loses its designation as a qualified Missouri business, it will be precluded from being allocated any additional tax credits. However, investors in such a business will be entitled to keep all of the tax credits properly issued prior to the loss of designation by the business. The MTC must report certain information annually to the Department of Economic Development, the Governor, the President Pro Tem of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. This act expires on December 31, 2033. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will help encourage angel investors to invest in new and growing Missouri businesses. As a result of a small business receiving funds from an angel investor more jobs will be created, innovation will grow, and it will positively impact the long-term growth of Missouri's economy. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Gallick; City of Kansas City; Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce; Civic Council of Greater Kansas City; Missouri Chamber of Commerce & Industry; Greater StL Inc; and Ben Johnson, Next Missouri. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/26/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Commerce

HB1846 Establishes the "Sudden Cardiac Arrest Screening Act"
Sponsor Rep. Sherri Gallick (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Sudden Cardiac Arrest Screening Act". The bill requires that beginning in the 2027-28 school year the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education in collaboration with the Department of Health and Senior Services and the Missouri State High School Activities Association(MSHSAA) develop and distribute education materials on sudden cardiac arrest, including diseases that can cause it, the nature and warning signs of a cardiac arrest, and the risk associated with participation in athletic activity. The bill requires educational materials to be distributed during a student athlete's preparticipation physical examination and requires a signed acknowledgment of the receipt and review of the educational materials by the student athlete and the athlete's parent or guardian before participation in athletic activity. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year coaches for athletic activities must complete a cardiac arrest training course provided by MSHSAA or a qualified provider. Qualified medical professionals that perform physical examinations for student athletes must include a cardiovascular prescreening as part of the examination. The bill outlines key pediatric cardiovascular prescreening elements, including a targeted personal and family history along with a focused physical examination. Any athlete with a positive finding in the prescreening will be referred to a cardiologist for additional evaluation and testing. The bill requires that such prescreening take place within the three months before the student athletes athletic activity. The Department of Health and Senior Services must compile and publish on its website an annual report containing the total number of exams and the number of referrals that were made and include additional statistics specified in the bill. The bill also requires that the qualified medical professionals performing physical exams of student athletes receive continuing education, as specified in the bill, implemented by the State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts and the Missouri State Board of Nursing, within the Department of Professional Registration.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1849 Modifies the duration of unemployment benefits based on the unemployment rate
Sponsor Rep. John Hewkin (R)
Summary
Under current law, the maximum duration for an individual to receive unemployment benefits is 20 weeks. Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill modifies the duration an individual can receive such benefits by basing it on the Missouri average unemployment rate, as follows: (1) Twenty weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 9% percent; (2) Nineteen weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 8.5% but no higher than 9%; (3) Eighteen weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 8% but no higher than 8.5%; (4) Seventeen weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 7.5% but no higher than 8%; (5) Sixteen weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 7% but no higher than 7.5%; (6) Fifteen weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 6.5% but no higher than 7%; (7) Fourteen weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 6% but no higher than 6.5%; (8) Thirteen weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 5.5% but no higher than 6%; (9) Twelve weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 5% but no higher than 5.5%; (10) Eleven weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 4.5% but no higher than 5%; (11) Ten weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 4% but no higher than 4.5%; (12) Nine weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is higher than 3.5% but no higher than 4%; and (13) Eight weeks if the Missouri unemployment rate is at or below 3.5%. This bill is the same as SB 8 (2025) and similar to HB 771 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Government Efficiency

HB1856 Increases the cigarette tax from $0.17 per pack of 20 cigarettes to $0.27 per pack to be used for public education and health care purposes, upon voter approval
Sponsor Rep. Steve Butz (D)
Summary
Currently, a tax is levied upon the sale of cigarettes at an amount equal to eight and one half mills per cigarette, until such time as the General Assembly appropriates an amount equal to 25% of the net Federal Reimbursement Allowance to the Health Initiatives Fund, then the tax will be six and one half mills per cigarette beginning July 1st of the fiscal year immediately after such appropriation. Beginning January 1, 2027, an additional tax will be levied upon the sale of cigarettes at an amount equal to five mills per cigarette. This will increase the cigarette tax from $0.17 per pack of 20 cigarettes to $.27 per pack to be used for public education and health care purposes. The revenue generated by this additional tax will be dispersed as specified in the bill. Six months prior to the effective date of the provisions of this bill, licensees must not be allowed to purchase stamps in a number greater than 110% of the number of stamps that were purchased by the licensee during the same period in the previous year. This bill contains a referendum clause and will not become effective unless approved by a majority of the qualified voters in the state. This bill is similar to HB 521 (2025) and HB 2463 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1871 Modifies provisions relating to elections
Sponsor Rep. Peggy McGaugh (R)
Summary
SS SCS HCS HB 1871 -- ELECTIONS This bill designates August 12th of each year as "Election Worker Appreciation Day" in Missouri (Section 9.515, RSMo). The bill provides that a person who registers as a lobbyist will not be prohibited from maintaining a candidate committee seeking certain local offices, provided that the lobbyist is not registered to lobby the office that the candidate committee is designated to seek (Section 105.465). The bill provides that, in the case of a bond election, if an election contest is not filed within 30 days after the official announcement of the election result, all conditions of state election law must be deemed to have been complied with in the issuance of the bond (Section 108.240). This bill allows a notice of election to be sent by email (Section 115.125). Current law requires notice of election to be published twice. The first notice of election must be published within two weeks prior to the election, and the second must be published within one week prior to the election. This bill requires both notices to be published within six weeks prior to the election. Currently, jurisdictions with populations under a certain size and in which no newspaper meeting the legal requirements is published are permitted to send legal notice to voters via mail instead of publishing the notice in a newspaper. This bill allows any election authority the option to mail legal notice rather than publishing the notice in a newspaper. The mailing must occur within six weeks prior to the election. The election authority is permitted to exclude from the mailing any voter designated as inactive. Currently, the filing time for declarations of candidacy for offices in political subdivisions or special districts not otherwise specified in law or charter is from the 17th Tuesday prior to the election through the 14th Tuesday prior to the election. This bill moves the filing time by one week, from the 16th Tuesday prior to the election to the 13th Tuesday prior to the election. The bill also provides that, if the 13th Tuesday prior to the election is a State or Federal holiday, the closing filing date will be the next day that is not a State or Federal holiday (Section 115.127). Currently, no person on probation or parole after conviction of a felony is entitled to vote until finally discharged from probation or parole. This bill specifies certain offenses for which this will be the case, allowing persons on probation or parole after conviction of felonies not listed in the bill to vote prior to being finally discharged from probation or parole (Section 115.133). Currently, the election authority must have automatic tabulating equipment tested within 14 days prior to an election. This bill specifies that this test must occur no later than one week prior to an election (Section 115.233). Currently, covered voters eligible to register to vote can vote in certain elections by submitting a Federal postcard application to apply to vote at their polling place. This bill changes this requirement from the polling place to the office of the election authority on election day. Currently, interstate former residents and new residents can vote absentee for presidential and vice presidential electors. The bill allows them to vote for those electors at the office of the election authority on election day (Section 115.277). This bill provides that all lists of absentee ballot applications for people with permanent disabilities will be kept confidential and must not be posted or displayed in an area open to the general public nor shown to any unauthorized person (Section 115.284). The bill requires any person who files as a candidate for a public office that performs county functions in the City of St. Louis to provide copies of paid receipts or no-tax-due statements for local personal and real property taxes received from the Assessor to the election authority (Section 115.306). The bill applies existing procedures for voters using provisional ballots to voters voting absentee in person at the office of the election authority or at another authorized location designated by the election authority (Section 114.427). This bill allows a provisional ballot to be cast in any public election (Section 115.430). The bill provides that votes for write-in candidates must be counted only for candidates who have filed a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate, even if no candidate has filed for that office (Section 115.453). The bill adds petitioning to the list of activities prohibited to be within a certain distance from the polling place. The bill also applies election-day electioneering rules to any building in which voting is occurring during the absentee voting period. This bill allows an election authority to, after public notice, expand the distance from the polling location within which these activities are prohibited from 25 feet to 50 feet for most electioneering activities. However, candidates not seeking to vote can still engage in these activities within 25 feet from the polling location, and campaign signs will also be permitted within that distance (Section 115.637). Currently, no contribution or expenditure of public funds can be made directly by any officer, employee, or agent of any political subdivision, school district, or charter school to advocate, support, or oppose the passage or defeat of any ballot measure or candidate for public office. This bill adds special districts to the list of public entities in this prohibition (Section 115.646). This bill requires all solicitations for campaign contributions to state, in a clear and conspicuous manner, the committee that will benefit from the contribution. The solicitation must also indicate what percentage of the contribution will be received by the committee, and any other entity that will receive any part of the contribution. The bill allows the solicitation of automatically-recurring contributions only if the contributor gives affirmative consent for the recurring contribution. The passive action of a contributor, including but not limited to failing to uncheck a prechecked box, does not constitute affirmative consent. This bill requires committees soliciting recurring contributions to provide receipts to the contributors, the contents of which are specified in the bill, and to cancel the recurring contributions upon request prior to the next scheduled deduction date. Any committee that solicits and receives a contribution in violation of this bill must return the contribution to the donor immediately. The bill allows the Missouri Ethics Commission to impose a civil penalty on a committee violating the provisions of this bill of up to 100 times the amount of the contribution received in violation of these provisions. The bill requires recurring contributions to expire automatically after the election at which the candidate or measure benefiting from the contribution appears on the ballot. Recurring contributions made to a candidate who wins a primary election can continue until the general election (Section 130.031). This bill adds childcare expenses that result directly from campaigning for office or in connection with the duties of public office and expenses associated with personal security of the holder of elective office to the list of permissible uses of campaign funds (Section 130.034).
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/13/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

HB1876 Requires school districts to provide instruction in cursive writing
Sponsor Rep. Renee Reuter (R)
Summary
This bill requires school districts and charter schools to provide instruction in cursive writing by the end of the fifth grade, including a proficiency test of competency in reading and writing cursive. This bill is the same as HB 2049 (2026); and HB 346; HB 375; HB 906; and HB 1237 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/04/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2115

HB1878 Establishes provisions relating to civil liability for publishing or distributing material harmful to minors on the internet
Sponsor Rep. Renee Reuter (R)
Summary
This bill requires any commercial entity for which it is the regular course of business to publish or distribute in the State a website in which at least 33% of the material published is harmful to minors, as defined in the bill, to verify that any person attempting to access the material is at least 18 years old. Any commercial entity that violates these provisions will be subject to civil liability for damages resulting from a minor's access to the material. The bill prohibits the age- verification provider from retaining any identifying information of the individual after access has been granted or denied to the material, and does not impose an obligation or liability on a provider or user of an interactive computer service on the Internet. This bill has an emergency clause. This bill is the same as HB 236 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026
H - Not heard in committee - House-General Laws

HB1880 Prohibits public schools from selling certain caffeinated drinks to children
Sponsor Rep. Renee Reuter (R)
Summary
This bill requires that school districts and charter schools that receive state aid to not sell drinks containing more than 100 milligrams of caffeine to enrolled children.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-General Laws

HB1882 Authorizes a tax credit for certain youth police initiative programs
Sponsor Rep. Bill Allen (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Crime and Public Safety by a vote of 16 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1882 & 3097. This bill establishes a tax credit program for youth police initiatives. Beginning January 1, 2027, a taxpayer will be able to claim a tax credit against their state tax liability equal to 100% of any eligible contribution made to an eligible non-for-profit organization that operates a youth initiative in an urban area in Missouri. These tax credits must not be refundable, but they may be carried forward for five subsequent tax years, or until the full tax credit has been redeemed. The total amount of tax credits authorized must not exceed $500,000 in any tax year. The Missouri Department of Public Safety must maintain and update a list of eligible entities. The provisions of this bill sunset six years after the effective date. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill represents what good governance should look like. It lets results drive funding and makes this model available statewide so everyone can take advantage of it. Structured programs that bring people together across divides can change attitudes, break down stereotypes and correct misperceptions on all sides. The youth police initiative has operated in Kansas City sine 2017. It?s an intensive five- day after school program to serve all of Missouri?s urban areas. This is a statewide framework that anyone can use. The kids who participate in the program are all at-risk kids, either through probation or some boys and girls clubs. This has been funded by line-item appropriations since 2017 so it?s competing with many other programs for funding and that is not sustainable. We should move it off the budget books and let the private sector fund this. This provides 100% tax credits for contributions. The bill has reasonable safeguards: they are not refundable, but they can be carried forward. It makes it attractive to a broader range of donors. Eligible entities will be made public by the Department of Public Safety. The program includes a 6-year sunset, so if it doesn?t deliver the results or attract the desired donors, the program will end. This was developed to provide training for police cadet academies so they could build and address fractured trust with those in urban communities. The program currently serves 45 communities around the country and provides tools and conflict resolution strategies. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Allen; Ryan Mills, Kansas City Board of Police Commissioner?s; Mary Preston, North American Family Institute; and Richard Smith. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Crime and Public Safety

HB1883 Provides a sales tax exemption for certain used personal property
Sponsor Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R)
Summary
HCS HB 1883 -- SALES TAX EXEMPTION (Van Schoiack) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Ways and Means Current law provides a sales tax exemption for certain durable medical equipment as defined on January 1, 1980, by the Federal Medicare program. This bill removes the reference to January 1, 1980. Additionally, current law provides a sales tax exemption for the sales or rental of manual and powered wheelchairs, including parts. The bill also applies the exemption to accessories for such wheelchairs. This bill exempts from sales tax all sales of used tangible personal property purchased by a consumer at an auction of used tangible personal property not for resale. This provision does not apply to motor vehicles, trailers, boats, or outboard motors purchased or acquired for use on the highways or waters of this State which are required to be titled. This bill is similar to HB 493 (2025) and HCS HB 1606 (2024).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/29/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

HB1887 Creates the offense of and civil penalties for disclosure of intimate digital depictions
Sponsor Rep. Wendy Hausman (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 1887, 2361, 1913, 2862 & 2321 -- PROTECTION OF CERTAIN INDIVIDUALS AFFECTED BY DIGITAL MEDIA (Hausman) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Emerging Issues ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MENTAL HEALTH (Section 407.3007) This bill prohibits any person or entity that develops or deploys artificial intelligence (AI) in this state from advertising or representing to the public that the AI is, or is able to act as, a mental health professional or is capable of providing therapy services, psychotherapy services, or a mental health diagnosis. A violation of this provision constitutes an unlawful practice under the Missouri merchandising practices act. The Attorney General is required to enforce the provisions of this bill, though any individual can report violations to the Attorney General. If a violation is found to have occurred, the Attorney General must commence a civil action. The bill provides for civil penalties as follows: (1) $10,000 for the first violation; or (2) $20,000 for any subsequent violation. SOCIAL MEDIA USE BY MINORS (Section 407.3475) This bill establishes the "Megan Meier Act". The term "Social media platform" is defined in the bill, but such term does not include: (1) Services primarily used for email, direct messaging, or business collaboration; (2) Educational platforms used by schools; (3) Online video gaming services with integrated chat; and (4) Internet service providers. The bill prohibits a minor who is under 16 years of age from creating or maintaining an account; minors who are 16 years of age or older can hold an account only with the verified consent of a parent or legal guardian. The bill allows for social media platforms to permit the creation of an account, but such platforms must provide parents or guardians with the option to: (1) Access and review account activity; (2) Request deletion of the minor's account; and (3) Limit messaging features between the minor and unverified adult accounts. The bill requires social media platforms to implement a secure age-verification process for all Missouri users prior to the creation of an account and sets parameters for permissible age verification techniques. Social media platforms are required to immediately terminate any account found to belong to a person under 16 years of age. If a verified parent or guardian requests deletion of a minor's account, the social media platform must comply within 10 business days of receiving such a request. The bill prohibits social media platforms from: (1) Using addictive or manipulative design features specifically targeting minors; (2) Permitting direct messaging from adults to minors unless the adult is a verified contact; or (3) Serving targeted advertising to minors under 16 years of age based on personal data or behavioral profiling. SEXUALLY EXPLICIT ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION (Section 537.039) This bill makes it unlawful for a person or entity to: (1) Use AI to replicate or alter an image or voice of an individual to generate explicit sexual material, unless the person or entity received express written consent; or (2) Use the likeness of an individual by using AI for explicit sexual material, unless the person or entity received express written consent. Any individual injured through a violation of these provisions can bring a civil cause of action against the person or entity for actual damages, attorney's fees and costs. DISCLOSURE OF INTIMATE DIGITAL DEPICTION CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION (Section 537.043) This bill creates a civil cause of action against a person who discloses a digital depiction, as defined in the bill, of an individual who is under 18 years of age or an intimate digital depiction, as defined in the bill, of an individual and who knows or recklessly disregards the fact that the individual has not consented to such disclosure. The depicted individual may recover damages, as specified in the bill, along with injunctive relief. An action cannot be brought if the disclosure was made in good faith to or by a law enforcement officer in the course of reporting or investigating unlawful conduct or as part of a legal proceeding; or if the disclosure was a matter of legitimate public concern or interest or if the disclosure reasonably intended to assist the depicted individual. A civil action can also be brought against a parent or legal guardian who discloses an intimate digital depiction of his or her child. DISCLOSURE OF DIGITAL DEPICTION CRIMINAL OFFENSE (Section 573.570) The bill also creates the criminal offense of disclosure of a digital depiction. A person commits the offense if the person discloses, or threatens to disclose: (1) A digital depiction of an individual; or (2) An intimate digital depiction with the intent to harass, annoy, threaten, alarm, or cause substantial harm to the finances or reputation of the depicted individual or with the actual knowledge that or reckless disregard for whether the disclosure or threat of disclosure will cause harm to the depicted individual. A person will be guilty of a Class E felony for the first offense or a Class C felony for any second and subsequent offenses. A person will be guilty of a Class D felony if the digital depiction is of an individual under 18 years of age. The criminal penalties will apply to any parent or legal guardian who discloses an intimate digital depiction of his or her child. It will not be a defense in a civil or criminal proceeding that there is a disclaimer stating that the digital depiction was unauthorized or that the depicted individual did not participate in the creation or development of the digital depiction. No later than December 31, 2026, an information content provider, as defined in the bill, must establish a process in which a depicted person can request the removal of a published digital depiction or an intimate digital depiction. Once the information content provider receives such a request, it must follow certain procedures, as described in the bill; however, the information content provider and certain other entities, as described in the bill, will not be held liable for such depictions. The criminal penalties will not apply to certain Federally defined interactive computer services, law enforcement, a person reporting unlawful activity, or a person participating in a hearing, trial, or other legal proceeding. ARTIFICIALLY GENERATED VISUAL DEPICTION (Section 573.010) Currently, the criminal offense for possession or distribution of child pornography includes visual depictions in photographs, films, videos, pictures, or computer-generated images that involves: (1) The production of such visual depiction in which a minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (2) The use of digital, computer, or computer-generated images that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (3) The creation, adaptation, or modification of a visual depiction that shows an identifiable minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction", as defined in the bill, to the definition of "child pornography". Currently, the definition of "material" in relation to pornography criminal offenses includes, but is not limited to, anything printed or written, pictures, drawings, photographs, films, videotapes or videotape productions, and pictorial representations. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction" to the definition. EXPLICIT SEXUAL MATERIAL (Section 573.550) Currently, the definition of "explicit sexual material" in relation to explicit sexual material criminal offenses includes, but is not limited to, any pictorial, three-dimensional, or visual depictions. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction" to the definition. This bill is similar to SB 1117 (2026).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/27/2026
S - Removed from Senate Hearing Agenda - 4/29/26 - 11:00 am - Senate Lounge - Senate-General Laws

HB1888 Modifies and establishes provisions relating to the protection of children
Sponsor Rep. Wendy Hausman (R)
Summary
Currently, a court may communicate with a court in another state concerning proceedings arising out of the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). This bill allows this communication with proceedings arising out of the "Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act" as established in this bill. The bill also modifies the procedure when seeking enforcement of a child custody determination under UCCJEA. The bill establishes the "Uniform Child Abduction Prevention Act". The Act specifies that parties to a child custody determination, as defined in the bill, can petition the court seeking abduction prevention measures to protect the child. The petition must be filed in a court with jurisdiction to make child custody determinations. Missouri courts will have temporary emergency jurisdiction under Section 452.755, RSMo, if the court finds a credible risk of abduction. This bill identifies the procedure for filing the petition and specifies the information that should be included. A court on its own motion can order abduction prevention measures in a child custody proceeding if it finds evidence that there is a credible risk of the child being abducted. The bill specifies the factors the court must consider when determining whether there is a credible risk of abduction. The bill also specifies what a court order must include, especially when the court enters an abduction prevention order, and what measures a court may implement to prevent the imminent abduction of a child. If an abduction prevention order is granted and does not have a specified time period, the order will terminate when the child is emancipated or attains the age of 18, or the order is modified or revoked. The bill also establishes the "Uniform Unregulated Child Custody Transfer Act". The Act specifies that a parent or guardian of a child or an individual with whom a child has been placed for adoption may not transfer custody of the child to another person, subject to exceptions in the bill, with the intent, at the time of the transfer, to abandon the rights and responsibilities concerning the child. That type of transfer is allowed only through the methods specified in the bill. A person may not receive custody of a child, or act as an intermediary in a transfer of custody of a child, if the person knows or reasonably should know the transfer violates any provision in the bill. The person must notify Children's Division within the Department of Social Services of the transfer violation as soon as practicable. A violation of this matter is a class B misdemeanor. If the Children's Division has a reasonable basis to believe that a person has transferred or will transfer custody of a child in violation of the provisions in this bill, the Children's Division may conduct a home visit as provided by law and take appropriate action to protect the welfare of the child. Law enforcement agencies may also investigate a possible violation of the provisions in this bill. If the Children's Division conducts a home visit for a child adopted or placed through an inter-country adoption, the Children's Divisions must: (1) Prepare a report on the welfare and plan for permanent placement of the child; and (2) Provide a copy to the United States Department of State. A person may not solicit or advertise to find a person or child in which to violate the provisions in this bill nor to act as an intermediary in violation of the provisions in this bill. A violation of this matter is as class B misdemeanor. Within a reasonable time before a child-placing agency places a child for adoption with a prospective adoptive parent, the agency must provide or have provided to the prospective adoptive parent general adoption information, which should address the information as described in the bill, as well as information specific to the child that is known to or reasonably obtainable by the agency and material to the prospective adoptive parent?s informed decision to adopt the child, which must include information as specified in the bill. Also, a child-placing agency must provide or have provided to the prospective adoptive parent guidance and instruction specific to the child to help prepare the parent to respond effectively to needs of the child, which must address issues as specified in the bill. If new information is discovered by the child-placing agency at any point in the adoption process, it is to provide that information to the prospective parent. Upon request from the child or the adoptive parent, the child- placing agency or the Children's Division must provide information about how to obtain financial assistance or support services: (1) To assist the child or parent to respond effectively to adjustment, behavioral health, and other challenges; and (2) To help preserve the placement or adoption. The Children's Division and law enforcement can initiate proceedings to determine whether a child-placing agency has failed to comply with the provisions in the bill, which can result in either law enforcement filing for injunctive relief or initiating an administrative proceeding, or Children's Division suspending or revoking the agency's license. The provisions in this bill do not apply to custody of an Indian child, as defined in Section 4(4) of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 U.S.C. Section 1903(4), as amended, to the extent custody is governed by the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978, 25 U.S.C. Sections 1901 through 1963, as amended. This bill is similar to HB 481 (2025) and HB 1660 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1892 Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments of certain stationary property
Sponsor Rep. Wendy Hausman (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 6 to 3. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1892. Beginning January 1, 2027, the provisions of current law relating to depreciable tangible personal property will apply to all real property, placed in service at any time, that is stationary property used for transportation or storage of liquid and gaseous products, including water, sewage, and natural gas that is not propane or LP gas, but not including petroleum products. The county assessor must estimate the value of the stationary property by applying the 20-year depreciation table provided in the bill to the original cost of the property. Taxpayers who own such stationary property must provide the assessor, on or before May 1 of the applicable tax years, with the original cost and the year placed in service. The information will be summarized in a format specified in the bill. Upon request by a taxpayer, the assessor will provide the taxpayer with certain information specified in the bill. This bill is similar to HB 531 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill will provide clarity for assessors and predictability for taxpayers. Currently, most counties depreciate pipelines on a 20-year schedule, and only a few counties do so on a different schedule. Supporters say this bill will provide consistency across counties. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hausman; Associated Industries of Missouri; Summit Utilities, Inc.; Empire District Liberty Utilities Central; Missouri American Water; Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry; Missouri Natural Gas Association; Spire Inc.; and Missouri Energy Development Association. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the bill will cause counties to lose substantial revenue. Those in opposition also state that the bill is based on a form from the State Tax Commission from 2014 that uses a 20-year depreciation schedule. However, that form has since then been revised to reflect a 50- year depreciation schedule. Testifying in person against the bill were Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association; Jeff Porter, Missouri State Assessor's Association. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/17/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB1893 Establishes immunity from civil liability for certain actions taken by private schools related to access to restrooms or changing areas
Sponsor Rep. Wendy Hausman (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 10 to 4. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1893. This bill defines "multiple-occupancy restroom or changing area" and allows private schools to establish such restrooms and changing areas for the exclusive use of males or females. The bill prohibits political subdivisions from adopting any ordinance, rule, or regulation prohibiting private schools from establishing multiple-occupancy restrooms and requires such entities to pay for attorney fees and costs incurred by a private school for a valid defense against such an ordinance or regulation. This bill contains an emergency clause. This bill is similar to HCS HB 1197 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that if a family chooses to send their child to a private school, they should be expected to follow the rules and regulations that the school puts in place. Supporters further state that the provisions of this bill are not an attempt to exclude anyone, but rather a means of protection for the school's students. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hausman; Issachar LLC; Missouri Catholic Conference; Arnie Dienoff; and David Humphreys. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that people who identify as trans are not trying to harm people when they use the bathroom. Opponents further state that the provisions of this bill will lead to more harassment of trans kids and a loss of revenue to the State as more people leave Missouri. Opponents also state that it would be nearly impossible to enforce these provisions, especially since there are no reported incidents of people being harmed by trans people. Testifying in person against the bill were Ariella Allen; Cammie Storm; Nicholas Tatum, In Tact; Samantha Jones; Scott Hammack; Cory Dewald, Pro Mo; Abortion Action Missouri; Alexi Vasquez; Britney Jolene Hochman; Carla Kreegar; Christine E. Reynolds; Keith L. Brown (Kathleen), Trans Liberation Columbia; Landon (Lana) Patterson; May Hall; Mordecai Kreegar; Reverand Meagan Mclaughlin; Rhiannon Trask; American Civil Liberties Union - Missouri; Stevie Miller; and Suzanne Mcginnis. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/16/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Emerging Issues

HB1903 Modifies provisions relating to smoking regulations
Sponsor Rep. Adrian Plank (D)
Summary
This bill amends the provisions of the law relating to smoking regulations, known as the "Indoor Clean Air Act", to provide that the smoking of marijuana will be subject to the same regulations and controls as the smoking of tobacco. This bill also amends Section 290.145, RSMo, to provide, in addition to the lawful use of alcohol or tobacco, that it will be an improper employment practice to refuse to hire, to discharge, or to otherwise disadvantage any employee for the lawful use of marijuana, unless such use interferes with the duties and performance of the employee. This bill is similar to HB 1280 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1905 Changes a pilot agricultural education program in elementary schools to a statewide program
Sponsor Rep. Adrian Plank (D)
Summary
This bill ends the current pilot program for agriculture education in elementary schools in the 2026-27 school year and allows that beginning in the 2027-28 school year the program may be implemented by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education statewide for all elementary schools. This bill is similar to HB 1026 from 2025.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/22/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2097

HB1906 Modifies provisions relating to payments of real and personal property taxes
Sponsor Rep. Peggy McGaugh (R)
Summary
HB 1906 -- PAYMENTS OF PROPERTY TAXES (McGaugh) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Local Government Currently, any county other than a township county may, by order or ordinance, allow its taxpayers the option to pay any part of their real and personal property taxes on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis. This bill allows township counties the option to pass such an order or ordinance. This bill is similar to HB 388 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
HB1913 Creates the offense of and civil penalties for disclosure of intimate digital depictions
Sponsor Rep. Cecelie Williams (R)
Summary
Except as provided in the bill, an individual who is the subject of an "intimate digital depiction", as defined in the bill, that is disclosed without the consent of the individual and made by a person who knows or recklessly disregards that the individual has not consented can bring a civil action against the other person. In the case of an individual who is a minor or is otherwise in need of representation, a representative can assume the individual's rights as listed in the bill, but in no event can the defendant be named as the representative. For the purposes of a civil action based on disclosure of an intimate digital depiction: an individual's "consent", as defined in the bill, to the intimate digital depiction's creation will not establish consent to its disclosure. Consent will be considered validly given only if the requirements listed in the bill are fulfilled. This bill lists what an individual can recover in the event of a civil action based on disclosure of an intimate digital depiction, what the court can order as relief, and in what situations an individual may not bring an action for relief. A disclaimer stating that the intimate digital depiction was unauthorized or that the depicted individual, as defined in the bill, was not involved in the development of the material, is not a defense. The bill also establishes the criminal offense of disclosure of an intimate digital depiction, which a person commits if the person discloses or threatens to disclose an intimate digital depiction: with the intent to harass, annoy, threaten, alarm, or cause harm to the depicted individual; or with the actual knowledge that, or reckless disregard for whether, such disclosure or threatened disclosure will cause harm to the depicted individual. The bill lists the penalties associated with the offense of disclosure of an intimate digital depiction as well as whether certain defenses can be applied to the offense. An interactive computer service, a provider of public mobile services or private mobile radio services, and a telecommunications network or broadband provider will not be held liable for the offense of disclosure of an intimate digital depiction. This bill is similar to HB 362 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/26/2026
H - Superseded by HB 1887

HB1915 Establishes rules to govern contracts between contractors, subcontractors, and other parties to construction contracts
Sponsor Rep. David Casteel (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Economic Development by a vote of 17 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 1915. This bill modifies provisions relating to private construction contracts. The bill defines terms including "construction", "contract", "contractor", "owner", "residential real property", "subcontractor", and "substantial completion". The bill specifies that design or construction work includes design, construction, alteration, repair, maintenance, demolition, excavation, and related surveying, architectural, engineering, landscape design, planning, management services, labor, and materials. For private construction contracts, all parties must make payment according to the terms of the contract or agreement, provided such terms are not inconsistent with the provisions of the bill. An owner must make progress payments to a contractor and any professional engineer, architect, landscape architect, or land surveyor on at least a monthly basis, on a milestone basis, or on a lump sum basis according to the terms of the contract. Except for lump sum and milestone contracts, payments must be based on estimates prepared at least monthly for work performed and materials delivered or purchased and stored for the project. The bill specifies when payments are considered received, including when funds are physically delivered, mailed, or electronically transferred. This bill provides that retainage withheld on private construction contracts or subcontracts must comply with Section 436.303, RSMo. If a subcontractor’s work is completed before substantial completion and the subcontractor can be released without risk to the owner, the contractor must request an adjustment in retainage from the owner as necessary to enable payment to the subcontractor. An owner can reduce or eliminate retainage if the work is proceeding satisfactorily. Upon substantial completion, the owner must pay at least 98% of the retainage, less any offsets or deductions authorized by contract or law, to the contractor. The contractor must pay the subcontractor or supplier after substantial completion and acceptance by the owner’s authorized contract representative. Payment must be made within 30 days after acceptance and after required documentation is provided. If the owner or owner’s representative determines that the work is not substantially completed and accepted, a written explanation must be provided within 14 calendar days. If the written explanation is not given, the owner must pay at least 98% of the retainage within 30 days. The bill provides that invoices, estimates, and final payments must be paid promptly and are subject to late payment charges. If the contractor has not been paid within 30 days, the owner must pay interest at a rate of 1.5% per month until fully paid. A person who has not been paid can bring an action in court, and the court may award interest and reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party. Within two business days after payment from the owner to the contractor for one or more subcontractors’ work, the owner must notify each subcontractor in writing or electronically. When a contractor receives payment, the contractor must pay each subcontractor and material supplier in proportion to the work completed, less retainage as set forth in Section 436.303. If the contractor receives less than the full payment due, the contractor must disburse the funds on a pro rata basis. If the owner withholds payment for specific rejected work or materials, the affected subcontractor or supplier must not be paid for that portion, provided a written explanation is given, and all other subcontractors and suppliers must be paid in full. If a contractor, without reasonable cause, fails to pay subcontractors or material suppliers within 15 days after receiving payment, the contractor must pay interest of 1.5% per month until fully paid. This also applies throughout the contracting chain. The owner must make final payment of all money owed to the contractor, including retainage, less any authorized offsets or deductions, within 30 days of the due date. Final payment is due upon completion of the project and filing of all required documentation or when the project reaches substantial completion. The bill allows contractors, subcontractors, and owners to withhold payment for specified reasons, including unsatisfactory job progress, defective work, disputed work, failure to comply with material contract provisions, third-party claims, failure to make timely payments for labor or materials, damage to another party, reasonable evidence that the contract cannot be completed for the unpaid balance, or certain citations for violations of law. The bill allows a contractor to hold future payments until lien waivers are provided and until confirmation of account status is received. The contractor can remedy unpaid balances through legal means provided in the contract, including, but not limited to, joint checks. If a joint check is required, a processing fee of up to $250 may be charged to the subcontractor and withheld from future payments. The bill specifies that nothing in this bill requires direct payment by an owner to a subcontractor or supplier. No late payment interest is owed for payments withheld in good faith for reasonable cause. If a court determines that payment was not withheld in good faith for reasonable cause, the court can impose interest of 1.5% per month and may award reasonable attorney’s fees. If a court determines that a cause, defense, motion, or proceeding was frivolous and in bad faith, the court must require the responsible party to pay costs and reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees. The provisions of the bill do not apply to construction contracts for work on residential real property. The bill also modifies retainage provisions. A private design or construction contract can include retainage of up to 10% of the payment due, unless additional sums are retained to protect the owner’s interest due to nonperformance. There must be no retainage if the contractor and each subcontractor at every tier are bonded for both payment and performance. Retainage must be held by the owner in trust for the benefit of the contractor, subcontractors, sub-subcontractors, and suppliers at any tier who are not in default. This bill is similar to HB 1089 (2025) and HB 2139 (2024). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will help contractors and subcontractors get paid fairly, faster, and ultimately on time with clear payment timelines. The bill will help reduce the amount of lawsuits regarding pay because it clarifies statute on how contracts should be written. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Casteel; Mechanical Contractors Association of Eastern Missouri; Mechanical Contractors Assocation of Kansas City; Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association; Joshua Klarich Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association - St. Louis Chapter; Xavier Gassier, National Electrical Contractors Association - St. Louis Chapter; SITE Improvement Association; American Subcontractor Association - Midwest Council; and Construction Employers Coalition. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill would allow subcontractors to stop working on projects if they have a payment dispute. Some raised concerns with the timelines in the bill, saying they were too short and restrictive. Opponents further state this bill will negatively affect residential home construction and the government has no right to interfere with private contracts. Testifying in person against the bill were The Builders' Association Chapter, AGC; Edward Twehous, Associated General Contractor of Missouri/Twehous Excavating Company Inc.; Associated Builders and Contractors, Heart Of America; Home Builders Association of Central Missouri; St. Louis Home Builders Association; and Arnie Dienoff. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/29/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Economic Development

HB1921 Creates the "Missouri Worker Dues Tax Fairness Act", authorizing an income tax subtraction for certain union dues paid to a labor organization by a taxpayer
Sponsor Rep. Marty Joe Murray (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Workers Dues Tax Fairness Act". The bill authorizes an income tax subtraction for union dues paid by a taxpayer. The subtraction equals 100% of the taxpayer?s qualified union dues subject to a maximum of $2,000 per tax year for the individual filers and $4,000 per tax year for joint filers. This bill specifies that deductible dues must be related to representation, collective bargaining, contract administration, grievance procedures, or other lawful labor organization activities. The bill excludes political contributions, independent expenditures, and lobbying expenses. Taxpayers claiming the subtraction must maintain documentation of paid dues.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1922 Authorizes income tax deductions for educators and first responders
Sponsor Rep. Marty Joe Murray (D)
Summary
For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this bill authorizes a tax deduction in the amount of 100% of unreimbursed educator expenses incurred by an eligible educator, not to exceed $500. "Eligible educator" and "educator expenses" are defined in the bill. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this bill authorizes a tax deduction for income received as salary or compensation for service as a first responder, not to exceed $500. "First responder" is defined in the bill. This bill is similar to SB 12 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1937 Expands the definition of special victim to include sports officials at a sporting event
Sponsor Rep. Donna Barnes (D)
Summary
This bill expands the definition of "special victim" under Section 565.002, RSMo, to include sports officials at a sporting event while performing their duties. This bill is similar to HB 505 (2025) and HB 1809 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1938 Establishes the offenses of harassment of a school or recreation athletic official and entry or remaining on site of a school or recreation athletic contest after being forbidden
Sponsor Rep. Donna Barnes (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Respect the Whistle Act". A person commits the offense of harassment of a school or recreation athletic contest official if the harassment occurs while the official is actively engaged in the conducting, supervising, refereeing, or officiating of a school-sanctioned athletic contest or a sanctioned recreation athletic contest, or in the immediate vicinity of a school-sanctioned athletic contest or a sanctioned recreation athletic contest and is based on the official's performance in conducting, supervising, refereeing, or officiating of an athletic contest. A person who commits the offense of harassment of a school or recreation athletic contest official will be fined no more than $500, imprisoned for no more than 90 days, or both. In addition, the person will be ordered to perform 40 hours of court-approved community service work and to participate in a court-approved counseling program. A person commits the offense of entry or remaining on site of a school or recreation athletic contest if the person, without authority, goes into or upon or remains in or upon, or attempts to go into or upon or remain in or upon, any immovable property that is used for any school or recreation athletic contest after having been forbidden to do so by any owner, lessee, or custodian of the property or by any other authorized person. A person who commits this offense will be fined no more than $500, imprisoned for no more than six months, or both. This bill is similar to HB 295 (2025) and HB 1590 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1957 Modifies provisions relating to elections
Sponsor Rep. LaKeySha Bosley (D)
Summary
Currently, no person is entitled to vote while confined under a sentence of imprisonment, while on probation or parole after conviction of a felony, or after conviction of a felony or misdemeanor connected with the right of suffrage. This bill entitles to vote people confined under a sentence of imprisonment after conviction of a misdemeanor, while on probation or parole, or after conviction of a misdemeanor connected with the right of suffrage. The bill requires voter registration applications to be made available in English, Spanish, and Braille. This bill requires election authorities to emboss and make available upon request ballots in Braille. Currently, if, after 5:00 p.m. on the second Wednesday before an election, any voter from the jurisdiction is hospitalized, confined due to illness or injury, confined in a residential care facility, or skilled nursing facility in the county in which the jurisdiction is located and will not be able to vote on election day, the election authority must appoint a team to deliver, witness the signing of, and return the voter's absentee ballot application and absentee ballot. This bill adds voters confined in a jail to the list of people who will receive these applications and ballots. This bill is the similar to HB 395 (2025) and HB 1602 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/04/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Corrections and Public Institutions

HB1970 Establishes the "Biometric Information Privacy Act"
Sponsor Rep. Doug Clemens (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the Biometric Information Privacy Act. Any private entity in possession of "biometric identifiers" or "biometric information", as defined in the bill, must have a written and publicly available retention schedule and guidelines for permanently destroying the identifiers and information when the initial purpose for collecting or obtaining them has been satisfied, or within one year of the individual's last interaction with the private entity, whichever occurs first. No private entity can collect, purchase, receive, or otherwise obtain an individual's biometric identifier or information without first informing the individual in writing of the information being collected and the purpose for collection and receiving a written release from the individual authorizing the collection. No private entity in possession of biometric identifiers or information may sell, lease, trade, or otherwise profit from an individual's identifier or information. Any entity or individual required to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act must treat biometric identifiers and information as individually identifiable health information protected under the Act. No private entity may disclose or disseminate an individual's biometric identifier or information unless it has a written release from the individual, the disclosure completes a financial transaction requested or authorized by the individual, the disclosure is required by law, or the disclosure is required pursuant to a warrant or subpoena. A private entity in possession of biometric identifiers or information must securely store the identifiers or information in accordance with the provisions of the bill. A private entity must not: (1) Condition the provision of a good or service on the collection, use, disclosure, transfer, sale, retention, or processing of a biometric identifier unless the biometric identifier is strictly necessary to provide the good or service; or (2) Charge different prices or rates for goods or services or provide a different level of quality of a good or service to any individual who exercises the individual's rights. Any person aggrieved by a violation of the provisions of this bill will have a right of action in court. The court must award all attorneys' fees and costs, including expert witness fees and other litigation expenses, to a prevailing plaintiff. A prevailing plaintiff may recover against a private entity for each violation in varying amounts, depending on whether the entity was found negligently in violation or intentionally or recklessly in violation. This bill is similar to HB 407 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1973 Modifies guidelines for student participation in athletic contests organized by sex
Sponsor Rep. Bennie Cook (R)
Summary
Currently, schools can only allow students to compete in athletics competitions designated for the student's biological sex, as indicated on the student's official birth certificate. Except that female students may participate in athletics competitions designated for male students if no corresponding competition for female students is offered. This provision is set to expire on August 28th, 2027. The bill removes the expiration date for this language. This bill is similar to HB 1663 (2026); HB 36; HB 113; and HB 624(2025)
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/28/2026
H - Superseded by HB 1663

HB1987 Modifies the deadline for filing a declaration of candidacy
Sponsor Rep. Dave Hinman (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Elections by a vote of 13 to 0. Currently, the filing time for declarations of candidacy for offices in political subdivisions or special districts not otherwise specified in law or charter is from the 17th Tuesday prior to the election through the 14th Tuesday prior to the election. This bill moves the filing time by one week, from the 16th Tuesday prior to the election to the 13th Tuesday prior to the election. The bill also provides that if the 13th Tuesday prior to the election is a State or Federal holiday, the closing filing date will be the next day that is not a State or Federal holiday. This bill is similar to HB 208 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the filing dates were altered several years ago. Due to an oversight in that bill, state statute does not provide a remedy for a situation in which the last day to file for office coincides with a State or Federal holiday. The current filing period often ends near Christmas Day and New Year's Day, days during which the offices of the political subdivisions tasked with accepting the filing are typically closed. This bill gives candidates another chance to file if the last day falls on a holiday. This will also improve safety for those officials of political subdivisions that do accept filings on days that all other staff are out of the office. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hinman; Municipal League of Metro St. Louis; City of St. Peters; Missouri Municipal League; Missouri Association of County Clerks & Election Authorities; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/02/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB1994 Requires school districts to display the Ten Commandments in each instructional building in the school district
Sponsor Rep. Bill Irwin (R)
Summary
This bill requires that beginning January 1, 2027, school districts and charter schools must display the Ten Commandments in each building and classroom. The bill provides specific criteria for the posting of the Ten Commandments and authorizes the use of public funds to purchase such displays. However, the school board or governing board is not required to spend the board's moneys to purchase the displays. This bill is similar to HB 1612 (2026) and HB 34 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB1998 Prohibits educational institutions from using state funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion purposes
Sponsor Rep. Mark Meirath (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Defunding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Elementary and Secondary Education Act" and the "Defunding Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Higher Education Act". The bill provides definitions for "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion" or "DEI" and requires that educational institutions no longer use state funding for the implementation, teaching, or support of DEI programs or initiatives. The bill requires any educational institution that uses state funding for a prohibited program to repay the funding. Offending institutions will also have funding suspended in the current fiscal year and in subsequent years until the DEI violation is fixed. The bill requires that the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education issue an annual report on the number of violations and the amount of state funding recovered due to DEI violations. This bill is similar to HB 1024 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 1/28/26 - 2:30 pm - HR 7 - House-Legislative Review

HB2002 Appropriates money for the expenses, grants, refunds, and distributions of the State Board of Education and Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Sponsor Rep. Dirk Deaton (R)
Summary
No summary.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
06/30/2026
G - Signed by the Governor - Vetoed in Part - Section 2.074, 2.084, 2.101, 2.130, 2.235, 2.266, 2.295, 2.331, 2.347

HB2014 Appropriates money for supplemental purposes
Sponsor Rep. Dirk Deaton (R)
Summary
No summary.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
03/11/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

HB2031 Establishes the "Children Harmed by AI Technology Act"
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Children Harmed by AI Technology Act" or the "CHAT Act". The bill defines multiple terms including, a "covered entity" as any person who owns, operates, or otherwise makes available a companion AI chatbot to individuals in this state and defines a "companion AI chatbot" as any software-based artificial intelligence system or program that exists for the primary purpose of simulating interpersonal or emotional interaction, friendship, companionship, or therapeutic communication with a user. The bill requires covered entities to require each individual accessing a companion AI chatbot to make a user account. For each account that exists as of August 28, 2026, the covered entity is required to freeze the account, require that the user verify his or her age using a commercially available method or process designed to ensure accuracy, and using this information, classify each user as a minor or an adult. When an individual creates a new user account to use or interact with a companion AI chatbot, a covered entity is responsible for verifying the age of the user and, if it determines that such user is a minor, must require the account to be affiliated with a parental account, which has also been verified, and obtain verifiable parental consent before allowing the minor to have access to the chatbot. Additionally, the covered entity must block minors' access to any chatbot that engages in sexually explicit or suggestive communication. A covered entity is responsible for maintaining and protecting the confidentiality of the age information provided for verification. This bill requires, at the beginning of any interaction between a user and a companion AI chatbot and at least every sixty minutes during the interaction thereafter, a covered entity to display a clear pop-up window that notifies the user that he or she is not engaging in dialogue with a human counterpart. The bill requires the Attorney General to issue guidance on the provisions of this bill no later than 180 days after August 28, 2026. The Attorney General can initiate a civil action if he or she believes that the provisions of this section have been violated. The bill provides that a covered entity will not be held liable for a violation of this section if certain conditions are met.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2038 Authorizes the "Missouri Homestead Preservation Tax Credit Program" and implements a homestead exemption for certain individuals
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill provides a tax exemption for eligible homeowners who: (1) Have reached the age of 65 as of January 1st of the determining odd-numbered year; (2) Are the owners of a home used as their primary residence; (3) Are liable for real property taxes on the property; and (4) Have a total household income of $125,000 or less. Qualifying taxpayers are eligible for an annual tax exemption for property that is used as an eligible homestead equal to 100% of the tax assessed on their homestead. Each eligible homeowner who has been granted an exemption must reapply on an annual basis, as specified in the bill. A qualifying taxpayer who received the exemption described in this bill will not be eligible for any other property tax relief, property tax credits, or any other tax credits related to such taxpayer's homestead in that same tax year. The tax credit is refundable, but must not be transferred, sold, or assigned. This program sunsets six years after the effective date. This bill establishes "The Missouri Homestead Preservation Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill provides a tax exemption for eligible senior citizens or disabled individuals. If the property tax liability on any residential real estate has increased by more than the homestead exemption, an eligible property owner will receive a homestead exemption credit toward the current tax year to offset the prior year increase in tax liability that exceeds the homestead exemption limit. Applications for the homestead exemption must be completed no earlier than April 1st and not later than October 15th. On the application, the applicant must attest under penalty of perjury: (1) To the applicant's age; (2) That the applicant's prior year income was less than the maximum upper limit, as defined in the bill; (3) To the address of the homestead property; and (4) That any improvements made to the homestead did not total more than 5% of the assessed value, unless the improvement was made in order to accommodate a disabled person. The application must include copies of property tax payments for the last three years for the homestead property. Upon receipt of the application, the State Tax Commission must calculate the tax liability and verify all other required information. The Commission will calculate the level of appropriation necessary to set the homestead exemption limit at five percent when based on a general assessment year, and at two and one-half percent when based on a year without general reassessment. Appropriation for the funding of the homestead exemption is set annually by the General Assembly, as specified in the bill. After the apportionment percentage is determined, the Commission will calculate the credit to be associated with each verified eligible owner's homestead. The Commission must inform the eligible owners in the manner provided in the bill. In the event that an eligible owner dies or transfers ownership of the property after the homestead exemption limit has been set, but on or before December 31st of the year in which the credit would otherwise be applied, the credit is void and any corresponding moneys will lapse to the State and credited to the General Revenue Fund. This program sunsets six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 1061 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2039 Authorizes a tax credit for certain volunteer drivers
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this bill authorizes an eligible taxpayer to claim a tax credit in an amount equal to his or her qualified amount, but not to exceed $3,000, for providing qualified transportation as a volunteer driver for a not-for-profit organization. The amount of the tax credit must be adjusted annually for inflation. Tax credits authorized by the bill are not refundable and cannot be transferred, sold, or assigned, but may be carried forward for three subsequent tax years. A taxpayer cannot claim a credit for any miles driven to the extent the taxpayer has claimed a deduction or any other tax benefit for federal tax purposes, or for which the taxpayer has received reimbursement from a qualified organization. The total amount of tax credits authorized by the bill must not exceed $1 million in any fiscal year, with the amount adjusted annually for inflation. This bill sunsets six years after it effective date. This bill is similar to HB 1236 and SB 607 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2048 Requires the state board of education to provide for a transition to a special administrative board for certain unaccredited school districts
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
This bill allows the State Board of Education, when a school is classified unaccredited, to suspend the governing or managing authority of the elected school board members of the unaccredited district, and take additional actions relating to special administrative boards as specified in the bill. Currently, a special administrative board for a school district must have at lease five members. As specified in this bill, a special administrative board will have seven members, four of whom must be residents of the district. Each member of the board will serve for three years, the qualifications of the members are specified in the bill. The special administrative board must meet at least once per month and each member will receive a salary of $500 a month. Within 30 days after the vote to appoint a member to the special administrative board, if a member of the Missouri House of Representatives whose district touches the school district, in whole or in part, submits a request to the President Pro Tem of the Senate, the appointment will be subject to the advice and consent of the Senate. The members of the district's elected school board will be ex-officio non-voting members of the special administrative board. Upon failure of the school district to be classified as provisionally or fully accredited for at least two successive academic years, the State Board of Education will require the special administrative board to establish a specific plan and timeline for achieving accreditation, including appointing a new superintendent of the school district every three years. A special administrative board may be extended for no more than three years after its expiration date by the State Board of Education. Governance of the school district will be returned to the elected school board upon the expiration of the authority of the special administrative board. The bill repeals a provision of law that allows the State Board of Education to appoint additional members to any special administrative board and sets final terms of office for members of such a board. This bill is similar to HB 387 (2025) and HB 1646 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2049 Requires school districts to provide instruction in cursive writing
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
This bill requires school districts and charter schools to provide instruction in cursive writing by the end of the fifth grade, including a proficiency test of competency in reading and writing cursive. This bill is the same as HB 1876 (2026) and HB 346; HB 375; HB 906; and HB 1237 (2025).
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Read Second Time

HB2050 Requires school superintendents of certain school districts to reside within the school district
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
This bill requires that a school superintendent that is employed by a school district must reside within that district if the district or any school within the district is: (1) Classified as unaccredited; (2) Facing the loss of accredited status; or (3) Experiencing a funding deficit. This requirement also applies to any superintendent that is shared with multiple districts. If any of the districts or schools within the districts meet the specified criteria above the superintendent must reside within one of the districts.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2051 Modifies positions governing school administrators
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, this bill requires the State Board of Education to evaluate the administration of each school district located in St. Louis County. The State Board must then consolidate the school administrators for school districts with fewer than 10,000 students so that only one superintendent, one assistant superintendent, and one director serve no fewer than 10,000 students. The Board is further authorized to determine any additional administrative staff that may be necessary including positions in curriculum, communications, transportation, public safety, food services, and human resources. Based on the consolidation of administration the Board will determine to waive or consider any Missouri School Improvement Plan standards that relate to administration. The school districts that share administration must proportionally share the salaries of the personnel. The bill allows districts that are larger then 10,000 students to also consolidate; districts that consolidate administration must share a border. Districts that receive less than 20% of their funding from the state are exempt from consolidation of administration under this section.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2058 Modifies the "Show MO Act" tax credit for qualified motion media production projects
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Vernetti (R)
Summary
This bill changes the amount of tax credits authorized for film or series production from $8 million per year for film production and $8 million per year for series production to $16 million per year total to be used for either film production or series production. The bill also extends how many tax periods taxpayers can carry forward their unused credits. This bill is similar to HB 1499 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2142

HB2059 Modifies provisions relating to income tax deductions for private pensions
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Vernetti (R)
Summary
This bill increases the maximum amount to be subtracted from a taxpayer's adjusted gross income for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, to the first $12,000 of any retirement allowance received from any privately funded sources. The current maximum is $6,000. The following limits on a taxpayer's adjusted gross income in order to be entitled to the above maximum exemption are also increased for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027: (1) Single, Head of Household -- increases from $25,000 to $50,000; (2) Married Filing Combined -- increases from $32,000 to $64,000; and (3) Married Filing Separate -- increases from $16,000 to $32,600 This bill is similar to HB 44 (2025); HB 2657 (2024); and HB 356 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/05/2026
H - Superseded by HB 1762

HB2060 Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property used for short-term rentals
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Vernetti (R)
Summary
Currently, real property is divided into three separate classifications based on the use or purpose of the property. Each of the subclassifications of property are assessed at different rates. When real property is used for different purposes resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money of the property devoted to each use. This bill provides that when a single family home is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, such a home will be classified as residential property and will not be considered transient housing. This bill is similar to HB 1086 (2025) and HB 1086 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Reported Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight

HB2061 Provides protections against discrimination and antisemitism in public schools and public postsecondary educational institutions
Sponsor Rep. George Hruza (R)
Summary
SS HB 2061 -- PROHIBITING ANTISEMITIC ACTIONS This bill defines "antisemitism" and requires that public schools, charter schools, school districts, and public institutions of higher education adopt a policy clearly defining antisemitism that utilizes context and other relevant factors for each educational institution's code of conduct. The bill prohibits antisemitic conduct in the same manner that discrimination motivated by race is treated. This bill states that all persons are equal before the law and entitled to equal rights and opportunities. This bill further states that the General Assembly condemns discrimination in all forms, including antisemitism. The bill prohibits discrimination by public schools, school districts, and public institutions of higher education on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, disability, religion, or marital status against students or employees. The bill provides that classes, guidance services, counseling services, and financial assistance services be available equally. The bill requires that public schools, charter schools, school districts, and public institutions of higher education must consider whether possible antisemitic speech relating to the criticism of Israel is related to public policy or if the speech is inconsistent with the same types of condemnations of nations with comparable circumstances to Israel. These considerations must be factored into the totality of the circumstances involved, and will only apply if the conduct relating to the speech also creates an atmosphere of fear or intimidation. The bill requires Title VI coordinators at the State Board of Education and the Coordinating Board for Higher Education to monitor antisemitic discrimination and harassment at public schools, charter schools, school districts, and public institutions of higher education. The coordinators will investigate complaints and determine if an education institution allowed or failed to prohibit the discrimination and harassment, or if the educational institution made consistent use of their adopted policy defining antisemitism, and compile annual reports on antisemitic discrimination or harassment and all other Title VI complaints, to be submitted to the General Assembly by July 1st of each year. Except, those complaints involving public institutions of higher education that solely contain instances of political or religious speech that is protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or Missouri Constitution will not be reported, compiled, or published by the Coordinating Board. This bill also states that no public institution of higher education will create a list, registry, or database of students based on their religious or political views, opinions, or expressions, which are protected under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution or Missouri Constitution.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
04/23/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

HB2075 Establishes provisions for restroom designations in all public buildings
Sponsor Rep. Brandon Phelps (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 10 to 4. The bill defines "biological sex" as the biological indication of male or female in the context of reproductive potential or capacity, whereas "gender" is defined as the psychological, behavioral, social, and cultural aspects of being male or female. The bill also defines the terms "school", "institution of higher education", "single-occupancy facility", "multi-occupancy facility", "family facility", and "public building". This bill requires multi-occupancy restrooms, locker rooms, changing rooms, and shower rooms found in public buildings, schools, and institutions of higher education to be designated with clear signage for the exclusive use of person of the male biological sex or female biological sex. A member of the male biological sex will not be permitted to use a multi-occupancy facility that has been designated for the exclusive use of persons of the female biological sex, and a member of the female biological sex will not be permitted to use a multi-occupancy facility that has been designated for the exclusive use of persons of the male biological sex. The bill specifies that a multi-occupancy facility must not be designated for use by persons of a particular gender or genders instead of, or in addition to, persons of a particular biological sex. However, this provision does not prohibit family facilities. Schools are prohibited from allowing members of the male biological sex and the female biological sex from sharing overnight accommodations in any setting where students are staying overnight, including school trips. This bill requires policies adopted in accordance with these provisions to include accommodations for persons who request them, to include the use of single-occupancy facilities. The bill sets forth exceptions to the above rules for the following individuals: (1) A child under ten years of age who is being assisted by a parent, legal guardian, or family member, as well as the parent, legal guardian, or family member who is assisting such child; (2) A person with a disability who is being assisted by another person, as well as the person assisting such person with a disability; (3) An employee whose job duties require them to enter a multi- occupancy facility that is designated for a biological sex that differs from such employee's biological sex; or (4) A person who enters a multi-occupancy facility that is designated for a biological sex that differs from the person's biological sex because the person reasonably believes he or she is responding to a legitimate emergency. Failure to comply with the provisions of this bill will result in the revocation or withholding of state funding for the entity operating a public building, school, or institution of higher education. This bill is similar to SB 597 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the provisions of this bill are not an attempt to exclude anyone, but rather as a means of protection for the school's students. Supporters further state that without these protections, female students are at risk of uncomfortable or even dangerous situations, and the primary objective of a public school is to ensure that students are safe from harm. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Phelps; Issachar LLC; Missouri Catholic Conference; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that people who identify as trans are not trying to harm people when they use the bathroom. Opponents further state that the provisions of this bill will lead to more harassment of trans kids and a loss of revenue to the State as more people leave Missouri. Opponents also state that it would be nearly impossible to enforce these provisions, especially since there are no reported incidents of people being harmed by trans people. Testifying in person against the bill were Amy Sapphire; Ariella Allen; Travis L Simons; Temara Jasmine; Nicholas Tatum, In Tact; Samantha Jones; Scott Hammack; Cory Dewald, Pro Mo; Andrew Robert Trask (Luna); Abortion Action Missouri; Alexi Vasquez; Britney Jolene Hochman; Carla Kreegar; Christine E. Reynolds; Dustin Turpin; Keith L. Brown (Kathleen), Trans Liberation Columbia; Landon (Lana) Patterson; Mandy Monsees; May Hall; Mordecai Kreegar; Reverand Meagan Mclaughlin; Rhiannon Trask; American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri; Stevie Miller; and Suzanne Mcginnis. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/16/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Emerging Issues

HB2078 Changes provisions governing school superintendent salaries
Sponsor Rep. Ben Keathley (R)
Summary
This bill defines "administrative staff" and "total compensation" and requires that for the 2027-28 school year, at least 88% of the total compensation expended on teachers and administrative staff by a district, be expended on teachers. For the 2028-29 school year and thereafter, the percentage of teacher compensation comprising the total compensation must increase by 1% until it is at least 95%. This bill is similar to HB 341 (2025) and HCS HB 2344 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2079 Exempts the retail sale of food from state sales and use tax and phases out local sales and use tax on the retail sale of food over four years
Sponsor Rep. Ben Keathley (R)
Summary
Under the provisions of this bill, beginning August 28, 2026, there will be no state sales or use tax on retail food. Beginning January 1, 2027, the rate of local sales and use tax on retail food will be annually reduced in four equal increments over a period of four years. Beginning January 1, 2031, there will be no local sales or use tax on retail food. This bill is similar to HB 345 (2025); HB 2055 (2024); and SB 1062 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2085 Modifies provisions relating to tobacco product regulations
Sponsor Rep. Ben Keathley (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2085 -- TOBACCO PRODUCTS (Keathley) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Commerce The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2085. This bill specifies that the State of Missouri must preempt the sale of tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, and vapor products. This preemption will include local ordinances that deal with: (1) Ingredients; (2) Setting the age to sell or purchase at 21 years of age and above; and (3) Licensing and products bans. In addition, existing state regulations on the sale of tobacco products to minors found in Sections 407.924 through 407.934, RSMo, will supersede any local laws, ordinances, orders, rules, or regulations enacted by a county, municipality, or other political subdivision regulating the sale of tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products. The bill does not prohibit counties, municipalities, or other political subdivisions from enforcing ordinances or regulations that set the age to sell or purchase tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, and vapor products to individuals under 21 years of age. This bill will not apply to any local laws, ordinances, orders, rules, or regulations enacted by a county, municipality, or other political subdivision prior to January 1, 2026. This bill is similar to HB 344 (2025); HB 2060 (2024); HB 1039 (2023); and SB 522 (2023).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2089 Authorizes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption"
Sponsor Rep. Aaron Crossley (D)
Summary
This bill creates the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption" which provides a tiered property tax exemption system for veterans with disabilities. The exemptions are based on a disability percentage, certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, an annual exemption will be granted for a property that is used as a qualified residence owned by a veteran with a disability, limited to the amounts as follows: (1) For veterans with service-connected disability of 30% or more but less than 50%, the annual exemption is $2,500; (2) For veterans with a service-connected disability of 50% or more but less than 70%, the annual exemption is $5,000; (3) For veterans with service-connected disability of 70% or more, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the qualified residence; and (4) For a taxpayer who is the surviving spouse of a veteran whose death was determined to be service-connected and who is certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as a recipient of dependency and indemnity compensation under federal law, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the qualified residence. If a surviving spouse of a veteran sells the qualified residence, an amount can be transferred to his or her new residence as long as it is used as his or her primary residence and he or she does not remarry. No exemption will be allowed for the tax year in which the surviving spouse remarries. The bill requires each taxpayer that is granted the exemption to reapply on an annual basis unless the veteran has a combined service-connected disability with a rating of 100% and is deemed permanently and totally disabled, as specified in the bill. The provisions of this bill sunset six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 700(2025) and HB 1419 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/01/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2306

HB2091 Modifies provisions relating to school employee retirement systems
Sponsor Rep. Aaron Crossley (D)
Summary
When a Public School Retirement System school district has declared a shortage of noncertificated employees, it can employ a retired noncertificated employee for up to four years without affecting the noncertified employee's retirement benefit. Currently, a cap of the lesser of 10% of noncertificated staff or five employees is in place. This bill changes the cap to the greater of 1% of the total of certificated teachers and noncertificated staff or five employees. This bill is similar to HB 597 (2025) and similar to HB 1722 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2095 Modifies the total cost of living adjustments for members of the Public School Retirement System and the Public Education Employee Retirement System
Sponsor Rep. Willard Haley (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Pensions by a vote of 9 to 0 with 3 members voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2095. Currently, retired members of the Public School Retirement System ("PSRS") and the Public Education Employee Retirement System ("PEERS") may receive yearly cost of living adjustments on monthly retirement allowances, but the total of the cost of living adjustments must not exceed 80% of a member's original monthly retirement allowance. Under the provisions of this bill, annual increases can be approved by the Board of Trustees beginning December 31, 2026, and every December 31st thereafter, except the increases to the limitation must not exceed 2% per year. Additionally, if the investments of the system earn 2% or greater returns than the investment return rate adopted by the Board in a given year, the 80% cap limitation on the total cost of living adjustments may be increased by 2% for that year. However, the cost of living adjustments above 80% are not culmulative. This bill is the similar as HB 329 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that there are currently retired teachers that have reached the cap on cost of living allowances and thus are limited in the amount of retirement they may receive. Inflation increases but these teachers are negatively impacted even when the system itself is doing well. This small change would benefit a small group of teachers and should be actuarially sound. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Haley and Missouri Retired Teachers Association. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the Missouri State Teacher Retirement System is the 91st largest fund in the world and over the last 15 years there has been a cost of living increase of 30%. Over that same period the rate for teachers and districts has been maintained as well. This is in part due to a high assumed rate of return and that the last benefit for members of the system was 30 years ago. Testifying in person on the bill was Public School Retirement System of Missouri/Public Education Employee Retirement System of Missouri. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Pensions

HB2097 Changes a pilot agricultural education program in elementary schools to a statewide program
Sponsor Rep. John Martin (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 2097 & 1905 -- AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION (Martin) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Rural Issues This bill ends the current pilot program for agriculture education in elementary schools and authorizes that beginning in the 2027-28 school year the program can be implemented by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education statewide for all elementary schools that elect to participate. The bill removes the requirement for reporting to the House and Senate committees on agriculture and education and requires the report to be posted on the Department's website. This bill is the similar to HB 1026 and HB 1555 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/14/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Fiscal Review

HB2098 Modifies provisions governing the classification of real property
Sponsor Rep. Michael Davis (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 9 to 1. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2098. This bill adds recreational areas used for noncommercial leisure or aesthetic purposes to the definition of residential, as that definition relates to the subclassification of real property for taxation purposes. The bill provides that when a single-family home that is owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC) is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, the home will be classified as residential property and will not necessarily be considered "transient housing". The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will ensure green spaces are taxed at lower rates. Supporters further say the bill also reclassifies golf courses, nature preserves, and other similar spaces to a classification that is a more appropriate subclass of real property. Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Davis. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that reclassifying these green spaces as agriculture goes against the purpose of agricultural land as defined in law. Testifying in person against the bill were Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association; and Jeff Porter, Missouri State Assessor's Association. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/11/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2110 Establishes procedures authorizing certain school districts to detach from a community college district upon voter approval
Sponsor Rep. Michael Davis (R)
Summary
This bill requires that in November of 2026 any school district that is attached to a community college district and located wholly in any county with more than 100,000 but fewer than 120,000 inhabitants and with a county seat with more than 9,000 but fewer than 11,000 inhabitants, currently Cass County, must submit to the voters in the district a ballot measure to determine if the school district should detach from the community college district. Sample ballot language is provided and if the vote is in the affirmative the school district must detach within six years of the vote. If the vote is not in the affirmative the ballot issue will be brought forward every six years until approved.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2111 Modifies provisions relating to the calculation of income tax, repealing income tax subtractions for certain capital gains
Sponsor Rep. Kathy Steinhoff (D)
Summary
Currently, 100% of all income reported as capital gains and the portion of capital gains on the sale or exchange of specie are exempt from Missouri's state income tax. This bill provides an end date for these exemptions. All income reported as capital gains and the portion of capital gains on the sale or exchange of specie will no longer be exempt from the Missouri state income tax after December 31, 2026.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2112 Establishes the "Missouri Teachers Matter Grant Program"
Sponsor Rep. Kathy Steinhoff (D)
Summary
This bill creates the "Missouri Teachers Matter Grant Program". This program provides two types of grants to qualified teachers in Missouri school districts: (1) MTM District Grant: A matching grant of up to $1,000 from the State and $1,000 from the school district's funds, awarded to teachers who renew their contracts before June 1st. (2) MTM State Grant: A grant of up to $4,000 awarded to qualified teachers who complete at least 40 hours of self- directed duties beyond their regular teaching contract, such as coaching extracurricular activities or providing additional student support. The program sunsets in six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 444 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2115 Requires school districts to provide instruction in cursive writing
Sponsor Rep. Peggy McGaugh (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 13 to 4 with 4 present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2115 & 1876. This bill requires school districts and charter schools to provide instruction in cursive writing. Beginning in the 2028-29 school year, students by the end of the fifth grade shall take a teacher-constructed test to demonstrate competency in reading and writing cursive. This bill is similar to HB 1876; HB 2773 (2026) and HB 346; HB 375; HB 906; and HB 1237 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this is a big picture concept and research shows that cursive writing is important for the development of fine motor skills and promotion of creativity. The individual's handwriting conveys intelligence and grace and writing in cursive keeps the brain active. Being able to read cursive is important so that primary source documents may be read and the stories from our past can be understood. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative McGgaugh; nd Missouri NEA. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2120 Establishes antibullying requirements for school districts
Sponsor Rep. John Black (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 2120 & 1698 -- SCHOOL ANTIBULLYING POLICIES (Black) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education This bill modifies Section 160.775, RSMo, by establishing "Sawyer's Law". The bill defines the terms "act of school violence" or "violent behavior", "crime", and "zero-tolerance disciplinary policy". The bill requires any school bullying policy to include a restriction on zero-tolerance disciplinary policies for any student who is a victim of bullying. A statement regarding any student who engages in self defense must be considered by the school district or charter school administration when determining any disciplinary action for a student who was responding to an act of school violence or violent behavior committed against the student. The bill requires charter schools to adopt and school districts to update current school bullying policies. This bill requires that all reported incidents be submitted in writing and that the results of an investigation include a description of any interventions, initiatives, techniques, or discipline provided to all students involved on a standardized form developed by the district. The policy is required to outline a procedure for responding to an investigation that finds an act of bullying has occurred. The procedure must include notifying the parents of the bullying student and students committing acts of bullying being included in educational trainings and prevention initiatives. The bill requires the policy to outline annual mandatory training for any district employee and volunteer who has contact with students; training on appropriate interventions and associated liability for action or inaction must be included in the training. This bill requires the school administration to report monthly to the school board all acts of bullying, discipline for bullying, and all other disciplinary referrals. The school board must review the monthly report in a closed meeting and address concerns related to reported incidents within 30 days. The bill provides immunity from liability for any school district employee and volunteer who intervenes in an incident of school violence, violent behavior, or criminal actions against any student that is a victim of bullying; the bill specifies that the employee must follow the proper procedure and act in good faith to intervene under the defense of justification provided under Chapter 563. The bill provides protection from civil liability for any school district or charter school for disciplinary actions if the procedures were properly followed and if a suit is brought the school may recoup attorney's fees if they prevail. This bill requires that, for reporting requirements for mandated reporters under Section 210.115, bullying, incidents of school violence, and crime are considered abuse and required to be reported, with protections provided for reporting compliance. The bill prevents charter schools from expelling or transferring a student out of the school solely due to reports of bullying. This bill is similar to HB 351 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/28/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

HB2121 Enacts the "Missouri Religious Liberty in Schools Awareness Act"
Sponsor Rep. John Black (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Missouri Religious Liberty in Schools Awareness Act" and requires public schools to post a statement relating to religious freedoms. The statement includes protected religious freedoms such as a student's ability to express beliefs about religion to others; pray and read the Bible or other religious texts or materials during free time; form and organize prayer groups and religious clubs; join or not join such clubs; and discuss the influence of religion in history and culture. The bill requires the statement to be posted in a prominent location in each public school building where student instruction occurs regularly. This bill is similar to HCS HB 1262 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2122 Allows electrical corporations to charge for services based on the costs of certain construction work in progress
Sponsor Rep. John Black (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 2122 & 1626 -- MISSOURI NUCLEAR CLEAN POWER ACT (Black) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Utilities This bill establishes the "Missouri Nuclear Clean Power Act", which allows clean baseload electric generating plants or facilities rated at 600 megawatts or less that utilize clean baseload electric generating plants to produce energy not in commercial operation as of August 28, 2026, to include in the corporation's rate base any amounts recorded to construction work in progress. The Public Service Commission will determine the amount of construction work in progress as specified in the bill. Base rate recoveries arising from the inclusion of construction work in progress in base rates are subject to refund. These provisions will expire on December 31, 2036, unless the Commission determines that good cause exists to extend these provisions through December 31, 2046. The secretary of the Commission must notify the Revisor of Statutes if the conditions for the extension have been met. This bill is the similar to HCS HB 50 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
HB2126 Modifies provisions governing school administrator evaluations and contracts
Sponsor Rep. Brad Banderman (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 17 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2126 & 2197. This bill defines "building-level administrator" as a school official who supervises or evaluates other licensed staff. The bill provides schools with direction on contracts for building- level administrators, including contract renewal and nonrenewal notice by March 1st in the year the contract would expire. An administrator whose contract is renewed must accept or reject the contract within 15 business days after receiving the contract. Administrator contracts cannot be renewed or nonrenewed without having at least one evaluation within the contract year. Building level administrators who have contracts that are not renewed have the right to request and receive the reasons for nonrenewal within 10 days and have a right to a closed meeting with the school board within 10 days. This bill is similar to HCS HB 1365 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that having an earlier deadline gives administrators a better opportunity to seek out a new job if they need to. Often, the reason for a nonrenewal is not due to job performance but rather of a political nature. There should be safeguards in place for administrators and this bill provides certain protections. Having standard evaluations gives opportunity for improvement and provides both the administrator and the district with a smoother process. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Banderman; Missouri State Teachers Association; Missouri National Education Association; Stacy Fick, Missouri Association of Elementary School Principals; and Devin Johnson, Missouri Association of Secondary School Principals. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that currently, teacher and administrator evaluations are not included in the Missouri School Improvement Plan, but the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education does provide multiple evaluation models that are growth orientated. Testifying in person on the bill was Perry Gorrell. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/16/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2129 Modifies provisions governing charter school compliance with educational requirements
Sponsor Rep. Mark Boyko (D)
Summary
This bill expands current requirements for charter schools to include additional requirements currently applicable to school districts, specifically: (1) Student participation in moderate physical activity; (2) Youth sports brain injury prevention; (3) Observation of Veterans Day; (4) Providing access to military recruiters; (5) Meeting the minimum school term; and (6) Adopting prevailing wage requirements for school construction projects. This bill is similar to HB 889 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2130 Changes the definition of a "qualified school" for purposes of the Missouri empowerment scholarship accounts program
Sponsor Rep. Mark Boyko (D)
Summary
This bill modifies the definition of "qualified school" for the purposes of the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program. The bill requires charter schools, private schools, and public schools to meet certain requirements in order to be considered qualified schools for the program. Under the bill, qualified schools must follow the minimum school term provisions established by law, provide dyslexia assessments, have students participate in moderate physical activity, conduct youth sports brain injury prevention, observe Veterans Day, provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation instruction, display the United States flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance, provide access to official recruiting representatives of the military, set an opening school term date as provided by law, and follow prevailing wage requirements for school construction projects. This bill is similar to HB 812 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2132 Modifies provisions relating to the taxation of cigarettes and tobacco products
Sponsor Rep. Mark Boyko (D)
Summary
This bill authorizes any political subdivision of this state to increase the tax on cigarettes and tobacco products within its boundaries if a majority of the qualified voters of the political subdivision approve of the increase. This bill is similar to HB 718 (2025) and HB 810 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2133 Expands the definition of special victim to include sports officials at a sporting event
Sponsor Rep. Mark Boyko (D)
Summary
This bill expands the definition of "special victim" under Section 565.002, RSMo, to include sports officials assaulted at a sporting event while performing their duties as sports officials. This bill is similar to HB 256 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2142 Modifies the "Show MO Act" tax credit caps for qualified motion media production projects
Sponsor Rep. Colin Wellenkamp (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 2142 & 2058 -- TAX CREDIT FOR MOTION MEDIA PRODUCTION PROJECTS (Wellenkamp) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Economic Development This bill changes the amount of tax credits authorized for film or series production from $8 million dollars per year for film production and $8 million dollars per year for series production to $16 million per year total to be used for either film production or series production. The bill also extends how many tax periods taxpayers can carry forward their unused credits. This bill is similar to HB 1499 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/29/2026

HB2143 Modifies provisions relating to incentives for interstate business relocation and authorizes DED to determine clawback provisions for the state and political subdivisions
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Coleman (R)
Summary
This bill reinstates provisions of law prohibiting the issuance of incentives under the BUILD program, the new or expanded business facilities program, the Urban Enterprise Loan program, or the Missouri Works program for businesses that relocate from certain counties in Kansas to certain counties in Missouri, contingent on similar action taken by Kansas that expired on August 28, 2025. The bill also adds a provision that the Department of Economic Development must determine clawback provisions related to tax incentives and funding by the State or any political subdivision as they relate to incentives for certain interstate business relocation. This bill is similar to SB 630 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2144 Increases the Public School Retirement System (PSRS) one-time death benefit payment to $10,000 for retiree member deaths arising on or after August 28, 2026
Sponsor Rep. Bob Bromley (R)
Summary
Currently, the death benefit for members of the Missouri public school retirement system is $5,000. This bill raises such death benefit to $10,000 beginning August 28, 2026.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/11/2026, 3:00 PM - House-Pensions, HR 6

HB2147 Precludes call spoofing to business subscribers and establishes the "Caller ID Anti-Spoofing Act"
Sponsor Rep. Travis Wilson (R)
Summary
The bill adds business subscribers to the No-Call List and specifies that a person does not have to renew his or her objection to receiving solicitations. The bill establishes the "Caller ID Anti-Spoofing Act", which requires telecommunications providers to block certain calls as specified in the bill and consistent with Federal law. A provider is considered in compliance with these requirements if the provider has filed a certification with the Federal Communications Commission that the provider's traffic meets certain requirements detailed in the bill. No later than August 28, 2027, providers must implement a STIR/SHAKEN authentication protocol or an alternative technology that provides comparable or superior capability to verify and authenticate certain caller identification information. Any provider that knowingly fails or neglects to comply with these requirements is subject to fines of $25,000 for the first offense, $50,000 for the second offense, and $75,000 for the third and any subsequent offense. It is a violation of these provisions if a caller enters false information or places a call knowing false information was entered into a caller identification service with the intent to deceive, defraud, or mislead the recipient of the call. Certain calls are exempt from these requirements as specified in the bill. The recipient of any call in which the caller uses false caller identification information will have standing to recover punitive damages against the caller in an amount up to $5,000 per call. Call recipients can bring an action under this section as members of a class. The Attorney General can initiate legal proceedings or intervene in legal proceedings on behalf of call recipients. This bill is similar to HB 509 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/18/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2658

HB2152 Modifies definitions to expand the types of facilities eligible for a certain sales tax exemption
Sponsor Rep. Michael Davis (R)
Summary
Currently, certain replacement machinery, equipment, and parts are exempt from sales tax. This bill includes purchases of vehicles which are unusable as a whole within the meaning of "part". This bill is similar to HB 1402 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2154 Enacts provisions governing adult student access to virtual schools
Sponsor Rep. Josh Hurlbert (R)
Summary
This bill provides adults over 21 years of age without a high school diploma or equivalence certificate with the opportunity to enroll in a state-approved virtual course or full-time virtual program offered by the adult student's resident district or public institution of higher education. The bill allows the adult student to enroll in the Missouri course access and virtual school program established under Section 161.670, RSMo. Program providers will receive a monthly payment from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education in an amount equal to 14% of the state adequacy target for each successfully passed course, provided that the state money is in excess of the constitutionally required minimum public school funding. Districts will not be responsible for reporting adult student's information as required under sections 160.522 or 161.670. This bill is similar to HCS HB 1516 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2157 Enacts provisions requiring school districts to develop policies for released-time courses
Sponsor Rep. Josh Hurlbert (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Missouri Released-Time Education Act". The bill defines "released-time course" as a course in religious instruction taught by an independent sponsoring entity that a student is excused from school to attend, and requires school districts to adopt a policy to excuse a student from school to attend a released-time course. Upon the request of a student's parent, schools will excuse a student to attend a released-time course for at least one hour per week but no more than five hours per week if specified conditions outlined in the bill are met. Attendance for a released-time course will be excused and not count against a school for state aid purposes or the student for attendance requirements. School districts will adopt a policy that awards credit for the completion of a released-time course and recognize the credits awarded by an accredited provider of such courses. Such credit will be awarded based on criteria within the bill on a neutral basis, and the bill outlines a cause for civil action for any violation. This bill is similar to HB 1393 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2158 Modifies provisions of the "Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program" tax credit
Sponsor Rep. Josh Hurlbert (R)
Summary
Currently, a taxpayer who makes a qualifying contribution to an educational assistance organization can carry the tax credit forward to any of the taxpayer's four subsequent tax years. Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill allows a taxpayer carry the tax credit back to the taxpayer's immediately prior tax year. This bill is similar to HB 568 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/12/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2165 Expands the definition of special victim to include sports officials at a sporting event
Sponsor Rep. David Dolan (R)
Summary
This bill expands the definition of "special victim" under Section 565.002, RSMo, to include sports officials at a sporting event while performing their duties as sports officials or as a direct result of those duties. This bill is similar to HB 379 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2168 Establishes the Missouri motion picture rebate incentive program
Sponsor Rep. Mike Steinmeyer (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Motion Picture Rebate Incentive Program". A motion picture production company must submit an application for rebate to the Department of Economic Development. The Department can approve an application for rebate of up to 30% of qualifying expenses incurred in Missouri by a motion picture production company. The Department can also award an additional rebate of 5% to a motion picture production company if the Department determines that at least 75% of certain production cast and crew are residents of Missouri or at least 75% of productions occur outside of Kansas City and St. Louis. The total amount of rebates authorized for this Program must not exceed $35 million of the moneys appropriated by the General Assembly, per fiscal year. No single qualified motion picture production project can be eligible to receive more than 25% of the annual appropriation cap in any fiscal year. Any unused rebate funds can be carried forward and made available in the subsequent fiscal year. Rebates will be considered expenditures of the State government and will not be deemed to be tax credits or tax expenditures. Each motion picture production company applying for this rebate must submit a certified cost report to the Department. This cost report must include key information. The Department must compile and publish a report to be submitted to the General Assembly and the Governor by January 15th of each year that includes certain information. This bill creates the "Motion Picture Production Fund", within the State Treasury. The moneys in this Fund must solely be used for purposes provided in the bill. This Program and Fund will become effective on July 1, 2027, and they expire on December 31, 2036, unless it is reauthorized by the General Assembly.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2172 Provides procedures for making real property available for school purposes to charter schools and school districts
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
This bill prohibits cities, counties, and school districts, from adopting or enforcing any ordinance, policy, resolution, deed restriction, property-use restriction, or other such restriction that prevents property they sell, lease, or transfer from being used for any lawful educational purpose by a charter school. The bill also prohibits any deed restriction or other such restriction that limits property to specific non-educational uses. Any existing restriction that bars property previously used for educational purposes from being used for future educational purposes is void. Any ordinance, policy, regulation, deed, use restriction, or contract made in violation of this bill is void from its inception. The bill provides that school districts that attempt to lease or sell an unused facility must offer the right of first refusal to public entities. Districts must provide public notice on the district website including the square footage, contact information, and expiration date of right of first refusal which must be 60 days from the first notice. The bill outlines conditions for the selling or leasing of unused facilities to public entities and provides public entities with six months from making a written offer to complete a purchase or lease. If a public entity plans on selling an unused facility it must first offer the facility to the district from which it was purchased for first refusal. This is similar to SB 1273 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/03/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Emerging Issues

HB2173 Modifies provisions relating to income tax on tips
Sponsor Rep. Chad Perkins (R)
Summary
This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, and for the purpose of determining the Missouri adjusted gross income, 100% of tips received by or paid to a tipped employee who is engaged in an occupation that customarily and regularly receives tips must be subtracted from such taxpayer?s Federal adjusted gross income. This bill is similar to HB 198 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2178 Modifies provisions governing the taxation of property
Sponsor Rep. Chad Perkins (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2178 -- TAXATION OF PROPERTY (Perkins) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Property Tax Reform This bill requires that the election authority for a political subdivision or special district label property taxation-related ballot measures numerically or alphabetically. Ballot measures will not be labeled in any other descriptive manner. (Section 115.240) Beginning January 1, 2027, the bill requires that ballot language for a vote to levy a real property tax or personal property tax include elements as specified in the bill. This bill requires ballot language to describe the desired tax as a specified amount per $100,000 or per $10,000 of appraised value, depending on whether the property is residential, commercial, agricultural, or a motor vehicle. The bill prohibits any political subdivision or election authority from advertising or describing any proposed property tax as a ?no tax increase? tax proposal. The bill requires ballot language statements to be fair, true, and accurate. (Section 115.706) Currently, real property is divided into three separate classifications based on the use or purpose of the property. Each of the subclassifications of property are assessed at different rates. When real property is used for different purposes resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money of the property devoted to each use. This bill provides that when a single family home that is owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC) is leased, in whole or in part, for 30 consecutive days or less, the home will be classified as residential property and will not necessarily be considered "transient housing". (Section 137.016) The bill provides that when a valuation of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, and other real properties is made by a computer, computer-assisted method, or a computer program, the burden of proof to sustain the valuation must be on the assessor at any hearing or appeal. This bill requires the assessor to conduct a physical inspection of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property before the assessor can increase the assessed valuation of such parcel of real property by more than 15%. If any general reassessment of property causes the assessed valuation to increase by more than 15% from the previous assessment, except for an increase due to new construction or improvement, the increase must be evenly divided between each of the next successive reassessment cycles in a manner that does not cause an increase of more than 15% for any two-year period. If a taxpayer's real property tax liability increases by more than 15%, the assessor and collector must apply a tax credit equal to the amount that exceeds that 15% increase. This bill requires the physical inspection of a property required to increase the assessed valuation of a parcel of real property by more than 15% since the last assessment to be completed prior to July 1 of the reassessment year. (Section 137.115) This bill requires an assessor to provide any third-party documents or reports that were relied upon in the computation of a property's assessed value to the property owner. (Section 137.180) The bill requires assessors to notify a property owner about the method and basis of computation of value for any property that gets an increase in assessed value. (Section 137.355) If cases arising from general reassessment of a property whose assessed valuation increased by at least 15% are not heard and acted upon by the board of equalization by September 30th of an applicable year, the following must occur: (1) The case must be dismissed; (2) The assessor?s increased assessed valuation must be voided; and (3) The previous assessed valuation must be applied instead of the increased assessed valuation. (Section 138.010) If an assessor fails to provide sufficient evidence to prove a physical inspection was performed in an appeal, the assessor?s increased assessed valuation must be voided and the previous assessed valuation must be applied instead of the increased assessed valuation. If a taxpayer submits a written appraisal report prepared by a certified Missouri appraiser to the board of equalization at least five days prior to the scheduled hearing date, the value of the property provided in the certified appraiser?s report must be the property?s presumptive true value in money. (Section 138.060) This bill allows a person who just acquired a real property during an even-numbered year to appeal the assessed value to the State Tax Commission (STC). If the appeal is successful, the STC has the authority to lower the property's assessed value. (Section 138.135) When the STC equalizes the valuation of a class or subclass of property that results in an increase of more than 15%, the increase must be evenly divided between the next reassessment cycles in a way that does not cause an increase of more than 15% for any two-year reassessment period. If a taxpayer's real property tax liability increases by more than 15%, the assessor and collector must apply a tax credit equal to the amount that exceeds that 15% increase. (Section 138.390) If an assessor appeals certain decisions of the STC to a court and the taxpayer prevails, the taxpayer must be awarded costs of appeal and reasonable attorney?s fees. (Section 138.430) Currently, in charter counties and the City of St. Louis, taxpayers can be reimbursed appraisal costs, attorneys fees, and court costs incurred during an appeal to the STC if the taxpayer is successful in the appeal. This bill requires such reimbursements. The bill also increases the maximum amount of fees to be reimbursed from $1,000 to $5,000 for residential property appeals, and from $4,000 to $5,000 for commercial, utility, industrial, railroad, or other subclass three property appeals. (Section 138.434) This bill requires refunds to be issued to taxpayers within 30 days of the date of a determination that the taxpayer is entitled to one. If the collector fails to issue the refund within 30 days, the taxpayer will be entitled to interest on the refund at a rate established by the Director of Revenue. (Section 139.031)
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026

HB2181 Modifies provisions governing candidate filing location for nonpartisan elections
Sponsor Rep. Cecelie Williams (R)
Summary
This bill requires a random drawing to be used to determine the order in which candidates' names will appear on the ballot for all candidates filing in any nonpartisan election for a political subdivision or special district who file a declaration of candidacy on the first day for filing. The bill also requires all candidates filing in a nonpartisan election for a political subdivision or special district to submit declarations of candidacy to the election authority for the city or county in which the political subdivision or special district is located. For any political subdivision or special district located in the jurisdiction of more than one election authority, candidates will file at the election authority with the greatest proportion of the political subdivision or special district's registered voters. This bill is similar to HB 1174 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elections

HB2183 Bans using seclusion to confine a student
Sponsor Rep. Ian Mackey (D)
Summary
This bill requires that beginning in the 2027-28 school year, school districts, charter schools, and publicly contracted private providers stop using seclusion on students as a form of punishment. These provisions do not apply to a special school district as established under Section 162.825, RSMo. Districts and charter schools must adopt a policy that defines and prohibits seclusion. This bill is similar to HB 455 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2185 Modifies provisions governing qualified students who receive Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program grants
Sponsor Rep. Ian Mackey (D)
Summary
This bill modifies definitions for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship program to include in the definition of qualified students those students that are enrolled in a early childhood education program and allows for scholarships granted under the program to be expended for early childhood education programs at a qualified school. This bill is similar to HB 1338 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2189 Establishes a five-year motor vehicle registration option for motor vehicles with a model year of manufacture that is less than six years old
Sponsor Rep. Bob Bromley (R)
Summary
HB 2189 -- MOTOR VEHICLE REGISTRATION (Bromley) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Government Efficiency Beginning January 1, 2027, the Director of the Department of Revenue will be authorized to issue to owners of motor vehicles with a model year of manufacture less than six years, other than as provided in the bill, the option of a five-year registration period if the fee collected is equal to the annual registration fee plus a pro rata amount for the additional four years of the five-year registration, and presentation of all documentation otherwise required by law for vehicle registration. The bill repeals the provision of law which requires that vehicles manufactured as an even-numbered model year must be renewed each even-numbered calendar year and that vehicles manufactured as an odd-numbered model year must be renewed each odd-numbered calendar year. This bill is similar to HCS HB 247 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026

HB2190 Establishes provisions relating to summer camps
Sponsor Rep. Jim Murphy (R)
Summary
This bill requires a person or organization operating a summer camp in Missouri to establish and retain onsite a site-specific emergency plan addressing certain situations, specified in the bill, and to ensure that the summer camp employees are certified in operating equipment used in any aquatic activity by the summer camp. At least 50% of the camp counselors and any director employed by the camp must be trained in CPR and in the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED). All camp counselors must be subjected to a criminal background check. The bill requires all aquatic activities offered by a summer camp and any related equipment to be inspected annually by the relevant state department, including the Department of Health and Senior Services, the Department of Public Safety, and the Department of Conservation. Local agencies can complete the inspections if the standards employed by the local agencies are substantially similar to state standards. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) must maintain a publicly-available list of all licensed summer camps in the state and any complaints made against any of those summer camps. The camps must maintain records of all inspections of the aquatic activities. It is unlawful for a person or organization to establish, maintain, or operate a summer camp that has not been licensed under the provisions of this bill, and any person or organization that violates the provisions of the bill will be guilty of a class C misdemeanor for a first offense starting May 1, 2028, and will be assessed a fine of up to $750 will be guilty of a class A misdemeanor and assessed a fine of up to $2,000 per day, not to exceed $10,000, for any subsequent offense. The bill authorizes DESE to create any necessary rules and regulations for the administration of the provisions of this bill. This bill is similar to HB 1536 and HB 1377 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2192 Promotes DEI initiatives in public institutions
Sponsor Rep. Kem Smith (D)
Summary
This bill authorizes public institutions to establish and fund diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Such initiiatives include: (1) DEI positions, offices, and programs; (2) Inclusive curriculum and antibias training; and (3) DEI statements and voluntary employee-engagement efforts. The bill requires that DEI initiatives not be prohibited, defunded, or restricted and authorizes the Missouri Commission on Human Rights to receive and investigate complaints of any violations, recommend measures to reinstate programs, and remedy any such violations.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2195 Establishes the "Missouri Integrated Safe Driving Program"
Sponsor Rep. Rodger Reedy (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 18 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2195. This bill creates the "Missouri Integrated Safe Driving Program" and provides that the Program will inform pupils about requirements for obtaining driving permits, emphasis on the knowledge, attitudes, habits, and skills necessary to safely operate a vehicle, instruct on distracted driving and traffic stops, and provide data on driver safety and risky behavior. The Program will also provide instructions on safety concerns relating to pedestrians, commercial motor vehicles, motorcycles and potentially hazardous encounters on the road. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will receive and vet lessons from districts and professional organizations that will integrate the tenants of the safe driving program into courses that students are taking. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year districts can adopt a plan to implement and use lessons. The instruction does not require physical operation of a vehicle and the bill does not prohibit schools from offering additional driver education courses. This bill is similar to HCS HB 248 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will have zero fiscal impact as it merely requires the creation of lessons on driver safety that can be integrated into the school curriculum. Having better, safer teen drivers is important as they are currently at the most risk for fatal accidents. Adding additional traffic law compliance pieces and a focus on pedestrian and motorcycle safety is also important. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Reedy; Kimberly St Clair, Doc Dash Global, Inc; Jackson Hotaling, Missourians For Responsible Transportation; Nicholas Chabarria, AAA Missouri; Deanna Rhodes-Widmer; Joe Widmer, Freedom of Road Riders, Inc.; Missouri Insurance Coalition; and ABATE for Missouri; OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that in the last three years there as been a decrease in traffic fatalities but teen drivers are still the leading contributors with 12% of fatal crashes. Teen drivers only have, at times, 48 months of experience and often make poor decisions. Education is important and this is a fiscally efficient effort that can be beneficial. Testifying in person on the bill was Joe Jones, Missouri Department of Transportation. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2196 Modifies the "Show MO Act" tax credit caps for qualified motion media production projects
Sponsor Rep. Martin Jacobs (D)
Summary
For tax years beginning January 1, 2027, this bill changes the amount of tax credits authorized for film or series production from $8 million per year for film production and $8 million per year for series production to $16 million per year total to be used for either film production or series production. The bill allows tax credits to be carried forward for five tax periods, and all credits must be claimed within 10 tax periods from when the project was certified by the Department of Economic Development. This bill is similar to HB 1499 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2197 Modifies provisions governing school administrator evaluations and contracts
Sponsor Rep. Martin Jacobs (D)
Summary
This bill defines a "building-level administrator" as a school official who supervises other licensed staff and may be a principal or an assistant principal. The bill requires that a building-level administrator evaluation be conducted using research-based evaluation tools that align with best practices and the evaluation must be based on multiple rating categories that include student growth and assessment data as a factor in performance ratings. This bill provides schools with direction on contracts for building-level administrators, including that a renewal and nonrenewal notice must be given to the administrator by February 15th in the year the contract would expire. An administrator whose contract is renewed must accept or reject the contract within 15 business days. Administrator contracts cannot be nonrenewed without the administrator having at least one evaluation and being provided with written cause. Cause for nonrenewal includes unsatisfactory performance on an annual evaluation, violation of school policy or state law, or conduct detrimental to the operation of the school. An administrator that receives a nonrenewal has rights as specified in the bill, including the right to a hearing and an appeal. This bill is similar to HB 1365 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/16/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2126

HB2204 Creates provisions requiring the reporting of expenditures with intent to influence public opinion
Sponsor Rep. Don Mayhew (R)
Summary
This bill states that if a "sponsoring entity", as defined in the bill, pays for, produces, or authorizes a public communication that advocates a political, social, or ideological position; or if the sponsoring entity promotes or organizes protest activity; the sponsoring entity must clearly and conspicuously include within the communication the following statement: "Paid for by (name of sponsoring entity)", followed by the entity's city and state of business. If the public communication is in the form of an audio or video message, the statement must be spoken or displayed at the beginning or end of the communication. For online or digital materials, the statement must appear in a location readily viewable by the public. The provisions of this bill does not apply to: (1) Personal or spontaneous social media posts made by private individuals without payment for distribution; (2) Genuine news coverage or editorial content not controlled by the sponsoring entity; or (3) Internal communications distributed solely to members or employees of an organization. The Missouri Ethics Commission will administer and enforce the provisions of this bill, as specified in the bill. A sponsoring entity that fails to include the required disclaimer is subject to the same civil penalties imposed upon campaign committees under Missouri campaign finance disclosure law in Chapter 130, RSMo. If a sponsoring entity provides compensation to one or more persons who participate in protest activity the sponsoring entity must file a report with the Commission in the same manner and form as a report required of a campaign committee or political action committee and include information, as specified in the bill. The reports must be filed within seven days after the compensated protest activity occurs or, if the total expenditures exceed $5,000, within 48 hours. All filed reports under this provision will be considered public records and available for inspection, as specified in the bill. Any person may file a complaint with the Commission alleging that a sponsoring entity has violated these provisions. Knowingly concealing or misrepresenting the source of compensation will be a Class A misdemeanor. Any person providing credible evidence of a violation must be protected from retaliation, and the identity of the person will remain confidential. Nothing in this bill shall: (1) Restrict or condition the right of any person to assemble, speak, or protest under their First Amendment rights; (2) Regulate personal, unpaid expression by individuals; (3) Require a protester to display or communicate any government-mandated message; or (4) Authorize the regulation of protest activity based on content, viewpoint, or the identity of participants.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2205 Modifies provisions relating to income tax on retirement income from private and public sources
Sponsor Rep. Don Mayhew (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Pensions by a vote of 7 to 3 with 2 members voting present. This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, 100% of any retirement allowance from any privately funded source and 100% of retirement benefits from sources other than privately funded sources received by each taxpayer must be subtracted from their Missouri adjusted gross income. This bill is similar to HB 426 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill is very simple and it eliminates income tax of public and private retirement income. This is similar to legislation in Iowa and Illinois. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Mayhew OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Pensions

HB2209 Modifies provisions governing civics instruction in schools
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
Currently, students must take specific instruction in high school relating to the government of Missouri and the United States and pass an exam as provided before they may graduate or receive a diploma. This bill requires that this instruction occur over four semesters or a substantially equivalent length of time and that the required testing occur only after the instruction has been completed. This bill is similar to HB 1030 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2210 Establishes a fund for matching school district expenditures of reserve moneys to increase teacher salaries
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Matching Grants for Teachers Plan" and establishes within the State Treasury the "Matching Grants for Teachers Plan Fund". The purpose of the Plan will be to provide a grant match of up to $1 million for any school district that uses the district's reserves to increase teacher salaries. The bill provides guidance to districts to prevent district reserves from being exhausted and sets forth criteria that must be met in order to qualify for the grant. This bill is similar to HB 944 (2025) and HCS HB 1810 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2214 Modifies tax incentives for qualified companies to promote industrial manufacturing and infrastructure projects
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
Currently, the Department of Economic Development (DED) may reserve a portion of the Missouri Works program award benefits prior to the completion of job creation requirements until June 30, 2025, at which point such provision is set to expire. This bill removes the expiration date. Currently, DED can award a refundable tax credit to a qualified company receiving Missouri Works benefits in lieu of the retention of withholding tax if the qualified company is already retaining withholding tax under a job training program. This bill allows the refundable tax credits to be awarded to a qualified company that is retaining withholding tax if it is located in an advanced industrial manufacturing (AIM) zone or a targeted industrial manufacturing enhancement (TIME) zone. Current law limits the total annual amount of Missouri Works tax credits to $106 million, and limits the annual amount of withholding tax that may be retained to $75 million, for a total of $181 million in program benefits per fiscal year. Beginning July 1, 2027, DED can award any amount of tax credits and withholding tax benefits, provided that the total amount authorized does not exceed $181 million for retention and creation of new jobs by qualified companies; an additional $10 million in tax credits for the completion of infrastructure projects connected to the creation or retention of jobs; and an additional $10 million in tax credits for a qualified manufacturing company based on a manufacturing capital investment. This bill is similar to HB 990 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2215 Authorizes an income tax deduction for amounts paid towards tangible personal property taxes
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, a qualified taxpayer will be allowed a deduction from the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income in an amount equal to 100% of all tangible personal property taxes actually paid by the qualified taxpayer in a given tax year on all tangible personal property taxes owed. The taxpayer may choose, instead, to take the amount as an itemized deduction on his or her state income tax return. Only the amounts of personal property taxes actually paid by the taxpayer qualify for the deduction and only if the amounts are paid during the tax year for which this deduction is claimed. A deduction can not be claimed for the amount of tangible personal property tax that has been or is used in obtaining a state tax credit, exemption, subtraction, or a different deduction. This bill will sunset six years after the effective date unless reauthorized by an act of the General Assembly. This bill is similar to HCS HB 859 (2025); HB 1812 (2024); and HB 1097 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/25/2026
H - Committee hearing cancelled - 1/26/26 - 4:30 pm - HR 5 - House-Ways and Means

HB2216 Establishes the "Missouri Gives Tax Credit Act", authorizing tax credits for certain contributions to permanent endowment funds held by qualified community foundations
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Gives Tax Credit Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, a taxpayer can claim a tax credit in an amount equal to 25% of a contribution made as an endowment gift to a permanent endowment fund. The credits cannot be refundable or carried forward to any subsequent tax year, nor can they be assigned, transferred, sold, or otherwise conveyed. The cumulative amount of credits awarded to a single taxpayer cannot exceed $100,000 per tax year. The cumulative amount of credits to all taxpayers cannot exceed $5 million per tax year, and if such total of claimed credits is exceeded, the credits must be allowed based on the order in which they are claimed. Of this cumulative amount of $5 million to all taxpayers per year, 25% must be reserved for endowment gifts that do not exceed the small-gift maximum of $25,000. The cumulative amount of contributions to any specific foundation must not exceed $3 million per tax year. Each taxpayer claiming a credit must file a receipt and affidavit with their income tax return verifying the amount contributed as an endowment gift. The provisions of this bill sunset six years after its effective date, unless reauthorized. This bill is similar to HB 1181 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2217 Establishes transparency requirements for textbooks and curricula
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Charlie Kirk Viewpoint Diversity and Transparency Act". Beginning in the 2026-27 school year, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education(DESE) will develop an easy-to- search database tool that provides access to the course syllabus, curricula, and textbook information for each school district in the State. School districts must submit updates every six months and DESE will update and maintain the tool monthly. Specific information required for each item is provided in the bill and includes internet links to curriculum and bibliographic information for textbooks. The bill also requires that public institutions of higher education provide access to information about college textbooks and materials used in courses offered by the institutions. Each institution must establish an easy-to-search database tool that will provide access to the course syllabus and textbook information for each course of study. Faculty members must update the database and institutions must update at least every six months. Protections for copyright are also provided in the bill. This bill is similar to HB 1450 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2226 Adds required staff hours to implement a new program to the list of required components of a fiscal note
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
This bill requires fiscal notes prepared by the Oversight Division of the Committee on Legislative Research to include an estimate of the employee hours required to implement any new program established in the legislation.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Government Efficiency

HB2229 Authorizes the "Missouri No Tax on Car Loan Interest Tax Credit", relating to a tax credit for certain new motor vehicle loan interest payments
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
HB 2229 -- WITHDRAWN
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/02/2026
H - Withdrawn

HB2230 Establishes provisions relating to instructional methods in schools
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 2230 & 2978 -- INSTRUCTIONAL METHODS IN SCHOOLS (Byrnes) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education This bill creates the "Student Screen-Time Standards Act" and provides definitions for "instructional technology" and before the end of the 2027-28 school year, requires that school districts and charter schools have a policy on screen time and the use of instructional technology for students in grades Kindergarten through five. The bill requires that schools limit the use of screen time and the use of instructional technology both during school hours and as assignments or on school devices after the school day. The policy must provide a process for parents to request information about limits on their child's screen time and instructional technology use and districts must use research, evidence, and information to develop the policy based on best practices. This bill requires parental notification of the policy annually and schools must publish the board policy relating to the use of screen time and instructional technology on the district website. The bill exempts virtual instruction programs from the requirements of this section. This bill directs the Literacy Advisory Council under Section 186.080, RSMo, to provide school districts and the State Board of Education advice on the inclusion of instruction and assessment of cursive writing and reading including the development of a model policy on cursive. The bill directs the Commissioner of Education to establish the "Framework on Classroom Use of Screens Council" or "FOCUS Council" that will consist of 12 to 15 members appointed by the Commissioner. The Council is directed to meet four times a year in the initial year and at least two times annually after that with the purpose of reviewing best practices regarding screen use and the use of technology in instruction and providing related policy provisions. The bill outlines best practices and policies that must be included and directs the council to submit a report containing the Council's actions and policy proposals to the State Board of Education, the Governor, and the Joint Committee on Education on or before July 1, 2027 and updated every two years annually after that.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2234 Requires counties to report and transfer unclaimed surplus proceeds from real property tax sales to the unclaimed property division of the state treasurer after 3 years
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Tax Reform by a vote of 8 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2234. Currently, surplus proceeds from tax sales become a permanent school fund of the county if they are not distributed or called for as part of a redemption or collector's deed issuance after three years. This bill requires such surplus proceeds to be transferred to the Unclaimed Property Division of the Office of State Treasurer instead. The bill requires counties to notify the former owner of the property of the transfer and the person's right to reclaim the money within 30 days after the county makes such transfer. This bill requires the county commission to issue payment of the surplus funds to the entitled party within 60 days of receiving the proof of entitlement to those funds. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill addresses individuals who are forced out of their home due to taxes, their home sells at auction for more than the taxes that were owed, and they do not collect that surplus within three years. Those in support of the bill state those uncollected funds go to the county school fund to use after the three years pass, and this bill reroutes the uncollected funds to the Unclaimed Property Division so the surplus can remain recoverable by the former homeowner. Supporters say collectors are not always notifying former homeowners when their homes sell for more than taxes owed, and this bill updates those notification standards. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Byrnes; and Tamara Rucker. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/01/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2238 Creates the "Hayes Act" governing school meals
Sponsor Rep. Marty Joe Murray (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Hayes Act". The bill requires all schools, as the term "school" is defined in the bill, to provide a free lunch to each student who qualifies for a reduced price lunch under the National School Lunch Program administered by the United States Department of Agriculture. Subject to appropriation, the State Board of Education will reimburse schools for their share of the cost of providing free lunches. Schools must determine which students may be eligible for free or reduced price lunch under the National School Lunch Program and provide information and assistance to parents and guardians for purposes of filling out applications for the Program. Schools will not publicly identify or stigmatize students who are eligible for the assistance. This bill creates the "School Meals Fund", which must be used to reimburse schools for the costs of providing free lunches as specified in the bill. The State Board of Education will promulgate rules to implement the program, including the process by which schools may apply for reimbursement. This bill is similar to SB 131 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2242 Provides a state supplement for public schools to hire a school nurse and a mental health professional
Sponsor Rep. Yolanda Young (D)
Summary
This bill establishes financial supplements for public schools to employ school nurses and mental health professionals. School districts must apply to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). A school may also use the financial supplement for telehealth nursing or mental health services. Preference is given to schools demonstrating the greatest need based on criteria specified by the Department. The bill creates the "School Nurse Financial Supplement Fund" and the "School Mental Health Professional Financial Supplement Fund", and requires DESE to create rules ensuring that positions funded with supplement money only perform duties associated with the job title, and preference be given to schools that demonstrate the greatest need. This bill is similar to HB 355 (2025), HB 2858 (2024), and to HB 1348 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2245 Requires a state agency to repeal two existing rules before enacting a new one
Sponsor Rep. Bryant Wolfin (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits a rule proposed by a department, agency, commission, or board from taking effect unless the entity proposing the rule also repeals at least two existing rules. This bill is similar to HB 319 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2247 Reduces and eliminates the personal income tax over a period of 10 years
Sponsor Rep. Bryant Wolfin (R)
Summary
This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the percentage of the personal income tax rates must be reduced annually by one-eleventh of the total percent of each tax rate imposed upon each tax bracket. Beginning January 1, 2037, the personal income tax rates for each tax bracket must be zero, and the personal income tax must be eliminated.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2249 Establishes provisions relating to allergy prevention and responses in child care facilities
Sponsor Rep. Anthony Ealy (D)
Summary
This bill adds child care facilities to the list of authorized entities for which a physician may prescribe an epinephrine delivery device. The bill also establishes "Elijah's Law" and requires licensed child care providers to adopt a policy on allergy prevention and response, with priority given to addressing deadly food-borne allergies. The policy must contain elements specified in the bill and be adopted before July 1, 2028. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must develop a model policy or policies on allergy prevention and response before July 1, 2027. This bill is similar to HCS HBs 222 & 580 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/12/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2365

HB2251 Establishes the "Missouri Free School Meals Program" to reimburse schools for providing free breakfasts and lunches to all students
Sponsor Rep. Jaclyn Zimmermann (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Free School Meals Program" to reimburse schools for providing free breakfasts and lunches to all students, regardless of whether those students are eligible for free meals under Federal guidelines. The bill requires a school that participates in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National School Lunch Program but is not eligible to have all student meals reimbursed at the free rate through the USDA Community Eligibility Provision to participate in the Missouri Free School Meals Program. Such a school must provide to all students at no cost up to two meals per school day, with a maximum of one free breakfast and one free lunch. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must reimburse a school that participates in the Missouri Free School Meals Program in an amount equal to the difference between the Federal reimbursement rate for a free meal and the actual reimbursement received by the school. This bill is similar to HB 873 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2252 Establishes the "Missouri Teachers Classroom Supply Assistance Program"
Sponsor Rep. Jaclyn Zimmermann (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Teachers Classroom Supply Assistance Program", which, beginning with the 2027-28 school year, requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to provide money to each school district and charter school specifically for teachers to purchase classroom materials and school supplies. The Department must calculate the amount for school districts and charter schools based on the average daily attendance of resident pupils enrolled in the previous year and distribute such amount to each district and school before August 1st of each year. School districts and charter schools will provide each teacher in their district with a debit card issued specifically for this Program, and with a tax exempt number. The Department must determine all necessary procedures and requirements for use of the cards. Any teacher using the card must submit receipts for all purchases to be maintained by the school district or charter school for five years. This bill is similar to HB 874(2025); HB 1505 (2024); and HB 235 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2253 Exempts the retail sale of food from state sales and use tax
Sponsor Rep. Jaclyn Zimmermann (D)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, there will be no state sales or use tax levied or imposed on any retail food. The tax exemption does not apply to local sales and use tax. This bill is similar to HB 872 (2025); and HB 2174 (2024) .
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2271 Prohibits commercial services that provide a user with work submitted for educational credit in the user's name
Sponsor Rep. Ed Lewis (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits organizations or individuals from advertising selling, or distributing work products such as assigned tasks, assignments, and exams, among others as outlined in the bill, with the knowledge that the work product is a violation of the rights of the sponsor, defined to include public schools or universities or any organization that issues credentials or certification. The bill prohibits an organization or individual from selling or advertising for sale completed tasks for a fee if they would be submitted as a learner's own work and restricts the selling or distribution of confidential exams or assignments. Penalties outlined in the bill include up to a $5,000 fine for each violation or misdemeanor or felony charges for multiple offenses, along with civil penalties for damages, legal fees, and other costs. The bill provides exceptions for tutorial help or research material allowed by the school or university and authorizes courts to preserve the secrecy of any confidential exam or assignment. This bill is similar to HB 1167 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2272 Modifies provisions governing certificates of license to teach
Sponsor Rep. Ed Lewis (R)
Summary
Currently, a teacher's certification can be disciplined or non- renewed if charges are filed by a local board of education with the State Board of Education stating that the teacher has annulled their contract without consent. This bill removes annulment of a contract as a reason for a certification disciplinary action.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2274 Adopts the "Interstate Teacher Mobility Compact"
Sponsor Rep. Ed Lewis (R)
Summary
HB 2274 -- INTERSTATE TEACHER MOBILITY COMPACT (Lewis) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education This bill establishes the "Missouri Interstate Teacher Mobility Compact" to create a collective regulatory framework that has a goal to support teachers and provide a new path for licensure. The bill aims to simplify and accelerates the process for qualified teachers to get licensed and employed when moving across state lines. The bill provides that a member state must grant an equivalent unencumbered license to an applicant who holds an unencumbered eligible teaching license from another member state, pending a determination of equivalency. The bill specifies a pathway for active military members and eligible military spouses to receive an equivalent license, even if their current license is not unencumbered. The Compact is intended to accomplish the following: (1) Create a streamlined pathway to licensure mobility; (2) Support the relocation of eligible military spouses; (3) Facilitate the exchange of licensure, investigative, and disciplinary information between states; (4) Remove barriers to hiring qualified out-of-state teachers and; (5) Support teacher retention in the profession. The bill indicates that licensure under the Compact is for the initial granting of a license in a receiving state and requires participating states to maintain an updated list of eligible licenses and career and technical education licenses that the state is willing to consider for equivalency. The Compact does not prevent states from awarding certificates based on additional criteria, participating in additional agreements, exchanging of names of teachers whose licensure is subject to adverse action, or participating with nonmember states. States may also investigate and discipline teachers if the need arises. The bill also creates the "Interstate Teacher Mobility Compact Commission", a joint public agency composed of one delegate from all member states, to administer the Compact, enforce its rules, and manage the exchange of information. The Commission has the power to establish a code of ethics and create bylaws. Additional authorizations for the Commission are specified in the bill and the Commission must meet at least once annually. The executive committee of the Commission is composed of eight members and the Committee's duties include preparing the budget and monitoring and reporting on the compliance of the member states among other duties as specified in the bill. The bill requires that meetings of the Commission and the Committee be open to the public except for closed, nonpublic meetings as specified. The bill provides details on the financing of the Commission and provides a qualified immunity, defense, and indemnification provision for specified members of the Commission. The bill provides the Commission rulemaking authority, however, if a majority of the legislatures of the member states rejects a rule, by enactment of a statute or resolution in the same manner used to adopt the compact within four years of the date of adoption of the rule, the rule will have no further effect in any member state. The Commission may terminate membership if there is a default on the performance of a state to fulfill it's obligations or responsibilities after the Commission has provided written notice and provided training and specific technical assistance. The Compact will be in effect after 10 states have enacted it into law even if after a review, termination, or withdrawal causes a state to no longer be a member and the total membership is less than 10. The bill provides for severability if the Compact is determined to be contrary to a state or the U.S. Constitution.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

HB2276 Authorizes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption" relating to a property tax exemption for certain veterans
Sponsor Rep. Will Jobe (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption" which provides a tiered property tax exemption system for veterans with disabilities. The exemptions are based on a disability percentage, certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, an annual exemption will be given for a property that is used as a qualified residence owned by a veteran with a disability, limited to the amounts as follows: (1) For veterans with service-connected disability of 50% or more but less than 70%, the annual exemption is $2,500; (2) For veterans with a service-connected disability of 70% or more but less than 100%, the annual exemption is $5,000; (3) For veterans with service-connected disability of 100%, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the qualified residence; and (4) For a taxpayer who is the surviving spouse of a veteran whose death was determined to be service-connected and who is certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as a recipient of dependency and indemnity compensation under Federal law, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the qualified residence. If a surviving spouse of a veteran sells the qualified residence, an amount may be transferred to his or her new residence as long as it is used as his or her primary residence and he or she does not remarry. No exemption will be allowed for the tax year in which the surviving spouse remarries. The bill requires each taxpayer that is granted the exemption to reapply on an annual basis unless the veteran has a service- connected disability rating of 100% and is deemed permanently and totally disabled, as specified in the bill. The provisions of this bill sunset six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 552 (2025) and HB 1419(2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/01/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2306

HB2278 Establishes the "Interscholastic Athletic Activities Appeals Board" within the department of elementary and secondary education to hear appeals after the activities association appeals process has been exhausted
Sponsor Rep. Bennie Cook (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Government Efficiency by a vote of 11 to 7. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2278 & 2403. This bill requires that beginning in the 2027-2028 school year, any appeals of decisions made by an statewide activities association can by heard by the "Interscholastic Athletic Activities Appeals Board", an appeals board appointed by the Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The term of office of each director will be four years, with the initial appointments staggered such that two members will serve terms of two years and three members will serve terms of four years. The bill defines an "activities association" as a nonprofit statewide organization that facilitates interscholastic activities for secondary school students, and whose members include at least one public school district that pays any fees to the association, including any fees relating to membership in the association or participation in any activities facilitated by the association. This bill requires that once the activities association's appeals process is exhausted, the appeals board will hear all subsequent appeals. If a decision is needed within 48 hours, then an appeal can be made directly to the appeals board. Hearings on such appeals can be conducted in-person, over the telephone, video conferencing, or other remote communication. The appeals board can hear the following appeals: (1) Appeals relating to transfer students deemed to be for athletic purposes; (2) Appeals relating to athletic contests; and (3) Appeals relating prior decisions made by an activities association that resulted in the student's disqualification or prohibition from participating in any athletic activity. Decisions made by the appeals board are final and the activities association must abide by that decision. The bill requires the activities association to prepare an annual report and present to the House and Senate committee chosen by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tem of the senate within the first 30 days of the legislative session This bill is similar to SB 863 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that MSHSAA is the only real option for schools wanting to participate in statewide high school athletics, but once MSHSAA makes a final decision, there is often no appeal and no clear reason for their decision. Supporters further state that this bill will promote transparency and accountability. Because public schools have to pay fees to and follow the rules made by MSHSAA, mistakes made by this organization shouldn't have to be addressed in a court of law. Allowing an organization to set and enforce rules, and then to also allow the same organization to handle any appeals upon those enforced rules, can create a conflict of interest or bias. Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Cook. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that MSHSAA is an unincorporated voluntary association whose membership includes public schools who can vote on rule changes every year and who came together to found the association 100 years ago. Circumstances change over time, and when a current rule has an impact on students that was not contemplated years ago and therefore no longer serves a useful purpose, there exists a democratic process to address that situation. Opponents further state that there are already in place advisory committees made up of coaches and other representatives with expert-level knowledge who currently apply that knowledge and expertise in the very types of situations that this bill seeks to address. Testifying in person against the bill were Dr. Jennifer Rukstad, MSHSAA; and Missouri Council of School Administrators. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/14/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2295 Modifies provisions relating to tax credits
Sponsor Rep. David Casteel (R)
Summary
HB 2295 -- WITHDRAWN
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/07/2026
H - Withdrawn

HB2303 Requires the department of elementary and secondary education to develop a curriculum on personal finance to be used by school districts
Sponsor Rep. Philip Oehlerking (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Financial Institutions by a vote of 14 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2303 & 2867. Under the provisions of this bill, all school districts, starting in the 2027-28 school year, must require students to complete a one-half unit of credit in personal finance in order to graduate high school. The instruction regarding personal finance is outlined in the bill. Schools can waive the requirement for certain transfer students, as specified in the bill. This bill requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to convene a work group to develop and recommend academic performance standards relating to the one-half unit of credit in personal finance. Members of the work group must include educators who provide instruction in personal finance, a representative from the Department, members of the banking industry, or other groups specified in the bill, with at least 25% of the members comprised of educators. The State Board of Education (SBE) must adopt and implement academic performance standards for the 2027-28 school year and all subsequent school years. Every five years, the SBE will review the academic performance standards to determine whether they should be updated to reflect trends and best practices in the current economy. This bill is similar to HB 1180 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will help educate people on fraud and lending, credit uses, financial processes, insurance, and taxes, all with the goal of allowing people to make financial decisions earlier and avoid financial hardship. Implementing this education in the public education system will help Missouri's economy, tax revenue, and citizens in the long run. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Oehlerking; Missouri Bankers Association; Mortgage Bankers Association of Missouri; Missouri Consumer Credit Coalition; Missouri Credit Union Association; Kyerra Johnson; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/09/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2304 Establishes written parental consent requirements for individualized education programs (IEPs)
Sponsor Rep. Philip Oehlerking (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 10 to 4 with 2 voting present. This bill requires public schools that serve students with an individualized education program (IEP) to implement parental consent procedures. Written parental consent must be obtained and maintained for initial placement, placement changes, removal of service, or the reduction or addition of service minutes by more than 25% as specified in the bill. If the parents and local educational agency (LEA) only reach an agreement on certain IEP services or interim placement, the child's new IEP will only be implemented in the areas of agreement with the current services remaining unchanged unless the local education agency follows procedures specified in the bill. The bill states that if consent is not provided within ten school days, the LEA and the parents must include an additional addendum to a child's IEP on areas of disagreement and provide resolution for the disagreement within 20 days with the option of an additional 20 days with consent from both parties as long as progress or additional agreements are reached. Dispute resolution options are provided and can occur upon request of either the school district or the parent of the child. If a child is identified as eligible for special education services, the parents have the right to schedule a visit for any program proposed for their child as long as that visit does not interfere with instruction. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must adopt a parental consent form, as specified in the bill, that each school district will provide to parents. Districts may not proceed with implementation of a student's IEP without the parental consent form completed except as provided in the bill. The bill has a delayed effective date of July 1, 2027. This bill is similar to HCS HB 477 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that special education and regular teachers must cooperate in all decisions and planning, not just at the initial stage and this bill provides for on-going communication with parents to ensure that the needs of students are foremost in the considerations. The district is not prohibited from having students removed for behavioral issues and a "no change" that takes place under 10 days would not necessarily require parental input. Language like this bill will help alleviate the necessity to litigate changes as there will be more opportunities to communicate about changes. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Oehlerking; Paraquad; Jonny Fariole; Missouri NEA; Missouri Disability Empowerment Foundation; and Jacob Wilcutt OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/27/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2305 Establishes provisions governing electronic bid procurement systems used by political subdivisions
Sponsor Rep. Philip Oehlerking (R)
Summary
This bill requires political subdivisions undertaking construction projects to allow for electronic bid submission by contractors and vendors. A notice advertising the bid is required to be published on an online portal, such as the political subdivision's website, and through an electronic medium, such as a public online bid platform. Information required to be included on this notice is provided in the bill. Political subdivisions are required to implement security measures for this process, as provided in the bill. Political subdivisions accepting electronic bids must provide an electronic receipt to the bidder at the time of submission. The Office of Administration will develop guidelines to assist political subdivisions in implementing the electronic bid process. This bill is similar to HB 1429 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2306 Authorizes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans' Homestead Exemption" relating to a disabled veteran residential real property assessed value exemption
Sponsor Rep. Philip Oehlerking (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 18 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2306, 2276 & 2089. This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Exemption" which provides a tiered property tax exemption system for veterans with disabilities. The exemptions are based on a disability percentage, certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, an annual exemption will be given for a property that is used as a qualified residence owned by a veteran with a disability, limited to the amounts as follows: (1) For veterans with a service-connected disability of 50% or more but less than 70%, the annual exemption is the first $150,000 of the fair market value; (2) For veterans with a service-connected disability of 70% or more but less than 100%, the annual exemption is the first $250,000 of the fair market value; (3) For veterans with service-connected disability of 100%, the annual exemption is equal to the first $500,000 of the fair market value. The exemption carries over to the benefit of the disabled veteran's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence and permanently resides there. The exemption for a surviving spouse will remain proportional to the disabled veteran's disability rating as of the time of the veteran's passing. If the person awarded the exemption subsequently becomes a resident of a facility licensed under Chapter 198, a Missouri veterans' home, or a facility operated by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, the exemption will continue: (1) If the residence continues to be occupied by the disabled veteran's spouse; or (2) If the residence remains unoccupied but is still owned by the disabled veteran who qualifies for the exemption. The bill requires each taxpayer that is granted the exemption to reapply on an annual basis and provide documentation specified in the bill. This bill is similar to HB 552 and HB 921 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this will provide a benefit that will keep veterans in Missouri. This bill honors veterans and provides some financial relief for their families. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Oehlerking; Missouri National Guard Association; Blake Leitch, Parmele Disability Advocate; Charles Canady; Charles A Sanders; Darrell Tucker; ABATE for Missouri; Dori Lawson; and Andy Davis. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the State doesn't have enough money to do this. This would raise property taxes to make up for loss in tax revenue. Testifying in person against the bill was Arnie Dienoff. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/01/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

HB2311 Modifies provisions relating to the sexual offender registry
Sponsor Rep. Mike Costlow (R)
Summary
Currently, the age of consent for sex is 17 years old. This bill increases the age of consent to 18 years old. Additionally, certain sexual offenses are offenses only when the person who commits the offense is at least four years older than the minor victim. This bill reduces the threshold to at least three years older. This bill amends provisions related to the sex offender registry so that individuals who qualify for exemption from the registry must petition the court to be exempt from registration requirements. Currently, offenders required to register as tier III offenders on the sexual offender registry cannot file a petition to be removed from the registry and are required to register for their lifetime. This bill adds to those required to register for their lifetime, those required to register under federal law, and those who are required to register as a result of an offense that was sexual in nature and committed against a minor or against an incapacitated person. The bill requires the official in charge of a correctional facility, private jail, or mental health facility to enter an offender's registration information into the state's sex offender registration system rather than forwarding the information to the Highway Patrol and the chief law enforcement official of the county or of St. Louis City where the offender will reside upon discharge, parole, or release. If a person is currently a registered sex offender and is detained in a correctional facility, private jail, or mental health institution, the official in charge of the facility, jail, or institution must inform the chief law enforcement official of the county or of St. Louis City where the offender is registered of the offender's release. Before releasing an offender, the official in charge of a facility, jail, or institution must verify whether the offender is currently a registered sex offender and, if so, the chief law enforcement official where the offender is registered must ensure the offender's status is properly updated in the registry. The bill also moves multiple offenses currently listed under the tier I or tier II registration requirements to the tier III registration requirements, and it adds multiple offenses to each of the tiers. All the moved offenses are sexual in nature and involve a minor as the victim. This bill is similar to HB 1592 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/17/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Crime and Public Safety

HB2314 Creates provisions relating to unlawful discrimination in places of public accommodation
Sponsor Rep. Deanna Self (R)
Summary
This bill states that it is an unlawful discriminatory practice for a place of public accommodation to: (1) Designate any changing room or restroom, other than a family restroom, for use by persons of both sexes; or (2) Allow any person to use a changing room or restroom that has been designated for use exclusively by persons of the opposite sex. The bill further states that a place or business is not exempt from these provisions because that place or business collects membership fees or dues from people who make use of any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, services, or privileges made available in the place or business. Such a place or business is deemed a "place of public accommodation" as long as the place or business accepts for membership anyone who pays fees or dues and the place or business otherwise meets the statutory definition of place of public accommodation. This bill also allows for the filing of a civil claim of unlawful discriminatory practice under these provisions. This bill is similar to HB 542 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2317 Requires the observation of Black History Month in school districts
Sponsor Rep. Mark Sharp (D)
Summary
This bill requires public schools to conduct educational programs and activities to honor the struggles and triumphs of Black Americans for at least one class period in the month of February. This bill is similar to HB 649 (2025); HB 1475 (2024); and HB 112 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2319 Expands the definition of special victim to include sports officials at a sporting event
Sponsor Rep. Brad Pollitt (R)
Summary
This bill expands the definition of "special victim" under Section 565.002, RSMo, to include sports officials at a sporting event while performing their duties as sports officials or as a direct result of those duties. This bill is similar to HB 379 (2025) and HB 1847 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2329 Reduces the assessment percentage of tangible personal property over a period of years
Sponsor Rep. Richard West (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 6 to 4. This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the percentage of the true value in money at which personal property is assessed will be reduced over a period of three years until it will be assessed at 18% of its true value in money. This bill is similar to HB 903 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill cuts personal property taxes for taxpayers. Those in support of the bill state that personal property taxes are felt more because taxpayers must pay that tax out of pocket. Supporters say this bill gives districts time to prepare for the reduction and eventual elimination of the personal property tax. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative West; and Americans For Prosperity. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill will devastate local taxing districts, particularly smaller counties. Opponents state that the school districts, hospital districts, and fire districts in small and rural counties will suffer the most because the bill does not provide any mechanisms for these districts to recoup the lost tax revenues. Testifying in person against the bill was Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association; Missouri Association of Counties; Missouri National Education Association; and Missouri Municipal League. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/30/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Ways and Means

HB2331 Allows students to apply sunscreen at school
Sponsor Rep. Mark Boyko (D)
Summary
This bill allows students to possess and self-apply sunscreen or if the student is unable to self-apply a school employee can apply the sunscreen if there is written consent from a parent or guardian. The bill provides an exemption for liability for school employees for adverse reactions to sunscreen application or discontinuation of application.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2335 Modifies provisions governing school employee training requirements
Sponsor Rep. Ann Kelley (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2335 -- SCHOOL EMPLOYEE TRAINING (Kelley) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education Beginning with the 2026-27 school year, this bill modifies the current required training that school employees must receive annually. The bill requires that newly hired employees receive instruction on a variety of topics annually for the first three years of employment, these topics include: school discipline, seclusion and restraint, bleeding control kits, school bullying, employee- student communications, epilepsy and seizure disorders, mandatory reporting, dyslexia and related disorders, youth suicide awareness and prevention, and active shooter and intruder response training. All other employees will be provided training and education on these topics as determined by the school district based on the specific needs of the district and each employee instead of annually. All employees are required to be trained for a minimum of three years for any newly developed trainings required by state law beginning in the 2026-27 school year. Additionally, employees must receive Federal trainings and trainings for specific job requirements as specified. This bill is similar to HCS HB 332 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/30/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

HB2341 Requires certain public schools to offer breakfast after the bell
Sponsor Rep. Raychel Proudie (D)
Summary
This bill requires a public school or charter school to offer "breakfast after the bell" as defined in the bill beginning in the 2026-27 school year if at least 70% of the students are eligible for free or reduced lunch based on the criteria specified in the bill. Any school in which 70% or more of its students who are eligible for free or reduced price meals that are already participating in the School Breakfast Program will not be required to offer breakfast after the bell. If a school initially required to offer breakfast after the bell falls below the 70% threshold, the school must continue to offer breakfast after the bell for two consecutive years and if during the second year the school does not meet the requirements, the school may stop serving breakfast after the bill at the end of the two-year period. Schools must offer breakfast after the bell to all students in the school, including students who arrive late or by a different mode of transportation than most students. Schools may choose a service model that best suits their students, including breakfast in the classroom or breakfast after first period. Schools can not be required to offer breakfast after the bell if the Federal per-meal reimbursements for free or reduced price breakfasts are decreased below 2026 levels or if the program is eliminated by Congress. The bill also requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to notify schools required to offer breakfast after the bell; recognize up to 15 minutes spent by students consuming breakfast as instructional time if the students receive instruction while consuming breakfast in the classroom; assist schools as specified in the bill; collect information as specified in the bill; and submit a report each year on or before December 31st, to the General Assembly on the implementation and effectiveness of the provisions of the bill. This bill is similar to HB 285 (2025); and HB 1899 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2342 Requires all new playground areas and surfaces to comply with the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design and relevant regulations issued by the United States Department of Justice
Sponsor Rep. Raychel Proudie (D)
Summary
This bill requires any new playground area and playground surface constructed by the State or a political subdivision to comply with ADA Standards for Accessible Design. This bill is similar to HB 1244 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/24/2026
H - Voted Do Pass as substituted - House-Children and Families

HB2356 Enacts provisions governing local tax ballot questions submitted by political subdivisions
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits political subdivisions from describing ballot questions that would authorize the issuing of bonds, levy increases, or other tax-supported indebtedness as "no-tax- increase bond issues" or as imposing no financial obligation on taxpayers. The bill requires such questions to include, in plain language: 1) Whether the question would increase, decrease, or maintain the current debt service levy; 2) The estimated dollar impact on the average residential real property in the political subdivision, as calculated by the county assessor and verified by the State Auditor; and 3) A disclosure that bond issuance constitutes a financial obligation for the political subdivision that must be repaid by taxpayers. This bill requires the State Auditor to certify ballot language submitted by a political subdivision prior to the language being placed on the ballot. The auditor will have 30 days to review the language and issue a report. If the auditor determines that the language is misleading or otherwise noncompliant, the political subdivision must revise and resubmit the language prior to certification. The Attorney General can enjoin a political subdivision from placing a question on the ballot if the language wasn't certified by the auditor. If a court finds language to be noncompliant with these requirements, the question will be prohibited from appearing on the ballot, and the political subdivision will be prohibited from placing the question on the ballot again until the following general election cycle. The requirements in this bill are in addition to all other statutory requirements relating to ballots questions submitted to voters by a political subdivision.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elections

HB2360 Authorizes charter counties and counties with an alternative form of government to establish alternative methods for property assessment and taxation
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
This bill allows a county that has adopted a charter form of government to establish alternative methods for assessing real and personal property within the county and calculating property tax levies and revenues within the county. The bill grants additional authority to counties with a charter form of government that decides to establish such alternative methods. This bill provides that a county exercising the authority granted must file an annual report with the State Tax Commission and the State Auditor. This report must summarize the alternative assessment and levy calculation methods and the resulting impact of the alternative methods.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2362 Authorizes the "Disabled Veteran Property Tax Relief Act" relating to a property tax exemption for certain veterans
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 16 to 1. This bill establishes the "Disabled Veteran Property Tax Relief Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, a disabled veteran is granted an annual property tax exemption on his or her primary residence that is proportional to the disabled veteran's disability rating. The proportional amount will be calculated as follows: (1) For disabled veterans with a disability rating of less than 100%, the tax levied upon the primary residence must be reduced by a percentage equal to the veteran's disability rating; and (2) For disabled veterans with a disability rating of 100%, the annual exemption must be equal to 100% of the tax assessed on the primary residence. To verify eligibility, a disabled veteran must do the following no later than April 1st: (1) Submit an application to the local assessor or collector; (2) Include documentation verifying proof of the disability rating, including documentation from the US Department of Veterans Affairs; and (3) Include proof of ownership and occupation of the primary residence. The collector must review applications and determine eligibility of the residential property. This exemption can carry over to the disabled veteran's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence, permanently resides therein, and does not remarry. No exemption will be allowed for a surviving spouse for the tax year in which he or she remarries. The exemption for a surviving spouse must remain proportional to the disabled veteran's disability rating as of the time of the veteran's passing. The exemption can not be transferred or assigned. Knowingly providing false information to obtain the exemption will subject an individual to a penalty twice the amount of the exemption improperly received. The provisions of this bill will sunset six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 921 (2025); HB 552 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that rising property taxes impact disabled veterans and their families across our state. This bill would provide relief to disabled veterans that they have earned through their service and sacrifice. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Schmidt; Tony Laszacs; Missouri National Guard Association; Blake Leitch, Parmele Disability Advocate; Charles Canady; Charles A Sanders; ABATE for Missouri; and Andy Davis. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that Missouri cannot afford to do this right now. The State is currently making cuts to the budget because our revenue is down. This could decimate small towns that rely heavily on these taxes for public services. Testifying in person against the bill was Arnie Dienoff. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/23/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2365 Establishes provisions relating to allergy prevention and responses in child care facilities
Sponsor Rep. Jim Schulte (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Health and Mental Health by a vote of 18 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2365, 2490 & 2249. This bill adds child care facilities to the list of authorized entities for which a physician can prescribe an epinephrine delivery system. The bill also establishes "Elijah's Law" and requires licensed child care providers to adopt a policy on allergy prevention and response, with priority given to addressing deadly food-borne allergies. The policy must contain elements specified in the bill and be adopted before July 1, 2028. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must develop a model policy or policies on allergy prevention and response before July 1, 2027. This bill is similar to HCS HB 222 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that no parent should have to deal with the fear of his or her child not coming home from child care due to a preventable allergic reaction. There is a widespread lack of education on the use of epinephrine delivery systems and the changing technology to make the administration of the system less traumatizing for the child or person having the epinephrine administered to them. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Schulte; Amanda Kearns; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2375 Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Sponsor Rep. Brad Christ (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2375 -- WORKERS' COMPENSATION (Christ) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Insurance Under current law, an injury is compensable if the accident was the prevailing factor in causing both the resulting medical condition and disability. This bill provides that the injury is compensable if the accident was the prevailing factor in causing the injury, the resulting medical condition, the disability, and the need for treatment. The bill modifies the definition of injury due to an occupational disease; injury due to repetitive motion; and the "prevailing factor" definition. In addition, for an employee to receive medical treatment, the accident or occupational disease must be the prevailing factor in causing the injury, the resulting medical condition and the need for treatment. This bill provides that any savings from benefits from the employer or the employer's insurance for liability, and any savings or payments through insurance procured or provided by the employer, will be applied when determining the compensation due and will be deducted from the compensation otherwise due under these provisions. The amount deducted from compensation otherwise due resulting from payments or benefits from an insurance policy will be limited to the portion of such savings equal to the employer's pro rata share of the premium or expense for such policy. This bill requires administrative law judges (ALJ) or the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (LIRC) to have the authority to order employers to make payments only to the medical provider or providers to whom bills are due in cases where they determine the employer is responsible for disputed medical bills. The bill authorizes an employer to file a motion to dismiss a claim for compensation within 180 days of filing a claim, if the Division of Workers' Compensation has not already set the matter for a prehearing conference, mediation conference, or hearing. The employer can file a motion to dismiss the claim, raising one or more grounds provided in the bill. The bill outlines the evidence to be submitted by the parties relating to the issues to be determined at the evidentiary hearing and the timeline for an ALJ to issue an order which is subject to review by the LIRC. The employer can file the motion to dismiss to specifically raise one or more of the following arguments: (1) That the employee did not notify the employer in a timely manner or file the claim in a timely manner; (2) That the employee was not performing work for the employer at the time when the alleged injury occurred; (3) That the employer is not liable due to the employee's intoxication from use of alcohol or controlled substances; or (4) That the claimant was not employed by the employer when the alleged incident occurred. Under current law, a temporary or partial award of compensation can be modified and kept open until a final award can be issued and if the temporary or partial award is not complied with, the compensation amount awarded and unpaid can be doubled in the final award. This bill repeals this penalty language and specifies that the temporary or partial award is subject to review and appeal after the date of the final award. This bill is similar to HCS HB 497 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/15/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-General Laws

HB2379 Modifies provisions relating to sales taxes for early childhood services
Sponsor Rep. Cecelie Williams (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 7 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2379. This bill provides that current law relating to the distribution of sales tax proceeds in St. Louis County must not apply to a tax for the purpose of funding early childhood educational or child care services, and requires that the proceeds must be deposited in the county's "Early Childhood Education and Child Care Fund", which is created by the bill. The bill requires the proceeds of any tax imposed in certain counties or in any city not within a county for the purposes of improving the quality, affordability of, and access to early childhood development programs and child care programs for children aged five years and younger to be deposited into such county’s or city’s Early Childhood Education and Child Care Fund. The administrative control and management of the funds must be by the board of directors. The board of directors must use or disburse the funds in the Early Childhood Education and Child Care Fund to provide and administer programs to improve the quality, affordability, and accessibility of early childhood education and childcare. The funds can also be used for early childhood education services provided by early childhood education service providers and child care providers, as defined in the bill. This bill provides that the board of directors can contract with any provider to provide services, set eligibility rules for the use of the Fund, audit funded entities, and accept gifts, grants, and property for the purpose of early childhood education and child care programs. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill gives counties the ability to dedicate revenue from an existing sales tax to childcare education funds if approved by voters. Those in support of the bill state that this bill addresses the needs related to children's services by using the existing sales tax structure rather than creating a new tax. Supporters say that there is still a gap in access for families who cannot afford childcare, and this bill addresses this crisis in child care by providing another option for localities to provide funding and services for children. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Williams; Denise Wiese, Lemay Child and Family Center; Kids Win Missouri; D. Scott Penman, St. Louis County Children's Services Fund; Greta M. Bax, WEPOWER; Charli Cooksey, WEPOWER; Childcare Aware of Missouri; and Boone County Missouri. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that early childhood education is a net positive, but Missouri is in a childcare crisis due to the thousands of children who lack access to childcare. Testifying in person on the bill was Cassandra Kaufman, St. Louis Mental Heath Board. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/04/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Ways and Means

HB2381 Creates new provisions relating to elections
Sponsor Rep. John Simmons (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits a "government entity", as defined in the bill, from soliciting, accepting, or using funds or in-kind goods or services for election administration if they were donated directly or indirectly by a person other than a government entity. This does not apply to funds or in-kind goods or services of de minimis value. Except as provided in the bill, government entities or "election officers", as that term is defined in the bill, are prohibited from joining the membership of, participating in a program created by, or purchasing services from any entity unless the entity complies with certification retirements described in the bill. The bill outlines the disclosure requirements for government entities or election officers who join or consider joining the membership of such program. The bill prohibits government entities from being members of or participating in programs run by organizations that engage in election administration and receive foreign funding. A violation of the provisions of this bill is a class B misdemeanor. Any Missouri registered voter can bring a cause of action to enforce the provisions of this bill. This bill is similar to SB 896 (2026) and HCS HB 794 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elections

HB2387 Modifies provisions relating to the presidential preference primary
Sponsor Rep. Brad Banderman (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 2387 & 2480 -- The Presidential Preference Primary (Banderman) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elections This bill reinstates the presidential preference primary election, to be held on the first Tuesday in March of each presidential election year. A person who files to be included on the presidential primary ballot is not prohibited from filing as a party candidate for nomination to another office. Specific deadlines for administrative actions by local election authorities and the Secretary of State that are necessary to hold the presidential preference primary are specified in the bill. Candidates will be required to pay a filing fee to the state committee of the established political party on whose ballot they wish to appear. The amount of the fee will be determined by the state committee of each political party. The conduct of the presidential preference primary and the count and canvass of the votes cast must conform as nearly as possible to that prescribed for the primary election for state officers. All costs of the presidential preference primary, except for proportional costs for any political subdivision or special district holding an election on the same day, will be paid by the State. The results of the presidential preference primary will be binding for the purpose of allocating and directing the votes of party delegates and alternate delegates. The political parties must allocate delegates in proportion to the certified statewide and congressional district results of the election, unless a national party rule requires an alternative allocation method, in which case the allocation must conform as nearly as possible to the election results. Delegates will file a written pledge with the Secretary of State affirming that they will vote for the candidate to whom they are bound under for at least the first ballot. A delegate who fails to give or violates the pledge will be deemed to have resigned immediately. An alternate delegate pledged to the same candidate will fill the vacancy. The Secretary of State must certify the results of the presidential preference primary and is authorized to promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this bill. This bill is similar to HB 367 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2390 Modifies provisions governing physical activity in schools
Sponsor Rep. Marty Joe Murray (D)
Summary
This bill establishes "Quinton's Law" and requires school districts and charter schools, beginning in the 2027-28 school year, to provide students in grades K-8 with a minimum of 15 minutes of recess and two daily brain breaks of at least three minutes. Schools may not withhold recess or breaks for disciplinary reasons and the bill provides rulemaking authority to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to provide guidance on allowable activities, professional development for teachers, data reporting, and procedures for waivers under exceptional circumstances.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2392 Establishes the "Missouri Social Media Safety for Minors Act"
Sponsor Rep. Marty Joe Murray (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Social Media Safety for Minors Act". It prohibits a minor who is under 14 years of age from creating or maintaining an account; minors who are 14 years of age and under 16 years of age may hold an account only with the verified consent of a parent or legal guardian. The bill allows for social media platforms to permit the creation of an account, but such platforms must provide parents or guardians with the option to: (1) Access and review account activity; (2) Request deletion of the minor's account; and (3) Limit messaging features between the minor and unverified adult accounts. The bill requires social media platforms to implement a secure age-verification process for all Missouri users prior to the creation of an account, and sets parameters for permissible age- verification techniques. Social media platforms are required to immediately terminate any account found to belong to a person under 14 years of age. If a verified parent or guardian requests deletion of a minor's account, the social media platform must comply within 10 business days of receiving such a request. The bill prohibits social media platforms from: (1) Using addictive or manipulative design features specifically targeting minors; (2) Permitting direct messaging from adults to minors unless the adult is a verified contact; or (3) Serving targeted advertising to minors based on personal data or behavioral profiling. A violation of the provisions of this bill constitutes an unlawful merchandising practice under current law. The Attorney General can enforce the provisions of this bill and seek civil penalties of up to $50,000 per violation, plus injunctive relief and attorney's fees. A parent or legal guardian of a minor harmed by a violation can bring a civil action for damages.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/02/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Emerging Issues

HB2393 Provides protections against discrimination and antisemitism in public schools and public postsecondary educational institutions
Sponsor Rep. Ian Mackey (D)
Summary
This bill defines "antisemitism" and requires that public schools, school districts, and public institutions of higher education integrate the definition of antisemitism into codes of conduct and prohibit antisemitic conduct in the same manner that discrimination motivated by race is treated. The bill prohibits discrimination by public schools, school districts, and public institutions of higher education on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, disability, religion, or marital status against students or employees. The bill provides that classes, guidance services, counseling services, and financial assistance services be available equally. The bill requires Title VI coordinators for the State Board of Education and the Coordinating Board for Higher Education to monitor antisemitic discrimination and harassment at public schools and education institutions. The coordinators will investigate complaints and determine if an education institution allowed or failed to prohibit the discrimination and harassment and compile annual reports to be submitted to the General Assembly by July 1st of each year. This bill is similar to HB 2061 (2026) and HB 937 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2396 Modifies provisions relating to teacher retirement
Sponsor Rep. Bob Bromley (R)
Summary
Currently, a district that demonstrates a shortage may hire a retired teacher to fill a full-time position for four years without that individual losing his or her retirement benefit, with specified limitations. This bill permits the hiring of retired teachers without a critical shortage and removes limitations on the number of positions that can be filled this way. The bill does require that the district contribute to the retirement system for the retired teacher, but the individual will not contribute or earn additional benefits from the system. The bill further provides that the salary for the retired teacher may be reduced by an amount equal to the percentage of the employee retirement contribution rate. This bill is similar to HB 644 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/25/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2402 Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Sponsor Rep. Danny Busick (R)
Summary
Currently, the definition of "tangible personal property", for the purposes of property taxation, includes solar panels, racking systems, inverters, and related solar equipment, components, materials, and supplies installed in connection with solar photovoltaic energy systems that were constructed and producing solar energy prior to August 9, 2022. This subclass of tangible personal property is assessed at five percent of its true value in money. This bill removes the limitation that the property must be constructed and producing energy prior to August 9, 2022. Currently, where real property is used for more than one purpose resulting in different classifications, the county Assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money for the property devoted to each use. This bill specifies that any property classified as agricultural property that is used for the purpose of energy production activities for resale must be proportionally calculated, assessed, and reclassified as commercial property. Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $2,500 per megawatt of nameplate capacity. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property. This does not prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or certain abatement agreements, and it does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100, RSMo. Beginning January 1, 2027, land associated with a solar energy project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity in excess of five megawatts must be classified as subclass (3) real property and assessed as commercial property. This bill also provides that, for certain public utility companies that have a solar energy project, the solar energy project must be assessed using a specific methodology. This does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100. The bill also provides that for real or tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy to generate electricity, including equipment used to support the integration of a solar generation asset into an existing system, must be valued and taxed by local authorities. This does not apply to certain photovoltaic energy systems or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100. This bill provides that a county commission can choose to opt-in to the provision that limits the total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in the county to 4% of all cropland in the county or less. Acres owned by utilities or electrical corporations must not be included in the 4% county calculation. The acreage is determined by the perimeter of the actual solar panels. County commissions choosing to adopt the 4% limit option must have procedures and a severability clause in those procedures. For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks specified in the bill as measured from the nearest occupied dwelling, church, or school to the perimeter of the nearest solar panel. This setback must not apply to an official agreement between the project and the property owner. This setback does not apply to solar energy projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2025, or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100. A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project. This bill is the similar to HCS HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/26/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2762

HB2403 Provides for a transfer board to be responsible for handling appeals of decisions made by statewide activities associations
Sponsor Rep. Mark Meirath (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Rue Wells Act" and defines "activities association" as any nonprofit statewide organization that facilitates interscholastic activities and includes at least one public school district. The bill prevents activities associations from serving as their own appellate body for appeals from student athletes and creates a "Transfer Board" composed of three members appointed by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, three members appointed by the President Pro Tem of the Senate, and one member appointed by the Governor. Within 30 days of a determination by the activities association a student can appeal and the transfer board must convene within five days and rule on the appeal. The board's ruling will be final. This bill is similar to HB 1361 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2278

HB2404 Prohibits a political subdivision from adopting policies for property transferred by political subdivisions from being used for lawful education purposes by a charter school
Sponsor Rep. George Hruza (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 2404 & 2172 -- PROPERTY USED BY SCHOOLS (Hruza) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Emerging Issues This bill prohibits ordinances, resolutions, and policies that prohibit school districts from leasing, selling, or transferring property to a charter school for a lawful educational purpose. A political subdivision is similarly prohibited from imposing any deed restriction or property-use restriction that prohibits property sold or leased by the political subdivision from being used by a charter school. Additionally, when a school district offers to sell or lease an unused school building or facility that is not being used for academic, extracurricular, administrative, or athletic purposes, and that either has no school-board-approved plan for future use or has a plan that has not been carried out within two years, the contract must include a right of first refusal allowing a public entity to purchase or lease the property first. The term "public entity" includes the State of Missouri and any of its political subdivisions, such as cities, counties, boards, agencies, or authorities. The bill requires districts to provide public notice on the district's website, including the square footage, contact information, and expiration date of right of first refusal which must be 60 days from the first notice. The bill outlines conditions for the selling or leasing of unused facilities to public entities and provides public entities with six months from making a written offer to complete a purchase or lease. If a public entity plans on selling an unused facility, it must first offer the facility to the district from which it was purchased for first refusal. This bill is similar to HB 2172; SB 1273 (2026); and HB 1363 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2406 Creates new provisions for the adoption of administrative rules
Sponsor Rep. Cathy Jo Loy (R)
Summary
This bill requires any state agency filing a notice of proposed rulemaking where the adoption carries a fiscal note of $250,000 or more to file notification with the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. The Committee can hold hearings on any proposed rule or portion thereof at any time. A final order of rulemaking must not be filed with the Secretary of State until at least 30 days after such final order of rulemaking has been received by the Committee. The rule will not become effective unless the General Assembly adopts a concurrent resolution and either the Governor signs the resolution or the General Assembly overrules a veto from the Governor. Except for rules adopted pursuant to emergency rulemaking authority or rules required to conform with Federal law or for Federal funding, any proposed rule will be null and void if it does not comply with the provisions in this bill. The bill requires a state agency to include written approval by the Governor to the Secretary of State with every notice of proposed rulemaking.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2409 Authorizes the "Child Care Contribution Tax Credit Act", the "Employer-Provided Child Care Assistance Tax Credit Act", and the "Child Care Providers Tax Credit", relating to tax credits for child care
Sponsor Rep. Brenda Shields (R)
Summary
HB 2409 -- TAX CREDITS FOR CHILD CARE (Shields) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Economic Development CHILD CARE CONTRIBUTION TAX CREDIT ACT (Section 135.1310, RSMo.) This bill establishes the "Child Care Contribution Tax Credit Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, a taxpayer may claim a tax credit for verified contributions to a child care provider in an amount up to 75% of the contribution. The tax credit issued must not be less than $100 and must not exceed $200,000 per tax year. A child care provider or intermediary must apply to the Department of Economic Development using the Department's approved form. After the Department makes a determination on eligibility and enters into an agreement with the child care provider, taxpayers who make contributions to such provider may receive this tax credit. A child care provider or intermediary who receives a contribution must file a contribution verification with the Department as further explained in the bill. To be eligible for the tax credit, a contribution: (1) Must be used directly by a child care provider to promote child care for children 12 years of age or younger; (2) If made to an intermediary, must be distributed in full by the intermediary within two years of receipt to one or more child care providers; (3) Must be made to a child care provider in which the taxpayer or a person related to the taxpayer does not have a direct financial interest; and (4) Must not be made in exchange for care of a child or children in the case of an individual taxpayer that is not an employer making a contribution on behalf of its employees. The tax credits authorized by this Section are not refundable and can not be transferred, sold, or otherwise conveyed. The amount of tax credits authorized must not exceed $20 million for each calendar year. If the maximum amount of tax credits allowed in any calendar year is authorized, the maximum amount of tax credits must be increased by 15%, provided that all such increases of tax credits must be reserved for contributions made to child care providers located in a "child care desert", as defined in the bill. Tax credits allowed under this Section are considered a "domestic and social tax credit" under the provisions of the Tax Credit Accountability Act. The program sunsets six years after the effective date. EMPLOYER PROVIDED CHILD CARE ASSISTANCE TAX CREDIT ACT (Section 135.1325) This bill also establishes the "Employer Provided Child Care Assistance Tax Credit Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, a taxpayer with two or more employees may claim a tax credit in an amount equal to 30% of the qualified child care expenditures paid or incurred with respect to a child care facility. The maximum amount of any tax credit issued must not exceed $200,000 per taxpayer per tax year. For the purposes of this provision, "taxpayer" is defined as a corporation defined in Chapter 143; any charitable organization exempt from Federal income tax and whose Missouri unrelated business taxable income, if any, would be subject to the State income tax under Chapter 143; or individuals or partnerships subject to the state income tax imposed by the provisions of Chapter 143. A facility will not be treated as a child care facility with respect to a taxpayer unless enrollment in the facility is open to the dependents of the taxpayer's employees during the tax year, provided that the dependents are within the age range ordinarily cared for by, and only require a level of care ordinarily provided by, such facility. The tax credits cannot be refundable, transferable, sold, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. The amount of tax credits must not exceed $20 million for each calendar year. If the maximum amount of tax credits allowed in any calendar year is authorized, the maximum amount of tax credits will be increased by 15%, provided that all such increases of tax credits will be reserved for contributions for child care facilities located in a child care desert. Tax credits allowed under this section are considered a "domestic and social tax credit" under the provisions of the Tax Credit Accountability Act. The program sunsets six years after the effective date. CHILD CARE PROVIDERS TAX CREDIT ACT (Section 135.1350) This bill also establishes the "Child Care Providers Tax Credit Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, a child care provider with three or more employees may claim a tax credit in an amount equal to the child care provider's eligible employer withholding tax, and may also claim a tax credit in an amount up to 30% of the child care provider's capital expenditures. No tax credit for capital expenditures will be allowed if the capital expenditures are less than $1,000. The amount of any tax credit issued must not exceed $200,000 per child care provider per tax year. To claim a tax credit for capital expenditures, a child care provider must present proof acceptable to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education that the expenditures fall within the definition of "capital expenditure", as defined in the bill. The tax credits are not refundable and cannot be transferred, sold, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. The amount of tax credits authorized pursuant to this Section must not exceed $20 million for each calendar year. If the maximum amount of tax credits allowed in any calendar year is authorized, the maximum amount of tax credits will be increased by 15%, provided that all such increases of tax credits must be reserved for contributions made to child care providers located in a child care desert. Tax credits allowed under this Section are considered a "domestic and social tax credit" under the provisions of the Tax Credit Accountability Act. The program sunsets six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to the perfected version of HB 269 (2025) and SS SB 742 (2024).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
HB2415 Establishes a definition of "assessment value" for real property assessment purposes
Sponsor Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 14 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2415. This bill provides a definition for "assessment value" as it relates to real property assessment purposes. This bill provides that, for the purpose of equalizing the valuation of real property and tangible personal property among counties, the State Tax Commission must use ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass of property is valued below or above its true value in money. A class or subclass of property must be considered below or above its true value in money if the weighted mean ratio is less than 70% or greater than 100%. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that many counties don't have enough sales data to use the market value approach, so this bill modifies the way assessors are currently valuing buildings in real property assessments and has them use the replacement approach. Those in support of the bill say seniors are being taxed out of their homes, and this bill brings assessments back to reality. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Van Schoiack; Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say assessors can use cost approach, market approach, or income approach. The cost approach is effective on new buildings but becomes more subjective on older buildings due to depreciation. Others state that the problem is with depreciation, and assessors should use the cost approach and the market approach for residential property. Others testifying on the bill note that people lose their homes largely because they cannot afford their taxes. Testifying in person on the bill were Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessor's Association; George Monk; and Jon Stambaugh. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/02/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2416 Modifies provisions governing the assessment and taxation of property
Sponsor Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R)
Summary
Currently, counties and cities not within counties can choose not to set multiple levies and to allow each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, to separately trigger a roll-back as provided under the Hancock Amendment. Beginning January 1, 2027, any county and city not within a county is required to implement the provisions of certain sections of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960 (2004), which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Further, each subclass of real property and personal property in the aggregate can separately trigger a rollback as provided under the Hancock Amendment. Any county and city not within a county must also implement certain provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960 (2004) as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2417 Establishes the "Parents' Bill of Rights of 2026"
Sponsor Rep. Cathy Jo Loy (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Parents' Bill of Rights Act of 2026" and prohibits the denial of rights to parents or guardians of minor children. These rights include but are not limited to the following: (1) The right to review and make copies of curricula, books and educational materials; (2) The right to access information about the student's teacher, guest lecturers, and outside presenters and limits attendance of student at assemblies and on field trips relating to diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives without affirmative parental consent; (3) A right to financial information relating to third-party contracting; (4) A right to visit during school hours; (5) The right to access all student records; (6) The right to be heard at school board meetings or other governance hearings and that meetings regarding curricula and school safety be public; and (7) The right to be notified of situations affecting the safety of their minor child at school. The bill authorizes the prosecuting attorney of the county for the school district to bring civil action if a parent files a complaint that a right has been violated.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2420 Authorizes the establishment of a charter school in any school district
Sponsor Rep. Cathy Jo Loy (R)
Summary
Currently charter school expansion is limited to specific areas of the state. This bill removes those limitations to allow charter schools to be created in any school district in the state. Charter sponsorship is also expanded to include any school district and language restricting which charter schools received local funding is repealed.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2426 Establishes provisions relating to parental rights
Sponsor Rep. Ben Keathley (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2426 -- PARENTAL RIGHTS (Keathley) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Children and Families PARENT RIGHTS (Sections 1.390 and 1.391) This bill provides that a parent has a fundamental right to direct the upbringing, education, health care, and mental health of such parent's child free from government interference. A governmental authority shall not restrict parental rights unless the authority demonstrates that the restriction is essential to further a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling interest. This provision applies to all state and local laws, resolutions, and ordinances and to the implementation of such laws, resolutions, and ordinances. The bill outlines certain parental rights that are exclusively reserved to a parent without obstruction by or interference from this State, any political subdivision of the State, any governmental entity, or any other institution. Under the bill, parents have the right to: (1) Direct the education of the child; (2) Access and review all written and electronic educational records of the child; (3) Direct the child's upbringing; (4) Direct the child's moral or religious training; (5) Consent in writing to all physical and mental health care decisions for the child; (6) Access and review all health and medical records of the child; (7) Consent in writing before a biometric scan of the child is made, shared, or stored; (8) Consent in writing before any record of the child's blood or DNA is created, stored, or shared, unless authorized pursuant to a court order; (9) Consent in writing before any governmental authority makes a video or voice recording of the child, unless, without abrogating rights secured under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, such recording is made as part of an event or circumstance described in the bill; (10) Be notified promptly if a governmental authority suspects that abuse, neglect, or a criminal offense has been committed against the child, unless such notification is reasonably believed to be likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the child; (11) Opt the child out of any personal analysis, evaluation, survey, or data collection by a school district except what is necessary and essential for establishing a student's educational record for a student of the school district; (12) Excuse a child from school attendance for religious purposes; (13) Participate in parent-teacher organizations and other school organizations that are sanctioned by the board of education of a school district; (14) Receive, upon first contact with a representative of the Department of Social Services, an accurate written itemization containing all details of allegations of child abuse or neglect of the child, excluding only the name of the person who made the allegations; and (15) View a publicly available, easily accessible accounting of all financial transactions conducted with school district funds without being required to submit a formal request or otherwise make direct contact with the school district to access such information. Except for law enforcement personnel, a governmental authority shall not encourage or coerce a child to withhold information from the child's parent; nor shall a governmental authority withhold from a child's parent information that is relevant to the physical, emotional, or mental health of the child. A parent who believes his or her rights have been violated under this bill may assert that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding, regardless of whether the government is a party to the proceeding, and obtain appropriate relief against the government, including declaratory relief, injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and reasonable attorney's fees and costs. SPECIAL EDUCTION RECORDS (Section 161.854) This bill also requires public schools that serve students with an individualized education program (IEP) to implement parental consent procedures. Written parental consent must be obtained and maintained for initial placement, placement changes, removal of service, or the reduction or addition of service minutes by more than 25% as specified in the bill. If the parents and local educational agency (LEA) only reach an agreement on certain IEP services or interim placement, the child's new IEP will only be implemented in the areas of agreement with the current services remaining unchanged unless the local education agency follows procedures specified in the bill. The bill states that if consent is not provided within 10 school days, the LEA and the parents must include an additional addendum to a child's IEP on areas of disagreement and provide resolution for the disagreement within 20 school days with the option of an additional 20 school days with consent from both parties as long as progress or additional agreements are reached. Dispute resolution options are provided and can occur upon request of either the school district or the parent of the child. If a child is identified as eligible for special education services, the parents have the right to schedule a visit for any program or classroom proposed for their child as long as that visit does not interfere with instruction. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) must adopt a parental consent form, as specified in the bill, that each school district will provide to parents. Districts may not proceed with implementation of a student's IEP without the parental consent form completed except as provided in the bill. This provision has a delayed effective date of July 1, 2027. ONLINE PUBLIC SCHOOL FINANCIAL RECORDS (Section 162.192. The bill requires each school district to maintain an easily accessible online record of all moneys the district receives and spends. Each public school within a school district must post the district's financial ledger on the school's website, as specified in the bill. The financial ledger must be updated monthly, within 45 days of the close of the calendar month, and the website must contain at least five fiscal years of financial information. DESE may provide standardized language or icons, and provide or approve templates or platforms for a school district to use to comply with these provisions. Each school district is required to certify compliance to DESE annually and if DESE finds that a school district is in violation of these provisions they may withhold state aid to the district. The bill requires DESE to establish a process for members of the public to file a complaint. MEDICAL TREATMENT (Section 431.061) The bill additionally repeals provisions authorizing minors to consent to medical treatment or procedures involving venereal disease and drug or substance abuse.
Progress
House: Perfected
Last Action
04/30/2026
H - Third Read and Defeated - Y-70 N-60

HB2428 Changes provisions governing charter schools
Sponsor Rep. Ben Keathley (R)
Summary
This bill expands where a charter school may be operated to include any school district located within a charter county, currently this includes St. Charles, Jefferson, and St. Louis counties, and any district that includes a municipality with a population greater than 30,000. The bill also removes limitations on the use of state school aid and local aid funding to include the charter school expansions. Procedures relating to changes in a school district's accreditation status that affect charter schools are repealed under the bill. As specified in this bill, St. Louis City must not adopt, enforce, impose, or administer an ordinance, local policy, or local resolution that prohibits property sold, leased, or transferred by the city from being used for any lawful education purpose by a charter school. St. Louis City may not impose, enforce, or apply any deed restriction that expressly, or by its operation, prohibits property sold, leased, or transferred by the city from being used for any lawful educational purpose by a charter school. If St. Louis City offers property of the city for sale, lease, or rent, St. Louis must not refuse to sell, lease, or rent to a charter school solely because the charter school intends to use the property for an educational purpose. This bill is similar to HB 1044 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2438 Renames the state tax commission to the "State Assessment Commission" and modifies provisions relating to the composition and powers of the commission
Sponsor Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R)
Summary
This bill changes the name of the State Tax Commission to the "State Assessment Commission" (Commission). Currently, the Commission must be composed of three members. The bill provides that, by January 1, 2027, the Commission must be composed of seven members, and they must be appointed for term lengths specified in the bill. All commissioners must have assessment or real property appraisal experience, as defined in the bill. Currently, no more than two of the three members are allowed to be from the same political party. This bill provides that no more than four of the seven members of the commission can be of the same political party. This bill provides that any investigation, inquiry, or hearing that has been authorized can be held by a majority of the Commission. This bill modifies the process and timeline for when an assessor is required to appear before to commission for an assessment hearing.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2439 Renames the state tax commission to the "State Assessment Commission" and modifies provisions relating to the composition and powers of the commission
Sponsor Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R)
Summary
This bill changes the name of the State Tax Commission to the State Assessment Commission (the Commission). The bill provides that, by January 1, 2027, the Commission must be composed of seven members, and they must be appointed for term lengths specified in the bill. All commissioners must have assessment or real property appraisal experience or licensing, as defined in the bill. This bill provides that any investigation, inquiry, or hearing that has been authorized can be held by a majority of the commission. The bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the powers of the commission to raise certain assessed valuations for appeals before the commission must be limited. As it relates to appeals from local boards of equalization on the assessed valuation of the real or tangible personal property of individuals, the powers of the commission must be limited to upholding the decision of the local board of equalization, upholding the original assessed valuation, or lowering the assessed valuation. The Commission must not raise such assessed valuation. This bill repeals the Commission?s power to develop or enter into contracts related to computer software programs for assessment purposes. The bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the Commission must provide to each county a detailed list identifying real or tangible personal properties for each class, subclass, or portion thereof, that are found to be valued either below or above its real value in money and not in compliance with the applicable standards used for the assessment level and uniformity. This bill modifies the process and timeline for when an assessor is required to appear before the Commission for an assessment hearing.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2447 Modifies provisions governing compulsory school attendance
Sponsor Rep. Mark Boyko (D)
Summary
Currently, children between the ages of five and seven can be excused from attendance at a public school if the child's parent or guardian request that the child be dropped from the school's rolls. This bill repeals this provision.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2448 Authorizes the establishment of charter schools in school districts in Cass County
Sponsor Rep. Michael Davis (R)
Summary
This bill expands where charter schools can be established to include in a school district with the majority of such district located within a county with more than 100,000 but fewer than 120,000 inhabitants and with a county seat with more than 9,000 but fewer than 11,000 inhabitants. This currently would include school districts within Cass County.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2449 Establishes the "Missouri Parental Choice Tax Credit Act" relating to a tax credit for certain educational expenses
Sponsor Rep. Michael Davis (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Parental Choice Tax Credit Act" and provides a tax credit to parents or guardians of any "qualified student" enrolling in a "qualified school" as defined in the bill. The amount of the tax credit set forth in the bill is for eligible expenses which are outlined and include the cost of tuition and fees at qualified schools. Such tax credit must not exceed the lesser of the eligible qualified expenses or the state adequacy target for each tax year. The bill outlines specific provisions for claiming the tax credit along with eligibility restrictions. Taxpayers participating in the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Program are ineligible. Tax credits are refundable but not transferable. The bill details certain duties of the Department of Revenue to maintain the Act. This bill is similar to SB 1341 (2026); HCS HB 77 (2025); and HB 1911 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2457 Modifies provisions related to the "Donated Food" food pantry tax credit
Sponsor Rep. Pattie Mansur (D)
Summary
This bill adds food donated to a food bank, as defined in the bill, on or after January 1, 2026, to the list of donations qualifying for a donated food tax credit. Currently, any taxpayer who makes a donation to a local food bank that is eligible for a tax credit must be allowed a credit against their state income tax liability in an amount equal to 50% of the value of the donations. Beginning January 1, 2026, the credit will be allowed in an amount equal to 70% of the value of the donations. Currently, the cumulative amount of tax credits which may be allocated to all taxpayers contributing to a local food pantry, local soup kitchen, or local homeless shelter is $1.75 million. Beginning January 1, 2026, the cumulative amount of tax credits which may be allocated to all taxpayers contributing to local food pantries, local soup kitchens, and local homeless shelters in one fiscal year must not exceed $2.75 million. Beginning January 1, 2026, the cumulative amount of tax credits which may be allocated to all taxpayers contributing to food banks in one fiscal year must not exceed $1.25 million. If the tax credits claimed under one category do not total the allocated amount, the unused portion for that category must be available to the other category. If the total amount of tax credits claimed for any one category is greater than the amount available, the amount of credits redeemed must be apportioned equally to all eligible taxpayers claiming the credit. The bill also specifies that a taxpayer will not be liable for any penalty or interest if the taxpayer is denied full or partial credit because the cumulative maximum has been reached, as long as the taxpayer pays his or her balance or has made related arrangements within 60 days of the notice of denial. Currently, the tax credits provided expire December 31, 2026. This bill extends the tax credits to December 31, 2032. This bill is the same as HB 2461 (2026); HB 324 (2025); and HB 1730 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Ways and Means

HB2461 Modifies provisions related to the "Donated Food" food pantry tax credit
Sponsor Rep. Phil Amato (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 6 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2461, 2457 & 1782. This bill adds food donated to a food bank, as defined in the bill, on or after January 1, 2026, to the list of donations qualifying for a donated food tax credit, unless the food is donated after the food's expiration date. Currently, the cumulative amount of tax credits which may be allocated to all taxpayers contributing to a local food pantry, local soup kitchen, or local homeless shelter is $1.75 million. Beginning January 1, 2026, the cumulative amount of tax credits which may be allocated to all taxpayers contributing to local food pantries, local soup kitchens, and local homeless shelters in one fiscal year must not exceed $2.75 million. Beginning January 1, 2026, the cumulative amount of tax credits which may be allocated to all taxpayers contributing to food banks in one fiscal year must not exceed $1.25 million. If the tax credits claimed under one category do not total the allocated amount, the unused portion for that category must be available to the other category. If the total amount of tax credits claimed for any one category is greater than the amount available, the amount of credits redeemed will be apportioned equally to all eligible taxpayers claiming the credit. The bill also specifies that a taxpayer will not be liable for any penalty or interest if the taxpayer is denied full or partial credit because the cumulative maximum has been reached, as long as the taxpayer pays his or her balance or has made related arrangements within 60 days of the notice of denial. Currently, the tax credits provided expire December 31, 2026. This bill extends the tax credits to December 31, 2032. This bill is similar to HB 2457 (2026); HB 324 (2025); and HB 1730 (2024). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the tax credit for food pantries was set to expire at the end of 2026, and this bill extends that sunset. Those in support of the bill state that food banks and food pantries are vital resources for organizations that address hunger in Missouri, and the bill incentivizes more donations to these pantries and food banks. Supporters state that this bill raises the credit cap, which will make room for more donations to food banks. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Amato; Ryan Deboef, Crosslines Community Outreach; Victory Mission; Kanbe's Markets; Jessica Petrie, Feeding Missouri; Community Services League; and Leigh Anne Haun, Feeding Missouri. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that people should give from the goodness of their hearts and not for a refund or a credit. Opponents further state that Missouri is currently facing a financial crisis and adding more tax credits will hurt the State. Testifying in person against the bill was Arnie Dienoff. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/28/2026
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2467 Authorizes counties to adopt a real property tax exemption for taxpayers sixty-two years of age and older who own a homestead
Sponsor Rep. Mike Jones (R)
Summary
This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, a county can grant an annual real property tax exemption to eligible owners who are 62 years of age or older and who own a homestead. This real property tax exemption must not affect the process of setting the real property tax rate, and it must not be transferred or assigned. If an eligible owner receives this exemption, they will not be eligible for any other real property tax relief, certain property tax credits, or any other tax credits relating to the taxpayer?s homestead.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2474 Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts
Sponsor Rep. John Voss (R)
Summary
SCS HCS HB 2474 -- PUBLIC CONTRACTS Currently, Section 34.046, RSMo, authorizes the Commissioner of Administration to contract directly with other governmental entities for the purchase of supplies and to participate in cooperative purchasing agreements using contracts established by other governmental entities, so long as those contracts comply with the applicable laws and regulations of the establishing governmental entity. This bill modifies this section by authorizing the Commissioner of Administration to also participate in, sponsor, conduct, or administer cooperative purchasing agreements using contracts established by nonprofit entities whose membership and governing body are exclusively composed of governmental entities, provided the contracts were established in accordance with laws and regulations applicable to governmental entities. The bill further specifies that such agreements may be used for the purchase of supplies, including upkeep and maintenance of physical infrastructure, and authorizes political subdivisions to participate in such cooperative purchasing agreements. This bill adds "progressive design-build contracts", as defined in the bill, to numerous provisions of law related to design- build contracts. The bill modifies the definition for “design build project” by changing the threshold for noncivil works projects from seven million dollars to two million five hundred thousand dollars. The bill outlines the necessary elements of a request for proposal for a progressive design-build contract. Political subdivisions are required to solicit proposals in a two -stage process. Phase I is the solicitation and evaluation of the qualifications of design-builders. Phase II is the solicitation and evaluation of proposals describing the design- builder's approach to design development, preconstruction services, and construction of the project. Various criteria that the political subdivision must consider during each phase are described in the bill. Political subdivisions that use progressive design-build contracts are prohibited from requiring or awarding points for certain nonconstruction-related policy standards as a condition of eligibility. Political subdivisions are also prohibited from using evaluations, awards, certifications, standards, or policies unrelated to the direct construction, safety, durability, permitting, or operation of the project. The prohibited items are outlined in the bill. The political subdivision has the discretion to disqualify any design-builder that the political subdivision finds lacks the minimum qualifications required to perform the work. The political subdivision will use criteria described in the bill to select no more than three but no less than two qualified design-builders, who will be given a specified amount of time to assemble phase II proposals. Evaluation of phase II proposals must be qualifications-based. Price considerations are for the preconstruction phase services only. The political subdivision will rank the phase II proposals according to criteria described in the bill. Following the evaluation, the political subdivision can enter into negotiations with the highest-ranked design-builder to establish a preconstruction agreement. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the political subdivision can begin negotiations with the next highest-ranked design-builder. During the preconstruction phase, the design-builder and the political subdivision will collaborate to establish a fixed contract amount or a guaranteed maximum price. Upon acceptance of the price and contract terms, the parties can amend the contract to authorize construction. The provisions in this bill will expire on August 28, 2036.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/13/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

HB2476 Modifies provisions governing state aid provided to schools
Sponsor Rep. Ed Lewis (R)
Summary
This bill clarifies that the limit that a suspended or expelled student will count for state aid or for Missouri school improvement accountability is 180 days. The bill also removes language relating to aggregate hours lost due to inclement weather and the total minimum hours required for make-up for a district to receive state aid.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2478 Modifies provisions relating to utilities
Sponsor Rep. Ed Lewis (R)
Summary
The bill modifies provisions relating to utilities. PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SOLAR FARMS (Section 67.5350) The bill requires that prior to obtaining a certificate of public convenience or necessity from the Public Service Commission, any person constructing a solar farm must first submit an application to the county commission in each county where the solar farm is to be located. The county commission of any county must adopt an order or an ordinance requiring a permit to construct a solar farm within specified boundaries in an unincorporated area within the county. The permit must require construction of the facility to meet specific distances from certain properties as specified in the bill. The permit must also require noise levels not to exceed 45 decibels from any property line. Within 90 days of receiving an application for a permit, the county commission must hold a public meeting before the issuance of a permit. Notice must be provided at least 14 days prior to the public meeting. The applicant must provide certain information at the public meeting, as described in the bill. No later than 90 days after the public meeting, the county commission must issue a permit; issue a permit limiting the boundaries of the proposed solar farm; or deny the permit. Any applicant intending to make a material amendment to the permit once it is issued must submit a new application for the permit to the county commission. The county commission must require any applicant who is issued a permit to obtain liability insurance in an amount sufficient to cover any damages arising from the construction of the solar farm. The Public Service Commission must not issue a certificate of public convenience or necessity to any applicant who did not receive a permit from a county commission in each county where the solar farm is to be located. The county commission of any county where a solar farm is proposed to be constructed must require a decommissioning plan of the solar farm. This provision has an emergency clause. TAXATION OF SOLAR ENERGY PROJECTS (Section 137.100, 137.124, 153.030, & 153.034) Current law exempts solar energy systems not held for resale from property taxes. The bill repeals such provision and provides that solar energy systems constructed for exclusive use of a single property can be exempted from property tax at the discretion of the county assessor. Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, or tangible personal property associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $6,000 per megawatt of nameplate capacity and adjusted for inflation annually. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property. This does not prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or certain abatement agreements. This bill also provides that, for certain public utility companies that have a solar energy project, the solar energy project must be assessed using a specific methodology. The bill also provides that real or tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy to generate electricity, including equipment used to support the integration of a solar generation asset into an existing system, must be valued and taxed by local authorities. COMMISSION'S RULEMAKING AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINES ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (Section 393.172) By March 31, 2027, the Public Service Commission must promulgate rules applicable to electrical corporations requiring construction of electric transmission lines for which permission is sought from the Commission to adhere to specific standards relating to construction activities occurring partially or wholly on privately owned agricultural land. ALTERNATIVE ENERGY RESOURCES (Sections 393.1025 and 393.1030) The bill repeals the definition of "renewable energy resources" for the purpose of the Renewable Energy Standard and replaces it with a definition of "alternative energy resources", which includes nuclear energy. SOLAR PROJECTS NOT TO EXCEED MORE THAN 2% OF ALL CROPLAND (Section 393.1120) The total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in any county cannot be more than 2% of all cropland in the county. The county commission or other authorized governing body can increase the percentage of cropland by order, ordinance, regulation, or vote of the residents of the county. Any resident of the county will have standing to bring suit to enforce these provisions against a solar energy project developer. For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks, specified in the bill, as measured from the nearest occupied dwelling, church, or school to the perimeter of the nearest solar panel. The setbacks do not apply to solar projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2026. A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection for the solar energy project to connect to the electrical grid prior to beginning construction of the project. CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY (Section 523.010) The bill prohibits the use of eminent domain by electrical corporations for the construction or erection of any plant, tower, panel, or facility that: (1) Uses, captures, or converts wind or air currents to generate or manufacture electricity; or (2) Uses, captures, or converts the light or heat generated by the sun to generate or manufacture electricity. The bill specifies that the authority of any corporation to condemn property extends to the acquisition of rights needed for collection, distribution, communication and transmission lines, as well as substations, switchyards and other facilities needed to collect and deliver energy generated or manufactured by solar or wind facilities.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
HB2495 Prohibits employers from engaging in certain forms of discrimination based on gender
Sponsor Rep. Emily Weber (D)
Summary
This bill prohibits an employer from discriminating based on gender in providing compensation for the same work performed under similar working conditions. Wage disparities are not prohibited if based on bona fide factors other than gender. The bill prohibits employers from taking any adverse action against an employee who utilizes the protections of this bill and prohibits an employer from reducing wages to comply with the provisions of this bill. This bill allows recovery of actual damages and for an additional amount in compensatory damages, where the additional amount does not exceed twice the wages awarded, for any unlawful gender-based compensation practice. An employer who shows deliberate patterns of violations of the provisions of this bill may be ordered to pay punitive damages, in addition to any other compensation or injunctive relief ordered by a court. The bill further allows any employee who prevails in a civil action brought under the provisions of this bill to recover reasonable attorney's fees and court costs. Any action brought under the sections of this bill must be commenced within two years after the alleged violation occurs or the date of the reasonable discovery of such violation. This bill is similar to as HB 587 (2025) and HB 2037 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2496 Requires disclosure of sales prices in real estate sales
Sponsor Rep. Emily Weber (D)
Summary
This bill provides that a person cannot file for record or have recorded in the office of the county recorder of deeds any document conveying real estate under a contract for sale unless the document discloses the sales price of the real estate. The purchaser of any real estate for which the document is recorded without the purchase price is liable to the state for a civil penalty in an amount equal to 5% of the sales price. The Attorney General or the prosecuting attorney of the county in which the real estate is located may sue to recover the penalty. These provisions will not apply to an instrument conveying only a mineral interest in real estate. This bill is similar to HB 579 (2025) and HB 2048 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2500 Repeals provisions authorizing the establishment of charter schools in Boone County
Sponsor Rep. Kathy Steinhoff (D)
Summary
This bill repeals provisions authorizing the establishment of charter schools in any school district located within a county with more than 150,000 but fewer than 200,000 inhabitants. This provision currently applies to school districts in Boone County. This bill is similar to SB 923 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2502 Modifies provisions governing the transfer and archive of student records
Sponsor Rep. Ann Kelley (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 18 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2502. This bill clarifies that when a charter school closes, the student records for the school must be transfered to the school district in which the charter is located for archival purposes. The bill authorizes the State Board of Education to provide a method as outlined in the bill, for private, parochial, or parish schools to file transcripts and other student records with a repository if the nonpublic school closes. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that when private schools close there is often no way for former students to have access to transcripts or records. This bill will provide guidelines on where those records should be maintained. This is important for charters and should be part of the contract process. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Kelley and Missouri National Education Association; OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026
H - Voted Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2504 Modifies provisions relating to school protection officers
Sponsor Rep. Keith Elliott (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on General Laws by a vote of 11 to 0 with 2 members voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2504. Currently, school districts can designate teachers or administrators to be school protection officers. This bill adds other school personnel to the list of employees a school district can designate as a school protection officer and allows designated school personnel the authority to carry a weapon on school grounds if the individual has obtained a concealed carry endorsement or permit. The bill also allows a school district to require designated employees to provide a letter from a licensed mental health professional certifying that they are fit for duty to carry out the responsibilities of being a school protection officer. This bill is similar to HB 805 (2025); HCS HB 1440 (2024); and HB 70 (2023). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill allows schools to add other school personnel to the list of people they can designate as school protection officers, allowing such officers to concealed carry with the proper certification. The people who are currently designated as school protection officers or are able to carry will likely have a room full of students and may not be able to address an active shooter situation. These schools should be able to designate others who have more flexibility to reduce response time. Schools in the smaller districts don?t have the money to hire a school resource officer, so they would like to use their resources to allow people who already work for the school to carry and respond immediately. This is a voluntary position, and no one would be required to carry or go through the training. This bill does not change the structure of how the existing program already works and expands opportunities for those who are eligible to participate in the program. There is annual training that is required to keep a firearms certification. There are people who work in the school districts who know the buildings and the facilities better than the teachers so there is no benefit to allowing only certified teachers to carry handguns. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Elliott; Nicholas Spencer, Strategos International; Tonya Woods, Thayer R- II School District; Skyler Viebrock; and Arnie C. Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2527 Establishes a tax credit for certain newspaper printing plants
Sponsor Rep. John Voss (R)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2026, a "qualifying newspaper printing plant" as defined in the bill, will be authorized to claim a tax credit against its state income tax liability in an amount equal to 50% of the labor costs incurred by the qualifying newspaper printing plant during the tax year. This tax credit can be transferred, sold, or assigned. The total amount of tax credits must not exceed seven million dollars in any tax year. A qualifying newspaper printing plant seeking to claim this tax credit must submit an application to the Department of Revenue that must include, at a minimum, its name, address, and the total amount of qualifying labor costs incurred by the plant during the tax year. This tax credit is set to expire six years after its effective date. This bill is similar to SB 1209 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2529 Modifies certain provisions to include artificially generated visual depictions of a minor
Sponsor Rep. Anthony Ealy (D)
Summary
Currently, the criminal offense for possession or distribution of child pornography includes visual depictions in photographs, films, videos, pictures, or computer-generated images that involve: (1) The production of such visual depiction in which a minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (2) The use of digital, computer, or computer-generated images that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (3) The creation, adaptation, or modification of a visual depiction that shows an identifiable minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction", as defined in the bill, to the definition of "child pornography". Currently, the definition of "material" in relation to pornography criminal offenses includes, but is not limited to, anything printed or written, pictures, drawings, photographs, films, videotapes or videotape productions, and pictorial representations. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction" to the definition. Currently, the definition of "explicit sexual material" in relation to explicit sexual material criminal offenses includes, but is not limited to, any pictorial, three-dimensional, or visual depictions. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction" to the definition. This bill is similar to HB 2350 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2531 Establishes the "Revitalizing Missouri Downtowns and Main Streets Act"
Sponsor Rep. Chad Perkins (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Revitalizing Missouri Downtowns and Main Streets Act. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this bill authorizes a taxpayer to claim a tax credit equal to 25% of qualified conversion expenditures, as defined in the bill, or 30% of qualified conversion expenditures with respect to upper floor housing, as specified in the bill, incurred for converting nonresidential real property from office use to predominantly residential use, which may include retail or other commercial use. Authorized tax credits are not refundable but may be carried back three years or carried forward 10 years. Tax credits may also be transferred, sold, or assigned, as specified in the bill. The total amount of tax credits authorized pursuant to this bill must not exceed $50 million in any fiscal year. Fifty percent of the maximum amount must be reserved for qualified converted buildings of more than 750,000 square feet and must be allocated to the annual limit over a period of 10 years, provided that the project meets the criteria specified in the bill. Twenty-five percent of the maximum amount of tax credits available to be authorized will be authorized solely for upper floor housing projects located in a qualified Missouri main street district. If the total amount of the reserved tax credits have been authorized, projects located in a qualified Missouri main street district may receive tax credits from the remaining unreserved amount of tax credits. If the maximum amount of allowable tax credits is authorized in any given fiscal year, the maximum allowable amount must be increased by the percentage increase in inflation. A taxpayer must apply to the Department of Economic Development to receive tax credits pursuant to this bill. The application must include information specified in the bill. All taxpayers with applications receiving approval must submit, within 120 days following the award of credits, evidence of the capacity of the applicant to finance the costs and expenses for the conversion of the eligible property. All taxpayers with applications receiving approval, excluding projects of more than 750,000 square feet, must commence conversion within 12 months of the date of issuance of the letter from the Department granting the approval for tax credits. To claim an authorized tax credit, certain taxpayers with approval must apply for final approval and issuance of tax credits from the Department, which will determine the final amount of qualified conversion expenditures and whether the completed rehabilitation meets the requirements of the bill. The final application must demonstrate that the taxpayer has substantially converted a qualified converted building; satisfactory evidence of any qualified conversion expenditures for the structure, as determined by the Department; and any other information reasonably requested by the Department. The Department must determine, on an annual basis, the overall economic impact to the State from the rehabilitation of eligible property. No taxpayer will be issued tax credits for qualified conversion expenditures on a qualified converted building within 27 years of a previous issuance of tax credits pursuant to this bill on the qualified converted building. This bill sunsets on December 31, 2034.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/04/2026
H - Superseded by HB 3231

HB2533 Modifies provisions governing absences from school
Sponsor Rep. Chanel Mosley (D)
Summary
Currently, students in St. Louis City with 15 or more absences are reportable to the Children's Division within the Department of Social Services. The bill modifies this provision to include all public schools and adds an intermediate step where the parents of the child meet with the school to develop a plan to prevent unexcused absences. If the parents fail to meet or the student continues to miss school the bill requires the school to contact the Department within one week. The Children's Division will conduct a home visit and inform parents of the student's ongoing absences and of a potential cause for educational neglect if additional absences occur. The Children's Division must notify the school that the home visit has occurred within one week and any additional absences will be reported as a violation of Sections 167.031, RSMo, and subject to a Class C misdemeanor. This bill is similar to HB 1434 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2534 Requires teacher education programs to provide credit hours and licensed teachers to participate in professional development regarding social and emotional learning and in social work
Sponsor Rep. Chanel Mosley (D)
Summary
This bill requires the State Board of Education in consultation with the Missouri Advisory Board for Educator Preparation to include in teacher education programs three credit hours of social and emotional learning and three credit hours for social work in education. Starting in the 2027-28 school year, teacher in-service training in school districts will include three hours of training in social and emotional learning and social work for a total of six hours of professional development contact. Currently, substitute teacher certification requires 20 hours of training; this bill ensures that at least six of those hours include training in social emotional learning and social work in education. This bill is similar to HB 1432 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2535 Authorizes a homestead tax exemption for certain veterans, and to offset lost property tax revenue, increases the cigarette tax and subjects alternative nicotine products, vapor products, tobacco paraphernalia, and hemp-derived consumable products to an excise tax
Sponsor Rep. Don Mayhew (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 15 to 1. The following is the summary for the House Committee Substitute for HB 2535. This bill establishes the "Veterans and Gold Star Family Property Tax Relief Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill creates an annual exemption from the property taxes levied on the qualified residence of a disabled veteran, Purple Heart recipient, or Gold Star spouse. A Gold Star spouse is the surviving spouse of a veteran who is certified by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as a recipient of dependency and indemnity compensation under Federal law. The exemption is limited to amounts set forth as follows: (1) For disabled veterans who are Purple Heart recipients, the annual exemption will be $5,000 or the total amount of the property tax levied on the qualified residence, whichever is less; and (2) For disabled veterans with a disability rating of 70% or more or Gold Star spouses, the annual exemption is equal to 100% of the property tax levied on the qualified residence. The exemption carries over to the benefit of the disabled veteran's or Purple Heart recipient's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence and permanently resides therein. The exemption for the surviving spouse will remain proportional to the disabled veteran's disability rating as of the time of the veteran's passing, except that if the surviving spouse remarries, the exemption will be reduced by 50% effective beginning in the tax year in which the surviving spouse remarries. This will not apply to a Gold Star Spouse. The bill creates the "Veterans Property Tax Relief Fund" which will be used to pay for the exemption. Additionally, the Missouri Veterans' Commission can retain an amount not to exceed 1.5% to offset the costs of administration of the tax exemption. The Commission is authorized to determined the rules and procedures for payment of the exemption reimbursements. The Commission is required to submit an annual report to the Governor, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the President Pro Tem of the Senate summarizing the exemptions granted, disbursements, and the number of veterans assisted. The bill creates new taxes on alternative nicotine products, hemp products, vapor products, tobacco products other than cigarettes, and tobacco paraphernalia. The tax will be 10% of the manufacturer's or distributor's invoice price, before discounts and deals, with the money going to the Veterans' Property Tax Relief Fund. This bill also raises taxes on cigarettes to five mills per cigarette with the money going to the Veterans' Property Tax Relief Fund. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill helps honor veterans and their spouses for the sacrifices they have given. Unlike other bills, this bill provides a funding source to offset the loss in tax revenue. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Mayhew; D. Andrew Davis; Bruce F. Kahmke, Amvet; and Tony Laszacs. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that cigarettes are already heavily taxed. Missouri currently has a competitive advantage over our neighboring states on the price of tobacco products. This bill would take away that advantage and hurt our gas stations, convenience stores, and truck stops. Testifying in person against the bill were Arnie Dienoff; Missouri Vape And Alternative Products Association; MO Hemp Trade Association; and Missouri Petroleum and Convenience Association. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say Missouri would use the funding source from hemp products if they are banned on the Federal level. Residents in neighboring states spend ten to fifteen million dollars a year on cartons of cigarettes purchased in Missouri. Testifying in person on the bill was Zachary Wyatt, Dept of Revenue. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/08/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

HB2536 Establishes definitions and provisions for the protection of women
Sponsor Rep. Becky Laubinger (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2536 -- WOMEN'S PROTECTION (Laubinger) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Emerging Issues This bill adds definitions for "female", "male", and "sex" to a Section of existing statutory definitions. Additionally, the bill provides that a "covered entity", defined to include correctional centers, juvenile detention facilities, public buildings, public elementary and high schools, and state institutions of higher education, is required to designate each multi-occupancy restroom, changing room, and sleeping quarters for the exclusive use of males or females. Every restroom, changing room, or sleeping quarters within a covered entity that is designated for females or males must only be used by members of that sex, with certain exceptions, specified in the bill. The provisions of this bill will not apply to an individual who enters a restroom or changing room designated for the opposite sex in the following circumstances: (1) To perform custodial, maintenance, or licensed inspection duties; (2) To render medical assistance; (3) To render assistance by law enforcement; (4) To provide aid in a natural disaster, emergency, or to prevent serious threat to order and safety; (5) To provide coaching or athletic training during athletic events, if no other space is available for the team; or (6) To perform the official duties of a public safety officer. During any activity or event authorized by a school or state institution of higher education where students share sleeping quarters, no student is permitted to share sleeping quarters with a member of the opposite sex, unless such persons are members of the same family. Additionally, in any other facility or setting in a school or state institution of higher education where a person may be in a state of undress in the presence of others, school personnel must provide separate, private areas designated for use by persons based on their sex, and no person is permitted to enter these private areas unless he or she is a member of the designated sex. A state institution of higher education that offers housing for students must provide students the option to be housed only in a single-sex educational housing space with persons of the same sex. An individual who, while accessing a restroom or changing room designated for use by their sex, encounters a person of the opposite sex in that restroom or changing room has a private cause of action for declaratory and injunctive relief against the covered entity if the covered entity: (1) Provided the person permission to use a restroom or changing room of the opposite sex; or (2) Failed to take reasonable steps to prohibit the person of the opposite sex from using the restroom or changing room of the opposite sex. An individual who is required by the covered entity to share sleeping quarters with a person of the opposite sex has a private cause of action for declaratory and injunctive relief against the covered entity. All civil actions brought pursuant to this section must be initiated within two years after the violation occurred. Additionally, current law prohibits any student from competing in an athletic competition that is designated for the biological sex opposite to the student's biological sex as stated on the student's official birth certificate or other government record. This provision is set to expire on August 28, 2027; this bill removes that expiration.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/05/2026

HB2539 Modifies provisions governing accountability measures for elementary and secondary schools
Sponsor Rep. Jonathan Patterson (R)
Summary
This bill requires the State Board of Education (SBE) to develop an annual accountability report card for public schools. The report card will provide information about school performance and satisfy federal reporting requirements relating to students, staff, finances, and other data. The SBE may contract with a private entity or charge the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to generate the annual report. An embargoed version of the report must be provided to schools by July 15th and within 36 hours DESE will publish the report on the Department website. Before August 15th schools must publish on the school's website the report. The bill provides that the SBE will assign a rating based on a zero-one-hundred A thru F scale for each public school and district. The criteria of the ratings are specfied in the bill and included factors such as student academic achievement and growth in English, Math, and Science as assessed through the Missouri assessment program. The factors include a value-added growth metric and a "Success Ready Graduate" measure which will be calculated by DESE. The bill also requires that the rating scale increase by 5% in any year that 65% of schools achieve an A or a B. The bill establishes the "Show Me Success Program" to provide financial awards to public schools with a high student performance and high student academic growth. The program will provide a performance-based award of $100 per student if a school is in the top 5% of schools for performance or academic growth and $50 for each student in schools that are in the top 10% but not in the top 5%. Rewards will begin after the 2026-27 state- mandated annual summative assessment. The bill requires the SBE to develop an annual accountability report card for DESE Department that will consider the number of Missouri schools rated A thru F with the objective being to increase the percentage of students attending higher rated schools, Missouri student performance on national assessments, and an anonymous survey. This bill is the same as HB 2710 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2546 Creates the telemarketing no-call list to protect businesses and residents from unwanted telephone solicitation including via call spoofing
Sponsor Rep. Mitch Boggs (R)
Summary
This bill adds business subscribers to the No-Call List and specifies that a person does not have to renew his or her objection to receiving telephone solicitations. The bill also repeals the exemption from the definition of "telephone solicitation" for a person responding to a referral or a person licensed to carry out a trade, occupation, or profession who is attempting to set up certain appointments. This bill is similar to HB 564 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/18/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2658

HB2554 Modifies provisions relating to exemptions from minimum wage
Sponsor Rep. Scott Miller (R)
Summary
Currently, under Missouri?s minimum wage law, Section 290.500, RSMo, the term ?employee? is defined, but certain individuals employed by retail or service businesses that have annual gross sales of less than $500,000 are excluded in the definition. This bill modifies the definition of ?employee? by increasing the annual gross sales threshold from $500,000 to $11,100,000 for purposes of the retail or service business exemption. Beginning in calendar year 2028, the threshold amount shall be adjusted annually to reflect changes in inflation as calculated and published by the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2559 Requires the general assembly to approve proposed administrative rules
Sponsor Rep. Ben Keathley (R)
Summary
HB 2559 -- ADMINISTRATIVE RULES (Keathley) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs This bill adds a process for proposed administrative rules with a fiscal note that estimates costs to the government, individuals, or businesses exceeding $250,000. The State agency filing the notice of proposed rulemaking must file notification of the rule with the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR). Hearings may be held by JCAR on any proposed rule at any time, and a final order of rulemaking will not be filed with the Secretary of State until at least 30 days after it has been received by JCAR. Rules that require notification be sent to JCAR under this bill will not become effective unless the requirements of the bill are satisfied, including that the General Assembly passes a concurrent resolution to approve the rule, and either the Governor signs the resolution or the Governor vetoes it and the General Assembly overrides the veto. Rules not made in accordance with the provisions of this bill will be null, void, and unenforceable, except rules required to conform with Federal law or to receive Federal funding or emergency rules. The Secretary of State will publish approved rules in the Missouri Register as soon as practicable, along with the notice of the proposed rules or portions of the notice of proposed rules that were approved by the General Assembly. The bill prohibits any State agency from filing any notice of proposed rulemaking unless they receive and include written approval by the Governor.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
03/23/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Government Efficiency

HB2562 Modifies exemptions to the sunshine law
Sponsor Rep. Mike Costlow (R)
Summary
Currently, there are certain exceptions to the general duty of public officials to disclose meetings, records, and votes in accordance with state sunshine law. This bill adds to the list of exceptions any records that relate to the security or travel for elected officials that, if disclosed, would endanger the safety of the official or the general public.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/26/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Local Government

HB2565 Modifies guidelines for student participation in athletic contests organized by sex
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Myers (R)
Summary
Currently, schools can only allow students to compete in athletics competitions designated for the student's biological sex, as indicated on the student's official birth certificate. Except that female students may participate in athletics competitions designated for male students if no corresponding competition for female students is offered. This provision is set to expire on August 28th, 2027. The bill repeals the expiration date for this language. This bill is similar to HB 1663; HB 1973(2026); HB 36; HB 113; and HB 624(2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2568 Exempts the retail sale of food from state sales and use tax, subject to a three-year sunset provision
Sponsor Rep. David Tyson Smith (D)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill eliminates any state sales or use tax from being levied or imposed on any retail sale of food. The bill modifies the term "food" to include only the types of food that are included in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. The provisions of this bill sunset three years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 1587 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2573 Repeals provisions authorizing the establishment of charter schools in Boone County
Sponsor Rep. David Tyson Smith (D)
Summary
Currently charter schools are authorized to be established in Boone County. This bill removes that authority and prevents a charter school from being established in the county. This bill is similar to HB 2500 (2026) and to HB 298 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2575 Modifies provisions relating to income tax
Sponsor Rep. George Hruza (R)
Summary
Currently, the top rate of income tax may be reduced over a period of years if certain triggers are met. Beginning January 1, 2027, a flat rate of 4.7% will be imposed on all taxable income of Missouri residents, or the top rate of tax in effect January 1, 2027, whichever is less. Modifications to the flat rate apply only to tax years that begin on or after a modification takes effect. This bill removes the limit on the number of reductions that are allowed. When the personal income tax rate has been reduced to 0%, the personal income tax rate must remain at 0% and be eliminated. This bill also removes all tax deduction triggers, and removes all existing taxable income brackets. Currently, the Missouri combined taxable income on a combined return must include all of the income and deductions of the husband and wife, and Missouri taxable income of each spouse is an amount that is the same proportion of their Missouri combined taxable income as the Missouri adjusted gross income of that spouse bears to their Missouri combined adjusted gross income. Beginning January 1, 2027, there will be one column for the calculation of total Missouri combined adjusted gross income on a Missouri income tax return. Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill increases the Missouri standard deduction to the allowable federal standard deduction plus $4000. This bill also repeals the "Missouri Working Family Tax Credit Act". This bill is similar to HCS HB 798 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2580 Prohibits public school staff members from encouraging students in their social transition to being perceived as a member of the opposite biological sex
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Coleman (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits public school staff members from encouraging minor students in their "social transition", defined as engaging in certain activities with the goal of helping a student become perceived as a member of the opposite biological sex. A school staff member must notify the principal or the principal's designee within 24 hours of a minor student's request that the staff member assist with the student's social transition. The principal must notify the parents of the student within 72 hours of the initial request for assistance. No staff member of any public school shall engage in any conduct that facilitates the social transition of any minor student, including any counseling that affirms the student's self- identification as a biological sex other than the student's actual biological sex. No staff member of any public school will initiate a conversation with, or deliver any presentation or lesson to, any minor student regarding gender transition, as defined in current law. A school employee who discloses a violation of this bill by a school official is protected from any manner of retaliation as set forth in current law. If a school district discovers that a licensed educator has knowingly violated any provision of this bill, the school district must initiate proceedings seeking to terminate the employment of the staff member and to suspend or revoke the individual's teaching license, as specified in the bill. The Attorney General may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief, against a school district or school for any violation of this bill. Any parent of a minor student may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief or for damages, against the school district or public school in which the minor student is enrolled for any violation of this bill. If the parent prevails, the court must award the parent court costs and reasonable attorney's fees and any other damages or remedy which in the judgment of the court is appropriate. This bill is similar to SB 1085 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2584 Creates and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary education
Sponsor Rep. Pattie Mansur (D)
Summary
This bill requires that charter schools and private schools that participate in the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program (defined as "private schools") shall be subject to the same procurement processes, wage standards, and contractual obligations as school districts. (Sections 160.405 and 166.706, RSMo). No more than 10%, rather than 20%, of the full-time instructional staff of a charter school may be uncertified to teach in the public schools of this state. School districts are authorized to employ uncertified instructional personnel, as long as no more than 10% of a school district's full-time teaching positions are filled by uncertified personnel and certain other conditions are satisfied. Private schools shall employ only certified instructional staff, except that up to 10% of a private school's full-time teaching positions may be filled by uncertified personnel (Sections 160.420, 166.706, and 168.011). Charter schools and private schools, in addition to school districts, shall be eligible for Innovation Waivers exempting them from certain requirements relating to assessments and accreditation. All school districts and charter schools shall be held to the same reporting standards on their Annual Performance Reports (Sections 160.518, 160.522, and 166.706). The State Board of Education shall classify and accredit charter schools and private schools in the same manner that school districts are classified and accredited. All public schools, private schools, and charter schools shall be classified using the same assessment systems and accountability measures (Sections 161.092 and 166.706). The governing body of a school district, private school, or charter school shall comply with all Missouri Sunshine Law requirements for public meetings, including providing advance public notice, and shall additionally provide online public access to all meeting minutes (Sections 162.012 and 166.706). School districts, private schools, and charter schools shall display annual financial reports on their websites, including information about revenues, expenses, contributions, contracts, and personnel salary schedules (Sections 162.015 and 166.706). Any charter school that accepts transferring students under any open enrollment program enacted by the General Assembly, as well as any private school, shall set its opening date each school year no earlier than 14 calendar days prior to the first Monday in September (Sections 171.031 and 166.706). This bill is similar to SB 1384 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2588 Establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Homestead Tax Credit Act", authorizing counties to adopt a real property tax credit for certain disabled veterans who own a homestead
Sponsor Rep. Mike Jones (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 16 to 1. This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Homestead Tax Credit Act". The bill provides that for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, a county can grant an annual real property tax credit for the total amount of real property taxes levied on the residence by any county or political subdivision for disabled veterans if such county adopts an order, ordinance, or resolution authorizing such real property tax credit in such county. The disabled veteran must have a 100% permanent and total service-connected disability and the market value of the property cannot exceed $500,000. The tax credit can be used for a residence and up to five acres. If the total market value of the residence and surrounding acreage does not exceed $500,000 dollars, ownership of additional acreage will not disqualify an owner from eligibility under the provisions of this section. The real property tax credit carries over to the benefit of the eligible owner's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence, permanently resides there, and does not remarry. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this will reduce strain on fixed income families of disabled veterans. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Jones; Missouri National Guard Association; Clay Williams, American Legion Post 331/Vfw 3176/ Dav 49; Blake Leitch, Parmele Disability Advocate; Charles Canady; Charles A Sanders; ABATE for Missouri; and Andy Davis. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that there needs to be a funding source to replace the lost tax revenue the counties are receiving. Testifying in person against the bill was Arnie Dienoff. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/25/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

HB2604 Establishes transfer procedures to nonresident districts for students in public schools
Sponsor Rep. Brad Pollitt (R)
Summary
DEFINITIONS (Sections 167.1200 to 167.1230) The bill establishes the "Public School Open Enrollment Act" and defines certain terms such as "nonresident local education agency" (nonresident LEA), "resident local education agency" (resident LEA), and "transferring student", among other definitions. TRANSFER POLICY AND PARTICIPATION (Section 167.1205) The bill establishes an opt-in public school open enrollment program with the intent to improve the quality of instructional and educational programs by increase parental involvement, provide access to programs and classes, and offer opportunities to align parental curriculum options to personal beliefs. The bill specifies that any student beginning kindergarten or any transferring student, as that term is defined in the bill, can attend a public school in a nonresident LEA participating in the program. Schools must declare participation in the open enrollment program by November 1st for the following school year. Participating schools are not required to add teachers, staff, or classrooms to accommodate transfer applicants. Schools can restrict the number of outgoing transfer students to 5% of the previous school year's enrollment. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) must develop and maintain an online resource to facilitate applications and provide a searchable public database for allowable transfers. DESE or an entity skilled in policy development must develop a model open enrollment transfer policy, as outlined in the bill. All public schools must adopt the model policy, regardless of participation in the program, but each school board can modify the model policy based on the school's needs. Students who wish to attend nonresident schools that have an academic or competitive entrance process must furnish proof that they meet the admission requirements. Nonresident LEA's are able to deny transfers to students who, during the most recent school year, have been suspended two or more times or have either been suspended for an act of violence or expelled. The bill establishes a provisional transfer procedure upon approval of the nonresident LEA's superintendent and provides that a student who has been denied such a transfer has the right to meet in-person with the nonresident LEA superintendent. Students that participate in open enrollment in high school can not participate in varsity sports during the first 365 days of enrollment in a nonresident LEA, with exceptions that are outlined in the bill. APPLYING FOR TRANSFER (Section 167.1210) Any student who applies for a transfer can only accept one transfer per school year, although the student can return to his or her resident LEA and, if so, complete a full semester before applying for another transfer. Students can complete all remaining school years in their nonresident LEA and any sibling can enroll if the school has the capacity, as provided by the bill. For the purposes of determining federal and state aid the student must be counted as a resident pupil of the nonresident LEA, except for federal calculations of military impact aid. Parents will be responsible for transportation to the nonresident school or to an existing bus stop location in the nonresident LEA. PARENT PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE FUND (Sections 167.1211 and 167.1212) The bill creates the "Parent Public School Choice Fund" which is created to be used for the public school open enrollment program and to reimburse for special needs education as outlined in Section 167.1211, RSMo. NUMBER OF TRANSFER STUDENTS (Section 167.1215) The bill specifies that annually, before November 1st, each school must set and publish the number of transfer students the school is willing to receive for the following school year. Schools will also develop a policy for online waitlists and notify applicants if they have been waitlisted. APPLICATION PROCESS (Section 167.1220) The processes for a transfer application and the details for notifications of acceptance or rejection are specified within the bill. DESE must create an online resource to receive applications, which must be submitted before January 1st. DESE will conduct a lottery of applications by January 15th and provide notice to all applicants regarding the acceptance or rejection of each application. The nonresident LEA's superintendent or a designee thereof must review each application, determine if the application is rejected or accepted, and inform DESE of his or her decision. DESE must be notified of all accepted students and will notify the resident LEA and request the student or the student's parent participate in an anonymous survey related to the reasons for participating in the Open Enrollment Program. DESE will publish an annual report based on the survey results. PROCEDURE FOR CERTAIN STUDENTS HAVING BEEN ACCEPTED (Section 167.1224) The bill includes a procedure for schools when a transferring student has special education needs. Schools can also establish standards for transfer applications and post the information on the school website and in the student handbook. Schools that are served by special school districts must reach an agreement with such special school district regarding finance, staffing, and other items prior to participating in the program. ALLOWED EXEMPTIONS (Section 167.1225) This bill specifies that a school can annually declare an exemption for the upcoming school year from the requirements set forth in this bill, provided that the school is subject to a desegregation order or mandate of a Federal court or agency remedying the effects of past racial segregation or subject to a settlement agreement remedying the effects of past racial segregation. The bill requires any student who transfers from a K-eight school enroll before the end of the student's sixth grade year, or the K-eight school must pay tuition as specified under Section 167.131. Additional exemptions are specified for students who qualify for transfers under other listed Sections. APPEAL PROCEDURE (Section 167.1227) The bill outlines an appeal procedure for students whose application is rejected and includes the notification process if DESE overturns the determination of the nonresident LEA on appeal. ANNUAL REPORTING (Section 167.1229) DESE must collect and report data annually from schools on the number of applications and study the effects of the public school choice program transfers. The report must be submitted annually by December 1st to the Joint Committee on Education, the House Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education, and the Senate Committee on Education, or any successor committees thereof. DESE must annually make a random selection of 10% of the schools participating in the program and audit each selected transferred that were approved or denied under policies adopted in this bill. ALTERNATIVE FUNDING (Section 167.1230) The bill requires that enrollment of students under the program not occur before July 1, 2027. The bill outlines what steps must be taken if the Parent Public School Choice Fund does not have sufficient funding necessary to provide for eligible reimbursements for transportation and special education expenses. Transportation costs must be considered eligible expenses under Section 163.161, and special education students will be provided additional weight in the formula calculation for the nonresident school. This bill is similar to SCS HCS HB 711 (2025); HCS HB 1989 (2024); and HCS HB 253 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2607 Modifies provisions governing the assessment of property taxes
Sponsor Rep. Carolyn Caton (R)
Summary
This bill requires the physical inspection of a property required to increase the assessed valuation of a parcel of real property by more than 15% since the last assessment to be completed prior to July 1 of the reassessment year. The bill provides that, if the common level of assessment, as defined in the bill, in a subclass is lower than the individual level of assessment, as defined in the bill, of any parcel in that subclass, the individual level of assessment for the parcel must be reduced to the common level of assessment. This reduction will be made upon an appeal by the property owner. This bill requires an assessor to provide any third-party documents or reports that were relied upon in the computation of a property's assessed value to the property owner. The bill requires assessors to notify a property owner about the method and basis of computation of value for any property that gets an increase in assessed value. If a property owner prevails in an appeal because an assessor fails to provide evidence of a physical inspection, the assessor's increased assessed valuation will be void in its entirety and the previous assessed valuation will be applied. This bill allows a person who just acquired a real property during an even-numbered year to appeal the assessed value to the State Tax Commission. If the appeal is successful, the State Tax Commission has the authority to lower the property's assessed value. Currently, in charter counties and the City of St. Louis, taxpayers may be reimbursed appraisal costs, attorneys fees, and court costs incurred during an appeal to the State Tax Commission if the taxpayer is successful in the appeal. This bill requires such reimbursements. The bill also increases the maximum amount of fees to be reimbursed from $1,000 to $5,000 for residential property appeals, and from $4,000 to $5,000 for utility, industrial railroad, or other subclass three property appeals. This bill requires refunds to be issued to taxpayers within 30 days of the date of a determination that the taxpayer is entitled to one. If the Collector fails to issue the refund within 30 days, the taxpayer will be entitled to interest on the refund at a rate established by the Director of Revenue. This bill is similar to SB 786 and SB 787 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2608 Modifies provisions relating to the expenditure of public funds
Sponsor Rep. Peggy McGaugh (R)
Summary
Currently, no contribution or expenditure of public funds can be made directly by any officer, employee, or agent of any political subdivision, school district, or charter school to advocate, support, or oppose the passage or defeat of any ballot measure or candidate for public office. This bill adds special districts to the list of public entities in this prohibition. This bill is similar to HB 373 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2613 Establishes the "Missouri Free School Meals Program" to reimburse schools for providing free breakfasts and lunches to all students
Sponsor Rep. Stephanie Hein (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Free School Meals Program" to reimburse schools for providing free breakfasts and lunches to all students, regardless of whether those students are eligible for free meals under federal guidelines. The bill requires a school that participates in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) National School Lunch Program but is not eligible to have all student meals reimbursed at the free rate through the USDA Community Eligibility Provision to participate in the Missouri Free School Meals Program. Such a school must provide to all students at no cost up to two meals per school day, with a maximum of one free breakfast and one free lunch. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must reimburse a school that participates in the Missouri Free School Meals Program in an amount equal to the difference between the federal reimbursement rate for a free meal and the actual reimbursement received by the school. This bill is similar to HB 998 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2625 Modifies provisions governing state aid to school districts with an operating levy for school purposes of at least one dollar and fifty cents
Sponsor Rep. Tim Taylor (R)
Summary
Currently, a school district does not receive more state aid for its education program than it received per weighted average daily attendance for the school year 2005-06 from the foundation formula, unless it has an operating levy for school purposes of at least $2.75. This bill changes the operating levy floor to receive certain state aid to $1.50 beginning the 2026-27 school year.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026

HB2626 Renames the state tax commission to the "State Assessment Commission" and revises related statutory citations to such name
Sponsor Rep. Tim Taylor (R)
Summary
This bill changes the name of the State Tax Commission to the State Assessment Commission.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2627 Enacts provisions governing personal property taxation
Sponsor Rep. Tim Taylor (R)
Summary
Currently, local County Assessors determine the value of new construction and improvements of both real and personal property by maintaining a yearly record of increases in valuation for each political subdivision in the county that results from new construction or improvements. The aggregate increase in valuation of personal property for the current year over that of the previous year is the equivalent of the new construction and improvements factor for personal property. Beginning January 1, 2027, any increase in the aggregate valuation of personal property for the current year over that of the previous year cannot be counted as new construction. This bill allows a taxing authority to establish a proration program for payments of personal property on totaled motor vehicles. The taxing authority may award a prorated property tax credit during the tax year to reduce the total personal property tax owed on a totaled motor vehicle and claimed against the amount of personal property tax due at the end of the same tax year. The prorated property tax credit must be prorated on a monthly basis. The amount of the credit is determined by a ratio, where the numerator must be the number of full months from the date of disposition of the totaled motor vehicle continuing through the close of the tax year, and the denominator is 12. The prorated property tax credit is nonrefundable but may reduce the tax liability to zero. A taxpayer may apply for this program if: (1) The totaled vehicle was owned, registered, and titled under the taxpayer's name as of January 1 of the tax year in which the vehicle was totaled; or if owned by a business, the name of the business or authorized agent; (2) The totaled vehicle was included on the local taxing entity's tax roll, and the taxpayer was liable for personal property taxes on the totaled vehicle; (3) The taxpayer was up to date on all state and local taxes and fees owed on the totaled vehicle; and (4) The title on the totaled vehicle has been transferred to the insurance company and is no longer titled or registered to the taxpayer nor in the taxpayer's possession; if a taxpayer who participates in this program purchases a replacement vehicle during the same tax year that the taxpayer's vehicle was totaled and he or she received a prorated property tax credit, the replacement vehicle will not be included in the tax rolls for that tax year to offset the property tax liability. Taxation of the replacement vehicle must follow the normal assessment procedures. If a taxpayer repurchases a totaled vehicle through a salvage certificate of title and operates or maintains the salvaged motor vehicle, it will be taxed in accordance with the statutory assessment standards provided by general law and will not qualify for the prorated property tax credit. A taxing entity must adopt a personal property tax proration program by way of an ordinance. The ordinance must include the following: (1) Procedures and deadlines for application and participation in the program, as well as required documentation, as specified in the bill; (2) Procedures for verification and record keeping of the prorated property tax credit amount, as well as the amount of personal property tax to be modified; (3) Creation of a form for use by taxpayers; (4) Procedures for the crediting of the amount of the prorated property tax credit toward the taxpayer's personal property taxes; and (5) Any other provision the taxing entity deems reasonable and necessary to implement and carry out the program. The taxing entity may by ordinance establish rules and procedures for the program and must make the information regarding the program available to the taxpayers. A taxpayer who participates in the program will not have his or her right to protest the amount of the tax payments affected.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/24/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

HB2650 Reduces the assessment percentage of tangible personal property over a period of years
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
This bill allows a city not within a county or a county to eliminate the assessment and taxation of tangible personal property if the majority of qualified voters of such county or such city not within a county approves the elimination or the replacement of the tangible personal property tax with a city- or county-wide sales tax. If the majority of qualified voters approves the elimination of tangible personal property taxes, the taxes must be reduced or replaced beginning on January 1st of the calendar year following the adoption of the elimination or replacement. The assessment rate of tangible personal property must be reduced each year for a period of five years, as described in the bill. By the fifth calendar year following the adoption of the elimination or replacement, and for all subsequent years, tangible personal property must no longer be assessed or subject to a tangible personal property tax. The assessor must no longer make a list of all tangible personal property in that jurisdiction. This bill is similar to HB 903 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2651 Modifies provisions governing local property tax ballot questions, real property assessments, and property tax levies
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
Currently, certain counties, cities, political subdivisions, or other taxing districts can propose the imposition, continuation, modification, or elimination of a property tax to the voters at certain times of the year. This bill provides that these proposals must be submitted to the voters at the general election in November. This bill provides that new construction and improvements will no longer be excluded from the aggregate assessed valuation calculation, as it relates to the Hancock Amendment, setting real property tax levies, inflationary assessment growth, and adjusted tax rate ceilings. Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase can levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate. The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate. Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline. As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces such language with that relating to multiple tax rates. Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt-out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of HB 1150 (2002), and certain provisions of SB 960, which include setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county can also opt-out of implementing certain provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes. This bill repeals the references to the provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and SB 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt-out of or to implement such provisions. The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/10/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

HB2665 Exempts the retail sale of food from state sales and use tax
Sponsor Rep. Will Jobe (D)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill eliminates any State sales or use tax from being levied or imposed on any retail sale of food. The bill modifies the term "food" to include only the types of food that are included in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. This bill is similar to HB 432 (2025); HB 1418 (2024); and HB 591 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2666 Establishes the "Uniform Public Expression Protection Act"
Sponsor Rep. Ben Keathley (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Judiciary by a vote of 8 to 4. This bill establishes the "Uniform Public Expression Protection Act". The bill relates to causes of action filed against individuals who exercise certain constitutional rights. The bill specifies that, when a person, defined in the bill as "an individual, estate, trust, partnership, business or nonprofit entity, governmental unit, or other legal entity", has a cause of action filed against the person based upon the person's communication in a governmental proceeding or on an issue under consideration in a governmental proceeding, or when the person exercises the person's right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble, or the right of association, that person may file a special motion to dismiss the cause of action. This bill establishes procedures for such special motions to dismiss. The bill specifies under which circumstances a court may award costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, and reasonable litigation expenses. The provisions of the bill apply to civil actions filed on or after August 28, 2026. This bill is similar to HB 1092 (2025) and HB 1785 (2024). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that Anti-SLAPP legislation protects public expression. It is an attempt to counter the litigation that has a chilling effect on free speech. It creates a separate dismissal action for cases that are intended to chill a person?s exercise of freedom of speech or government petitioning through our civil justice system. It allows a person who thinks he or she should not be a party to be removed from the case. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Keathley; Missouri Press Association; Missouri Broadcasters Association; Arnie Dienoff; and Institute for Free Speech. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/15/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Judiciary

HB2668 Modifies provisions governing property taxes
Sponsor Rep. Ben Keathley (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS No. 2" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 9 to 6. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute No.2 for HB 2668. Currently, certain counties, cities, political subdivisions, or other taxing districts may propose the imposition, continuation, or modification of a property tax to the voters at certain times of the year. This bill requires such proposals to be submitted to the voters at the general election in November. (Sections 64.401, 66.265, 67.457, 67.799 - 95.390, 137.037, 137.065, 137.565, 137.1040, 162.223 - 650.408, RSMo). The bill prohibits any political subdivision or election authority from advertising or describing any proposed property tax as a ?no tax increase? tax proposal, except in certain circumstances. (Section 67.496). The bill requires any question submitted to voters by a political subdivision desiring to levy a property tax to be submitted only on general election day. This requirement does not extend to township governments. (Section 115.123) This bill requires that the election authority for a political subdivision or special district label ballot measures related to property taxation numerically or alphabetically. (Section 115.240). Beginning January 1, 2027, the bill standardizes property tax- related ballot language and requires such ballot language to include certain elements as specified in the bill. This bill requires ballot language to describe the desired tax as a specified amount per $100,000 or per $10,000 of appraised value, depending on whether the property is residential, commercial, agricultural, or a motor vehicle. The bill prohibits any political subdivision or election authority from advertising or describing any proposed property tax as a ?no tax increase? tax proposal, except in certain circumstances. The bill requires ballot language statements to be fair, true, and accurate (Section 115.706). This bill provides that each political subdivision that adopts or has adopted any tax abatement or similar economic incentive must decrease the levy of real property tax rates to reduce the amount of tax revenues such political subdivision received from the additional tax abatement revenue (Section 137.039). This bill provides that all township governments may continue to submit property tax ballots in either April or November (Section 137.481). This bill clarifies that any county authorized to impose a property tax must grant a property tax credit to all eligible taxpayers for certain increases to an eligible taxpayer?s real property tax liability. The bill further clarifies that in a county granting a real property tax credit, the county and each political subdivision levying a real property tax must apply the county?s or political subdivision?s proportional amount of the credit when calculating the eligible taxpayer?s property tax liability. The county and the political subdivision are prohibited from adopting any procedure that limits the definition or scope of eligible credit amounts or eligible taxpayers. As it relates to calculating the property tax levies, the total amount of credits authorized in the county must be considered tax revenue actually received by the political subdivision levying the tax. This bill clarifies that real property tax imposed by a county or by a political subdivision within the county includes, but is not limited to: tax levies for debt service, tax levies for operating purposes, and tax levies for capital improvements and projects (Section 137.1050). Currently, the eligible credit amount in "five percent counties" may be increased by no more than 5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is higher. The bill changes the language to provide that the eligible credit amount in "five percent counties" may be increased by no more than 5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is lower (Section 137.1055). This bill contains a severability clause. This bill is similar to HB 2780 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill addresses tax proposal language, ballot language, assessments, property tax payment mechanisms, and other issues raised by the public. Those in support of the bill state that moving the property tax elections to November will allow for greater voter turnout. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Keathley; Arnie Dienoff; Dennis Ganahl, Missouri Tax Relief Now. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say the bill will harm seniors who live in long-term care facilities, nursing homes, and assisted living facilities by increasing their taxes. Those in opposition further state the bill requires AirBnBs and VRBO properties to be assessed as residential properties even though they function as a business. The bill will cause issues once the education formula is rewritten and will cause ballot fatigue by moving all property tax elections to November. They also state that the bill does not make property taxation simpler or easier to understand. Testifying in person against the bill were Steve Hobbs, Missouri Association Of Counties; Laura, Missouri Municipal League; David Mccracken, Leading Edge Missouri; Jorgen Schlemeier, Missouri Hotel And Lodging Association; Mike Lodewegen, Missouri Council Of School Administrators; Nikki Strong, Missouri Health Care Association; Tim Blattel, Twin Oaks Estate/Mala. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/09/2026
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/10/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Rules-Legislative, HR 4

HB2671 Modifies provisions governing the assessment and taxation of property
Sponsor Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R)
Summary
Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase can levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate. The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate. Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline. As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces such language with that relating to multiple tax rates. Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt-out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county can also opt-out of implementing certain provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes. This bill repeals the references to the provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and SB 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt-out of or to implement such provisions. The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county to determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/18/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

HB2672 Establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veterans Personal Property Tax Credit Act", authorizing counties to adopt a personal property tax credit for certain disabled veterans who own up to two motor vehicles
Sponsor Rep. Mike Jones (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Personal Property Tax Credit Act". For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, a county can authorize, by adopting an order, ordinance, or resolution, a personal property tax credit for eligible veterans in an amount equal to the credit percentage applied to the qualified tax liability for each qualified vehicle, up to two vehicles. A veteran is eligible if he or she is a disabled veteran, is a resident of the county adopting an ordinance, owns and maintains a vehicle in this state, and is liable for the payment of personal property taxes on the vehicle. The vehicle must be in the name of the veteran or jointly with the veteran's spouse. The tax credit percentage will be the same percentage as the eligible veteran's disability rating, not to exceed 100%.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/25/2026
H - Superseded by HB 3078

HB2680 Requires career and technical education programs to offer courses leading to insurance licensing and certification
Sponsor Rep. Michael Johnson (D)
Summary
This bill requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to develop performance standards, course competencies, and a written model curriculum framework related to insurance licensing and certification for all career and technical education programs by the 2027-28 school year and for all career and technical education programs to adopt the model curriculum or similar curriculum by the 2028-29 school year. This bill is similar to HB 674 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2682 Renames the "Missouri Student Religious Liberties Act" the "Missouri Safeguarding Personal Expression at K-12 Schools (SPEAKS) Act" and creates provisions safeguarding students' political and ideological expression at public schools
Sponsor Rep. Darin Chappell (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2682 -- PERSONAL EXPRESSION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS (Chappell) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on General Laws This bill renames the "Missouri Student Religious Liberties Act" to the "Missouri Safeguarding Personal Expression at K-12 Schools (SPEAKS) Act". The Act adds political and ideological expression to the current protections for public school students' religious expression. The bill additionally prohibits discrimination against student clubs on the basis of their religious, political, or ideological viewpoints or any requirement that the members of the club adhere to the club's sincerely held beliefs, comply with the club's conduct standards, or further the club's mission, as such mission is defined by the club. This bill must not be construed to limit school districts' ability to restrict speech that is not protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; speech that is so offensive that a student is effectively denied equal access to educational opportunities; or conduct that intentionally, materially, and substantially disrupts school operations or the expressive activity of another individual in a campus space exclusively reserved for such activity. Any person or student organization harmed by a violation of this Act will have a private cause of action against the school, as specified in the Act. Any person or student organization aggrieved by a violation of this Act may assert such violation as a defense or counterclaim in any disciplinary action or in any civil or administrative proceeding. The State waives immunity under Federal law and consents to be sued in Federal court for claims arising under this Act. This bill is similar to SB 909 (2026).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/30/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

HB2686 Provides a sales tax exemption for certain used tangible personal property
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Knight (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Rural Issues by a vote of 10 to 0. This bill exempts from sales and use tax all sales of used tangible personal property, including any tangible personal property that is sold a second time or any number of additional subsequent times after the initial point of sale, at an auction. The provisions of this bill will not apply to motor vehicles, trailers, boats, or outboard motors purchased or acquired for use on the highways or waters of this state that are required to be titled. This bill is similar to HB 635 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say this bill ensures that items that have been sold several times at auctions after their initial sale are not taxed. Sales tax has already been paid on the items at the original time of sale. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Knight and Arnie C. Dienoff. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill would reduce revenue to local jurisdictions. There are currently more than 200 local sales tax exemptions. These revenues go to pay for voter approved services in the taxing jurisdictions. Testifying in person against the bill was Missouri Municipal League. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the wording in the bill could be reworded to clarify which items are included in the exemption. Also, these sales are hard to quantify, so the fiscal impact is unknown. Testifying in person on the bill was Zachary Wyatt, Department Of Revenue. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2689 Requires a state agency to repeal two existing rules before enacting a new one
Sponsor Rep. Darin Chappell (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits a rule proposed by a department, agency, commission, or board from taking effect unless the entity proposing the rule also repeals at least two existing rules. This bill is similar to HB 319 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2692 Modifies provisions relating to the assessed valuation of residential real property
Sponsor Rep. Darin Chappell (R)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2028, the true value in money of real property maintained and used by the owner as a primary residence for assessment purposes will be the same value determined at the most recent assessment as determined on or before December 31, 2027, subject to the following: (1) For all residential real property maintained and used as the primary residence that is bought, sold, or transferred on or after January 1, 2026, the true value in money of the property for assessment purposes must not exceed the most recent purchase price. The true value in money will be maintained until the next sale of such property; or (2) For all assessments of residential real property maintained and used as the primary residence on or after January 1, 2028, the assessed valuation may be increased, but only to the extent that the increase is the result of new construction or improvements made to the property where the added value equals a 50% increase or greater. This new assessed value will reflect the true value in money for all subsequent assessments until the conditions described above are met again or the next sale of the property. If the sale of a piece of real estate results in a transaction that is below market value, the assessor must provide evidence to the Board of Equalization or other equivalent entity that the sale price should not be used as the new true value in money for assessment purposes. The owner of the property must notify the county assessor of new construction or improvements so that a reassessment can be made. Participation in the assessment process is optional. If a homeowner wishes to participate in the assessed valuation provisions as specified in this bill, the owner may opt in by notifying the assessor's office, and the homeowner's real property must be assessed under the assessment process in existence on or before December 31, 2027. This bill is similar to HB 780 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2693 Modifies provisions relating to port authorities
Sponsor Rep. Mike Steinmeyer (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Economic Development by a vote of 12 to 2 with 1 member voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2693. Current law prohibits a city from creating a port authority if the city is located within a county that has created a port authority which has received approval as a political subdivision of this State. Under this bill, this will not be construed as invalidating any port authority created by a city and approved as a political subdivision prior to the creation of a port authority by a county (Section 68.010). If a port authority whose port district includes a constitutional charter city located in four or more counties (Kansas City) must purchase or lease real property anywhere in such counties, the real property will be deemed included within the port district (Section 68.015). Powers of port authorities are also modified as specified in the bill, including, but not limited to, the grant of powers for the establishment of port rangers licensed as peace officer, and contracting with other port authorities (Section 68.025). The bill provides that failure of a port authority to include a statement that the State is not liable on bonds of a port authority as required by law will not invalidate the bonds or render the State liable on the bonds (Section 68.040). Furthermore, the bill modifies provisions regarding the terms of port authority commissioners and their removal from office, as well as determination of commissioners' qualifications, salaries, powers, and duties if they are not determined by the political subdivision establishing the port authority. The political subdivision establishing the port authority must also provide for the filing of annual reports by the board of port authority commissioners, and for periodic independent audits of the port authority's accounts (Section 68.045). The bill modifies port authorities' contracting processes for work, equipment, and supplies and materials, and provides that port authorities may utilize additional procurement measures authorized for other political subdivisions, as described in the bill (Section 68.055). Under this bill, port authority expenditures over $75,000, rather than over $25,000, including professional services contracts, must be competitively procured. The bill requires at least 20 days? notice of the letting of the contract, with publication as described in the bill. Port authorities will have the authority to reject any and all bids and readvertise the work or proposed purchase (Section 68.057). The bill provides that political subdivisions with existing port authorities cannot form regional port authorities themselves, but that the boards of existing port authorities can apply to the Highways and Transportation Commission for approval of a regional port authority, as detailed in the bill (Section 68.060). The bill amends the definition of "new job" to include an exception for jobs created prior to the date of notice of intent, any job determined by the Department of Economic Development to be eligible for, and approved for, retention of withholding tax under the Missouri works program, provided that the period of benefits under this Section immediately follows the end of the period of benefits under the Missouri works program (Section 68.075). Under the bill, certain records submitted to a port authority may be deemed closed records, and disclosure to a port authority shall not affect records' status as closed (Section 68.085). The bill modifies the threshold for consent to the creation of a port improvement district, from 60% per capita to 50% per capita, of the owners of all real property within the boundaries of the proposed port improvement district (Section 68.205). The bill provides that a petition to the circuit court shall not be required for creation of a port improvement district within port district boundaries or for substantial changes, as defined by law, to a port improvement district in certain circumstances (Section 68.253). This bill is similar to SB 1146 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will allow Missouri to increase public safety around ports by giving ports the ability to hire employees that will be given arresting powers. This bill is meant to provide guardrails regarding ports, not preempt local ordinances or laws. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Steinmeyer; Missouri Port Authority Association; and Port KC. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/23/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2697 Changes the definition of "qualified student" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program
Sponsor Rep. Michael Davis (R)
Summary
This bill modifies the definition of a "qualified student" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship program. Currently, an elementary or secondary school student who is a resident of the State can qualify for the program if he or she is a member of a household whose total annual income does not exceed an amount equal to 300% of the income standard used to qualify for free and reduced price lunches and he or she: attended a public school for one semester during the previous 12 months, is eligible to begin kindergarten or 1st grade, or is a sibling of a scholarship recipient. This bill allows any elementary or secondary school student who is a resident of the State and not an illegal alien to qualify without the additional requirements described above.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2704 Establishes procedures for school districts to test for gifted students
Sponsor Rep. George Hruza (R)
Summary
This bill requires school districts, beginning in the 2026-27 school year, to provide universal screenings for all students at least once before 3rd grade for the purpose of identifying gifted students. The bill outlines the screening requirements, which include using valid, reliable, and current testing methods, providing a body of evidence from a minimum of two areas outlined in the bill, and being reviewed by staff members trained in testing or gifted education. A child not meeting the criteria on a single screening does not prevent the child from being identified as gifted. The bill requires districts to establish a process for the universal screenings and for annual notification to parents. This bill is similar to HB 1757 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2705 Modifies provisions governing contributions to qualified tuition programs
Sponsor Rep. George Hruza (R)
Summary
Currently, contributions to any Section 529 qualified tuition program is exempt from state tax. Under this bill, annual contributions made only to the Missouri Higher Education Deposit Program under Section 166.500, RSMo, or the Missouri Education Program established under Sections 166.400 to 166.455, or both, can be subtracted for determining the Missouri adjusted gross income, up to $8,000 per taxpayer, and up to $16,000 for married individuals filing a joint tax return. This bill is similar to HB 2116 (2026) and HB 1272 (2025).
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Read Second Time

HB2709 Modifies provisions governing the taxation of property
Sponsor Rep. Rodger Reedy (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 14 to 5. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2709 & 2671. This bill requires any ballot seeking approval to add or change a tax of real property to express the effect of the change in the ballot in terms of real dollars owed per $100,000 of a property?s market valuation. (Section 137.067, RSMo) Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase may levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate. The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception, and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate. Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property, in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. Finally, personal property tax rates are not allowed to increase above the personal property levy of the previous year, even as a part of this revenue-balancing adjustment. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline. Currently, the term "improvements" applies to both real and personal property. Additionally, the aggregate increase in valuation of personal property for the current year compared to the previous year must be equivalent to the new construction and improvements factor for personal property. The bill provides that the term "improvements" applies only to real property and repeals the provision setting the aggregate increase in valuation of personal property equal to the new construction and improvements factor for personal property. This bill requires all voter-approved tax levy increases applied to any real and personal property to be applied to each subclass of property equally. The bill provides that, if voters approve a subsequent levy increase prior to the expiration of a temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling must remain in effect until the temporary levy expires. At that time, the tax rate ceiling must be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase. If voters of a political subdivision are asked to approve an additional permanent tax rate ceiling increase prior to the expiration of a temporary levy increase, voters must be provided ballot language that indicates that the temporary levy must be made permanent if the permanent levy increase is approved. A reduction or an increase to the tax rate ceiling in a nonreassement year must be applied in the following year of general reassessment. This bill provides that, when voters pass an increase of a tax rate, the political subdivision must use the current tax rate ceiling and the approved increase to establish the rates of the levy for the tax year immediately following the election. If the assessed valuation of real property is reduced in the tax year following the election, the political subdivision can raise its levy rates so that the revenue received from its local real property equals the amount the political subdivision would have received from the increased rates of levy if there had been no reduction in the valuation. Using the increased tax rate ceiling must be revenue neutral. (Section 137.073, RSMo) As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces the language with that relating to multiple tax rates. (Section 137.079, RSMo) Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county may also opt out of implementing certain provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of SB 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes. The bill repeals the references to the provisions of HB 1150 (2002) and SB 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt out of such provisions. (Section 137.115, RSMo) As it relates to borrowed money and issued bonds by school boards of certain districts, notice of the submission of the question of any loan for a ballot must include the amount of the loan required and the purpose of the loan. (Section 164.121, RSMo) The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill requires separate levies for the three subclasses of real property and for personal property, and this will allow each levy to rollback on its own. Supporters say this bill will make ballot language clearer and that taxation by subclass allows for a more effective use of the Hancock Amendment and will allow homeowners to see the benefit of their taxes. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Reedy; Missouri Association Of Counties; State Tax Commission; and Kenny Mohr, Missouri State Assessors Association. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the state depends on local governments to help fund education, and they voice wariness toward bills that limit local revenues. Testifying in person on the bill was Mike Lodewegen, Missouri Council Of School Administrators. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/05/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2710 Modifies provisions governing accountability measures for elementary and secondary schools
Sponsor Rep. Dane Diehl (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2710 -- ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES FOR ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS (Diehl) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education This bill requires the State Board of Education (SBE) to develop an annual accountability report card for public schools. The report card will provide information about school performance and satisfy federal reporting requirements relating to students, staff, finances, and other data. The SBE may contract with a private entity or charge the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to generate the annual report. An embargoed version of the report must be provided to schools by September 15th and the SBE will provide an appeals process for information before schools are required to publish the report along with the underlying indicators and attendance rate on the school website by October 31st. The bill provides that the SBE will assign a rating based on a zero-one-hundred A thru F scale for each public school and district. The criteria of the ratings are specified in the bill and included factors such as student academic achievement and growth-relative-to-grade level in english, math, and science as assessed through the Missouri assessment program. The factors include a value-added growth metric and a "Success Ready Graduate" measure which will be calculated by DESE. Schools that do not test at least 95% of students will have a separately identified participation rate clearly identified. The bill establishes the "Show Me Success Program" to provide financial awards to public schools with high student academic growth, sustained improvement over time, or success in closing achievement gaps. The criteria for the performance based funding are outlined in bill and such funding shall be used to promote teacher recruitment and retention. The bill requires the SBE to develop a statewide report card that will report the number of Missouri schools rated A thru F with the objective being to increase the percentage of students attending higher rated schools, Missouri student performance on national assessments, and an anonymous survey. The requirement for the annual accountability report card will not be required for special school district or state-operated schools in which all students enrolled are students with disabilities. In addition to the performance rating, a school climate rating will be developed and reported on a zero-to-one-hundred scale with distinct ratings and each factor contributing an equal 25% weight to the overall school climate rating. Factors that will comprise the rating include, but are not limited to, suspension, seclusion, and restraint incidents, and surveys of parents, teachers, and students. Specifics for the composition of the web-based surveys are outlined in the bill and will measure school safety, engagement, communication, and overall learning environment. This bill is similar to HB 2539 (2026).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2711 Modifies provisions relating to the assessment of certain broadband communications equipment
Sponsor Rep. Dane Diehl (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2711 -- THE ASSESSMENT OF CERTAIN BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT (Diehl) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Utilities This bill adds machinery and equipment used to provide wired or wireless broadband communications service to the definition of "tangible personal property" for the purposes of property taxation. The bill also creates a new subclass of tangible personal property that includes new machinery and equipment used to provide fiber and broadband communications service that is placed in service after August 28, 2026. Such property will be assessed at 12% of its true value in money for calendar years 2027 through 2033 and 33 1/3% beginning in 2034. This bill is similar to SB 1202 (2026).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2713 Modifies provisions relating to tax credits
Sponsor Rep. Dane Diehl (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Agriculture by a vote of 17 to 4. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2713. This bill extends the sunset or expiration from 2028 to 2033 for the: (1) Wood Energy Tax Credit; (2) Meat Processing Facilities Investment Tax Credit; (3) Higher Ethanol Fuel Tax Credit; (4) Biodiesel Retail Sale Tax Credit; (5) Biodiesel Production Tax Credit; (6) Urban Farms Tax Credit; (7) Rolling Stock Tax Credit; (8) Agricultural Production Tax Credit; and (9) Specialty Agricultural Crops Act. The bill provides that, as it relates to biodiesel retail sale tax credit, a taxpayer must not be liable for penalties or interest on an income tax balance due if such taxpayer is denied part or all of the tax credit to which the taxpayer has qualified due to lack of available funds, and such denial causes a balance- due notice to be generated by the Department of Revenue or any other redeeming agency. Such taxpayer must pay the balance due within 60 days or be subject to penalties and interest pursuant to current law. This bill establishes the Railroad Infrastructure Tax Credit. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this bill authorizes a tax credit in the amount of 50% of an eligible taxpayer's qualified railroad expenditures and qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures. A tax credit for qualified railroad expenditures must not exceed $5,000 multiplied by the number of miles of railroad track owned or leased in the state by a railroad, and the total amount of tax credits for qualified railroad expenditures authorized in a calendar year must not exceed $4.5 million. A tax credit for qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures must not exceed $1 million for each new rail-served customer project, and the total amount of tax credits for qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures authorized in a calendar year must not exceed $5 million. An eligible taxpayer must submit a certificate of eligibility to the Department of Economic Development after the completion of the qualified railroad expenditures or qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures. Tax credits authorized in these provisions must not be refundable, but can be carried forward for up to five subsequent tax years. Tax credits can be transferred as described in the bill. This tax credit sunsets on December 31, 2033. This bill is similar to SB 913 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the tax credits affected by this bill have helped spur growth in agricultural products throughout the State and support job creation and retention in the industry. By removing the sunsets on the tax credits, the bill will provide those in the agriculture industry with certainty that when they invest in certain programs the tax incentives will still be in place. In addition the Railroad Infrastructure Tax Credit will help shortline railroad companies revive and maintain track throughout the state. These rail lines help move agricultural products across the state. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Diehl; Associated Industries of Missouri; Poet Biofuels; Missouri Farm Bureau; Missouri Corn Growers Association; Missouri Cattle Association; Mo Forest Products Association; Railway Supply Institute; Missouri Soybean Association; Biodiesel Coalition Of Missouri; Alfred Brandt, Missouri Dairy; Tony Benz, Missouri Agribusiness Association; Missouri Pork Association; Missouri Bankers Association; Jeff Van Schinick, Jaguar Transport; Missouri Economic Development Council; and Missouri Railroad Association. OPPONENTS: These was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/05/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB2716 Authorizes a tax credit for certain railroad expenses
Sponsor Rep. Dane Diehl (R)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, eligible taxpayers can claim a nonrefundable tax credit of an amount equal to 50% for qualified railroad track expenditures, or for new qualified rail infrastructure expenditures. The tax credits must not exceed the following limits: (1) Railroad track expenditures: not to exceed an amount equal to the product of $5,000 multiplied by the number of miles of railroad track owned or leased by the state; or (2) New rail infrastructure expenditures: not to exceed $1 million for each new rail-served customer project of an eligible taxpayer. An eligible taxpayer seeking this tax credit must submit a certificate of eligibility to the Department of Economic Development describing all qualified expenditures. If the Department determines that the expenditures do qualify for the tax credit, the Department can issue the certificate to the taxpayer. The cumulative amount of tax credits for qualified railroad track expenditures will not exceed $4.5 million per year. If the amount exceeds $4.5 million, the tax credits will be distributed in the order in which they are claimed. The cumulative amount of tax credits for qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures must not exceed $10 million per tax year. If the amount exceeds $10 million, the tax credits will be distributed in the order in which they are claimed. Any unused portion of the tax credit can be carried forward up to five subsequent tax years. An eligible taxpayer who earns a tax credit can transfer all or a portion of the unused credit by written agreement to any other eligible taxpayer during the year in which the credit is earned and the five years following such qualified expenditures. The Department of Economic Development must submit an annual report to the General Assembly outlining the qualified railroad expenditures and qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures for each eligible taxpayer, along with a summary of the investments made by the eligible taxpayer. The bill provides that this tax credit must be considered a redevelopment tax credit. This bill sunsets on December 31st, 2032, six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HCS HB 669 (2025); HB 1824 (2024); and HCS HB 657 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/03/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Agriculture

HB2720 Modifies provisions relating to the age for school entry
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Douglas (D)
Summary
Currently, the minimum required attendance age for students is seven years of age. This bill lowers the age from seven to five years of age for public, private, parochial, and parish schools while leaving the age of seven the same for home and family paced education (FPE) school children. This bill is similar to HB 1015 (2025) and HB 2125 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/18/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2723 Creates and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary education
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Douglas (D)
Summary
Under this bill, charter schools and private schools that participate in the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program (defined as "private schools") are subject to the same procurement processes, wage standards, and contractual obligations as school districts (Sections 160.405 and 166.706). No more than 10%, rather than 20%, of the full-time instructional staff of a charter school may be uncertified to teach in the public schools of this state. School districts are authorized to employ uncertified instructional personnel, as long as no more than 10% of a school district's full-time teaching positions are filled by uncertified personnel and certain other conditions are satisfied. Private schools shall employ only certified instructional staff, except that up to 10% of a private school's full-time teaching positions may be filled by uncertified personnel (Sections 160.420, 166.706, and 168.011). Charter schools and private schools, in addition to school districts, will be eligible for Innovation Waivers exempting them from certain requirements relating to assessments and accreditation. All school districts and charter schools will be held to the same reporting standards on their Annual Performance Reports (Sections 160.518, 160.522, and 166.706). The State Board of Education shall classify and accredit charter schools and private schools in the same manner that school districts are classified and accredited. All public schools, private schools, and charter schools will be classified using the same assessment systems and accountability measures (Sections 161.092 and 166.706). The governing body of a school district, private school, or charter school must comply with all Missouri Sunshine Law requirements for public meetings, including providing advance public notice, and providing online public access to all meeting minutes (Sections 162.012 and 166.706). School districts, private schools, and charter schools are required to display annual financial reports on their websites, including information about revenues, expenses, contributions, contracts, and personnel salary schedules. (Sections 162.015 and 166.706) Any charter school that accepts transferring students under any open enrollment program enacted by the General Assembly, as well as any private school, is required to set its opening date each school year no earlier than 14 calendar days prior to the first Monday in September (Sections 171.031 and 166.706). This bill is similar to SB 1384 (2026).
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Read Second Time

HB2733 Creates provisions relating to regulation of online content involving minors
Sponsor Rep. Eric Woods (D)
Summary
The bill defines "content creator" as an individual who creates an image, audio content, or video content in exchange for compensation. A content creator includes, but is not limited to: vloggers, podcasters, social media influencers, or streamers. Under the bill, "restricted material" is defined as any material that is obscene, or depicts explicit sexual material, nudity, and sexually explicit conduct, as such terms are defined under Missouri statutes. The definition of "social media platform" is an internet-based service or application that has account holders in Missouri and meets the criteria detailed in the bill. A minor is engaged in the work of content creation when the following criteria are met at any time during the previous twelve-month period: (1) At least 30% of the content creator?s compensated image, audio content, or video content produced within a 30-day period includes the likeness, name or photograph of the minor; (2) The number of views received per image, audio segment, or video content segment on any social media platform meets the social media platform's threshold to generate compensation or the content creator received actual compensation per image, audio segment, or video segment equal to or greater than 10 cents per view; and (3) The content creator received actual compensation for image, audio segment, or video content of at least $25,000 during the prior 12-month period A minor who is over the age of 13 can produce, create, and publish his or her own content and will be entitled to all compensation from the content. Any content creator whose content features a minor engaged in content creation must maintain certain records, as provided in the bill, and retain the records until the minor reaches the age of 21. The content creator must provide notice to the minor of the existence of the records which are to be readily available to the minor. A minor who is engaged in the work of content creation will be compensated by the content creator. The content creator will set aside gross earnings, as specified in the bill, on any content including, but not limited to, the likeness or name of the minor in a trust account to be preserved for the benefit of the minor upon the minor reaching 18 years of age. After August 28, 2026, any individual who was featured in a content creator's post on a social media platform as a minor, can request that the content creator delete or edit the post to remove any content involving the minor. The content creator must delete or edit the post if the information provided by the individual is uniquely identifiable information. Social media platforms will provide an easily accessible mechanism through which the individual can submit a request for the removal of the content featuring the minor. Social media platforms will notify the content creator within a reasonable time period, but no longer than 30 days, after receiving a removal request. The content creator will delete or edit the post from the social media platform within 72 hours after receiving a notice of removal request from the social media platform. If the content creator fails to delete or edit the post involving the minor within 30 days after receiving the notice of removal request, the social media platform must take all reasonable steps to remove or edit the content involving the minor, subject to certain exceptions, as provided in the bill. Under the bill, it is unlawful to financially benefit from intentionally or knowingly producing or distributing on social media any restricted material, involving a minor, subject to certain exceptions provided in the bill. A social media platform will develop and implement a strategy to help mitigate risks related to monetization of restricted material involving minors. Requirements of the strategy are specified in the bill. Any individual can report violations of the bill to the Attorney General. If the Attorney General finds that provisions of the bill have been violated, the Attorney General is authorized to bring a civil action. Nothing in the bill precludes an individual from bringing a private civil action for any violations of the bill. This bill similar to HB 1818 (2026) and similar to HB 1245 (2025) and SB 756 (2025).
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Read Second Time

HB2739 Prohibits public school districts and charter schools from membership in or payment of dues to certain statewide activities associations
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Knight (R)
Summary
This bill prevents public schools in Missouri from being a member of or providing dues to any statewide activities association that allows post-season or tournament-style athletic competition between public and private schools. This bill is the same as HB 2327 (2024) and HB 1273 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2742 Relating to the careless operation of a motor vehicle
Sponsor Rep. Mike Jones (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2742 -- THE CARELESS OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE (Jones (12)) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Transportation FAILURE TO STOP FOR A SCHOOL BUS (Sections 160.3300, 302.302 & 304.070) Currently, a person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if they pass a stopped school bus in the process of loading or unloading students; the person is guilty of a class E felony if the offense results in the injury of any child; and a class D felony if the offense results in the death of any child. The court can order the suspension of a person's license for 90 days after a first offense and 120 days after a second or subsequent offense. These suspensions are in addition to other suspensions for other violations of law. This bill differentiates between "physical injury" and "serious physical injury", as defined in the bill. An offense resulting in the physical injury of any child is a class E felony. An offense resulting in the serious physical injury of any child is a class D felony. This bill adds fines for each offense and changes the provisions regarding suspended licenses as follow: (1) For a first offense, a person is subject to a fine of at least $500, but no more than $1,000, and the court can suspend their license at its discretion; (2) For a second offense within five years, a person is subject to a fine of at least $1,000, but no more than $2,000, and their license will be suspended for 90 days; and (3) For a third or subsequent offense within five years, a person is subject to a fine of at least $1,500, but no more than $3,000, and their license will be suspended for 180 days. No court can suspend any portion of these fines, and no offense can be disposed of through the State fine collection center or payment of a fine without an appearance in open court. The defendant must appear in court in person or by attorney for deposition. Each instance of failing to stop for a school bus that is loading or unloading students will also result in five points being assessed to the driver's license. The bill authorizes school districts to install and operate school bus safety cameras with the approval of the school district's board of directors. Any image or video recorded by the camera that is not used to enforce violations for passing a stopped school bus must be permanently deleted no later than 180 days after the date of capture. No image or video recorded by such cameras can be used as part of an automated camera system designed to detect traffic violations and issue citations; however, prosecutors can introduce images and video captured by a school bus safety camera as evidence in court. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS DEVICES (Section 304.822) Currently, the State preempts the field of regulating the use of electronic communication devices by the operators of motor vehicles. This bill changes the language of the preemption so that local laws, ordinances, or regulations are allowed as long as they do not conflict with State law on the subject. HOSPITAL ZONES (Sections 302.302, 304.1020 & 304.1023) This bill authorizes counties and municipalities to establish hospital zones for streets surrounding a hospital as areas where hospital activities are occurring. If a county or municipality determines the boundaries for a hospital speed zone and erects signs reading "Hospital Zone - Fines Doubled", the court may double the amount of a fine for a traffic violation in the hospital zone. The maximum speed limit in a hospital zone is 30 miles per hour. The bill creates the offenses of "endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital zone" and "aggravated endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital zone. A person commits endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital zone if the person commits one of the following in a hospital speed zone, except in cases of mechanical failure or negligence by a pedestrian: (1) Exceeding the posted speed limit by 15 miles per hour or more; (2) Leaving the scene of an accident; (3) Careless and imprudent driving; (4) Operating without a valid license; (5) Operating with a suspended or revoked license (6) Driving while intoxicated; or (7) Any felony involving the use of a motor vehicle. A person who commits endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital speed zone will have four points assessed to their license and be subject to a fine of up to $500. Aggravated endangerment of a pedestrian in a hospital speed zone occurs when a pedestrian is injured or killed, and a person committing this offense will have 12 points assessed to their driver's license, and their license will be revoked. If a pedestrian is injured, the person will be subject to a fine of not more than $5,000. If a pedestrian is killed, the person will be subject to a fine of not more than $10,000. The bill requires the Department of Revenue to revoke the license of any driver who negligently strikes a pedestrian in a hospital speed zone where proper signage has been posted. The Department will make its determination based on the report of a law enforcement officer investigating the incident, and that determination will be final, unless a hearing is requested and held on the matter. A driver can petition for a hearing before a circuit division or associate division of the court in which the hospital zone accident occurred. In the petition, a driver can request a court stay the revocation of their license until the petition can be heard, and the court can grant the stay at its discretion, pending a hearing. If the court grants the stay, it will enter the order on a form prescribed by the Director of Revenue and send a copy to the Director. The Director will keep the driver's license of the driver, and the driver will have the ability to drive, using the order from the court staying the suspension as their proof of privilege to operate a motor vehicle. At the hearing, the prosecuting attorney of the county will appear on behalf of the Department, and the court will determine only: (1) Whether the person was involved in a physical accident where his or her vehicle struck a pedestrian within a designated hospital zone; (2) Whether guidelines involving notice and signage were properly implemented in such hospital zone; and (3) Whether the investigating officer had probable cause to believe the person's negligent acts or omissions contributed to his or her vehicle striking a pedestrian. If the court determines any of the answers to these three determinations is in the negative, the court must order the Director to reinstate the license or permit to drive. Otherwise, and if the driver does not request or is not granted a hearing, the driver's license or permit will be reinstated upon taking and passing the written and driving portions of the driver's license examination. This administrative adjudication to reinstate a license revoked by this bill, any evidence provided to the Department, the court's determinations, and the evidence provided to the court relating to such determinations will all be unavailable by subpoena or any other means and made available in other administrative actions, civil cases, or criminal prosecutions.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2744 Requires instruction on human growth and development in schools
Sponsor Rep. Bob Titus (R)
Summary
This bill modifies the course materials and instruction relating to human sexuality to include, beginning in the 2026-27 school year, a human growth and development discussion. The bill requires districts and charter schools to require such instruction beginning in grade three and outlines requirements including requiring video of fetal development showing the process of fertilization and every stage of human development. The bill specifies that the Attorney General has standing as parens patriae to enforce the requirements and provides a cause of action for damages and relief.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2746 Requires the department of revenue to implement a property tax mapping feature and place all tax maps prominently on the department home page
Sponsor Rep. Cecelie Williams (R)
Summary
Currently, the Department of Revenue (DOR) provides a mapping feature on its website that displays sales and use tax information of all political subdivisions in Missouri. Beginning July 1, 2027, DOR must prominently display links on the homepage of its website which direct the public to color-coded, interactive maps featuring data about sales and use taxes and to color-coded, interactive maps featuring data about property taxes in all political subdivisions in the State that have taxing authority. All political subdivisions will provide DOR with data relating to property taxes by January 1, 2027. The DOR must also use the most recent publication of the Missouri State Auditor's report on property tax rates to update and maintain the property tax levy data each year. This bill is similar to HB 411 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
H - Voted Do Not Pass - House-Ways and Means

HB2748 Modifies requirements for physical education in schools
Sponsor Rep. Bishop Davidson (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2748 -- PHYSICAL EDUCATION IN SCHOOLS (Davidson) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education Currently, school districts must ensure that elementary school students participate in an average of 40 minutes of physical activity a day. Beginning in the 2027-2028 school year, this bill requires schools to ensure that all students in grades K-12 participate in physical activity for a certain length of time each day, as specified in the bill. The bill defines the terms and specifies the use of bilateral coordination, bone-strengthening activities, and muscle- strengthening activities. This bill creates an allowance of 10 minutes per day for any one course, subject, or class that a school district may elect to designate a time required for physical activity. Each school district and charter school governing board is to adopt a written policy for daily physical activity of students.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/28/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

HB2754 Modifies provisions relating to income tax
Sponsor Rep. Christopher Warwick (R)
Summary
Currently, there is a graduated tax imposed on taxable income of Missouri residents. Beginning January 1, 2027, a flat rate of 4.7% will be imposed on all taxable income of Missouri residents, or the top rate of tax in effect January 1, 2027, whichever is less. Modifications to the flat rate apply only to tax years that begin on or after a modification takes effect. This bill removes all existing taxable income brackets. The bill also allows for certain triggered reductions to the 4.7% flat rate by one-tenth of one percent, with no more than 10 such reductions. Currently, the Missouri combined taxable income on a combined return must include all of the income and deductions of each spouse, and Missouri taxable income of each spouse is an amount that is the same proportion of their Missouri combined taxable income as the Missouri adjusted gross income of that spouse bears to their Missouri combined adjusted gross income. This provision ends December 31, 2026. Beginning January 1, 2027, there will be one column for the calculation of total Missouri combined adjusted gross income on a Missouri income tax return. Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill increases the Missouri standard deduction to the allowable Federal standard deduction plus $4,000. Currently, a taxpayer is liable for interest on repayment of a tax credit for which he or she qualified, but was subsequently denied due to lack of available funds. This bill holds that such a taxpayer will not be held liable for any penalty or interest on any amount that is to be repaid, provided that the balance due is paid within 60 days from the notice of denial or payment arrangements have been approved. This bill also repeals the Missouri Working Family Tax Credit Act. This bill is similar to HCS HB 798 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2755 Modifies several provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Coleman (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits an assessor from reclassifying real property without first conducting an in-person consultation with the owner of record of such property. An assessor must be deemed to be in compliance with this provision if the assessor can document a good-faith effort to contact the owner of record, as described in the bill (Section 137.016,RSMo). Currently, an assessor must not increase the assessed valuation of any parcel of residential real property by more than 15% since the last reassessment without first conducting a physical inspection of the property and providing notice to the taxpayer. This bill modifies such provision by prohibiting any increase in assessments of residential real property in excess of 15%. Additionally, a property owner may request the assessor to conduct a physical inspection, provided that the assessed value must not increase as a result of such inspection (Section 137.115). Currently, certain counties are authorized to provide a tax credit for the property tax liabilities owed on an eligible taxpayer's homestead. This bill repeals such provision and instead specifies that all counties must provide a property tax credit for any real property owned by an eligible taxpayer, provided that the real property tax liability owed on the taxpayer's real property may be increased by no more than 2.5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is less. However, for any county in which any subclass of real property is considered to be valued below its true value in money, as determined in the bill, the amount by which a taxpayer's real property tax liability may increase must not exceed 7.5% per year, provided that this provision must no longer apply to a county once such subclass of real property in such county is no longer considered to be valued below its true value in money. Additionally, the bill provides that personal property tax liability owed on any individual item of personal property must not be increased above the liability owed on such item during the 2024 tax year or the first year an eligible taxpayer first incurs personal property tax liability on such personal property, whichever occurs later. Any eligible taxpayer experiencing such an increase must be eligible for a credit on the eligible taxpayer's personal property tax liability in an amount equal to such increase, as described in the bill (Sections 137.1058 and Section 137.1055) Currently, the State Tax Commission is required to equalize the valuation of each class and subclass of property among the respective counties. This bill requires the Commission to utilize ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass is valued below or above its true value. Such values must be no less than 75% and no more than 100% of true market value, as specified in the bill (Section 138.390). This bill is similar to SB 919 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2756 Modifies real property assessment percentages
Sponsor Rep. Sean Pouche (R)
Summary
This bill modifies the percentages of true value at which subclasses of real property are assessed as follows: For real property in subclass (1), the assessment is reduced from 19% to 10%; For real property in subclass (2), the assessment is reduced from 12% to 8%; For real property in subclass (3), the assessment is reduced from 32% to 20%.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2762 Modifies and creates new provisions relating to solar energy projects
Sponsor Rep. Brad Banderman (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Utilities by a vote of 16 to 3. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 2762, 2816 & 2402. Beginning August 28, 2026, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, or tangible personal property associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $4,000 per megawatt of nameplate capacity. All land associated with the project that uses solar energy to generate electricity, except for land used as setbacks or undeveloped, will be assessed as commercial property. As specified in this bill, if any public utility company has ownership of any real or personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy directly to generate electricity, such solar or wind energy project property will be valued and taxed by any local authorities having jurisdiction. Beginning January 1, 2027, for any public utility company that has a solar energy project, such solar energy project must be assessed with any solar energy property of such company assessed upon the county assessor's local tax rolls, and all other real property, excluding land, or personal property related to the solar energy project assessed using the methodology as specified in the bill. For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks, specified in the bill, from adjacent property and the property line. A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project. A solar energy project must provide written notice to the county before the start of construction, file a decommissioning plan with the county, and prior to construction, secure a bond in the amount of descommissioning the project and reclaiming the land as required in the bill. The bill also prohibits the use of eminent domain by electrical corporations for the construction or erection of any plant, tower, panel, or facility that: (1) Uses, captures, or converts wind or air currents to generate or manufacture electricity; or (2) Uses, captures, or converts the light or heat generated by the sun to generate or manufacture electricity. The bill specifies that the authority of any corporation to condemn property must extend to the acquisition of rights needed to construct, operate, and maintain the collection, distribution, communication, and transmission lines, substations, switchyards and other facilities needed to collect and deliver energy generated or manufactured by solar or wind facilities. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill would give solar developers long term clarity with reasonable requirements for facilities that protect area landowners. It will also provide consistent statewide rules for taxation of such facilities. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Banderman; Azimuth Renewables, LLC; Laura Stinson; Clean Grid Alliance; Missouri Farm Bureau; and Renew Missouri. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the provisions relating to the dissolution of a water district lowers the involvement of the district residents. The bill would allow the board to lower the threshold needed to sell, which reduces the voting power of the customers. Testifying in person against the bill were Association Of Water Districts; Tenaska; Missouri Rural Water Association; and Armorine. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the bill includes requirements for solar facilities to protect adjacent landowners and counties but that the provisions are not strict enough. The setbacks and the tax liability should be higher. The facilities are a safety risk and the local emergency services need to be trained to handle emergencies involving solar energy facilities. Testifying in person on the bill were John R. Burns; Cody Holt; Missouri Solar Energy Industries Association (MOSEIA); Mark C. Taylor; Susan Burns, Mid Missouri Landowners Alliance LLC; and Ameren Missouri. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/13/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2773 Requires school districts to provide instruction in cursive writing
Sponsor Rep. Stephanie Boykin (D)
Summary
This bill requires school districts and charter schools to provide instruction in cursive writing by the end of the fifth grade, including a proficiency test of competency in reading and writing cursive. This bill is similar to HB 1876; HB 2049; HB 2115; SB 1378 (2026); HB 346; HB 375; HB 906; and HB 1237 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2776 Establishes provisions relating to the granting of certain teaching certificates
Sponsor Rep. Willard Haley (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 12 to 5 with 1 member voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2776. This bill gives the State Board of Education (SBE) the authority to issue an associate teacher certificate to applicants that complete a background check and have a degree from a state- approved associate of applied science-level teacher preparation program or a program of a substantially similar nature that includes 60 semester hours from an institution of higher education. The teacher preparation program must include a literacy and reading instruction coursework, be accredited by the SBE, and includes a capstone project. The bill creates a three tier certification process. Tier I and Tier II associate certificate holders may only teach in grades one to six, pay into the public education employee retirement system under Sections 169.600-169.715, RSMo, and have additional criteria that must be met to be granted a full certificate of licensure, including participation in a mentor program, professional development, and an acceptable score on the state- approved teacher evaluation system, as specified. Tier III certificate holders may seek additional certification for middle school or early childhood, and pay into the public school retirement system under Sections 169.010 to 169.141. The bill provides that schools may establish separate salary schedules for teachers with associate certificates with the minimum for Tier I and Tier II set at $35,000 and the Tier III teacher at the minimum established under Section 163.172. The bill specifies provisions for mentors for Tier I associate certificate holders that may receive additional compensation or release time and includes time for observations. This bill requires that after 10 years, and every two years after that, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will provide to the Joint Committee on Public Education a report on the effectiveness of the associate teacher process and make recommendations for legislative change. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that there is a need for additional teachers as there are currently many unqualified individuals that are serving as the teacher of record due to shortages. This language would create an alternative route with additional quality training and educational pedagogy. This bill gives an opportunity at a much lower cost for many that may want to enter into education. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Haley; Matt Davis, Eldon School District; Tennille Banner, Green City R-1; Jerrod Wheeler, Knob Noster Public Schools; Brent Bates, State Fair Community College; and Mo Community College Association. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that currently there are systems in place and opportunities for students that are interested in working in education while pursuing a degree. Working in school districts while getting an education is very beneficial for both the student and the institution. The shortage of teachers is not because there is a lack of pathways but rather a lack of respect and resources, adding a lower quality opportunity will diminish the quality of educators. Testifying in person against the bill were Missouri Independent Colleges; University of MO; Barri Tinkler, Missouri State University; Council on Public Higher Education; Joshua Heimsoth; and Dr. Tim Wall. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/04/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2780 Modifies provisions governing property taxes
Sponsor Rep. Tim Taylor (R)
Summary
HCS#2 HB 2780 -- PROPERTY TAXATION (Taylor (48)) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Property Tax Reform Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase may levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate. The bill removes the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate. Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property, in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline. The bill requires that, if voters in a political subdivision approve a levy increase prior to the expiration of a previously- approved temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling will remain in effect only until the temporary levy increase expires under the terms originally approved by voters. At that time, the tax rate ceiling will be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase unless voters of the political subdivision are asked to approve an additional permanent increase and such increase is approved. This bill requires that, when voters in a political subdivision pass a tax rate increase, the political subdivision must use the current tax rate ceiling and the increase approved by the voters in establishing the rates of levy for the tax year immediately following the election. If the assessed valuation of real property in a political subdivision sees a reduction in value in the tax year immediately following the election, the political subdivision can raise its tax rates so that the revenue received from the local real property tax rates equals the amount the political subdivision would have received from the increased rates of levy had there been no reduction in the assessed valuation of real property in the political subdivision. In the event of an increased tax rate ceiling, the rate must be revenue neutral as required in Article X, Section 22 of the Constitution of Missouri. (Section 137.073, RSMo). As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals the single property tax rate and replaces the language with that relating to multiple tax rates (Section 137.079, RSMo). This bill provides that when a valuation of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, and other real properties is made by a computer, computer-assisted method, or a computer program, the burden of proof to sustain the valuation must be on the assessor at any hearing or appeal. The bill provides that, before any assessor may increase the assessed valuation of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property by more than 15% since the last assessment, the assessor must conduct a physical inspection of the property. Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of House bill 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county may also opt out of implementing certain provisions of House Bill 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate Bill 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes. This bill repeals the references to the provisions of House Bill 1150 (2002) and Senate Bill 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt out of or to implement these provisions. The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county must determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and for personal property, in the aggregate (Section 137.115, RSMo). Currently, no school district can receive more state aid for its education program than it received per weighted average daily attendance for the school year 2005-06 from the foundation formula, unless it has an operating levy for school purposes of not less than $2.75. This bill changes the operating levy floor to receive certain state aid to $2.20 beginning the 2026-27 school year. For school districts that imposed a levy of $2.75 in 2026, their maximum levy must be $2.75 in 2027. After 2027, these school districts must set their levy as provided by the Missouri Constitution (Section 163.021, RSMo). This bill contains a severability clause. This bill is similar to HB 2668 (2026).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
HB2782 Modifies provisions relating to retirement systems
Sponsor Rep. Marlon Anderson (D)
Summary
This bill allows retirees from the St. Louis Public School Retirement System to receive a one-time supplemental payment equal to the lesser of: the gross amount of their regular pension benefit or $2,000. The supplemental payment must be payable no later than September 30, 2027. This bill is similar to HB 1329 (2025) and HB 2469 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2800 Creates grant programs to assist senior citizens in the property tax appeal process
Sponsor Rep. Yolanda Young (D)
Summary
This bill allows the Department of Social Services to establish a grant program to provide funds to nonprofits that assist senior citizens in appealing their property tax assessments. The application process that a nonprofit must follow to secure grants is described in the bill. The Department must consider the following when awarding grants: (1) The nonprofit's ability to provide senior citizens with assistance in appealing property tax assessments; (2) The number of seniors the nonprofit is capable of serving; (3) The level of need in the area that the nonprofit serves; and (4) The funds available for the awards. This bill is similar to HB 1458 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2810 Requires school districts to allow youth organizations to provide information, services, and activities to students
Sponsor Rep. John Voss (R)
Summary
This bill defines "youth organization" and allows for any such organization to provide oral or written information to students in a school district regarding the organization and how such organization furthers educational interests and civic involvement and provides services and activities to participating youth. The bill provides specificity for time, place and manner requirements and school districts must make a good-faith effort to provide opportunity for youth organizations at least once in each school year. The bill outlines background check requirements for any representative of a youth organization.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2816 Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Sponsor Rep. Kent Haden (R)
Summary
Currently, the definition of "tangible personal property", for the purposes of property taxation, includes solar panels, racking systems, inverters, and related solar equipment, components, materials, and supplies installed in connection with solar photovoltaic energy systems that were constructed and producing solar energy prior to August 9, 2022. This subclass of tangible personal property is assessed at five percent of its true value in money. This bill removes the limitation that the property must be constructed and producing energy prior to August 9, 2022. Currently, where real property is used for more than one purpose resulting in different classifications, the county assessor must allocate to each classification the percentage of the true value in money for the property devoted to each use. This bill specifies that any property classified as agricultural property that is used for the purpose of energy production activities for resale must be proportionally calculated, assessed, and reclassified as commercial property. Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity, the tax liability will be equal to $2,500 per megawatt of nameplate capacity and adjusted annually for inflation. All land associated with the project that used solar energy will be assessed as commercial property. This does not prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or certain abatement agreements, and it does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100, RSMo. Beginning January 1, 2027, land associated with a solar energy project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity in excess of five megawatts must be classified as subclass (3) real property and assessed as commercial property. This bill also provides that, for certain public utility companies that have a solar energy project, the solar energy project must be assessed using a specific methodology. This does not apply to agreements authorized under Chapter 100. The bill also provides that for real or tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar or wind energy to generate electricity, including equipment used to support the integration of a solar generation asset into an existing system, must be valued and taxed by local authorities. This does not apply to certain photovoltaic energy systems or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100. This bill provides that a county commission can choose to opt-in, upon a majority vote, to the provision that limits the total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in the county to four percent of all cropland in the county or less. Acres owned by utilities or electrical corporations must not be included in the four percent county calculation. The acreage is determined by the perimeter of the actual solar panels. County commissions choosing to adopt the four percent limit option must have procedures and a severability clause in those procedures. For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, the project will be subject to certain setbacks specified in the bill as measured from the nearest occupied dwelling, church, or school to the perimeter of the nearest solar panel. This setback must not apply to an official agreement between the project and the property owner. This setback does not apply to solar energy projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2025, or to agreements authorized under Chapter 100. A solar energy company must secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection to the electrical grid prior to construction of a solar energy project. This bill is the similar to HB 2402 (2026) and HCS HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/26/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2762

HB2827 Modifies provisions relating to corporal punishment in schools
Sponsor Rep. Jo Doll (D)
Summary
This bill mandates each district to prohibit the use of corporal punishment and spanking in schools. The bill defines "corporal punishment" as the infliction of pain by an adult upon the body of a child as penalty for doing something that has been disapproved of by the adult. This bill is similar to HB 121 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2829 Requires arbitration agreements for certain disputes to be in a separate agreement
Sponsor Rep. Eric Woods (D)
Summary
This bill provides that no claim brought under Merchandising Practices, Sections 407.010, RSMo to 407.315, will be subject to arbitration unless both parties agree to arbitration in a separate written agreement. This bill is similar to HB 983 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2839 Modifies provisions governing a high school examination on American history, institutions, and civics
Sponsor Rep. Richard West (R)
Summary
This bill requires the State Board of Education to form a committee composed of former teachers that have served in elective public office to develop a standardized statewide examination on the provisions and principles of the Constitution of the United States and of the state of Missouri, and in American history, American institutions, and American civics. The State Historical Society of Missouri will staff the committee, and the standardized statewide examination must be passed before students may graduate from any public or private school.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2841 Modifies provisions governing the Missouri assessment program test
Sponsor Rep. Richard West (R)
Summary
This bill requires that for the 2026-27 school year and all subsequent school years, the State Board of Education will place 20 additional questions on the Missouri Assessment Program test relating to slavery, the Reconstruction era, and Jim Crow laws. The bill requires that these questions be graded separately to determine a student's knowledge and to measure how well each school district is teaching facts related to such subjects.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2849 Requires newly purchased or contracted school buses of a school district to be zero-emission vehicles, beginning January 1, 2037
Sponsor Rep. Anthony Ealy (D)
Summary
This bill enacts provisions relating to contracts for zero- emission school buses. The bill specifies that a contract between a school district and a party contracting to provide transportation services to the school district is jointly renewable at the end of the contract term for a term no more than 15 years, and must include all of the terms of the previous contract and any provisions increasing rates based on increased costs. If the school district can exercise an option either to purchase the buses or cancel the lease at the end of each annual period during the contract, the contract may be made for a term not more than 20 years. The bill allows for a contract to be negotiated annually within the contract period when economic factors indicate negotiation is necessary to maintain an equitable pricing structure. Renegotiation is subject to the approval of both contracting parties. Any rental, lease, or lease-purchase of a school bus must comply with Chapter 177, RSMo. The bill also requires that, beginning January 1, 2037, 100% of all newly purchased or contracted school buses must be zero- emission vehicles, where feasible. If a school district determines that the purchase or lease of a zero-emission school bus is not feasible due to both terrain and route constraints, it may request a one-time extension for a term not to exceed five years. The school district must reasonably demonstrate that a daily planned bus route for transporting pupils to and from school cannot be serviced through available zero-emission technology, and the Department of Natural Resources, consulting with the Missouri Air Conservation Commission, will determine whether to grant a one-time extension. Beginning January 1, 2042, if a school district with an average daily attendance of 350 or less still determines that the purchase or lease of a zero-emission school bus in not feasible, the school district may request annual extensions with the last extension expiring on January 1, 2047. The same requirements apply to these one year extensions. This bill is similar to HB 101 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2855 Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Sponsor Rep. John Voss (R)
Summary
HB 2855 -- WORKERS' COMPENSATION (Voss) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Emerging Issues Currently, compensation for a workers' compensation claimant who has a permanent total disability must follow certain rules and guidelines. This bill states that upon the filing of a written agreement signed by the claimant and his or her attorney, the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission of Missouri must change the name, information, or fee arrangement of the attorney or law firm associated with the claimant's case. Currently, the Commission may review an existing workers' compensation award and change the amount. This bill states that upon the filing of a new award agreement signed by the claimant and his or her attorney and the new attorney, the Commission must change the name, information, or fee arrangement of the attorney or law firm associated with the claimant's case. Current law allows the Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation to impose taxes or surcharges for different purposes relating to the administration of workers' compensation, with such tax rate being rounded up to the nearest one-half of a percentage point. This bill modifies the tax or surcharge rates to be rounded up to the nearest one-tenth of a percentage point. This bill is similar to SB 932 (2026).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/21/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws

HB2857 Enacts provisions governing United States founding documents displayed in public schools
Sponsor Rep. Mike Costlow (R)
Summary
This bill requires public schools to display the Constitution of the United States, the Bill of Rights, and the Declaration of Independence in a prominent location accessible to all students.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2859 Reduces the assessment percentage of certain personal property and provides a personal property tax exemption for certain personal property upon adoption of a constitutional amendment authorizing such exemption
Sponsor Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 7 to 3. Beginning January 1st of the calendar year immediately following the adoption of a constitutional amendment authorizing the exemption of tangible personal property from taxation under Article X, Section 6 of the Constitution of Missouri, this bill will exempt farm machinery and motor vehicles from personal property taxation. Currently, assessors annually assess all personal property at 33.3% of its true value in money. Beginning January 1, 2027, the percentage of the true value in money at which personal property is assessed will be 30% of its true value in money and the amount will be reduced every two years by 2% until the calendar year 2041. For calendar year 2041, and every year thereafter, personal property must be assessed at 16% of its true value in money. This bill is similar to HB 988 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill will allow for more predictability for taxpayers as it relates to their motor vehicles. Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Matthiesen. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that this bill will impact smaller communities that have limited or no sales tax base to replace the lost revenue caused by this bill. Testifying in person against the bill were Missouri Council of School Administrators; and Missouri Municipal League. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/17/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2860 Modifies and establishes provisions relating to elementary and secondary education
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
This bill creates code of conduct standards for members of school boards and for the governing board of charter schools. The bill requires a public disclosure of member and employee conflicts of interest as specified, including payments in excess of $500 per year to the following: superintendents, administrative staff, chief purchasing officers, and general counsel for school districts. Such individuals must disclose additional information as specified in the bill. The bill prevents school districts from retaining any attorney or law firm for the purpose of providing counsel during an administrative or legal proceeding concerning a student if the attorney or law firm employs or contracts with the school district's members or employees (Section 162.106, RSMo). This bill requires that for hearings regarding children with disabilities, the burden of proof and the burden of production will be on the school district regarding any matter related to identification, evaluation, reevaluation, classification, educational placement, disciplinary action, or the provision of free appropriate public education. The bill provides protections for students in a IEP proceeding, including mediation, being allowed to remain in the present educational placement or stay put during the pendency of the proceedings(Section 162.961). This bill requires that the most recent student special education records as defined in the bill are to be retained by school districts as part of the student's permanent record and such records may not be destroyed by the district (Section 167.027). This bill is similar to HB 3238 (2026) and HB 1714 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2865 Modifies the definition of "reasonable fees and expenses" as it relates to administrative proceedings or civil actions arising from administrative proceedings
Sponsor Rep. Cameron Parker (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Judiciary by a vote of 12 to 0. This bill repeals from the definition of "reasonable fees and expenses", as it relates to civil actions or agency proceedings, the prohibition on attorneys being awarded more than $75 per hour unless the court determines that a special factor justifies a higher fee. This bill is similar to HB 179 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this changes a provision in agency proceedings that sets attorneys? fees in these proceedings. The bill removes that amount and changes it to a reasonable amount. The fee hasn?t been changed since 1989. Any licensed professional who has to defend his or her license can hire an attorney and it?s hard to find one to do it at such a rate, so they want to make sure these attorneys are fairly compensated. It would make it easier to find an attorney. Removing the cap would allow good judgment to be shown in assigning the fee and will help bring great representation to licensees in the State. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Parker; The Missouri Bar; and David Barrett. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/08/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Judiciary

HB2866 Creates, repeals, and modifies provisions governing elementary and secondary education
Sponsor Rep. Dane Diehl (R)
Summary
This bill creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary education. MISSOURI EMPOWERMENT SCHOLARSHIP ACCOUNTS PROGRAM (Sections 135.712, 135.713, 135.715, 135.716, 160.410, 160.415, 166.700, and 166.720) The bill authorizes the General Assembly to fund student scholarships through the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program by appropriating funds to the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Fund. Such scholarships must be awarded in an order and in amounts established in current law and must be governed through parent agreements with educational assistance organizations, as provided in current law. No provision of law relating to the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program will be construed to limit the appropriation authority of the General Assembly. The cumulative amount of tax credits that can be allocated in any one calendar year is doubled, increasing from $75 million to $150 million. The bill requires a maximum of 15 educational assistance organizations, rather than 10, in any school year. No more than 11 of such organizations, rather than seven, will have their principal place of business in Greene County, Jackson County, St. Charles County, St. Louis County, or the City of St. Louis. Where capacity is available, a charter school must enroll all students who transfer under the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program. A charter school can receive tuition payments from such students. The definition of "qualified student" is modified by repealing provisions requiring students to have an individualized education plan (IEP) developed under Federal law or to be a member of a household with a total annual income that does not exceed 300% of the income standard used to qualify for free and reduced price lunches. The bill repeals a provision allowing school districts and charter schools to continue including students in the calculation of the district's or school's weighted average daily attendance for up to five years after the student receives an empowerment scholarship and leaves the school district or charter school. CHARTER SCHOOLS (Sections 160.400, 160.405, and 160.415) Under this bill, charter schools can be operated in any school district in the State in which they are currently authorized and , in the 2027-28 school year, in any school district with a student attendance greater than 6,500. The bill repeals provisions limiting charter schools to certain school districts and provisions relating to the accreditation status of school districts in which a charter school can operate. The proposed charter of a charter school sponsored and approved by the Missouri Charter Public School Commission will not require the approval of the State Board of Education. The bill repeals provisions restricting certain state aid payments only to those charter schools in certain school districts. SCHOOL PROPERTY (Sections 160.422 and 162.092) Under this bill, cities, counties, and school districts, defined as political subdivisions, must not adopt or enforce any ordinance, policy, or resolution that prevents property they sell, lease, or transfer from being used by a charter school for any lawful educational purpose. The bill also prohibits any deed restriction, property use restriction, or other such restriction that limits property to specific uses that exclude use by a charter public school for any lawful educational purpose. Any existing restriction that bars property previously used for educational purposes from being used for future educational purposes by a charter school is void. Any ordinance, policy, regulation, deed, use restriction, or contract made in violation of this bill is void from its inception. Additionally, when a school district offers to purchase or lease an unused facility, as that term is defined in the bill, to a party other than a public entity, the contract must include a right of first refusal allowing a public entity to purchase or lease the property first. The term public entity includes the State of Missouri and any of its political subdivisions, such as cities, counties, boards, agencies, or authorities. If the offer to purchase or lease is accepted, such school district must post a public notice on its website stating that the property is available and include the property's square footage, the district's contact information, and a statement that the right of first refusal expires 60 days after this notification. If multiple public entities express interest in the unused building or facility, the school district must decide which entity will purchase or lease the property. During negotiations, the school district can choose whether to sell or lease the property, at fair market value or less. A lease will allow reasonable access and use of shared common areas. If a public entity leases the entire facility and incurs debt to make improvements, the school district will subordinate its lease interest to that debt. The public entity will have six months from the date of its written offer to complete the purchase or lease. While leasing, the public entity will be responsible for all direct expenses, including utilities, insurance, maintenance, property taxes, and repairs. If a public entity later decides to sell a facility it purchased from a school district, such public entity must first offer the property back to that district, following the same procedures set forth in the bill. STUDENT TRANSFERS Sections (167.241, 167.895, and 167.898) Current law authorizes students who reside in an unaccredited school district to transfer to an accredited school district in the same or an adjoining county under certain conditions. This bill repeals and modifies provisions limiting these transfers to students in unaccredited school districts. Under the bill, any student can transfer to another public school or charter school, beginning in the 2027-28 school year and in all subsequent school years. Each school board must adopt a policy to determine its transfer capacity for each grade level and school no later than October 27, 2026. The policy will be publicly posted on the school district's website. By July 15, 2027, and by the first of each month thereafter, each school district must report to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) the school district's average per pupil expenditure, the number of available enrollment slots by grade level and school, and publish the number of available slots for each grade level and school in a prominent and publicly accessible place on the school district's website. DESE must publish and update, at least monthly, each school district's transfer capacity on an online portal accessible via the DESE website and must include a search function for users to identify schools with capacity to accept transfer students near their home address. Parents of students who wish to transfer must notify DESE by August 1, 2027, and by the first day of each month thereafter, and DESE must assign students to a receiving district or charter school as provided in the bill. A receiving district must accept all students who apply and are assigned to the district, so long as there is capacity for each student. School board policies must not discriminate against any student on the basis of such student's residential address, academic performance, athletic ability, disability, race, ethnicity, sex, or free and reduced price lunch status. If a request for transfer is denied, an appeal can be taken to the State Board of Education (SBE) by sending the appeal by certified mail to the superintendent of the receiving school district and to the SBE. Any appeal not heard by the SBE within 60 calendar days will be deemed granted with immediate effect. DESE must develop forms for filing appeals, and the SBE must promulgate rules to establish the appeals process. The bill repeals provisions requiring sending districts to make tuition payments to receiving districts. Instead, for purposes of calculating state and federal aid, each transfer student will be counted as a resident of the receiving district in which the student is enrolled. Tuition must not be charged to any student or to his or her parent or legal guardian. If the receiving district is part of a special school district, the sending district must contract with the special school district for the entirety of the costs to provide special education and related services, excluding transportation. The special school district can contract with a sending district for transportation, or the sending district can provide transportation on its own. The bill outlines school districts' responsibilities for the provision of special education and related services to students with disabilities. A special school district must continue to provide special education and related services, excluding transportation, to students with disabilities who transfer to another school within the special school district. If the sending district is a metropolitan school district, it will remain responsible for providing special education and related services, including transportation, to students with disabilities who transfer to a receiving district. A special school district in an adjoining county to a metropolitan school district can contract with the metropolitan school district for the reimbursement of special education and related services provided by the special school district for transfer students. A receiving district that is not part of a special school district will not be responsible for providing transportation to transfer students, regardless of whether transportation is identified as a related service within a student's IEP. A sending district can contract with a receiving district that is not part of a special school district for transportation of students with disabilities. A seven-director or urban school district can contract with a receiving district that is not part of a special school district in the same or an adjoining county for the reimbursement of special education and related services provided by the receiving district. DESE must designate at least one receiving district or charter school to which each sending district must provide transportation. A sending district will be required to provide transportation only to the school district or charter school designated by DESE. ADMINISTRATOR CERTIFICATION (Section 168.189) Under this bill, a school district can consider, but may not require, any criteria greater than that which is necessary to obtain a Missouri initial administrator certificate under rules promulgated by the SBE. A school district can employ such an individual if the individual holds a master's degree or its equivalent, has at least eight years of experience in an executive role with responsibilities described in the bill, and a waiver specific to the applicant has been granted to the school district for this purpose. Such a waiver will be valid for no longer than three years and eligible for renewal once. Upon conclusion of the maximum six year waiver period, the SBE can grant the applicant a permanent certificate to serve as an administrator in any school district in the State. This bill is similar to SB 1496 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2867 Requires the department of elementary and secondary education to develop a curriculum on personal finance to be used by school districts
Sponsor Rep. Chanel Mosley (D)
Summary
Under the provisions of this bill, all school districts, starting in the 2027-28 school year, must require students to complete a one-half unit of credit in personal finance in order to graduate high school. Schools can waive the requirement for certain transfer students, as specified in the bill. This bill requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to convene a work group to develop and recommend academic performance standards relating to the one-half unit of credit in personal finance. The bill outlines specific components for the financial literacy instruction standards. Members of the work group must include educators who provide instruction in personal finance, a representative from the Department, members of the banking industry, or other groups specified in the bill, with at least 25% of the members consisting of educators. The State Board of Education (SBE) must adopt and implement academic performance standards for the 2027-28 school year and all subsequent school years. Every seven years, the SBE will review the academic performance standards to determine whether they should be updated to reflect trends and best practices in the current economy. This bill is similar to HB 2303 (2026) and to HB 1180 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/23/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Financial Institutions

HB2869 Provides a homestead exemption for disabled veterans
Sponsor Rep. Mike Jones (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Tax Reform by a vote of 9 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2869. This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Homestead Tax Credit Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, if adopted by county order, ordinance, or resolution, a county may grant an annual real property tax credit for the qualifying homestead of a disabled veteran that has an assessed value not to exceed $500,000. This $500,000 limit on assessed value must be adjusted annually for inflation. The county may grant a tax credit for any percentage of the qualified amount that does not exceed 100% of the disabled veteran?s property tax liability. Before January of any year, the governing body of a county may adjust this tax credit percentage for the next general reassessment year by ordinance. If the qualifying disabled veteran passes, this real property tax credit must carry over to the benefit of the surviving spouse as long as certain conditions are met. This real property tax credit must not reduce assessed valuations and must not be construed as an exemption. If an eligible owner receives this real property tax credit, he or she will no longer be eligible for any other real property tax relief or tax credit relating to the owner?s qualifying residence. For the purpose of calculating property tax levies, the total amount of these real property tax credits must be considered tax revenue actually received by the county or other political subdivision. This bill is similar to HB 2588 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill is a responsible, commonsense, and targeted road map to ensure disabled veterans are not taxed out of their homes. Those in support of the bill state that the bill ensures the homestead tax credit for disabled veterans would not have the same issues as SB 190. Supporters of the bill say veterans have been waiting for bills like this to actually pass. Those in support of the bill say this bill leaves the tax credit up to the counties to impose. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Jones; Troy Williams, Missouri Association of Veterans Organization; and Michael W Schroeder, Department of Missouri Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW). OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that Department of Revenue did not receive this bill and others from Legislative Oversight in a timely manner to ensure a fiscal note could be done. Department of Revenue believes there would be savings because those who take the tax credit proposed by this bill could not take some of the other property tax credits. Testifying in person on the bill was Zachary Wyatt, Department Of Revenue. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/28/2026
H - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2872 Creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to literacy of elementary school students
Sponsor Rep. Cathy Jo Loy (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2872 -- LITERACY OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS (Loy) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education This bill creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to literacy of elementary school students. EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Sections 161.097) The bill requires educator preparation programs to instruct teacher candidates on the selection and use of high-quality reading curricula and instructional materials that do not include the three-cueing system as a strategy for decoding, as defined in current law. Beginning July 1, 2027, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) must annually review and publicly report on the compliance of educator preparation programs with literacy and reading instruction requirements of current law and those established in the bill. The review must evaluate whether instruction is grounded in the components of evidence-based reading instruction and whether prohibited practices, such as the three-cueing system, are excluded from coursework. Educator preparation programs not in compliance with these requirements will not be approved to certify new teachers. STATE AID FOR READING INSTRUCTION (Section 161.241) In addition to training and materials in best practices in reading pedagogies, the bill provides that the current Evidence- Based Reading Instruction Program Fund may be used to fund training in structured literacy and dyslexia-informed practices. The bill also provides for reading tutoring programs inside regular school hours, rather than only outside regular school hours. IDENTIFICATION OF READING DEFICIENCIES (Sections 167.268, 167.340, and 167.645) The bill establishes the "Missouri Reading Screener" as a literacy-based reading assessment approved by DESE and adopted by a school district or charter school to be administered to students at the end of kindergarten and in first grade through third grade. The screening must be administered three times per year in every school district and charter school in the State. The Screener will score each student and provide a numerical value relative to the student's grade level in one of the following categories: "at-risk", "approaching expectations", "meets expectations", and "exceeds expectations". Proficiency benchmarks associated with these categories will be determined by DESE. Each school district and charter school must assess all students in first grade through third grade within the first 20 days of the school year and send the results home within the first 30 days. DESE will provide the Screener to school districts and charter schools at no cost. The Screener will also be used to comply with dyslexia screening requirements established in current law. Student results on the Screener must not be used to make decisions concerning the accreditation of a public school or school district. A student who scores "approaching expectations" on the Screener will be identified as having a reading deficiency. A student who scores below "at risk" on the Screener will be identified as having a substantial reading deficiency. Beginning with the 2027-28 school year, a school district or charter school must notify the parent of a student with a substantial reading deficiency and discuss whether the student should be retained in grade level based on relevant information. If a student has a reading deficiency or substantial reading deficiency at the end of grade two the student's parent will meet with the school to discuss the deficiency and must acknowledge in writing that the student will be retained and the parents or guardians must agree to participate in parent training workshops or parent-guided home reading activities or both. A parent or guardian who refuses to meet, sign, or agree as required will not prevent the student from receiving additional interventions or from being retained by the school district. Retention of a third-grade student with a substantial reading deficiency is mandatory unless the child qualifies for a good cause exemption or scores "approaching expectations" or higher on a retest opportunity through the Screener, as specified in the bill. A good cause exemption can be granted to students who are disabled and have an individualized education plan (IEP), participate in the statewide summative English language arts assessment and who participate in certain plans outlined in the bill. A good cause exemption may also be granted to a student who identifies as an English language learner and has had less than two years of instruction in an English language, or a student who has already been retained at least once in kindergarten to third grade. To request a good cause exemption, a student's teacher must submit documentation to the school principal recommending the student's promotion, including the type of exemption being requested and the child's existing reading improvement plan or IEP, as appropriate. The school principal must discuss the recommendation with the teacher and the parents or guardians of the student and determine whether the student qualifies for a good cause exemption. If the school principal determines that the student qualifies for the good cause exemption, the school principal will make the recommendation in writing to the superintendent, who will accept or reject the school principal's recommendation in writing. The school district must assist schools with notifying parents of students who are retained of the reasons for the retention, along with a description of the proposed interventions and supports that will be provided to the child to remedy the identified area or areas of reading deficiency in the following school year. In addition to current strategies provided to students identified as having a reading deficiency or substantial reading deficiency, the bill adds "read at home" plans outlined in a parental contract, including parent training workshops and guided home reading activities that are aligned to scientifically based reading research. Intensive reading instruction provided to students exhibiting a reading deficiency or substantial reading deficiency cannot include the three-cueing system for decoding and schools must establish an intensive acceleration class for students retained in kindergarten through third grade. The acceleration class must include students who were previously retained with reduced teacher-student ratio and provide reading instruction for the majority of the day. By October 1st annually, each school board must submit a written report to DESE that contains certain information regarding reading instruction, such as the board's policies regarding student retention and promotion, the number and percentage of students identified as having reading deficiencies or substantial reading deficiencies by grade level, the number and percentage of all students retained in kindergarten to third grade due to substantial reading deficiencies, and the total number and percentage of third-grade students who were promoted with good cause exemptions, as specified in the bill. The bill requires public schools to publish the title and author of all reading curriculum materials by grade and reading level. THREE-CUEING SYSTEM MODEL OF READING INSTRUCTION (Section 170.014) Current law provides that instruction in word reading cannot rely primarily on the "three-cueing system". The bill changes the provision and instead provides that instruction in decoding will not include strategies based on the three-cueing system in any form. This bill is similar to SB 1442 (2026).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB2875 Requires school districts and charter schools to notify parents if schools use tutoring services or programs owned by a foreign entity
Sponsor Rep. Brandon Phelps (R)
Summary
This bill requires school districts and charter schools to notify parents of enrolled students if the school uses a tutoring program or service with at least 50% ownership interest held outside of the United States. The notice must include the name of the program and the ownership of the program, as specified in the bill. This bill is similar to HCS HB 1446 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2878 Modifies provisions governing the school calendar
Sponsor Rep. Jamie Gragg (R)
Summary
Currently school boards must prepare a school calendar with an opening date no earlier than 14 days prior to the first Monday in September. This bill allows districts to set an opening day 21 days prior to the first Monday in September.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2887 Establishes the "Missouri Healthy Schools Act" and prohibits public schools from serving, selling, or allowing a third party to sell ultraprocessed food during the school day
Sponsor Rep. Holly Jones (R)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Healthy Schools Act" and prohibits public schools from serving, selling, or allowing a third party to sell "ultraprocessed food", as defined in the Act, on campus during the school day. Beginning with the 2027-2028 school year, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must post on its website a standardized form that public schools may use to certify compliance with the provisions of the Act, along with a list of each public school that has provided the certification of compliance to the Department. This bill is similar to SB 1290 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2890 Modifies provisions relating to the taxation of mineral rights
Sponsor Rep. Tony Harbison (R)
Summary
This bill clarifies that mineral rights and interests that are owned by an individual other than the landowner must be assessed and taxed separately to the mineral rights or interest holder as real property, regardless of whether the land is federally, state, or county owned. If these mineral rights are owned by a different person than the landowner, the property taxes for those rights or interests must not become a lien.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2893 Changes the filing location for school board candidates
Sponsor Rep. Renee Reuter (R)
Summary
This bill modifies the current process for school board candidate filing for school board elections in school districts located wholly within one county. The bill requires candidates to file at the election authority or county clerk's office of the county in which the candidate resides. The election authority of the county in which the school district is located will designate the order and process for any drawing of candidate names for the order of the ballot. This bill is similar to HB 458(2025) and HB 1744 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2899 Modifies provisions governing design-build contracts
Sponsor Rep. Anthony Ealy (D)
Summary
This bill adds "progressive design-build contracts", as defined in the bill, to numerous provisions of law related to design- build contracts. Currently, a design criteria consultant must be employed by a political subdivision to perform certain tasks related to design- build projects. This bill allows a design criteria consultant to be employed by a political subdivision, but does not require it. The bill outlines the necessary elements of a request for proposal for a progressive design-build contract. Political subdivisions are required to solicit proposals in a two -stage process. Phase I is the solicitation and evaluation of the qualifications of design-builders. Phase II is the solicitation and evaluation of proposals describing the design-builder's approach to design development, preconstruction services, and construction of the project. Various criteria that the political subdivision must consider during each phase are described in the bill. The political subdivision has the discretion to disqualify any design-builder that the political subdivision finds lacks the minimum qualifications required to perform the work. The political subdivision will use criteria described in the bill to select no more than five qualified design-builders, who will be given a specified amount of time to assemble phase II proposals. Evaluation of phase II proposals must be qualifications-based. Price considerations are for the preconstruction phase services only. The political subdivision will rank the phase II proposals according to criteria described in the bill. Following the evaluation, the political subdivision can enter into negotiations with the highest-ranked design-builder to establish a preconstruction agreement. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, the political subdivision can begin negotiations with the next highest-ranked design-builder. During the preconstruction phase, the design-builder and the political subdivision will collaborate to establish a fixed contract amount or a guaranteed maximum price. Upon acceptance of the price and contract terms, the parties may amend the contract to authorize construction. This bill is similar to HB 2474 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2900 Modifies provisions governing Missouri empowerment scholarship accounts
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Douglas (D)
Summary
The bill modifies the current definition for "qualified student" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Program to include students with a 504 plan that is specifically for a disability that limits one or major life activities, as specified. This bill also modifies the definition for "qualified school" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Program to include in the definition that a qualified school cannot discriminate based on religion, sexual orientation, or gender identity or expression. The bill also prohibits otherwise qualified schools that have discriminatory creeds, practices, admission policies, or curriculum from participating in the Program. This bill is similar to HB 2893 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2909 Requires instruction on human sexuality and development in schools
Sponsor Rep. Cathy Jo Loy (R)
Summary
This bill modifies the course materials and instruction relating to human sexuality to include, beginning in the 2026-27 school year, a human growth and development discussion. The bill requires districts and charter schools to require such instruction beginning in grade three and outlines requirements including requiring a high definition video of fetal development and the "Meet Baby Olivia" video, showing the process of fertilization and every stage of human development. The bill specifies that the Attorney General has standing to enforce the requirements and provides a cause of action for damages and relief. This bill is similar to HB 1701 and HB 2581 (2026); HB 1576 (2024); and HB 461 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2913 Establishes provisions providing teachers with immunity if the teacher intervenes in incidents involving violence
Sponsor Rep. Bill Irwin (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 2913 & 3228 -- IMMUNITY FOR INTERVENING IN CERTAIN INCIDENTS OF VIOLENCE (Irwin) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education This bill provides immunity from civil liability for a teacher, and the school districts or charter schools that the teacher works for, if the teacher intervenes in an incident involving violence in order to safeguard himself or herself or a student. The bill requires the teacher to follow procedures and to intervene in good faith in a manner that the teacher reasonably believes is afforded the defense of justification under Chapter 563, RSMo. The bill prevents school districts from the implementation of a policy that prevents teachers from protecting themselves or students.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/30/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

HB2914 Creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to literacy of elementary school students
Sponsor Rep. Ed Lewis (R)
Summary
This bill creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to literacy of elementary school students. EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Section 161.097) The bill requires teacher education programs to instruct teacher candidates on the selection and use of high-quality reading curricula and instructional materials. The bill repeals a requirement for teacher candidates to be instructed on best practices in the field of literacy instruction as recommended by the literacy advisory council. Beginning July 1, 2027, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) will annually review and publicly report on the compliance of educator preparation programs with literacy and reading instruction requirements of current law and those established in the bill. The review will evaluate whether instruction is grounded in the components of evidence-based reading instruction and educator preparation programs not in compliance with these requirements must not be approved to certify new teachers. STATE AID FOR READING INSTRUCTION (Section 161.241) The bill expands evidence-based reading instruction to all active teachers in kindergarten through grade three and provides that the current Evidence-Based Reading Instruction Program Fund can be used to fund reading tutoring programs inside regular school hours, rather than only outside regular school hours. Subject to appropriation, DESE must remit to each school district and charter school $500 for each fourth grade student who exhibited a substantial reading deficiency in any of grades kindergarten to grade three, or who was identified as dyslexic, and who subsequently scores at the proficient level or higher in reading on the annual summative English language arts assessment administered to fourth grade students. IDENTIFICATION OF READING DEFICIENCIES (Sections 167.268, 167.340, and 167.645) The bill requires school districts to provide summer school for reading improvement instruction for students that do not meet the state's objectives for reading as demonstrated by performance on the Missouri universal reading literacy assessment established in Section 167.645, RSMo. The bill establishes the "Missouri Universal Reading Literacy Assessment", a uniform, universal, literacy-based reading assessment administered to students in kindergarten through grade three (K-3) in every school district and charter school in the State. The Assessment will score each student in one of the following categories: below basic, basic, grade-level, proficient, or advanced. Proficiency benchmarks associated with these categories will be determined by DESE. School districts and charter schools must assess all students in grades K-3 on the Assessment during three annual administration windows established by DESE. The first annual administration window must occur within the first 20 days of enrollment. DESE must provide the Assessment to school districts and charter schools at no cost. The Assessment will be used to comply with dyslexia screening requirements established in current law and to screen for characteristics of dyslexia and reading deficiency and assess other skills detailed in the bill. Student results on the screener will not be used to make decisions concerning the accreditation of a public school or school district. The bill repeals a provision requiring school districts and charter schools to assess newly enrolled students in grades 1-5 on a reading assessment selected from a state-approved list. A student who scores "basic" on the Assessment will be identified as having a reading deficiency. A student who scores "below basic" on the Assessment will be identified as having a substantial reading deficiency. A school district or charter school must notify the parent within 30 days after the identification of a student with a substantial reading deficiency that, if the child's substantial reading deficiency is not corrected by the end of third grade, the child will not be promoted to fourth grade unless the child qualifies for a good cause exemption. Retention of a third-grade student with a substantial reading deficiency is mandatory unless the unless the child qualifies for a good cause exemption or scores basic or higher on a retest opportunity through the Assessment, as provided in the bill. A good cause exemption can be granted to students under certain conditions specified in the bill. To request a good cause exemption, a student's teacher must submit documentation to the school principal recommending the student's promotion, including the type of exemption being requested and the child's existing reading improvement plan or individualized education plan, as appropriate. The school principal will discuss the recommendation with the teacher and determine whether the student qualifies for a good cause exemption. If the school principal determines that the student qualifies for the good cause exemption, the school principal must make such recommendation in writing to the superintendent, who will accept or reject the school principal's recommendation in writing. The school district will assist schools with notifying parents of students who are retained of the reasons for the retention, along with a description of the proposed interventions and supports that will be provided to the child to remedy the identified area or areas of reading deficiency in the following school year. School districts must establish an intensive acceleration class for all retained students that will have a reduced teacher- student ratio and provide explicit, systematic, sequential, and cumulative reading instruction and intervention for the majority of student contact time daily. By October 1 annually, each school board will report in writing to DESE certain information regarding reading instruction, such as the board's policies regarding student retention and promotion, the number and percentage of students identified as having reading deficiencies or substantial reading deficiencies, the number and percentage of all students retained in K-3 due to substantial reading deficiencies, and the total number and percentage of third-grade students who were promoted with good cause exemptions, as provided in the bill. LITERARY ADVISORY COUNCIL (Section 186.080) The bill repeals the statute establishing the Literacy Advisory Council and repeals the Councils duties, including allowing for its recommendations to the Commissioner of Education and the State Board of Education. This bill is similar to HB 2914 and SB 1442 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2918 Establishes the "Cronkite Journalistic Standards and New Voices Act" to protect the freedom of press in school-sponsored media
Sponsor Rep. Scott Miller (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 11 to 3 with 3 members voting present. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2918. This bill establishes the "Cronkite Journalistic Standards and New Voices Act", which provides that in both public high schools and public institutions of higher education, a student journalist, as defined in the bill, has the right to exercise freedom of speech and of the press in school-sponsored media if such media qualifies as a news source. The bill defines "Cronkite Journalistic Standards" as standards required of a news source. Standards include but are not limited to; separating news and commentary, specific restrictions that commentary and editorial material may only constitute 10% or less of news sources; and news sources should not perceived to support or oppose any covered subject. In school districts, the district and student-media advisors may regulate the number, length, frequency, and format of school- sponsored media. School districts must not engage in prior restraint of school-sponsored media except in the circumstances specified in the bill. Student journalists are responsible for determining the content of school-sponsored media, while student-media advisors are responsible for teaching and encouraging expression and the standards of English and journalism. No student-media advisor will be subject to disciplinary actions described in the bill for refusal to abridge or infringe upon freedom of expression. No publication or other exercise of the rights provided under this bill shall be deemed an expression of school or institutional policy. No school district, institution of higher education, or employee of these entities will be held liable in any civil or criminal action for any publication or other exercise of rights provided under this bill, except to the extent that such an entity or person actively participated in conduct that is the subject of a civil or criminal action. School districts and their employees may also be liable if they knew of the conduct and failed to take timely action to prevent or withdraw the publication or expression that is the subject of the action. Student journalists who are not minors may be liable based on material for which they were responsible or involved. School districts must adopt a written freedom of the press policy that includes reasonable provisions for the time, place, and manner of student expression. The policy may also restrict speech that is offensive, threatening, or that fits other similar descriptions provided in the bill. This bill is similar to SB 258 (2025). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the 1st amendment protection of the press is an important concept that should be protected for student journalists. Many states have similar language. Freedom of the press is important for democracy and essential for helping to keep administration honest. This language aligns with current jurisprudence and fixes the infringement impact from the Hazelwood court case from the 1980s. Personal testimony from students that are current members of school media staff indicated that having protections are very important to them in providing a quality product. Student journalism is part of the conscience of school and community and this language will function to preserve rights of students with guardrails. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Miller; The Student Press Law Center; Cathy Kuhlmeier, Cathy Kuhlmeier Foundation; Charlie Balestra; Haowen Liu; Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE); Missouri National Education Association; Shane Lagesse; Sophia Anderson; Arnie Dienoff; Missouri Press Association; and Americans For Prosperity. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say this clarifies tension between Supreme Court decisions on 1st amendment protections especially in regard to schools and universities. Testifying in person on the bill was Jared Schroeder. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2921 Establishes provisions relating to civil liability for publishing or distributing material harmful to minors on the internet
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R)
Summary
This bill requires any commercial entity for which it is the regular course of business to publish or distribute in the State a website in which at least 33% of the material published is harmful to minors, as defined in the bill, to verify that any person attempting to access the material is at least 18 years old. After verification, the commercial entity is prohibited from retaining any identifying information of the individual. The bill does not apply to bona fide news or public interest broadcasts or other media and will not affect the rights of a news-gathering organization. The Attorney General must enforce provisions of the bill. If the Attorney General believes that a violation occurred and an action is in the public interest, the Attorney General can commence an action. If the court finds that a violation occurred, the court can grant relief. Civil penalty awards are described in the bill. This bill requires any commercial entity for which it is the regular course of business to publish or distribute in the State a website in which at least 33% of the material published is harmful to minors, as defined in the bill, to verify that any person attempting to access the material is at least 18 years old. After verification, the commercial entity is prohibited from retaining any identifying information of the individual. A commercial entity required to verify under the provisions of this bill is required to display on its website and certain advertisements for the website, a notice warning of the dangers of pornography and a notice promoting a free helpline for those facing mental health or substance use disorders. The specific language required for the notices are included in the bill. The bill does not apply to bona fide news or public interest broadcasts or other media and will not affect the rights of a news-gathering organization. The Attorney General must enforce provisions of the bill. If the Attorney General believes that a violation occurred and an action is in the public interest, the Attorney General can commence an action. If the court finds that a violation occurred, the court can grant relief. Civil penalty awards are described in the bill. This bill is similar to HB 1839; HB 3015 (2026); and HB 236 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/17/2026
H - Superseded by HB 1839

HB2923 Establishes the "Homestead Improvement Property Tax Relief Act" exempting qualifying improvements to a homestead from real property taxation
Sponsor Rep. Carolyn Caton (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Tax Reform by a vote of 5 to 3. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2923. This bill establishes the "Homestead Improvement Property Tax Relief Act". For each year of the exemption period established in the bill, the improvement value of a qualifying improvement to a homestead property must be exempt from real property taxation, not to exceed $75,000 in true value in money for any one homestead property. This exemption must not apply to the pre-improvement base value of the dwelling or the true value in money of the land. To be eligible for the exemption, the property must be considered homestead property by the start date of construction of the qualifying improvement and on January 1st of each tax year the exemption is claimed. Additionally, the owner of the homestead property must file the necessary documentation. The owner must file the Homestead Improvement Exemption intent form with the assessor prior to the issuance of a building permit or within 60 days after the start of construction, if no permit is required. The assessor must review the intent form and notify the owner in writing of their approval or denial for the exemption based on the intent form. The owner must submit a Homestead Improvement Exemption form and supporting documentation to the assessor within 180 days after completion of the improvement. Exemption denials must only occur if there is inadequate documentation or the form shows the estimated cost of the improvement is $7,500 or less. The exemption for qualifying improvements must attach to the homestead property, and it must apply for four consecutive tax years as long as: (1) The property remains a qualifying homestead property on January 1st of each year; (2) The qualifying improvement is not destroyed or removed (except by a catastrophic event); or (3) The owner does not provide voluntary written relinquishment of the exemption. If such homestead property is damaged or destroyed by a catastrophic event, the true value in money of the improvements from before the catastrophic event must continue to be used as the pre-improvement base value during the tax year such event occurred. If the owner replaces, reconstructs, or repairs the damaged dwelling on the same parcel of land within three years of the event, such replacements, reconstruction, or repairs must be treated as a qualifying improvement. The value of this improvement, not to exceed $75,000 for an insured dwelling or $200,000 for an uninsured dwelling, must be exempt for the four- year exemption period. To determine the improvement value, the assessor must follow the procedures provided in the bill. The State Tax Commission must adopt rules, regulations, procedures, and standard forms that are necessary to implement the provisions of this exemption. This homestead improvement exemption must be in addition to other homestead, senior citizen, disability, or property tax relief programs. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that new assessments after home improvements often cause the tax liability to be higher than the actual cost of the improvement, which disincentivize homeowners from making repairs or improving their homes. Those in support of the bill say this bill relieves homeowners from paying this increased property tax liability for renovations for a period of time. Supporters state that Jackson County has had some issues with property taxes and the definition of "new construction", and this bill helps to alleviate some the ambiguity about what counts as "new construction". Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Caton; and Sean Smith. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/09/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Tax Reform

HB2929 Establishes provisions when a district that is not maintaining a high school through twelfth grade shall be provided the rate of tuition for the next school year
Sponsor Rep. Mazzie Christensen (R)
Summary
This bill requires that the rate of tuition charged by a K-12 district to a district that does not maintain a high school and elects to send students to the K-12 district be provided to the sending district before March 1st for the next school year. If the rate of tuition is not provided, the current rate applies.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2930 Requires students to provide proof of income when renewing an empowerment scholarship account
Sponsor Rep. Stephanie Hein (D)
Summary
Currently, Missouri Empowerment Scholarship accounts are renewable on an annual basis and previously eligible students are automatically eligible. This bill requires proof that the student meets the income standard not to exceed 300% of the free and reduced price lunch income threshold.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2933 Modifies and establishes provisions relating to the operation of school districts
Sponsor Rep. Brad Christ (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on General Laws by a vote of 11 to 3. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 2933. The bill requires that beginning in the 2027-28 school year, school districts, charter schools, and publicly contracted private providers stop using seclusion on students as a form of punishment. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must update the model policy to incorporate the definition of seclusion and prohibit the confinement of a student in any room other than a classroom or sensory room. This bill provides a withdrawal process for any school district that is part of a special school district. The bill requires that the school board of the school district that wants to withdraw approve a resolution for a public vote to withdrawal and if so desired impose an additional levy to provide for services that the special school district has provided. Such proposed levy must not exceed the withdrawing school district's proportion of levy paid to the special school district. The bill provides sample ballot language and the process for notification of the local election authority. If the majority at the next available day for school district elections vote to withdraw, the school board must notify the State Board of Education and the school board of the special school district and, beginning on July 1st of the second school year following the vote, the school district will no longer be included in the special school district. The special school district tax levy concludes June 30th of the school year before the withdrawal takes effect. This bill requires that the county collector prorate the taxes imposed on each item or parcel of property so as to collect the proportional share for the school district and the special school district. The adjusted levy approved by voters will be used for special education, vocational education, and technical education programs and services. Additionally, the withdrawing school district must return property, facilities, equipment, and other assets and assume proportional bonded indebtedness. If a majority of the vote is to remain within the special school district the question to withdraw may not be considered again for 12 months. The State Board of Education will appoint a person to supervise the disposition of property and indebtedness and has rulemaking authority. Any student receiving special education at a school operated by the special school district at the time of a withdrawal will be allowed to continue receiving such services as long as the student remains otherwise eligible to receive the services at said school. The district withdrawing will be responsible for the cost of such services. A tenured teacher who is moving from a special school district as a result of withdrawal shall retain tenure status but will not be guaranteed to retain their salary. This bill does not apply to Pemiscot County. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the intention of this bill is not to eliminate the special school district. This is about students, not institutions. There is a lot of support from both parents and school districts. Reform is needed; the lack of collaboration between a special school district and a school district restricts flexibility. Local priorities can't be met when the special school district doesn't share the same priorities. The special school district may have been created with good intent, but the structure has failed to deliver in practice. Local districts should have options. The special school district only needs students to maintain funding and there is no motivation to innovate. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Christ; Michelle Yepez; Diane Dragan; Tara Sparks, Lindbergh Schools; and Jennifer Miller. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the special school district was designed as a county-wide partnership. It provides specialized expertise to schools within the local districts. It opens doors to teach in ways that wouldn't otherwise be possible. The special school district isn't a redundancy, it is a lifeline. This bill will create fragmentation within our schools. This decision should be made by the county, not the State. Families of special needs students do not have the luxury to wait and see what happens. If pooled resources start to deplete, every district will leave the special school district. The special school district is not a luxury, it is often the only option for certain students. Testifying in person against the bill were Missouri National Education Association; Tamico Jones; John Henderson; Paul Wegmann; Erin Taylor-Stone; Areeb Hasan; Sergei Marchenko; Krissy Wegmann; Julie Kauffman; Dr. Tim Dilg; and Kevin Andert, Special School District of St. Louis County. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the cost will create a bigger tax levy. Property taxes will have to increase to cover the costs. The special school district has the ability to service special needs students. This will potentially have a large fiscal impact and will require more full-time employees. This bill has the potential to be a win-win. Testifying in person on the bill was Arnie Dienoff. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/21/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB2940 Modifies provisions relating to leaves of absence for military service
Sponsor Rep. Will Jobe (D)
Summary
Currently, all officers and employees of this state, or of any department or agency thereof, or of any county, municipality, school district, or other political subdivision, and all other public employees of this state who are or may become members of the National Guard or of any reserve component of the Armed Forces of the United States, are entitled to leave of absence from their respective duties, without loss of time, pay, regular leave, impairment of efficiency rating, or of any other rights or benefits, to which otherwise entitled, for all periods of military services during which they are engaged in the performance of duty or training in the service of this state at the call of the Governor and as ordered by the Adjutant General without regard to length of time, and for all periods of military services during which they are engaged in the performance of duty in the service of the United States under competent orders for a period not to exceed a total of 120 hours in any Federal fiscal year. This bill increases the amount of time from 120 hours to 38 working days. This bill also prevents the loss of position, seniority, accumulated leave, impairment of performance appraisal, pay status, work schedule including shift, working days and days off assigned to volunteer firefighters who are also on leave for military duties.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/04/2026
H - Superseded by HB 3083

HB2942 Adds requirements for providing public school financial information to the public
Sponsor Rep. Mike Jones (R)
Summary
Currently, school districts and charter schools maintain a searchable expenditures and revenue database with income, expenditures, and disbursements. This bill expands the components for such database beginning in the 2027-28 school year. Additional components outlined in the bill include: (1) A complete list of administrative positions including compensation, job description, and primary duties; (2) Active contracts with all vendors, consultants, nonprofit entities, or outside organizations as detailed; (3) The range of salaries for all teachers with the number of teachers receiving each salary; and (4) Detailed expenditure reporting as outlined. The bill requires annual posting of a one-page budget summary on the district or charter school website. The budget summary will also be distributed monthly to board members. The bill details components of the summary including a per-pupil expenditure for the current year and the two prior years. A detailed calculation for per-pupil expenditures is provided in the bill and schools are required to annually publish on the school web page and provide to the board a list of unencumbered carryover cash balances for each maintained fund. Currently, financial data for schools is updated quarterly; the bill requires updates on a monthly basis and in an open- structured, machine-readable format. The bill provides a penalty provision for failure to comply including notification to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, required corrective action, and withholding of administrative funds.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2946 Reduces the assessment percentage of tangible personal property over a period of years
Sponsor Rep. Richard West (R)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, the percentage of the true value in money at which personal property is assessed will be reduced over a period of three years until it will be assessed at 0.01% of its true value in money. This bill is similar to HB 2329 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2964 Changes the dates upon which property taxes are due and delinquent
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
This bill changes the dates property taxes are billed and due. Currently, property taxes are billed at least 30 days prior to the delinquent date, are due on December 31st of each year, and are considered delinquent if they are delivered on or after January 1st. This bill moves the billing date to the end of February, the date taxes are due to the end of March, and the date the taxes are delinquent to April 1st.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/04/2026

HB2965 Requires the department of elementary and secondary education to develop a curriculum on Black history and Black literature to be used by school districts
Sponsor Rep. LaKeySha Bosley (D)
Summary
Starting in the 2026-27 school year, this bill requires each school district to require after completion of grade nine that students complete one unit of Black history and one unit of Black literature before receiving a diploma. The State Board of Education must convene a work group and develop academic performance standards for the required courses and provide a model curriculum to districts. This bill is similar to HB 2456 (2024) and to HB 259 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/08/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB2973 Modifies guidelines for student participation in athletic contests organized by sex
Sponsor Rep. Lisa Durnell (R)
Summary
Currently, schools are only allowed to let a student compete in an athletics competition designated for the biological sex of the student, as stated on the student's official birth certificate. Except, female students can participate in competitions designated for male students if there is no corresponding athletics competition designed for female students available. This provision is set to expire on August 28th, 2027. The bill repeals the expiration date. This bill also includes requirements for public school shower rooms, locker rooms, and restrooms to be for students of the same biological sex. Alternative accommodations can be provided for students who assert, with written consent from a parent or guardian, to school officials that such student's gender is different from their biological sex. This bill is similar to HB 1354 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2975 Modifies provisions relating to the calculation of income tax, establishing new progressive personal income brackets and repealing income tax subtractions for certain capital gains, with a referendum clause
Sponsor Rep. Mark Boyko (D)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill revises the resident individual state income tax table by changing the tax brackets of the Missouri taxable income and their corresponding tax rates, as specified in the bill. Beginning in 2028, these brackets of Missouri taxable income must be annually adjusted for inflation using the same measurement and rate used by the Social Security Administration to calculate the percentage increase of the Social Security benefit cost-of-living adjustment. The Director of the Department of Revenue must publish these adjusted brackets each year. Currently, there are automatic resident individual state income tax rate reductions that reduce the top rate of tax when triggered by reaching certain net general revenue amounts. The bill eliminates these automatic reductions. This bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, there must be no tax on taxable income of less than or equal to $2000. Currently, 100% of all income reported as capital gains by certain individuals, 100% of all income reported as capital gains by certain business entities, and a portion of capital gains on the sale or exchange of specie are exempt from Missouri's state income tax. This bill provides an end date for these exemptions. All income reported as capital gains by certain individuals, all income reported as capital gains by certain business entities, and the portion of capital gains on the sale or exchange of specie previously exempted from state income tax will no longer be exempt from the Missouri state income tax after December 31, 2026. The bill has a referendum clause. This bill is similar to HB 2111 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/23/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Special Committee on Urban Issues

HB2978 Limits the use of technology for student learning practices in elementary schools
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
This bill provides definitions for "digital instruction", "instructional technology" and beginning in the 2027-28 school year, limits the use of digital instruction for students in grades Kindergarten through five to not exceed 45 minutes per day. The bill requires that schools limit the use of instructional technology in primary instruction for reading, mathematics, handwriting or cursive writings, science lessons that include demonstrations or manipulatives, and social studies. This bill requires that 70% of assignments be completed using paper and pencil and that cursive writing be mandatory for students in grades two through five. Specific details on cursive instruction requirements for grades two through five are specified and the bill requires that students be able to read and write cursive by end of the fifth grade. The bill provides for exceptions to the limit on technology including for special-education needs, assistive technology required for student access, and teacher-directed demonstrations. Schools may not assign homework that uses instructional technology, require that technology devices be transported from school to the home, use technology for classroom management, behavior tracking, or entertainment, replace library time with digital reading labs, or cursive handwriting instruction with typing courses. The bill outlines required annual reporting for school districts that includes average daily student device-use minutes, listing of all software and digital platforms, and verification of textbooks, manipulative use, and compliance with cursive instruction requirements as provided in the bill. Districts are instructed to adopt and publish the board policy relating to the use of technology supports on the district website. This bill is similar to HB 2230 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/18/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2230

HB2981 Authorizes the "Missouri Homestead Preservation Act"
Sponsor Rep. Michael Burton (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Homestead Preservation Act", which provides a tax credit for eligible senior citizens and disabled individuals, as defined in the bill. Eligibility for the Homestead Tax Credit is also dependent upon the taxpayer's payment in full for any individual property taxes for the three most recent tax years. Each eligible taxpayer can submit an application for the tax credit to the Department of Revenue (DOR). Upon receipt of the application, DOR will verify the applicant's eligibility and calculate the taxes. The Director of DOR will then provide a list of eligible applicants to all county assessors. The county assessors must then provide DOR with a list of verified eligible taxpayers who made improvements to their property. If the dollar amount of the assessed value of the improvements totals more than 5% of the assessed value from the most recent prior tax year, the eligible owners will be disqualified from receiving the credit in the current tax year. A limitation is placed on the current homestead exemption and will be based on the increase in taxes from two years prior to the application of the tax credit to the year immediately prior to the application. If in the most recent prior tax year the property taxes on any parcel of subclass (1) real property increases by more than the homestead exemption limit, any eligible owner of the property will receive a homestead exemption credit to be applied toward the current tax year property taxes to offset the prior year increase in taxes that exceeds the homestead exemption limit. The Director of DOR will calculate the level of appropriation necessary to set the homestead exemption limit for the homesteads of all verified eligible owners at 5% when based on a year of general reassessment, or at 2.5% when based on a year without general reassessment. In the event that an eligible owner dies or transfers ownership of the property after the homestead exemption limit has been set in any given year, the credit is void and any corresponding moneys will lapse to the State to be credited to the General Revenue Fund. The provisions of this bill will sunset six years after the effective date, unless reauthorized by the General Assembly. This bill is similar to HB 1544 (2025) and HB 842 (2023).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB2989 Modifies provisions relating to gaming
Sponsor Rep. Bill Hardwick (R)
Summary
HCS HB 2989 -- GAMING (Hardwick) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Emerging Issues ILLEGAL GAMING (Sections 27.108, RSMo.) This bill establishes the "Illegal Gaming Enforcement Fund", which will consist of a portion of moneys generated from an administrative fee imposed on video lottery terminals. Moneys in the Fund will be used by the Attorney General, prosecutors, and law enforcement to investigate, enforce, charge, and prosecute illegal gaming in this state. INVESTIGATION OF VIOLATIONS (Section 43.375) This bill gives the Missouri State Highway Patrol (Highway Patrol) authority to investigate any criminal violations regarding the provisions of this bill, as specified in the bill. The bill also creates the "Missouri State Highway Patrol Gambling Crimes Investigation Fund", which is to be utilized for certain purposes, as specified in the bill. DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY COMMUNITY SUPPORT FUND (Section 191.250) This bill creates the "Developmental Disability Community Support Fund" which will provide funding for the ongoing learning, education, and support of individuals with developmental disabilities. Moneys in the Fund must be distributed according the provisions in the bill. VIDEO LOTTERY GAMING (Sections 313.425 to 313.445) This bill establishes the "Missouri Video Lottery Regulatory Act", which will provide additional funding for Missouri education programs and additional resources for Missouri municipalities and counties. This bill requires the State Lottery Commission to implement a system of video lottery game terminals and to issue licenses to video lottery game manufacturers, distributors, operators, handlers, and retailers. The Commission must not allow a single vendor or licensee to be responsible for implementing the program. Video lottery game terminals must be connected to a central control system developed or procured by the Commission. No video lottery game terminal will be placed in operation without first being connected to the centralized control system, and the terminal must remain connected at all times. Video lottery game terminals must meet all applicable standards, as specified in the bill. No device that was previously determined to be an illegal gambling machine by the Commission will be licensed as a video lottery game terminal. The Commission must impose a non-refundable application fee, such fees varying, depending on the type of application, and must be distributed as specified in the bill. The initial license will be for a period of one year. Thereafter, the license renewal period will be four years with the applicable license renewal fee paid for each year the license is renewed, as specified in the bill. In addition to the license fees, video lottery game operators must pay the Department of Revenue an annual non-refundable administrative fee of $1,250 for each video lottery game terminal placed in service. The administrative fee will be equally divided and paid by the video lottery game operator and the video lottery game retailer. The Department will remit $200 to the Commission, and the remaining amount will be remitted to the Illegal Gaming Enforcement Fund, as specified in the bill. A license will not be issued to any person who has been convicted of a felony or of a crime involving illegal gambling. Video lottery game operators and video lottery game retailers must enter into a use agreement for the placement of video lottery game terminals, as specified in the bill. The agreement must specify an equal division of net terminal income after adjustments for taxes and administrative fees are made. Video lottery game operators and video lottery game retailers are prohibited from offering anything of value other than the percentage of adjusted gross receipts for the placement of video lottery terminals. All licensees will remain subject to all income, property, sales, and use taxes. A political subdivision can levy a fee upon a video lottery game retailer of $250. Such fee will be divided equally between the video lottery game retailer and the video lottery game operator, provided that all revenue generated be deposited into the General Revenue Fund of the political subdivision. Video lottery game operators will pay winning tickets using a video lottery game ticket redemption terminal, which must be located within the video lottery game retailer's establishment in direct proximity of where the video lottery games are offered. Unredeemed video lottery game tickets expire after 180 days of issue. Any person that has been self-excluded from video lottery game play is guilty of trespassing in the first degree if such person enters a designated Video Lottery Gaming Area, as defined by the Commission. The price of video lottery game terminal credits will be determined by the Commission, and the maximum wager played per video lottery game must not exceed $4. Notwithstanding current law regarding state or local sales tax, any cash award for the maximum wager played on any individual lottery game cannot exceed $1,199 or no more than $1 less than the minimum amount allowable by Federal law before tax withholding is required. Each Operator must not operate more than eight terminals at any one video lottery game retailer location. A political subdivision can further restrict the number of video lottery game terminals at each retail business to five terminals, provided that the restrictions do not apply to high volume truck stops. A person under the age of 21 cannot play video lottery games and the retailer is responsible for preventing anyone under age from playing. Video lottery game operators must have a video surveillance system within the immediate area of the retailer's establishment where video lottery game terminals are located and must maintain the footage for 30 days. The video operator must also post a warning sign that gambling can be addictive and a sign with the problem gambling helpline in red lettering at least one inch high on a white background, as specified in the bill. Video lottery game operators must pay to the Commission 31% of the video lottery game adjusted gross gaming revenue. The Commission will retain an amount necessary to cover administrative expenses, and the remainder will be appropriated equally to public elementary and secondary education and public institutions of higher education, with 20% of such funds to be appropriated to the newly created "Public Elementary and Secondary School Construction and Rehabilitation Grant Fund", as specified in the bill. Video lottery game operators must pay to the Department of Revenue an additional "municipality and county administration tax", as defined in the bill, of 3% of the video lottery game adjusted gross gaming revenue. The Department will distribute the funds to the cities and counties where the video lottery gaming terminals are located. The Commission may require fingerprint submissions as part of the application process of licensing, as specified in the bill. The Commission must adopt rules for the implementation of video lottery terminals, including a provision that a distinct area of the business or building that is not accessible to anyone under the age of 21. The Commission must procure a centralized computer system no later than 90 days following the effective date of this bill, and establish start and operational dates no later than 365 days following the effective date of the bill. Participation in the state lottery will not be construed to be a lottery or gift enterprise in violation of Article III, Section 39 of the Constitution of Missouri. This bill allows any municipality or county to adopt an ordinance prohibiting video lottery game terminals within 120 days after the effective date of the Act and the Commission must be notified within seven days of the passage of the ordinance. If a municipality or county later passes an ordinance allowing video lottery game terminals, it is not allowed to adopt any subsequent ordinance regarding the prohibition of video lottery terminals for 10 consecutive years. A municipality may then only pass an ordinance to prohibit video lottery game terminals no sooner than five years. An applicant for licensure must not be denied a license because of the applicant's operation, handling, leasing, licensing, servicing, or placing of machines or devices. However, the applicant must attest that the video lottery game retailer does not own or possess any illegal gambling devices. This bill also preempts local jurisdictions that enact or enforce a law or regulation on taxes, fees, or conduct in the use of video lottery games. However, nothing will prevent a political subdivision from prohibiting the hours of operation during which video lottery game terminals may be used for game play between 1:30 a.m. and 6:00 a.m.. This bill requires the Commission to prescribe an application form for licensure, which includes certain information, as specified in the bill. The Commission must require every licensee to post a bond, a bonding fee, or a letter of credit in an amount determined by the Commission. Licenses granted by the Commission are nontransferable. The Commission must revoke a license upon certain findings, as specified in the bill. A person who knowingly makes a false statement on an application is guilty of a class A misdemeanor. A licensee will be subject to penalties, suspension, or revocation of a license for an act that is injurious to public health or welfare. The types of acts or omissions committed by the licensee that may be grounds for discipline are specified in the bill. The Commission may also refuse to issue a license. The applicant or licensee must be notified in writing by the Commission with the reasons for the refusal or discipline. The applicant or licensee has 30 days to file a request for a hearing with the administration hearing commission. The Commission can file a complaint with the administrative hearing commission against any applicant or holder of a license or any person who has failed to renew or surrender their license. If the administrative hearing commission finds that the grounds for disciplinary action are met, the Commission will determine the disciplinary action, as specified in the bill. The Commission will have the power and authority to adopt and enforce certain rules and regulations to regulate video lottery games, as specified in the bill. The provisions found within Sections 313.425 to 313.445, and 572.020, 572.070, and 572.100 are non-severable, whereby an individual section that is subsequently found to be invalid will mean that the remaining provisions are also deemed to be invalid. EXCURSION GAMBLING BOAT ADMISSION FEE (Sections 313.805 to 313.835) Currently, the commission has jurisdiction over excursion gambling boats to enforce certain rules and regulations. This bill adds the power to annually adjust admission fees imposed on excursion gambling boats for inflation. Currently, excursion gambling boats must pay the Commission a $2.00 admission fee for each person embarking on such a boat, and the Commission distributes those fees according to existing law. This bill requires that an admission fee of $2.00 be assessed every two hours for each person who is present within the gambling area of the excursion boat, and annual adjustments to those fees, are specified in the bill. Distribution of the admission fees are described in the bill, including a portion of the fees to be remitted to the Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Revolving Fund which will contract with the charitable organization for the construction of a facility for the acquisition and preservation of artifacts related to Missouri's riverboat heritage. The bill also states that all present and future forms of remote wagering on excursion boats will require certain access fees, as specified in the bill. CRIMINAL PROVISIONS FOR GAMBLING (Sections 572.010 to 572.100) The bill modifies the definition of "advance gambling activity" by stating that the owning, operating, supplying, or servicing of video lottery game terminals under the provisions described above does not constitute advancing gambling activity. This bill modifies the definition of "contest of chance" by stating that the outcome of a gambling contest is determined by any element of chance. The bill modifies the definition of "gambling" by stating that gambling does not include any licensed activity or persons participating in such licensed activity, licensed video lottery game terminals, or video lottery games. This bill repeals the current definition of "gambling device". The bill modifies the definition of "slot machine", as specified in the bill, including the provision that a slot machine or gambling device does not include licensed video lottery game terminals or video lottery games. Currently, if a person commits the offense of gambling, he or she is guilty of a Class C misdemeanor. This bill changes the offense to a Class A misdemeanor. The provisions found within Sections 313.425 to 313.445 are non- severable, whereby an individual Section that is subsequently found to be unconstitutional must mean that the remaining provisions are similarly held to be invalid. Currently, a person commits the offense of possession of a gambling device if the person makes certain use of a slot machine. This bill adds the use of a gambling device to these provisions. Any video lottery game operator or video lottery game retailer with a gambling device currently in use or a gambling device that would be determined to be illegal after the passage of this bill may continue to operate such devices before August 28, 2027, by submitting to the Commission certain financial records, as described in the bill. Any video lottery game operator or video lottery game retailer can elect to remove any gambling device from the premises; any such removed gambling device will not be replaced. The provisions found within Sections 313.425 to 313.445 are non- severable from each other and Sections 572.020, 572.070, and 572.100; therefore, if an individual section is subsequently found to be unconstitutional, the remaining provisions are similarly held to be invalid. The provisions in Sections 572.020, 572.070, and 572.100 must become effective on August 28, 2027. Currently, the state preempts any local jurisdiction in the criminalization of gambling. This bill states that the term "gambling" does not include the licensed activities and provisions under Sections 313.425 to 313.437. The Commission will have concurrent authority and jurisdiction to investigate and enforce violations of this bill and seek prosecution of these criminal violations. This bill is similar to SB 862 (2026).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/06/2026
S - Voted Do Not Pass - Senate-Select Committee on Gaming

HB3000 Modifies procedure for requesting audits of political subdivisions
Sponsor Rep. Chad Perkins (R)
Summary
HB 3000 -- AUDITS OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS (Perkins) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS (Section 29.230) Currently, the number of signatures needed for a petition requesting the State Auditor to audit a political subdivision is determined based on the number of qualified voters of the political subdivision that cast votes in the last gubernatorial election prior to the filing of the petition. This bill requires the number of signatures needed to be determined based on the number of qualified voters of the political subdivision that cast votes in the last gubernatorial election prior to the requesting of the petition. FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICTS (Section 321.295) This bill allows the board of directors of a fire protection district to distribute surplus or unneeded supplies or property to volunteer fire protection associations, to other fire protection districts, to fire departments, to eligible donees for the federal surplus property program, and to nonprofit organizations and public service corporations that provide training to fire departments, EMTs, or police officers. The bill also allows these boards to sell certain surplus or unneeded supplies or property to the general public. The board must obtain certain information detailed in the bill for items with a value of $500 or less. All items with a value over $500 will be sold by public auction or sealed bid. Donations must not be made to board members, officers, or employees of the fire protection district, or their relatives, or an entity of which any such person is a board member. Sales to the same individuals must not be made except by an online auction on a platform approved by the Office of Administration. The bill allows the board of directors of a fire protection district to conduct or authorize an audit of any transfer, donation, or sale of surplus or unneeded property made by the district. Such audit can include reviewing record, receipts, and documentation required to be maintained under the bill to ensure compliance with applicable laws, regulations, and policies of the district. The results of any audit must be made available to the governing body of the fire protection district. This bill is similar to SB 644 (2025).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

HB3001 Establishes and modifies provisions relating to school districts
Sponsor Rep. Chad Perkins (R)
Summary
Currently, membership dues may be deducted from the compensation of employees that request such deduction. This bill prohibits school districts from deducting or collecting dues, fees, or contributions on behalf of a professional association or political fund. The bill defines "professional association" as a lawful association that is composed of school district employees and exists for the purpose of dealing with school district employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or other terms and conditions of employment. This bill allows school district employees to join or terminate membership in professional associations at any time and prohibits such associations from limiting when an employee may join or terminate their membership.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3005 Establishes provisions relating to the reconsideration of materials in a public library or public school library
Sponsor Rep. Doyle Justus (R)
Summary
HCS HB 3005 -- RECONSIDERATION OF MATERIALS IN LIBRARIES (Justus) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Emerging Issues This bill establishes provisions relating to the reconsideration of materials in a public library or public school library. The bill defines "digital library material" as material including, but not limited to, digital audiobooks, electronic journals, electronic magazines, and other resources that are directly accessible through the public library or school library database, but excluding any online content that is available outside of the public library or school library database or platform. This bill defines "library material" as any resource in print or non-print format, including, but not limited to, books, magazines, microfiche, microfilm, slides, exhibits, and other materials that are found in a public library or school library. The bill defines "reconsideration" as a process in which library personnel, public schools, school districts, or library governing bodies review materials in a public library or school library due to a formal complaint filed by a member of the community. The outcome of this reconsideration may include relocating or removing library materials or removing or restricting access to digital library materials. This bill requires all public libraries and public school libraries to establish a policy outlining the process for library materials and digital library materials to undergo reconsideration based on a complaint made about library materials or digital library materials from a member of the community. The policy must be made publicly available as provided in the bill. A public library or school library will remove library materials from its permanent collection, relocate library materials within its collection, or remove or restrict access to digital library materials within its collection only if the materials have been reviewed in accordance with an established policy for the reconsideration of library materials and digital library materials that comply with the requirements of the bill. To request reconsideration of library materials or digital library materials, the individual making the request must sign an affidavit affirming that: the individual has read or consumed the entirety of the challenged material; and the individual resides in the taxing district of the public library in which the request is made or the school district in which the request is made. Each public library or school library must develop an appeals process for the reconsideration policy that outlines a process for appealing a decision made regarding the removal of library materials or digital library materials, as specified in the bill. Digital library resources will not track or monitor the access of library materials or digital library materials by individual users, especially minors, including any tracking or monitoring to personalize user experiences. An individual who is an employee or volunteer of a public library or school library must not be subject to termination, demotion, discipline, retaliation, or any other penalty for refusing to remove library materials or digital library materials before the materials have been reviewed in accordance with a policy that complies with the provisions of this bill. This bill is similar to HB 1146 (2025) and SB 159 (2025).
Progress
House: Perfected
Last Action
05/13/2026
H - Dropped from Calendar - Pursuant to House Rule 47

HB3022 Modifies provisions governing Missouri empowerment scholarship accounts
Sponsor Rep. Betsy Fogle (D)
Summary
The bill modifies the current definition for "qualified school" for the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Program to include in the definition that a qualified school cannot discriminate based on religion, sexual orientation or gender identity, or expression. The bill also prohibits otherwise qualified schools that have discriminatory creeds, practices, admission policies, or curriculum from participating in the Program. This bill is similar to HB 1324 (2025) and HB 2893 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3024 Modifies provisions governing mental health efforts in public schools
Sponsor Rep. Tonya Rush (D)
Summary
Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, suicide prevention training and school district policies on youth suicide awareness are required to include training and guidance on using the Columbia Protocol, also known as the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), for suicide risk assessment and training on the mental health virtual tool created under this bill. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, mental health awareness training currently provided in grades nine to 12 must be expanded to include additional age appropriate instruction relating to suicide awareness, tools for identifying potential suicide signs, strategies and protocols for helping students at risk, and other provisions specified in the bill. The bill requires that the current mental health training and awareness instruction be expanded to grades five to eight beginning in the 2027-28 school year; this provision will be known as "Brennan's Law" and such instruction must be included in existing health or physical education curriculum. The bill requires the Department of Mental Health's Children's Office to develop and implement a virtual tool to enhance access to mental health resources. Criteria for the virtual tool include an online resource directory, a method to allow individual screening and assessment relating to mental health, and additional information and support deemed necessary by the Department. This bill is similar to HB 1529 and HB 244 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3025 Requires school districts to provide "period products" at no cost in charter schools and public middle and high schools
Sponsor Rep. Tonya Rush (D)
Summary
Beginning on July 1, 2027, this bill requires every school district and charter school in which 40% or more of the students reside in households with a household income that does not exceed 185% of the most recent poverty guidelines to provide period products in the restrooms for all middle school, junior high, and high school buildings in which there are students in grades six through 12 at no charge to the students. "Period Products" are defined as tampons and sanitary napkins for use in connection with the menstrual cycle. This bill is similar to HB 1435 (2025) and to HB 2370 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3031 Modifies provisions governing certificates of license to teach
Sponsor Rep. Connie Steinmetz (D)
Summary
Currently, the State Board of Education may discipline the holder of a teaching certificate if the holder annuls his or her written contract of employment with the local school district board of education without the board's consent. This bill repeals that authority from the state board.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3035 Modifies provisions relating to motor vehicle assessment valuations
Sponsor Rep. Rodger Reedy (R)
Summary
HCS HB 3035 -- MOTOR VEHICLE ASSESSMENTS (Reedy) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Tax Reform Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill requires the assessor to use 85% of the manufacturer?s suggested retail price (MSRP) for all manufactured motor vehicles to determine the original value in money of all motor vehicle assessment valuations. The bill provides a 12-year depreciation schedule that must be applied to 85% of each MSRP to develop the annual and historical valuation guide for all motor vehicles. Each year, these values must be delivered to each approved software vendor by November 15th and listed for use in the next assessment year by December 15th. If there is no listing available from an approved publication for a particular motor vehicle, the assessor must: (1) Use information or publications that fairly estimate the original value of the motor vehicle; and (2) Apply the depreciation schedule as provided in the bill. The State Tax Commission (STC) must secure an annual appropriation for the guide and the programming needed to allow valuations by the vehicle identification number in all certified mass appraisal software systems. The STC or the State must be responsible for renewals and annual software cost for preparing the data in a usable format for approved software vendors.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
HB3037 Modifies provisions of the "Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program" tax credit
Sponsor Rep. Bill Allen (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 8 to 4. Currently, a taxpayer who makes a qualifying contribution to an educational assistance organization can carry the tax credit forward to any of the taxpayer's four subsequent tax years. For qualifying contributions made on and after January 1, 2028, this bill allows the taxpayer to also carry the tax credit back to the taxpayer's immediately prior tax year. This bill is similar to HB 2158 (2026) and HB 568 (2025). PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill takes into account the fact that a taxpayer's tax liability can vary from year to year, which in turn will allow taxpayers to get the full benefit of their contributions. Supporters further state that many taxpayers decide not to contribute to an organization or cause, even though they qualify under the law, because of the current uncertainty about whether or not the taxpayer would end up owing more in taxes if they did. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Allen; Hillel Anton, Agudath Israel of Missouri; and Jean Evans, American Federation For Children. OPPONENTS: There was not opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB3069 Establishes and modifies provisions relating to school districts
Sponsor Rep. John Simmons (R)
Summary
Currently, membership dues may be deducted from the compensation of employees that request such deduction. This bill prohibits school districts from deducting or collecting dues, fees, or contributions on behalf of a professional association or political fund. The bill defines "professional association" as a lawful association that is composed of school district employees and exists for the purpose of dealing with school district employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, hours of employment, or other terms and conditions of employment. This bill allows school district employees to join or terminate membership in professional associations at any time and prohibits such associations from limiting when an employee may join or terminate their memberships. This bill is similar to HB 3001 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Legislative Review

HB3077 Requires school districts to develop instructional materials regarding the responsible use of social media
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Children and Families by a vote of 13 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3077. This bill requires school districts to develop instructional materials for grades three-12 with at least one unit of responsible social media use and beginning in the 2027-28 school year, to teach such curriculum annually. The bill outlines information the instructional materials must provide including, but not limited to, the permanency and risks of sharing material online; maintaining personal security and identify cyberbullying, predatory behavior, and human trafficking on the internet and social media; and how to report criminal suspicious activity or explicit content encountered on the internet and social media. Districts can also include benefits of social media in the instructional materials and use instructional materials developed by a third-party that is recognized by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. The bill also requires districts to provide resources to staff and families regarding technology use, as provided in the bill. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill has a simple goal of ensuring that safe and secure social media use is taught. Many don't understand the permanency of pictures sent online. Adults in teens' lives need to be taught as well. Many school districts are attempting programs like this prior to legislative implementation. Responsible social media use can be integrated in many different curricula and schools can be creative in how they implement the program, without putting additional burdens on the school system. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Schmidt; Arnie C. Dienoff; Missouri Network Against Child Abuse; Stephanie Embry; and Cara Gerdiman, Kid's Harbor. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Children and Families

HB3078 Provides local property tax credits for certain disabled veterans
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 16 to 1. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3078 and 2672. This bill establishes the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Homestead Tax Credit Act". Beginning January 1, 2027, if adopted by county order, ordinance, or resolution, a county can grant an annual real property tax credit for the primary residence of a disabled veteran that has a market value not to exceed $500,000. The tax credit can only be used for the primary residence and up to five acres. However, if the total market value of the dwelling and surrounding acreage does not exceed $500,000, ownership of additional acreage will not disqualify an owner from eligibility for the tax credit. The county may grant a tax credit for any percentage of the qualified amount that does not exceed 100% of the disabled veteran?s property tax liability. Before January of any year, the governing body of a county may adjust this tax credit percentage for the next general reassessment year by ordinance. If the qualifying disabled veteran passes, this real property tax credit must carry over to the benefit of the surviving spouse, as long as certain conditions are met. This real property tax credit must not reduce assessed valuations and must not be construed as an exemption. If an eligible owner receives this real property tax credit, he or she must no longer be eligible for any other real property tax relief or tax credit relating to the owner?s qualifying residence. For the purpose of calculating property tax levies, the total amount of these real property tax credits must be considered tax revenue actually received by the county or other political subdivision. This bill creates the "Missouri Disabled Veteran Personal Property Tax Credit Act". For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, a county can authorize, by adopting an order, ordinance, or resolution, a personal property tax credit for eligible veterans in an amount equal to the credit percentage applied to the qualified tax liability for each qualified vehicle, up to two vehicles. A veteran is eligible if he or she is a disabled veteran, is a resident of the county adopting an ordinance, owns and maintains a vehicle in this state, and is liable for the payment of personal property taxes on the vehicle. The vehicle must be in the name of the veteran or jointly with the veteran's spouse. The tax credit percentage will be the same percentage as the eligible veteran's disability rating, not to exceed 100%. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill lowers the tax burden for our disabled veterans. This would be an incentive for people to stay and retire in Missouri. A lot of nonprofit organizations are run by disabled veterans and this bill could bring more of those organizations to our state. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Schmidt; Missouri National Guard Assoc.; Blake Leitch, Parmele Disability Advocate; Charles Canady; Charles A Sanders; Abate For Missouri; and Andy Davis. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the legislature is already making cuts to the budget because the State has run out of money. The State cannot afford to do this right now. This could decimate smaller communities. We need this tax revenue to fund police and fire departments. Testifying in person against the bill was Arnie C. Dienoff. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/25/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Veterans and Armed Forces

HB3080 Modifies the historic preservation tax credit
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
HCS HB 3080 -- FACILITIES OF HISTORIC SIGNIFICANCE This bill makes several technical changes to provisions of law relating to facilities of historic significance. The bill contains an emergency clause to provide the provisions of the sections outlined in the bill are intended to and shall be retroactive from the effective date and shall apply to all applications for tax credits received by or approved by the Department at any time on or after August 28, 2024.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/13/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

HB3083 Modifies provisions relating to leaves of absence for military service
Sponsor Rep. Bill Allen (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Veterans and Armed Forces by a vote of 21 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3083 & 2940. Currently, all officers and employees of this state, or of any department or agency thereof, or of any county, municipality, school district, or other political subdivision, and all other public employees of this state who are or may become members of the National Guard or of any reserve component of the Armed Forces of the United States, are entitled to leave of absence from their respective duties, without loss of time, pay, regular leave, impairment of efficiency rating, or of any other rights or benefits, to which otherwise entitled, for all periods of military services during which they are engaged in the performance of duty or training in the service of this state at the call of the Governor and as ordered by the Adjutant General without regard to length of time, and for all periods of military services during which they are engaged in the performance of duty in the service of the United States under competent orders for a period not to exceed a total of 120 hours in any federal fiscal year. This bill increases the amount of time from 120 hours to 39 working days. This bill also prevents the loss of position, seniority, accumulated leave, impairment of performance appraisal, pay status, work schedule including shift, working days and days off assigned to volunteer firefighters who are also on leave for military duties. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this would help our firefighters who works long shifts over weekends. The increased demand placed on service members requires them to train for the mission the United States requires of them. They need to know they will have a job when they return home and that they won't be discriminated against for their service. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Allen; Stephen Davis, Missouri State Council of Fire Fighters ; and Missouri National Guard Association. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/23/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB3115 Modifies provisions governing homestead property tax credits
Sponsor Rep. Dirk Deaton (R)
Summary
This bill requires certain counties to vote, at the municipal election in April of 2028, on whether they would like to prevent the real property tax liability on an eligible taxpayer's homestead from increasing above the liability incurred during the 2024 tax year when calculating the homestead property tax credit. Currently, this bill applies to Jasper and Newton counties.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 02/09/2026, 4:30 PM - House-Ways and Means, HR 5

HB3121 Establishes the "Missouri Free School Meals Program" to reimburse schools for providing free breakfasts and lunches to all students and a tax deduction for persons or entities that donate to a fund that reimburses schools for free school meals
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Douglas (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the "Missouri Free School Meals Program" to reimburse schools for providing free breakfasts and lunches to all students, regardless of whether those students are eligible for free meals under Federal guidelines. For all tax years after January 1, 2027, taxpayers can deduct up to 75% of any donations made to the "Healthy School Meals For All Fund" that is established under the bill. The provisions of the tax deduction program sunset in six years. The bill establishes the "Missouri Free School Meals Program" and provides for voluntary participation in the Program for charter, public, and private schools. School must provide to all students at no cost, up to two meals per school day, with a maximum of one free breakfast and one free lunch. Schools must also seek all sources of Federal funding available. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education must reimburse a school that participates in the Missouri Free School Meals Program in an amount equal to the difference between the Federal reimbursement rate for a free meal and the actual reimbursement received by the school. The Department must submit a report to the General Assembly with participation rates, reduction in food insecurities, and the Program costs and efficiencies. This bill is similar to HB 2613 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3122 Requires charter schools to obtain a certificate of need issued by the State board of education in order to be eligible to operate
Sponsor Rep. Marty Joe Murray (D)
Summary
This bill requires that beginning after August 28th, 2026, charter schools must have a certificate of need issued by the State Board of Education before they are eligible to operate. The requirement will not be required for a renewal or transfer of sponsorship for currently existing charter schools. The bill outlines the certificate of need application process and requires that proposed charter schools demonstrate the following conditions in the school districts where the charter is proposing to operate: there is consumer demand for alternative education options; the school district attendance area contains sufficient "economy of scale" to ensure an adequate supply of teachers and students; and the proposed charter must be likely to alleviate economic and racial inequity, improve academic achievement, reduce student-teacher ratios, result in more efficient education delivery, limit school disruptions, and address family priorities not strictly educational in nature. This bill provides the State Board with approval authority and each application must be approved or disapproved within 120 days.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3123 Modifies provisions relating to age for school entry
Sponsor Rep. Marty Joe Murray (D)
Summary
Currently, students must start attending school at age seven. This bill lowers the attendance age to five. The bill also removes provisions that allow for students 14 years of age or older to be excused if they are employed. The bill provides the board of education for the City of St. Louis school district authority to enforce compulsory attendance requirements and provides jurisdictional authority for attendance enforcement officers to enforce attendance on children five years of age and up.
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/29/2026
H - Read Second Time

HB3125 Authorizes a real property tax exemption for taxpayers sixty-five years of age or older who own a homestead
Sponsor Rep. Deanna Self (R)
Summary
This bill exempts homesteads owned by "eligible homeowners" as defined in the bill, who are at least 65 years of age, from the real property tax assessed on such homesteads.
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/29/2026
H - Read Second Time

HB3133 Increases the cigarette tax from $0.17 per pack of 20 cigarettes to $1.50 per pack, upon voter approval
Sponsor Rep. LaKeySha Bosley (D)
Summary
Currently, a tax is levied upon the sale of cigarettes at an amount equal to 8.5 mills per cigarette, until such time as the General Assembly appropriates an amount equal to 25% of the net Federal Reimbursement Allowance to the Health Initiatives Fund, at which point the tax will be 6.5 mills per cigarette beginning July 1st of the fiscal year immediately after such appropriation. Beginning January 1, 2027, an additional tax will be levied upon the sale of cigarettes at an amount equal to 66.5 mills per cigarette. After a permitted 3% reduction, the revenue generated by this additional tax will be deposited into the State General Revenue Fund. This new tax applies only to cigarette stamps purchased on or after the effective date of the bill. The bill includes a provision related to licensees. This bill contains a referendum clause and will not become effective unless approved by a majority of the qualified voters in the State. This bill is similar to HB 521 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3135 Creates new fire safety requirements for doors in public schools
Sponsor Rep. Adrian Plank (D)
Summary
This bill requires that each public school district ensure that all protective door assemblies in school buildings are inspected every 12 months. ?Protective door assemblies? include firerated doors, doors with panic hardware, electricity controlled egress doors, and doors with special locking systems. The inspections must be completed by a qualified inspector and must follow the NFPA 101 Life Safety Code. Protective door assemblies installed on or after January 1, 2015, must comply with the 2015 edition of the code. Assemblies installed before that date must comply with the edition in effect at the time of installation. If an assembly fails to meet the required standards, the school district must correct the deficiency and obtain a reinspection. The inspector must provide a written report to the district?s board of education indicating whether each assembly: (1) Meets the required standards; (2) Does not meet the required standards; or (3) Does not meet the required standards and presents a significant fire or lifesafety hazard. School districts must maintain records of all inspections and reinspections. Beginning January 1, 2028, the State Fire Marshal must annually review these records. If a district fails to correct a deficiency within the required time, the Marshal may issue a citation, which must be posted on the district?s publicly accessible website. A citation cannot be issued if the district is actively working to correct the deficiency, and no fines may be imposed. The bill allows the use of temporary doorlocking devices approved by the State Fire Marshal. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the State Fire Marshal can promulgate rules to implement the provisions of this bill.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3137 Requires school districts and charter schools to offer students who are at least seventeen years and six months of age the opportunity to register to vote
Sponsor Rep. Tiffany Price (D)
Summary
This bill requires that, at least twice during each school year, school districts and charter schools offer students who are at least 17 1/2 years old the opportunity to register to vote. The first opportunity must occur during school hours on the fourth Tuesday in September. The second opportunity must occur at a later time and must be conducted by the local election authority in whose jurisdiction the school district or charter school is located. The school district or charter school must coordinate with the local election authority to provide the second voter registration activity. The Secretary of State must prepare materials regarding voter registration to be distributed at each voter registration activity. Each school district and charter school must file a report regarding voter registration activities with the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education by December 31 of each year. This bill is similar to SB 963 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3139 Establishes additional requirements for computer science courses in schools
Sponsor Rep. Kem Smith (D)
Summary
This bill adds cybersecurity, social media training, and artificial intelligence to the current definition of "computer science course". The bill requires that, beginning in the 2027-28 school year, the State Board of Education must adopt and implement academic performance standards for a computer science course and that students complete 1/2 unit of academic credit for such course while in high school before the student can graduate. Currently, students can substitute one computer science course for a math, science, or practical arts graduation requirement. The bill requires that the new 1/2 unit of computer science requirement be completed prior to a substitution. This bill is similar to HB 1576 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3141 Modifies provisions governing student attendance data reported for school accreditation processes
Sponsor Rep. Kem Smith (D)
Summary
This bill provides that, beginning in the 2026-27 school year, if a student is suspended, expelled, or unilaterally removed to an interim educational setting for an act of school violence, the student's attendance or enrollment data will not count for the Missouri School Improvement Program for accreditation. This bill is similar to HB 1220 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3142 Modifies and establishes provisions relating to overnight and residential camps
Sponsor Rep. Cameron Parker (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 11 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3142. This bill creates the "TJ and Heaven's 27 Camp Safety Act". This bill requires that a person or organization that establishes, maintains, or operates an overnight camp or residential camp, as those terms are defined in the bill, must obtain a license from the Department of Social Services. The Department will have certain duties to inspect such camps and to promulgate rules that the licensees must follow and will have the authority to deny a license application if the camp is operated in an unsafe or hazardous manner. Licensees must renew their license annually in a manner described in the bill. The Department will not issue a license for a camp if the camp is not in compliance with the provisions of this bill. All employees or volunteers of the camp who 18 years or older must subject themselves to a criminal background check, and each camp must have at least one staff member who is certified in CPR. The bill requires the Department to review camper-to-counselor ratios for camps if applicable, and establish minimum ratios by rule. The Department must investigate each complaint filed about a camp to ensure it is implementing the approved emergency plan. Each summer or day camp must comply with fire, safety, health, and sanitation inspections that may be required. The director of the Department must require a camp operator to establish an emergency plan that: (1) Specifies muster zones to gather in an emergency event requiring evacuation; (2) Establishes procedures for emergency events, as described in the bill; (3) Establishes procedures to identify and account for each camper affected by the emergency event; (4) Establishes procedures to notify and communicate with law enforcement, camp administrative and medical staff, and the parents or legal guardians of each camper; and (5) Designates a camp emergency preparedness coordinator. Additionally, the director must require that a camp operator: (1) Maintain an operable radio capable of providing real-time weather alerts; (2) Install and maintain an emergency warning system; (3) Monitor safety alerts; and (4) Certify compliance with these provisions. An operator is required to annually submit the initial or updated emergency plan to the Department for approval. If it is determined that the submitted plan does not meet minimum standards, the operator must revise and resubmit the plan no later than 45 days after the date the operator receives notice from the Department. If approved, the operator must provide a copy of the plan to the law enforcement agency or county sheriff's office where the camp is located, and the director of the emergency management agency of the county in which the camp is located. The Department will store each emergency plan in a digital database and provide access to the State's emergency management agency. Operators are required to provide the most recent version of a camp's plan to the parent or legal guardian of a participating or prospective camper, to notify the parent or guardian of a camper whether any part of the camp is located in a flood plain, and to ensure that the parent or guardian signs and submits a statement acknowledging receipt of this information. The bill requires, not more than 48 hours after each camp session begins, operators to conduct a mandatory safety orientation. Additionally, at least once per year, camp operators must: (1) Provide each camp staff member and volunteer a copy of the most recent emergency plan; (2) Ensure each staff member and volunteer completes training on the camp's emergency plan; (3) Instruct each staff member and volunteer on the proper procedures to follow in an emergency; and (4) Maintain written records documenting each staff member's and volunteer's completion of the required training. The proper evacuation route described in the emergency plan must be conspicuously posted in each cabin on the camp's premises. A person or organization that makes a materially false statement to obtain or renew a license will be guilty of a Class C misdemeanor for a first offense, and a Class A misdemeanor for any subsequent offenses and assessed a fine for those offenses, as described in the bill. If the Department proposes to deny, suspend, place on probation or revoke a license, the Department must serve notice upon the applicant and allow for a hearing on the matter. If there is a threat of imminent bodily harm to a minor at the camp, the Department must follow certain procedures, as described in the bill. The provisions of this bill will not apply to any camp offered by an institution of higher learning in this state. This bill is similar to HB 1860 (2024); and HB 1292 (2023). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that most parents simply trust that a camp will have an emergency preparedness plan in place, and that the employees of the camp are all trained for such a plan. In Missouri, there is no mandated state licensing for camps, or any mandated inspections or criminal background checks. Supporters further state that deaths that occur at camps are preventable and unnecessary, and that camps should be held to the same standard that is applied to schools and daycare facilities. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Parker; Clarke Baker; Davin Hunt; Matthew Childress; Olga Mister; Arnie Dienoff; Samantha Jones, In Tact; Travone Mister; Olga Mister; and American Camp Association. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that if this bill passes, it could lead to an unintended childcare shortage at a time when many families rely on care for their children throughout the year. Opponents further state that regulating this area of the economy will end up being a tax on church-based camps that already struggle to find funding for summer and day camps. Testifying in person against the bill were Issachar LLC; Missouri Park and Recreation Association; Missouir Park and Recreation Association; Misosuri AfterSchool Network; and Trent Young. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say the provisions of this bill should be administered by the Department of Social Services because that Department already administers similar policies. Testifying in person on the bill were Missouri Families for Home Education; Erin Balleine; and Suzanne McGinnis. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/16/2026
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 04/21/2026, 9:00 AM - House-Rules-Administrative, HR 4

HB3149 Modifies provisions relating to sales taxes for early childhood education services
Sponsor Rep. Brad Christ (R)
Summary
The bill allows the proceeds of any tax imposed by a county or city not within a county for the purposes of establishing an Early Childhood Education Fund to be deposited into such fund in the county or city not within a county. The board of directors established by law must be responsible for the administration and management of such funds. The board of directors must use or disburse the funds in the Early Childhood Education Fund to provide and administer programs that improve the quality, affordability, and access to early childhood development programs for children aged 5 and younger. The funds may also be used for early education, care, and related transportation provided by entities listed in the bill. This bill is similar to SB 20 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3164 Modifies provisions relating to the duties of the state tax commission
Sponsor Rep. Rodger Reedy (R)
Summary
This bill provides that, for the purpose of equalizing the valuation of real property and tangible personal property among counties, the State Tax Commission must use ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass of property is valued below or above its true value in money. A class or subclass of property must be considered below or above its true value in money if the weighted mean ratio is less than 70% or greater than 100%.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3171 Repeals provisions relating to certain penalties for failure to deliver personal property lists
Sponsor Rep. Richard West (R)
Summary
This bill repeals the deadline set for taxpayers? personal property lists and the subsequent penalty provisions for when such lists are not submitted or are submitted after the set deadline.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3174 Establishes provisions relating to emergency responses in schools
Sponsor Rep. Doyle Justus (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Crime and Public Safety by a vote of 15 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3174. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, this bill requires that school districts and charter schools implement a wearable panic alert system, known as "Alyssa's Law". The system will integrate with local public safety, and transmit 911 calls and mobile activations. The bill requires that each school employee be provided with a wearable panic alert device and specifies requirements for the panic alert device including specific notifications relating to emergency devices and communication. Any records, information, photographs, audio and visual presentations, schematic diagrams, surveys, recommendations, or consultations, or portions thereof, relating directly to the physical security or fire safety of a school building or revealing security or fire safety systems held by any emergency response agency is confidential and exempt from the open record request provisions of Chapter 610, RSMo. The bill establishes the "Alyssa Alhadeff Fund" for the purposes of the administration of the provisions of this program. The bill requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to create a list of qualified vendors for the panic alert system. On or before July 1, 2028, this bill requires each school district and charter school to install at least one "master key box", as such term is defined in current law, at each school. Each master key box must be installed at an appropriate location to permit law enforcement officers emergency access to each building and room on school grounds. The school district or charter school will determine the precise location of each master key box after consultation with local law enforcement agencies, and provide local law enforcement agencies with a key or access code that permits access to the contents of the master key box. Each master key box shall contain certain items specified in the bill, such as keys to each building and room on school grounds and accurate maps labeling access points, locations of critical emergency response aids, and the areas around each building. The contents of a master key box and the information contained therein shall not be a public record and shall not be made available for public examination. An employee of a school district or charter school is immune from civil liability for damages arising out of the installation and use of master key boxes unless the employee acted with gross negligence or bad faith. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill establishes "Alyssa?s Law", which allows school employees to wear panic buttons for emergency situations, and the buttons allow mapping and contacting first responders in real time. This would be helpful in situations where there is classroom distress such as behavior or medical emergencies. Several states have enacted similar laws. There are vendors schools can choose from to obtain the panic alert buttons. Alyssa?s mother testified and told the story of how her daughter was killed in a school shooting in Florida eight years ago, mostly because she was not alerted fast enough of the emergency situation. The principle of this is simple and it could save many lives. It would alert first responders with real time accuracy, when every second matters. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Justus; and Lori Alhadeff, Make Our Schools Safe. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/23/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB3179 Modifies provisions for sales tax of children's services
Sponsor Rep. Ashley Aune (D)
Summary
Currently, upon voter approval, the governing body of a county can levy a sales tax for the purpose of providing services to children including counseling, family support, and temporary residential services to persons 19 years of age or younger. This bill requires the governing body to levy the sales tax if approved by voters.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3188 Establishes the Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Act
Sponsor Rep. Melissa Schmidt (R)
Summary
HB 3188 -- WITHDRAWN
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
02/04/2026
H - Withdrawn

HB3201 Requires schools that receive state funds to give students excused absences for attending scheduled elections with their parents
Sponsor Rep. Ken Jamison (D)
Summary
This bill provides that a student enrolled in a school that receives state funds shall not be considered absent for the time the student spends attending a scheduled primary, general, or special election with his or her parent, legal guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to the student. A student may receive only one excused absence during each scheduled election. Upon his or her return to school, the student shall be encouraged by school officials to demonstrate his or her attendance at the election by wearing an official sticker, badge, or other item indicating that he or she attended the election. This bill is similar to SB 962 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3206 Modifies provisions related to the regulation of certain tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, and vapor products
Sponsor Rep. Lane Roberts (R)
Summary
This bill modifies provisions related to the regulation of certain tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, and vapor products. DEFINITIONS -- CIGARETTE TAX (Section 149.011) This bill creates new definitions for the terms "alternative nicotine product", "nicotine analogue", and "vapor product". WHOLESALER LICENSE (Section 149.035) Currently, every wholesaler of cigarettes or tobacco products and every person making a first sale of tobacco products who does not have a wholesaler license must secure such a license from the Department of Revenue. This bill adds alternative nicotine products and vapor products to the list of products for which wholesalers or persons making a first sale of such products must secure a license from the Department. TOBACCO PRODUCTS MANUFACTURER LICENSE (Section 149.036) On or before February 15th of each year, every manufacturer of cigarettes, alternative nicotine products, vapor products, or tobacco products must secure a tobacco products manufacturer license from the Department and pay an annual fee of $1,000. VAPOR PRODUCTS MANUFACTURER LICENSE (Section 149.037) Every manufacturer of vapor products must secure a vapor product manufacturer license from the Department. The application for a license must include certain information, as specified in the bill. The applicant must pay a $100 fee for each type or model of vapor product included on its list of certified products and cannot sell vapor products that have not been certified without first following certain procedures, as specified in the bill. The Director of the Department must maintain a list of all certified vapor products. Beginning September 1, 2026, vapor products not included on the list will not be sold. NONRESIDENT OR FOREIGN MANUFACTURER OF VAPOR PRODUCTS (Section 149.038) Any nonresident manufacturer of vapor products that has not registered as a foreign corporation must appoint an agent to receive process servicing of legal actions before receiving a manufacturer license. The Department will require certain information, notifications, and surety bonds before licensing, as specified in the bill. APPROVED PURCHASES (Section 149.039) Wholesalers and retailers may purchase cigarettes, alternative nicotine products, vapor products, and tobacco products only from manufacturers and wholesalers who have obtained proper licensing. Manufacturers and wholesalers may sell cigarettes, alternative nicotine products, vapor products, and tobacco products only to manufacturers and wholesalers who have obtained proper licensing. Confirmation of valid licensing must be done before the purchase or sale of the products; any such products sold without proper licensing will be considered contraband and may be seized and destroyed. TOBACCO PRODUCTS TAX (Section 149.160) Currently, a tax is levied on the first sale of tobacco products other than cigarettes. Beginning January 1, 2027, this tax will include alternative nicotine products and vapor products. PENALTIES FOR UNLICENSED ENTITIES (Section 149.190) Currently, the Department may conduct an investigation into whether a person not possessing a valid tobacco products license sold tobacco products at retail when such products were not purchased from a licensed wholesaler and the Department will assess appropriate penalties. This provision applies to persons not possessing a valid manufacturer or wholesaler license, tobacco retail license, or any other license required by the Department and who is selling tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, vapor products within the state and to any person who possesses a valid license or licenses and is selling these products at retail within the state. REDUCING TOBACCO USE BY MINORS (Section 407.924) Currently, the Division of Alcohol and Tobacco, within the Department of Public Safety, administers programs to reduce tobacco possession by minors. This bill includes all tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, and vapor products to reduce possession and use by minors. DEFINITIONS -- TOBACCO SALES TO MINORS (Section 407.925) This bill creates a new definition for the term "nicotine analogue" and adds to the existing definition for "vapor product". AGE RESTRICTIONS (Section 407.926) Currently, alternative nicotine and vapor products may be sold only to persons 18 years of age or older and are subject to local and state sales tax but will not otherwise be taxed or regulated as tobacco products. This bill subjects such products to both tax and licensing requirements and ensures that alternative nicotine and vapor products are taxed and regulated as tobacco products. REGULATIONS ON SALES (Section 407.928) Currently, packs of cigarettes may be sold only under certain conditions. This bill includes tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, and vapor products. REGULATION ON ADVERTISING (Section 407.930) This bill states that no person will market, advertise, sell, or cause to be sold a "tobacco substitute", as that term is defined in the bill, that depicts cartoon characters, celebrities, or anything that appeals to minors. Tobacco substitutes may not be sold with entertainment features, games, music, or video, nor anything that contains or is mixed with cannabinoids, alcohol, or other such substances. CRIMINAL PENALTIES (Section 407.931) Currently, any owner of an establishment where tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products are available for sale must not sell, provide, or distribute such products to any minor. This bill states that upon the fourth and any subsequent violations per location within two years, the Division must issue a citation prohibiting the outlet from selling tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products for a five-day period. The owner of the establishment where the products are sold will not be penalized if the owner documents certain items, as specified in the bill. TOBACCO RETAIL LICENSE (Section 407.934) All persons selling, providing, or distributing tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products must apply for a tobacco retail license from the Department. A separate license is required for each retail location and is valid for 12 months before its annual renewal for a fee of $200. An initial inspection of the retail location within 90 days of receipt of the license will be conducted, followed by at least two unannounced inspections. The Department may deny applications for certain reasons, as specified in the bill. Any commissioned law enforcement officer may inspect such products sold by a retailer and must seize any products not in compliance with these provisions.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3208 Modifies provisions relating to certain public school retirement systems boards of trustees
Sponsor Rep. Barry Hovis (R)
Summary
The Board of Trustees for the St. Louis Public School retirement system was expanded to 13 people in 2025. Currently the requirement for passage of a decision by the trustees is six votes. This bill provides that seven members will constitute a quorum for any transaction of business and that actions and decisions of the Board require a majority of votes during any meeting in which a quorum is present.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/03/2026
H - Scheduled for Committee Hearing - 03/04/2026, 4:00 PM - House - Pensions, HR 6

HB3210 Establishes the "Safe Neighborhoods Act"
Sponsor Rep. Dave Hinman (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs by a vote of 9 to 5. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3210. This bill establishes the "Safe Neighborhoods Act". The bill applies to property owners located in a city with more than 100,000 inhabitants. Once per tax year, such property owners can submit claims for compensation if the city in which the property is located adopts a policy or practice of declining to enforce certain kinds of existing laws or ordinances, as provided in the bill, or maintains a public nuisance, and the property owner either incurs documented expenses to mitigate the effects of the policy, practice, or nuisance, or if the "fair market value", as that term is defined in the bill, of the property is reduced by the policy, practice, or ordinance. The amount of compensation to which the owner is entitled will be equal to the documented expenses or the reduction in fair market value of the property. The compensation cannot exceed the amount the owner paid for the prior tax year in primary property taxes to the city. Within 30 days after a property owner submits a claim for compensation, the city must accept the claim and compensate the property owner, or reject the claim. The questions of whether a property owner is entitled to compensation and whether the amount of the claim is reasonable are justiciable questions. A prevailing property owner will be awarded reasonable attorney's fees. A property owner and city are permitted to enter into a knowing and voluntary settlement for an amount less than the property owner's claim. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that rampant homelessness is taking over once-beautiful cities nationwide as governments fail to act. Biohazard pollution, crime, and property damage are rampant. This is a public health risk, and fires, human waste, and violence plague cities. Currently, private businesses have to pay to address the negative outcomes that should be the responsibility of local governments. This bill provides an avenue for property owners to recoup the costs of addressing issues that are not their responsibility. A lot of provisions in the bill are subjective and could be interpreted differently by different people, but the bill has a good goal and addresses a real problem. It needs to be amended to resolve vagueness and more effectively address the problem. This issue exists in O?Fallon and Columbia at least. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hinman; Cicero Action; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/23/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB3213 Expands the definition of special victim to include sports officials at a sporting event
Sponsor Rep. Bob Bromley (R)
Summary
This bill expands the definition of "special victim" under Section 565.002, RSMo, to include sports officials at a sporting event while performing their duties. This bill is similar to HB 1937 (2026) and HB 505 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3222 Requires a school district or charter school to terminate employment if an employee who is being investigated for sexual misconduct attempts to resign
Sponsor Rep. Raychel Proudie (D)
Summary
Currently school employees under investigation for allegations of sexual misconduct may resign before the conclusion of the investigation in lieu of potential termination. This bill eliminates the employee's option to resign and requires schools to terminate any employee who tenders a resignation under these circumstances. The bill clarifies that a termination will not end an investigation and that substantiated findings must be reported.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3228 Establishes provisions providing teachers with immunity if the teacher intervenes in incidents involving violence
Sponsor Rep. Kathy Steinhoff (D)
Summary
This bill provides immunity from civil liability for a teacher, and the school district or charter schools that the teacher works for, who intervenes in a incident involving violence for if the teacher is acting to safeguard himself or herself or a student. The bill requires the teacher to follow procedures and to intervene in good faith in a manner that the teacher reasonably believes is afforded the defense of justification under Chapter 563, RSMo. The bill prevents school districts from the implementation of a policy that prevents teachers from protecting themselves or students. This bill is similar to HB 2913 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/25/2026
H - Superseded by HB 2913

HB3231 Establishes the "Missouri Innovation, Public Safety, and Accountability Act"
Sponsor Rep. Brad Christ (R)
Summary
SS#2 SCS HCS HBs 3231 & 2531 -- MISSOURI INNOVATION, PUBLIC `SAFETY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT MISSOURI DOWNTOWN ECONOMIC STIMULUS ACT (Sections 99.918-99.980) This bill reauthorizes and reenacts the provisions of the "Missouri Downtown Economic Stimulus Act" (MODESA), which previously sunset and no longer permitted new project authorizations under current law. The bill modifies definitions under MODESA. The definition of "central business district" is expanded by removing certain existing eligibility limitations relating to median household income and the age of buildings within the district. The bill also specifies that a municipality’s riverfront may be included within a central business district, including riverfront areas with industrial historical land uses. The definition of "development area" is modified to allow approval of certain development areas after August 28, 2026, while prohibiting newly approved development areas or expanded development areas from being located within one-half mile of another approved area, except in a city not within a county, where the radius may be reduced but not eliminated. The bill provides that a development area may consist of up to three non-contiguous areas, may not exceed 10% of the municipality’s total area, and generally may not include property located within the 100-year flood plain unless protected or floodproofed in accordance with the bill’s provisions. The bill creates new definitions associated with expanded development projects and financing mechanisms. New terms include "expanded development area", "expanded development plan", "expanded development project", "expanded development project area", "expanded development project costs", "municipal residential earnings tax increment", "net-new increment district", "retained jobs", and "state residential income tax increment". These provisions establish a framework allowing certain previously approved downtown projects to expand into adjacent or additional redevelopment areas under modified financing structures. The bill further provides that, when a development project or expanded development project relocates an out-of-state business into Missouri, the state sales tax increment, state income tax increment, economic activity taxes, and other net new revenues generated by the relocated business will be calculated using the full amount of taxes generated by the relocated operations without offsetting prior baseline revenues. The bill shortens the statute of limitations for legal challenges relating to authority contracts, development plans, development areas, development projects, expanded development areas, expanded development plans, and taxes authorized under the Act. Current law allows 90 days to challenge such actions. The bill reduces the limitation period to 30 days following the effective date of the applicable ordinance or resolution. The bill modifies and expands the powers of municipalities and authorities administering downtown redevelopment projects. Municipalities and authorities are authorized to prepare and implement expanded development plans and projects; acquire, transfer, or dispose of property; install or relocate infrastructure; enter into contracts; accept grants and donations; select developers; issue obligations; pledge revenues; and finance expanded development project costs. The bill modifies provisions relating to property acquisition and disposition within development project areas and expanded development project areas. Municipalities and authorities may transfer or lease property for residential, recreational, commercial, industrial, or mixed uses consistent with a development plan or expanded development plan. No new application for a development area, development plan, or development project will be approved after December 31, 2032, and no new application for expanded development projects will be approved after January 1, 2037. The bill revises requirements for development plans and establishes requirements for expanded development plans. Expanded development plans must include legal descriptions of the project area, estimated project costs, financing sources, evidence of financial commitments, relocation assistance plans, infrastructure improvements, and findings relating to blight, conservation, or economic conditions within the area. The bill modifies notice and hearing requirements applicable to development areas, expanded development areas, development plans, and expanded development plans. Public hearings are required prior to approval of certain redevelopment ordinances, and notice must be provided by certified mail to affected taxing districts and certain property owners. Notice of public hearings must also be published once each week for four weeks immediately prior to the hearing. The bill also modifies the application requirements for State supplemental downtown development financing. Applications submitted to the Department of Economic Development must include certifications relating to payments in lieu of taxes, economic activity taxes, municipal residential earnings tax increments, projected State tax increments, and affidavits stating that development would not reasonably occur without the use of other net new revenues. The bill authorizes municipalities, authorities, and political subdivisions to issue obligations to finance development project costs and expanded development project costs. Such obligations are payable solely from pledged revenues and do not constitute general obligations or indebtedness of the State or municipality. The bill also authorizes refunding obligations and permits obligations issued under other statutory authority to be retired using special allocation fund revenues. The bill modifies provisions relating to special allocation funds. Following approval of development financing, payments in lieu of taxes, economic activity taxes, State sales tax increments, State income tax increments, municipal residential earnings tax increments, State residential income tax increments, and other net new revenues may be deposited into a special allocation fund for payment of redevelopment costs and obligations. The bill modifies provisions governing the State Supplemental Downtown Development Fund. The Fund will continue to be administered by the Department of Economic Development, and the Department may use fund monies for reasonable and necessary administrative expenses. The bill also provides that municipalities can not commit or obligate State supplemental disbursements prior to receiving a certificate of approval for the applicable development project or expanded development project. The bill modifies annual reporting requirements for redevelopment projects receiving state assistance. Municipalities must report information relating to project status, public expenditures, jobs created and retained, wage groups, tax revenues, employment levels, and redevelopment progress. Municipalities failing to file required reports may become ineligible for future disbursements from the State Supplemental Downtown Development Fund. The Department of Economic Development must submit an annual report to the Governor and General Assembly by April 30 each year. CAPITAL INVESTMENT TAX CREDIT (Section 620.2012) The bill creates an additional capital investment tax credit component within the Missouri Works program. Beginning January 1, 2027, qualified companies may receive tax credits if the Department of Economic Development approves a benefits proposal and the company makes at least $30 million in new capital investments within two years if located within a certified Missouri Innovation Zone, or at least $50 million if located outside such a zone. Data storage centers are not eligible. The credit may not exceed 2.5% of new capital investment made at the project facility during the three-year period following submission of a notice of intent. Investments made prior to the notice of intent do not qualify. Credits expire if the company fails to satisfy minimum investment requirements within two years. The Department of Economic Development must respond to notices of intent within 30 days by approving, rejecting, or conditionally approving the request. In determining benefits, the Department must consider the necessity of incentives, the number of jobs created or retained, wages, investment size, local incentive participation, financial stability, economic distress, competitiveness of alternative locations, and related economic factors. MISSOURI INNOVATION, PUBLIC SAFETY, AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT (Sections 620.6000-620.6033) The bill further modifies provisions relating to the expiration and continued authorization of the Downtown Economic Stimulus Act in Sections 620.6000 to 620.6033 and will be known as the "Missouri Innovation, Public Safety, and Accountability Act". The provisions will sunset 10 years after the effective date. Existing approvals and benefits may continue for their authorized duration. MISSOURI INNOVATION ZONE (Sections 620.6000, 620.6003 & 620.6006) The bill establishes the Missouri Innovation Zone program. Eligible cities may designate one geographic area as a certified Missouri Innovation Zone for purposes of receiving and administering specified economic development incentives. Participation in the program is voluntary, no city may have more than one certified zone, and a certified Missouri Innovation Zone must be contiguous and may not exceed 10% of the total area of the participating city. The executive branch of the participating city must prepare and submit a master plan to the Department of Economic Development. The master plan must identify zone boundaries, vacant or underutilized properties, infrastructure priorities, public safety strategies, reinvestment plans for net-new revenues, and projected housing, population, and employment impacts. The bill defines "state income tax increment" as up to 50% of the state income tax withheld on behalf of employees in new jobs within the zone. The bill defines "state sales tax increment" as up to 50% of the incremental increase in state sales tax revenue generated within the zone, subject to limitations on certain retail sales unless the Department determines such sales constitute new economic activity. The Department must approve, conditionally approve, or deny complete applications within 45 calendar days. If an application is incomplete, the Department must issue a notice of deficiency within 45 days, and the applicant will have 15 days to cure deficiencies while retaining its position in the application review process. Failure by the Department to issue a determination within the required period may result in deemed approval if statutory requirements are otherwise satisfied. The Department’s review authority is limited to determining whether statutory and regulatory requirements have been satisfied. The Department may issue a conditional designation if local implementation policies remain incomplete, but incentives may not be utilized until certification is finalized. The bill provides that certified Missouri Innovation Zones qualify for several state-administered incentives, including employer retention and reinvestment incentives, employer relocation incentives, office-to-residential conversion incentives, Missouri Opportunity Zone tax deferrals, and Missouri angel investment incentives. Certified zones will also qualify as redevelopment areas for purposes of Chapters 99 and 353, RSMo, allowing the use of local tax increment financing and property tax abatement tools. The bill requires the Department to establish a master scorecard system applicable to office-to-residential conversion projects and certain local redevelopment incentives. The scorecard must contain not less than 100 possible points, establish not fewer than five incentive tiers, and require a minimum eligibility threshold of not less than 50 points. Criteria must include public safety, infrastructure improvements, housing development, vacant property reuse, fiscal impacts, project readiness, and related redevelopment considerations. The bill authorizes the Department to charge application, participation, or administrative fees of up to 2.5% of the tax credits issued under the program. The Missouri Innovation Zone program sunsets 10 years after the effective date and terminates on September 1 of the following calendar year. Existing certifications and benefits may continue for their authorized duration following the sunset. RURAL MISSOURI DEVELOPMENT FUND (Section 620.6009) The bill creates the "Rural Missouri Development Fund". The Fund will be administered by the Department of Economic Development for economic development, housing, workforce development, infrastructure, education, health care, public safety, and community development projects in rural and smaller communities. The bill defines a "contributing city" as a city with a certified Missouri Innovation Zone that also falls within the highest 5% of statewide taxable assessed valuation and agrees to contribute a portion of net-new state sales tax revenues generated within the zone. Each contributing city must annually contribute 10% of the net- new state sales tax revenue retained for its Innovation Zone Public Safety Fund. Local sales taxes, local property taxes, and other local revenues are excluded from the contribution requirement. Receipt of money from the fund does not require a city to establish a Missouri Innovation Zone. The Department may award grants to rural cities, smaller communities, or development organizations applying on behalf of such communities. No more than 20% of annual available funds may be awarded to a single applicant unless unobligated funds remain after the initial award process. MISSOURI INNOVATION ZONE PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (Section 620.6012) The bill creates the "Missouri Innovation Zone Public Safety Fund" for public safety and infrastructure improvements within certified Missouri Innovation Zones. Funds may be used for law enforcement, fire protection, emergency medical services, nuisance abatement, lighting, transportation improvements, sidewalks, infrastructure repairs, and related improvements supporting redevelopment activities within the zone. MISSOURI WORKS PROGRAM (Section 620.6018) The bill creates an employer retention and reinvestment incentive within the Missouri Works program for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027. Qualified companies maintaining retained jobs within a certified Missouri Innovation Zone may receive withholding retention benefits for qualifying reinvestment expenditures and payroll retention activities. To qualify, a company must employ at least three covered employees at the certified zone location. The Department of Economic Development must approve or deny complete applications within 45 calendar days, and failure to issue a determination within the required time period will result in deemed approval if statutory requirements are satisfied. The bill prohibits companies from relocating or transferring operations from another Missouri location into the zone if such relocation materially reduces payroll at the originating location. Payroll used for this incentive may not also be used for the employer relocation incentive. The withholding benefit cannot exceed 3% of the aggregate gross wages paid to new and retained jobs at the certified innovation zone location during a single tax year, and the benefit can be authorized for three to ten years. Tax credits authorized under the incentive are nonrefundable, may be carried forward for up to five tax years, and may not be transferred, sold, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. MISSOURI ONE START PROGRAM (Section 620.2021) The bill creates an employer relocation incentive under the Missouri One Start program for companies creating eligible relocated jobs or new jobs within a certified Missouri Innovation Zone. Qualified companies may receive benefits relating to relocated employees establishing Missouri residency and creating new employment opportunities within the zone. To qualify, a company must create at least three eligible relocated jobs or new jobs within the zone. Eligible relocated employees must receive annual wages of at least $70,000. If an eligible relocated employee fails to maintain the primary residence requirement for 12 consecutive months following relocation, any state tax credit attributable to that employee will be subject to recapture from th eligible qualified company. Tax credits authorized under the incentive are nonrefundable, may be carried forward for up to five tax years, and may not be transferred, sold, assigned, or otherwise conveyed. OFFICE-TO-RESIDENTIAL CONVERSION (Section 620.6024) The bill creates an office-to-residential conversion incentive for redevelopment projects converting eligible office properties into residential use within certified Missouri Innovation Zones. This tax credit for qualified conversion expenditures will apply to all tax years starting on or after January 1, 2027. Qualified conversion expenditures include capital expenditures associated with adaptive reuse and redevelopment of office buildings. Projects receiving incentives will be evaluated using the Department’s master scorecard criteria. MISSOURI OPPORTUNITY ZONE (Section 620.6027) The bill creates the "Missouri Opportunity Zone" program within certified Missouri Innovation Zones. The program is designed to encourage long-term private investment by allowing a taxpayer to defer certain Missouri income tax liabilities when eligible gains are reinvested into qualifying businesses or property located within the zone. The Department of Revenue will administer tax filings, certifications, and reporting requirements for the program. MISSOURI ANGEL INVESTMENT PROGRAM (620.6030) The bill creates an angel investment incentive to be administered by the Department of Economic Development and the Missouri Technology Corporation. For tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, tax credits may be issued for cash investments in qualified Missouri businesses operating within certified Missouri Innovation Zones. A tax credit will be up to 40% of an investor's cash investment or up to 50% of the cash investment is in the qualified securities of a qualified business in a rural county. The credit will be up to 60% of the cash investment if it is in the qualified securities of a qualified business in a certified innovation zone. Qualified Missouri businesses are subject to reporting requirements, compliance standards, and clawback provisions if headquarters or substantial Missouri operations are relocated outside the state within 10 years after receiving assistance. The bill permits issued tax credits to be transferred to another natural person if the original investor has not yet claimed the credit. Qualified businesses receiving investments must submit annual reports to the Missouri Technology Corporation (MTC), and the MTC must submit quarterly and annual reports relating to tax credit allocations, investments, jobs, economic impacts, and business retention outcomes to the Director of the Department of Economic Development.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/13/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

HB3233 Prohibits wearing face coverings at any assembly at public buildings
Sponsor Rep. Jamie Gragg (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits wearing a mask or otherwise covering one's face at any assembly occurring in or on the grounds of a public building, with the following exceptions: (1) A mask or facial covering for the purpose of ensuring one's physical health and safety or the health and safety of others including, but not limited to, limiting the spread of airborne illnesses; or (2) A mask or facial covering worn for religious purposes.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3235 Modifies and repeals provisions relating to duties of the joint committee on education
Sponsor Rep. Ed Lewis (R)
Summary
This bill repeals or modifies duties of the Joint Committee on Education that have expired or changed. Currently, Section 21.487, RSMo, requires that the committee develop a comprehensive funding formula for public institutions of higher education. The deadline for that formula was 2015. This bill modifies the provision to require a report from the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development and make recommendations to the General Assembly. Repealed duties include a provision requiring: the creation of a committee to investigate facility access and affordability for charter schools , which provision expired in 2016 in Section 160.405; a report on the review of policies and procedures in remedial education, which provision expired in 2017 in Section 173.750; the repeal of the Career Readiness Course Task Force, which dissolved in 2019 in Section 167.910; the review of the study on information technology certificates, which provision expired in 2015 in Section 173.680; and technical and administrative support for the Legislative Task Force on Dyslexia, which provision expired in 2018 in Section 633.420.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3238 Modifies and establishes provisions relating to elementary and secondary education
Sponsor Rep. Renee Reuter (R)
Summary
This bill creates code of conduct standards for members of the school boards and for the governing board of charter schools. The bill requires a public disclosure of member and employee conflicts of interest as specified, including payments in excess of $500 per year to the following: superintendents, administrative staff, chief purchasing officers, and general counsel for school districts. Such individuals must disclose additional information as specified in the bill. The bill prevents school districts from retaining any attorney or law firm for the purpose of providing counsel during an administrative or legal proceeding concerning a student if the attorney or law firm employs or contracts with the school district's members or employees (Section 162.106, RSMo). This bill requires that for hearings regarding children with disabilities the burden of proof and the burden of production will be on the school district regarding any matter related to identification, evaluation, reevaluation, classification, educational placement, disciplinary action, or the provision of free appropriate public education. The bill provides protections for students in a IEP proceeding, including mediation, being allowed to remain in the present educational placement or stay put during the pendency of the proceedings(Section 162.961). This bill requires that the most recent student special education records as defined in the bill are to be retained by school districts as part of the student's permanent record and such records may not be destroyed by the district (Section 167.027). This bill is similar to HB 2860 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/26/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Local Government

HB3242 Enacts provisions governing maximum percentages of local real property tax levies
Sponsor Rep. Michael Davis (R)
Summary
This bill provides that the total amount of combined real property tax levies levied and imposed by all taxing authorities upon residential real property must not exceed: (1) Seven percent of the assessed value of all residential real property within the borders of an incorporated city, town, or village if the entity has a municipal tax levy; or (2) Six percent of the assessed value of all residential real property within a county that is outside the boundaries of an incorporated city, town, or village or within the borders of an city, town, or village that does not have a municipal tax levy. If the total amount of combined real property tax levies levied and imposed by all taxing authorities on residential real property exceeds the applicable limits, the taxing authority must proportionately reduce each levy individually to ensure such limits are not exceeded.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3247 Modifies the definition of food to authorize a reduced sales tax on the purchase of dietary and nutritional supplements
Sponsor Rep. Mike Jones (R)
Summary
Currently, a tax is levied on the retail sale of food at a rate of 1%. This bill changes the definition of food for this purpose to also include all "dietary and nutritional supplements", as defined in the bill. This bill is similar to HB 3151 (2026 and HCS HB 1107 (2025) .
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3250 Requires schools to create a policy requiring parent permission for students to participate in protest activities
Sponsor Rep. Mike McGirl (R)
Summary
This bill requires school districts to establish a policy for student participation in protest activities, as defined in the bill. The bill clarifies provisions of the policy, including but not limited to, parental permission for participation. Schools that violate the policy requirements must receive a reduction in state funding.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3253 Modifies provisions relating to property tax
Sponsor Rep. Kathy Steinhoff (D)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 11 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3253 & 3254. ASSESSORS (Section 53.255, 137.121, 137.180, 137.355, 137.490) Currently, the State Tax Commission (STC) must set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours for each course of study for assessors and assessor-elects. This bill adds that the State Tax Commission must either set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours or at least 40 hours for any new assessor or assessor-elect and at least 40 hours of training for any newly elected assessor. The bill requires each assessor to attend at least one additional approved course of study within each 2-year period to remain certified. Currently, the Director of Revenue must suspend payments of assessment costs by the State to the county in which the assessor is serving once notified by the Commission that the assessor has failed to properly comply with certification requirements and until the assessor complies or is no longer in office. This bill repeals this provision and allows an assessor to: (1) Create, maintain, and store certain information in an electronic format; (2) Establish electronic notification and record delivery systems; (3) Notify property owners of an increased valuation or projected tax liability via first-class mail or by electronic means; and (4) Provide other official communication electronically. Currently, when an assessor increases the valuation of any real property they must notify the record owner of the increase, either in person, or by mail to the last known address of the owner, this bill specifies first-class mail and adds that the valuation may be sent by electronic means, including email or secure electronic delivery, as long as the property owner has consented to electronic delivery or has provided an email address to the assessor's office. PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES (Section 139.031 and 139.053) The bill allows the governing body of any county to provide for partial payments on residential real property taxes assessed and in dispute in certain circumstances. The county may enter into an agreement with a taxpayer to require the taxpayer to make a minimum payment as described in the bill. If a taxpayer fails to make the initial approved partial payment on or before the due date in the agreement, the county must charge the taxpayer interest and penalties on the amount of property taxes still owed. Currently, any county other than a township county may, by order or ordinance, allow its taxpayers the option to pay any part of their real and personal property taxes on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis. This bill allows township counties the option to pass such an order or ordinance. The bill also requires the governing body of each county or city not within a county to allow for pre-payment of current real property taxes owed on an annual, semi-annual, quarterly, or monthly basis. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill addresses topics that were discussed during the property tax hearings that occurred across the state. Those in support of the bill say it addresses per parcel rate to fund assessment resources, payment requirements when an assessment is under appeal, training for assessors, use of technology during assessments, and property tax levies by subclass. Supporters state that giving additional resources to assessors, requiring additional training for assessors, and provisions that help taxpayers to make their payments will be good for special districts. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Steinhoff; and Missouri Special Districts Association. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that the idea for state reimbursement to counties is good, but the question is where the funds for this reimbursement will come from. Those testifying state that the State Tax Commission (STC) must be responsible for ensuring there is fairness in assessments via equalization. Others testifying on the bill say that commissioners from the STC do not have mandatory trainings, but they do often attend trainings. Testifying in person on the bill were Missouri Council Of School Administrators; and Dan Hutton, State Tax Commission/State Ombudsman. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

HB3254 Modifies provisions relating to property tax
Sponsor Rep. Will Jobe (D)
Summary
ASSESSORS (Section 53.255, 137.121, 137.180, 137.355, and 137.490) Currently, the State Tax Commission (STC) must set classroom time totaling at least 32 hours for each course of study for assessors and assessor-elects. This bill adds that the STC must set classroom time totaling at least 40 hours for any new assessor or assessor-elect beginning January 1, 2027. Any newly elected assessor must complete at least 40 hours of training before assuming office. This bill requires assessors to attend at least one additional approved course of study within each 2-year period to remain certified. Currently, once the state director of revenue is notified by the STC that an assessor has failed to comply with certification requirements, the state director of revenue must immediately suspend payments of assessment costs to the county in which the assessor is serving. These payments must be suspended until one of the following occurs: (1) The assessor complies with certification requirements; (2) The assessor resigns from office; (3) The assessor is removed from office by appropriate legal action; or (4) The assessor?s successor is qualified. The bill repeals this provision. This bill requires the assessor to conduct a physical inspection of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property before the assessor can increase the assessed valuation of such parcel of real property by more than 15%. The bill allows county assessors to use technology to determine the true value in money of real property if it is used in accordance with accepted mass appraisal standards. This bill also allows authorized technology to be used to satisfy any physical inspection requirements. The bill allows assessors to: (1) Create, maintain, and store certain information in an electronic format; (2) Establish electronic notification and record delivery systems; (3) Notify property owners of an increased valuation or projected tax liability via first-class mail or by electronic means; and (4) Provide other official communication electronically. PROPERTY TAX RATES (Section 137.073, 137.079, 137.115) Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase may levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate. The bill removes mention of the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate. Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property, in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline. As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals mention of a single property tax rate and replaces such language with that relating to multiple tax rates. Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill no. 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county may also opt out of implementing certain provisions of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill no. 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes. This bill repeals the references to the provisions of House bill no. 1150 (2002) and Senate bill no. 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt out of or to implement such provisions. The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county to determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate. ASSESSMENT MAINTENANCE PLANS (Section 137.750) Currently, the State must reimburse each eligible county a minimum of $3.00 per parcel for up to 20,000 parcels if the county has an approved assessment maintenance plan. This bill increases the minimum to $4.00 per parcel. . PROPERTY TAX CREDITS (Section 137.1050 and 137.1055) Currently, any county that is authorized to impose a property tax may grant a property tax credit to seniors who own a qualifying homestead. The bill requires the State to reimburse any political subdivision for any decrease in revenue due to this authorized tax credit. Currently, certain counties must place on the ballot a question whether to grant a homestead property tax credit to limit the increase of an eligible taxpayer?s real property tax liability on his or her homestead. This bill requires the State to reimburse any political subdivision for any decrease in revenue due to this authorized tax credit. PAYMENT OF PROPERTY TAXES (Section 139.031 and 139.053) The bill allows the governing body of any county to provide for partial payments on residential real property taxes assessed and in dispute in certain circumstances. Such county can enter into an agreement with a taxpayer to require the taxpayer to make a minimum payment, as described in the bill. If a taxpayer fails to make the initial approved partial payment on or before the due date stated in the agreement, the county must charge the taxpayer interest on the amount of property taxes still owed. Currently, the governing body of any county can allow, by ordinance or order, the option for taxpayers to pay any part of their real and personal property taxes on an annual, semiannual, or quarterly basis. However, township counties are excluded from the ability to allow taxpayers these payment options. This bill allows township counties the option to pass such an order or ordinance. The bill also requires the governing body of each county or city not within a county to allow for pre-payment of current real property taxes owed on an annual, semi-annual, or quarterly basis. This bill is similar to HB 3253 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026
H - Superseded by HB 3253

HB3275 Modifies and establishes provisions relating to moneys in school funds
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
This bill makes changes to existing restrictions on school district accounting funds. Currently, unexpended balances in the debt service fund can transfer to the capital projects fund. This bill changes that transfer to the teachers' fund. Similarly, interest earned in the capital project fund can be transferred to the teachers' fund instead of the incidental fund. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, all interest earned from balances in the teachers', incidental, capital projects, and debt service funds must be used to supplement, not supplant, moneys used for teacher salaries. The bill also caps the capital projects fund to a maximum of 10% over obligations within a fiscal year and requires any additional money in the fund to be transferred to the teacher's fund for teacher salaries. The bill has a delayed effective date of July 1, 2027.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3283 Modifies provisions relating to public labor organizations
Sponsor Rep. Chris Brown (R)
Summary
HCS HBs 3283 & 3306 -- PUBLIC LABOR ORGANIZATIONS (Brown) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Local Government This bill establishes new procedures for public labor organizations and public bodies in Missouri when negotiating collective bargaining agreements. The bill applies only to public employees authorized by law to form and join labor organizations. This bill mandates that within 30 days of a labor organization being recognized as the exclusive representative for public employees, both parties must begin good faith bargaining over wages, benefits, and other employment terms. If an agreement is not reached within 180 days, the dispute goes to mediation, and if still unresolved after 90 days with a mediator, it moves to arbitration. The bill also outlines a process for selecting an arbitrator if parties cannot agree, involving panels from Federal services, including the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) or the American Arbitration Association (AAA), with the arbitrator's decision being binding unless it requires new legislation. Furthermore, the bill defines "good faith" bargaining and allows either party to submit claims of bad faith bargaining to the board for determination, potentially leading to arbitration. Public bodies are prohibited from making unilateral changes to wages, benefits, or other mandatory bargaining terms once a labor organization is recognized or an agreement expires, and violations can lead to legal action for damages and injunctive relief. The bill also includes provisions for successor agreements and allows the board to create necessary rules for implementation. This bill is similar to SB 1529 (2026).
Progress
House: Perfected
Last Action
04/22/2026
H - Committee hearing cancelled - 4/23/26 - 10:30 am or Upon Adjournment - HR 5 - House-Legislative Review

HB3299 Requires that newly elected members of the general assembly be issued a calculator
Sponsor Rep. Doug Clemens (D)
Summary
This bill provides that each newly elected member of the General Assembly will be issued a calculator and a calculator instruction booklet beginning with the general election in 2026.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3305 Modifies provisions governing mental health efforts in public schools
Sponsor Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R)
Summary
Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, suicide prevention training and school district policies on youth suicide awareness are required to include training and guidance on using the Columbia Protocol, also known as Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), for suicide risk assessment and training on the mental health virtual tool created under this bill. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, mental health awareness training currently provided in grades nine to 12 must be expanded to include additional age appropriate instruction relating to suicide awareness, tools for identifying potential suicide signs, strategies and protocols for helping students at risk, and other provisions specified in the bill. The bill requires that the current mental health training and awareness instruction be expanded to grades five to eight beginning in the 2027-28 school year; this provision will be known as "Brennan's Law" and such instruction must be included in existing health or physical education curriculum. The bill requires the Department of Mental Health's Children's Office to develop and implement a virtual tool to enhance access to mental health resources. Criteria for the virtual tool include an online resource directory, a method to allow individual screening and assessment relating to mental health, and additional information and support deemed necessary by the Department. This bill is similar to HB 3024 (2026) and HB 1529 and HB 244 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3306 Modifies provisions relating to public labor organizations
Sponsor Rep. Nick Kimble (D)
Summary
Within 30 days after a labor organization has been designated as the exclusive bargaining representative for the public employees in a bargaining unit, the bargaining process must begin with representatives of the public body and representatives of the labor organization meeting and bargaining in good faith, as that term is defined in the bill, for an agreement covering the wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment for the public employees within the bargaining unit. The labor organization and the public body must engage in good faith bargaining with each other's designated representatives. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached within 180 days after a labor organization is designated as exclusive bargaining representative for the public employees in a bargaining unit, the dispute will be referred to mediation. If, after 90 days, mediation has not been successful then the matter will be referred to arbitration, as described below. At any time during the bargaining process, if either the labor organization or the public body determines an impasse has been reached over wages, benefits, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment, the party can submit the matter to interest arbitration. If the parties agree that an impasse has been reached, within seven days of such decision, the public body and labor organization must attempt to agree upon an impartial arbitrator to resolve the impasse. If an arbitrator cannot be agreed upon within such time period then the party that made the initial determination of impasse must request a panel of seven arbitrators from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services. The parties will alternate striking from the panel one arbitrator at a time until a single arbitrator is left, with the party that made the initial determination of impasse striking first. The party striking first must have the affirmative duty to notify the State Board of Mediation that the matter has been referred to interest arbitration. Once an arbitrator has been selected, the parties must proceed to present their arguments. Within 45 days the arbitrator will submit its decision. The decision of the arbitrator must be binding upon the parties, provided that any provision that would require the enactment of law for its implementation will not be binding until such time as the law is enacted. If, at any time during the bargaining process for an initial contract or for successor contracts, either the labor organization or public body believes the opposing party has engaged in bad faith bargaining in violation of this bill it can submit the matter to the Board for determination. If the Board determines a party has engaged in bad faith bargaining in violation of this bill it must refer the matter to interest arbitration in accordance with this bill. This bill is similar to SB 1529 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026
H - Superseded by HB 3283

HB3308 Authorizes a sales tax exemption for certain purchases of materials and equipment
Sponsor Rep. Travis Wilson (R)
Summary
HCS HB 3308 -- SALES TAX EXEMPTION (Wilson) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Commerce This bill exempts from sales and use tax all sales and purchases of equipment and materials by a contractor or subcontractor for development and construction of public improvements to real property and public facilities that, under an approved development plan, will be owned by the United States government, the State, or any county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the State.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/29/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

HB3309 Establishes provisions relating to protest activities
Sponsor Rep. Brian Seitz (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits students from establishing, organizing, or participating in any protest activity on or off the property of a public school during regularly scheduled instructional periods of learning if such activity materially and substantially disrupts the public school's operations. The bill outlines consequences for students, teachers, and school districts or charter schools and provides that school districts and charter schools may adopt content-neutral policies governing the time, place, and manner of student expression. Students must not be disciplined solely for engaging in peaceful expression unless such conduct meets the criteria in the bill.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3310 Modifies the required school year start date for school districts in which a charter school operates
Sponsor Rep. Wick Thomas (D)
Summary
This bill allows any school district in which a charter school is operating to set an opening school date earlier than 14 calendar days prior to the first Monday in September. This bill is similar to HB 430 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3311 Modifies and establishes provisions relating to school libraries
Sponsor Rep. Wick Thomas (D)
Summary
This bill requires that school districts adopt a collection development and maintenance policy, a library program and display policy, and a library material review and reconsideration policy to ensure that all library resources are evaluated and made accessible. The bill provides standards that the policies must meet, including 1st Amendment protections and protections from harassment and discrimination. School boards may remove a library resource from the collection only after a review according to policy. Districts must follow guidelines required in the policy for reconsideration. Complaints will be limited to those made by a student, staff member, or parent or guardian of a student of the school. The bill provides for a review committee composed of a principal, librarian, classroom teacher, department head in the subject area of the material, and a community member to evaluate, read, and make recommendations on resource removal within 60 days of a request. Once a decision has been made, material may not be subject for review for four years. The policy on displays and programs must not limit or censor for doctrinal or partisan reason. Requests for material reconsideration are to be made public. Protections are provided for staff members following the policy process.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3322 Modifies provisions relating to educational stability for a child in foster care
Sponsor Rep. Wendy Hausman (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Children and Families by a vote of 14 to 0. Currently, a child-placing agency for foster care pupils must make a best interest determination for school placement within 10 days and only for foster children more than 10 miles from their previous school or 15 miles if the child is receiving services from a special school district. This bill changes the number of days for a determination to 30 or if it is during the summer when school is not in session 60 days, and moves the distance to 30 miles or 35 miles for services in a special school district. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill provides stability for foster kids. It's not about speed, it's about getting it done right the first time. This bill will prevent kids from being bounced around from school to school. The best interest of the child is what should be considered, and a foster child's eduction is important. Foster care kids are some of the most at-risk educationally. The bill would keep the positive aspects of a child's life contiguous. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Hausman; Arnie Dienoff; and FosterAdopt Connect. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/14/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Children and Families

HB3342 Prohibits personal property tax levies passed prior to January 1, 1975, from applying to motor vehicles
Sponsor Rep. Mark Matthiesen (R)
Summary
This bill prohibits personal property tax levies passed by voters prior to January 1, 1975, from applying to motor vehicles.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/05/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

HB3347 Creates new provisions for political subdivisions contracts for legal services
Sponsor Rep. Jim Murphy (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Commerce by a vote of 5 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3347. This bill regulates contingent fee contracts used by political subdivisions for legal services. To enter a contract, the governing body must hold a public meeting with a notice detailing the reasons for pursuing the matter, the qualifications of the attorney or firm, any existing relationships between the political subdivision and the attorney or firm, why internal resources or hourly contracts are inadequate, and how the arrangement benefits residents of the political subdivision. The governing body must also make a written finding that there is substantial need for the legal services, that they cannot be adequately performed internally, and that they cannot be reasonably obtained from attorneys under a different type of payment structure. The contract must then be approved in an open meeting. A contingent fee contract must ensure that the political subdivision maintains ultimate control over the case, that final approval is reserved by the political subdivision, and that contingency fees have the same limits set for state contingency fee legal services contracts. Before becoming effective and enforceable, the political subdivision must obtain approval of the contract from the Attorney General (AG). The political subdivision must provide relevant documents related to its decision to enter into the contract to the AG. Within 45 days after the political subdivision provides this information to the AG, the AG must approve or refuse to approve the contract. Reasons the AG may refuse to approve the contract are provided in the bill. For enforcement, the AG may intervene in judicial or quasi- judicial proceedings involving non-compliant contracts to request dismissal without prejudice. If the court or quasi-judicial body concludes the contract for legal services does not comply with this section, then the court must dismiss the matter without prejudice. The bill also contains a grandfather clause which provides that nothing contained in Section 67.5500, RSMo, will apply to any law suit brought prior to August 28, 2026, and will proceed unless the AG intervenes. Further, under Section 311.038 this bill preempts local regulation of alcohol sales and gives the state exclusive authority over the container size, fluid ounces per container, the alcohol content, and the number of containers allowed per transaction. This Section also provides that any existing or future local laws, ordinances, or regulations attempting to control those same aspects are null and void as of the effective date. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill provides clear requirements for political subdivisions when signing contracts with lawyers. The supporters of the bill also said that having the AG approve lawsuits and contracts will mitigate any issues or disputes over attorney's fees. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Murphy; Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits LLC; Missouri Petroleum & Convenience Association; Molson Coors Beverage Company USA LLC; Missouri Association of Beer Wholesalers; Andrew Cook, American Tort Reform Association; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that the local governments should be allowed to make their own decisions and not have the State intervene in every lawsuit the local government files. Some opponents to the bill raised concerns regarding the language in the bill, specifically how the bill does not address current contracts between local governments and lawyers. Testifying in person against the bill were Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys; Missouri Municipal League; Missouri Association of Counties; and Municipal League of Metro St. Louis; and Steven Berezney. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/09/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Commerce

HB3354 Modifies the tax levy for blind pensions
Sponsor Rep. Tim Taylor (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 13 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3354. Currently, the levy for blind pensions is set at a rate of $0.03 per $100 valuation of taxable property. This bill changes the levy to 2.75 cents per $100 valuation of taxable property. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the Blind Pension Fund is the only state property tax imposed, but the number of participants in the Blind Pension Fund is decreasing. Those in support of the bill state the bill rolls back the state property tax levy from $0.03 to $0.0275. Testifying in person for the bill was Representative Taylor. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/12/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

HB3381 Allows county commissions to opt out of collecting late fees and penalties on delinquent property taxes
Sponsor Rep. Mark Meirath (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs by a vote of 12 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HB 3381. This bill allows the governing bodies of counties to, by order or ordinance, prohibit the collection of any late fees or penalties on delinquent property taxes. The order or ordinance can prohibit the collection only in unusual circumstances or circumstances beyond the taxpayer's control. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that state law has created a due process issue for the county. About a dozen times a year, situations arise that aren't a person's fault, and the commissioners don't have the opportunity to waive penalties, because State law says you can only waive where an issue is the fault of the county. There was an individual who had paid by mail, and the check was stolen from her mailbox. Another person was hospitalized with cancer for the payment period. Last year, Clay County would have waived penalties for four or five people. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Meirath; Arnie Dienoff; and Jay Johnson. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. OTHERS: Others testifying on the bill say that the County Employees' Retirement Fund's primary funding source is employee contributions, which far outpaces the fees, but the fees are a consistent portion of the budget. The reason this was done was that many counties couldn?t afford to join LAGERS. This is the pension for everyone else. A few dollars of lots of local fees goes to this. At the time, it was logical to say bad actions should have penalties, and it?s reasonable for those penalties to fund good things. This treats all people the same as bad actors. The criteria should be specified as to when to waive the penalty. The system is set up so that each entity in the county makes small steady contributions. Testifying in person on the bill was the County Employee Retirement Fund. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/14/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs

HB3390 Creates new provisions related to the construction of data centers
Sponsor Rep. Scott Cupps (R)
Summary
This bill establishes new regulations for the construction and operation of "hyperscale data centers", defined as facilities requiring at least 25 megawatts of energy to house and operate equipment for storing, processing, or transmitting data. The bill prohibits hyperscale data centers from being built on land zoned for agricultural, conservation, environmental stewardship, mixed-use, or residential purposes and requires a minimum 500-foot setback from other properties, with a barrier of native Missouri plants. The bill also mandates noise-control measures during construction, adhering to Federal standards, and restricts their placement within ten miles of agricultural, recreational, or conservation areas, or within 5 miles of State waters. Before construction, local governments must hold public hearings, notify affected property owners within a 10-mile radius, and then seek approval from the "Hyperscale Data Center Siting Board", which is composed of statewide elected officials and has the final say on project approval. This Board is created and established within the bill. Furthermore, the bill prevents public utilities from collecting impact fees from residential or small commercial customers to cover the costs of new hyperscale data center construction, prohibits governmental entities from providing economic incentives for hyperscale data centers unless they receive an affidavit attesting the applicant is not one, and requires a major industrial water user permit for any entity withdrawing over 2.4 million gallons of water per day, with strict review criteria to protect existing water uses and resources.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3391 Modifies provisions relating to admission of nonresident students
Sponsor Rep. Cameron Parker (R)
Summary
Currently, owners of residential real or agricultural real property and named beneficiaries of trusts can send up to four children to a school district if such individuals pay at least $2,000 annually in school tax over at least four years even if the children do not reside in the district. This bill lowers the annual payment of tax requirement to $1,500 and adds a remainderman, as defined in the bill, to the eligible individuals who may send children to a district they do not reside in.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3393 Establishes the "Megan Meier Act"
Sponsor Rep. Don Mayhew (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Emerging Issues by a vote of 12 to 1. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3393 & 2392. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MENTAL HEALTH (Section 407.3007) This bill prohibits any person or entity that develops or deploys artificial intelligence (AI) in this State from advertising or representing to the public that the AI is, or is able to act as, a mental health professional or is capable of providing therapy services, psychotherapy services, or a mental health diagnosis. A violation of this provision constitutes an unlawful practice under the Missouri merchandising practices act. The Attorney General is required to enforce the provisions of this bill, though any individual can report violations to the Attorney General. If a violation is found to have occurred, the Attorney General must commence a civil action. The bill provides for civil penalties as follows: (1) $10,000 for the first violation; or (2) $20,000 for any subsequent violation. SOCIAL MEDIA USE BY MINORS (Section 407.3475) This bill establishes the "Megan Meier Act". The term "Social media platform" is defined in the bill, but such term does not include: (1) Services primarily used for email, direct messaging, or business collaboration; (2) Educational platforms used by schools; (3) Online video gaming services; and (4) Internet service providers. The bill prohibits a minor who is under 16 years of age from creating or maintaining an account; minors who are 16 years of age or older can hold an account only with the verified consent of a parent or legal guardian. The bill allows for social media platforms to permit the creation of an account, but such platforms must provide parents or guardians with the option to: (1) Access and review account activity; (2) Request deletion of the minor's account; and (3) Limit messaging features between the minor and unverified adult accounts. The bill requires social media platforms to implement a secure age-verification process for all Missouri users prior to the creation of an account and sets parameters for permissible age verification techniques. Social media platforms are required to immediately terminate any account found to belong to a person under 16 years of age. If a verified parent or guardian requests deletion of a minor's account, the social media platform must comply within 10 business days of receiving such a request. The bill prohibits social media platforms from: (1) Using addictive or manipulative design features specifically targeting minors; (2) Permitting direct messaging from adults to minors unless the adult is a verified contact; or (3) Serving targeted advertising to minors under 16 years of age based or personal data or behavioral profiling. CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION FOR SEXUALLY EXPLICIT AI (Section 537.039) This bill makes it unlawful for a person or entity to: (1) Use AI to replicate or alter an image or voice of an individual to generate explicit sexual material, unless the person or entity received express written consent; or (2) Use the likeness of an individual by using AI for explicit sexual material, unless the person or entity received express written consent. Any individual injured through a violation of these provisions can bring a civil cause of action against the person or entity for actual damages, attorney's fees and costs. CIVIL CAUSE OF ACTION FOR DISCLOSURE OF DIGITAL DEPICTION (Section 537.043) This bill creates a civil cause of action against a person who discloses a digital depiction, as defined in the bill, of an individual who is under 18 years of age or an intimate digital depiction, as defined in the bill, of an individual and who knows or recklessly disregards the fact that the individual has not consented to such disclosure. The depicted individual may recover damages, as specified in the bill, along with injunctive relief. An action cannot be brought if the disclosure was made in good faith to or by a law enforcement officer in the course of reporting or investigating unlawful conduct or as part of a legal proceeding; or if the disclosure was a matter of legitimate public concern or interest or if the disclosure reasonably intended to assist the depicted individual. A civil action can also be brought against a parent or legal guardian who discloses an intimate digital depiction of his or her child. CRIMINAL OFFENSE FOR ARTIFICIALLY GENERATED VISUAL DEPICTION (Section 573.010) Currently, the criminal offense for possession or distribution of child pornography includes visual depictions in photographs, films, videos, pictures, or computer-generated images that involves: (1) The production of such visual depiction in which a minor is engaging in sexually explicit conduct; (2) The use of digital, computer, or computer-generated images that depicts a minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct; or (3) The creation, adaptation, or modification of a visual depiction that shows an identifiable minor engaging in sexually explicit conduct. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction", as defined in the bill, to the definition of "child pornography". Currently, the definition of "material" in relation to pornography criminal offenses includes, but is not limited to, anything printed or written, pictures, drawings, photographs, films, videotapes or videotape productions, and pictorial representations. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction" to the definition. CRIMINAL OFFENSE FOR EXPLICIT SEXUAL MATERIAL (Section 573.550) Currently, the definition of "explicit sexual material" in relation to explicit sexual material criminal offenses includes, but is not limited to, any pictorial, three-dimensional, or visual depictions. This bill adds "artificially generated visual depiction" to the definition. CRIMINAL OFFENSE FOR DISCLOSURE OF DIGITAL DEPICTION (Section 573.570) The bill also creates the criminal offense of disclosure of a digital depiction. A person commits the offense if the person discloses, or threatens to disclose: (1) A digital depiction of an individual; or (2) An intimate digital depiction with the intent to harass, annoy, threaten, alarm, or cause substantial harm to the finances or reputation of the depicted individual or with the actual knowledge that or reckless disregard for whether the disclosure or threat of disclosure will cause harm to the depicted individual. A person will be guilty of a Class E felony for the first offense or a Class C felony for any second and subsequent offenses. A person will be guilty of a Class D felony if the digital depiction is of an individual under 18 years of age. The criminal penalties will apply to any parent or legal guardian who discloses an intimate digital depiction of his or her child. It will not be a defense in a civil or criminal proceeding that there is a disclaimer stating that the digital depiction was unauthorized or that the depicted individual did not participate in the creation or development of the digital depiction. No later than December 31, 2026, an information content provider, as defined in the bill, must establish a process in which a depicted person can request the removal of a published digital depiction or an intimate digital depiction. Once the information content provider receives such a request, it must follow certain procedures, as described in the bill; however, the information content provider and certain other entities, as described in the bill, will not be held liable for such depictions. The criminal penalties will not apply to certain Federally defined interactive computer services, law enforcement, a person reporting unlawful activity, or a person participating in a hearing, trial, or other legal proceeding. This bill is similar to HB 2392 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the use of social media can have negative impacts on society because of its addictive features, portrayal of unnatural bodies, and the risk of suicidal ideation. Supporters further state that the mounting evidence and studies overwhelmingly show that these social media apps are not neutral tools, but rather purposefully disrupt the lives of users, most especially young people. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Mayhew; Issachar LLC; Missouri Network of Child Advocacy Centers Inc.; Missouri Chapter of The American Academy of Pediatrics; and Missouri Psychological Association. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/02/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Emerging Issues

HB3416 Establishes the "Strengthening HBCUs Act"
Sponsor Rep. LaKeySha Bosley (D)
Summary
This bill creates the "Strengthening HBCUs ACT" and defines HCBUs as historically black colleges and universities that receive grant awards under Federal programs. The bill creates the "Strengthening HBCUs Fund", that will receive 1% of excursion gambling boat proceeds and 1% of net proceeds from the Missouri state lottery, in addition to any gifts, contributions, grants or donations. Money in the Fund is to be equally divided among the HCBUs in the State for capital projects and activities that meet specified Federal guidelines. The bill requires that such funding supplement and does not supplant the level of funding for HCBUs in fiscal year 2027.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/07/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Higher Education and Workforce Development

HB3442 Establishes provisions relating to reports of child abuse or neglect
Sponsor Rep. Nick Kimble (D)
Summary
This bill mandates that the Department of Social Services maintain a state repository of all reports of abuse and neglect. This repository?s purpose is to provide information to assist in the proper evaluation of current reports, which may include a pattern of incidents. The depository will contain a registry of substantiated reports. The names of certain individuals who are determined to be perpetrators of abuse or neglect will not be placed on the registry until that individual has exhausted all administrative appeals. All decisions rendered by an administrative judge are final. The Department of Social Services must immediately provide information involving an investigation to certain bodies as determined by the bill when necessary. All records of reports of child abuse or neglect are confidential except as provided in the bill. Upon written request of a court, the Department will search the registry and report back to the court if the alleged perpetrator is: (1) An individual applying to work as a court-appointed special advocate; (2) A CASA staff member; or (3) A member of the CASA board of directors. If a report is determined to be substantiated, subsequent adjudication shall be added to the central registry. Information from inconclusive reports may be disclosed with the applicant?s written consent for the limited purpose of evaluating the applicant to be a foster parent, adoptive parent, or caregiver. Any violation of confidentiality subjects an offender to criminal prosecution. The Department can charge a fee to conduct a search that does not exceed $25 when a search is specifically authorized.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3444 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Rep. Bob Titus (R)
Summary
Beginning January 1, 2027, and in addition to the other reductions allowed to the top rate of tax, this bill reduces the top rate of tax by 0.17%. Such reduction to the top rate of tax will only occur if one or more institutions are subject to the tax on the endowments of higher education institutions imposed in this bill (Section 143.011, RSMo). Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill imposes a tax on the endowments of qualifying institutions of higher education at a rate of 1.9% of the aggregate fair market value of the assets of such endowments. The tax must apply to the endowments of qualifying higher education institutions that: 1) Are affiliated with, or provide medical faculty to, any abortion facility; 2) Offer specific medical residencies or fellowships that offer training in performing or inducing abortions; or 3) Support in any manner any abortion facility where abortions are performed or induced when not necessary to save the life of the mother. Any institution that becomes a qualifying institution of higher education must remain subject to the tax imposed by this bill even if the institution no longer meets the criteria of a qualifying institution of higher education.(Section 146.200, RSMo). This bill is similar to SB 950 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3476 Modifies provisions governing the calculation of assessed valuation of real and personal property
Sponsor Rep. Rodger Reedy (R)
Summary
This bill provides for a roll-back trigger on the assessment ratio as it relates to personal property and real property tax assessments. The bill provides that, for future calculations of assessment ratios and beginning January 1, 2027, the base year assessments for future calculations of assessment ratios will be: 33.3% for personal property; 19% for residential real property; 12% for agricultural and horticultural real property; and 32% for commercial real property. Beginning January 1, 2027, the State Tax Commission (STC) must calculate the statewide increase in value for each subclass of real property, individually. The STC must then revise the assessment ratios for each subclass of real property so that the statewide assessed value for each subclass of real property is the same amount as the previous general reassessment year?s statewide assessed value plus inflationary growth. The inflationary assessment growth must be limited to the total assessed value growth in each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, not to exceed the lessor of the increase in inflation or 5%. Currently, to determine the projected tax liability, the assessor must provide the clerk with the assessment book, and this assessment book must contain: (1) Real estate values for the current year; (2) State assessed values from the previous year; and (3) Personal property values from the previous year. In addition to this assessment book, the bill requires the assessor to also provide the STC with the values needed to calculate the assessment ratios, and the calculated assessment ratios must be submitted to each assessor?s office by March 15th. Currently, the clerk must make an abstract of the assessment book containing certain information for each political subdivision entitled to levy ad valorem taxes on property by March 15th. This bill changes this deadline to March 30th. Currently, the governing body of each political subdivision or an individual designee must use the information in the abstract to project a nonbinding tax levy and return such projected tax levy to the clerk by April 8th. This bill changes this deadline to April 15th.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3485 Authorizes private school students to participate in extracurricular activities at public schools under certain conditions
Sponsor Rep. Josh Hurlbert (R)
Summary
This bill allows a private school student who attends a private school that does not belong to a statewide athletic association, to participate in a sport or activity at the local public school if such sport or activity is not offered by the private school. This bill is similar to SB 1641 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3488 Establishes provisions relating to students at risk of suicide or self-harm
Sponsor Rep. Cecelie Williams (R)
Summary
Beginning July 1, 2027, school districts must have in place protocols for helping students who may be at risk of self-harm. Protocols include reporting to designated staff members and parental notification. The designated staff member will perform a risk assessment and the student may not be released from school until the parent or guardian has received notice.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3489 Establishes provisions relating to college and career readiness assessments
Sponsor Rep. Josh Hurlbert (R)
Summary
Currently, a school district is required to give students the opportunity to take the ACT WorkKeys assessment required for the National Career Readiness Certificate (WorkKeys), at no cost to the student, only if the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education directs a State-funded census administration of the ACT assessment or if the school district funds the administration of the ACT assessment. This bill requires that a school district must administer college and career readiness assessments, including a career readiness assessment that leads to a nationally recognized work readiness certificate, in a manner and frequency prescribed by the State Board of Education. Such assessments will be administered to each student before the student graduates from high school. A career readiness assessment may include WorkKeys. A school district may offer additional college and career readiness assessments, at no cost to the student, by using funds appropriated by the General Assembly for such purpose. Additionally, each public institution of higher education may adopt and implement a policy to use a credential earned through WorkKeys as a transcribable credit toward the attainment of a postsecondary technical degree as recommended by the American Council on Education national guide. This bill is similar to SB 1729 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/15/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HB3495 Bans using seclusion to confine a student
Sponsor Rep. Louis Riggs (R)
Summary
This bill requires that beginning in the 2027-28 school year, school districts, charter schools, and publicly contracted private providers stop using seclusion on students as a form of punishment. These provisions do not apply to a special school district as established under Section 162.825, RSMo. Districts and charter schools must adopt a policy that defines and prohibits seclusion. This bill is similar to HB 2183 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3503 Modifies the statutory provisions imposing a sales tax on food and authorizes a new business enterprise tax to offset lost revenue
Sponsor Rep. Wick Thomas (D)
Summary
This bill establishes the Business Enterprise Tax Act (Section 143.3000, RSMo). Beginning August 28, 2026, a 0.75% tax must be imposed upon the taxable enterprise value tax base of every business enterprise in Missouri. The revenue generated by such tax must be deposited by the State Treasurer into the School District Trust Fund. To determine the enterprise value tax base, adjustments must be considered based on: (1) For each business enterprise, compensation derived from net earnings from self-employment; (2) For a business enterprise that is a corporation, certain dividends received from another corporation; and (3) For a business enterprise that is not a corporation, certain dividend distributions received from another business enterprise. (4) For a proprietorship, partnership, or limited liability company (LLC), fair and reasonable compensation for the actual personal services of a natural person who is a proprietor, partner, or member to the business organization?s taxable business profits. The amount of this adjustment must not exceed certain amounts. In order to determine the amount of the deductions available to business organizations, and subject to the record-keeping safe harbor described in the bill, certain standards must be used and the business organization must keep records that may be necessary to determine whether the deduction is reasonable. A business organization or group of business organizations may choose to elect to use a record-keeping safe harbor without a redetermination of the deduction. However, upon request, the business organization or group of business organizations must be required to prove an actual personal service was performed for the organization or organizations. A business enterprise claiming a deduction bears the burden of proving that certain actual personal services were provided to the business enterprise during the taxable period (Section 143.3003). A business entity that operates both inside and outside of Missouri and is subject to certain taxes in Missouri or in another state must apportion its enterprise value tax base in order to allocate a fair and equitable portion of the base to Missouri. The portion of the base from compensation, the portion of the base from interest, and the portion of the base from dividends must be apportioned in the manner described in the bill. If the method of apportionment does not fairly represent the business enterprise?s business activity in Missouri, the business entity may petition for, or the Department of Revenue (DOR) may require, the following: (1) The exclusion of one or more apportionment factors; (2) The inclusion of additional apportionment factors; or (3) The employment of another method (Section 143.3006). A business enterprise with gross business receipts that exceed $250,000 or with an enterprise value tax base that exceeds $250,000 must make a return to DOR with the schedule provided in the bill. The business enterprise must also file a declaration of its estimated business enterprise tax for its subsequent taxable period at the end of any quarter when the estimated tax is $260 or more. A business entity that is required to file a declaration must make payments of the estimated tax in certain installments. The bill provides required actions for DOR when: (1) A return shows an overpayment of the tax due; and (2) The Department believes a business enterprise failed to file a return or include part of its enterprise value tax base in the filed return (Section 143.3009). A business organization must file an election with DOR to be a qualified investment company and must file a report that provides certain information. The report or copy of the Federal income tax return must be filed within 30 days following the filing of the Federal income tax return with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). The election allowed in this bill may be terminated by revoking the election by consent of the majority of the members, partners, or shareholders of the investment company or by the manager of the qualified investment company. The election allowed may also be terminated whenever the company no longer satisfies the requirements for qualification (Section 143.3012). A business enterprise must report any change in the amount of compensation, interest, or dividends as determined by the IRS in previous years to DOR. A business enterprise reporting a correction must be given notice by DOR of any adjustment to the tax due resulting from the correction within 6 months after the report is filed. A business enterprise must keep certain records to determine its tax liability, preserve the records for a period of time provided in the bill, and make the records available for inspection by DOR or authorized agents (Section 143.3015). There is currently a sales tax levied and imposed on all retail sales of food. This bill provides that, beginning August 28, 2026, there must no longer be a State sales or use tax levied or imposed on any retail sale of food in Missouri. The bill provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the rate of local sales and use tax imposed on all retail sales of food must be reduced in four equal increments over a four-year period. Beginning January 1, 2031, there must no longer be local sales or use tax levied or imposed on the retail sale of food in Missouri (Section 144.014). This bill is similar to HB 2079 (2026) and SB 57 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3510 Modifies the duties of the state auditor relating to reporting of improper governmental activities
Sponsor Rep. John Martin (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs by a vote of 14 to 1. This bill provides that in instances where a State agency subgrants or allocates public funds to local governments, regional councils of government, other local groups, or private or semiprivate institutions or agencies, the State Auditor will have the authority to examine the books and records of the recipient of the funds to the extent necessary to supervise the receipt and expenditure of public funds and to determine proper use in accordance with State and Federal laws and regulations. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill gives the Auditor power to audit subgrantees; when complaints come in about funding of groups or a vendor working with the department, currently the Auditor has to spend time and resources auditing the whole department but this would let him audit the specific group, vendor, or program in question; this is more efficient and lets them better investigate complaints coming in from the whistleblower hotline. This will be more efficient with resources; the sponsor has been working with the Auditor?s office. Currently, if a whistleblower submits a complaint on a subgrantee, the Auditor sends an investigative letter to the State agency; with this bill, they would not need to audit the entire program, but look into just one subgrantee. This would be if they think there is just one bad actor, the Auditor could still conduct a full audit if they think there are bigger issues within the program or department. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Martin; Arnie Dienoff; and Brandon Alexander, Missouri State Auditors Office. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/14/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HB3511 Modifies provisions relating to charter schools
Sponsor Rep. Doug Clemens (D)
Summary
Currently, a charter school is defined as an independent public school operated in a specified district. Entities that are eligible to sponsor charter schools are also specified. This bill instead defines a charter school as a semi-autonomous public school that may be operated in any school district, sponsored only by the school board of the district or by a special administrative board for the district. The bill will not, however, affect charter contracts that are in effect on the effective date of this bill until the expiration of the contract. Currently, a charter school must select the method for election of officers based on the class of corporation selected. As specified in this bill, the method for election of officers of the charter school will be mutually agreed to by the charter and sponsoring school board. The bill also repeals provisions relating to the expenses associated with sponsorship of charter schools, and specifies that the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will monitor each school board's sponsorship and ensure that the school board meets certain requirements. Currently, the Department is permitted to withhold a sponsor's funding if the sponsor is found to be in material noncompliance with its sponsorship duties. This bill repeals this provision. If the State Board of Education removes the authority to sponsor a currently operating charter school, the State Board, rather than the Missouri Charter Public School Commission, will become the sponsor of the school for the remainder of the term of the charter contract. The State and the sponsoring district will not be liable for any outstanding liability or obligations of the charter school (Section 160.400, RSMo). The bill repeals provisions setting forth the application and approval process for charter school sponsors, and instead specifies that the Department must exercise sponsorship oversight and monitoring to ensure that local school districts only sponsor charter schools that meet criteria specified in the bill, and do so by way of a procedure that complies with the process specified in the bill (Section 160.403). Any person, group, or organization seeking to establish a charter school must submit the proposed charter to the local school board or special administrative board, rather than to a charter sponsor. The bill repeals the provision requiring a charter to include a legally binding performance contract that outlines the obligations and responsibilities of the school and sponsor, and also repeals all contract requirements. Instead, a charter must include a contract that outlines the responsibilities of the school to provide students with a free, accessible, non- sectarian, quality education that is delivered subject to the same basic safeguards and standards as other district schools, including certain standards specified in the bill. Each charter must not exceed five years. A charter school may be approved, as specified in this bill, only if the sponsor determines the charter is both necessary to meet the needs of students in the district and will meet those needs in a manner that improves the local public school system. Charter schools may be authorized or expanded only after a district has assessed the impact of the proposed charter school on local public school resources, programs and services, and other elements specified in the bill. The impact analysis will be independent, developed with community input, and be publicly available. If a proposed charter is denied by a sponsor, the charter may be submitted to the State Board to consider appeals of approvals or denials on the grounds that the sponsor's process for approving a charter was not properly followed, or that the approval or denial was arbitrary or illegal. The bill repeals current provisions specifying charter school requirements, and charter school sponsor requirements. The charter of a charter school may be amended by mutual agreement of the governing body of the charter school and the sponsor, rather than at the request of the governing body and upon approval of the sponsor. The bill also repeals provisions relating to when the sponsor and governing board will review the school's performance, management and operations, and requires the sponsor and governing board to do so as specified in the charter contract. The bill repeals provisions requiring the Department to calculate an annual performance report for each charter school, and requiring the Joint Committee on Education to create a committee to investigate facility access and affordability of charter schools (Section 160.405). This bill repeals all provisions relating to high-quality charter schools (Section 160.408). A charter school must enroll, as specified in this bill, all pupils residing in the district in which it operates as provided in the contract, provided that charter schools operating under contracts in effect on the effective date of this section may enroll pupils as specified in the charter and contract in effect on the effective date of this bill. The bill repeals provisions establishing requirements for the admissions process in current law, as well as provisions requiring charter school students who have been enrolled for a full academic year to be counted in the performance of the charter school on statewide assessments. This bill further repeals the provision requiring a charter school to make available a copy of any contract between a charter school and an educational management company (Section 160.410). Provisions relating to State aid for workplace charter schools are repealed in this bill, in addition to certain provisions specifying the amount of State aid charter schools can receive from the Department. Any dispute between the school district and a charter school as to the amount owed to the charter school will be resolved as specified in the contract, rather than by the Department. This bill prohibits a charter school from being operated by a management company or any entity other than the charter school board and the chief administrative officer, and repeals provisions specifying the requirements for proposal requests (Section 160.415). Provisions allowing the Department to obtain information regarding the financial condition of a charter school, and outlining the determination for whether a charter school will be identified as experiencing financial stress are repealed under this bill. A sponsor will be required to promptly notify the governing board of a charter school if the school is experiencing financial stress. Currently, a sponsor is required to notify the board by November first. Upon receiving such notification, the charter school and sponsor must mutually agree to a revised budget and education plan meeting certain requirements specified in the bill. Provisions allowing a sponsor to make suggestions to improve a plan are repealed, along with provisions allowing the Department to withhold any payment aid due to a charter school until compliance with current law (Section 160.417). Currently, a charter school is allowed to employ non-certificated instructional personnel provided certain conditions are met. This bill repeals such provision and requires a charter school to employ certificated personnel under the same requirements applicable to instructional personnel of the district (Section 160.420). As specified in this bill, the Missouri Charter Public School Commission will be prohibited from approving or renewing any charter for sponsorship on or after the effective date of this bill. The Commission will be abolished 30 days after the date of the last expiration of existing charter contracts effective on the effective date of this bill for charter schools sponsored by the Commission on the effective date of this bill (Section 160.425). This bill is similar to HB 405 (2025)
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3526 Modifies provisions relating to the local senior citizen homestead property tax credit
Sponsor Rep. Tonya Rush (D)
Summary
Currently, Missouri taxpayers who meet the following criteria are eligible for the Homestead Property Tax Credit for seniors: (1) Are at least 62 years old; (2) Are the owner of record of a qualifying homestead; and (3) Are liable for payment of real property taxes on such homestead. This bill changes that criteria by increasing the qualifying minimum age from 62 years old to 65 years old . The bill also adds to the criteria by requiring a Missouri taxpayer to either: (1) Have a combined household Missouri adjusted gross income that does not exceed $75,000; or (2) Be a recipient of certain public assistance benefits. Currently, any county that is authorized to impose a property tax has the option to grant the Homestead Property Tax Credit for qualifying seniors. This bill requires such counties to grant the Homestead Property Tax Credit to qualifying seniors. The bill also requires counties to: (1) Create a simple application; (2) Maintain records related to eligible taxpayers and credits granted; and (3) Notify eligible taxpayers each year of their continued participation and eligibility. This bill requires the State to reimburse any political subdivision of Missouri for any decrease in revenue due to the provisions of this bill. This bill is similar to HB 3253 (2026).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HB3530 Creates new provisions for utilities
Sponsor Rep. Bishop Davidson (R)
Summary
This bill creates the "Missouri Home Battery and Grid Resilience Act", which requires each electrical corporation, within 90 days after the effective date of the bill, to file with the Public Service Commission a "Residential Battery and Grid Resilience Program". Each program must provide customer incentives for installation of eligible battery energy storage systems located behind the customer meter; require enrollment of the system in a utility- approved grid services tariff for a minimum term of five years; and allow ownership of the battery energy storage system by the customer, a third-party lessor, or an approved aggregator. Each participating utility must offer certain incentives as specified in the bill. A minimum 20% state-of-charge reserve must be maintained for customer backup during dispatch events. Incentive payments must be made upon verification of installation and enrollment in the grid services tariff. All prudently incurred program costs must be recorded to a regulatory asset on the utility?s books and be recoverable through an amortization of the regulatory asset balance in each of the utility?s general rate proceedings over a reasonable period of time. The Commission must ensure the program meets certain requirements. Utilities can use Federal funds, grants, or private contributions to cover incentives, program administration, or measurement and verification costs. General revenue or taxpayer funds cannot be used to implement this Section. Utilities must verify available capacity and dispatched energy through interval metering or certified telemetry. Each utility must file an annual report with the Commission summarizing certain information specified in the bill. Residential customers participating in a program are entitled to certain rights and protections specified in the bill. The Commission, in consultation with the Energy Division of the Department of Natural Resources, must establish and administer a statewide licensing program for solar and energy storage contractors operating within the State. Any person applying for a license must complete an application created by the Commission and the Department and pay a licensing fee of $500 for initial licensing and $250 for biennial renewal. The Commission, in coordination with the Department, must maintain a public online registry of all licensed solar and energy storage as specified in the bill. License holders must comply with certain requirements. The Commission may suspend, fine, or revoke licenses for fraudulent or deceptive practices, unsafe installations, or failure to comply with specified requirements. Fines may not exceed $5,000 per violation, plus restitution to affected customers. Contractors holding active NABCEP certification and operating in Missouri prior to implementation of this program may receive provisional licensing within 180 days. Out-of-state firms may apply for reciprocal licensing if holding equivalent credentials and experience.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/16/2026
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 3/23/26 - 4:30 pm or Upon Adjournment - HR 7 - House-Emerging Issues

HB3532 Requires the general assembly to create educational resources for civic education in Missouri
Sponsor Rep. Brad Pollitt (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education by a vote of 16 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HBs 3532 & 3483. This bill instructs the General Assembly to create education materials to used to educate children. The materials will detail the legislative process in Missouri. Materials may include, but are not limited to, real world experiences, publications, reasonable accommodations for place-based learning, opportunities for civic engagement, and digital resources. This bill is similar to HB 3483 (2026) The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that it is important to learn about government so that future generations do not make the same mistakes. The more you know as a child the better and having early learning will help children develop into a well-informed citizen. Educators that are responsible for 3rd grade learning standards will appreciate having additional tools that can help students to become engaged citizens. The inclusion of teachers, students, and fellow educators on this project would be useful. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Pollitt; Joy Bess; Activate Missouri; Liam Neale; Edgar Connolly; Frankie Soetaert; and Ann Alofs. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that as a matter of civic discourse having a variety of opinions is important. Testifying in person against the bill was Brian Keller, Missouri Civic Learning Coalition. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/21/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

HB3543 Authorizes counties to adopt a real property homestead tax exemption for certain disabled veterans
Sponsor Rep. Michael Johnson (D)
Summary
This bill provides that for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, a county must grant an annual exemption for a qualified residence of a disabled veteran in an amount equal to the greater of $32,500 or the maximum amount that may be granted to a disabled veteran under 38 U.S.C. Section 2102, from all ad valorem taxation assessed on the qualified residence. The value of all property in excess of the exempted amount will remain subject to taxation. The disabled veteran must have: (1) Served on active duty or state active duty as a member of the Armed Forces of the United States, the National Guard, or the United States Reserve Forces; (2) Been discharged under honorable conditions; and (3) Been adjudicated by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as having a service-related disability that renders such veteran as being 100% totally disabled or as being less than 100% totally disabled but is compensated at the 100% level due to individual unemployability or is entitled to receive a statutory award from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs for: (a) Loss or permanent loss of use of one or both feet; (b) Loss or permanent loss of use of one or both hands; (c) Loss of sight in one or both eyes; or (d) Permanent impairment of vision of both eyes. The disabled veteran must be an owner of record and liable for the payment of property taxes on the qualified residence for which the exemption allowed under this section is claimed. This exemption can carry over to the disabled veteran's surviving spouse as long as the spouse holds the legal or beneficial title to the qualified residence, permanently resides therein, and does not remarry. No exemption will be allowed for a surviving spouse for the tax year in which he or she remarries. The exemption can not be transferred or assigned. All revenues lost resulting from the exemption may be replaced to each taxing authority within a county from a countywide replacement sales tax on all retail sales made within the county that are subject to sales tax. The tax authorized must be imposed by resolution at a rate necessary to produce the same revenue produced by the tax on the real property exempted in the previous year, and will be imposed solely for the same purposes as the property tax was imposed. The tax authorized will be in addition to all other sales taxes imposed by law, and will be stated separately from all other charges and taxes. The tax exemption and the replacement tax will not become effective unless the governing body of the county submits to the voters residing within the county at a state general, primary, or special election a proposal to authorize the governing body to impose the exemption and the replacement tax. This bill creates the "Veterans Homestead Property Tax Replacement Sales Tax Fund", which is a trust fund under the direction of the Director of the Department of Revenue on behalf of the county, except for 1% for the cost of collection that shall be deposited into the State's General Revenue Fund. Moneys in this Fund shall not be deemed as State funds, and shall not be commingled with any funds of the State. If the replacement tax is repealed or terminated by any means, all funds remaining in the Special Trust Fund shall continue to be used solely for the designated purposes with some specifications listed in the bill. The provisions of this bill will sunset six years after the effective date. This bill is similar to HB 2362 (2026)and HB 921 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR105 Proposes a constitutional amendment exempting from taxation certain real and personal property owned by former prisoners of war, veterans with a total service-connected disability, and Purple Heart recipients
Sponsor Rep. Matthew Overcast (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment authorizes an exemption from property tax for the real and personal property of a veteran with a total service-connected disability or a veteran recipient of a Purple Heart. This bill is similar to HJR 96 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR108 Proposes a constitutional amendment to prohibit any new tax or increase in tax from going into effect unless approved by the voters in a general election
Sponsor Rep. Brian Seitz (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment proposes that no new tax or tax increase imposed by state statute will go into effect, or continue in effect if otherwise set to expire, without prior approval at a statewide general election. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Constitution, this resolution further proposes that no State funds will be expended without first being appropriated by the General Assembly. This bill is similar to HJR 8 (2025)and HJR 84 (2024).
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Read Second Time

HJR111 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to property tax
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Coleman (R)
Summary
Currently, the State's Constitution requires rollbacks in property tax levies in certain situations. However, the Kansas City Public Schools are exempt from this provision. Upon voter approval, this proposed constitutional amendment would remove the Kansas City Public Schools exemption. Beginning January 1, 2027, the operating levy of the Kansas City Public School District must be set to the rate at which the school district would receive: (1) The same amount of property tax revenue that it received in the 2026 tax year; and (2) An additional percentage of property tax revenue that is to be calculated by multiplying the amount of the revenue received in the 2026 tax year by the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index over the 12-month period from December 2025 to November 2026. This resolution provides ballot language for the proposed amendment. This bill is similar to HJR 116 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
H - Superseded by HB HJR 148

HJR112 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to residential real property tax assessments
Sponsor Rep. Jeff Coleman (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, beginning January 1, 2027, this proposed constitutional amendment provides that the true value of all residential real property that has been maintained by the homeowner as his or her primary residence will be deemed to be the same value determined at the most recent previous assessment of the property. In a new assessment or reassessment of the primary residence the assessed valuation of such property can be increased, provided that the increase does not exceed the change in the Consumer Price Index or 2%, whichever is less. The limited increase can be exceeded to reflect the value added to the property as a result of new construction or improvements. This bill is similar to HCS HJR 4 (2025); HCS#2 HJR 78 (2024); and SJR 90 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR113 Proposes a constitutional amendment granting homestead and personal property tax exemptions to certain veterans proportional to the veteran's disability rating
Sponsor Rep. Mike Costlow (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, beginning January 1, 2027, this constitutional amendment allows all real property used as a homestead, as defined by law, and all personal property, of any resident who is a veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States or the Missouri National Guard and who has a service- connected disability rating to be partially or totally exempt from a taxation, proportional to the veteran's disability rating. This bill is similar to HJR 64 (2025) and HJR 95 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR114 Proposes a constitutional amendment to assert the right of parents to participate in and direct the education of their children free from government interference
Sponsor Rep. Mike Costlow (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment provides that the government must not deny or infringe upon a parent's fundamental right to participate in and direct the education of his or her child including, but not limited to, the right to home school or otherwise educate a child outside of the public school system free from government regulation, regardless of whether the parent receives financial assistance from the government for purposes of educating a child and the right to access the curricula and lesson plans of the public school and school district in which a child is enrolled. This bill is similar to SJR 6 and HJR 81 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Elementary and Secondary Education

HJR115 Proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing a disabled veteran homestead exemption
Sponsor Rep. Dave Griffith (R)
Summary
HCS HJR 115 -- PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTIONS (Griffith) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Special Committee on Tax Reform Currently, all real property used as a homestead of any citizen of this State who is a former prisoner of war and who has a total service-connected disability, is exempt from taxation. Upon voter approval, this proposed constitutional amendment would exempt all real property used as a homestead, as defined in the resolution, from taxation for any military veteran who is a resident of this State and has a 100% service-connected disability as determined by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and any military veteran who is a citizen of this State and a former prisoner of war. If the 100% disabled veteran is deceased, the surviving spouse can continue using the exemption on the homestead property, provided that the surviving spouse uses, occupies, and maintains the homestead on which the disabled veteran was granted the original exemption. If the exempt homestead is subsequently sold or if the surviving spouse discontinues use of the property as the primary homestead, the exemption will expire. This bill is similar to HJR 6 (2025) and HJR 75 (2024).
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
HJR125 Proposes an amendment to the constitution of Missouri to allow political subdivisions to increase the rate or the purpose of local sales taxes upon approval by the voters
Sponsor Rep. Bill Irwin (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, beginning in 2027, this constitutional amendment would allow political subdivisions granted the power to tax by the Missouri Constitution and by the General Assembly to increase sales taxes without authorization by the General Assembly. Political subdivisions would have to receive voter approval in order to increase any sales tax or to change the purpose of any sales tax authorized by this provision of the Constitution. The ability to tax granted by this resolution would be in addition to any other authorization to tax granted to the political subdivision by the General Assembly. This amendment is similar to HJR 29 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/05/2026

HJR126 Proposes a constitutional amendment that reduces property tax assessments on senior citizens and disabled persons by fifty percent
Sponsor Rep. Marlene Terry (D)
Summary
Upon voter approval, beginning January 1, 2027, this proposed constitutional amendment provides that residential property will be assessed at 50% of the value at which the property would otherwise be assessed if the property owner is: (1) Age 65 years or older; or (2) An individual who is permanently disabled under Federal law or the laws of this state; and (3) Has a Missouri taxable income for the most recently completed income tax year before the date of property tax assessment of $50,000 or less, or $75,000 or less if the taxpayer is married and filing jointly. This amendment is similar to HJR 19 (2025) and HJR 85 (2024).
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
01/08/2026
H - Read Second Time

HJR128 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Sponsor Rep. Bob Titus (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment would automatically require each tax levied and imposed by the State or any political subdivision thereof to be submitted to voters for reauthorization 25 years after the original effective date of the tax. Upon voter approval, the tax would be reauthorized. If voters fail to approve the tax, the proposal or tax could be modified and the question to approve it resubmitted to voters at the next general election. If voters fail to approve the tax a second time, the tax will terminate at the end of the second fiscal year immediately following the election. Ballot summaries for these taxes are prohibited from describing them as not being a tax increase. This amendment would not apply to taxes imposed for the payment of bonds or other debt. This bill is similar to HJR 22 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR129 Proposes a constitutional amendment that Increases the debt limit for school districts
Sponsor Rep. Brad Pollitt (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment increases the debt limit for school districts from 15% to 20% of the value of the district's taxable tangible property. This bill is similar to SJR 58 and HJR 100 (2025) .
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR131 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Sponsor Rep. Don Mayhew (R)
Summary
Currently, certain real and personal property are exempt from taxation. Any county that loses revenue as a result of these exemptions can replace the revenue by imposing a tax on commercial real property within the county's border. If a county chooses to impose such a tax, a majority of voters within the county can decrease the newly imposed tax on commercial real property. Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment allows the governing body of a county to decrease the newly imposed tax on commercial real property. The amendment also applies the provisions of Section 22, Article X of the Missouri Constitution to the newly imposed tax on commercial property. Currently, the calculation of "total state revenues" includes certain revenue, fees, and funds, as defined for fiscal year 1980-1981. This resolution repeals the base year of 1980-1981. Currently, there is a limit on the total amount of taxes which can be imposed in any fiscal year on taxpayers. The limit is calculated by using the total state revenues from fiscal year 1980-1981 and the personal income of Missouri in calendar year 1979. This amendment changes the effective date of implementation from fiscal year 1980-1981 to fiscal year 2027- 2028. The resolution also changes the limiting calculation by using total state revenues from the previous fiscal year before implementation and the personal income of Missouri from the calendar year prior to the previous fiscal year before implementation. Currently, the General Assembly must not increase taxes or fees without voter approval if the taxes or fees in total produce new annual revenues of a certain amount. This resolution repeals the definition of "new annual revenues". Instead, the amendment measures individual tax or fee increases by the increase in total state revenues collected during the first fiscal year following enactment. If a tax or fee change is to be implemented over multiple years, the increase in total state revenues from the first fiscal year following enactment will be used to extrapolate the total increase in revenues once fully implemented, and this result will be used for the compliance measurement for the year the General Assembly approved the tax or fee increase. This resolution requires voter approval before any tax increase imposed by state statute can go into effect or for any existing tax imposed by statute to continue. During the general election of 2028, or at a special election called by the Governor, the voters must be asked the following question: "Shall the taxes imposed in (list of Articles and Sections imposing a tax) of this Constitution expire?" If a majority of the qualified voters answer in favor of the question, the listed taxes will expire at the end of the second fiscal year after the election is held. If a majority answers no, the listed taxes will not expire and must remain effective unless and until the questions are resubmitted. Additionally, if a majority answers no, the Secretary of State must resubmit the question at the general election every four years thereafter until the termination of the taxes is approved. This bill is similar to HJR 22 (2025) and HJR 126 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR132 Proposes a constitutional amendment that exempts buildings under construction from property taxation
Sponsor Rep. Don Mayhew (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment exempts buildings and other similar structures that are considered under construction from property taxation. The term ?Under construction? is defined in the amendment.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Special Committee on Property Tax Reform

HJR137 Proposes a constitutional amendment that adds employees of school districts to the list of allowed employment for members of the general assembly
Sponsor Rep. Mark Sharp (D)
Summary
Currently, members of the General Assembly are prohibited from holding employment with the United States, the State of Missouri, or any municipality thereof. Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment permits members of the General Assembly to hold employment with a school district. This resolution is similar to HJR 34 (2025)and HJR 96 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR138 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to property tax exemptions for certain disabled veterans
Sponsor Rep. Bill Lucas (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment expands the current exemption from real property taxes for former prisoners of war with a total service-connected disability to all disabled veterans, as defined in the amendment. If the disabled veteran dies, the surviving spouse will continue to receive the exemption, provided that the surviving spouse uses, occupies, and maintains the real property that the disabled veteran was granted the original exemption as his or her homestead and the property is not sold. If the surviving spouse sells the homestead or relocates so that the real property is no longer used as a homestead by the surviving spouse, the exemption will expire. This bill is similar to SJR 46 (2025) and HJR 6 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR139 Proposes a constitutional amendment that authorizes a real property tax exemption for certain senior citizens
Sponsor Rep. Bill Lucas (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment authorizes a real property tax exemption for qualifying senior citizens. The General Assembly can, by law, exempt a portion of the assessed valuation of the real property occupied by the qualifying owner or owners if that qualifying owner has a Missouri adjusted gross income of $100,000 or less, or $150,000 or less if combined. If the qualifying senior citizen dies, the real property tax exemption will extend to the surviving spouse if the spouse is 55 years of age or older, has been a Missouri resident for at least 10 consecutive years, and maintains the same residence. The General Assembly must monitor the cost of exemptions each year to adjust caps, income limits, and other criteria. The General Assembly must establish a clear procedure for verification, exemption claims, and audits to ensure compliance. Any restitution to the respective political subdivisions of revenues lost can be partially offset by the State. This amendment is similar to HJR 42 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR141 Modifies provisions relating property assessment equalization power of the state tax commission
Sponsor Rep. Dean Van Schoiack (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the powers of the State Tax Commission relating to appeals from local boards of equalization on assessed valuation of real or tangible personal property are limited. This amendment limits the Commission to: (1) Upholding the decision of the local board of equalization; (2) Upholding the original assessed valuation; or (3) Lowering the assessed valuation of the real or tangible personal property. The Commission is prohibited from raising such assessed valuation. The amendment provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the Commission must provide each county with a list that identifies real or personal property found to be above or below its true value in money and out of compliance with Commission standards.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR143 Proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing counties to exempt eligible motor vehicles from personal property taxes
Sponsor Rep. Mike Jones (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment authorizes the exemption of eligible personal motor vehicles from personal property taxes for counties that opt into such an exemption.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/28/2026
H - Public hearing completed - House-Local Government

HJR144 Proposes a constitutional amendment granting homestead and personal property tax exemptions to certain veterans proportional to the veteran's disability rating
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, beginning January 1, 2027, this constitutional amendment allows all real property used as a homestead, as defined by law, and all personal property, of any resident who is a veteran of the Armed Forces of the United States or the Missouri National Guard and who has a service- connected disability rating to be partially or totally exempt from taxation, proportional to the veteran's disability rating. This bill is similar to HJR 64 (2025) and HJR 95 (2024).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR146 Modifies provisions relating to the renaming of the state tax commission
Sponsor Rep. Tim Taylor (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment changes the name of the State Tax Commission to the State Assessment Commission.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR147 Proposes a constitutional amendment establishing funding for pensions for the blind
Sponsor Rep. Tim Taylor (R)
Summary
Currently, Missouri imposes a state property tax for the purpose of funding the Blind Pension Fund. Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment removes this tax and requires the General Assembly to provide an annual appropriation for the purpose of funding the Blind Pension Fund. This appropriated amount each year must be at least the same amount the General Assembly appropriated to fund the Blind Pension Fund during the 2026-2027 fiscal year.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026

HJR148 Proposes a constitutional amendment modifying provisions relating to taxation of real property
Sponsor Rep. Tim Taylor (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 14 to 3. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HJRs 148 & 111. Currently, Missouri's Constitution requires rollbacks in property tax levies in certain situations. However, the Kansas City Public Schools are exempt from this provision. Upon voter approval, this proposed constitutional amendment would expire the Kansas City Public Schools exemption on December 31, 2026. Beginning January 1, 2027, the operating levy of the Kansas City Public School District must be set to $4.9599 per $100 of assessed valuation. Beginning January 1, 2028, the operating levy of the Kansas City Public School District must be subject to adjustments as provided in Article X of the Missouri Constitution and all applicable statutes governing property taxes and school district operating levies. Currently, taxes imposed for the payment of bonds, indebtedness, and contracts are exempt from the levy limitation imposed on operating levies. This amendment repeals this exemption. The levy limitations imposed on operating levies will apply to levies imposed for the payment of bonds, indebtedness, and contracts. Currently, new construction and improvements are excluded from the calculation of the assessed valuation of property as it relates to the levy limitation of the Hancock amendment. This amendment provides that new construction and improvements must be included in this calculation of the assessed valuation. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the bill ensures the Kansas City Public Schools can be subject to the Hancock Amendment without needing to rollback to a previously lower tax levy. Those in support of the bill state that Kansas City Public Schools wants to get to the point where it is adjusting its property tax levies in the same way as other school districts in Missouri. Supporters of the bill say this is good for taxpayers in the Kansas City School District boundaries. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Taylor; Dan Hutton, State Ombudsman - State Tax Commission; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that Kansas City Public Schools planned to put the tax rate on the ballot on its own, but this bill is another mandate by the state to Kansas City Public Schools. Opponents state this bill will force Kansas City Public Schools to set a lower property tax levy, which will harm the educational system for Kansas City Public Schools and local charter schools. Those who oppose the bill say it will create issues at the state and local level by including new construction and improvements in the calculation of assessed valuation. Opponents also say debt service is already limited in other ways. Testifying in person against the bill were Richard Sheets, Missouri Municipal League; Shana Long, Kansas City Public Schools; Dr. Jennifer Collier, Kansas City Public Schools; and Mike Lodewegen, Missouri Council of School Administrators. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/17/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Legislative

HJR150 Proposes a constitutional amendment modifying provisions governing the taxation of real property
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
Currently, if the assessed valuation of property, excluding the value of new construction and improvements, increases by a larger percentage than the increase in the general price level from the previous year, the maximum authorized current levy applied must be reduced to yield the same gross revenue from the property. This limitation does not apply to taxes imposed that are related to bonds or indebtedness. Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment repeals the exclusion of property taxation related to bonds or indebtedness. This amendment also provides that, if the total assessed valuation of real property increases by a larger percentage than the percentage increase in the general price level from the previous year, the increase in the total assessed valuation must be limited to the percentage increase in the general price level from the previous year. If the total assessed valuation increases by less than the general price level from the previous year, there must be no increase in the total assessed valuation when equalized. The calculation of total assessed valuation of real property no longer excludes the value of new construction. The amendment provides that, if the assessed valuation of a subclass of real property increases by any percentage over the previous year, the maximum authorized current levy applied to the subclass must be reduced to yield the same gross revenue from existing real property in the subclass that could have been collected at the existing levy on the prior assessed value. However, the county or political subdivision may adjust the reduction to account for changes to the general price level. If a political subdivision needs to increase the current levy applied to a particular subclass of real property to yield the same gross revenue as would had been collected at the existing levy on the prior assessed value of the subclass, the political subdivision must submit the question to the voters on the next general election day.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR151 Proposes a constitutional amendment allowing a personal property tax exemption
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment authorizes the General Assembly to provide methods for a county or the City of St. Louis to eliminate the assessment and taxation of tangible personal property, if such an elimination is approved by the qualified voters of the city or county.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR152 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to real property tax assessments
Sponsor Rep. Will Jobe (D)
Summary
Upon voter approval, beginning January 1, 2027, this proposed constitutional amendment provides that the true value in money for the assessment of residential real property that has been maintained by the homeowner as his or her primary residence must be deemed to be the same value determined at the most recent previous assessment of the property. The proposed constitutional amendment also provides that the assessed valuation of such residential real property can be increased by no more than 5% each year from the assessed valuation of the property determined at its most recent previous assessment. The assessed valuation can be increased by more than 5% under the following circumstances: (1) The increase reflects the value added to the residential real property as a result of new construction or improvements made to the property as determined by the county appraisal system; or (2) The increase reflects the true market value of the residential real property after it has been transferred or sold through legal means. In this circumstance, the true value in money must reflect the true market value of the residential property for the first new assessment or reassessment year of such property under this new ownership before the above limitation on increases apply to such property. The provisions in this subsection must not affect the ability of an assessor to decrease the assessed value of any residential real property. This bill is similar to HJR 89 (2025).
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR162 Requires a twenty percent voter turnout for certain property tax elections
Sponsor Rep. Darin Chappell (R)
Summary
This bill requires any election on a question that raises property taxes, authorizes a bond that is funded by property taxes, or reauthorizes an existing property tax to be voted on by at least 20% of the voters eligible to vote on the question and to receive a majority of the votes cast on the question, in order to pass.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR163 Proposes a constitutional amendment repealing the requirement that taxes shall be payable during the fiscal year or calendar year in which property is assessed
Sponsor Rep. Tricia Byrnes (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment would repeal an existing provision of the Missouri Constitution requiring all property taxes to be payable during the fiscal or calendar year in which the property was assessed.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026

HJR164 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Sponsor Rep. Bishop Davidson (R)
Summary
This resolution provides that state and local sales and use taxes may be expanded by legislation to impose taxes on transactions involving any goods or services for the purpose of reducing and eliminating the State resident individual income tax. Any increase in tax or revenue due to legislation aiming to reduce and eliminate the State individual income tax must be exempt from certain provisions of the Missouri Constitution that are related to state tax limitations.
Progress
House: Filed
Last Action
02/27/2026
H - Withdrawn

HJR165 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Sponsor Rep. Jonathan Patterson (R)
Summary
This resolution provides that state and local sales and use taxes may be expanded by legislation to impose taxes on transactions involving any goods or services for the purpose of reducing and eliminating the State resident individual income tax. Any increase in tax or revenue due to legislation aiming to reduce and eliminate the State individual income tax must be exempt from certain provisions of the Missouri Constitution that are related to state tax limitations.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR169 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to restrictions on state revenue
Sponsor Rep. Jim Murphy (R)
Summary
HCS HJR 169 -- STATE REVENUE (Murphy) COMMITTEE OF ORIGIN: Standing Committee on Ways and Means Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment establishes the "Taxpayer Protection Act". The provisions of this amendment must be in addition to the limits, requirements, and other provisions of the Hancock Amendment. Other limits on district revenue, spending, and debt must only be modified by future voter approval. This amendment provides further provisions related to individual or class action enforcement suits. The amendment provides that, when annual district revenue is less than annual payments on certain general obligations, certain requirements for districts must be suspended to address the deficiency. This amendment provides that ballot issues brought under certain requirements must be decided in a regularly scheduled state general election, general municipal or local district election, or on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of odd-numbered years. Any district, as defined in the amendment, may consolidate certain ballot issues and voters may approve a delay of up to four years in voting on ballot issues. At least 30 days before a ballot issue election brought under the requirements of the amendment, the district must mail a title notice or set of notices addressed to all registered voters at each address of one or more active registered electors. Title notices must have a certain order of preference and must include certain information. Among other requirements, the title notices must include district estimates of the maximum dollar amount of each tax increase and of the district's fiscal year spending without the increase for the first full fiscal year of each proposed tax increase. Except by later voter approval, if a tax increase or fiscal year spending exceeds any such district estimates, the tax increase must be reduced by up to 100% in proportion to the combined dollar excess, and the combined excess revenue must be refunded in the next fiscal year. This excludes emergency tax revenue. For proposed district bonded debt, title notices must also include information related to the principal amount, the principal balance and repayment costs. The district's bonded debt must not be issued on terms that could exceed its share of the maximum repayment costs. Ballot titles for tax or bonded debt increases must include specified language. With two exceptions, as specified in the amendment, a district must have voter approval in advance for any: 1) New tax; 2) Tax rate increase; 3) Mill levy above the rate of the prior year; 4) Valuation for assessment ratio increase for a property class; 5) Extension of an expiring tax; or 6) Tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain to any district; and 7) Creation of multi-fiscal-year direct or indirect district debt or financial obligation without adequate cash reserves Each district must reserve a certain amount of its fiscal year spending, not including bond debt service, for fiscal year 2028, fiscal year 2029, and every fiscal year thereafter to be only used during declared emergencies. This amendment prohibits emergency property taxes. Emergency taxes must be spent on specified conditions. The maximum annual percentage change in state fiscal year spending, the maximum annual percentage change in each local district?s fiscal year spending, and the maximum annual percentage change in each local district?s property tax revenue must be calculated as specified in the amendment. The calculations for maximum annual percentage change in state fiscal year spending, local district?s fiscal year spending, and local district?s property tax revenue are to be adjusted by voter- approved revenue changes. The calculations for the maximum annual percentage change in a local district?s fiscal year spending and local district?s property tax revenue are to also be adjusted by certain reductions specified in the amendment. These calculations exclude emergency tax revenue. If revenue exceeds these maximums for a given fiscal year, the excess must be refunded in the next fiscal year unless voters approve a revenue change as an offset. The amendment sets the initial district bases to the current fiscal year spending and property tax collected for tax year 2025. The district bases and limitations to spending and property tax revenue are adjusted by enterprise status and changes to bonded debt. Certain changes are exceptions to and separate from any district base. This amendment provides that additional surcharges and fees must not be implemented for the sole purpose of avoiding limits under the provisions of this amendment. If there are additional revenues from these sources, they must be included in the calculation of the spending limit. The amendment provides that, if a local district adopts or has adopted a tax abatement, such local district must add the amount of such abatement into its revenue calculation. This amendment prohibits new or increased transfer tax rates on real property, new state real property taxes, and new local district income taxes. The amendment provides that neither an income tax rate increase nor a new state definition of taxable income can be applied before the next tax year. This amendment requires valuation notices to be mailed annually and allows such valuations to be appealed annually. Additionally, property tax bills and valuation notices must include the actual value, as specified in the amendment. The amendment provides that, with exceptions as specified in the amendment, a local district is allowed to reduce or end its subsidy to any program delegated to it by the General Assembly for administration. The General Assembly may enact laws to implement the provisions of this amendment.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Reported Do Pass - Senate-Fiscal Oversight

HJR171 Proposes a constitutional amendment authorizing school districts to include governmental entity property owned for development or redevelopment purposes in calculations of assessed valuation for school district indebtedness purposes
Sponsor Rep. Bill Falkner (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Legislative Review by a vote of 7 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for HJR 171. This constitutional amendment, if adopted, would amend Article VI of the Missouri Constitution to allow school districts to include property owned by a governmental entity used for development or redevelopment purposes in the calculation of assessed valuation for determining the limitation cap on school district indebtedness. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this resolution would allow school districts to borrow more money against their bonding, changing it from just municipalities to all government entities. Testifying in person for the bill were Representative Falkner; and Stifel. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/03/2026
H - Reported Do Pass as substituted - House-Legislative Review

HJR173 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Sponsor Rep. Bishop Davidson (R)
Summary
SS SCS HCS HJRs 173 & 174 -- TAXATION Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment requires the General Assembly to enact legislation to reduce and eliminate the state individual income tax by reducing the top rate of the individual income tax based on revenue growth until the tax is eliminated. Upon elimination of the individual income tax, the General Assembly is prohibited from enacting or imposing any State individual income tax. Currently, state and local sales and use taxes, or similar transaction-based taxes, may not be expanded to impose taxes on any service or transaction that was not subject to sales, use, or similar transaction-based tax on January 1, 2015. The amendment provides that the General Assembly may authorize the expansion of sales and use taxes to transactions involving any goods and services for the purpose of reducing and eliminating the state individual incoming tax and the reducing of local tax rates but only if the same legislation reduces the top rate of the state individual income tax by an amount that is at least substantially equal to the revenues generate by the expansion of the sales and use tax or increase in the state sales and use tax rate. If such legislation is enacted within five years of the effective date of this amendment, it shall not be considered new annual revenue for the purposes specified in the amendment. Beginning 12 months after the effective date of any law expanding the sales and use tax base, any political subdivision that imposes a sales and use tax must adjust one or more specified tax rates or levies to reduce revenue generated in an amount equal to 97% of the additional revenue produced by the expansion. Beginning 12 months after the effective date of any law expanding the sales and use tax base, each sales and use tax rate imposed directly by the Missouri Constitution, except the rate imposed under Article XIV of the Missouri Constitution, must be reduced in the manner provided by law to offset the additional revenue generated by the expansion, as determined by the State Auditor. The amendment includes ballot language for this proposed constitutional amendment.
Progress
Governor
Last Action
04/23/2026
G - Delivered to the Secretary of State

HJR174 Proposes a constitutional amendment relating to taxation
Sponsor Rep. Jonathan Patterson (R)
Summary
This constitutional amendment provides that, if all revenue triggers established by law to reduce and eliminate the current individual income tax are met and the top individual income tax rate is reduced below 1.4%, no state individual income tax will be imposed beginning January 1, 2031. The amendment authorizes state and local sales and use taxes to be expanded by legislation to impose taxes on transactions involving any goods or services for the purpose of reducing and eliminating the state resident individual income tax. Beginning July 1, 2029, this amendment requires any political subdivision that imposes a sales or use tax to adjust one or more of the following to reduce the amount of revenue generated to a level described in the bill: (1) Sales or use tax rate; (2) Any personal property tax levy; (3) Residential real property tax levy; or (4) Any earnings tax. Beginning July 1, 2029, the amendment requires each sales and use tax rate imposed by the Missouri Constitution to be adjusted as specified in the bill. By July 1, 2028, the state auditor must determine such reduced rates that will go into effect January 1, 2029. This amendment exempts any tax or revenue increase from legislation enacted to reduce and eliminate the state individual income tax within a set time from the requirements of certain limitations provided in the Missouri Constitution. The resolution provides ballot language for this proposed constitutional amendment.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/04/2026
H - Superseded by HJR 173

HJR178 Creates new requirements for the general assembly when regulating local governments
Sponsor Rep. Don Mayhew (R)
Summary
Upon voter approval, this constitutional amendment requires any bill introduced by the General Assembly that creates or modifies a local mandate to include a local government fiscal impact statement. The statement must identify the categories of local governments affected, estimate the anticipated cost to each, and identify the source and sufficiency of any proposed State funding or support. This amendment prevents any bill affected by this requirement from being voted out of committee prior to the public availability of the fiscal impact statement. The amendment provides that no local government is required to implement or administer a local mandate unless State funding has been made available to the local government. If funding is not appropriated or insufficient, a local government can suspend the mandate. This amendment also places several requirements on any State law requiring local administration, as provided in the resolution.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

HJR179 Proposes a constitutional amendment exempting individuals who are 65 years of age or older from personal property taxation
Sponsor Rep. Deanna Self (R)
Summary
This resolution exempts all tangible personal property owned by an individual who is at least 65 years old from any State or local tangible personal property tax.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Referred to committee - House-Emerging Issues

SB836 Modifies provisions relating to elections
Sponsor Sen. Sandy Crawford (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 836 - This act modifies various provisions relating to elections.NOTICES OF ELECTION (Section 115.125)The act allows a notice of election to be sent by email.This provision is substantially similar to a provision in SCS/SB 182 (2025), SB 926 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 1525 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 2140 (2024), and a provision in HCS/HB 2895 (2024).CANDIDATE FILING DEADLINES - LOCAL OFFICES(Section 115.127)Under current law, the period for filing a declaration of candidacy in certain political subdivisions and special districts is from 8:00 a.m. on the 17th Tuesday prior to the election until 5:00 p.m. on the 14th Tuesday prior to the election. This act changes that period to 8:00 a.m. on the 16th Tuesday prior to the election until 5:00 p.m. on the 13th Tuesday prior to the election, unless the 13th Tuesday prior to an election falls on a holiday, then the closing of filing shall be at 5:00 p.m. on the next day that is not a holiday.This provision is identical to a provision in SCS/SB 182 (2025), SB 774 (2024), a provision in SB 926 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 1525 (2024), HB 1604 (2024), a provision in SCS/HB 2084 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 2140 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 2206 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 2895 (2024), a provision in SCS/SB 346 (2023), and CCS/HS/HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 96 (2023) and substantially similar to HB 2225 (2024), HCS/HB 1214 (2023), provisions in the perfected HCS/HBs 267 & 347 (2023), and HCS/HB 783 (2023).TESTING OF ELECTION EQUIPMENT(Section 115.233)Current law requires, in any election in which an electronic voting system is to be used, an election authority to have the automatic tabulating equipment tested within 14 days prior to the election to ascertain that the equipment is in compliance with the law and that it will correctly count the votes cast for all offices and on all questions. This act changes the timeline for testing such that it must be completed at least 14 days, but no less than one week prior to the election. ABSENTEE VOTING(Sections 115.277 and 115.284)The act allows eligible covered voters to vote absentee by submitting a federal postcard application at the office of the election authority on election day even though the person is not registered. Interstate former residents and new residents may vote by absentee ballot at the office of the election authority on election day for the offices for which such voters are entitled to vote. This provision is identical to a provision in SCS/SB 182 (2025), SB 926 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 1525 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 2140 (2024), and a provision in HCS/HB 2895 (2024).The act provides that all lists of absentee ballot applications for persons with permanent disabilities shall be kept confidential.This provision is identical to provisions in SCS/SB 182 (2025), SB 926 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 1525 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 2140 (2024), and a provision in HCS/HB 2895 (2024), substantially similar to a provision in SCS/SB 346 (2023), and similar to a provision in the perfected HCS/HBs 267 & 347 (2023), a provision in HCS/HB 783 (2023), and a provision in CCS/HS/HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 96 (2023).VOTER IDENTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS(Section 115.427)The act makes accommodations for individuals who appear at the office of an election authority to vote absentee and fail to present a form of personal identification by explicitly allowing such voters to cast a provisional ballot that will only be counted upon the voter returning to the office of the election authority by 7:00 p.m. on election day and presenting a form of personal identification for voting.CASTING PROVISIONAL BALLOTS(Section 115.430)The act expands a provision of law governing the casting and counting of provisional ballots to all public elections, rather than just particular primary or general elections.This provision is identical to provisions in SCS/SB 182 (2025), HCS/HB 1525 (2024), HB 2052 (2024), HCS/HB 2140 (2024), HCS/HB 2895 (2024), SCS/SB 346 (2023), the perfected HCS/HBs 267 & 347 (2023), and a provision in HCS/HB 783 (2023).WRITE-IN CANDIDATES - REPEAL OF EXEMPTION FOR ELECTIONS WITHOUT PARTY CANDIDATES(Section 115.453)Current law provides that votes for write-in candidates are only counted for candidates who have filed a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate. Current law also provides an exemption to this requirement in instances where no candidate has filed for the office in question. This act repeals the exemption so that write-in candidates are only counted when a declaration of intent to be a write-in candidate has been filed with the proper election authority.This provision is identical to a provision in SCS/SB 182 (2025).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/19/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB837 Requires all elections for local tax increases to be held at a general or primary election
Sponsor Sen. Mike Cierpiot (R)
Summary
SB 837 - This act requires all proposals for new local taxes, licenses, or fees, or for a renewal or increase in an existing tax, license, or fee, to be submitted to the voters on a general election day or primary election day. This act is identical to SB 929 (2024), SB 479 (2023), and HB 1202 (2023).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026

SB839 Moves school board elections to the November general election
Sponsor Sen. Mike Cierpiot (R)
Summary
SB 839 - Under current law, elections for school board members are held on either the general municipal election day or such day as is specified in the county charter, with terms of office ranging from three years to six years, depending on the district. This act requires all such elections to be held at the November general election and makes all such terms four years. Additionally, a candidate for school board member shall state his or her party affiliation and certain other information on the declaration of candidacy. This act has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2028. This act is similar to SB 485 (2025), HB 539 (2025), HB 2536 (2024), SB 234 (2023), and provisions in SB 740 (2022), HCS/HB 2306 (2022), HB 361 (2019), and HCS/HB 1424 (2018).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026

SB844 Modifies provisions regarding the State Legal Expense Fund as it relates to foster care contractors
Sponsor Sen. Lincoln Hough (R)
Summary
SB 844 - This act provides that the State Legal Expense Fund shall be used to pay claims or final judgments against any entity, including its members, officers, or employees, that provides foster care case management services or residential services under a contract with the state.KATIE O'BRIEN
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/09/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-General Laws

SB847 Modifies provisions relating to the state lottery
Sponsor Sen. Justin Brown (R)
Summary
SB 847 - Current law prohibits the state lottery from approving any lottery game based on the outcome of sporting events. This act repeals such prohibition, provided that the maximum ticket price shall not exceed five dollars per ticket. Additionally, the act authorizes the Lottery Commission to use an internet application to sell electronic scratcher games, draw games, and pull-tab games where a player may access such application using a personal device.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
S - Re-referred to committee - Senate-Select Committee on Gaming

SB853 Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Sponsor Sen. Brian Williams (D)
Summary
SB 853 - Current law requires a county assessor to provide notification to a taxpayer by no later than June 15 if the assessor increases the taxpayer's real property valuation. This act requires such notice to be provided by no later than June 1. (Section 137.180) Additionally, current law requires a taxpayer to file an appeal of the taxpayer's assessed valuation by no later than the second Monday in July. This act requires such appeal to be filed by no later than the first Monday in August. (Sections 137.275 to 138.180)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026
S - Superseded by SB 1410

SB854 Creates provisions relating to expungement
Sponsor Sen. Brian Williams (D)
Summary
SB 854 - CLEAN SLATE ELIGIBLE OFFENSES (Section 610.141)This act provides that beginning August 28, 2029, all records and files maintained by any court pertaining to clean slate eligible offenses, which shall be offenses currently eligible for expungement by law, shall become closed records without the filing of a petition, subject to certain requirements as provided in this act. Additionally, this act provides certain time limitations for when records shall be closed and limitations on the amount of offenses which may be expunged, as provided in this act. This act also provides that beginning August 28, 2029, the Office of State Courts Administrator (OSCA) shall identify and transfer on a monthly basis all clean slate eligible offenses records to the Central Repository and every prosecuting agency in the state within 30 days of the offenses becoming eligible for expungement. All records currently eligible for automated expungement shall be expunged by August 28, 2031. The provisions of this act shall not expunge any delinquent court costs, fines, fees, or other sums order by the court. A prosecuting agency may file an objection to the automated expungement within 60 days from notification of expungement by OSCA. Additionally, OSCA shall provide notification of records to be expunged to the presiding judges of every circuit court and the courts shall order the expungement of all records eligible for expungement, as provided in the act. The Missouri State Highway Patrol shall keep nonpublic records of expungement available to certain entities. Finally, this act provides that, for purposes of the law, the petitioner shall be considered not to have been previous convicted, except for purposes of the requirement to pay restitution to the victim and other purposes as provided in the act. This provision is identical to SB 763 (2024) and SB 1161 (2024) and substantially similar to SB 1194 (2024). REPORTS BY OSCA TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY (Section 610.142)Beginning August 28, 2029, OSCA shall report on a yearly basis to both the Senate and House of Representatives judiciary committees, or equivalent committees, the number of records expunged pursuant to this act and the number of records transmitted back to OSCA from the Missouri State Highway Patrol, any prosecuting agency, or any circuit court with objections that the record is not eligible for expungement. This provision is identical to SB 763 (2024) and SB 1161 (2024) and substantially similar to SB 1194 (2024).CREDIT BUREAU REPORTS (Section 610.143)This act provides that a credit bureau may report records of arrests, indictments pending trial, and convictions of crimes for no longer than 7 years from final disposition. However, any records which have been expunged or any records of a person who has been granted a pardon shall not be reported. Any credit bureau which willfully or negligently violates this act shall be subject to civil penalties. This provision is identical to SB 763 (2024) and SB 1161 (2024) and substantially similar to SB 1194 (2024).MISSOURI EXPUNGEMENT FUND (Section 610.144)This act creates the "Missouri Expungement Fund" which shall be used by the Department of Public Safety, the Office of Administration, and the Office of State Courts Administrator to provide system upgrades, staffing needs, and implement the provisions of this act. This provision is identical to SB 763 (2024), SB 1161 (2024), and substantially similar to SB 1194 (2024). This act is identical to SB 19 (2025).TRISTAN BENSON, JR.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/25/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Judiciary and Civil and Criminal Jurisprudence

SB855 Requires the State Board of Education to convene a work group to develop a curriculum framework of instruction on the dehumanization of marginalized groups
Sponsor Sen. Brian Williams (D)
Summary
SB 855 - Under this act, the State Board of Education shall convene a work group called the "Humanity Education Curriculum Framework Work Group" for purposes of developing a curriculum framework that teachers may use when teaching students in grades 6-12 about the dehumanization of marginalized groups in Missouri. The act defines "dehumanization" as the violation of a person's human rights or bodily autonomy. A "marginalized group" may include persons who have been subjected to dehumanization for reasons that may relate to their national origin, race, or sex. Members of the work group shall include, but shall not be limited to, educators or other experts in the areas of history, human rights, or social science. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) shall develop the curriculum framework in consultation with the work group. The act outlines the topics that the curriculum framework shall address. Such topics shall include, but shall not be limited to, a study of the dehumanization practices that have occurred in Missouri's history and the interventions that may be available to prevent such dehumanization practices in the future. The curriculum framework shall also include the story of Celia, a victim of chattel slavery and sexual violence who was executed in Missouri in 1855 for defending herself against her owner, Robert Newsom. The act describes certain marginalized groups that shall be included in the curriculum framework and awareness weeks or months with which the curriculum framework may be aligned. DESE shall conduct a pilot program to study the impact and success of the curriculum framework in consultation with the work group in up to 25 school districts or schools within a school district in the 2027-28 and 2028-29 school years. All participating schools or districts shall be provided the curriculum framework and offered the opportunity to participate in the "Celia Professional Development Program for Teachers" that shall be developed by the work group and DESE. Such program shall include instructional guidance and examples of curriculum resources that are age appropriate and consistent with the curriculum framework, as described in the act. The program shall also include instructional guidance on class visits to historic sites in Missouri relating to the story of Celia's enslavement, abuse, and execution. All schools or districts that participate in the pilot program shall provide a plan of professional development to such district's or school's teachers and may voluntarily participate in the Celia Professional Development Program for Teachers. Upon the completion of the first year of the pilot program, DESE shall evaluate the success and impact of the pilot program and shall report the results of such evaluation to the General Assembly, as specified in the act. Beginning in the 2029-30 school year and in all subsequent school years, the curriculum framework and Celia Professional Development Program for Teachers shall be made available to all school districts and charter schools in the state. This act is identical to SB 21 (2025) and substantially similar to SB 1446 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB857 Modifies provisions relating to personal property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 857 - Current law requires that personal property be assessed at 33.3% of its true value in money. This act requires political subdivisions to annually reduce such percentage such that the amount by which the revenue generated by taxes levied on such personal property is reduced is substantially equal to one hundred percent of the growth in revenue generated by real property assessment growth, as defined in the act. Annual reductions shall be made until December 31, 2075. Thereafter, the percentage of true value in money at which personal property is assessed shall be equal to the percentage in effect on December 31, 2075. Subject to appropriations, a political subdivision that receives less than the allowable amount of total real and personal property tax revenues shall be eligible for reimbursement from the state in an amount equal to the amount by which such revenues are below the allowable amount. This act is identical to SB 294 (2025), SB 274 (2025), SB 1086 (2024), SB 725 (2024), and SB 733 (2024), and to a provision in SS/SB 1207 (2024), and is substantially similar to SS/SCS/SB 8 (2023) and SB 493 (2023), and to a provision in HCS/SCS/SB 163 (2025), SB 171 (2025), SB 359 (2025), HB 464 (2025), SCS/HB 629 (2025), HB 903 (2025), HB 988 (2025), HCS/SS/SB 23 (2023), HCS/SS#3/SCS/SB 131 (2023), SS/SCS/SB 133 (2023), as amended, HCS/SS/SB 143 (2023), HCS/SB 247 (2023), and SCS/HCS#2/HB 713 (2023).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB862 Modifies provisions relating to gaming
Sponsor Sen. Jason Bean (R)
Summary
SB 862 - This act modifies provisions relating to gaming.ILLEGAL GAMING This act establishes the "Illegal Gaming Enforcement Fund", which shall consist of a portion of moneys generated from an administrative fee imposed on video lottery terminals authorized by the act. Moneys in the fund shall be used by the Attorney General, prosecutors, and law enforcement to investigate, enforce, charge, and prosecute illegal gaming in this state. (Section 27.180) Current law authorizes the superintendent of the Highway Patrol to enter into an agreement with the Missouri Gaming Commission to enforce laws relating to gaming. This act authorizes the superintendent to also enter into such an agreement with the Missouri Lottery Commission. (Section 43.050) The act modifies the definition of "advance gambling activity" to include conduct directed toward the creation or establishment of a gambling device. The act also provides that the term "gambling" does not include video lottery gaming authorized by the act. (Sections 572.010 and 572.100) This act establishes the "Missouri Gaming Bureau" within the Department of Public Safety. The director of the Bureau shall be a uniformed member of the Highway Patrol, and the Bureau may contract with the Missouri Gaming Commission and the Missouri Lottery Commission for criminal and regulatory investigations involving excursion gambling boats and video lottery gaming authorized by the act. Members of the Bureau shall be paid from funds designated as administrative within the State Lottery Fund. (Section 650.930)VIDEO LOTTERY GAMING This act establishes the "Missouri Video Lottery Regulatory Act". This act allows the State Lottery Commission to implement a system of video lottery game terminals and to issue licenses to video lottery game manufacturers, distributors, operators, handlers, and retailers. The Commission shall not allow a single vendor or licensee to be responsible for implementing the program. (313.429.1) Video lottery game terminals may be placed in any video lottery game retailer's location, as such term is defined in the act. (Section 313.427) Video lottery game terminals shall be connected to a central control system developed or procured by the Commission. No video lottery game terminal shall be placed in operation without first being connected to such centralized computer system, and shall remain connected at all times. Video lottery game terminals shall meet the standards provided for in the act. (Section 313.429.2(14)) The Commission shall impose a non-refundable application fee, as described in the act. The initial license shall be for a period of one year. Thereafter, the license renewal period shall be four years with the applicable license renewal fee paid for each year such license is renewed, as described in the act. In addition to such license fees, video lottery game operators shall pay the Department of Revenue an annual administrative fee of $1,000 for each video lottery game terminal placed in service. No license shall be issued to any person who has been convicted of a felony or crime involving illegal gambling. (Section 313.429.3) Video lottery game operators and video lottery game retailers shall enter into a use agreement for the placement of video lottery game terminals, as described in the act. The agreement shall specify an equal division of net terminal income after adjustments for taxes and administrative fees are made. Video lottery game operators and video lottery game retailers are prohibited from offering anything of value other than the percentage of adjusted gross receipts for the placement of video lottery terminals. (Section 313.429.4) Video lottery game operators shall pay winning tickets using a video lottery game ticket redemption terminal, which shall be located within the video lottery game retailer's establishment in direct proximity of where such video lottery games are offered. Unredeemed video lottery game tickets shall expire after 180 days of issue. (Section 313.429.8) The price of video lottery game terminal credits shall be determined by the Commission, and the maximum wager played per video lottery game shall not exceed $4.00. No cash award for the maximum wager played on any individual lottery game shall exceed one dollar less than the maximum amount allowable by federal law before tax withholding is required. (Section 313.429.10(1)) Operators shall not operate more than eight terminals at any one video lottery game retailer location. (Section 313.429.10(2)) A person under the age of twenty-one shall not play video lottery games. Video lottery game operators shall have a video surveillance system within the immediate area of the retailer's establishment where video lottery game terminals are located. (Section 313.429.11(1) and (2)) Video lottery game operators shall pay to the Commission thirty-one percent of the video lottery game adjusted gross gaming revenue. The Commission shall retain an amount necessary to cover administrative expenses, and the remainder shall be appropriated equally to public elementary and secondary education and public institutions of higher education, as described in the act. (Section 313.429.12) Video lottery game operators shall pay to the Department of Revenue an additional "municipality and county administration tax" of three percent of the video lottery game adjusted gross gaming revenue. The Department shall distribute such funds to the cities and counties in which video lottery gaming terminals are located. (Section 313.429.13) The Commission shall procure a centralized computer system no later than 180 days following the effective date of the act, and shall establish start and operational dates as described in the act. (Section 313.431) Participation in the state lottery under this act shall not be construed to be a lottery or gift enterprise in violation of Article III, Section 39 of the Constitution of Missouri. (Section 313.433) This act allows municipalities and counties to adopt ordinances permitting or prohibiting video lottery game terminals within the municipality or the unincorporated area of the county. (Section 313.435) The act requires the Commission to prescribe an application form for licensure, which shall include information as described in the act. The Commission shall require every licensee to post a bond, a bonding fee, or a letter of credit in an amount determined by the Commission. Licenses granted by the Commission shall be nontransferable. The Commission shall revoke a license upon certain findings described in the act. A person who knowingly makes a false statement on an application shall be guilty of a class A misdemeanor. (Section 313.438) The act empowers the Commission to administer oaths, subpoena witnesses, and require production of documents and records, as described in the act. (Section 313.442) The act contains a severability clause. (Section 313.445) These provisions are substantially similar to SB 16 (2025), SB 73 (2025), SB 112 (2025), SB 192 (2023), SB 557 (2023), SB 574 (2023), HB 699 (2023), SB 642 (2022), SB 686 (2022), SB 19 (2021), SB 319 (2021), HB 1014 (2021), SB 566 (2020), SB 43 (2019), and SB 452 (2017), and to provisions in SB 824 (2024), SB 1083 (2024), SB 1021 (2024), HB 2921 (2024), SB 1 (2023), SB 906 (2022), SS/HCS/HBs 2502 & 2556 (2022), HB 2080 (2022), SCS/SB 98 (2021), HB 915 (2021), SS#3/SCS/SB 44 (2019), and SS/SCS/SB 767 (2018), and are similar to HB 990 (2017).EXCURSION GAMBLING BOAT ADMISSION FEE Current law requires excursion gambling boat licensees to pay an admission fee of $2 per person, with $1 deposited to the Gaming Commission Fund and the remaining $1 paid to the home dock city or county. This act increases such fee to $4 per person, and allocates the additional $2 to the Missouri Veterans Commission. (Section 313.820) JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
S - Re-referred to committee - Senate-Select Committee on Gaming

SB863 Establishes the "Interscholastic Athletic Oversight Commission", a board of directors appointed by the Governor to hear appeals of certain decisions made by statewide activities associations
Sponsor Sen. Jason Bean (R)
Summary
SS#2 SB 863 -- STATEWIDE ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATIONS This bill creates provisions governing organizations that facilitate interscholastic activities for public secondary school students. The bill defines an "activities association" as a statewide nonprofit organization that includes at least one public school, charter school, or school district as a fee-paying member and that facilitates interscholastic activities for secondary school students, more than 50% of which are athletic activities. The term "activities association" does not include organizations that do not facilitate interscholastic athletic activities, such as career and technical student organizations, academic honor societies, service organizations, and leadership organizations. A "public school" is defined as including both public schools and charter schools. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, appeals of decisions made by an activities association can be heard by the newly created "Interscholastic Athletic Oversight Commission", consisting of five members appointed by the Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The term of office of each member will be four years, except that two of the initial appointments will serve two-year terms. The Oversight Commission will hear appeals after the activities association's appeals process has been exhausted or appeals that are made directly to the Oversight Commission. The Oversight Commission will hear only: (1) Appeals of decisions relating to eligibility due to transfers of students deemed to be for athletic purposes; and (2) Appeals relating to contests and contest procedures. The Oversight Commission can recommend rule changes to the activities association to be considered through the activities association's rulemaking procedures. An activities association must prepare an annual report and present it to House and Senate committees to be chosen by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President Pro Tem of the Senate. The report must be presented to the committees within the first 30 days of the legislative session. The Oversight Commission is established within the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) for purposes of hearing appeals. DESE must provide sufficient administrative and financial personnel to support the work of the Oversight Commission, and will promulgate rules as necessary to implement a fair and timely appeals process, including timelines and procedural rules for the appeals process. If the Oversight Commission is named as a defendant in any action arising from or relating to a decision of the Oversight Commission, the Attorney General must represent the Oversight Commission and the State will be responsible for all attorney's fees, costs, and damages incurred. The Oversight Commission can meet in person or hold virtual meetings. All decisions of the Oversight Commission are final, not subject to further appeal, and must be adhered to and implemented by the activities association.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/09/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

SB864 Modifies provisions relating to tax credits
Sponsor Sen. Jason Bean (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 864 - This act modifies provisions relating to tax credits.WOOD ENERGY TAX CREDIT A tax credit for the production of certain wood-energy processed wood products expires on June 30, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. (Section 135.305) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025).MEAT PROCESSING FACILITIES TAX CREDIT The Meat Processing Facility Investment Tax Credit for the expansion or modernization of meat processing facilities expires on December 31, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. (Section 135.686) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025).HIGHER ETHANOL FUEL TAX CREDIT A tax credit for the sale of higher ethanol blend fuels expires on December 31, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. (Section 135.772) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025).BIODIESEL RETAIL SALE TAX CREDIT A tax credit for the sale of biodiesel fuels expires on December 31, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. This act provides that a taxpayer shall not be liable for penalties or interest on an income tax balance due if such taxpayer is denied part or all of a tax credit to which the taxpayer has qualified due to lack of available funds, and such denial causes a balance-due notice to be generated by the Department of Revenue or any other redeeming agency. Such taxpayer shall pay the balance due within sixty days or be subject to penalties and interest pursuant to current law. (Section 135.775) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025).BIODIESEL PRODUCTION TAX CREDIT A tax credit for the production of biodiesel fuels expires on December 31, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. (Section 135.778) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025).RAILROAD INFRASTRUCTURE TAX CREDIT For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act authorizes a tax credit in the amount of fifty percent of an eligible taxpayer's qualified railroad expenditures and qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures. "Qualified railroad expenditures" are defined as gross expenditures for maintenance, reconstruction, or replacement of railroad infrastructure, as described in the act. "Qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures" are defined as gross expenditures for new rail infrastructure, as described in the act. A tax credit for qualified railroad expenditures shall not exceed $5,000 multiplied by the number of miles of railroad track owned or leased in the state by a railroad, and the total amount of tax credits for qualified railroad expenditures authorized in a calendar year shall not exceed $4.5 million. A tax credit for qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures shall not exceed $1 million for each new rail-served customer project, and the total amount of tax credits for qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures authorized in a calendar year shall not exceed $5 million. An eligible taxpayer shall submit a certificate of eligibility to the Department of Economic Development after the completion of the qualified railroad expenditures or qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures. Tax credits authorized by the act shall not be refundable, but may be carried forward for five subsequent tax years. Tax credits may be transferred as described in the act. This act shall sunset on December 31, 2032, unless reauthorized by the General Assembly. (Section 135.1210) This provision is identical to SCS/SB 462 (2025) and to a provision in SB 913 (2026), and is substantially similar to HCS/HB 669 (2025), SS/SCS/SB 876 (2024), HB 1824 (2024), SB 385 (2023), and HCS/HB 657 (2023), and to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 1935 (2024), and HCS/HB 939 (2023).URBAN FARMS TAX CREDIT A tax credit for the establishment or improvement of urban farms expires on December 31, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. (Section 135.1610) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025).ROLLING STOCK TAX CREDIT A tax credit for eligible expenses incurred in the manufacture, maintenance, or improvement of a freight line company's qualified rolling stock expires on August 28, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. (Section 137.1018) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025).AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION TAX CREDITS Tax credits for contributions to the Missouri Agriculture and Small Business Development Authority and investments in new generation cooperatives for the purpose of development of agricultural business expire on December 31, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. (Section 348.436) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025).SPECIALTY AGRICULTURAL CROPS The "Specialty Agricultural Crops Act" loan program for family farmers and tax credits for lenders expires on December 31, 2028. This act repeals such sunset. (Sections 348.491 and 348.493) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025), HCS/HB 642 (2025), SCS/HCS/HB 1116 (2025), HCS/HB 1317 (2025). This act is identical to SCS/SB 30 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/29/2026

SB867 Requires certain financial information regarding the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program to be posted semi-annually on the Missouri Accountability Portal
Sponsor Sen. Doug Beck (D)
Summary
SB 867 - This act requires certain financial information regarding the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program (MOScholars) to be posted semi-annually on the Missouri Accountability Portal. Specifically, the Portal shall include the following information: (1) The full name of each parent of a student who receives a scholarship from each educational assistance organization; (2) The total amount of money awarded to each parent's student; and (3) The total amount of money remitted from each scholarship account to each qualified school. Educational assistance organizations shall supply the required information to the State Treasurer no later than July 1 and January 1 of each year. The State Treasurer shall have 48 hours to deliver such information to the Office of Administration.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB869 Establishes the Revitalizing Missouri Downtowns and Main Streets Act
Sponsor Sen. Steven Roberts (D)
Summary
SB 869 - This act establishes the "Revitalizing Missouri Downtowns and Main Streets Act". For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act authorizes a taxpayer to claim a tax credit equal to 25% of qualified conversion expenditures, as defined in the act, or 30% of qualified conversion expenditures with respect to upper floor housing, as described in the act, incurred for converting nonresidential real property from office use to predominantly residential use, which may include retail or other commercial use. Tax credits authorized by the act shall not be refundable, but may be carried back three years or carried forward ten years. Tax credits may also be transferred, sold, or assigned, as described in the act. The total amount of tax credits authorized pursuant to this act shall not exceed $50 million in any fiscal year. Fifty percent of such maximum amount shall be reserved for qualified converted buildings of more than 750,000 square feet and shall be allocated to the annual limit over a period of ten years, provided that such project meets criteria described in the act. Twenty-five percent of the maximum amount of tax credits available to be authorized shall be authorized solely for projects located in a qualified Missouri main street district, as defined in the act. If the total amount of such reserved tax credits have been authorized, projects located in a qualified Missouri main street district may receive tax credits from the remaining unreserved amount of tax credits. If the maximum amount of allowable tax credits is authorized in any given fiscal year, such maximum allowable amount shall be increased by the percentage increase in inflation. A taxpayer shall apply to the Department of Economic Development to receive tax credits pursuant to this act. Such application shall include proof of ownership or site control, floor plans of the existing structure, architectural plans, and, where applicable, plans of the proposed conversion of the structure, as well as proposed additions, estimated cost of conversion, the anticipated total costs of the project, the actual basis of the property, as shown by proof of actual acquisition costs, the anticipated total labor costs, the estimated project start date, and the estimated project completion date, proof that the property is an eligible property, a copy of all land use and building approvals reasonably necessary for the commencement of the project, and any other information which the Department may reasonably require to review the project for approval. All taxpayers with applications receiving approval shall submit within 120 days following the award of credits evidence of the capacity of the applicant to finance the costs and expenses for the conversion of the eligible property. All taxpayers with applications receiving approval, excluding projects of more than 750,000 square feet, shall commence conversion within twelve months of the date of issuance of the letter from the Department granting the approval for tax credits. To claim a tax credit authorized by this act, a taxpayer with approval shall apply for final approval and issuance of tax credits from the Department, which shall determine the final amount of qualified conversion expenditures and whether the completed rehabilitation meets the requirements of the act. The final application shall demonstrate that the taxpayer has substantially converted a qualified converted building; satisfactory evidence of any qualified conversion expenditures for the structure, as determined by the Department; and any other information reasonably requested by the Department. The Department shall determine, on an annual basis, the overall economic impact to the state from the rehabilitation of eligible property pursuant to this act. No taxpayer shall be issued tax credits for qualified conversion expenditures on a qualified converted building within 27 years of a previous issuance of tax credits pursuant to this act on such qualified converted building. This act shall sunset on December 31, 2034, unless reauthorized by the General Assembly. This act is identical to SS/SCS/SB 35 (2025) and is substantially similar to HCS/HBs 610 & 900 (2025) and SB 792 (2024), and to a provision in HCS/HB 1935 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/21/2026

SB874 Requires public schools to provide free breakfast and lunch to all students
Sponsor Sen. Angela Mosley (D)
Summary
SB 874 - Beginning in the 2026-27 school year, this act requires each public school to provide each student enrolled in such school one free breakfast and one free lunch each day the student attends classes. This act is identical to HB 112 (2025) and HB 172 (2023).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB877 Requires General Assembly and gubernatorial approval of proposed administrative rules with a fiscal note over $250,000
Sponsor Sen. Travis Fitzwater (R)
Summary
SB 877 - For any proposed administrative rule submitted by a state agency that will result in the expenditure of public funds by a state entity or political subdivision of greater than $250,000, or will result in a loss of income to an individual or business of greater than $250,000, this act requires the state agency to notify the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. The Committee may hold hearings on the proposed rule. Such proposed rule shall not become effective until approved by the General Assembly through passage of a concurrent resolution. The provisions of this act will not apply to emergency rules or rules required by federal law or for federal funding. A state agency shall not file any final order of rulemaking with the Secretary of State until at least 30 days after such final order of rulemaking has been received by the Committee. Further, a state agency shall not file any notice of proposed rulemaking with the Secretary of State without first receiving from, and including a copy of, the written approval of the Governor. This act is similar to SCS/SB 350 (2025) and HB 2554 (2024).JIM ERTLE
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/14/2026
S - Superseded by SB 891

SB879 Modifies and creates new provisions relating to electric utilities
Sponsor Sen. Travis Fitzwater (R)
Summary
SB 879 - The act creates and modifies provisions relating to electric utilities.   PERMIT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SOLAR FARMS (Section 67.5350) Under the act, prior to obtaining a certificate of public convenience or necessity from the Public Service Commission, any person constructing a solar farm shall first submit an application to the county commission in each county where the solar farm is to be located.   The county commission of any county shall adopt an order or an ordinance requiring a permit to construct a solar farm within specified boundaries in an unincorporated area within the county. The permit shall be constructed within specific distances from certain properties described in the act. The permit shall require noise levels not to exceed 45 decibels from any property line.   Within 90 days of receiving an application for a permit, the county commission shall hold a public meeting before the issuance of a permit. Notice shall be provided at least 14 days prior to the public meeting. The applicant shall provide certain information at the public meeting as described in the act.   No later than 90 days after the public meeting, the county commission shall do the following: - Issue a permit; - Issue a permit limiting the boundaries of the proposed solar farm; or - Deny the permit.   Any applicant intending to make a material amendment to the permit once it is issued shall submit a new application for the permit to the county commission. The county commission shall require any applicant who is issued a permit to obtain liability insurance in an amount sufficient to cover any damages which may arise from the construction of the solar farm.   The Public Service Commission shall not issue a certificate of public convenience or necessity to any applicant who did not receive a permit from a county commission in each county where the solar farm is to be located.   The county commission of any county where a solar farm is proposed to be constructed shall require a decommissioning plan of the solar farm, as described in the act.   This provision has an emergency clause.   These provisions are similar to provisions in SB 213 (2025) and SB 892 (2024).   TAXATION OF SOLAR ENERGY PROJECTS (Section 137.100, 137.124, 153.030, & 153.034) Current law exempts solar energy systems not held for resale from property taxes. This act repeals such provision and provides that solar energy systems constructed for exclusive use of a single property may be exempted from property tax at the discretion of the county assessor.   Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing all real property, excluding land, or tangible personal property associated with a project that uses solar energy directly to generate electricity and that was built or constructed to sell power, the tax liability actually owed shall be equal to $6,000 per megawatt of nameplate capacity and shall be adjusted for inflation annually.   Nothing in this provision shall be construed to prohibit a project from engaging in enhanced enterprise zone agreements or similar tax abatement agreements or to affect any existing enhanced enterprise zone agreements.   Beginning January 1, 2027, for purposes of assessing land that is associated with a solar energy project, the land shall be assessed as commercial property.   Beginning January 1, 2027, for any public utility that has a solar energy project, such solar energy project shall be assessed using certain methodology for real and personal property as described in the act.   The real and tangible personal property associated with a project which uses solar energy shall include certain solar equipment as described in the act.   These provisions are identical to SB 892 (2024), HB 2651 (2024), SB 549 (2023), SB 1014 (2022) and HB 1997 (2022), and similar to provisions in SB 213 (2025), a provision in HCS#2/HBs 440 & 1160 (2025).   COMMISSION'S RULEMAKING AUTHORITY RELATING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION LINES ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (Section 393.172) By March 31, 2027, the Public Service Commission shall promulgate rules applicable to electrical corporations requiring construction of electric transmission lines for which permission is sought from the Commission to adhere to specific standards relating to construction activities occurring on privately owned agricultural land. Such standards are described in the act.   This provision is identical to a provision in SB 213 (2025), SB 892 (2024), and similar to a provision in HB 221 (2025), a provision in SB 139 (2025), a provision in SB 805 (2024).   SOLAR PROJECTS NOT TO EXCEED MORE THAN 2% OF ALL CROPLAND (Section 393.1120) The total amount of real property associated with all solar energy projects in any county shall not be more than 2% of all cropland in the county.   The county commission or other authorized governing body may increase the percentage of cropland by order, ordinance, regulation, or vote of the residents of the county.   Any resident of the county shall have standing to bring suit to enforce these provisions against a solar energy project developer.   For all solar energy projects built on or after January 1, 2027, such project shall be subject to setback distances, as described in the act. This provision shall not apply to solar projects built and operating at capacity on or before December 31, 2026.   A solar energy company shall secure all property rights or easements necessary for transmission and interconnection for the solar energy project to connect to the electrical grid prior to beginning construction of the solar energy project.   This provision is similar to a provision in HB 440 (2025).   CONDEMNATION OF PROPERTY (Section 523.010) Under the act, the authority of any electrical corporation to condemn property shall not extend to the construction of any structure or facility that uses wind or solar energy to generate or manufacture electricity.   The authority of any electrical corporation to condemn property shall extend to acquisition of rights needed to construct, operate, and maintain certain electrical infrastructure, described in the act, needed to collect and deliver solar or wind energy to the distribution or transmission grid.   This provision is identical to SB 199 (2025), a provision in SB 214 (2025), SB 1262 (2024), to a provision in SB 805 (2024), a provision in HB 1449 (2024), a provision in SCS/HCS/HB 1746 (2024), provisions in HB 1052 (2023) and substantially similar to a provision in HB 221 (2025), a provision in HCS#2/HBs 440 & 1160 (2025), HB 475 (2025), a provision in SB 139 (2025), HB 1750 (2024), and SB 577 (2023). JULIA SHEVELEVA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB880 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SB 880 - Current law requires the Director of Revenue to annually publish the updated income brackets for the state income tax. This act requires such publication to be made on the Department's website.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/29/2026
S - Reported Do Pass - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB886 Creates the "Keep Our Schools Safe Act" regarding school safety
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 886 - This act establishes the "Keep Our Schools Safe Act" and creates and modifies provisions relating to school safety. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, this act authorizes a tax credit for teachers, administrative personnel, and athletic coaches at public, private, and charter schools to purchase a firearm or pay for an eligible firearms safety course. No taxpayer may claim a tax credit in excess of $150, and the total amount of tax credits allocated in any tax year shall not exceed $500,000. The Department of Public Safety (DPS) shall establish criteria defining an eligible course and shall post such criteria, along with a list of eligible courses, on the DPS website, as well as submitting this information to the Department of Revenue. The act creates the "Keep Our Schools Safe Act" relating to school protection officers and firearm safety training for students. Currently, a school district may designate a teacher or school administrator a school protection officer. This act requires each public school, charter school, and private school to designate a school protection officer to be present at all times when children are on the school campus, as provided in the act. In addition to teachers and administrators, a school may also designate a retired law enforcement officer or retired member of the Armed Forces of the United States to serve as a volunteer school protection officer. A school protection officer shall carry a concealed firearm and a self-defense spray device. Any volunteer school protection officer who violates provisions of law regarding concealed firearms and self-defense spray may be subject to removal from the building and dismissal as a volunteer. Any teacher or administrator who violates such provisions may additionally be subject to employment termination proceedings. Before an individual is designated a school protection officer, a school shall conduct a public hearing regarding such appointment, as provided in current law. Each school shall ensure that all students enrolled in prekindergarten through grade eight participate in a mandatory, annual Eddie Eagle Gunsafe training course on firearm safety provided by the National Rifle Association. This act similar to SB 399 (2023), HCS/HB 1961 (2020), and provisions in HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 523 (2020), HCS/SS/SB 600 (2020), and in HCS/SB 774 (2020).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/29/2026
S - Removed from Senate Hearing Agenda - 1/29/26 - 9:30 am - SCR 2 - Senate-Education

SB889 Repeals expired, terminated, sunset, and obsolete sections of law
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Government Efficiency by a vote of 9 to 6 with 2 members voting present. Voted to "Return to Committee of Origin" by a vote of 9 to 2. This act repeals a number of expired, terminated, sunset, and obsolete statutes and references to such statutes contained in another statutes. The bill repeals the Missouri Economic Diversification and Afforestation Act of 1990. Currently, a local board of education for a school district must establish a written policy of discipline that includes the district's determination on the use of corporal punishment. This bill repeals the provisions on the use of corporal punishment. Further, the bill repeals a provision of current law that states that spanking, when administered by certified school personnel and in the presence of a school district employee, is not considered child abuse. This bill also repeals a number of provisions of law concerning the acquisition of one insurance company by another, the payment of dividends by insurance companies, required deposits by life insurance companies; assessment plan life insurance and stipulated premium plan life insurance, mutual insurance companies other than for life and fire, and required cash reserves for reciprocal or inter-insurance exchanges. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that the provisions of this bill do not change any substantive language, except for those provisions related to school-sponsored spanking of students. Supporters further state that bills of this nature used to be passed into law frequently, but no "clean up" bills have been signed into law in recent years. Such clean up measures are long overdue. Testifying in person for the bill were Senator Coleman; and Arnie Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

SB890 Repeals expired, terminated, sunset, and obsolete sections of law
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SS SCS SB 890 -- OBSOLETE ADMINISTRATIVE ENTITIES This bill repeals and reassigns duties for a number of administrative entities. The Division of Workforce Development within the Department of Economic Development is renamed and moved to the Office of Workforce Development within the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development. The Board for Certification of Interpreters is repealed and its duties assigned to the Missouri Commission for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. The Life Sciences Research Board is repealed and its duties assigned the Department of Economic Development. The bill repeals the Missouri Quality Home Care Council and all duties of the Council. The bill repeals the following entities: the Career Readiness Course Task Force; the Life Sciences Research Board; the Board for Certification of Interpreters; the Infection Control Advisory Panel; the Missouri Arthritis Advisory Board, regional arthritis centers, and the Arthritis Program Review Committee; the AgriMissouri Advisory Commission for Marketing Missouri Agricultural Products; the Coordinating Board for Early Childhood; the Minority Environmental Literacy Advisory Committee; the Missouri Cybersecurity Commission; the Small Business Compliance Advisory Committee; and the Commission on the Special Health, Psychological and Social Needs of Minority Older Individuals. This bill requires each State department with oversight of an administrative entity to submit an annual report to the General Assembly detailing any administrative entity that has not convened a public meeting or conducted public business during the three-year period. The report must be sent by October 1st annually. Currently, the Department of Health and Senior Services must develop and disseminate to the public reports based on data from medical facilities related to infections. Such reports must be updated quarterly. The bill decreases the frequency of required updates to at least annually.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/13/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

SB891 Modifies provisions relating to the administrative rules process
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SCS/SBs 891 & 877 - For any proposed administrative rule change submitted by a state agency that will result in the expenditure of public funds by a state entity or political subdivision of greater than $250,000, or will result in a loss of income to an individual or business of greater than $250,000, this act requires the state agency to notify the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. The Committee may hold hearings on the proposed rule. Such proposed rule shall not become effective until approved by the General Assembly through passage of a concurrent resolution. The provisions of this act will not apply to emergency rules or rules required by federal law or for federal funding.A state agency shall not file any notice of proposed rulemaking with the Secretary of State without first receiving, and including a copy of, the written approval of the Governor.These provisions are similar to SCS/SB 350 (2025) and similar to HB 2554 (2024).This act requires that any rule promulgated by a state agency must be specifically authorized by a state statute. An agency cannot rely on a general grant of rulemaking authority to supplement a specific grant of authority.The act further requires that all substantive policy statements, as defined in the act, be posted on the agency's publicly accessible website and requires the agency to maintain a complete and current record of such statements for public inspection. These provisions are identical to SB 1549 (2026).JIM ERTLE
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/14/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted

SB892 Requires the State Board of Education to cause its annual report to be published on the website of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Sponsor Sen. Jill Carter (R)
Summary
SB 892 - This act requires the State Board of Education to cause its annual report to be published on the website of the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), in addition to printing 60 copies for DESE and the State Library. This act is similar to SB 589 (2023) and SB 1208 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/17/2026
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-Education

SB898 Provides for the establishment of an early education school district in St. Louis County
Sponsor Sen. Tracy McCreery (D)
Summary
SB 898 - This act provides that a special district called an "early education district" may be established in St. Louis County for purposes of providing free public prekindergarten programs for children in the year before kindergarten eligibility. An early education district may establish schools and programs for eligible children within any school district in the county. The school districts in St. Louis County shall continue providing prekindergarten services to eligible children who reside in the county until the resources of the early education district are sufficient to permit its assuming such responsibilities. The curriculum of an early education district shall be developmentally appropriate and aligned with the Missouri Early Learning Standards and other standards specified in the act. An early education district shall comply with any accountability metrics for early childhood education established by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) and shall provide reasonable assistance to DESE in the development of any such accountability metrics. DESE shall inspect all programs established by an early education district. Upon DESE's approval, and upon the levy of an initial property tax for the early education district, the district shall receive state aid as specified in the act, and all teachers and other personnel of the early education district shall be eligible for Career Ladder and retirement allowances in the same manner as other public school employees are eligible for Career Ladder and retirement allowances under current law. (Section 162.2000) When the voters of St. Louis County desire to form an early education district, a petition signed by voters of the county shall be submitted to the Board of Election Commissioners as specified in the act. Within 30 days of receipt of such petition, the Board of Election Commissioners shall verify the signatures and cause the proposal to be submitted to the voters of the county at the next general municipal election using ballot language provided in the act. When a new early education district is organized, it shall be a body corporate and political subdivision of the state. An early education district may sue and be sued, levy and collect taxes within the limitations of the Constitution of Missouri and the provisions of the act, issue bonds, and possess the same corporate powers as seven-director school districts, other than urban districts. (Section 162.2005) The board of education of an early education district shall perform the same duties and be subject to the same liabilities as the board of a seven-director school district, other than an urban district, acting under the general school laws of the state of Missouri. The act outlines certain powers that the board of education shall have, such as the power to employ teachers and other personnel necessary to provide prekindergarten programs for eligible children. The board shall also have the power to develop a rolling five-year plan for the operation and management of the early education district, as provided in the act. (Section 162.2015) Members of the board of education of an early education district shall be elected by the voters of the district in municipal elections conducted in accordance with the state's election laws. Each qualified candidate for the board of education shall be a voter of the early education district who has resided within the state for at least one year preceding the election and who is at least 24 years of age. For the initial election of board members, all candidates shall file their declarations of candidacy with the secretary of the State Board of Education. For all subsequent elections, candidates for the board shall file their declarations of candidacy with the board of education of the early education district. Board members shall serve staggered three-year terms as specified in the act. Any vacancy occurring in the unexpired term of office of any board member shall be filled in a manner described in the act. Members of the board shall be prohibited from certain activities, such as accepting any contract or procurement in which that board member has a direct or indirect beneficial interest, unless certain conditions are met. (Section 162.2025) The initial tax imposed on property subject to the taxing power of an early education district shall not exceed the annual rate of 52 cents on each $100 assessed valuation, which tax rate shall be used to fund such district's prekindergarten programs. Increases in the tax rate may be made with voter approval in the same manner as provided under current law for other school districts. The taxes levied by an early education district shall not be included when determining the average school levy for the other school districts in St. Louis County. The taxes levied by the early education district shall be collected in the same manner as general county taxes. (Section 162.2035) This act is identical to SB 233 (2025) and similar to SB 1508 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB901 Creates provisions relating to age verification on adult websites
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 901 - The act creates provisions relating to age verification on adult websites. Under the act, a commercial entity that publishes or distributes material on its website, including a social media platform, more than 1/3 of which is sexual material harmful to minors, as defined in the act, shall use reasonable age verification methods to verify that an individual attempting to access the material is 18 years of age or older. A commercial entity or a third party that performs age verification shall not retain any identifying information of the individual. A commercial entity that is required to perform age verification under the act shall post certain notices on its website, as described in the act. The act shall not apply to bona fide news or public interest broadcasts or other media and shall not affect the rights of a news-gathering organization. An internet service provider or subsidiary, search engine, or cloud service shall not be held liable for violating provisions of the act solely for providing internet access to any content not under the provider's control. The Attorney General shall enforce provisions of the act. If the Attorney General believes that a violation occurred and an action is in the public interest, the Attorney General may commence an action. If the court finds that a violation occurred, the court may grant relief, as described in the act.JULIA SHEVELEVA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/25/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-General Laws

SB905 Modifies language relating to school protection officers and creates Missouri Rangers training program
Sponsor Sen. David Gregory (R)
Summary
The bill requires the POST Commission to establish a training program, to be known as the "Missouri Rangers", and establish minimum standards for training instructors, training centers, and training programs that focus on preventing and responding to emergency or violent crisis situations in school settings. The arrest powers granted to any person who successfully completes the Missouri Rangers training program will be limited to: (1) Missouri Rangers who are actively employed by the school or school district; (2) Any property or premises owned, leased, rented, or possessed by the school or school district, including any school buses; and (3) Weapons offenses and any trespass offense involving school property, provided that such provision will not apply to any person who is an active law enforcement officer. The program must not be longer than 160 hours, and will consist of state and federal constitutional and statutory law; firearms training; close quarter combat; implicit and racial bias; active shooter training; defensive tactics; and any other related training deemed necessary by the POST Commission. An applicant will not be granted entry to the training program without successfully completing the physical training requirements for their age range, as specified in the bill, and completing a criminal history background check. The POST Commission is granted the authority to promulgate rules for continuing education training for the Missouri Rangers. The POST Commission is authorized to develop a part-time training program if it meets all the requirements of this bill. A certificate of Missouri Ranger training program completion and a Ranger badge will be issued to any person that successfully completes the training program. A copy of such certificate must be provided to the director of the Department of Public Safety. Under this bill, the outermost garment of the Missouri Ranger uniform must display the title "RANGER" in capitalized block letters. A Missouri Ranger may, if authorized by the hiring school or school district, carry certain weapons onto any school bus or school property. A hiring school or school district will decide whether a Missouri Ranger will carry certain weapons while on duty, the type of weapon, and whether the weapon can be concealed. Each Ranger will use a level three retention holster if open carrying while on duty. For the purpose of liability and workers' compensation, each Missouri Ranger will be considered an employee of the school or school district that hires them. All other benefits, such as health and retirement benefits, can be offered to the Ranger at the discretion of the school or school district. Rangers can be employed and compensated as a full- or part-time employee, or as a volunteer without compensation. Rangers will have qualified immunity.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/13/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

SB906 Creates, modifies, and repeals provisions relating to student transfers to nonresident districts
Sponsor Sen. David Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 906 - Current law authorizes students who reside in an unaccredited school district to transfer to an accredited school district in the same or an adjoining county under certain conditions. This act repeals and modifies provisions limiting these transfers to students in unaccredited school districts. Under the act, any student may transfer to another public school, including transfers from a student's district of residence, or "sending district", to a public school in a nonresident district, or "receiving district", beginning in the 2027-28 school year and in all subsequent school years. The school board of each school district shall determine the district's capacity to accept student transfers in each grade level and in each school in the district. Each school board shall provide this information to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) beginning on July 15, 2027, and by the first day of each month thereafter. DESE shall publish and update the capacity of each district's grade levels and schools on its website. (Section 167.895) Parents of students who wish to transfer shall notify DESE by August 1, 2027, and by the first day of each month thereafter, and DESE shall assign students to a receiving district or charter school as provided in the act. A receiving district shall accept all students who apply and are assigned to the district, so long as there is capacity for each student. School board policies shall not discriminate against any transfer student on the basis of his or her residential address, academic performance, athletic ability, disability, race, ethnicity, sex, or free and reduced price lunch status. (Sections 167.895 and 167.898) The act repeals provisions that require sending districts to make tuition payments to receiving districts. Instead, for purposes of calculating state and federal aid, each transfer student shall be counted as a resident of the receiving district in which the student is enrolled. Tuition shall not be charged to any student or to his or her parent or legal guardian. (Sections 160.415, 162.081, 167.132, 167.151, and 167.895) DESE shall designate at least one receiving district or charter school to which each sending district shall provide transportation. A sending district shall be required to provide transportation only to the school district or charter school designated by DESE. (Section 167.241) If the receiving district is part of a special school district, the sending district shall contract with the special school district for the entirety of the costs to provide special education and related services, excluding transportation. The special school district may contract with a sending district for transportation, or the sending district may provide transportation on its own. (Section 167.895) The act outlines school districts' responsibilities for the provision of special education and related services to students with disabilities. A special school district shall continue to provide special education and related services, excluding transportation, to students with disabilities who transfer to another school within the special school district. If the sending district is a metropolitan school district, it shall remain responsible for providing special education and related services, including transportation, to students with disabilities who transfer to a receiving district. A special school district in an adjoining county to a metropolitan school district may contract with the metropolitan school district for the reimbursement of special education and related services provided by the special school district for transfer students. A receiving district that is not part of a special school district shall not be responsible for providing transportation to transfer students, regardless of whether transportation is identified as a related service within a student's individualized education program. A sending district may contract with a receiving district that is not part of a special school district for transportation of students with disabilities. A seven-director or urban school district may contract with a receiving district that is not part of a special school district in the same or an adjoining county for the reimbursement of special education and related services provided by the receiving district. (Section 167.895) This act is identical to SB 971 (2026) and similar to SCS/SBs 215 & 70 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/10/2026
S - Superseded by SB 971

SB909 Renames the "Missouri Student Religious Liberties Act" the "Missouri Safeguarding Personal Expression at K-12 Schools (SPEAKS) Act" and creates provisions safeguarding students' political and ideological expression at public schools
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 909 - This act renames the "Missouri Student Religious Liberties Act" the "Missouri Safeguarding Personal Expression at K-12 Schools (SPEAKS) Act". The act adds political and ideological expression to the current protections for public school students' religious expression. The act additionally prohibits discrimination against student clubs on the basis of their religious, political, or ideological viewpoints or any requirement that the members of the club adhere to the club's sincerely held beliefs, comply with the club's conduct standards, or further the club's mission, as such mission is defined by the club. This act shall not be construed to limit school districts' ability to restrict speech that is not protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States; speech that is so offensive that a student is effectively denied equal access to educational opportunities; or conduct that intentionally, materially, and substantially disrupts school operations or the expressive activity of another individual in a campus space exclusively reserved for such activity. Any person or student organization harmed by a violation of this act shall have a private cause of action against the school, as described in the act. Any person or student organization aggrieved by a violation of this act may assert such violation as a defense or counterclaim in any disciplinary action or in any civil or administrative proceeding. The state waives immunity and consents to be sued in federal court for claims arising under this act. This act is substantially similar to HB 2682 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/29/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

SB913 Modifies provisions relating to tax credits
Sponsor Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R)
Summary
SS SB 913 -- TAX CREDITS This bill extends the sunset or expiration from 2028 to 2033 for the: (1) Wood Energy Tax Credit; (2) Meat Processing Facility Investment Tax Credit; (3) Higher Ethanol Fuel Tax Credit; (4) Biodiesel Retail Sale Tax Credit; (5) Biodiesel Production Tax Credit; (6) Urban Farms Tax Credit; (7) Rolling Stock Tax Credit; (8) Agricultural Production Tax Credit; and (9) Specialty Agricultural Crops Act. The bill provides that, as it relates to biodiesel retail sale tax credit, a taxpayer must not be liable for penalties or interest on an income tax balance due if such taxpayer is denied part or all of the tax credit to which the taxpayer has qualified due to lack of available funds, and such denial causes a balance- due notice to be generated by the Department of Revenue or any other redeeming agency. Such taxpayer must pay the balance due within 60 days or be subject to penalties and interest pursuant to current law. This bill establishes the Railroad Infrastructure Tax Credit. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this bill authorizes a tax credit in the amount of 50% of an eligible taxpayer's qualified railroad expenditures and qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures, as those terms are defined in the bill. A tax credit for qualified railroad expenditures must not exceed $5,000 multiplied by the number of miles of railroad track owned or leased in the state by a railroad, and the total amount of tax credits for qualified railroad expenditures authorized in a calendar year must not exceed $4.5 million. A tax credit for qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures must not exceed $1 million for each new rail-served customer project, and the total amount of tax credits for qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures authorized in a calendar year must not exceed $5 million. An eligible taxpayer must submit a certificate of eligibility to the Department of Economic Development after the completion of the qualified railroad expenditures or qualified new rail infrastructure expenditures. Tax credits authorized in these provisions will not be refundable, but can be carried forward for up to five subsequent tax years. Tax credits can be transferred as described in the bill. This tax credit sunsets on December 31, 2032.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/09/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

SB919 Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 919 - This act modifies several provisions relating to property taxes.   CLASSIFICATION OF PROPERTY This act prohibits an assessor from reclassifying real property without first conducting an in-person consultation with the owner of record of such property. An assessor shall be deemed to be in compliance with this provision if the assessor can document a good-faith effort to contact the owner of record, as described in the act. (Section 137.016)   REAL PROPERTY ASSESSED VALUES Current law provides that an assessor shall not increase the assessed valuation of any parcel of residential real property by more than fifteen percent since the last reassessment without first conducting a physical inspection of the property and providing notice to the taxpayer. This act modifies such provision by prohibiting any increase in assessments of residential real property in excess of fifteen percent. Additionally, a property owner may request the assessor to conduct a physical inspection, provided that the assessed value shall not increase as a result of such inspection. (Section 137.115.10)   REAL PROPERTY TAX CREDIT Current law authorizes certain counties to provide a tax credit for the property tax liabilities owed on an eligible taxpayer's homestead. This act repeals such provision and instead provides that all counties shall provide a property tax credit for any real property owned by an eligible taxpayer, provided that the real property tax liability owed on the taxpayer's real property may be increased by no more than 2.5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is less. However, for any county in which any subclass of real property is considered to be valued below its true value in money, as determined in the act, the amount by which a taxpayer's real property tax liability may increase shall not exceed 5% per year, provided that this provision shall no longer apply to a county once such subclass of real property in such county is no longer considered to be valued below its true value in money.   Additionally, the act provides that no personal property tax liability owed on any individual item of personal property shall not be increased above the liability owed on such item during the 2024 tax year or the first year an eligible taxpayer first incurs personal property tax liability on such personal property, whichever occurs later. Any eligible taxpayer experiencing such an increase shall be eligible for a credit on the eligible taxpayer's personal property tax liability in an amount equal to such increase, as described in the act. (Sections 137.1058 and 137.1055)   STATE TAX COMMISSION RATIO STUDIES Current law requires the State Tax Commission to equalize the valuation of each class and subclass of property among the respective counties. This act requires the Commission to utilize ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass is valued below or above its true value. Such values shall be no less than 75% and no more than 100% of true market value, as described in the act. (Section 138.390) JOSHUA NORBERG  
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/28/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB923 Repeals provisions authorizing the establishment of charter schools in Boone County
Sponsor Sen. Stephen Webber (D)
Summary
SB 923 - This act repeals provisions authorizing the establishment of charter schools in Boone County. This act is identical to SB 88 (2025) and HB 298 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB932 Modifies provisions relating to workers' compensation
Sponsor Sen. Sandy Crawford (R)
Summary
SB 932 - Current law allows the Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation to impose taxes or surcharges for different purposes relating to the administration of workers' compensation, with such tax rate being rounded up to the nearest one-half of a percentage point. This act requires the tax or surcharge rates to instead be rounded up to the nearest one-tenth of a percentage point.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/24/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Insurance and Banking

SB936 Reauthorizes an income tax deduction for certain savings accounts
Sponsor Sen. Mike Cierpiot (R)
Summary
SB 936 - Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for one hundred percent of a participating taxpayer's contributions to a long-term dignity savings account, with such deduction scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2024. This act extends the sunset on the deduction until December 31, 2031. This act is identical to SB 102 (2025) and SB 1010 (2024), and to a provision in SS/SB 59 (2025) and SCS/HCS/HB 1483 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB941 Modifies provisions relating to gaming
Sponsor Sen. Justin Brown (R)
Summary
SB 941 - This act modifies provisions relating to gaming.ILLEGAL GAMING This act establishes the "Illegal Gaming Enforcement Fund", which shall consist of a portion of revenues generated from an administrative fee imposed on video lottery terminals authorized by the act. Moneys in the fund shall be used by the Attorney General, prosecutors, and law enforcement to investigate, enforce, charge, and prosecute illegal gaming in this state. (Section 27.180) Current law authorizes the superintendent of the Highway Patrol to enter into an agreement with the Missouri Gaming Commission to enforce laws relating to gaming. This act authorizes the superintendent to also enter into such an agreement with the Missouri Lottery Commission. (Section 43.050) The act modifies the definition of "advance gambling activity" to include conduct directed toward the creation or establishment of a gambling device. The act also provides that the term "gambling" does not include video lottery gaming authorized by the act. (Sections 572.010 and 572.100) This act provides that, for constitutionally authorized raffles, such raffles shall use tickets, a device, or a machine where a person or persons buy one or more changes from a finite number of draws for a prize. Such machine shall be certified as provided in the act. (Section 572.015) This provision is substantially similar to a provision in SB 643 (2022), SB 764 (2022), SB 906 (2022), HB 2080 (2022), and HB 2541 (2022), and is similar to a provision in SB 632 (2022), SB 1237 (2022), and HB 2910 (2022). This act establishes the "Missouri Gaming Bureau" within the Department of Public Safety. The director of the Bureau shall be a uniformed member of the Highway Patrol, and the Bureau may contract with the Missouri Gaming Commission and the Missouri Lottery Commission for criminal and regulatory investigations involving excursion gambling boats and video lottery gaming authorized by the act. Members of the Bureau shall be paid from funds designated as administrative within the State Lottery Fund. (Section 650.930)STATE LOTTERY Current law prohibits the state lottery from approving any lottery game based on the outcome of sporting events. This act repeals such prohibition, provided that the maximum ticket price shall not exceed five dollars per ticket. Additionally, the act authorizes the Lottery Commission to use an internet application to sell electronic scratcher games, draw games, and pull-tab games where a player may access such application using a personal device. (Sections 313.205 and 313.230)VIDEO LOTTERY GAMING This act establishes the Honoring Missouri Veterans and Supporting Missouri Education Act. This act allows the State Lottery Commission to implement a system of video lottery game terminals and to issue licenses to video lottery game manufacturers, distributors, operators, handlers, and retailers. The Commission shall not allow a single vendor or licensee to be responsible for implementing the program. (313.429.1) Video lottery game terminals may be placed in any video lottery game retailer's location, as such term is defined in the act. (Section 313.427) Video lottery game terminals shall be connected to a centralized computer system developed or procured by the Commission. No video lottery game terminal shall be placed in operation without first being connected to such centralized computer system. Video lottery game terminals shall meet the standards provided for in the act. (Section 313.429.2(14)) The Commission may impose a non-refundable application fee, as described in the act. The initial license shall be for a period of one year. Thereafter, the license renewal period shall be four years with the applicable license renewal fee paid for each year such license is renewed, as described in the act. In addition to such license fees, video lottery game operators shall pay the Commission an annual administrative fee of $1,000 for each video lottery game terminal placed in service. No license shall be issued to any person who has been convicted of a felony or crime involving illegal gambling. (Section 313.429.3) Video lottery game operators and video lottery game retailers shall enter into a use agreement for the placement of video lottery game terminals, as described in the act. The agreement shall specify an equal division of net terminal income after adjustments for taxes and administrative fees are made. Video lottery game operators and video lottery game retailers are prohibited from offering anything of value other than the percentage of adjusted gross receipts for the placement of video lottery terminals. (Section 313.429.4) Video lottery game operators shall pay winning tickets using a video lottery game ticket redemption terminal, which shall be located within the video lottery game retailer's establishment in direct proximity of where such video lottery games are offered. Unredeemed video lottery game tickets shall expire after 180 days of issue. (Section 313.429.8) The price of video lottery game terminal credits shall be determined by the Commission, and the maximum wager played per video lottery game shall not exceed $4.00. No cash award for the maximum wager played on any individual lottery game shall exceed one dollar less than the maximum amount allowable by federal law before tax withholding is required. (Section 313.429.10(1)) Operators shall not operate more than eight terminals at any one video lottery game retailer location. (Section 313.429.10(2)) A person under the age of twenty-one shall not play video lottery games. Video lottery game operators shall have a video surveillance system within the immediate area of the retailer's establishment where video lottery game terminals are located. (Section 313.429.11(1) and (2)) Video lottery game operators shall pay to the Commission thirty-four percent of the video lottery game adjusted gross gaming revenue. The Commission shall transfer ten percent of the adjusted gross gaming revenue tax to the cities and counties in which video lottery gaming terminals are located. (Section 313.429.12) The Commission shall procure a centralized computer system no later than 180 days following the effective date of the act, and shall establish start and operational dates as described in the act. (Section 313.431) Participation in the state lottery under this act shall not be construed to be a lottery or gift enterprise in violation of Article III, Section 39 of the Constitution of Missouri. (Section 313.433) This act allows municipalities and counties to adopt ordinances permitting or prohibiting video lottery game terminals within the municipality or the unincorporated area of the county. (Section 313.435) These provisions are identical to HCS/HB 970 (2025), are substantially similar to SB 16 (2025), SB 73 (2025), SB 112 (2025), SB 192 (2023), SB 557 (2023), SB 574 (2023), HB 699 (2023), SB 642 (2022), SB 686 (2022), SB 19 (2021), SB 319 (2021), HB 1014 (2021), SB 566 (2020), SB 43 (2019), and SB 452 (2017), and to provisions in SB 824 (2024), SB 1083 (2024), SB 1021 (2024), HB 2921 (2024), SB 1 (2023), SB 906 (2022), SS/HCS/HBs 2502 & 2556 (2022), HB 2080 (2022), SCS/SB 98 (2021), HB 915 (2021), SS#3/SCS/SB 44 (2019), and SS/SCS/SB 767 (2018), and are similar to HB 990 (2017).EXCURSION GAMBLING BOAT ADMISSION FEE Current law requires excursion gambling boat licensees to pay an admission fee of $2 per person, with $1 deposited to the Gaming Commission Fund and the remaining $1 paid to the home dock city or county. This act increases such fee to $4 per person, and allocates the additional $2 to the Missouri Veterans Commission. (Section 313.820) This act is substantially similar to HCS/HB 970 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
S - Re-referred to committee - Senate-Select Committee on Gaming

SB948 Provides that parents shall have the fundamental right to direct the upbringing, education, health care, and mental health of their children free from government interference
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SS/SB 948 - This act provides that a parent has a fundamental right to direct the upbringing, education, health care, and mental health of such parent's child free from government interference. A governmental authority shall not restrict parental rights unless such authority demonstrates that the restriction is essential to further a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling interest. This provision applies to all state and local laws, resolutions, and ordinances and to the implementation of such laws, resolutions, and ordinances. (Section 1.390) The act outlines certain parental rights that are exclusively reserved to a parent without obstruction by or interference from this state, any political subdivision of the state, any governmental entity, or any other institution. Under the act, parents shall have the right to: (1) Direct the education of the child; (2) Access and review all written and electronic educational records of the child; (3) Direct the child's upbringing; (4) Direct the child's moral or religious training; (5) Consent in writing to all physical and mental health care decisions for the child; (6) Access and review all health and medical records of the child; (7) Consent in writing before a biometric scan of the child is made, shared, or stored; (8) Consent in writing before any record of the child's blood or DNA is created, stored, or shared, unless authorized pursuant to a court order; (9) Consent in writing before any governmental authority makes a video or voice recording of the child, unless, without abrogating rights secured under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, such recording is made as part of an event or circumstance described in the act; (10) Be notified promptly if a governmental authority suspects that abuse, neglect, or a criminal offense has been committed against the child, unless such notification is reasonably believed to be likely to endanger the life or physical safety of the child; (11) Opt the child out of any personal analysis, evaluation, survey, or data collection by a school district except what is necessary and essential for establishing a student's educational record for a student of the school district; (12) Excuse a child from school attendance for religious purposes; (13) Participate in parent-teacher organizations and other school organizations that are sanctioned by the board of education of a school district; (14) Receive, upon first contact with a representative of the Department of Social Services, an accurate written itemization containing all details of allegations of child abuse or neglect of the child, excluding only the name of the person who made the allegations; and (15) View a publicly available, easily accessible accounting of all financial transactions conducted with school district funds without being required to submit a formal request or otherwise make direct contact with the school district to access such information. Except for law enforcement personnel, a governmental authority shall not encourage or coerce a child to withhold information from the child's parent; nor shall a governmental authority withhold from a child's parent information that is relevant to the physical, emotional, or mental health of the child. A parent who believes his or her rights have been violated under this act may assert that violation as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding, regardless of whether the government is a party to the proceeding, and obtain appropriate relief against the government, including declaratory relief, injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and reasonable attorney's fees and costs. (Section 1.391) Additionally, each school district shall maintain an easily accessible online record of all money the district receives and spends. Each public school within a school district shall prominently link to the district's financial ledger on the school's own website. (Section 162.192) This provision is identical to SB 1029 (2026). The act additionally repeals provisions authorizing minors to consent to medical treatment or procedures involving venereal disease and drug or substance abuse. (Section 431.061) This act is similar to HB 2426 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/02/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB950 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Mike Moon (R)
Summary
SB 950 - This act modifies several provisions relating to taxation.INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act reduces the top rate of tax by 0.17%. Such reduction in the top rate of tax shall only occur if one or more institutions is subject to the tax on the endowments of higher education institutions imposed under this act. (Section 143.011)HIGHER EDUCATION ENDOWMENT TAX For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act imposes a tax on the endowments of qualifying institutions of higher education at a rate of 1.9% of the aggregate fair market value of the assets of such endowments. The tax shall apply to the endowments, as defined in the act, of higher education institutions that 1) are affiliated with, or provide medical faculty to, any abortion facility, 2) offer specific medical residencies or fellowships that offer training in performing or inducing abortions, or 3) support in any manner any abortion facility where abortions are performed or induced when not necessary to save the life of the mother. Any institution that becomes a qualifying institution of higher education on or after January 1, 2027, shall remain subject to the tax imposed by the act regardless of whether such institution no longer meets the definition of qualifying institution of higher education as defined in the act. All revenues generated by the endowment tax shall be deposited in the General Revenue Fund. (Section 146.200) This act is identical to SB 27 (2025), SB 1143 (2024), HB 2114 (2024), SB 290 (2023), SB 892 (2022), HB 1874 (2022), SB 451 (2021), and HB 302 (2021), and is substantially similar to HB 1332 (2023), SCS/SB 574 (2020), and SCS/SB 188 (2019).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws

SB962 Requires schools that receive state funds to give students excused absences for attending scheduled elections with their parents
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 962 - This act provides that a student enrolled in a school that receives state funds shall not be considered absent for the time such student spends attending a scheduled primary, general, or special election with his or her parent, legal guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to the student. A student may received only one excused absence during each scheduled election. Upon his or her return to school, the student shall be encouraged by school officials to demonstrate his or her attendance at the election by wearing an official sticker, badge, or other item indicating that he or she attended the election. This act is identical to SB 344 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB963 Requires school districts and charter schools to offer students who are 17 1/2 years old the opportunity to register to vote
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 963 - At least twice during each school year, this act requires school districts and charter schools to offer students who are at least 17 1/2 years old the opportunity to register to vote. The first opportunity shall occur during school hours on the fourth Tuesday in September. The second opportunity shall occur at a later time and shall be conducted by the local election authority in whose jurisdiction the school district or charter school is located. The school district or charter school shall coordinate with the local election authority to provide the second voter registration activity. The Secretary of State shall prepare materials regarding voter registration to be distributed at each voter registration activity conducted pursuant to the provisions of the act. Each school district and charter school shall file a report regarding voter registration activities with the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education by December 31 of each year.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB966 Requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to ensure that safety assessments are conducted on all public schools located in St. Louis City or St. Louis County
Sponsor Sen. Angela Mosley (D)
Summary
SB 966 - This act requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to ensure that every public school and public charter school located in St. Louis City or St. Louis County conducts an annual safety assessment of such public school or public charter school. The Department of Public Safety (DPS), local law enforcement, and local emergency services shall provide reasonable assistance to public schools and public charter schools in order to implement the provisions of the act. The safety assessments shall include a consideration of each school's vulnerabilities to school shootings and intruders, with specific reference to the implementation of various safety procedures, policies, and tools specified in the act. Each public school and public charter school that conducts an annual safety assessment pursuant to the provisions of the act shall provide a report of the findings of the safety assessment to DESE. Based upon the findings of the safety assessments, DESE, in conjunction with DPS, shall provide to each public school and public charter school an annual report that summarizes such school's safety vulnerabilities, along with recommendations for mitigating such vulnerabilities. Such report shall also be provided to the General Assembly. A report created pursuant to the provisions of this act shall not be considered a public record under the Sunshine Law and shall not be available for public inspection. This act shall become effective July 1, 2028. This act is identical to SB 42 (2025) and similar to SCS/SB 1153 (2024) and HB 2398 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB967 Establishes the Black History Education and Awareness Act and designates the first week in February as Black History Week
Sponsor Sen. Angela Mosley (D)
Summary
SB 967 - This act establishes the Black History Education and Awareness Commission Act and creates a permanent state commission known as the Black History Education and Awareness Commission, which shall be housed in the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). The Commission shall promote implementation of education and awareness programs relating to the history, experiences, and achievements of black people in Missouri and across the country. The Commission shall be composed of 13 members, with 10 members appointed by the Governor with the advice and consent of the Senate. The act describes the members of the Commission, including the Commissioner of Education, the President of Harris-Stowe State University, and representatives of civil rights groups, racial justice organizations, and black professional organizations. Certain members of the Commission shall serve three-year terms, with their terms staggered as provided in the act. The act designates the first week in February as "Black History Week". Instruction relating to Black History Week shall be taught to students in 6th grade and up during a week determined by each school district. The act lists the topics that shall be covered in such instruction, such as chattel slavery in the United States, the Civil Rights Movement, and significant black people in American history. DESE shall develop a curriculum framework of instruction for studying black history based on the instructional topics specified in the act. Beginning in the 2027-2028 school year, DESE shall conduct a pilot program to test the impact of the curriculum framework. The pilot program shall include up to 25 school districts or schools within a district. Participating districts and schools shall determine the minimum amount of instruction time that qualifies as a unit of instruction satisfying the requirements of the act and shall provide a plan of professional development for teachers. Upon completion of the pilot program, DESE shall report the results to the General Assembly. The curriculum framework shall be made available to all school districts beginning in the 2028-2029 school year, and all school districts shall participate in Black History Week by the 2029-2030 school year. This act is identical to SB 132 (2025) and similar to SB 1432 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/22/2026
S - Removed from Senate Hearing Agenda - 4/23/26 - 9:30 am - SCR 2 - Senate-Education

SB971 Establishes provisions relating to student transfers to nonresident districts
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SCS/SBs 971 & 906 - This act establishes the "Public School Open Enrollment Act" to enable students to transfer from their charter school or resident school district ("resident local education agency" or "LEA") to a nonresident LEA. (Section 167.1200) No student shall be enrolled under the Public School Open Enrollment Act before July 1, 2028. (Section 167.1230)TRANSFER POLICY AND PARTICIPATION (Section 167.1205) Any student in kindergarten to grade 12 may attend school in a nonresident LEA participating in the open enrollment program. Before November 1st of each year, each charter school or school district, defined as a "local education agency" or "LEA", shall adopt a resolution stating whether the LEA intends to participate in the program by receiving transferring students during the subsequent school year. LEAs may restrict the number of students who may transfer to a nonresident LEA to 3% of the previous school year's enrollment. After the 2028-29 school year, an LEA's maximum number of students who may transfer to a nonresident LEA shall increase by 1% for every two consecutive school years that the LEA is at the transfer maximum, up to a potential maximum of 5% of the previous school year's enrollment. For purposes of calculating the transfer maximum, a transferring student shall be counted as enrolled in the resident LEA if, in the school year before the year of transfer, the student was enrolled in a school other than a public school, attended an FPE school, as such term is defined in current law, or moved to Missouri from another state and has not yet enrolled in school. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) shall develop and maintain an online resource that allows a nonresident LEA to ensure that such LEA does not accept a transfer application if doing so would cause the transferring student's resident LEA to exceed the transfer maximum established in the act. The online resource shall additionally provide a searchable public database of the number of transfers offered in each participating LEA, listing allowable transfers for each building, grade level, classroom, and program in an LEA. LEAs shall not be required to add teachers, staff, or classrooms to accommodate transfer applicants. DESE or an entity skilled in policy development shall develop a model open enrollment transfer policy as outlined in the act, including specific standards for acceptance and rejection of transfer applications. All LEAs that participate in open enrollment shall adopt a policy that defines the term "insufficient classroom space," taking into account future population growth and establishing standards for acceptance and rejection of transfer applications. The standards for acceptance and rejection of transfer applications may include the capacity of the school, the availability of classroom space, and any class-size limitation. An LEA may use projections to determine class-size limitations. The standards shall include a statement that priority shall be given to any applicant who has a sibling who is already enrolled in the nonresident LEA. The standards shall not include a consideration of an applicant's academic achievement, athletic ability, disabilities, English proficiency level, or previous disciplinary proceedings, except that any suspension or expulsion from another LEA shall be included. LEAs receiving transferring students shall not discriminate on the basis of gender, national origin, race, ethnicity, ancestry, religion, disability, or whether the student is homeless or a migrant. A nonresident LEA shall accept credits toward graduation that were awarded by another LEA and award a diploma to a transferring student if the student meets the nonresident LEA's graduation requirements. The governing body of each LEA shall cause certain information about the open enrollment program, such as application deadlines and procedures, to be posted on the LEA's website and in the student handbook. Students who wish to attend a nonresident LEA that has an academic or competitive entrance process shall furnish proof that they meet the admission requirements of the nonresident LEA. A nonresident LEA may deny a transfer to a student who, in the most recent school year, has been suspended from school two or more times or who has been suspended or expelled for an act of school violence, as described in the act. A student whose transfer is initially precluded under this provision may, upon the approval of the nonresident LEA, be permitted to transfer as a probationary student, subject to no further disruptive behavior. A student who is denied a transfer due to disciplinary issues has the right to an in-person meeting with the nonresident LEA's superintendent, as provided in the act. LEAs shall develop common standards for determining disruptive behavior that shall include criteria established in current law. High school students who participate in open enrollment shall be ineligible to participate in interscholastic athletics during the first 365 days of enrollment in a nonresident LEA, with exceptions outlined in the act.APPLYING FOR TRANSFER (Section 167.1210) A student who applies for a transfer under the act may accept only one transfer per school year. A student who accepts such a transfer shall commit to attend and take all courses through the nonresident LEA for at least two school years. The student may meet with the superintendent of the nonresident LEA to be released from such commitment if extenuating circumstances arise or if the student's resident LEA changes. A transferring student shall not enroll as a full-time student in the Missouri Course Access and Virtual School Program. A student who transfers to a nonresident LEA and then returns to the resident LEA shall complete a full semester in the resident LEA before applying for another transfer. A transferring student with a school attendance rate below 80% for any quarter shall be notified of such rate, and if such student's attendance rate in the subsequent quarter does not reach at least 90%, the student's transfer and eligibility to attend the nonresident LEA may be voided by the LEA. A student who transfers to a nonresident LEA may complete all remaining school years in the nonresident LEA without reapplying each year. Any sibling of a student enrolled in a nonresident LEA may enroll in the same nonresident LEA if the LEA has the capacity and the sibling has no discipline issues, as provided in the act. The transferring student or the student's parent is responsible for the transportation of the student to and from the boundaries of the nonresident LEA in which the student is enrolled. Nonresident LEAs shall provide transportation within the boundaries of the LEA, but charter schools that do not currently provide transportation services are exempt from this requirement. Transportation costs shall included in the nonresident LEA's calculation for transportation reimbursement under current law. For the purposes of determining federal and state aid, a student who transfers to a nonresident school district LEA shall be counted as a resident of the nonresident LEA. For a student transferring to a nonresident charter school LEA, state aid for such student shall be determined by multiplying the weighted average daily attendance of such transferring student by the state adequacy target and multiplying this product by the dollar-value modifier, as the terms "weighted average daily attendance", "state adequacy target", and "dollar-value modifier" are defined in current law, and certain provisions of state law providing for state aid payments to charter schools shall not apply to such calculation. For purposes of payment to special school districts, a transferring student receiving services from a special school district shall be counted as a resident pupil of the nonresident LEA in which the student is enrolled. If a student receives 50% or more of such student's instruction from the special school district, the special school district shall receive all funding which would otherwise be paid to the nonresident LEA for such student. The provisions of the act shall not be construed to relieve any resident LEA of its responsibility to pay toward the cost of the education of children who receive special educational services or attend the Missouri Schools for the Severely Disabled, as provided in current law.PARENT PUBLIC SCHOOL CHOICE FUND (Sections 167.1211 and 167.1212) The act establishes the "Parent Public School Choice Fund". Appropriations to the fund shall be used to supplement state aid payments to LEAs that participate in the open enrollment program and reimburse nonresident LEAs for the costs of providing special educational services for students with an IEP, as provided in the act. DESE shall annually evaluate the availability and use of moneys from the fund and, if necessary, request additional funds by a specific line item appropriation as part of the legislative budget process.NUMBER OF TRANSFER STUDENTS (Section 167.1215) Before November 1st annually, each LEA shall publish and notify DESE of the number of transfer students the LEA is willing to receive for the following school year, delineated by building, grade, classroom, or program, if such criteria for acceptance have been set by the LEA. An LEA shall not be required to accept any transfer students above this published number. A special school district shall consult with each partner school district and, before November 1st annually, shall notify DESE of the number of likely available spots for special education services at each partner school district, as provided in the act. The online resource created by DESE shall include a waiting list for applications to nonresident LEAs. The online resource shall notify each applicant that the applicant's transfer application may be subject to placement on such waiting list if the number of transfer applications exceeds the number of available transfers. The act sets forth a priority order for acceptance of applications from the waiting list. A parent of a student on the waiting list shall be informed by DESE of the details of the operation of the list and whether the parent will be required to refile an application for open enrollment in order to remain on the waiting list.APPLICATION PROCESS (Section 167.1220) The parent of a student seeking a transfer shall submit an application to DESE between November 15th and January 1st of the school year before the school year in which the student seeks to begin the fall semester, as provided in the act. No more than five transfer applications per school year shall be submitted for any student. Upon receiving an application, DESE shall assign a unique identifying number to the application. On or before January 15th, DESE shall conduct a lottery of eligible applications to determine which student transfers DESE will approve for submission to the nonresident LEAs, subject to conditions set forth in the act, and shall also notify each nonresident LEA of applications that DESE has approved for transfer. The governing body of the nonresident LEA shall request from all schools attended by the student within the last 12 months certain records relating to the transfer, including special education records, discipline records, and records of behavioral risk assessments. An LEA that receives such a request for records shall respond to the request within five business days. Any official to whom such information is disclosed shall comply with the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act. Nonresident LEAs shall review and make a determination on transfer applications received from DESE within 10 business days, as provided in the act. If a nonresident LEA rejects an application, DESE shall submit the next application on the waiting list to the nonresident LEA for consideration. Before March 1st of the school year preceding the school year in which a student seeks to enroll in a nonresident LEA, the nonresident LEA's superintendent shall notify DESE as to whether the student's application has been accepted or rejected through the online resource created by DESE. Within three business days of sending notifications to the resident and nonresident LEAs, DESE shall notify the parent as to whether the student's application has been accepted or rejected, as provided in the act. If an application is rejected, DESE's notification shall state the nonresident LEA's reason for the rejection. If an application is accepted, DESE shall state in its notification a reasonable deadline before which the student shall enroll, along with instructions for renewing enrollment each year. DESE shall also notify the resident LEA of the student's participation. DESE shall further notify the student and the student's parent of the opportunity to participate in an anonymous survey provided by DESE regarding all reasons for the student's and parent's interest in participating in the open enrollment program. DESE shall publish an annual report based on the survey results, providing aggregate data of sufficient detail to allow analysis of trends regarding the reasons for participation in the open enrollment program at the statewide, regional, and local levels. The annual report shall also include detection and analysis of the impact of the program on racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic balance among schools and LEAs. No such survey results shall be published in a manner that would allow for the identification of data attributable to a specific LEA or that reveals information regarding a group of five or fewer students. DESE shall privately share data specific to each LEA with each LEA prior to publishing the annual report. If a student declines enrolling in the nonresident LEA, provided the nonresident LEA still has capacity to accept additional students, DESE shall send the LEA the next application on the waiting list for consideration. No additional open enrollment transfer applications shall be sent by DESE or approved by a nonresident LEA after April 15th of the school year immediately preceding the school year of enrollment. SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL NEEDS AND GIFTED CHILDREN (Section 167.1224) Before enrolling in a nonresident LEA, a student with certain special educational needs, English as a second language (ESL) needs, or who is identified as a gifted child shall be provided the same process that exists for a resident student moving into the nonresident LEA. The nonresident LEA, parent, or both shall have the opportunity to reevaluate the student to determine what comparable special educational services may be required or what programs or services for which the student may be eligible. A nonresident LEA is responsible for providing a free appropriate education to the student and shall provide the same or substantially similar services as a resident student would receive. Before enrolling in the nonresident LEA, if necessary, a transferring student and parent shall be provided the opportunity to develop a new or amended IEP, individualized family service plan, or 504 plan, or to evaluate the ESL, gifted, or dyslexia programs and services provided by the nonresident LEA. The nonresident LEA shall provide the student and parent with prior written notice documenting the services that the nonresident LEA determines appropriate to meet the student's needs. The nonresident LEA shall offer the transferring student 10 business days to accept or decline the acceptance of the nonresident LEA. LEAs that are served by a special school district shall execute a form agreement prepared by DESE with such special school district regarding finance, staffing, and other relevant items prior to participating in open enrollment. An LEA and a special school district may choose to modify such form agreement, but no modifications shall delay the LEA's participating in open enrollment. A nonresident LEA shall make reasonable accommodations to address the needs of incoming transferring students and to provide such students with equal access to a free appropriate public education. These provisions shall not be construed to preclude a nonresident LEA from adding additional staff, services, or programs, or to preclude the nonresident LEA from performing subsequent evaluations to ensure proper placement of a transferring student.AUTHORIZED EXEMPTIONS (Section 167.1225) A student may participate in open enrollment if such student's transfer does not cause the resident LEA to conflict with a provision of an enforceable desegregation court order or a court-approved desegregation plan. An LEA may annually declare an exemption from the program if the LEA is subject to such court order or plan, as provided in the act. Any LEA declaring such exemption shall notify DESE of such before November 1st of the preceding school year. The act sets forth certain exemptions from open enrollment for students who qualify for transfers under current law and for LEAs that receive transfer students under such provisions. If a student transfers from a resident LEA that is a K-8 school district to another school district for any of grades 6-8, the resident LEA shall pay tuition to the nonresident LEA upon the student's promotion to 9th grade as provided in current law. For any student who transfers to a nonresident LEA that is a K-8 school district, the K-8 school district shall not be considered such student's resident LEA for any purpose after the student completes 8th grade or upon the student's transfer out of the K-8 school district before completing 8th grade.ANNUAL REPORTING AND AUDITING (Section 167.1229) DESE shall collect and report data annually from school LEAs on the number of applications and study the effects of transfers under the act. DESE shall consider, as part of its study, the maximum number of transfers and exemptions for both resident and nonresident LEAs for up to two years to determine if a significant racially segregative impact has occurred in any LEA. The report shall be submitted annually before December 1st to the Joint Committee on Education, the House Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education, and the Senate Committee on Education. DESE shall annually make a random selection of 10% of the LEAs participating in the open enrollment program and audit each selected LEA's transfers approved or denied under policies adopted by the school board. If DESE determines that a selected LEA is improperly implementing and administering the transfer process, DESE may withhold any state aid provided to the LEA until the LEA corrects the transfer process improprieties identified by the audit. This act is substantially similar to provisions in SS/SCS/HCS/HB 711 (2025) and HCS#2/SS/SB 266 (2025), and is similar to HB 2604 (2026), SB 1051 (2024), HCS/HB 1989 (2024), SCS/SB 5 (2023), SB 1010 (2022), HB 1814 (2022), and HS/HCS/HB 543 (2021).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/03/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB978 Requires school districts and charter schools to provide instruction on human growth and development
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 978 - Beginning in the 2026-27 school year and continuing in subsequent school years, any instruction on human sexuality provided by a school district or charter school shall include a human growth and development discussion. Such discussion shall include a video illustrating the development of vital organs in early fetal development, as well as a video illustrating the process of fertilization and every stage of human development inside the uterus throughout pregnancy until birth. Additionally, each school district and charter school shall require instruction in human growth and development beginning no later than third grade. Provisions of state law requiring the formation of a work group to develop academic standards shall not apply to this instruction. The instruction shall include certain scientific facts and information listed in the act, including videos illustrating the development of vital organs in early fetal development and every stage of human development inside the uterus throughout pregnancy until birth. The instruction shall teach that at conception, a new human being is formed, and abortion ends the life of an unborn child. The medicinal emphasis on the heartbeat during gestation shall also be covered, along with the ability to hear an unborn child's heartbeat using a fetal heart rate device. Placental development, brain waves, reflex responses, and sensory receptors are also required instructional topics. The instruction shall teach that the predominant abortion method in Missouri is dilation and evacuation, which includes the dismemberment, disarticulation, and exsanguination of an unborn child, causing the unborn child's death. Instruction in human development shall be delivered in an age-appropriate manner. Parents shall be notified of the contents of such instruction and shall be given the opportunity to remove their child from class during such instruction. The Attorney General may bring a civil action for damages, injunctive relief, or both, against any person or entity who violates any provision of this act. This act is similar to SB 1198 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/10/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

SB982 Modifies provisions relating to the sex offender registry
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
HCS SB 982 -- SEXUAL OFFENSES This bill prohibits a person from changing his or her name for the period of time the person is required to register on the sex offender registry. If a person required to register had a prior legal name that was used on or after the date of conviction, that name must be reported as an alias. A person required to register must also register under his or her biological sex. This bill modifies provisions relating to the sex offender registry. Instead of listing certain sexual offenses, this bill provides that any person who, since July 1, 1979, has been or is adjudicated for a tier I offense, tier II offense, or tier III offense in this state or in any other state, territory, the District of Columbia, foreign country, or federal, tribal or military jurisdiction will be required to register as a sex offender. Offenders will be classified as a tier I, tier II, or tier III offender. To the extent more than one tier definition applies, the highest tier will be the applicable tier for the offender. This bill also provides that certain juvenile offenders and certain offenders who live or work in Missouri with registration requirements by other jurisdictions will be assigned a tier, which will be only for the purposes of registration appearance frequency and removal eligibility. The initial determination as to the tier will be made by the registration official and the Missouri State Highway Patrol (MSHP) will analyze the tier designation for accuracy. This bill additionally provides that any sex offender with a primary residence outside of Missouri who has a temporary residence in Missouri in which he or she resides for more than a part-time period must register for the duration of the offender's temporary residency. This bill also provides that a nonresident sex offender who works or is a nonresident student in this state must register in the county where the status requiring registration occurs for the duration of the offender's employment or attendance at any school of higher education as long as the status requiring registration remains active. The jurisdiction, in addition to the Attorney General, can certify appropriate sex offender treatment programs for purposes of reductions in registration periods. Additionally, if records of program completion are unavailable and completion of the program was required as a term of probation, an order discharging the sex offender from probation or another record acknowledging satisfactory completion of probation will constitute prima facie evidence of successful completion. This bill modifies provisions relating to removal from registration for a person required to register because of an offense adjudicated in another jurisdiction. The person must file the petition for removal, termination, or relief from registration, or the declaratory judgment providing for removal, termination, or relief according to the laws of the adjudicating jurisdiction. Upon the entry of a judgment, rather than the grant of a petition for removal, providing that the person is no longer required to register, the judgment can be registered in this State by providing the information required by current law. Additionally, the person may file a petition for removal from this state’s sexual offender registry and satisfy the requirements for removal based on adjudication in another state if certain requirements specified in the bill are satisfied. Currently, if a petition for removal is denied, no successive petition can be filed for at least five years from the judgment date of a petition. Under this bill, if the denial was based on a statute or law that has since been amended, repealed, or invalidated, a person can file a petition within the five-year period. The new petition must include the case number and court of the prior petition and identify the applicable change in the statute or law. This bill repeals the provisions relating to someone being removed from the sex offender registry for certain offenses that were nonsexual in nature as specified in the bill. The bill also modifies the list of offenses that exempts offenders who meet the other requirements provided in current law from registration. An offender will have the burden of proving that the requirements for exemption are met. The registration official must enter, rather than forward to MSHP, the completed offender registration forms and related updates into the online sex offender registry within three days. MSHP must ensure the information entered into the registry is accessible through the Missouri Uniform Law Enforcement System and forwarded to the National Crime Information Center. MSHP must also regularly update the web page to remove persons who have been removed or exempted, persons deceased, or persons who have moved out of state. Lastly, this bill modifies certain information related to sex offenders and the metadata of the sex offender registry that is considered as an open or closed record under Missouri Sunshine Law. Currently, if a person determined by a court to be a sexually violent predator is ordered to the Department of Mental Health (DMH), the Director of the Department determines the appropriate secure facility. This bill adds the Department of Corrections (DOC) as an option for an appropriate secure facility. The bill allows DMH to enter into an interagency agreement with DOC to confine persons determined to be sexually violent predators who have been ordered to DMH or for persons ordered to DMH after a finding of probable cause that the person is a sexually violent predator, as long as DOC has enough space and services available and the Director of DOC has agreed to provide the confinement through an interagency agreement with DMH. The interagency agreement will also be for the control and care, including health care services, of the persons committed to DMH as sexually violent predators. Persons who are under the control and care of DOC under an agreement wit DMH must be housed and managed separately from offenders in the custody of DOC and must be segregated from such offenders except for occasional instances of supervised incidental contact. If DMH and DOC have entered into an interagency agreement, DOC is authorized to enter into one or more contract agreements as may be necessary to perform the agreed-upon responsibilities of DOC under the interagency agreement, as provided in the bill. DOC is also authorized to enter into one or more contract agreements with one or more licensed professionals or providers of health care services to provide health care services for the sexually violent predators housed in DOC. DMH is authorized to enter into one or more contract agreements with one or more licensed professionals or providers of health care or mental health care services to provide health care or mental health care services to the persons ordered to DMH as sexually violent predators.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
05/06/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

SB987 Modifies provisions relating to erroneous property classifications
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SB 987 - Current law provides that a taxpayer shall be awarded costs and reasonable attorney's fees for any appeal of an assessor's classification of real property that is found by the State Tax Commission or a court of competent jurisdiction to be an erroneous classification. This act provides that any such decision shall include the recovery of such costs. The act provides that any taxpayer not receiving such costs and fees derived from any decision made on or after January 1, 2024, shall have a cause of action against the assessor to recover such costs and fees, as well as the costs and fees associated with initiating such cause of action. Such taxpayer shall also be entitled to recover damages in an amount equal to ten percent of the original assessed value of the property that was erroneously classified. This act is identical to SCS/SB 759 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/21/2026

SB989 Creates new provisions relating to employee compensation
Sponsor Sen. Tracy McCreery (D)
Summary
SB 989 - This act establishes new provisions relating to employee compensation that are identical to those implemented by Proposition A (2024) and repealed in 2025. Additionally, it creates new provisions providing for bereavement leave.MINIMUM WAGE (Section 290.502)The act reinstates an annual cost of living index for the minimum wage rate. EARNED PAID TIME (Sections 290.601 through 290.643)The act reinstates the provisions of law establishing a system of earned paid sick time.The act provides that all applicable employees accrue a minimum of one hour of earned paid sick time for every 30 hours worked. Employees of an employer with 15 or more employees can use up to 56 hours of time in any given year but employees of an employer with fewer than 15 employees can only use 40 hours of time in any given year. Accrual begins January 1, 2027, or upon the commencement of employment, whichever is later. Employees may used earned paid sick time following 90 days of continuous employment, unless an employer's written policy allows the use of such leave prior to such time.The act limits the reasons for which an employee may use earned paid sick time to the following reasons: • An employee's mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; an employee's need for medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; an employee's need for preventative medical care; • Care of a family member with a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; care of a family member who needs medical diagnosis, care, or treatment of a mental or physical illness, injury, or health condition; care of a family member who needs preventative medical care; • Closure of the employee's place of business by order of a public official due to a public health emergency, or an employee's need to care for a child whose school or place of care has been closed by order of a public official due to a public health emergency, or care for oneself or a family member when it has been determined by the health authorities having jurisdiction or by a health care provider that the employee's or family member's presence in the community may jeopardize the health of others because of his or her exposure to a communicable disease, whether or not the employee or family member has actually contracted the communicable disease; or • Absence necessary due to domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, provided the leave is to allow the employee to obtain for the employee or the employee's family member one of several listed services, described in the act.Earned paid sick time shall be provided upon the request of an employee. Such request may be made orally, in writing, by electronic means, or by any other means acceptable to the employer. When possible, the request shall include the expected duration of the absence. Employees shall provide notice of the need for using earned paid sick time when the use is foreseeable. The act additionally allows certain private employees to earn paid bereavement time in the same manner as earned paid sick time is accrued. Earned paid bereavement time can be used within 90 days of the death of a family member, as defined under current law, or in connection with an event resulting in reproductive loss. Earned paid bereavement time shall begin to accrue at the commencement of employment or January 1, 2027, whichever is later. All provisions applicable to the accrual and use of earned paid sick time are applicable to the accrual and use of earned paid bereavement time under this act. Employers may request, but not require, employees to search for or find a replacement worker to cover hours during which the employee is using earned paid sick time. Additionally, an employer may require reasonable documentation, as described in the act, for time used on three or more consecutive work days. Any employer who willfully violates or fails to comply with any of the provisions and requirements of this act shall be guilty of a class C misdemeanor. Each day of violation or failure to comply and each employee affected shall constitute a separate offense. Furthermore, any individual who claims to have been aggrieved by a failure of an employer to comply with any portion of this act, including but not limited to the failure to provide earned paid sick time or to allow employees to use such time, or who claims to have suffered a retaliatory personnel action prohibited by this act, shall have a right of action and may commence a civil action in the appropriate court of jurisdiction within three years of the accrual of the cause of action, to obtain appropriate relief with respect to such unlawful violation. Such action may be brought without first filing an administrative complaint. If the court finds a violation has occurred, the court may grant as relief, as it deems appropriate and to the extent permitted by law, any permanent or temporary injunction, the full amount of any unpaid earned sick time plus any actual damages suffered as the result of the employer's violation of this act, an additional amount equal to twice any unpaid earned sick time as liquidated damages, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees as may be allowed by the court, and other legal or equitable relief as may be appropriate to remedy the violation, including, without limitation, reinstatement to employment and back pay.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws

SB992 Repeals provisions relating to the statewide assessment system
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 992 - This act repeals provisions of law requiring the State Board of Education to develop a statewide assessment system. Instead, school districts shall use nationally norm-referenced assessments, rather than the Missouri Assessment Program, to test students' knowledge and skills. This act shall become effective only upon notification to the Revisor of Statutes by an opinion by the Attorney General of Missouri, a proclamation by the Governor of Missouri, or the adoption of a concurrent resolution by the Missouri General Assembly that the United States Department of Education has been abolished or dismantled by an act of the United States Congress. This act is similar to SB 542 (2025) and HB 1123 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/08/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB994 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Ways and Means by a vote of 8 to 0. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for SB 994. MILITARY INCOME TAX EXEMPTION (Section 143.121) Currently, for purposes of calculating the Missouri taxable income, 100% of the income received by any person as salary or compensation in any form as a member of the active duty component of the Armed Forces of the United States, and to the extent that such income is included in the Federal adjusted gross income, may be deducted from the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income to determine the taxpayer's Missouri taxable income. The taxpayer's retirement benefits are automatically subtracted from the taxpayer's Federal adjusted gross income. Beginning January 1, 2027, this bill specifies that all taxable pay, benefits, and allowances paid to or received by a member or former member of the uniformed services as salary, retirement benefits, or compensation in any form for military service in the uniformed services including, but not limited to, basic pay, drill pay, annual training pay, active duty pay, active duty training pay, special and incentive pay, bonuses, inactive duty training (IDT) pay, annual training pay, and any other form of military income is subtracted from a taxpayer's Federal adjusted gross income for the purpose of calculating the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income. BEGINNING FARMER INCOME TAX DEDUCTION (Section 143.121) Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for certain income received for the sale or lease of farmland to beginning farmers. This bill adds a definition of "taxpayer" to such deduction. TAX RETURNS (Sections 143.511, 143.591, and 143.971) Current law provides that the date for filing income tax returns must be the 15th day of the fourth month following the close of the taxpayer's taxable year. This bill provides that such date must be the date prescribed for the filing of federal tax returns (Section 143.511). Currently, an employer with at least 250 employees must electronically submit a tax return that indicates the amount of taxes withheld on wages in the previous tax year by January 31. Beginning January 1, 2027, the bill changes the number of employees to at least 10. This bill provides that tax return forms for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, must indicate the name of the public school district in which the taxpayer resides. TAX DEFICIENCIES (Sections 143.512 and 143.621) This bill provides that, if a taxpayer has an income tax balance due because of a full or partial denial of a tax credit, the taxpayer must not be held liable for any addition to tax, penalty, or interest on that amount of the balance due. The bill applies if the only reason for the denial is due to the tax credit reaching it's maximum amount for the relevant year, as specified in the bill. This bill provides that a taxpayer that has paid a deficiency and any interest, additions to tax, or penalties attributable to such deficiency that is subsequently found to be erroneous, regardless of whether the taxpayer has timely filed a protest with the Director of Revenue, must be entitled to a refund in the amount of the deficiency and any interest, additions to tax, or penalties attributable to such deficiency that were paid by the taxpayer. The refund must be paid as provided in current law. There is a delayed effective date for certain sections in the bill. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that this bill offers taxpayer protections. Those in support of the bill state that, currently, if a person who claimed a tax credit is denied that credit because the credit hit its cap, the person would have to pay penalties and interest on their outstanding taxes. Supporters say this bill addresses this issue and provides that, if a person who claimed a tax credit is denied solely because the credit hit its cap, the person would not have to pay such penalties and interest. Those in support of the bill state it allows farmers who have trusts and LLCs to benefit from the Beginning Farmer Income Tax Deduction program. Testifying in person for the bill were Senator Henderson; Missouri Bankers Association; Missouri Soybean Association; Missouri Farm Bureau; Missouri Corn Growers Association; Arnie C. Dienoff; and Feeding Missouri. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: 3rd Reading
Last Action
05/15/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Fiscal Review

SB998 Creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 998 - This act creates, repeals, and modifies provisions of the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program. The act changes the definition of "illegal alien" to "legal resident" as set forth under federal law. The act modifies the definition of "qualified student" by removing the requirement for a qualified student to have attended a public school during the previous 12 months, as well as removing requirements relating to students' kindergarten eligibility and siblings who participate in the program. Such definition is further modified by adding dyslexia and disability diagnoses to requirements concerning individualized education plans. The act provides that an organization representing a group of parents of qualified students may intervene on behalf of such parents as a defendant in any action in which any provision of state law, the Missouri Constitution, or a state regulation involving the program is at issue. An organization that intervenes as provided in the act shall have the right to file such pleading necessary on behalf of such parents. Finally, except as specifically provided in state law, the act prohibits the creation or enforcement of any rule, regulation, or other requirement that conditions a qualified school's participation in the program on accreditation or compliance with any other requirement. Any rule, regulation, or other requirement that violates this provision is void and shall have no force or effect.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB1001 Modifies provisions relating to real estate
Sponsor Sen. Adam Schnelting (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 1001 - This act creates various new provisions relating to homeownership.   AMERICAN DREAM TAX CREDIT AND SAVINGS ACCOUNTS (Section 143.1155 and 443.1010) This act establishes the American Dream Savings Account Act. Beginning January 1, 2027, any individual may open a savings account and designate the account as an American dream savings account to be used to pay or reimburse a qualified beneficiary's eligible expenses, as defined in the act.   This act also creates an income tax deduction for taxpayers who make contributions to such savings account. The deduction shall not exceed the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income for the tax year the deduction is claimed and shall not exceed $5,000 or $10,000 for married individuals filing jointly. Each taxpayer claiming the deduction shall file an affidavit with the income tax return verifying the amount of their contributions.   An account holder shall designate a beneficiary of the account no later than April 15 of the year following the tax year in which the account was opened.   The maximum amount an individual may contribute to an account in a single tax year is $5,000 for an individual or $10,000 for a couple filing a joint tax return. The maximum amount of all contributions to an account for all tax years is $30,000. An account shall not contain more than $30,000.   The title of any home purchased with moneys from an account may not transfer for at least two years, absent reasonable circumstances.   Moneys withdrawn from an account shall be subject to recapture and penalties if the moneys are used for any purpose other than those specified in the act.   No financial institution shall be required to designate an account as an American dream savings account in its contracts or systems, to track the use of moneys withdrawn from an account, or to report any information that it is not otherwise required to by law.   The income tax deduction created by this act shall sunset December 31, 2032, unless reauthorized by the General Assembly.   These provisions are substantially similar to the "First-Time Home Buyer's Tax Credit and Savings Account (HB 1796, 2018), which expired in August, 2024.   AMERICAN DREAM ACT (Section 442.703) The act creates the "American Dream Act." Institutional buyers, as that term is defined in the act, are prohibited from owning more than 100 single-family residential properties within Missouri. Institutional buyers are required to submit annual reports to the Secretary of State, with such information as stipulated in the act. Failure to file the required report may result in a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000 per violation.   The Attorney General is given authority to investigate and enforce compliance with this act. If, upon filing of a cause of action by the attorney general, a court finds that a single-family residential property was acquired in violation of this section, the court shall order the sale of the property within ninety days of the order. The court may additionally order such injunctive relief or any other remedy provided by law, as deemed appropriate. If an institutional buyer has been found by a court to be in violation of this act on 3 or more occasions, the court may fine the institutional buyer in an amount of $50,000 per occasion.   This provision does not apply to any entity engaged in the development or construction of residential properties or developments, or any affiliates thereof, provided the entity or affiliate is not otherwise a subsidiary or affiliate of an institutional buyer.   This act contains a severability clause. SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/05/2026
H - Removed from House Hearing Agenda - 5/5/26 - 9:00 am - HR 1 - House-Emerging Issues

SB1002 Creates and modifies provisions relating to elections submitted to the people by a school board of any school district located in St. Charles County
Sponsor Sen. Adam Schnelting (R)
Summary
SS SB 1002 -- ELECTIONS SUBMITTED TO THE PEOPLE BY A SCHOOL BOARD This bill requires all elections for school board members of any school district in which a majority of the district is located in St. Charles County to be held at the November general election and makes all such terms four years. At the time of filing a declaration of candidacy, a candidate can voluntarily designate his or her party affiliation and consent to have such affiliation appear beside the candidate's name on the ballot. The bill requires the board of a seven member district in St. Charles County, other than an urban district, to elect a president and vice president and on or before the 15th day in January in odd-numbered years, elect a secretary and a treasurer. The secretary and treasurer may or may not be members of the board. No compensation for either the secretary and treasurer will be granted until the report and settlement are made, filed , and published as the law directs. The bill further requires all proposals submitted to the voters of any school district in which a majority of the district is located in St. Charles County for the purpose of levying a new tax or renewing or increasing the levy of an existing tax, including for the issuance of bonded indebtedness, to be submitted at the November general election.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/13/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

SB1017 Authorizes a state sales tax exemption for food
Sponsor Sen. Patty Lewis (D)
Summary
SCS/SBs 1017 & 1239 - Current law taxes retail sales of food, as defined in current law, at a rate of one percent. This act provides that retail sales of food shall be exempt from state sales taxes. (Section 144.014) This provision is identical to SB 688 (2025), SB 734 (2025), and SCS/SB 161 (2023), and to a provision in SB 57 (2025) and SCS/HCS/HB 154 (2023), and is substantially similar to SB 659 (2025), HB 345 (2025), HB 432 (2025), HB 872 (2025), HB 1587 (2025), HB 1418 (2024), HB 1464 (2024), HB 2174 (2024), HB 260 (2023), HB 452 (2023), HB 591 (2023), HB 896 (2023), HCS#2/HB 1992 (2022), HB 1817 (2022), and HB 2530 (2022), and to a provision in HB 1029 (2025), HB 2815 (2024), HB 2887 (2024), HB 377 (2023), HCS/HBs 876, 771, 676 & 551 (2023), HB 1136 (2023), HB 1779 (2022), and HB 2249 (2022). The act also provides that, of the 4% state sales tax rate, the revenue derived from a rate of 0.2% shall be deposited in the School District Trust Fund. (Section 144.020)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/25/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1028 Establishes provisions regarding elementary and secondary education
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1028 - This act establishes provisions relating to education and creates the "Sunlight in Learning Act" requiring certain information to be to be posted on public school websites, as well as the "Parents' Bill of Rights Act of 2026" outlining the rights of parents of public school students. DIVISIVE CONCEPTS (Section 160.2550) Under this act, school districts are prohibited from teaching about The 1619 Project initiative of The New York Times or any successor theory or concept, critical race theory or any successor theory or concept, and any divisive concepts, as such term is defined in the act. School districts are also prohibited from certain actions listed in the act relating to curriculum and instruction. In adopting the essential knowledge and skills for the social studies for each grade level from kindergarten through 12th grade, each school district shall adopt knowledge and skills that develop each student's civic knowledge as set forth in the act. School districts shall not accept private funding for the purposes of teaching any curriculum substantially similar to critical race theory or The 1619 Project. The Attorney General may investigate school districts for compliance with the act. Any school district that violates the provisions of the act shall have 50% of the district's state aid withheld until the district presents evidence to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education that the district is no longer in violation of this section. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 115 (2025), is substantially similar to SB 694 (2022) and provisions in SB 770 (2024) and SB 42 (2023), and is similar to SB 172 (2023), SB 638 (2022), SB 676 (2022), SB 734 (2022), SB 1184 (2022), and a provision in SB 918 (2024).SUNLIGHT IN LEARNING (Section 161.856) This act establishes the "Sunlight in Learning Act", which requires certain training, instructional, and curricular materials to be posted on a public school's or charter school's website. The website shall include the title, author, organization, and any website associated with the material or activity. The website shall also include the identity of the teacher or other person who created the learning material. Any activity that involves service-learning, internships, or outside organizations shall be included on the website, as outlined in the act. All procedures for the documentation, review, or approval of materials used for staff or faculty training or student learning shall be included on the school website. A listing of available resources in the library shall be included on the website. The information required to be posted on the school website shall be displayed online prior to the first instance of training or instruction, or, at the latest, fourteen days after the training or instruction. The information shall be organized by school, grade, teacher, and subject, and be displayed on the website for at least two years. Schools may use a collaborative online document or spreadsheet software to update the listings on the website. The listing shall be created and displayed in searchable or sortable electronic formats. A school with fewer that twenty enrolled students and whose materials and activities are selected independently by instructors is not required to post a list of learning materials and activities on a website. The Attorney General, Commissioner of Education, State Auditor, prosecuting or circuit attorney, or resident of a school district may initiate a suit against the school district, public school, charter school, or other governmental entity responsible for educational oversight if a violation of this act occurs. Courts shall not entertain complaints unless complainants have first worked to remedy the situation by contacting school officials, who have fifteen days to resolve the situation, or by contacting the school board, who have forty-five days to resolve the situation. No school officials shall purchase or contract copyrighted learning materials, including renewal of subscription-based materials where students are provided login credentials or access via electronic personal devices, unless provisions are made to allow parents and guardians of students to review the materials within thirty days of the submission of a written request to the school. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 115 (2025), is substantially similar to SB 1225 (2022) and provisions in SB 770 (2024) and SB 42 (2023), and is similar to SB 645 (2022), SB 810 (2022), and HB 1995 (2022). PARENTS' BILL OF RIGHTS (Section 161.1140) This act creates the "Parents' Bill of Rights Act of 2026." Under this act, no school district shall deny to the parent or guardian of a minor child certain rights. Such rights include the ability to fully review the curricula, books, and other educational materials used by the school attended by their child; the ability to access information on teachers, guest lecturers, and outside presenters who engage with students at the school; the ability to access information on third-party individuals and organizations that receive contracts or other funding through the school; the right to visit their child at school during school hours; the right to access all records generated by the school that concern their child; the ability to access information pertaining to the collection and transmission of data regarding their child; the right to be heard at school board meetings; the right to be notified of situations affecting the safety of their child at school; and the right to object to certain materials that the parent finds inappropriate to be taught to their child. Any person denied one of these rights may bring a civil action for injunctive relief. The attorney general may also bring a civil action for injunctive relief. If a school district is found to have violated this act, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education may withhold up to fifty percent of the state aid for such district. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 115 (2025) and is similar to provisions in SB 770 (2024), SB 776 (2022), and HCS/SS#2/SCS/SBs 42, 42 & 89 (2023).PARTICIPATION IN ATHLETIC COMPETITION (Section 167.177) Upon adoption by a school district and approval of the residents of the school district, no public school shall knowingly allow a student of the male sex who is enrolled in such public school to participate in a school-sponsored athletic team that is exclusively for students of the female sex. Beginning July 1, 2027, the Joint Committee on Education shall study exclusively male or female athletic events and the impact of a policy that prohibits participation in those events by individuals of the opposite sex. By January 1, 2028, the Committee shall report its findings to the General Assembly. The Attorney General may investigate any school district alleged to be in violation of this provision. Any school district found to be in violation shall have fifty percent of its state aid withheld until the school district provides evidence to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education that it is in compliance with this provision. This provision is identical to provisions in SB 115 (2025), SB 770 (2024), and SB 42 (2023), is substantially similar to HB 2461 (2022) and a provision in HCS/HB 2140 (2022), and is similar to HB 2735 (2022). This act is substantially similar to SB 115 (2025) and similar to SB 770 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1029 Creates and modifies provisions relating to education
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SS#2/SCS/SB 1029 - This act creates and modifies provisions relating to education. FUNDING FOR EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION SERVICES(Sections 67.547 and 67.5420) This act provides that current law relating to the distribution of sales tax proceeds in St. Louis County shall not apply to a tax for the purpose of funding early childhood educational services, and requires that such proceeds shall be deposited in the county's Early Childhood Education Fund, which is created by the act. (Section 67.547) This act also requires the proceeds of any tax imposed by St. Louis County or St. Louis City for the purposes of improving the quality, affordability, and access to early childhood development programs for children aged five years and younger to be deposited into the county or city Early Childhood Education Fund. The administrative control and management of such funds shall be by the board of directors responsible for the administration of a city or county Community Children's Services Fund. The board of directors shall use or disburse the funds in the Early Childhood Education Fund to provide and administer programs subsidizing the cost of providing early childhood education, prioritizing children in financial need. Financial assistance may be used for early childhood education and child care provided by public, private, not-for-profit, and for-profit entities licensed, contracted to receive child care subsidies, or otherwise registered by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, including preschools, childcare centers, nursery schools, local education agencies, charter schools, Head Start and Early Head Start programs, informal childcare providers and independent and system-affiliated family child care homes, as described in the act. (Section 67.5420) These provisions are similar to HB 2379 (2026), HB 3149 (2026), SB 20 (2025), SB 1447 (2024), and HB 373 (2023).MISSOURI EMPOWERMENT SCHOLARSHIP ACCOUNTS PROGRAM(Sections 135.714, 135.715, and 135.716) Currently, educational assistance organizations (EAOs) that award student scholarships through the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program are required to spend at least 90% of all taxpayer contributions on scholarship accounts. Between three and ten percent of such contributions may be spent on marketing and administrative expenses, depending on the total amount of contributions received. Additionally, four percent of all contributions are to be deposited into a state fund to be used by the State Treasurer for marketing and administrative expenses or the costs incurred in administering the program, whichever is less. This act requires EAOs to ensure that at least 94% of all contributions and state appropriations are spent on scholarship accounts. Three percent of the EAO's remaining revenue from contributions and appropriations may be spent on the EAO's administrative expenses. Additionally, three percent, rather than four percent, of all contributions and appropriations to each EAO shall be deposited into the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Fund, to be used by the State Treasurer for administrative expenses or the costs incurred in administering the program, whichever is less. (Sections 135.714, 135.715, and 135.716). The act further provides that each EAO shall submit to an annual audit conducted by the State Auditor within six months of the end of the EAO's fiscal year, rather than submitting audits prepared by a certified public accountant to the State Treasurer annually. The State Treasurer shall provide all information included in the annual audits if requested by a public governmental body, without redactions. However, any personally identifiable information of any qualified student or parent that satisfies the definition of "personally identifiable information" under the federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act shall be a closed record under the Missouri Sunshine Law and shall not be disclosed to the public by any public governmental body. (Section 135.714)SCHOOL DISTRICT FINANCIAL INFORMATION(Section 162.192) Under this act, each school district shall maintain a searchable, publicly accessible database on its website setting forth all financial transactions conducted with school district funds. The financial ledger shall be available without login credentials, registration, or fees, and shall be downloadable and exportable in formats specified in the act. The financial ledger shall record transactions using codes set forth in the Missouri Financial Accounting Manual published by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), as applicable. Certain data fields shall be included in the financial ledger at minimum, such as transaction date, transaction amount, revenue or expenditure designation, fund code, function code, object code, vendor or payee name, and a description or memo field. The homepage of each public school's website shall include a direct link to the financial ledger of the school district that oversees such public school. The link shall make the financial ledger accessible within one click, and shall be functional and mobile-responsive. DESE may provide standardized language or icons that public schools may use for this purpose. A school district's financial ledger shall be updated at least monthly. Details of each calendar month's financial transactions shall be posted no later than 45 days after the close of that calendar month. For record keeping purposes, a school district shall maintain at least five fiscal years of historical data on its financial ledger. Protected personal information may be redacted only to the extent required by applicable law. Vendor names, amounts, and accounting codes shall not be redacted. Payroll data may be presented in aggregated form where disclosure of individual information is restricted. Debt obligations shall be posted in a separate section of the financial ledger, with disclosure of outstanding debt balances, issuance dates, repayment schedules, annual debt service amounts, and debt service as a percentage of total expenditures. DESE may provide or approve standardized templates or platforms school districts may use for their financial ledgers. DESE may additionally provide guidance to assist school districts with compliance. DESE shall promulgate rules establishing procedures and timelines for school districts to certify compliance annually. A school district that violates any provision of this act may be subject to the withholding of state aid from such school district. DESE shall establish a process for members of the public to file complaints if they believe a school district has violated any provision of the act. DESE may also establish a public compliance dashboard on DESE's website to enable members of the public to check whether a particular school district is certified as in compliance.SCHOOL DISTRICT LEGAL EXPENSES(Section 162.821) The act requires school districts to include the amount expended for legal services in their Annual Secretary of the Board Report. If the report does not include the amount expended for legal services, then the Attorney General may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief, against the school district. Such action shall be brought in the county where the school district is located. This provision is identical to SB 1353 (2026) and substantially similar to SB 793 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB1031 Prohibits expenditures by state departments for certain diversity initiatives
Sponsor Sen. Mike Moon (R)
Summary
SB 1031 - This act prohibits any state department to expend funds for intradepartmental programs, staffing, or other initiatives associated with "diversity, equity, and inclusion" or "diversity, inclusion, and belonging" or any other similar initiative, as described in the act. This act does not prohibit state departments from following anti-discrimination laws or complying with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. This act is substantially similar to SCS/HB 742 (2025).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/02/2026
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB1040 Authorizes a sales tax for special educational services
Sponsor Sen. Steven Roberts (D)
Summary
SB 1040 - This act authorizes the board of education of a metropolitan school district to impose a sales tax for the purpose of funding special educational services in the district. The tax shall not exceed 0.25%. This act is identical to SB 203 (2025), SB 965 (2024), and HB 2443 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1041 Authorizes a property tax for special educational services
Sponsor Sen. Steven Roberts (D)
Summary
SB 1041 - This act authorizes the board of education of a metropolitan school district to impose a tax on real property located in the district for the purpose of funding special educational services in the district. The tax shall not exceed three cents per one hundred dollars assessed valuation. This act is identical to SB 203 (2025), SB 966 (2024), and HB 2442 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1046 Modifies provisions relating to special administrative boards for unaccredited school districts
Sponsor Sen. Angela Mosley (D)
Summary
SB 1046 - Under this act, upon classification of a school district as unaccredited, the State Board of Education may suspend the governing or managing authority of the elected school board members of the unaccredited school district and take actions relating to special administrative boards as set forth in the act. Current law provides that a special administrative board for a school district shall have no fewer than five members. Under this act, such board shall have seven members, four of whom shall be residents of the school district. Each member of the board shall serve for three years, and the qualifications of the members are listed in the act. The special administrative board shall meet at least once per month, and each member shall receive a salary of $500 a month. Within 15 days after the vote to appoint a member to the special administrative board, if a member of the Missouri House of Representatives whose district includes the school district, in whole or in part, submits a request to the President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the appointment shall be subject to the advice and consent of the Senate. The members of the school district's elected school board shall be ex-officio, non-voting members of the special administrative board. Upon failure of the school district to be classified as provisionally or fully accredited for at least two successive academic years, the State Board of Education shall require the special administrative board to establish a specific plan and timeline for achieving accreditation and shall require the special administrative board to satisfy certain other requirements, including the appointment of a new superintendent of the school district for a term of not more than three years. The authority of the special administrative board shall expire at the end of the third full school year following its appointment, unless extended for not more than three school years by the State Board of Education. Governance of the school district shall be returned to the elected school board upon the expiration of the authority of the special administrative board. The act repeals a provision of law authorizing the State Board of Education to appoint additional members to any special administrative board and to set final terms of office for members of such board. Not later than six full school years after the appointment of the special administrative board, on a date set by the State Board of Education, any district operating under the governance of a special administrative board shall return to local governance. This act is identical to SB 306 (2025), is substantially similar to SB 1104 (2024), SB 272 (2023), SB 951 (2022), and HB 1774 (2022), and is similar to HB 387 (2025), HB 1646 (2024), and HB 63 (2023).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1051 Creates provisions relating to protections against discrimination in educational settings
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SB 1051 - This act requires all public schools, school districts, and public institutions of postsecondary education to treat discrimination motivated by antisemitism, as such term is defined in the act, in an identical manner to racially motivated discrimination. Schools and institutions shall include antisemitism-related conduct and penalties in their codes of conduct for students, faculty, and employees, as provided in the act, and shall prohibit behaviors that disrupt normal educational activity or create fear or intimidation. Criticism of Israel comparable to that of other countries shall not be considered antisemitism. The act shall not be construed to infringe on First Amendment rights or conflict with existing discrimination laws. The act further provides that no public school or public institution of postsecondary education shall discriminate because of race, ethnicity, national origin, sex, disability, religion, or marital status in any program, admission, class, or service, including counseling and financial aid. While specialized programs, such as programs for gifted or disabled students, are allowed, equal access shall otherwise be maintained. To ensure compliance, each educational institution shall report incidents and complaints of antisemitism to the appropriate Title VI coordinator at either the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) or the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development (DHEWD). If an educational institution fails to resolve issues within 30 days after being notified, the coordinator may escalate the matter to federal authorities. An annual report of these activities shall be submitted to the General Assembly by July 1 each year. This act is similar to HB 746 (2025) and provisions in HCS/SS/SB 38 (2025) and HCS/HB 937 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Education

SB1064 Modifies provisions relating to tobacco product regulations
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SB 1064 - Under this act, the state's laws shall preempt any local laws, ordinances, orders, rules, or regulations enacted by a county, municipality, or other political subdivision of the state regulating the sale of tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products. Additionally, nothing in this act shall be construed to prohibit counties, municipalities, and other political subdivisions from enforcing ordinances and regulations that prevent the sale of tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products to persons under the age of 21. Finally, the provisions of this act shall not be construed to preempt any local laws, ordinances, orders, rules, or regulations relating to tobacco products, alternative nicotine products, or vapor products enacted by a county, municipality, or other political subdivision in effect as of January 1, 2026. This act is substantially similar to SCS/SB 231 (2025) and similar to HCS/HB 344 (2025), SB 911 (2024), SB 522 (2023), HCS/HB 1039 (2023), and SB 1158 (2022).SARAH HASKINS
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/24/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB1066 Modifies provisions relating to property taxation
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Property Tax Reform by a vote of 11 to 5. Voted "Do Pass" by the Standing Committee on Rules-Legislative by a vote of 9 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for SB 1066. The bill prohibits any political subdivision or election authority from advertising or describing any proposed property tax as a "no tax increase" tax proposal (Section 67.496, RSMo). This bill requires political subdivisions or special districts to label property tax-related ballot measures numerically or alphabetically. Ballot measures must not be labeled in a descriptive manner (Section 115.240). Beginning January 1, 2027, the bill requires that ballot language for a vote to levy a real property tax or personal property tax include elements as specified in the bill. This bill requires ballot language to describe the desired tax as a specified amount per $100,000 or per $10,000 of appraised value, depending on whether the property is residential, commercial, agricultural, or a motor vehicle. The bill prohibits any political subdivision or election authority from advertising or describing any proposed property tax as a "no tax increase" tax proposal, unless failing to adopt the proposed measure will actually increase the tax and adopting the proposed measure will cause the tax rate to stay the same or decrease. The bill requires ballot language statements to be fair, true, and accurate (Section 115.706). This bill modifies the definition of "residential property" for the purposes of the taxation of real property by providing that such definition must include single family homes that are owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company and leased, in whole or in part, for a term of less than 30 consecutive days, provided that this provision may not apply to any such property in excess of 15 such properties owned by the same individual or business or by any business entity in which the individual or business holds any ownership, membership, or beneficial interest (Section 137.016). This bill provides that each political subdivision that adopts or has adopted any tax abatement or similar economic incentive must decrease the levy of real property tax rates to reduce the amount of tax revenues the political subdivision received from the additional tax abatement revenue (Section 137.039). Currently, any political subdivision that received approval for a tax rate increase may levy a property tax rate to collect substantially the same amount of tax revenue as the amount of revenue that would have been derived by applying the voter- approved increased tax rate ceiling to the total assessed valuation of the political subdivision. However, the tax rate must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or the most recent adjusted voter-approved rate. The bill removes the single tax rate in the exception and provides that the rates of levy for each subclass of real property, individually, and personal property, in the aggregate, must not exceed the greater of the most recent voter-approved rate or most recent adjusted voter approved rate. Currently, if the tax revenue from various tax rates is different than the tax revenue that would have been determined from a single tax rate, then the political subdivision must revise the tax rates of those subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate that had a tax rate reduction. This revision must yield an amount equal to the difference and must be apportioned among the subclasses of real property, individually, and/or personal property, in the aggregate, based on the relative assessed valuation of the class or subclasses that experienced the tax rate reduction. Additionally, for school districts that levy separate tax rates on each subclass of real property and personal property, in the aggregate, or that had voter-approved ballots that set or increased the subclass rates differently prior to 2011, a blended tax rate must be used to calculate the single tax rate. This bill repeals this language. Political subdivisions are no longer required to compare revenues generated by multiple levies to a single-rate baseline or to adjust multiple levies based on a single-rate baseline. The bill requires that, if voters in a political subdivision approve a levy increase prior to the expiration of a previously- approved temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling will remain in effect only until the temporary levy increase expires under the terms originally approved by voters. At that time, the tax rate ceiling will be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase unless voters of the political subdivision are asked to approve an additional permanent increase and such increase is approved. This bill requires that, when voters in a political subdivision pass a tax rate increase, the political subdivision must use the current tax rate ceiling and the increase approved by the voters in establishing the rates of levy for the tax year immediately following the election. If the assessed valuation of real property in a political subdivision sees a reduction in value in the tax year immediately following the election, the political subdivision can raise its tax rates so that the revenue received from the local real property tax rates equals the amount the political subdivision would have received from the increased rates of levy had there been no reduction in the assessed valuation of real property in the political subdivision. In the event of an increased tax rate ceiling, the rate must be revenue neutral as required in Article X, Section 22 of the Constitution of Missouri (Section 137.073). As it relates to setting property tax rates, the bill repeals the single property tax rate and replaces the language with that relating to multiple tax rates (Section 137.079). This bill provides that when a valuation of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, and other real properties is made by a computer, computer-assisted method, or a computer program, the burden of proof to sustain the valuation must be on the assessor at any hearing or appeal. The bill provides that, before any assessor may increase the assessed valuation of any parcel of utility, industrial, commercial, railroad, or other real property by more than 15% since the last assessment, the assessor must conduct a physical inspection of the property. Currently, any county and city not within a county can opt out of implementing the provisions of certain sections of House bill 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate bill 960, which includes setting separate levies to be calculated for each subclass of real property and for personal property using the assessed valuation for each class of real property and of personal property. Any county and city not within a county may also opt out of implementing certain provisions of House Bill 1150 (2002) and certain provisions of Senate Bill 960 as they relate to tax rate ceilings, blended tax rates, tax rate calculations, and credit card usage to pay property taxes. This bill repeals the references to the provisions of House Bill 1150 (2002) and Senate Bill 960 (2004), as well as the corresponding procedures to opt out of or to implement these provisions. The bill requires that, beginning January 1, 2027, each county and city not within a county must determine the assessed valuation, set and revise rates of levy, and make adjustments to current levies for each subclass of real property, individually, and for personal property, in the aggregate (Section 137.115). Under the provisions of this bill, once an eligible taxpayer qualifies for the Homestead Property Tax Credit for seniors citizens, such taxpayer must maintain his or her eligibility without needing to reapply each year. The tax credit must continue to be automatically applied to the eligible taxpayer?s homestead until the tax year in which such taxpayer relocates or dies, which must be certified within 90 days of the date of either event. If a credit is granted in error due to the taxpayer failing to notify the collector of relocation or death, the county can remedy the error. This bill requires the tax statement to include a note informing the taxpayer that it is his or her responsibility to notify the county if he or she is no longer eligible for the tax credit. The bill clarifies that real property tax imposed by a county or by a political subdivision within the county includes, but is not limited to: tax levies for debt service, tax levies for operating purposes, and tax levies for capital improvements and projects. This bill requires the Department of Heath and Senior Services (DHSS) to establish a secure electronic portal that is accessible to each county if an appropriation is provided. This portal must allow county designees to access certain information to determine the death status of recipients of the senior property tax credit. If no appropriation is provided to establish this portal, DHSS must provide to each county a list of all individuals whose deaths were recorded within the county between July 1st of the preceding year to June 30th of the current year. This list must be provided by July 30th of each year. The bill requires each county designee to implement procedures to determine whether a change of ownership has occurred for any homestead receiving the senior property tax credit before issuing the property tax statement each year. This bill requires any payment of real or personal property taxes made through the United States Postal Service (USPS) to be postmarked by January 5th, and payments made through other means must be received by December 31st. The bill allows township collectors to accept partial or installment payments of real and personal property taxes prior to delinquency. This bill allows counties to extend the deadline for real or personal property tax payments by no more than 30 days if a county experiences certain difficulties that delay the preparation of mailing of real or personal property tax statements. The bill allows assessors or certain other county designees a grace period of no more than 10 days following the deadline for certain forms that are sent through USPS and postmarked prior to the due date (Section 137.1050). Currently, the eligible credit amount in "five percent counties" may be increased by no more than 5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is higher. The bill changes the language to provide that the eligible credit amount in "five percent counties" may be increased by no more than 5% per year or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is lower (Section 137.1055). Currently, no school district can receive more state aid for its education program than it received per weighted average daily attendance for the school year 2005-06 from the foundation formula, unless it has an operating levy for school purposes of not less than $2.75. This bill sets an end date for this operating levy floor. The bill provides that, for school districts that imposed a levy of $2.75 in 2026, their maximum levy must be $2.75 in 2027. After 2027, these school districts must set their levy as provided by the Missouri Constitution (Section 163.021). This bill contains a severability clause. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the introduced version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that in some counties, single family homes that are used as rentals are being classified as commercial property, and this bill addresses the classification of these properties. Those in support of the bill state that if these single family homes were to sell, they would sell at a residential rate because they are used for residential purposes. Hotels are different because they generate income from other activities beyond sleeping, such as through spas, restaurants, and bars in the hotels. Supporters say that there is currently ambiguity in the law regarding the classification of these single family homes that are used as rentals, and this bill provides clarity and fairness for homeowners. Those in support of the bill state that some people rent out their homes for short term leases to pay utilities and taxes. If these homes were reclassified as commercial properties, some homeowners would not be able to keep that home. Testifying in person for the bill were Senator Brown; Missouri Vacation Home Association; Jim Brown; and Missouri Association of Realtors. OPPONENTS: Those who oppose the bill say that those who purchase a home for the sole purpose of renting it out collect sales taxes just like other businesses, so they should be classified as a business. The 15-home cap in the bill does not keep people from creating a limited liability company for each home to avoid ever hitting that cap. Testifying in person against the bill was Missouri Hotel & Lodging Association. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: 3rd Reading
Last Action
05/13/2026
S - Conferees to Exceed the Differences

SB1067 Establishes the Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, which provides procedures for dismissal of actions based on public expression
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 1067 -- CIVIL ACTIONS BASED ON PUBLIC EXPRESSION This bill establishes the "Uniform Public Expression Protection Act". The bill relates to causes of action filed against individuals who exercise certain constitutional rights. The bill specifies that, when a person, defined in the bill as "an individual, estate, trust, partnership, business or nonprofit entity, governmental unit, or other legal entity", has a cause of action filed against the person based upon the person's communication in a governmental proceeding or on an issue under consideration in a governmental proceeding, or when the person exercises the person's right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble, or the right of association, that person may file a special motion to dismiss the cause of action. This bill establishes procedures for such special motions to dismiss. The bill specifies under which circumstances a court may award costs, reasonable attorneys' fees, and reasonable litigation expenses. The provisions of the bill apply to civil actions filed on or after August 28, 2026.
Progress
Passed Into Law
Last Action
07/13/2026
G - Signed by the Governor

SB1071 Modifies provisions relating to the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program
Sponsor Sen. David Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1071 - This act modifies provisions of the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program. The act modifies the definition of "qualified student" under the Program to include any resident of this state who is not an illegal alien and who is eligible to enroll in a public school or to receive early childhood special education services. The act repeals requirements relating to students' individualized education plans or household income. The act specifies that scholarship funds may be used to purchase technological devices such as calculators and personal computers, but not devices used primarily for noneducational purposes, such as televisions and telephones. Additionally, scholarship funds may be used to purchase a commuter pass for a qualified student, rather than covering only mileage costs to and from a qualified school. Provisions relating to agreements with educational assistance organizations shall not be construed to require a qualified student (a) to withdraw from a public school before applying for a scholarship account if the student withdraws from the school before receiving any moneys in his or her scholarship account, or (b) to prevent a qualified student from applying for a scholarship account to be funded beginning in the following school year. Finally, the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program shall not be construed to expand the regulatory authority of the state, its officers, or any school district, with respect to the imposition of any additional requirements or restrictions on qualified schools, beyond those necessary to enforce the requirements of the Program. This act is identical to SB 675 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1076 Prohibits the seizure of certain property for delinquent taxes
Sponsor Sen. Adam Schnelting (R)
Summary
SB 1076 - This act prohibits the seizure of personal property and certain real property that is used as the owner's primary residence solely because the owner of such property owes taxes on such property. This act is identical to SB 17 (2025 First Extraordinary Session) and HB 1212 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1079 Modifies provisions relating to the Show MO tax credit
Sponsor Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1079 - Current law authorizes a tax credit for certain motion media production projects, with $8 million per year allowed for film production, and $8 million per year allowed for series production. This act provides that, for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, a total of $16 million per year may be authorized with no specific limits for either film or series production. Additionally, the tax credit is scheduled to sunset on December 31, 2029. This act extends such date to December 31, 2035.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026

SB1085 Prohibits public school staff members from encouraging students in their social transition to being perceived as a gender different from their biological sex
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 1085 - This act prohibits public school and charter school staff members from encouraging minor students in their "social transition", defined as the process of a minor student changing his or her gender presentation or expression, with the goal of being perceived and treated as a gender different from the student's biological sex. The act defines a "staff member" as a teacher, school employee, volunteer, contractor, or other individual authorized to provide services at a public school or charter school, including, but not limited to, any individual in a position of authority or responsibility, such as a counselor or health care worker.   School staff members shall neither encourage a minor student to withhold information from his or her parent nor withhold certain health information from a student's parent. A staff member shall notify a minor student's parent within 24 hours of receiving a request by the student to participate in the student's social transition. The act outlines certain actions that trigger this parental notification requirement, including a minor student's request to be referred to by a pronoun that does not correspond to the student's biological sex; a request to use a name that does not correspond to the student's legal name; a request to use a restroom designated for the opposite biological sex; or a request to participate on an athletic team designated for the opposite biological sex.   No staff member shall engage in any conduct that facilitates the social transition of any minor student; deliver any presentation or lesson to any minor student regarding gender transition or social transition; or refer to a minor student by a title or pronoun that does not correspond to the student's biological sex, or by a name other than the student's legal name or a nickname or derivative thereof.   A staff member or student shall not be subject to any disciplinary action for declining to address a person using a name that does not correspond to the person's legal name or a pronoun that is inconsistent with the person's biological sex.   A staff member who discloses a violation of this act by another staff member shall be protected from any manner of retaliation as set forth in current law. If a school district discovers that a licensed educator has knowingly violated any provision of this act, the school district shall initiate disciplinary proceedings against that staff member, up to and including suspension or revocation of the individual's teaching license and suspension or termination of employment, as appropriate. A licensed educator at a charter school shall also be subject to disciplinary proceedings for violations of the act, up to and including suspension or revocation of the individual's teaching license and suspension or termination of employment, as provided in the act.   The Attorney General may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief, against a school district, public school, charter school, or staff member for any violation of this act. Any parent of a minor student may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief or for damages, against the staff member or against the school district, public school, or charter school in which such minor student is enrolled for any violation of this act. If the parent prevails, the court shall award to such parent court costs and reasonable attorney's fees and any other damages or remedy which in the judgment of the court shall be appropriate.   Any staff member may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief or for damages, against the school district, public school, or charter school that employs such staff member for any violation of the act's prohibitions on certain disciplinary or retaliatory actions against school staff members.   This act is similar to HB 2580 (2026). OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/13/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB1088 Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain residential real property
Sponsor Sen. Maggie Nurrenbern (D)
Summary
SB 1088 - This act modifies the definition of "residential property" for the purposes of the taxation of real property by providing that such definition shall include single family homes that are owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company and leased, in whole or in part, for a term of less than thirty consecutive days. This act is identical to SCS/HB 1086 (2025) and is substantially similar to SB 699 (2025) and SB 784 (2025), and to a provision in HB 660 (2025). JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/18/2026
S - Superseded by SB 1066

SB1090 Requires charter schools to obtain a certificate of need issued by the State Board of Education in order to be eligible to operate
Sponsor Sen. Maggie Nurrenbern (D)
Summary
SB 1090 - Under this act, no charter school established on or after August 28, 2026, shall be eligible to operate in Missouri without the State Board of Education's issuance of a certificate of need for such charter school as provided in the act. A certificate of need shall be required only for proposed charter schools that are not established as of August 28, 2026, and shall not be required for charter renewals or transfers of sponsorship. The act shall not be construed to exempt charter schools from state laws governing charter contracts or any other applicable state or federal law or regulation. The certificate of need application shall be a written certification, including supporting documentation, submitted by the governing board of the school district or the governing body of the city or county in which the proposed charter school would be operated, affirming that certain conditions apply to the school district in which the charter school would be operated. The certificate of need application shall affirm that consumer demand for alternative educational options exceeds supply, and that the school district has sufficient economies of scale, as such term is defined in the act, to enable the charter school to succeed without detrimentally impacting the school district's ability to provide a free public education. The certificate of need application shall also affirm that the charter school is likely to alleviate economic and racial inequities; improve students' academic achievement; reduce student-teacher ratios; improve efficiencies in education service delivery; reduce the number of schooling disruptions faced by children and families; and address other family priorities specified in the act. The State Board of Education shall review each charter school certificate of need application and either approve or disapprove each application within 120 calendar days of receipt. If the Board determines that the information provided in the application is factual and based on sound data and reasoning, the Board shall approve the application. If the Board determines that the information provided in the application is not factual and based on sound data and reasoning, the Board shall disapprove the application and provide to the applicant written documentation of the reasons why the application was not approved. This act is substantially similar to SB 177 (2025) and HB 1056 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1097 Prohibits the establishment of new charter schools in St. Louis City beginning August 28, 2026
Sponsor Sen. Karla May (D)
Summary
SB 1097 - Beginning August 28, 2026, this act prohibits the establishment of new charter schools in St. Louis City. The provisions of the act shall not apply to the renewal of charter contracts or transfers of sponsorship for any charter school established in St. Louis City prior to August 28, 2026. This act is identical to SB 693 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1105 Establishes the Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act
Sponsor Sen. Jason Bean (R)
Summary
SB 1105 - This act establishes the "Rural Workforce Housing Investment Act", which is a grant program established in the Department of Economic Development for the purpose of supporting the development of workforce housing in rural communities. A nonprofit development organization, as defined in the act, may apply to the Department for approval for a workforce housing grant to establish a workforce housing investment fund. Grants shall be awarded on a competitive basis, and no more than one million dollars shall be awarded to any one nonprofit development organization over a two year period, and no more than two million dollars to any one nonprofit development organization for the period ending on June 30, 2029. Grants shall require matching funds in order to be awarded, as described in the act. If a nonprofit development organization fails to engage in qualified activity within two years of receiving initial grant funding, such organization shall return the grant funds to the Department. If a nonprofit development organization fails to allocate any remaining grant funds to qualified activities within two years of the commencement of initial qualified activity, such organization shall return all unallocated grant funds. Beginning August 28, 2031, the Department shall transfer any remaining grant funds held by the Department to the Missouri Housing Trust Fund. Annual reports shall be filed by all nonprofit development organizations and by the Department, as described in the act. This act is identical to SB 656 (2025) and HB 245 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
01/28/2026

SB1110 Modifies the composition of the State Tax Commission
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 1110 - Current law provides that the State Tax Commission shall be composed of three members, with no more than two members from the same political party. This act increases the number of commissioners to five, with no more than three members from the same political party.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1118 Modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments
Sponsor Sen. Travis Fitzwater (R)
Summary
SB 1118 - This act modifies provisions relating to personal property assessments.PERSONAL PROPERTY NEW CONSTRUCTION For the purposes of calculating the amount of assessed valuation of personal property, current law provides that the definition of new construction and improvements is the aggregate increase in valuation of personal property for the current year over that of the previous year. This act provides that, beginning January 1, 2028, new construction and improvements shall not include increases in the aggregate assessed valuation of personal property. (Section 137.073) This provision is substantially similar to SB 409 (2023) and HB 754 (2023).PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT RATE Current law requires personal property to be assessed at 33.3% of its true value in money. This act reduces such assessment rate to 30%. (Section 137.115.1) This act is substantially similar to SB 264 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026

SB1122 Modifies provisions relating to elections
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1122 - This act modifies various provisions relating to elections.PUBLIC HOLIDAY (Section 9.001)The act makes the general election a public holiday.INTERNET CONNECTIVITY - ELECTION EQUIPMENT (Section 115.013)The act modifies the definitions applicable to election equipment to provide that equipment is not capable of connecting to the internet through Bluetooth or any other wireless technology.VOTER REGISTRATION - DOCUMENTARY PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP (Various Sections)This act requires documentary proof of United States citizenship, as that term is defined in the act, in order to register to vote, provided that persons already registered to vote and those seeking to transfer voter registration within the state are not required to provide such proof. Additionally, all information required to be provided on a voter registration form shall be personally provided by the person seeking to register. These provisions are identical to certain provisions in SCS/SB 62 (2025).LIVESTREAM OF BALLOT COUNTING (Sections 115.449 and 115.477)The counting of ballots is required to be recorded and streamed on the website of the respective election authority.AUTOMATIC RECOUNTS (Section 115.601)The act requires an automatic recount in any election decided by fewer than 500 votes.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026

SB1123 Modifies provisions relating to providing explicit sexual material to a student
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1123 - This act provides that any library district or school district that employs a person who has been found guilty of the offense of providing explicit sexual material to a student shall no longer be eligible to receive any state funds. Additionally, the act modifies the offense of providing explicit sexual material to a student by including situations where a person approves of the provision of such material, as well as by adding library board members to the definition of persons who are "affiliated with a public or private elementary or secondary school in an official capacity". This act is identical to SB 483 (2025) and SB 1272 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1125 Establishes the Real Property Fraud Prevention Act
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1125 - This act requires a county recorder of deeds to provide notice to a property owner of record of a parcel of real property that a general warranty deed or quitclaim deed that affects the ownership of such parcel has been submitted for recording. The recorder shall delay the recording of any such deed for at least five working days in order to provide time to notify property owners. If each property owner of record provides written confirmation that the deed is legitimate, the recorder may proceed with the recording. If each property owner of record notifies the recorder that the deed is fraudulent, the recorder shall delay the recording for a further two days to allow the owner of record to seek an order from a court of competent jurisdiction to prohibit the recording of the deed. This act is identical to HB 323 (2025).TRISTAN BENSON, JR.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1127 Modifies provisions relating to funds in the state treasury
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 1127 - This act requires the State Treasurer to submit an annual report to the General Assembly detailing each fund established in the state treasury from which a disbursement has not been made during the five year period ending on June thirtieth of such year, and whether or not any remaining moneys in such funds have been transferred to the General Revenue fund pursuant to current law. (Section 33.082) This act also requires any remaining moneys in the following funds to be swept into the General Revenue Fund: 1) the Workers Memorial Fund (Section 8.900), 2) the State Document Preservation Fund (Section 109.005), 3) the MO HealthNet Fraud Prosecution Revolving Fund (Section 191.905), 4) the Coordinating Board for Early Childhood Fund (Section 210.102), 5) the Arrow Rock State Historic Site Endowment Fund (Section 253.092), 6) the Confederate Memorial Park Endowment Fund (Section 253.120), 7) the Missouri Dairy Industry Revitalization Fund (Section 261.275), 8) the Apple Merchandising Fund (Section 265.180), 9) the Agricultural Product Utilization and Business Development Loan Guarantee Fund (Section 348.409), and 10) the Manufactured Housing Consumer Recovery Fund (Section 700.041). This act is substantially similar to SB 722 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/09/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB1131 Modifies provisions relating to the State Tax Commission
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SB 1131 - This act modifies provisions relating to the duties of the State Tax Commission.ASSESSMENT MAINTENANCE PLAN Current law requires assessors to prepare and submit a two-year assessment maintenance plan to the State Tax Commission, with the receipt of state reimbursements contingent on adherence to such plan. This act removes the adherence to the maintenance plan as a condition for receiving state reimbursement for the costs and expenses incurred in assessing property. (Sections 137.115 and 137.750)POWERS OF THE STATE TAX COMMISSION Current law authorizes the State Tax Commission to raise or lower the assessed valuation of real or tangible personal property. This act provides that such power shall only extend to the raising or lowering of a parcel or item of real or personal property, and that the Commission shall not have the power to require an assessor to raise or lower the assessed valuation of an entire class or subclass of real or personal property. (Sections 138.380.1(1) and 138.410) This act also provides that the Commission shall not utilize the standards promulgated by the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) or any other international or domestic organization to carry out the powers and duties provided by law. (Section 138.380.2)STATE TAX COMMISSION RATIO STUDIES Current law requires the State Tax Commission to equalize the valuation of each class and subclass of property among the respective counties. This act requires the Commission to utilize ratio studies to determine whether a class or subclass is valued below or above its true value. Such values shall be no less than 70% and no more than 100% of true market value, as described in the act. (Section 138.390)OFFICE OF STATE OMBUDSMAN FOR PROPERTY ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION Current law establishes the Office of State Ombudsman for Property Assessment and Taxation within the State Tax Commission. This act provides that if in any given fiscal year the annual appropriation made to the Commission by the General Assembly is insufficient to fund the Office of the State Ombudsman for Property Assessment and Taxation, the Commission shall determine the amount of the insufficiency and an equal portion of the state reimbursement made to each county assessment fund shall instead be deposited in the State Ombudsman for Property Tax Fund, which is created by the act, such that the amount deposited is equal to the amount of the insufficiency. (Section 138.435)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1136 Establishes provisions relating to the reconsideration of materials in a public library or public school library
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 1136 - This act establishes provisions relating to the reconsideration of materials in a public library or public school library. The act defines "digital library material" as material including, but not limited to, digital audiobooks, electronic journals, electronic magazines, and other resources that are directly accessible through the public library or school library database, but excluding any online content that is available outside of the public library or school library database or platform. The act defines "library material" as any resource in print or non-print format, including, but not limited to, books, magazines, microfiche, microfilm, slides, exhibits, and other materials that are found in a public library or school library. The act defines "reconsideration" as a process in which library personnel, public schools, school districts, or library governing bodies review materials in a public library or school library due to a formal complaint filed by a member of the community. The outcome of this reconsideration may include relocating or removing library materials or removing or restricting access to digital library materials. All public libraries and public school libraries shall establish a policy outlining the process for reconsidering library materials and digital library materials based on a complaint from a member of the community. Such a policy shall be made publicly available as provided in the act. A public library or school library shall respond to a reconsideration request by removing library materials from its permanent collection, relocating library materials within its collection, or removing or restricting access to digital library materials within its collection only if such materials have been reviewed in accordance with an established policy for the reconsideration of library materials and digital library materials that complies the requirements of the act. To request reconsideration of library materials or digital library materials, the individual making the request shall sign an affidavit affirming that (a) the individual has read or consumed the entirety of the challenged material, and (b) the individual resides in the taxing district of the public library in which the request is made or the school district in which the request is made. Each public library or school library shall develop an appeals process for the reconsideration policy that outlines a process for appealing a decision made regarding the removal of library materials or digital library materials, as provided in the act. Digital library materials that undergo reconsideration shall be subject to removal or restricted access at the title, issue, and article level. Any third party contracted to provide databases that contain or provide access to digital library materials shall have the ability to curate those materials using a mechanism that allows for the removal or restriction of access to challenged content without disrupting access to the remainder of digital library materials accessible in the public library or school library. Curation of digital library materials shall not be applied at an individual user level, but rather at the library system or school district level. Digital library resources shall not track or monitor the access of library materials or digital library materials by individual users, especially minors, including any tracking or monitoring to personalize user experiences. An employee or volunteer of a public library or school library shall not be subject to termination, demotion, discipline, retaliation, or any other penalty for refusing to remove library materials or digital library materials before such materials have been reviewed in accordance with a policy that complies with the provisions of this act. This act is substantially similar to SB 159 (2025) and similar to HCS/HB 1146 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1138 Exempts certain professions from income tax
Sponsor Sen. David Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1138 - This act establishes the "Retaining MO Workers Act". For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act provides that the first $100,000 of income shall be subtracted from a taxpayer's federal adjusted gross income if the taxpayer is employed as any of the following: 1) a first responder, 2) a nurse, 3) a teacher, 4) a veteran of any branch of the Armed Forces of the United States, 5) any state or federal employee, excluding elected officials, 6) a laborer, 7) a commercial truck driver, 8) a nursing home employee, 9) a child care provider, or 10) a lineworker, as such terms are defined in the act. This act is substantially similar to SCS/SB 650 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/15/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1146 Modifies provisions relating to port authorities
Sponsor Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 1146 - This act modifies provisions relating to port authorities. Current law prohibits a city from creating a port authority if the city is located within a county that has created a port authority which has received approval as a political subdivision of this state. This act provided that this shall not be construed as invalidating any port authority created by a city and approved as a political subdivision prior to the creation of a port authority by a county. (Section 68.010.3) If a port authority whose port district includes Kansas City shall purchase or lease real property anywhere in such counties, the real property shall be deemed included within the port district. (Section 68.015.1). Powers of port authorities are also modified as specified in the act, including the grant of powers for the establishment of port rangers licensed as peace officer, and contracting with other port authorities. (Section 68.025). The act provides that failure of a port authority to include a statement that the state is not liable on bonds of a port authority as required by law shall not invalidate the bonds or render the state liable on the bonds. (Section 68.040). Furthermore, the act modifies provisions regarding the terms of port authority commissioners and their removal from office, as well as determination of commissioners' qualifications, salaries, powers, and duties if they are not determined by the political subdivision establishing the port authority. The political subdivision establishing the port authority shall also provide for the filing of annual reports by the board of port authority commissioners, and for periodic independent audits of the port authority's accounts. (Section 68.045). The act modifies port authorities' contracting processes for work, equipment, and supplies and materials, and provides that port authorities may utilize additional procurement measures authorized for other political subdivisions, as described in the act. (Section 68.055). Under the act, port authority expenditures over $50,000, rather than over $25,000, including professional services contracts, shall be competitively procured. The act requires at least 20 days notice of the letting of the contract, with publication as described in the act. Port authorities shall have the authority to reject any and all bids, and readvertise the work or proposed purchase. (Section 68.057). The act provides that political subdivisions with existing port authorities can not form regional port authorities themselves, but that the boards of existing port authorities may apply to the Highways and Transportation Commission for approval of a regional port authority, as detailed in the act. (Section 68.060). The definition of "new job" in the Advanced Industrial Manufacturing Zones Act is modified to include any job determined by the Department of Economic Development to be eligible for, and approved for, retention of withholding tax under the Missouri Works Program, provided that the establishment of the AIM zone immediately follows the end of the period of benefits under the Missouri Works Program. (Section 68.075). Under the act, certain records submitted to a port authority may be deemed closed records, and disclosure to a port authority shall not affect records' status as closed. (Section 68.085). The act modifies the threshold for consent to the creation of a port improvement district, from 60% per capita to 50% per capita, of the owners of all real property within the boundaries of the proposed port improvement district. (Section 68.205). Lastly, the act provides that a petition to the circuit court shall not be required for creation of a port improvement district within port district boundaries or for substantial changes, as defined by law, to a port improvement district in certain circumstances. (Section 68.253). This act is similar to SCS/HCS/HB 1346 (2025) and SCS/SB 715 (2025).TAYLOR MIDDLETON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/09/2026

SB1162 Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1162 - Current law authorizes counties to adopt an ordinance allowing for the payment of property taxes in installments. This act requires that counties do so. (Sections 139.052 and 139.053) This act also requires that, prior to selling delinquent property for back taxes, a collector shall notify a taxpayer that the ability to pay delinquent taxes in installments is available to the taxpayer. (Section 140.120) Finally, current law authorizes a collector to sell delinquent property to satisfy delinquent taxes, interest, and penalties owed to the county. This act provides that a collector shall not commence such sale for a period of fifteen years following the date the property becomes delinquent. This provision shall not apply to delinquent property that is abandoned property, which is defined as property that is delinquent for three consecutive years and for which the collector is unable to contact the property owner. (Section 140.150)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1163 Authorizes a tax credit for certain educational expenses
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1163 - For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act authorizes a taxpayer to claim a tax credit in an amount equal to one hundred percent of qualified expenses incurred during the tax year for educating a qualified student in a nonpublic school, as such term is defined in the act, provided that no tax credit shall exceed the state adequacy target. Tax credits authorized by the act shall not be transferred, sold, or assigned, but are refundable. A tax credit shall not be issued for any qualified expenses paid for using a Missouri Empowerment Scholarship account. To be eligible for a tax credit, a taxpayer shall have enrolled a qualified student in a nonpublic school during the tax year, and shall not have enrolled a qualified student in the taxpayer's resident school district during the tax year for which the taxpayer is claiming a tax credit. Tax credits authorized by the act shall be claimed by the taxpayer at the time such taxpayer files a return. This act shall sunset on August 28, 2032, unless reauthorized by the General Assembly. This act is identical to SCS/SBs 195 & 53 (2025) and SB 867 (2024), and to a provision in HCS/HB 1935 (2024), and is substantially similar to HCS/HB 77 (2025), SB 729 (2024), HB 1911 (2024), and HB 2366 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1165 Requires school districts to establish a policy allowing students to be excused from class to receive religious or moral instruction off school property
Sponsor Sen. Mike Moon (R)
Summary
SB 1165 - This act requires the school board of each school district to establish a policy authorizing students to be excused from class to attend a course in religious or moral instruction taught by an independent entity off school property. Such instruction is defined in the act as a "released time course". The policy shall provide that students may be excused for up to three class periods per week or a maximum of 125 class periods per school year. The student's parent or legal guardian shall provide written consent prior to the student's participation in a released time course. No school district funds, except minimal administrative costs, shall be used, and no school personnel, equipment, or resources shall be involved in providing the instruction. The independent entity offering a released time course shall maintain attendance records and make them available to the school district and its board. Transportation to and from the instruction site shall be the responsibility of the independent entity, the student, or the student's parent or legal guardian. The independent entity or the student's parent or legal guardian shall indemnify and hold the school district harmless regarding any liability arising from student conduct that does not occur on school property under the district's control or supervision, and shall maintain adequate insurance for this purpose. The student shall be responsible for any missed school work. The school district superintendent, principal, or their designees shall have discretion over the scheduling and timing of released time courses, ensuring students are not excused during courses in English language arts, mathematics, science, or U.S. history. The school district, its school board, and the state shall not be liable for students participating in released time courses when the students are not under the district's control or supervision. For purposes of calculating average daily attendance and establishing compliance with the compulsory attendance law, a student attending a released time course shall be considered in attendance in the school district, and the time shall be counted as part of the school day. The school board shall award elective credit for work completed in a released time course, substantiated by a transcript from the independent entity providing the course. The evaluation of the course for credit should be neutral and secular, considering factors including classroom instruction time, course syllabus, assessment methods, and instructor qualifications. The provisions of the act shall not apply to charter schools or to virtual schools. This act is identical to SB 698 (2025) and similar to HB 1393 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1172 Establishes the "Cronkite New Voices Act" to protect the freedom of press in school-sponsored media
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 1172 - This act establishes the "Cronkite New Voices Act", which provides that in both public high schools and public institutions of higher education, a student journalist, as defined in the act, has the right to exercise freedom of speech and of the press in school-sponsored media. In school districts, the district and student-media advisors may regulate the number, length, frequency, and format of school-sponsored media. School districts shall not engage in prior restraint of school-sponsored media except in the circumstances described in the act. Student journalists shall be responsible for determining the content of school-sponsored media, while student-media advisors are responsible for teaching and encouraging expression and the standards of English and journalism. No student-media advisor shall be subject to disciplinary actions described in the act for refusal to abridge or infringe upon freedom of expression. No publication or other exercise of the rights provided under this act shall be deemed an expression of school or institutional policy. No school district, institution of higher education, or employee of such entities shall be held liable in any civil or criminal action for any publication or other exercise of rights provided under this act, except to the extent that such an entity or person actively participated in conduct that is the subject of a civil or criminal action. School districts and their employees may also be liable if they knew of such conduct and failed to take timely action to prevent or withdraw the publication or expression that is the subject of the action. Student journalists who are not minors may be liable based on material for which they were responsible or involved. School districts shall adopt a written freedom of the press policy that includes reasonable provisions for the time, place, and manner of student expression. The policy may also restrict speech that is offensive, threatening, or that fits other similar descriptions provided in the act. This act is identical to SB 258 (2025), SB 1217 (2024), SB 440 (2023), SB 855 (2022), SB 434 (2021), HB 480 (2021), SB 923 (2020), HCS/HBs 743 & 673 (2019), and HB 1940 (2018), and is substantially similar to HB 1668 (2022), HB 2317 (2020) and HCS/HB 576 (2019).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1175 Creates new provisions relating to ethics
Sponsor Sen. Angela Mosley (D)
Summary
SB 1175 - This act provides that any person shall be deemed of bad moral character, untrustworthy, and unfit for elected public office or employment with any state or local government if the elected official, while holding elected public office, and by clothing him or herself with the influence, prestige, or authority of his or her public office or through any public or private title, office, or position arising out of or associated with his or her public office, is or has been convicted of: • Stealing campaign funds by deceit or otherwise; • Stealing caucus or associations funds or funds intended for a caucus or association by deceit or otherwise; • Expending campaign funds in violation of current law; or • Converting campaign funds to his or her personal use in violation of current law. Any person deemed unfit for elected public office or employment with the state or any local government shall be barred from elected public office or employment and, if so employed, shall forfeit his or her office and be removed from said employment. Additionally, any elected or appointed official who knowingly, willingly, or purposefully appoints or retains an elected official who is unfit for employment pursuant to this act shall forfeit his or her office. Provisions are included requiring the prosecuting attorney or Attorney General to commence a quo warranto action to remove such an individual from office. This act also provides that any participant of a retirement plan established by the state or local government who is unfit for employment pursuant to this act shall not be eligible to receive any retirement benefits from the plan. The employer of the participant who is declared unfit shall notify the appropriate retirement system and provide information in connection with such conviction or violation. This act is identical to SB 425 (2025), SB 1344 (2024), SB 220 (2023) and SB 926 (2022) and similar to HB 2405 (2024), HB 866 (2023), and SB 576 (2021).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026

SB1184 Requires the General Assembly to approve proposed administrative rules with a fiscal note over $250,000
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1184 - For any proposed administrative rule submitted by a state agency that will result in the expenditure of public funds by a state entity or political subdivision of greater than $250,000, or will result in a loss of income to an individual or business of greater than $250,000, this act requires the state agency to notify the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. The Committee may hold hearings on the proposed rule. Such proposed rule shall not become effective until approved by the General Assembly through passage of a concurrent resolution. The provisions of this act will not apply to emergency rules or rules required by federal law or for federal funding. A state agency shall not file any final order of rulemaking with the Secretary of State until at least 30 days after such final order of rulemaking has been received by the Committee. Further, a state agency shall not file any notice of proposed rulemaking with the Secretary of State without first receiving from, and including a copy of, the written approval of the Governor. This act is similar to SCS/SB 350 (2025) and HB 2554 (2024).JIM ERTLE
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB1185 Moves school board elections to the November general election
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1185 - This act moves the general municipal election day from the first Tuesday after the first Tuesday in April to the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. Additionally, all bond and tax elections must be held on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of even-numbered years. The act further modifies provisions for school board elections. Under current law, elections for school board members are held on either the general municipal election day or such day as is specified in the county charter, with terms of office ranging from three years to six years, depending on the district. This act requires all such elections to be held at the November general election and makes all such terms four years. This act has a delayed effective date of January 1, 2027. This act contains provisions identical to SB 485 (2025) and similar to HB 539 (2025), HB 2536 (2024), SB 234 (2023), and provisions in SB 740 (2022), HCS/HB 2306 (2022), HB 361 (2019), and HCS/HB 1424 (2018).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1188 Modifies provisions relating to tax credits
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1188 - This act modifies provisions relating to tax credits.PROGRAM SUNSETS This act adds a sunset date of August 28, 2032, to the following tax credits and programs:1. Neighborhood Assistance Act (Section 32.125)2. MDFB loan security and contribution tax credit (Section 100.286)3. Jobs Now Act (Section 100.293)4. Business Use Incentives for Large-Scale Development (BUILD) (Section 100.850)5. Investments in Missouri Small Businesses (Section 135.432)6. Youth Opportunities and Violence Prevention (Section 135.460)7. Rehabilitation and Construction of Residences in Distressed Communities (Section 135.487)8. Small Business Expenditures for ADA Access (Section 135.490)9. Community-Based Faculty Preceptor (Section 135.690)10. Residential Treatment Agency Tax Credit (Section 135.1150)11. Developmental Disability Care Provider (Section 135.1180)12. Bank S Corporation Tax Credit (Section 143.471)13. Shared Care Tax Credit (Section 192.2015)14. Family Development Account Contribution Tax Credit (Section 208.770)15. Family Farms Act Tax Credit (Section 348.505)16. Abandoned Property Tax Credit (Section 447.708) This act adds a sunset date of August 28, 2029, to the following tax credits and programs:1. Missouri Working Family Tax Credit (Section 143.177)TAX CREDIT ADMINISTERING AGENCIES This act transfers the administering agency for the following tax credits:1. Surviving Spouses of Public Safety Officers, to the Department of Public Safety (Section 135.090)2. Adoption Tax Credit Act, to the Department of Social Services (Sections 135.326 and 135.339)3. Champion for Children, to the Department of Social Services (Section 135.341)4. Small Business Expenditures for ADA Access, to the Department of Economic Development (Section 135.490)5. Residential Renovations for Disability, to the Department of Economic Development (Section 135.562)6. Donated Food, to the Department of Social Services (Section 135.647)7. High Ethanol Blend Retailer Tax Credit, to the Department of Agriculture (Section 135.772)8. Biodiesel Blend Retailer Tax Credit, to the Department of Agriculture (Section 135.775)9. Biodiesel Producer Tax Credit, to the Department of Agriculture (Section 135.778)TAX CREDIT ANNUAL LIMITS For the following tax credits, beginning with FY 2027, the act applies an annual limit on the amount of tax credits that may be issued in a fiscal year. The limit shall be equal to the highest amount of tax credits issued for such tax credit during FY 2024-2026 period:1. Surviving Spouses of Public Safety Officers, to the Department of Public Safety (Section 135.090)2. New or Expanded Business Facility (Section 135.110)3. Small Business Expenditures for ADA Access (Section 135.490)4. Residential Treatment Agency Tax Credit (Section 135.1150)5. Developmental Disability Care Provider (Section 135.1180)6. Self-employed Health Insurance Tax Credit (Section 143.119)7. Bank S Corporation Tax Credit (Section 143.471)8. Shared Care Tax Credit (Section 192.2015)9. Abandoned Property Tax Credit (Section 447.708) For the following tax credits, beginning January 1, 2028, the act applies an annual limit on the amount of tax credits that may be issued in a calendar year. The limit shall be equal to the highest amount of tax credits issued for such tax credit during FY 2025-2027 period:1. Missouri Working Family Tax Credit (Section 143.177)TAX CREDIT APPROPRIATIONS (Section 135.835) For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act places a maximum three year carry-forward on all tax credit programs. Additionally, the act subjects all tax credits to appropriations, with the following exceptions:1. Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (Section 135.352)2. Show MO Act (Section 135.750)3. Self-employed Health Insurance Tax Credit (Section 143.119)4. Missouri Working Family Tax Credit (Section 143.177)5. SALT Parity Tax Credit (Section 143.436)6. Bank S Corporation Tax Credit (Section 143.471)7. Bank Franchise Tax Credit (Section 148.030)REPEAL OF TAX CREDITS This act repeals the following tax credit programs:1. Distressed Areas Land Assemblage Tax Credit (Section 99.1205)2. Charcoal Producers Tax Credit (Section 135.313)3. Missouri Certified Capital Company Law (Sections 135.500 to 135.529)4. Distressed Community Tax Credits (Sections 135.535 to 135.546)5. Qualified Beef Tax Credit (Section 135.679)6. Qualified Equity Investment Tax Credit (Sections 135.680 and 135.682)7. Wine and Grape Production Tax Credit (Section 135.700)8. Alternative Fuel Vehicle Refueling Property Tax Credit (Section 135.710)9. Small Business Guaranty Fee Tax Credit (Section 135.766)10. Enhanced Enterprise Zones (Sections 135.950 to 135.973)11. Unmet Health, Hunger, and Hygiene Needs of Children in School Tax Credit (Section 135.1125)12. Higher Education Scholarship Donation Tax Credit (Section 173.196)13. Dry Fire Hydrant Tax Credit (Section 320.093)14. Innovation Center Contribution Tax Credit (Sections 348.300 to 348.318)15. New Enterprise Creation Act (Sections 620.635 to 620.653)16. Missouri Quality Jobs Act (Sections 620.1875 to 620.1890)17. Innovation Campus Tax Credit (Section 620.2600)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1191 Exempts certain families from income tax
Sponsor Sen. Jill Carter (R)
Summary
SB 1191 - For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act exempts from state income taxes all taxpayers with three or more children for which the taxpayer is entitled to a dependency exemption for federal income tax purposes.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1193 Prohibits expenditures by state departments for certain diversity initiatives
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SB 1193 - This act prohibits any state department from expending funds, allocating funds, or making any other gift or expense for intradepartmental programs, staffing, or other initiatives associated with "diversity, equity, and inclusion" or "diversity, inclusion, and belonging" or any other similar initiative, as described in the act. This act does not prohibit state departments from following anti-discrimination laws or complying with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. This act is similar to the perfected HB 742 (2025).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB1194 Establishes new accountability measures for public schools, charter schools, school districts, and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SB 1194 - This act repeals provisions relating to annual report cards for elementary and secondary schools and establishes new accountability measures for all public schools, charter schools, school districts, and the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). The State Board of Education may assign duties specified in the act to DESE or contract with a third party under state law. By July 15 of each year, the State Board of Education shall provide a confidential version of the school accountability report cards to each school district, public school, and charter school. Within 36 hours of the delivery of the embargoed report cards, the report cards shall be published on the DESE website in a clear and easily accessible location, and by August 15 of each year, the report cards shall be published in a clear and easily accessible location on each school or district website. The State Board of Education shall assign each school district, public school, and charter school a letter grade rating of A-F based on a 0-100 scale, where an "A" rating represents excellent student outcomes, a "B" rating represents more than satisfactory outcomes, a "C" rating represents satisfactory outcomes, a "D" rating represents less than satisfactory outcomes, and an "F" rating represents a failure to produce adequate outcomes. Each public school and public charter school shall earn a school rating and may be eligible to earn a performance-based funding award based upon student performance on the state-mandated annual summative assessments. A school district, public school, or charter school that does not test at least 95% of its students in the annual assessments shall have its rating lowered by one level. The "Show Me Success Program" is created to provide financial awards to schools that experience high student performance. The program includes a "Success Ready Graduate" measure for high schools. If funds are available, public schools and charter schools shall receive $100 per student if the school is in the top 5% of student performance statewide under criteria established by the State Board of Education. A school may earn $50 per student if the school is in the top 10% but below the top 5% of student performance statewide. These rewards shall begin after the 2026-27 state-mandated annual summative assessment and shall be based on the results of such assessment. Funds shall be used for nonrecurring bonuses to school faculty and classroom staff. DESE shall use a criteria-referenced growth measure, called "growth to proficiency", in addition to the existing normative value-added growth measure. Growth to proficiency shall evaluate for each student with two consecutive years of Missouri Assessment Program performance levels whether that student has made sufficient academic progress to put such student on a trajectory to reach grade-level proficiency within three years or by 10th grade, whichever comes first. The act describes the factors that shall be used in determining a school's or a school district's A-F rating. These factors include students' academic achievement status, academic growth, and, for high schools, the four-year graduation rate and a success ready graduate measure to be calculated by DESE based upon factors including students' achievement of Advanced Placement scores of 3 or higher, International Baccalaureate scores of 4 or higher, dual enrollment course completions with a "C" grade or higher, and career and technical education certificates, as provided in the act. For schools serving students in kindergarten through 8th grade, academic achievement level shall represent 40% of the rating, value-added growth shall represent 30% of the rating, and growth to proficiency shall represent 30% of the rating. For high schools, academic achievement level shall represent 25% of the rating, value-added growth shall represent 25% of the rating, growth to proficiency shall represent 25% of the rating, the success ready graduate measure shall represent 15% of the rating, and the student four-year graduation rate shall represent 10% percent of the rating. School districts, public schools, and charter schools shall also report, for high schools, the number of graduates who, within six months of graduation, attend postsecondary education or training programs, serve in the military or in national or community service, or are employed in a living-wage career as determined by a governmental agency or non-governmental organization with expertise in living-wage calculation. The State Board of Education shall additionally develop an annual accountability report card for DESE for the purpose of providing information about DESE's performance in supporting districts and schools in producing positive outcomes for students. This report card shall consider factors specified in the act, such as the school and district ratings, student proficiency on the statewide assessments, and an anonymous annual survey of all leaders of Missouri local educational agencies regarding their satisfaction with DESE's efficacy and timeliness of support and communication. The A-F grading scale for schools shall automatically increase to ensure rigor in the calculation such that when success is achieved, the following school year, expectations are raised so performance does not stagnate. Specifically, when 65% percent of schools earn an A or a B, the following school year, the school grading scale shall increase by five percentage points to earn an A, B, C, and D.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/24/2026
S - Superseded by SB 1653

SB1196 Modifies provisions relating to grants for certain workforce training programs
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Standing Committee on Higher Education and Workforce Development by a vote of 12 to 1. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for SB 1196. WORKFORCE DIPLOMA (Section 173.831) Currently, the Workforce Diploma Program is set to expire in 2028. This bill removes the sunset for this program. MISSOURI HIGHER EDUCATION WORKFORCE POLICY PRIORITIZATION (Section 173.1541) The bill creates the "Missouri Higher Education Workforce Policy Prioritization Act" and requires the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development (DHEWD), in consultation with public institutions of higher education, to develop a funding model for public institutions of higher education. The funding model will provide a level of stable, sustainable resources, align funding to develop educated persons to meet the professional and workforce needs, be based on the 2024 House special interim committee on higher education funding and include the findings of 2023 study commissioned by the DHEWD, include a process for allocation of core appropriations, use a cost-based approach to funding, and include a performance component designed to enhance student success and efficient operations. The model will clearly specify institutional actions that will support additional performance or workforce appropriations. The DHEWD will establish a plan for the testing and implementation of the funding model to be approved by the Coordinating Board for Higher Education, as specified in the bill, and submit the plan to the Governor and General Assembly before October 15th, 2026. The DHWED will also submit a report on the effectiveness of the funding model test to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, the President Pro Tem of the Senate and the Governor before November 15th, 2026. The funding model must be approved by the Board before December 1, 2026, and must be approved by the General Assembly by concurrent resolution. Beginning in the 2028-29 fiscal year, if approved, the funding model will be used for appropriating funding for public institutions of higher education and any appropriation of state funding to an institution for the 2028-29 fiscal year will not be less than the appropriation received by that institution for the previous fiscal year unless the appropriations for all institutions described in this bill are reduced proportionately. FAST TRACK WORKFORCE INCENTIVE GRANT (Section 173.2553) This bill increases the maximum gross income for eligibility for the Fast Track Workforce Incentive Grant from $80,000 to $100,000 for taxpayers who are married filing jointly and from $40,000 to $50,000 for all other taxpayers. The bill modifies the definition of "eligible training provider" to require that organizations have legally operated in Missouri for no less than 12 consecutive months. WORKFORCE PELL GRANTS (173.2573, 620.511 to 620.514 This bill allows the Governor, in consultation with the Board, to approve all eligible workforce training programs for participation in the workforce Pell grant program. The Board must coordinate approval of eligible workforce training programs with other state and federal workforce programs. The bill transfers the Board from the Department of Economic Development to the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development with a statute transfer for Sections 620.511 to 620.514 to Sections 173.2570 to 173.2573. EMERGENCY CLAUSE (Section 173.2553, 173.2570 to 173.2573) Certain Sections of this bill contain an emergency clause. The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the Perfected Senate version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that these are important programs that ensure Missourians have access to education. The increase in eligibility for fasttrack grants will provide opportunity for more Missourians, and the matching of the federal language for workforce pell grants will ensure that federal dollars will be available for these programs. The importance of having an emergency clause is in order for these changes to occur before the start of the fall semesters. Testifying in person for the bill was Senator Henderson; Graduation Alliance; Council on Public Higher Education; Arnie Dienoff; FGA Action; Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry; and Brian Millner, Missouri Community College Association. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: 3rd Reading
Last Action
05/14/2026
H - Emergency clause Defeated - Y-2 N-132

SB1198 Requires public schools to provide instruction in human growth and development
Sponsor Sen. David Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1198 - Under this act, all public schools shall provide instruction in human growth and development as part of their curriculum. Topics to be covered include human biology related to pregnancy, human development inside the womb, and visual materials including a high-definition ultrasound video illustrating early organ development and a computer-generated animation depicting fertilization and each stage of fetal growth through birth. The curriculum shall be presented to students in grades 1-6 in an age-appropriate manner and shall be continued for students in grades 7-8 in a developmentally suitable manner. High school students shall receive human growth and development instruction as a condition for graduation, with the content integrated into health or science education and aligned with state academic performance standards. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education shall develop instructional guidelines, educational materials, teacher training programs, and related resources to support the incorporation of this curriculum, either within existing courses or as a separate course of study. This act contains an emergency clause.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1199 Prohibits certain diversity initiatives in public bodies
Sponsor Sen. David Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1199 - This act prohibits any department, division, or other entity of the state, or any political subdivision from expending funds for intradepartmental programs, staffing, or other initiatives associated with "diversity, equity, and inclusion" or "diversity, inclusion, and belonging" or any other similar initiative, as described in the act. This act does not prohibit state departments from following anti-discrimination laws or complying with the federal Americans with Disabilities Act.This provision is substantially similar to the perfected HB 742 (2025).The act also prohibits any oversight body, as that term is defined in the act, from requiring, as a condition of receiving an occupational license, any person to receive training or otherwise participate in any initiative associated with “diversity, equity, and inclusion” or “diversity, inclusion, and belonging” or any other initiative that promotes: • The preferential treatment of any individual or group of individuals based on race, color, religion, sex, gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, national origin, or ancestry; • The concept that disparities between groups are solely the result of oppression; • Collective guilt ideologies; • Intersectional or divisive identity activism; or • The limiting of freedom of conscience, thought, or speech.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB1202 Modifies provisions relating to the assessment of certain broadband communications equipment
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SB 1202 - This act provides that the definition of "tangible personal property" shall, for the purposes of property taxation, include machinery and equipment used to provide broadband communications service, as described in the act. (Section 137.010) This act also creates a new subclass of tangible personal property that includes machinery and equipment used to provide broadband communications service and that is placed in service on or after August 28, 2026. All such property shall be assessed at 12% of its true value in money for the 2027-2033 calendar years, and at 33.3% of its true value in money for the 2034 and all subsequent calendar years. (Sections 137.080 and 137.115)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/11/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-General Laws

SB1203 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Adam Schnelting (R)
Summary
SB 1203 - This act modifies provisions relating to taxation.TAXATION BALLOT MEASURE LANGUAGE This act requires any ballot measure seeking to add, change, or modify a tax on real property to express the effect of the proposed change within the ballot language in terms of the change in dollars owed per $100,000 of a property's market valuation. (Section 137.067) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 119 (2025), HCS/HB 517 (2025), HCS/HB 531 (2025), HB 660 (2025), HCS/HB 2058 (2024), HCS/HB 1517 (2024), HCS/HB 2140 (2024), CCS/HS/HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 96 (2023), and HCS/SS#3/SCS/SB 131 (2023).LOCAL PROPERTY TAX LEVY CALCULATIONS Current law allows for an inflationary growth factor in assessed valuation for the purposes of calculating property tax levies, with such growth factor not to exceed the lesser of the consumer price index or five percent. This act reduces the allowable growth factor to the lesser of the consumer price index or three percent. (Section 137.073.2(4)) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 517 (2025). Additionally, current law considers any aggregate increase in valuation of personal property over the previous year as new construction and improvements for the purposes of calculating property tax levies. Beginning January 1, 2027, this act provides that such amounts shall not be considered new construction and improvements. (Section 137.073.4(1)) This provision is identical to a provision in SB 264 (2025), HB 43 (2025), SCS/HB 629 (2025), and is substantially similar to a provision in SB 359 (2025) and HB 464 (2025).PERSONAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENT RATE Current law requires that personal property be assessed at 33.3% of its true value in money. Beginning January 1, 2027, this act reduces such percentage to 32%. (Section 137.115.1)INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX Current law imposes a graduated income tax rate and authorizes reductions in the top rate of income tax contingent on certain state revenue collections, with an eventual top rate of 4.5%. This act provides that, for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, there shall be a flat income tax rate of either 4.7% or 4.6% on all taxable income. Beginning with the 2027 calendar year, the rate of tax may be reduced by at least 0.1%, but by no more than 1.0%, if the amount of net general revenue collections in the previous fiscal year exceeds the highest amount of such collections from any of the three previous fiscal years by at least $175 million. The eventual rate of tax if all reductions authorized by the act and by current law are made shall be 3.4% or 3.3%. (Section 143.011)This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 798 (2025).COMBINED INCOME TAX RETURNS For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act provides that there shall be one column for the calculation of total Missouri combined adjusted gross income on the Missouri income tax return for combined returns. (Section 143.031) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 798 (2025).INDIVIDUAL INCOME TAX STANDARD DEDUCTION Current law provides that the Missouri standard deduction shall be equal to the federal standard deduction. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act provides that the Missouri standard deduction shall be equal to the federal standard deduction plus $4,000. (Section 143.131) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 798 (2025).NATIONAL GUARD INCOME TAX DEDUCTION Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for salary earned as compensation for certain duties performed for the National Guard. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act adds performance of state-funded military orders of the National Guard, commonly known as state active duty (SAD) or state emergency duty (SED), to such eligible duties. (Section 143.175)EARNED INCOME TAX CREDIT Current law authorizes an income tax credit in an amount equal to a percentage of the taxpayer's federal earned income tax credit. This act repeals such tax credit. (Section 143.177) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 798 (2025).DEFICIENCIES DUE TO DENIED TAX CREDITS This act provides that a taxpayer shall not be liable for penalties or interest on an income tax balance due if such taxpayer is denied part or all of a tax credit to which the taxpayer has qualified pursuant to any provision of law due to lack of available funds, and such denial causes a balance-due notice to be generated by the Department of Revenue or any other redeeming agency. Such taxpayer shall pay the balance due within sixty days or be subject to penalties and interest pursuant to current law. (Section 143.512) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SS/SB 67 (2025). This act is identical to provisions in HCS/SCS/SB 163 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1211 Modifies provisions relating to property tax payments
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SB 1211 - Current law authorizes counties to provide for the payment of real and personal property taxes in installments, but excludes township counties from utilizing such payment plans. This act repeals such prohibition for township counties. This act is identical to HB 388 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
SB1212 Modifies provisions relating to property assessments
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SB 1212 - Current law requires assessors to assess personal property at a rate of 33.3% of true value, and residential, agricultural, and all other real property at rates of 19%, 12%, and 32%, respectively. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act requires the State Tax Commission to calculate the total assessed valuation for each subclass of real property, individually, and for personal property, in the aggregate. If such amount for a class or subclass exceeds such amount from the previous year for such class or subclass by more than the percent increase in inflation or five percent, whichever is less, the State Tax Commission shall adjust the assessment percentage for that class or subclass of property so that the total assessed value for that class or subclass does not exceed the amount from the previous year plus the allowable growth factor. The calculations and adjustments to the assessment percentage required by the act shall be completed and submitted to each county assessor by no later than August 7 of each year. (Section 137.115) Additionally, current law requires assessors to send the assessor's book to the county governing body by July 1 of each year. This act changes such date to June 1. Current law requires county clerks to forward an abstract of the assessment book to the State Tax Commission and to the governing body of each political subdivision by July 20 of each year. This act changes such date to June 20. (Section 137.245)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1224 Modifies provisions relating to searches and seizures on private property by public entities
Sponsor Sen. Mike Moon (R)
Summary
SB 1224 - This act modifies provisions relating to searches and seizures of private property by public entities.SEARCHES AND SEIZURES ON PROPERTY FENCED OR ENTRY NOT PERMITTED (SECTION 542.296) This act provides that a search and seizure of a person's private property is unlawful if such search and seizure was made without a warrant on the property of a landowner who fenced or posted a "no trespassing" sign on the property, or, by some other means, indicated unmistakably that entry is not permitted, except in the case of national security or in the case of a missing person. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 625 (2025), SB 1089 (2024), SB 309 (2023), and SB 1027 (2022).CAMERAS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY (SECTION 542.525) This act repeals provisions relating to obtaining permission from a chief law enforcement officer to place surveillance cameras on private property. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 625 (2025), HB 209 (2025), HB 561 (2025), in HB 1609 (2024), HB 1788 (2024), in HCS/HBs 178, 179 & 401 (2023), HB 335 (2023), in HCS/HB 1694 (2022), and HB 2612 (2022).TRISTAN BENSON, JR.
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026

SB1237 Modifies provisions regarding income taxes, including the imposition of a 4% flat income tax
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1237 - Current law imposes a graduated income tax rate and authorizes reductions in the top rate of income tax contingent on certain state revenue collections, with an eventual top rate of 4.5%. This act provides that, for all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, there shall be a flat income tax rate of 4% on all taxable income. This act also provides for additional reductions in the rate of tax until the income tax is eliminated. The reductions shall be equal to 0.1% and shall occur when the amount of net general revenue collected in the previous fiscal year exceeds the highest amount of net general revenue collected in any of the three fiscal years prior to such fiscal year by at least $120 million. (Section 143.011) Current law also authorizes an income tax deduction for a portion of federal income taxes paid. This act eliminates such deduction beginning with the 2027 tax year. (Section 143.171) This act is identical to SB 5 (2025 First Extraordinary Session) and is similar to SB 220 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1239 Authorizes a sales tax exemption for food
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1239 - Current law taxes retail sales of food, as defined in current law, at a rate of one percent. This act provides that retail sales of food shall be exempt from state sales taxes. This provision is identical to SCS/SB 161 (2023) and to a provision in SCS/HCS/HB 154 (2023), and is substantially similar to HB 1418 (2024), HB 1464 (2024), HB 2174 (2024), HB 260 (2023), HB 452 (2023), HB 591 (2023), HB 896 (2023), HCS#2/HB 1992 (2022), HB 1817 (2022), and HB 2530 (2022), and to a provision in HB 2815 (2024), HB 2887 (2024), HB 377 (2023), HCS/HBs 876, 771, 676 & 551 (2023), HB 1136 (2023), HB 1779 (2022), and HB 2249 (2022). This act also provides that, beginning on January 1, 2027, local sales taxes imposed on food shall annually be reduced in four equal increments over a period of four years. Beginning January 1, 2031, there shall be no local sales taxes imposed on food. (Section 144.014) This act is identical to provisions in SB 57 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/25/2026
S - Superseded by SB 1017

SB1240 Eliminates the individual income tax
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1240 - Current law imposes an income tax on all Missouri taxable income. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act eliminates the Missouri individual income tax.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1241 Authorizes an income tax deduction for tipped income
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1241 - For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, this act authorizes an income tax deduction for the first $25,000 in tipped income, as defined in the act, earned by a taxpayer.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1258 Modifies the retirement allowance multiplier for certain members of the Public School Retirement System
Sponsor Sen. Maggie Nurrenbern (D)
Summary
SB 1258 - Current law provides that the normal retirement allowance multiplier for a member of the Public School Retirement System of Missouri is 2.5% of the member's final average salary for each year of the membership service, except if the member has 32 years or more of service, then the multiplier shall be 2.55%. This act provides that for those members with 33 years of service or more the multiplier factor shall be 2.6%. This act is substantially similar to SB 474 (2025) and SCS/SB 877 (2024), a provision in the perfected SS/SB 898 (2024), and in SCS/HCS/HB 2431 (2024) and is similar to SB 556 (2023).KATIE O’BRIEN
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026

SB1265 Creates new provisions relating to illegal aliens
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1265 - This act modifies various provisions relating to illegal aliens.SANCTUARY CITIES (Section 67.307) The act provides that any municipality that enacts or adopts a sanctuary policy shall be subject to a fine of $25,500 for each day on which the municipality has such sanctuary policy in effect.E-VERIFY (Section 285.530) Current law requires only public employers to enroll and actively participate in a federal work authorization program, while all other employers are permitted, but not required, to enroll and participate. This act requires all employers to enroll and actively participate in a federal work authorization program. This provision is identical to a provision in SB 1373 (2024), substantially similar to provisions in SB 528 (2025) and HB 120 (2025), and similar to a provision in HB 1515 (2024), a provision in HCS/HB 2489 (2024), a provision in HB 2844 (2024), and a provision in HCS/HB 188 (2023).OFFENSE OF TRANSPORTATION, CONCEALMENT, OR INDUCEMENT OF ILLEGAL ALIENS (Section 577.675) The act expands the offense of transportation of an illegal alien to include the concealment or inducement of an illegal alien. Any person is guilty of such an offense, punished as a class D felony, if he or she knowingly:• Conceals, harbors or shields or attempts to conceal, harbor or shield an illegal alien from detection in any place in this state, including any building or any means of transportation, if the person knows or recklessly disregards the fact that the alien has come to, has entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law; or• Encourages or induces an alien to come to or reside in this state.LOCAL ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS (Section 590.250) The act allows any law enforcement officer or agency to enforce the provisions of federal immigration law that establish criminal penalties. This act is identical to SB 114 (2025) and substantially similar to SB 1138 (2024), SB 1373 (2024), HB 2470 (2024), SB 130 (2023), and SB 1227 (2022).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026

SB1270 Requires public schools and charter schools to provide free feminine hygiene products to female students in grades 4-12
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 1270 - This act requires public schools and charter schools that include any of grades 4-12 to make at least one type of feminine hygiene product, as provided in the act, available in each school building for use by female students at no cost. Each school board and charter school governing body shall adopt policies establishing procedures for the distribution of feminine hygiene products and guidance regarding the safe use of such products, as well as prohibiting the resale or misuse of feminine hygiene products that are distributed to female students in accordance with the provisions of the act. This act is identical to SB 342 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1271 Creates and modifies provisions relating to lactation accommodations in public schools and charter schools
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 1271 - Current law requires school districts to adopt a written policy regarding the provision of certain accommodations for lactating employees, teachers, and students. This act requires charter schools, in addition to school districts, to adopt such a policy and provide such accommodations. The act specifies that each school building shall contain suitable accommodation in the form of a "private and secure" room designated for the exclusive use of women and "lactating students" that includes certain features established in current law, such as running water, a refrigerator for breast milk storage, and electrical outlets. Additionally, a public school or charter school shall ensure that a lactating student is given a reasonable amount of time to accommodate the need to express breast milk, and a student shall not incur an academic penalty as a result of the use, during the school day, of the accommodations provided for under the act. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education shall develop a model policy that satisfies the provisions of the act before January 1, 2027. School districts and charter schools shall adopt a written policy pursuant to the provisions of the act before July 1, 2027. This act is similar to SB 343 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1273 Establishes provisions relating to school property
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SB 1273 - Under this act, cities, counties, and school districts (defined as "political subdivisions") shall not adopt or enforce any ordinance, policy, resolution, deed restriction, property use restriction, or other such restriction that prevents property they sell, lease, or transfer from being used for any lawful educational purpose by a charter school. The act also prohibits any deed restriction or other such restriction that limits property to specific non-educational uses. Any existing restriction that bars property previously used for educational purposes from being used for future educational purposes is void. Any ordinance, policy, regulation, deed, use restriction, or contract made in violation of this act is void from its inception. This provision is similar to provisions in SB 398 (2025), HB 447 (2025), HB 1044 (2025), SB 1006 (2024), SB 1123 (2024), HB 2088 (2024), HB 2178 (2024), SB 304 (2023), SB 650 (2022), HB 2087 (2022), SCS/SB 55, 25, & 23 (2021), SB 315 (2021), HCS/HB 137 (2021), HB 322 (2021), HB 729 (2021), SB 649 (2020), SB 603 (2020), HB 1917 (2020), SB 51 (2019), SCS/SB 271 (2019), SS#2/SCS/SB 292 (2019), SCS/HB 485 (2019), HCS/SS/SB 218 (2019), HCS/HB 581 (2019), and HCS/HB 924 (2019). Additionally, when a school district offers to sell or lease an unused school building or facility that is not being used for academic, extracurricular, administrative, or athletic purposes, and that either has no approved plan for future use or has a plan that has not been carried out within two years, the contract shall include a right of first refusal allowing a public entity to purchase or lease the property first. The term "public entity" includes the state of Missouri and any of its political subdivisions, such as cities, counties, boards, agencies, or authorities. If the school district accepts an offer to sell or lease the unused building or facility to a non-public entity, such district shall post a public notice on its website stating that the property is available. The public notice shall include the property's square footage, the district's contact information, and a statement that the right of first refusal expires 60 days after this notification. If no offer from a non-public entity exists, a public entity may initiate negotiations to buy or lease an unused school building or facility. The school district shall begin good-faith negotiations within 60 days of the public entity's engagement, and negotiations shall last up to 30 days. An independent mediator shall obtain appraisals to determine a fair market sale or lease price. If multiple public entities express interest in the unused building or facility, the school district shall decide which entity shall purchase or lease the property. During negotiations, the school district may choose whether to sell or lease the property, at fair market value or less. A lease shall allow reasonable access and use of shared common areas. If a public entity leases the entire facility and incurs debt to make improvements, the school district shall subordinate its lease interest to that debt. The public entity shall have six months from the date of its written offer to complete the purchase or lease. While leasing, the public entity shall be responsible for all direct expenses, including utilities, insurance, maintenance, property taxes, and repairs. If a public entity later decides to sell a facility it purchased from a school district, such public entity shall first offer the property back to that district, following the same procedures set forth in the act.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1277 Creates new provisions relating to federal guidance
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1277 - This act requires each state department, within fifteen days of receiving a guidance document from the federal government, to publish the guidance document on a website designated by the department director. Each guidance document shall be published in a conspicuous manner with a hyperlink that provides access to the guidance documents. Within 15 days of a guidance document being rescinded, a state department shall maintain the rescinded guidance document on the website and indicate that the document has been rescinded along with the date that the guidance document was rescinded.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB1278 Prohibits elementary and secondary schools and institutions of postsecondary education from being members of athletic organizations that allow students to use performance enhancing drugs
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1278 - This act provides that no public school, private school, public charter school, public school district, or public or private institution of postsecondary education shall be a member of any statewide athletic activities association or national intercollegiate athletics organization that allows students to take performance enhancing drugs. Any public school, private school, public charter school, public school district, or public or private institution of postsecondary education that violates this act shall not receive any state aid or other revenues from the state. The parent or guardian of any student, or any student who is over eighteen years old, who is deprived of an athletic opportunity as a result of a violation of the act shall have a cause of action for injunctive or other equitable relief as described in the act. This act is identical to SB 55 (2025) and similar to SB 1440 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1279 Modifies an income tax deduction for contributions to 529 savings accounts
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1279 - Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for contributions made to a 529 savings account, with such deduction limited to $8,000 for single filers and $16,000 for married filing combined filers. This act removes the limits such that 100% of such contributions shall be deductible.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/11/2026

SB1280 Creates and modifies provisions relating to access to pornographic materials
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1280 - Currently, public schools and public libraries are required to take certain actions to prevent minors from accessing pornographic materials on a public access computer. This act adds charter schools, digital library catalogs, and explicit sexual material to these provisions of law. The act defines a "digital library catalog" as an electronic database, application, or website that lists or provides resources or materials, including, but not limited to, books, electronic books, periodicals, and multimedia content, including, but not limited to, images, audio, and videos. The definition of "public access computer" established in current law is modified to include a computer "or other electronic device" that is located in an elementary or secondary public school, "charter school", or public library, and is connected to an "electronic" communication system, instead of a "computer" communication system. (Section 182.825) A public school or charter school shall provide parents access to the school's digital library catalog provided to students. Additionally, each school district and charter school shall appoint an administrator of the digital library catalog whose duties shall include excluding from the digital library catalog any resource or material that is "explicit sexual material" or "pornographic for minors", as those terms are defined in current law. The identity and workplace location of the administrator of a digital library catalog shall be made available upon request. Each school district and charter school shall adopt a written educational material challenge policy that is easily accessible to the public. Notice of the challenge policy shall be provided to parents of students at least once per school year as part of a curriculum notice. The policy shall allow any taxpayer in the district to dispute or challenge materials provided or recommended by any school employee as explicit sexual material or pornographic for minors. Additionally, a school district or charter school shall maintain a list disclosing to the public the results of all such disputes or challenges and permanently publish such list on the district's or school's website. A student's parent or guardian may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief or for damages, against any school board member, charter school governing body member, or other school official, including library personnel, for intentionally or negligently violating the act. If the parent prevails in establishing negligence by a preponderance of the evidence, the court shall award to the parent $500 per violation plus court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. If the parent prevails in establishing an intentional violation of the act, the court shall award to the parent $2000 per violation plus court costs and reasonable attorney's fees. (Section 182.826) The act adds explicit sexual material to the materials that a public access computer in a public school or public library shall restrict minors from accessing. Charter schools and digital library catalogs are also added to these provisions. A public school, charter school, or public library that provides a public access computer or digital library catalog shall equip every computer or digital library catalog with software that restricts minors' access to material that is pornographic for minors or explicit sexual material, develop and implement by January 1, 2027, a policy that is consistent with community standards and establishes measures to restrict minors from gaining access to such material, or both. School personnel, in addition to school board members, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor for violating these provisions, and on conviction shall be punished by a fine of not more than $500 or imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year. The act also establishes a private cause of action for parents for any such violation that occurs as a result of gross negligence or intentional or willful and wanton misconduct. Finally, the act repeals a provision that certain school officials and library personnel who comply with these provisions shall not be criminally liable or liable for damages that might arise from a minor gaining access to pornographic materials through the use of a public access computer. (Section 182.827) This act is identical to SCS/SB 276 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/03/2026
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-Education

SB1285 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SB 1285 - Current law requires the Director of Revenue to annually publish the updated income brackets for the state income tax. This act requires such publication to be made on the Department's website.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1287 Modifies provisions relating to an income tax deduction for certain retirement benefits
Sponsor Sen. David Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1287 - Current law authorizes a taxpayer to deduct a maximum of the first $6,000 of any retirement allowance received from any privately funded sources if the taxpayer's Missouri adjusted gross income is less than $25,000 if filing single, $32,000 if filing married combined, or $16,000 if filing married separately. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act increases such deduction to $12,000 and increases the income thresholds to $50,000, $64,000, and $32,600, respectively. This act is identical to SB 620 (2025), HB 44 (2025), and HB 2657 (2024), and to a provision in HCS/SS/SB 898 (2024), and is substantially similar to HB 1423 (2024), SB 241 (2023), SB 448 (2023), SB 585 (2023), HB 156 (2023), HB 456 (2023), HB 662 (2023), HB 1206 (2023), SB 871 (2022), HB 2853 (2022), SB 157 (2021), SB 847 (2020), and HB 1725 (2020), and to provisions in HCS/SS#3/SCS/SB 131 (2023), SS/SB 190 (2023), HCS/SB 247 (2023), HS/HCS/HB 356 (2023), and SCS/HCS#2/HB 713 (2023).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026

SB1288 Modifies provisions relating to employment of illegal aliens
Sponsor Sen. David Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1288 - This act modifies provisions governing the employment of unauthorized aliens. Current law provides that a general contractor or subcontractor of any tier shall not be liable when the general contractor or subcontractor contracts with its direct subcontractor who employs an unauthorized alien in violation of law. This act provides that the general contractor or subcontractor shall be liable in such circumstance if the general contractor or subcontractor knows or should have known of the violation. The act modifies the provisions allowing the Attorney General (AG) to enforce the law governing the employment of unauthorized aliens. The AG is given authority to investigate alleged or suspected violations of the law pertaining to the proper classification of employees for purposes of public works projects. Furthermore, the AG is given powers provided by the Merchandising Practices Act for the purpose of investigating any alleged or suspected violation of the law governing the employment of unauthorized aliens. In any action brought by the AG to enforce the provisions of law governing the employment of unauthorized aliens, the state shall have the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the employer knowingly employed, hired for employment, or continued to employ an unauthorized alien to perform work within this state. The AG may seek an injunction prohibiting the employer from employing an unauthorized alien, and seek monetary damages in the amount equal to twice the amount of wages paid by the employer to any unauthorized alien workers during the time in which such unlawful employment is alleged to have occurred. The AG may bring an action for injunctive and monetary relief in the circuit court of any county where the alleged violation is occurring or about to occur, or in the Cole County Circuit Court. If a court determines that an employer has knowingly hired an unauthorized alien, the court shall enter a judgment in favor of the state and award penalties in an amount consistent with the prayer for relief in the petition. The AG may enter into a consent judgment with any person alleged to have committed a violation prohibited by this act.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026

SB1290 Establishes the "Missouri Healthy Schools Act" and prohibits public schools from serving, selling, or allowing a third party to sell ultraprocessed food during the school day
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SB 1290 - This act establishes the "Missouri Healthy Schools Act" and prohibits public schools from serving, selling, or allowing a third party to sell ultraprocessed food, as such term is defined in the act, on campus during the school day. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education shall post on its website a standardized form public schools may use to certify compliance with the provisions of the act, along with a list of each public school that has provided such certification of compliance to the Department. This act is identical to SB 802 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1291 Modifies provisions relating to an income tax deduction for certain farmers
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 1291 - Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for certain income received for the sale or lease of farmland to beginning farmers. This act adds a definition of "taxpayer" to such deduction. This act is substantially similar to SB 682 (2025) and HB 1042 (2025), and to a provision in HCS/SS/SB 67 (2025), HCS/HB 828 (2025), and HCS/SS/SCS/SB 466 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/12/2026

SB1293 Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SB 1293 - This act modifies several provisions relating to property taxes.TAXATION BALLOT LANGUAGE This act requires any ballot measure seeking to add, change, or modify a tax on real property to express the effect of the proposed change within the ballot language in terms of the change in dollars owed per $100,000 of a property's market valuation. (Section 137.067) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/SCS/SB 163 (2025), HCS/HB 119 (2025), HCS/HB 517 (2025), HCS/HB 531 (2025), HB 660 (2025), HCS/HB 2058 (2024), HCS/HB 1517 (2024), HCS/HB 2140 (2024), CCS/HS/HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 96 (2023), and HCS/SS#3/SCS/SB 131 (2023).CALCULATION AND REVISION OF PROPERTY TAX LEVIES Current law provides for the calculation of revenue derived from single tax rates versus tax rates for each class and subclass of property. This act repeals such language. (Section 137.073.2, 137.079, and section 137.115) Current law provides that the aggregate increase in valuation of personal property shall be the new construction and improvements factor for the purposes of calculating property tax rates. This act eliminates the new construction and improvements factor for personal property. (Section 137.073.4(1)) This act requires that all tax levy increases applied to any real and personal property shall be applied to each subclass of property equally. (Section 137.073.5(1)) This act requires that if the voters in a political subdivision approve an increase to the tax rate ceiling prior to the expiration of a previously approved temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling shall remain in effect only until such time as the temporary levy increase expires under the terms originally approved by a vote of the people, at which time the tax rate ceiling shall be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase. If, prior to the expiration of a temporary levy increase, voters are asked to approve an additional permanent levy increase, voters shall be submitted ballot language that clearly indicates that if the permanent levy increase is approved, the temporary levy shall be made permanent. (Section 137.073.5(3)) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 119 (2025), HB 660 (2025), HB 1497 (2025), HCS/HB 2058 (2024), HCS/HB 1517 (2024), HCS/HB 2140 (2024), CCS/HS/HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 96 (2023), and HCS/SS#3/SCS/SB 131 (2023), and is substantially similar to SB 880 (2018) and SB 357 (2017). Current law authorizes the governing body of a political subdivision to levy a tax rate lower than its tax rate ceiling, and to subsequently increase such lowered rate to the tax rate ceiling without voter approval. This act provides that such increase back to the tax rate ceiling shall be made in the immediately following general reassessment. (Section 137.073.5(4)) This provision is identical to a provision in HB 660 (2025) and HB 783 (2025). This act provides that, if the total assessed valuation in a political subdivision decreases in the tax year immediately following a tax year in which the voters approved an increase to the tax rate ceiling, such political subdivision may increase its levy such that the revenue received equals the amount that would have been received from the increased rate of levy had there been no decrease in the total assessed valuation. (Section 137.073.5(6)) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 119 (2025), HB 660 (2025), HB 1497 (2025), HCS/HB 2058 (2024), HCS/HB 1517 (2024), and HCS/HB 2140 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1296 Modifies provisions relating to income tax refunds
Sponsor Sen. Patty Lewis (D)
Summary
SB 1296 - Current law authorizes state agencies to set off all or a portion of a taxpayer's income tax refund to repay debts owed to such state agency. This act modifies the definition of "state agency" to include any municipality with a population over 250,000 for debts arising on or after January 1, 2027. This act is identical to SB 468 (2025) and HB 1884 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1300 Creates and modifies provisions relating to school safety
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1300 - This act creates and modifies provisions relating to education.DESIGNATION OF SCHOOL PROTECTION OFFICERS (Section 160.665) Under this act, any employee of a school district or charter school, rather than only teachers and administrators in school districts, may be designated as school protection officers. The act adds sprays emitting a projectile to the list of self-defense devices that may be carried by a school protection officer. If an employee requests to be designated as a school protection officer, the school board of the school district or governing board of the charter school shall promptly hold a public hearing and determine by a vote at the hearing whether to allow such designation, rather than only holding a public hearing on the subject. The school board or governing board shall also hold a closed meeting and determine by a vote at the closed meeting whether to authorize the designated school protection officer to carry a concealed firearm or self-defense spray device, regardless of whether the employee specifically requested authorization to carry a concealed firearm or self-defense spray device in his or her request for designation as a school protection officer. Each school board of a school district and governing board of a charter school shall hold a public hearing on whether to implement a school protection officer program and determine by a vote at the hearing whether to implement such a program. Any school board or governing board that approves a school protection officer program shall notify all employees of the school district or charter school of the program and the option to request designation as a school protection officer. This provision is identical to provisions in SCS/HB 232 (2025) and SB 792 (2025), and is similar to a provision in HB 2662 (2018).ACTIVE SHOOTER AND INTRUDER RESPONSE TRAINING FOR SCHOOLS PROGRAM (Section 170.315) The act modifies provisions of the Active Shooter and Intruder Response Training for Schools Program (ASIRT). For each school year ending before July 1, 2027, each school district and charter school shall train teachers and employees on how to respond to students who provide information about a threatening situation and how to address situations where there is a potentially dangerous or armed intruder in the school. ASIRT training shall, rather than "may", include information and techniques on how to address situations where an active shooter is present in the school or on the property. This provision is similar to provisions in SCS/HB 232 (2025) and SB 792 (2025).TRAINING STANDARDS FOR SCHOOL PROTECTION OFFICERS (Section 590.205) The act provides that the Director of the Department of Public Safety shall allow private companies to serve as training centers and operate training programs for school protection officers. Additionally, the Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Commission shall establish requirements for the continuing education of all school protection officers. All school protection officers shall annually receive 20 hours of firearms skill development training. Additionally, at least twice per year, all school protection officers shall participate in a joint training on school protection with a local law enforcement agency. This provision is identical to provisions in SCS/HB 232 (2025) and SB 792 (2025). This act is similar to SB 792 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/10/2026
S - Hearing Conducted - Senate-Education

SB1301 Modifies provisions relating to the State Tax Commission's ratio studies
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1301 - This act provides that, in any ratio study in which the State Tax Commission evaluates the assessment ratios of the various counties, the Commission shall require that no county's ratio of assessed values is greater than one. This act is identical to SB 795 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
SB1303 Modifies provisions relating to the classification of certain real property
Sponsor Sen. Mike Moon (R)
Summary
SB 1303 - This act modifies the definition of "residential property" for the purposes of the taxation of real property by providing that such definition shall include single family homes that are leased, in whole or in part, for a term of less than thirty consecutive days. This act is identical to SB 699 (2025) and SB 784 (2025), and to a provision in HB 660 (2025), and is substantially similar to SCS/HB 1086 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026

SB1314 Authorizes parents to choose the school that their children attend
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1314 - Beginning with the 2026-27 school year, each parent or guardian of a child shall be afforded the opportunity at the time of school enrollment to direct that state aid for educating the child that would be used to educate the child at a school within the school district of residence shall be remitted to a qualified school, as defined in the act, of the parent or guardian's choice, if the parent or guardian chooses a school outside of the district of residence. A parent or guardian may also choose to enroll their student at a different school within the school district of residence. The State Treasurer shall create and provide to each school district a form for use by the parent or guardian at the time of enrollment to indicate the parent or guardian's choice as to the school their student will attend for that school year. The school district shall transmit the form to the State Treasurer. The school district shall also notify the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Upon receipt of the form, the State Treasurer shall remit state aid that would have been remitted to the school district of residence to the school chosen by the parent or guardian if such school is outside of the school district of residence. If the student enrolls in a school outside of the school district of residence, the student shall not be counted in the resident school district's weighted average daily attendance as a resident student. The state aid remitted to the school of choice shall be the lesser of the state adequacy target for the student or the amount of tuition at the qualified school. This act contains an emergency clause. This act is identical to SB 572 (2025) and substantially similar to SCS/SB 81 (2023).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1315 Establishes provisions relating to student surveys
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1315 - This act requires schools that receive state funding and are subject to the federal Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPPRA), including charter schools, to notify a student's parent at least 24 hours before presenting a survey to the student. The school must also disclose the full survey contents and obtain written parental consent if the survey asks any question relating to an item protected under the PPRA, including questions regarding political affiliations; mental or psychological problems, including substance abuse issues; sexual behavior or attitudes; illegal, antisocial, self-incriminating, or demeaning behavior; critical appraisals of family members; legally recognized privileged relationships; religious practices, affiliations, or beliefs; or income, except as required to determine eligibility for participation in a program or to receive financial assistance under such program. A school may disclose the survey's contents by posting the survey on the school website on a page that is easily accessible to parents, provided that parents are individually notified of such posting. The Attorney General or the prosecuting or circuit attorney in the county in which a violation of this act occurs may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief, against any school district or charter school, as well as any school official or paid or unpaid agent of a school, for any intentional or grossly negligent violation of the act, or for negligent supervision of an individual leading to a violation of the act. The court shall impose a fine of $500 for each grossly negligent violation and $2000 for each violation that occurs intentionally or as the result of negligent supervision. A student's parent may bring a civil action against any school district or charter school, as well as any school official or paid or unpaid agent of a school, for any intentional or grossly negligent violation of the act that affects such parent's child, or for negligent supervision of an individual leading to a violation that affects such parent's child. The court shall award to the parent $500 plus court costs and reasonable attorney's fees for each grossly negligent violation and $2,000 plus court costs and reasonable attorney's fees for each violation that occurs intentionally or as the result of negligent supervision. This act is identical to SS/SB 223 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/09/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB1316 Prohibits diversity-equity-inclusion requirements in school districts and charter schools
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1316 - This act establishes provisions relating to diversity-equity-inclusion requirements in school districts and charter schools. The act defines diversity-equity-inclusion or "DEI" as education or training requirements, policies, or programs on the subjects of antiracism, implicit bias, or any other related instructions that promote differential treatment based on race, gender, religion, ethnicity, and sexual preference, but not including instruction on state and federal laws prohibiting discrimination. The act prohibits school districts and charter schools from requiring students, employees, and prospective employees to ascribe to, study, be instructed with, or answer questions relating to DEI, as set forth in the act. The act further prohibits school districts and charter schools from offering any student, employee, or prospective employee any incentive, benefit, grant, or other compensation for receiving any instruction or professional development relating to DEI, except in cases where the same incentive, benefit, grant, or compensation is equally available to individuals who are not involved in the DEI instruction or professional development. A school district or charter school shall not reward or give any advantage to any employee or job applicant for any statement advocating DEI ideologies in employment-related decisions. Finally, employees, contractors, volunteers, vendors, or agents of a school district or charter school shall not be required to ascribe to, study, or be instructed with DEI ideologies or materials. The Attorney General or the prosecuting or circuit attorney in the county in which a violation of the act occurs may bring a cause of action against any school district or charter school that violates the act. An attorney acting on behalf of a school district or charter school may request an opinion of the Attorney General as to whether a particular training material or instructional or curricular material complies with the provisions of the act. A parent of a student enrolled in a school district or charter school may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief or for damages, against the school district or charter school for any violation of the act that causes harm to such parent's child. This act is identical to SB 56 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1321 Creates new provisions relating to illegal immigrants
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SB 1321 - This act creates the offense of improper entry by an alien. A person commits the offense of improper entry by an alien if the person enters this state at a time when they are unlawfully present in this country under federal law. The offense of improper entry by an alien is punishable by a fine of $10,000 and shall be subject to an order of removal to a federal port of entry, as provided in the act. For all subsequent offenses, the offense is a class E felony, subject to a term of imprisonment of 1-7 years and a $10,000 fine and additionally shall be subject to an order of removal to a federal port of entry upon the completion of any prison term. Any person serving a term of imprisonment for violation of this act may petition the circuit court for an order of removal in lieu of serving out the term of imprisonment. Such a request shall be granted absent aggravating circumstances. Any person granted such a petition who thereafter returns to this state in violation of federal law shall be subject to completion of the unfinished term of imprisonment and may not apply for any further order of removal. The act allows any law enforcement officer whose duty it is to enforce criminal laws to arrest or detain such person upon probable cause that a person who has violated this act. This act is identical to SB 282 (2025) and SB 1333 (2024) and substantially similar to a provision in SB 1372 (2024) and SB 1520 (2024).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026

SB1324 Creates regulations of artificially generated online content using artificial intelligence
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SB 1324 - The act creates the "Missouri Artificial Intelligence Transparency and Accountability Act". Provisions of the act shall become effective on January 1, 2027. Under the act, any person or entity creating AI-generated content shall label the content as "AI-generated". Labeling requirements are described in the act. Any AI-generated content depicting a real individual shall include an additional disclaimer, as described in the act. Deployers, as defined in the act, shall verify the authenticity of the content before generating the content and shall obtain consent from the individual depicted in the content, except when the content is used for parody or satire. Labels and watermarks on any AI-generated content shall be accessible to individuals with disabilities pursuant to current laws and guidelines, as described in the act. Certain exceptions apply as described in the act. Developers and deployers shall maintain usage logs of all AI systems generating content distributed for public consumption. Requirements for the usage logs are described in the act. Any personal data of the usage logs shall be kept anonymous and protected under current laws, except when requested by law enforcement as described in the act. The Attorney General shall enforce provisions of the act. Any person may report violations of the act to the Attorney General. If the Attorney General finds that a violation occurred, the Attorney General shall commence a civil action. The court may grant relief and civil penalties as described in the act. The act shall not preclude an individual from bringing a private civil action for any violation of the act. Individuals and entities that demonstrate good-faith compliance with the act may raise an affirmative defense to reduce civil penalties, provided they cure any violation within 30 days after receiving notice of the civil action. Within 180 days after the effective date of the act, the Department of Commerce and Insurance may promulgate rules to enforce compliance with the act, as described in the act. The Department shall launch a public awareness campaign to educate Missouri residents about AI-generated content and the residents' rights under the act. The Department shall establish an AI Task Force, as described in the act. Nothing in the act shall preempt any political subdivision from enacting stricter or more stringent ordinances, laws, or rules provided they do not conflict with provisions of the act. The act has a severability clause.JULIA SHEVELEVA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/25/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-General Laws

SB1325 Creates a sub-minimum wage rate for minors
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SB 1325 - This act provides that employers may pay sub-minimum wage rates of $12.30 per hour to any employee who is a minor.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/11/2026

SB1334 Establishes the Vulnerable Child Compassion and Protection Act prohibiting discussion of certain topics by school personnel
Sponsor Sen. Mike Moon (R)
Summary
SB 1334 - This act establishes the "Vulnerable Child Compassion and Protection Act", which prohibits any school official at a public school or charter school from encouraging a student under the age of eighteen years old to adopt a gender identity or sexual relationship, as such terms are defined in the act. This prohibition shall not apply to certain course components of a school's curriculum. The act also establishes provisions prohibiting school officials from withholding information regarding a student's gender identity from his or her parents. A school official shall inform a student's parents within forty-eight hours if the student expresses confusion about his or her gender identity. A school official shall obtain parental consent before addressing a student using a name other than the name provided during enrollment. Finally, a school official shall obtain parental consent before using a pronoun that differs from a student's biological sex as stated on his or her birth certificate or other government record, as provided in the act. No public school or charter school shall require a school official to address someone using a pronoun that does not match the person's biological sex if doing so would be contrary to the school official's religious or moral convictions. A school district or charter school shall determine a reasonable and fair penalty for any school official who knowingly violates any provision of this act. This act is identical to SB 117 (2025), substantially similar to SB 868 (2024), and similar to SCS/SB 134 (2023) and provisions in SCS/SB 728 (2024) and HB 1739 (2024).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1336 Authorizes a tax credit for the purchase of certain homes
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 1336 - For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act authorizes a tax credit in the amount of $5,000 for a taxpayer that is a first-time home buyer purchasing an eligible blighted property, as described in the act. To be eligible, a taxpayer shall also enter into an agreement with the land clearance for redevelopment authority to use such property as a principal residence for at least two years following rehabilitation of the property, shall purchase the property within one year or contract for purchase within six months of applying for a tax credit, and shall meet certain income requirements as described in the act. The tax credit authorized by this act shall not be refundable or transferable, but may be carried forward for five years. This act shall sunset after six years unless reauthorized by the General Assembly. This act is identical to SB 404 (2025), SB 425 (2023), SB 719 (2022), SB 84 (2021), and HB 1588 (2020), and is substantially similar to SB 970 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1341 Authorizes a tax credit for certain educational expenses
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1341 - For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this act authorizes a taxpayer to claim a tax credit in an amount equal to one hundred percent of qualified expenses incurred during the tax year for educating a qualified student in a nonpublic school, as such term is defined in the act, provided that no tax credit shall exceed the state adequacy target. Tax credits authorized by the act shall not be transferred, sold, or assigned, but are refundable. A tax credit shall not be issued for any qualified expenses paid for using a Missouri Empowerment Scholarship account. To be eligible for a tax credit, a taxpayer shall have enrolled a qualified student in a nonpublic school during the tax year, and shall not have enrolled a qualified student in the taxpayer's resident school district during the tax year for which the taxpayer is claiming a tax credit. Tax credits authorized by the act shall be claimed by the taxpayer at the time such taxpayer files a return. This act shall sunset on August 28, 2032, unless reauthorized by the General Assembly. This act is identical to SCS/SBs 195 & 53 (2025) and SB 867 (2024), and to a provision in HCS/HB 1935 (2024), and is substantially similar to HCS/HB 77 (2025), SB 729 (2024), HB 1911 (2024), and HB 2366 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1351 Creates and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary education and establishes the "Student Screen-Time Standards Act", "Framework on Classroom Use of Screens Council", "Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Act", and "Missouri Integrated Safe Driving Program"
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass with HCS" by the Special Committee on Intergovernmental Affairs by a vote of 12 to 2. The following is a summary of the House Committee Substitute for SB 1351. INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY AND CURSIVE WRITING (Sections 160.068, 186.085 & 186.095) This bill creates the "Student Screen-Time Standards Act" and provides definitions for "instructional technology" and before the end of the 2027-28 school year, requires that school districts and charter schools have a policy on screen time and the use of instructional technology for students in grades Kindergarten through five. The bill requires that schools limit the use of screen time and the use of instructional technology both during school hours and as assignments or on school devices after the school day. The policy must provide a process for parents to request information about limits on their child's screen time and instructional technology use and districts must use research, evidence, and information to develop the policy based on best practices. This bill requires parental notification of the policy annually and schools must publish the board policy relating to the use of screen time and instructional technology on the district website. The bill exempts virtual instruction programs from the requirements of this section. This bill directs the Literacy Advisory Council under Section 186.080, RSMo, to provide school districts and the State Board of Education advice on the inclusion of instruction and assessment of cursive writing and reading including the development of a model policy on cursive. The bill directs the Commissioner of Education to establish the "Framework on Classroom Use of Screens Council" or "FOCUS Council" with membership specified in the bill. The Council is directed to meet four times a year in the initial year and at least two times annually after that with the purpose of reviewing best practices regarding screen use and the use of technology in instruction and providing related policy provisions. The bill outlines best practices and policies that must be included and directs the council to submit a report containing the Council's actions and policy proposals to the State Board of Education, the Governor, and the Joint Committee on Education on or before July 1, 2027 and updated every two years annually after that. These provisions are similar to HCS HBs 2230 & 2978. SCHOOL ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT CARDS (Section 160.524) This bill requires the State Board of Education to develop an annual school accountability report card for each public school, and public charter school, in the State, designed to inform the public regarding school performance and to satisfy applicable federal reporting requirements concerning students, staff, finances, and related data. Each report card must be presented in a standardized, clear, and accessible format and include a summary for parents explaining the school's performance level and underlying indicators, identifying strengths and areas for improvement, highlighting year-to-year progress and student academic growth, and describing opportunities for family engagement. The State Board of Education can assign duties specified in the bill to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) or contract with a third party under state law. An embargoed version of each report card must be provided to districts and schools by September 15th annually, subject to an appeals process to be provided by the State Board of Education, and each district and school must publish its report card on its website by October 31st. The State Board of Education must assign each district and school a letter grade of "A" through "F" based on a 0-100 scale and derived from multiple performance measures, with an "A" reflecting excellent student outcomes benchmarked as the top decile of composite scores of certain specified measures. Assessment participation rates below 95% must be separately reported but must not automatically reduce a school's rating. The bill establishes the "Show Me Success Program", subject to appropriation, to provide performance-based funding to public schools and charter schools demonstrating strong academic growth, sustained improvement over multiple years, significant improvement among historically underserved student groups, high levels of postsecondary readiness, or improvement in early literacy outcomes, with funds distributed to classroom incidental funds for teacher recruitment and retention. DESE must develop a criterion-referenced growth measure termed "growth to proficiency", evaluating whether students are on a trajectory to reach or exceed grade level within a specified timeframe, in addition to an existing value-added growth measure. School and district ratings must be based on specified factors, including student proficiency levels on statewide assessments in English language arts, mathematics, and science; academic growth for all students and the lowest-performing quartile; and, for high schools, the four-year graduation rate and a "Success-Ready Graduate" measure incorporating advanced coursework, industry- recognized credentials, dual enrollment, and degree completion. The bill prescribes weighted components for elementary, middle, and high school ratings; mandates annual reporting of post- graduation outcomes for high schools; and requires district-level ratings to be calculated using the same methodology as school- level ratings, as provided in the bill. The State Board of Education must also issue a statewide report card detailing the percentage of students attending schools in each letter-grade category and comparing state assessment performance with results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, with the objective of alignment in proficiency rates. The annual report card requirements established in the bill do not apply to special school districts or state-operated schools serving exclusively students with disabilities. This provision is similar to SCS HCS HB 2710; and HB 2539 (2026). MEDIA LITERACY AND CRITICAL THINKING ACT (Section 161.355) The bill establishes the "Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Act" and defines "media literacy" to include concepts such as, but not limited to: an individual's ability to access, analyze, evaluate, and participate with all forms of media, including news in print and social media content, and recognize bias and stereotypes in media, and Internet safety. This bill requires the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to establish the "Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Pilot Program" for the 2027-28 and 2028-29 school years. Between five and seven diverse schools will be selected by DESE to participate in the Pilot Program as specified in the bill. The Program will address media literacy, develop strategies for student learning in classroom curricula, and demonstrate various literacy strategies used. Pilot Program schools must provide a report to DESE before August 1, 2029, and before January 1, 2030, DESE must compile and submit a summary report to the General Assembly. The Pilot Program terminates June 30, 2029. This section expires December 31, 2029. This provision is similar to HB 1792 (2026). SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CHARTER SCHOOL FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Section 162.192) Under this bill, each school district and charter school must maintain a searchable, publicly accessible database on its website setting forth all financial transactions conducted with school district or charter school funds. The financial ledger must be available without login credentials, registration, or fees, and must be downloadable and exportable in formats specified in the bill. The financial ledger must record transactions using codes set forth in the Missouri Financial Accounting Manual published by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), as applicable. Certain data fields must be included in the financial ledger including the transaction date, transaction amount, revenue or expenditure designation, fund code, function code, object code, vendor or payee name, and a description or memo field. The homepage of each public or charter school's website must include a direct link to the financial ledger of the school district or charter school. The link must make the financial ledger accessible within one click, and must be functional and mobile-responsive. DESE can provide standardized language or icons that public and charter schools can use for this purpose. A school district's or charter school's financial ledger must be updated at least monthly. Details of each calendar month's financial transactions must be posted no later than 45 days after the close of that calendar month. For record keeping purposes, a school district or charter school must maintain at least five fiscal years of historical data on its financial ledger. Protected personal information can be redacted only to the extent required by applicable law. Vendor names, amounts, and accounting codes must not be redacted. Payroll data can be presented in aggregated form where disclosure of individual information is restricted. Debt obligations must be posted in a separate section of the financial ledger, with disclosure of outstanding debt balances, issuance dates, repayment schedules, annual debt service amounts, and debt service as a percentage of total expenditures. DESE can provide or approve standardized templates or platforms school districts and charter schools can use for their financial ledgers. DESE can additionally provide guidance to assist school districts and charter schools with compliance. DESE must promulgate rules establishing procedures and timelines for school districts and charter schools to certify compliance annually. A school district or charter school that violates any provision of this bill can be subject to the withholding of up to 5% of that school year's state aid entitlement for the school district or charter school. DESE must establish a process for members of the public to file complaints if they believe a school district or charter school has violated any provision of the bill. DESE can also establish a public compliance dashboard on DESE's website to enable members of the public to check whether a particular school district or charter school is certified as in compliance. SCHOOL BOARD TERMS (Section 162.481) This bill changes the term of office for members of the Independence School District school board from six years to three years. SCHOOL DISTRICT AND CHARTER SCHOOL LEGAL EXPENSES (Section 162.821) The bill requires school districts and charter schools to include the amount expended for legal services in their Annual Secretary of the Board Report. If the report does not include the amount expended for legal services, then the Attorney General can bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief, against the school district or charter school. Such action must be brought in the county where the school district or charter school is located. STUDENT ATTENDANCE AT SCHEDULED ELECTIONS (Section 167.1001) This bill provides that a student enrolled in a public school governed by an urban school district must not be considered absent for the time such student spends attending a scheduled primary, general, or special election with his or her parent, legal guardian, or person standing in loco parentis to the student. A student can receive only one excused absence during each scheduled election. Upon his or her return to school, the student must be encouraged by school officials to demonstrate his or her attendance at the election by wearing an official sticker, badge, or other item indicating that he or she attended the election. DRIVER EDUCATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS (Section 170.027) This bill creates the "Missouri Integrated Safe Driving Program" and provides that the Program will inform pupils about requirements for obtaining driving permits, emphasis on the knowledge, attitudes, habits, and skills necessary to safely operate a vehicle, instruct on distracted driving and traffic stops, and provide data on driver safety and risky behavior. The Program will also provide instructions on safety concerns relating to pedestrians, commercial motor vehicles, motorcycles and potentially hazardous encounters on the road. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education will receive and vet lessons from districts and professional organizations that will integrate the tenants of the safe driving program into courses that students are taking. Beginning in the 2027-28 school year districts can adopt a plan to implement and use lessons. The instruction does not require physical operation of a vehicle and the bill does not prohibit schools from offering additional driver education courses. This provision is similar to HCS HB 2195; and HS HCS HBs 3068 & 3049 (2026). The following is a summary of the public testimony from the committee hearing. The testimony was based on the Senate perfected version of the bill. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that Independence is the only district in the state with a 6-year term. This bill will reduce the terms to match the other schools in the State. The bill also provides accountability and accessibility in school governance for students and families. Many people struggle to make a six- year commitment to a position on the school board. This is supported by current members. Testifying in person for the bill were Senator Nicola; Missouri NEA; and Arnie C. Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/12/2026
H - ** REVISED for TIME and LOCATION ** - 5/13/26 - 9:30 am - HR 1 - House-Rules-Legislative

SB1353 Requires school districts to include the amount expended for legal services in their Annual Secretary of the Board Report
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1353 - This act requires school districts to include the amount expended for legal services in their Annual Secretary of the Board Report. If the report does not include the amount expended for legal services, then the attorney general may investigate the violation of this subdivision and may bring a civil action, including an action for injunctive relief, against the school district. Such action shall be brought in the county where the school district is located. This act is substantially similar to SB 793 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1364 Requires the Governor to appoint a board of directors to oversee any statewide activities association that facilitates interscholastic activities for secondary school students
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1364 - Under this act, any nonprofit statewide association that facilitates interscholastic activities for secondary school students and that includes at least one public school district as a fee-paying member (defined as an "activities association") shall be overseen by a board of three directors appointed by the Governor, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate. The term of office of each director shall be four years. If the General Assembly is not in session when a position on the board of directors becomes vacant, the Governor shall make a temporary appointment. The board of directors shall have final decision-making power with respect to all actions of an activities association. Upon motion of any party, a matter may be transferred directly to the board at any time during the matter's pendency. Further, the board of directors shall have authority to remove any employee or member of an activities association, with or without cause, at such time and in such manner as the board shall deem proper. This act contains an emergency clause.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1370 Modifies the "Workforce Diploma Program" and establishes new provisions regarding adult eligibility for virtual school courses and programs
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 1370 - This act modifies the "Workforce Diploma Program" and establishes provisions regarding adult eligibility for virtual school courses and programs. Under this act, an adult student may enroll in any state-approved virtual course or full-time virtual program offered by a school district or a public institution of higher education. Adult students are also eligible to enroll in the Missouri Course Access and Virtual School Program. An "adult student" is defined as a Missouri resident over 21 years of age who has not yet earned a high school diploma but is within 12 academic credits or 2 school years of achieving such a diploma. An adult virtual program shall be entitled to a monthly allocation of state aid for adult students in an amount equal to 14% of the state adequacy target per completed course. However, an adult virtual program shall not be entitled to a school district's ordinary school revenue, including local effort revenue, and any state aid allocated to an adult virtual program shall not count toward the constitutional minimum amount of state aid required for the establishment of free public schools in this state. The total amount of funding provided for an adult student enrolled in a virtual program shall not exceed the state adequacy target. No school district with an adult student enrolled in an adult virtual program shall be required to report such adult student's information for purposes of annual performance reports or as required for full-time, school-age virtual students under current law. (Section 161.672) The act modifies the "Workforce Diploma Program" by repealing current requirements relating to funding, the qualification process for program providers, and program performance standards, as well as repealing the "Workforce Diploma Program Fund" and the sunset on such program. Rather than being subject to these repealed provisions, a program provider through the Workforce Diploma Program shall be authorized under the act's provisions regarding adult eligibility for virtual school courses and programs. (Section 173.831) This act is similar to HCS/HB 3239 (2026) and HCS/HB 1516 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/10/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Education

SB1378 Authorizes school districts and charter schools to provide instruction in cursive writing
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SB 1378 - This act authorizes school districts and charter schools to provide instruction in cursive writing to all students by the end of fifth grade and to ensure that each student passes a teacher-constructed test demonstrating competency in both reading and writing cursive. This act is identical to SB 429 (2025) and a provision in SCS/HCS/HB 1569 (2024), and is similar to HB 346 (2025), HB 375 (2025), HB 906 (2025), HB 1237 (2025), SB 1462 (2024), HB 1502 (2024), HB 2094 (2024), HB 2852 (2024), SB 664 (2023), HB 232 (2023), HB 2073 (2022), SB 1071 (2020), HB 1262 (2020), HB 54 (2019), HB 2614 (2018), and a provision in HB 108 (2021).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1383 Authorizes the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to establish an agricultural education program for elementary schools
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
COMMITTEE ACTION: Voted "Do Pass" by the Special Committee on Rural Issues by a vote of 12 to 0. This bill ends the current pilot program for agriculture education in elementary schools and authorizes that beginning in the 2027-28 school year the program can be implemented by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education statewide for all elementary schools that elect to participate. The bill removes the requirement for reporting to the House and Senate committees on agriculture and education and requires the report to be posted on the Department's website. PROPONENTS: Supporters say that agriculture is a driver of the State's economy. Investing in agricultural literacy opens new interests and career paths for students and increases informed decision making as adults. Testifying in person for the bill were Senator Washington; Missouri NEA; Missouri Pork Association; Missouri Cattlemen's Association; Missouri Soybean Association; Missouri Corn Growers Association; Missouri Farm Bureau; and Arnie C. Dienoff. OPPONENTS: There was no opposition voiced to the committee. Written testimony has been submitted for this bill. The full written testimony and witnesses testifying online can be found under Testimony on the bill page on the House website.
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/14/2026
H - Reported Do Pass - House-Rules-Administrative

SB1384 Creates and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary education
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 1384 - Under this act, charter schools and private schools that participate in the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program (defined as "private schools") shall be subject to the same procurement processes, wage standards, and contractual obligations as school districts. (Sections 160.405 and 166.706) No more than 10%, rather than 20%, of the full-time instructional staff of a charter school may be uncertified to teach in the public schools of this state. School districts are authorized to employ uncertified instructional personnel, as long as no more than 10% of a school district's full-time teaching positions are filled by uncertified personnel and certain other conditions are satisfied. Private schools shall employ only certified instructional staff, except that up to 10% of a private school's full-time teaching positions may be filled by uncertified personnel. (Sections 160.420, 166.706, and 168.011) Charter schools and private schools, in addition to school districts, shall be eligible for Innovation Waivers exempting them from certain requirements relating to assessments and accreditation. All school districts and charter schools shall be held to the same reporting standards on their Annual Performance Reports. (Sections 160.518, 160.522, and 166.706) The State Board of Education shall classify and accredit charter schools and private schools in the same manner that school districts are classified and accredited. All public schools, private schools, and charter schools shall be classified using the same assessment systems and accountability measures. (Sections 161.092 and 166.706) The governing body of a school district, private school, or charter school shall comply with all Missouri Sunshine Law requirements for public meetings, including providing advance public notice, and shall additionally provide online public access to all meeting minutes. (Sections 162.012 and 166.706) School districts, private schools, and charter schools shall display annual financial reports on their websites, including information about revenues, expenses, contributions, contracts, and personnel salary schedules. (Sections 162.015 and 166.706) Any charter school that accepts transferring students under any open enrollment program enacted by the General Assembly, as well as any private school, shall set its opening date each school year no earlier than 14 calendar days prior to the first Monday in September. (Sections 171.031 and 166.706)OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1402 Modifies a sales tax exemption for the sale of certain medical devices
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1402 - Current law provides a sales tax exemption for certain durable medical equipment as defined on January 1, 1980 by the federal Medicare program. This act removes the reference to January 1, 1980. Additionally, current law provides a sales tax exemption for the sales or rental of manual and powered wheelchairs, including parts. This act applies the exemption to accessories for such wheelchairs. (Section 144.030) This provision is identical to SB 173 (2023) and to a provision in SB 573 (2025), SB 1180 (2024), HCS/HB 1427 (2024), HB 1817 (2024), HCS/SS/SB 143 (2023), and SCS/HCS/HB 154 (2023), and is similar to SB 943 (2022), HB 1864 (2022), and SB 483 (2021), and to a provision in SS/SCS/SB 649 (2022), SB 743 (2022), CCS/HCS/SB 226 (2021). This act also provides a sales tax exemption for sales of class III medical devices that use electric fields for the purposes of treatment of cancer, including components and repair parts and disposable or single patient use supplies required for the use of such supplies. (Section 144.813) This provision is identical to a provision in SB 573 (2025), SB 1180 (2024), HCS/HB 1427 (2024), HB 1817 (2024), SS/SCS/SB 131 (2023), and SCS/HCS/HB 154 (2023), and is substantially similar to SB 943 (2022), HB 1864 (2022), and SB 483 (2021), and to a provision in SS/SCS/SB 649 (2022), SB 743 (2022), CCS/HCS/SB 226 (2021).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/04/2026

SB1404 Requires school districts and charter schools to notify parents about the use of tutoring programs or services at least half-owned by entities outside the United States
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1404 - This act requires school districts and charter schools to notify parents of enrolled students if the school district or charter school uses, has used in the past 12 months, or in the future intends to use a tutoring program or service that is at least 50% owned by entities outside the United States. The notification shall disclose the majority owner of the tutoring program or service and indicate whether such owner is designated as a foreign adversary of the United States under federal regulations as of the first day of the school year in which the notice is sent to parents. This act is identical to SB 796 (2025) and similar to HCS/HB 1446 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/24/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Education

SB1410 Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Sandy Crawford (R)
Summary
SCS/SBs 1410 & 853 - This act modifies provisions relating to property taxes.   PROPERTY TAX DEADLINES Current law requires a county assessor to provide notification to a taxpayer by no later than June 15 if the assessor increases the taxpayer's real property valuation. This act requires such notice to be provided by no later than June 1. (Section 137.180)   Additionally, current law requires a taxpayer to file an appeal of the taxpayer's assessed valuation by no later than the second Monday in July. This act requires such appeal to be filed by no later than the first Monday in August. (Sections 137.275 to 138.180)   These provisions are identical to SB 853 (2026).   PROPERTY TAX INSTALLMENTS Current law authorizes counties to provide for the payment of real and personal property taxes in installments, but excludes township counties from utilizing such payment plans. This act repeals such prohibition for township counties and allows the form of the installments to be determined by the governing body of the county. (Section 139.053)   This provision is substantially similar to SB 1211 (2026) and HB 388 (2025).   DELINQUENT PROPERTY TAX NOTICES This act authorizes a collector to offer a trusted contact program to a taxpayer, who may designate one or more trusted contacts for the collector to contact in the event the taxpayer has not paid the taxpayer's property tax liability by March 1 of a calendar year. (Section 140.010) JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
05/04/2026

SB1425 Modifies a provision relating to a tax credit for new business facilities
Sponsor Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1425 - Current law authorizes a tax credit for a 10-year period for business headquarters that commence operations in this state on or before December 31, 2030. This act extends such date to December 31, 2040.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026

SB1428 Prohibits educational institutions from mandating COVID-19 vaccines or gene therapy treatments
Sponsor Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1428 - Beginning with the 2026-27 school or academic year, this act prohibits school districts, public schools, and certain institutions of higher education, as well as employees of such entities, from requiring any employee or student to receive a COVID-19 vaccine or gene therapy in order to be physically present at any events, premises, or facilities. A vaccine shall not be required as a condition for employment or for acceptance as a student. Testing for COVID-19 shall not be done without the written consent of the employee, the student, or, for a minor student, all parents or guardians. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education and the Department of Higher Education and Workforce Development are required to investigate any reported violations of the act. A teacher who violates the act may be subject to the suspension or revocation of his or her certificate of license to teach. A student, parent, or school employee may bring a civil action for injunctive relief or damages, or both, for any physical, mental, or emotional injuries caused by a school district's, public school's, or school employee's violation of the act. A school district or institution of higher education that violates the act shall not be entitled to receive state aid or any other revenues of the state until the school district or institution comes into compliance with the act. A student or employee of an institution of higher education may bring a civil action for injunctive relief or damages, or both, for any physical, mental, or emotional injuries caused by a violation of the act by an institution of higher education or an employee thereof. This act is identical to SB 222 (2025) and similar to HB 1807 (2024), SB 159 (2023), HB 1347 (2023), HB 1475 (2022), and to provisions in HB 1130 (2023).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1429 Modifies provisions relating to withholding tax returns
Sponsor Sen. Mike Bernskoetter (R)
Summary
SB 1429 - Current law requires withholding tax returns to be submitted electronically by employers with at least two hundred fifty employees. Beginning January 1, 2026, this act requires such electronic returns for employers with an amount of employees that meets or exceeds the threshold provided in federal law.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1432 Modifies provisions relating to the Missouri Gaming Commission
Sponsor Sen. Mike Bernskoetter (R)
Summary
SB 1432 - Current law imposes an admission fee of $2 for each person embarking on an excursion gambling boat. This act authorizes the Missouri Gaming Commission to annually adjust such fee for inflation. (Section 313.805 and 313.820) Current law also authorizes the Commission to distribute excess moneys in the Gaming Commission Fund for certain purposes. This act provides for a distribution of $15 million to the Department of Natural Resources Historic Preservation Fund for the purpose of preserving and protecting collections of historic artifacts. (Section 313.835)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/23/2026
S - Re-referred to committee - Senate-Select Committee on Gaming

SB1440 Modifies an income tax deduction for contributions to 529 savings accounts
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SB 1440 - Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for contributions made to the Missouri Higher Education Deposit Program, the Missouri Education Program, or to any other qualified tuition program established under 26 U.S.C. Section 529. For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2026, this act removes references to other federal 529 qualified tuition programs so that contributions made to such programs in other states shall not qualify for a Missouri income tax deduction. This act is substantially similar to HB 1272 (2025) and to a provision in HCS/HB 606 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Insurance and Banking

SB1442 Modifies provisions relating to literacy of elementary school students
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 1442 - This act modifies provisions relating to literacy of elementary school students.   EDUCATOR PREPARATION PROGRAMS (Section 161.097) The act requires educator preparation programs to instruct teacher candidates on the selection and use of "high-quality" reading curricula and instructional materials that do not include the three-cueing system, as such term is defined in current law. The act prohibits educator preparation programs from including instruction in, or endorsement of, the three-cueing system.   Beginning July 1, 2027, the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) shall annually review and publicly report on the compliance of educator preparation programs with literacy and reading instruction requirements of current law and those established in the act. The review shall evaluate whether instruction is grounded in the components of evidence-based reading instruction and whether prohibited practices, such as the three-cueing system, are excluded from coursework. Educator preparation programs not in compliance with these requirements shall not be approved to certify new teachers.   STATE AID FOR READING INSTRUCTION (Section 161.241) Subject to appropriation, DESE shall remit to each school district and charter school $500 for each fourth grade student who exhibited a substantial reading deficiency in kindergarten to grade three, or who was identified as dyslexic, and who subsequently scores at the proficient level or higher in reading on the annual summative English language arts assessment administered to fourth grade students.   READING ASSESSMENTS (Sections 167.268 and 167.645) Under this act, school districts and charter schools shall use state-approved reading assessments to assess the reading readiness all students in grades 1-3 during three annual administration windows established by DESE. If a student is identified as having a substantial reading deficiency based on performance on the most recent assessment, the school district or charter school shall notify the parent of the student that, if the child's substantial reading deficiency is not corrected by the end of third grade, as determined by the student's performance on the reading portion of the statewide English Language Arts assessment, the child shall not be promoted to fourth grade unless the child qualifies for a good cause exemption.   A good cause exemption may be granted to students who are English language learners or who have individualized education plans or 504 plans developed under federal law. A good cause exemption may also be granted to a student who has already been retained at least once in kindergarten to third grade.   To request a good cause exemption, a student's teacher shall submit documentation to the school principal recommending the student's promotion, including the type of exemption being requested and the child's existing reading improvement plan or individualized education plan, as appropriate. The principal shall discuss the recommendation with the teacher and determine whether the student qualifies for a good cause exemption. If the principal determines that the student qualifies for the good cause exemption, the principal shall make such recommendation in writing to the superintendent of the school district or the chief administrative officer or governing board of the charter school, who shall accept or reject the recommendation in writing.   School districts shall assist schools with notifying, and charter schools shall notify, the parents of students who are retained of the reasons for the retention, along with a description of the proposed interventions and supports that will be provided to the child to remedy the identified area or areas of reading deficiency in the following school year.   By October 1 annually, each district school board shall report in writing to DESE certain information regarding reading instruction, such as the board's policies regarding student retention and promotion, the number and percentage of students identified as having reading deficiencies or substantial reading deficiencies, the number and percentage of all students retained in kindergarten to third grade due to substantial reading deficiencies, and the total number and percentage of third-grade students who were promoted with good cause exemptions, as provided in the act.   This act is similar to HB 2872 (2026), HB 2914 (2026), and provisions in SB 1628 (2026). OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/01/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB1443 Authorizes a tax credit for certain capital investments
Sponsor Sen. Jamie Burger (R)
Summary
SB 1443 - The Missouri Works program is currently authorized to provide various incentives for the creation and retention of new and existing jobs. This act authorizes the Department of Economic Development to issue tax credits to qualified companies that expend at least $50 million in new capital investments for a project within two years of submitting a notice of intent with the Department. The Department shall respond to a notice of intent within thirty days, provided, however, that a failure to respond within thirty days shall not be construed as an approval of a notice of intent. Tax credits authorized by the act shall not exceed 2.5% of the new capital investment, and shall not exceed the least amount necessary to obtain the qualified company's commitment to initiate the project. Tax credits authorized by the act shall count toward the maximum amount of Missouri Works incentives allowed in a fiscal year as provided under current law.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/21/2026

SB1475 Modifies provisions relating to delinquent property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SB 1475 - This act provides that no county or other political subdivision shall relinquish the authority to collect delinquent taxes or assessments to any other entity. (Section 137.085) Current law provides that a property is delinquent on January 1 following the tax due date, and that a county shall commence proceedings for the satisfaction of the lien within three years if proceeding with an administrative tax sale under chapter 140, or after a two year period of delinquency if proceeding with judicial foreclosure under chapter 141. This act provides that a property shall not be subject to sale or judicial foreclosure until the expiration of a seven year period following delinquency unless the assessed value of the property is less than the lien amount. (Sections 140.160 and 141.260) Current law authorizes the Director of Revenue to contract with collection agencies for the collection of delinquent state taxes. This act provides that neither the Director nor any other county official shall contract with a collection agency for the collection of delinquent property taxes. (Section 140.850) This act contains an emergency clause.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1483 Creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary schools
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 1483 - This act creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary schools.CHARTER SCHOOL STUDENT ELIGIBILITY FOR PREKINDERGARTEN, KINDERGARTEN, AND FIRST GRADE(Sections 160.054 and 160.055) The act adds charter schools to provisions authorizing school districts to require children to have attained the age of three years old by August 1 to be eligible for prekindergarten, five years old by August 1 to be eligible for kindergarten and summer school prior to a kindergarten school term, or six years old on or before any date between August first and October first of that school year for entrance into first grade. A child who completes kindergarten in a charter school shall not be required to meet the minimum age requirements of another school district for entrance into first grade. (Sections 160.054 and 160.055)SPECIAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO CHARTER SCHOOL STUDENTS(Sections 160.415, 162.700, 162.890, and 163.011) Under this act, charter school students served in a special school district in St. Louis County shall be included in the calculation of the special school district's weighted membership and weighted average daily attendance, as such terms are defined in current law, in the same manner that students of the component school districts of the special school district are currently calculated. The definition of "special education pupil count" as used in the foundation formula is modified by specifying that students who are enrolled in a charter school but receiving services from a special school district in St. Louis County shall be included in the pupil count of the special school district instead of that of the charter school. (Sections 160.415 and 163.011) Charter schools shall be responsible for early childhood special educational services, except for charter schools that are part of special school districts. (Section 162.700) The act adds charter schools located within a special school district to a provision that neither the State Board of Education nor any school district within a special school district shall be obligated to establish schools or classes for children with disabilities under any other law that might otherwise impose such requirements. Following the formation of a new special school district, charter schools, in addition to the component districts of the special district and the State Board of Education, shall be required to continue providing whatever services they had previously furnished to children residing in the special district, but only until the special district has adequate resources to assume those responsibilities or for no more than one school term after the special district's formation, whichever comes first. (Section 162.890) SCHOOL BOARD ORGANIZATION AND FINANCES(Sections 162.301, 162.411, and 162.511) The act requires newly elected school boards in seven-director districts to meet within 14 days after the certification of the election results, rather than within 14 days after the election. The act repeals a provision that no compensation shall be granted to the school board secretary or treasurer until their reports and settlements are made and filed or published. (Section 162.301) A majority of all members of a school board of a seven-director or urban school district may vote to delegate to the superintendent decision-making authority regarding contracts, employment, bills, and payments. If such authority is so delegated, the superintendent shall report to the board monthly regarding all decisions made on such items. (Sections 162.301 and 162.511) The act repeals a provision allowing school boards in school districts containing at least one city with a total population of over 30,000 inhabitants to employ an attorney on a retainer basis. (Section 162.411)SCHOOL DISTRICT BONDS(Sections 162.531, 164.131, 164.161, 164.191, 164.201, 164.221, 164.261, 164.301, and 165.141) The act repeals a requirement for the secretary of the school board of an urban school district to keep a register of the bonded indebtedness of the school district. (Section 162.531) The act repeals provisions requiring notice of an urban school district's submission of a loan question at a public election to include the amount of the loan required, and for what purpose. Instead, the notice shall contain certain information required for election notices under state law governing public elections. (Section 164.131) The interest rate on school district bonds shall, in no case, exceed 10% per annum, rather than the highest legal rate allowed by contract. (Section 164.161) Funding and refunding bonds for any school district shall be signed by the "manual or facsimile signature" of the school board president and countersigned by the "manual or facsimile signature" of the school board clerk. The act repeals a provision requiring such bonds to be attested by the clerk of the county commission, as well as a provision requiring the clerk of the school board to keep a record of all renewal bonds issued. (Section 164.191) The act provides that no refunding or renewal bond shall be sold at a price less than 95% of the par value rather than 90%. All sums of money realized from such sales shall be used to redeem, retire, or provide for an escrow account for the redemption or payment of outstanding bonds of the school district and for the payment of costs of issuance, rather than being used only in the redemption of outstanding bonds. (Section 164.201) The act repeals a provision that, whenever school district bonds are redeemed or paid off, such bonds shall be burned or shredded in the presence of two members of the school board and two other credible witnesses. (Section 164.221) Revenue bonds issued by seven-director school districts to pay for dormitories or athletic stadiums shall not bear interest exceeding 10% per annum, rather than 4% per annum. Such bonds may be refunded in whole or in part as provided in current law governing bonds issued by political subdivisions. No refunding of such bonds shall bear interest at a rate exceeding 10% per annum, rather than 6% per annum. (Sections 164.261 and 164.301) The act repeals a requirement for all tax anticipation notes of a school district to be registered, without fee, before delivery in the office of the county treasurer. Rather than showing the name of the purchaser if payable to bearer, tax anticipation notes shall show the name of the district treasurer or bank or trust company acting as a paying agent and note registrar. The act repeals a requirement for such notes to be cancelled once paid, as well as a requirement for the notes, once paid and cancelled, to be submitted to the county treasurer for recording. (Section 165.141)READING INSTRUCTION(Section 170.014) The act repeals a provision allowing reading instruction in public schools to include visual information and strategies that improve background and experiential knowledge, add context, and increase oral language and vocabulary to support comprehension, as long as such information and strategies are not used to teach word reading.SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY(Sections 177.073, 177.086, and 177.091) Currently, school districts may select and purchase sites for construction of certain facilities by an affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of all the members of the school board. This act requires only a majority vote to approve such selections and purchases. The act repeals limits on the types of facilities a school district may purchase. School boards may currently direct the sale or lease of real or personal property belonging to the school district if the property is not required for operation of the school program. Under this act, such property may be sold or leased only if the superintendent determines the property has reasonable value after factoring in the time and costs associated with advertising and processing the sale or lease. All property the superintendent determines does not have reasonable value shall be recycled, destroyed, or disposed of. The school board may, by an affirmative vote of a majority of all board members, transfer district personal property to students or to another school district, with or without compensation. Personal property shall not otherwise be transferred without compensation unless the district has first attempted to sell the property and has not received any bids. District personal property shall be sold or leased to the highest bidder, and all proceeds shall be placed to the credit of the incidental fund. A district may sell real or personal property to a community group or a city, state agency, municipal corporation, or any other political subdivision of the state, rather than any political subdivision located wholly or partially within the boundaries of the district. Public notice of the proposed sale and the agreed-upon purchase price of the property shall be posted at the primary offices of the school district and the governmental entity and on the websites of the school district and the governmental entity, if such websites exist. The district may also use other methods of advertisement it determines are effective. Advertisements for bids on the construction of facilities exceeding an expenditure of $50,000 shall include, or direct potential bidders to, the complete invitation for bids including the project specifications and terms and conditions established for the project. Current law requirements for the advertisements of such bids shall not apply if the district utilizes a cooperative procurement service, state procurement service, or design-build service, as such services are described in current law, or any other procurement mechanism or source selection process authorized under state or federal law that implements an approach to competitive bidding that differs from the provisions of the act. Current law concerning wage rates on public works shall apply to all construction projects governed by any such state or federal law.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1484 Creates new provisions relating to progressive design-build contracts
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 1484 - Current law provides procedures for how a political subdivision may enter into a contract for a design-build project. This act establishes procedures for political subdivisions to enter into progressive design-build contracts. A progressive design-build project is one in which the design, construction, alteration, addition, remodeling, or improvement of any buildings or facilities is under one, progressive contract with a political subdivision, including civil works projects, such as roads, streets, bridges, utilities, airport runways and taxiways, storm drainage and flood control projects, or transit projects and noncivil works projects, such as buildings, site improvements, and other structures, habitable or not, commonly designed by architects. Progressive design-build projects are subject to many of the same requirements as are currently applicable to design-build projects except that it is a two-step process rather than a three-step process. Phase I shall consist of the solicitation and evaluation of qualifications of design-builders. Phase II shall consist of the solicitation and evaluation of proposals describing the design-builder's approach to design development, pre-construction services and construction of the project. The political subdivision shall have discretion to disqualify any design-builder who, in the political subdivision's opinion, lacks the minimum qualifications required to perform the work.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/23/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Government Efficiency

SB1495 Modifies provisions relating to delinquent property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1495 - This act authorizes county collectors to waive all or part of the interest and penalties owed on delinquent taxes if, at the collector's discretion, good cause is shown. This act is identical to SB 725 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1496 Creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary education
Sponsor Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1496 - This act creates, repeals, and modifies provisions relating to elementary and secondary education.MISSOURI EMPOWERMENT SCHOLARSHIP ACCOUNTS PROGRAM(Sections 135.712, 135.713, 135.715, 135.716, 160.410, 160.415, 166.700, and 166.720) The act authorizes the General Assembly to fund student scholarships through the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program by appropriating funds to the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts fund. Such scholarships shall be awarded in an order and in amounts established in current law and shall be governed through parent agreements with educational assistance organizations as provided in current law. No provision of law relating to the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program shall be construed to limit the appropriation authority of the General Assembly. (Sections 135.712 and 135.716) The cumulative amount of tax credits that may be allocated in any one calendar year is doubled, increasing from $75 million to $150 million. (Section 135.713) There shall be a maximum of 15 educational assistance organizations, rather than 10, in any school year. No more than 11 of such organizations, rather than 7, shall have their principal place of business in Greene County, Jackson County, St. Charles County, St. Louis County, or the City of St. Louis. (Section 135.715) Where capacity is available, a charter school shall enroll all students who transfer under the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program. A charter school may receive tuition payments from such students. (Sections 160.410 and 160.415) The definition of "qualified student" is modified by repealing provisions requiring students to have an individualized education plan developed under federal law or to be a member of a household with a total annual income that does not exceed 300% of the income standard used to qualify for free and reduced price lunches. (Section 166.700) The act repeals a provision allowing school districts and charter schools to continue including students in the calculation of the district's or school's weighted average daily attendance for up to five years after the student receives an empowerment scholarship and leaves the school district or charter school. (Section 166.720)CHARTER SCHOOLS(Sections 160.400, 160.405, 160.410, and 160.415) Under this act, charter schools may be operated in any school district in the state. The act repeals provisions limiting charter schools to certain school districts and provisions relating to the accreditation status of school districts in which a charter school may operate. (Section 160.400) The proposed charter of a charter school sponsored and approved by the Missouri Charter Public School Commission shall not require the approval of the State Board of Education. (Section 160.405) The act repeals provisions restricting certain state aid payments only to those charter schools in certain school districts. (Section 160.415) Where capacity is available, a charter school shall enroll all students who transfer under the Missouri Empowerment Scholarship Accounts Program or who enroll under provisions of the act authorizing student transfers among school districts and charter schools. A charter school may receive tuition payments from such students. (Sections 160.410 and 160.415)SCHOOL PROPERTY(Sections 160.422 and 162.092) Under this act, cities, counties, and school districts (defined as "political subdivisions") shall not adopt or enforce any ordinance, policy, or resolution that prevents property they sell, lease, or transfer from being used by a charter school for any lawful educational purpose. The act also prohibits any deed restriction, property use restriction, or other such restriction that limits property to specific uses that exclude use by a charter public school for any lawful educational purpose. Any existing restriction that bars property previously used for educational purposes from being used for future educational purposes by a charter school is void. Any ordinance, policy, regulation, deed, use restriction, or contract made in violation of this act is void from its inception. (Section 160.422) This provision is substantially similar to a provision in SB 1273 (2026) and is similar to provisions in SB 398 (2025), HB 447 (2025), HB 1044 (2025), SB 1006 (2024), SB 1123 (2024), HB 2088 (2024), HB 2178 (2024), SB 304 (2023), SB 650 (2022), HB 2087 (2022), SCS/SB 55, 25, & 23 (2021), SB 315 (2021), HCS/HB 137 (2021), HB 322 (2021), HB 729 (2021), SB 649 (2020), SB 603 (2020), HB 1917 (2020), SB 51 (2019), SCS/SB 271 (2019), SS#2/SCS/SB 292 (2019), SCS/HB 485 (2019), HCS/SS/SB 218 (2019), HCS/HB 581 (2019), and HCS/HB 924 (2019). Additionally, when a school district offers to sell or lease an unused school building or facility that is not being used for academic, extracurricular, administrative, or athletic purposes, and that either has no approved plan for future use or has a plan that has not been carried out within two years, the contract shall include a right of first refusal allowing a public entity to purchase or lease the property first. The term "public entity" includes the state of Missouri and any of its political subdivisions, such as cities, counties, boards, agencies, or authorities. If the school district accepts an offer to sell or lease the unused building or facility to a non-public entity, such district shall post a public notice on its website stating that the property is available. The public notice shall include the property's square footage, the district's contact information, and a statement that the right of first refusal expires 60 days after this notification. If multiple public entities express interest in the unused building or facility, the school district shall decide which entity shall purchase or lease the property. During negotiations, the school district may choose whether to sell or lease the property, at fair market value or less. A lease shall allow reasonable access and use of shared common areas. If a public entity leases the entire facility and incurs debt to make improvements, the school district shall subordinate its lease interest to that debt. The public entity shall have six months from the date of its written offer to complete the purchase or lease. While leasing, the public entity shall be responsible for all direct expenses, including utilities, insurance, maintenance, property taxes, and repairs. If a public entity later decides to sell a facility it purchased from a school district, such public entity shall first offer the property back to that district, following the same procedures set forth in the act. (Section 162.092) This provision is similar to a provision in SB 1273 (2026).STUDENT TRANSFERS(Sections 160.410, 160.415, 167.241, 167.895, and 167.898) Current law authorizes students who reside in an unaccredited school district to transfer to an accredited school district in the same or an adjoining county under certain conditions. This act repeals and modifies provisions limiting these transfers to students in unaccredited school districts. Under the act, any student may transfer to another public school or charter school, including transfers from a student's district of residence ("sending district") to a public school in a nonresident district ("receiving district"), beginning in the 2027-28 school year and in all subsequent school years. Each school board shall adopt a policy to determine its transfer capacity for each grade level and school no later than October 27, 2026. The policy shall be publicly posted on the school district's website. By July 15, 2027, and by the first of each month thereafter, each school district shall report to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) the number of available enrollment slots by grade level and school and the school district's average per pupil expenditure. This information shall also be published in a prominent and publicly accessible place on the school district's website. DESE shall publish and update each school district's transfer capacity on an online portal accessible via the DESE website. The portal shall be updated at least monthly and shall include a search function for users to identify schools with capacity to accept transfer students near their home address. Parents of students who wish to transfer shall notify DESE by August 1, 2027, and by the first day of each month thereafter, and DESE shall assign students to a receiving district or charter school as provided in the act. A receiving district shall accept all students who apply and are assigned to the district, so long as there is capacity for each student. School board policies shall not discriminate against any transfer student on the basis of such student's residential address, academic performance, athletic ability, disability, race, ethnicity, sex, or free and reduced price lunch status. If a request for transfer is denied, an appeal may be taken to the State Board of Education by sending the appeal by certified mail to the superintendent of the receiving school district and to the State Board of Education. Any appeal not heard by the State Board of Education within 60 calendar days shall be deemed granted with immediate effect. DESE shall develop forms for filing appeals, and the State Board of Education shall promulgate rules to establish the appeals process. The act repeals provisions requiring sending districts to make tuition payments to receiving districts. Instead, for purposes of calculating state and federal aid, each transfer student shall be counted as a resident of the receiving district in which the student is enrolled. Tuition shall not be charged to any student or to his or her parent or legal guardian. If the receiving district is part of a special school district, the sending district shall contract with the special school district for the entirety of the costs to provide special education and related services, excluding transportation. The special school district may contract with a sending district for transportation, or the sending district may provide transportation on its own. The act outlines school districts' responsibilities for the provision of special education and related services to students with disabilities. A special school district shall continue to provide special education and related services, excluding transportation, to students with disabilities who transfer to another school within the special school district. If the sending district is a metropolitan school district, it shall remain responsible for providing special education and related services, including transportation, to students with disabilities who transfer to a receiving district. A special school district in an adjoining county to a metropolitan school district may contract with the metropolitan school district for the reimbursement of special education and related services provided by the special school district for transfer students. A receiving district that is not part of a special school district shall not be responsible for providing transportation to transfer students, regardless of whether transportation is identified as a related service within a student's individualized education program. A sending district may contract with a receiving district that is not part of a special school district for transportation of students with disabilities. A seven-director or urban school district may contract with a receiving district that is not part of a special school district in the same or an adjoining county for the reimbursement of special education and related services provided by the receiving district. (Sections 167.895 and 167.898) Where capacity is available, a charter school shall enroll all students who transfer under these provisions. A charter school may receive tuition payments from such students. (Sections 160.410 and 160.415) DESE shall designate at least one receiving district or charter school to which each sending district shall provide transportation. A sending district shall be required to provide transportation only to the school district or charter school designated by DESE. (Section 167.241) These provisions are similar to SCS/SBs 215 & 70 (2025).ADMINISTRATOR CERTIFICATION(Section 168.189) Under this act, a school district may consider, but may not require, any criteria greater than that which is necessary to obtain a Missouri initial administrator certificate under rules promulgated by the State Board of Education. A school district may employ such an individual if the individual holds a master's degree or its equivalent and has at least eight years of experience in an executive role with responsibilities described in the act, and if a waiver specific to the applicant has been granted to the school district for this purpose. Such a waiver shall be valid for no longer than three years and eligible for renewal once. Upon conclusion of the maximum six year waiver period, the State Board of Education may grant the applicant a permanent certificate to serve as an administrator in any school district in the state.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1517 Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SB 1517 - This act modifies provisions relating to property taxes.TAX BALLOT MEASURE LANGUAGE This act provides that a political subdivision or election authority shall not advertise or describe any proposed property tax as not increasing taxes unless failing to adopt the measure would cause an actual increase in the tax rate and adopting the measure would cause the tax rate to stay the same or decrease. (Section 67.496) This act requires an election authority to label tax ballot measures numerically or alphabetically in the order in which they are submitted. (Section 115.240) This act modifies multiple provisions of current law to provide that any ballot measures proposing a new or increased real or personal property tax levy shall be submitted on a general election day and shall include certain information, as described in the act. (Section 115.706 and multiple other sections) LOCAL ELECTIONS This act provides that all general elections for local, state, and national offices and issues shall be conducted on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November. (Section 115.123) PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENTS This act provides that a political subdivision that adopts a tax abatement or similar economic incentive shall decrease any real property tax levy that is increased on property located in the political subdivision that does not receive an abatement. (Section 137.039)PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS Current law provides that new construction and improvements shall not be included in the total assessed valuation for the purposes of calculating property tax levies. This act repeals such provisions. (Sections 137.055 and 137.073) This act requires that if the voters in a political subdivision approve an increase to the tax rate ceiling prior to the expiration of a previously approved temporary levy increase, the new tax rate ceiling shall remain in effect only until such time as the temporary levy increase expires under the terms originally approved by a vote of the people, at which time the tax rate ceiling shall be decreased by the amount of the temporary levy increase. If, prior to the expiration of a temporary levy increase, voters are asked to approve an additional permanent levy increase, voters shall be submitted ballot language that clearly indicates that if the permanent levy increase is approved, the temporary levy shall be made permanent. (Section 137.073.5(3)) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 119 (2025), HB 660 (2025), HB 1497 (2025), HCS/HB 2058 (2024), HCS/HB 1517 (2024), HCS/HB 2140 (2024), CCS/HS/HCS/SS#2/SCS/SB 96 (2023), and HCS/SS#3/SCS/SB 131 (2023), and is substantially similar to SB 880 (2018) and SB 357 (2017). This act provides that, if the total assessed valuation in a political subdivision decreases in the tax year immediately following a tax year in which the voters approved an increase to the tax rate ceiling, such political subdivision may increase its levy such that the revenue received equals the amount that would have been received from the increased rate of levy had there been no decrease in the total assessed valuation. (Section 137.073.5(6)) This provision is identical to a provision in HCS/HB 119 (2025), HB 660 (2025), HB 1497 (2025), HCS/HB 2058 (2024), HCS/HB 1517 (2024), and HCS/HB 2140 (2024). Current law requires an assessor to conduct a physical inspection of any residential real property prior to increasing the assessed valuation of such property by more than 15%. This act applies such requirement to all utility, industrial, commercial, railroad and other non-agricultural real property. (Section 137.115.10) PROPERTY TAX CREDITS Current law allows counties to provide a property tax credit to certain seniors. This act requires counties to provide such credit and makes technical changes to the definitions of "eligible credit amount" and "eligible taxpayer". The act also requires the statement of tax due to include certain information about the proportional amount of the credit attributable to each taxing jurisdiction. Finally, the act provides that the credit shall apply to all property tax levies, including debt service levies. (Section 137.1050) Current law also allows counties to provide a property tax credit to all other taxpayers, with certain counties able to annually increase the real property tax liability by five percent or the percent increase in inflation, whichever is greater. This act limits such increase to the lesser of the two amounts. (Section 137.1055)TOTALED MOTOR VEHICLE PROPERTY TAX CREDIT This act authorizes any taxing entity to provide a property tax credit to a taxpayer to reduce the total personal property tax owed on a totaled motor vehicle. The amount of the property tax credit shall be equal to the amount of property tax owed on such vehicle, prorated for the amount of months left in the tax year. In order to authorize a property tax credit pursuant to the act, the governing body of the taxing entity shall adopt an ordinance, as described in the act. (Section 139.035) This provision is identical to HCS/HB 708 (2025).PROPERTY TAX INSTALLMENTS Current law authorizes counties to provide for the payment of real and personal property taxes in installments, but excludes township counties from utilizing such payment plans. This act repeals such prohibition for township counties. (Section 139.053) This provision is identical to SB 1211 (2026) and HB 388 (2025).SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPERTY TAX LEVIES Current law requires school districts to impose a property tax levy for operating purposes of not less than $2.75 in order to receive the full amount of state aid. This act lowers such required levy to $1.50 beginning with the 2026-2027 school year. (Section 163.021)BLIND PENSION FUND Current law imposes a state property tax of $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation for the purposes of funding the Blind Pension Fund. This act eliminates such property tax upon the adoption of a constitutional amendment requiring the General Assembly to appropriate moneys to the Blind Pension Fund. (Section 209.130)SEVERABILITY This act contains a severability clause. (Section B)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
SB1521 Modifies provisions relating to notifications for increased property assessments
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SB 1521 - Current law requires assessors to provide notice to taxpayers when the valuation of the taxpayer's real property has increased. This act requires an assessor to provide any third party documents, reports, or other data that was relied upon in the computation of assessed value. This act is identical to SB 787 (2025) and to provisions in SCS/SB 85 (2025) and HB 780 (2025), and is substantially similar to provisions in HB 1582 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1522 Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SB 1522 - This act modifies provisions relating to property taxes.PROPERTY INSPECTIONS Current law requires an assessor to perform a physical inspection of a parcel of residential real property prior to increasing the valuation of such property by more than fifteen percent. This act clarifies that the owner of such property shall have at least thirty days prior to the physical inspection to notify the assessor that the owner desires an interior inspection. Additionally, the act requires the physical inspection to be completed prior to July 1 of the reassessment year. (Section 137.115)PROPERTY TAX ASSESSMENTS This act provides that if the common level of assessment, as defined in the act, in a subclass is lower than the individual level of assessment, as defined in the act, of any parcel in such subclass, then the individual level of assessment for such parcel shall be reduced to the common level of assessment. Such reduction shall be made upon an appeal by the taxpayer. (Section 137.132)PROPERTY TAX APPEALS Current law provides that, in any appeal in which an assessor fails to provide evidence of a physical inspection required by law, the taxpayer shall prevail as a matter of law. This act also provides that the assessor's increased assessed valuation shall be void in its entirety and the previous assessed valuation shall be applied. (Section 138.060) This act provides that if a transfer of ownership of real property occurs after January 1 of a non-reassessment year, the new owner shall be entitled to appeal the assessed value of such property directly to the State Tax Commission by no later than December 31 of such year, regardless of whether the previous owner appealed the value of the property during the previous reassessment year. (Section 138.135) Current law authorizes any first class charter county or city not within a county to require, by ordinance or charter, the reimbursement of just and reasonable appraisal costs, attorney fees, and court costs resulting from hearings before the State Tax Commission for taxpayer appeals of property assessments. This act requires such reimbursements. This act also increases the maximum amount of fees to be reimbursed from $1,000 to $5,000 for residential property appeals, and from $4,000 to $5,000 for utility, industrial railroad, or other subclass three property appeals. (Section 138.434)PROTESTED PROPERTY TAXES Current law requires a taxpayer to file a written protest of property taxes with the collector at the same time such taxpayer makes full payment of such taxes. This act repeals such requirement. This act also provides that the interest due to a taxpayer whose protested taxes were distributed to a taxing authority shall be calculated from the date that the protested taxes were distributed to the taxing authority through the date of the refund. Any taxpayer determined by a circuit court or the State Tax Commission to be entitled to a refund of property taxes shall receive such refund from the collector within thirty days of the final determination of the refund amount by the circuit court or State Tax Commission. If such refund is not issued within thirty days, the taxpayer shall be entitled to interest on the refund as calculated under current law. (Section 139.031) This act is identical to SB 786 (2025) and SB 1001 (2024), and is substantially similar to SB 786 (2025), HB 1582 (2025), HCS/HB 2445 (2024), SS/SB 95 (2023), and SB 1108 (2022), and to provisions in SS/SCS/SB 15 (2023).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1524 Prohibits the transfer of any balance at the end of a biennium in certain state funds to the state general revenue fund
Sponsor Sen. Justin Brown (R)
Summary
SB 1524 - This act provides that any balance in the following funds shall not be transferred to the state general revenue fund at the end of any biennium: the Highway Patrol Academy Fund, the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund, the Boiler and Pressure Vessels Safety Fund, and the Elevator Safety Fund.JIM ERTLE
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Appropriations

SB1529 Modifies provisions relating to public labor organizations
Sponsor Sen. Stephen Webber (D)
Summary
SB 1529 - This act creates new provisions relating to the bargaining process over labor agreements between public labor organizations and public bodies. Within 30 days after a labor organization has been designated as the exclusive bargaining representative for the public employees in a bargaining unit the bargaining process must begin with representatives of the public body and representatives of the labor organization meeting and bargaining in good faith, as that term is defined in the act, for an agreement covering the wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment for the public employees within the bargaining unit. The labor organization and the public body shall engage in good faith bargaining with each other's designated representatives. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached within 180 days after a labor organization is designated as exclusive bargaining representative for the public employees in a bargaining unit, the dispute shall be referred to mediation. If, after 90 days, mediation has not been successful then the matter shall be referred to arbitration as described below. At any time during the bargaining process, if either the labor organization or the public body determines an impasse has been reached over wages, benefits, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment, the party may submit the matter to interest arbitration. If the parties agree that an impasse has been reached, within seven days of such decision the public body and labor organization shall attempt to agree upon an impartial arbitrator to resolve the impasse. If an arbitrator cannot be agreed upon within such time period then the party that made the initial determination of impasse shall request a panel of seven arbitrators from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services. The parties shall alternate striking from the panel one arbitrator at a time until a single arbitrator is left, with the party that made the initial determination of impasse striking first. Once an arbitrator has been selected, the parties shall proceed to present their arguments. Within 45 days the arbitrator shall submit its decision. The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding upon the parties, provided that any provision that would require the enactment of law for its implementation shall not be binding until such time as the law is enacted. If, at any time during the bargaining process for an initial contract or for successor contracts, either the labor organization or public body believes the opposing party has engaged in bad faith bargaining in violation of this act it may submit the matter to the State Board of Mediation for determination. If the Board determines a party has engaged in bad faith bargaining in violation of this act it shall refer the matter to interest arbitration in accordance with this act.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1534 Modifies provisions relating to the exclusion of certain transactions from sales tax
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SCS/SB 1534 - This act excludes credit card and debit card processing fees from the definition of "gross receipts" for the purpose of imposing sales taxes.   This act is identical to HB 1707 (2026). JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/01/2026
S - Removed from Senate Hearing Agenda - 4/2/26 - 9:30 am - Senate Lounge - Senate-Fiscal Oversight

SB1556 Modifies provisions relating to land banks
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SB 1556 - This act makes technical changes throughout state law relating to the sale of delinquent property to satisfy delinquent property taxes. (Multiple sections) Current law requires a parcel located in certain counties to have unpaid taxes for a period of at least two years prior to the county satisfying such delinquent taxes through judicial foreclosure rather than through sale at auction. This act repeals such two year requirement. (Section 140.010 and 141.230) Current law provides for the appointment of county land bank directors by various agencies. This act provides that the appointment of such directors shall be appointed by the county executive pursuant to the county charter. (Section 140.982) This provision is substantially similar to SB 845 (2026). Current law requires a land bank agency to verify that a buyer is not the original owner or relative owner of the property. This act repeals such requirement. (Section 140.987) Current law allows a land bank agency to purchase a parcel of real property only for the purpose of adding to a parcel already owned by the land bank agency. This act repeals such provision. (Section 141.984) This act is identical to HB 2898 (2026).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026

SB1558 Provides that private schools shall not be civilly liable for establishing single-sex restrooms and changing rooms
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 1558 - This act provides that private schools serving students from prekindergarten through 12th grade shall not be civilly liable for designating restrooms and changing areas for the exclusive use of males or females only, based on the biological sex listed on an individual's original birth certificate. Exceptions are allowed for maintenance staff, emergency medical assistance, or parents accompanying children aged eight or younger with school permission. Additionally, political subdivisions are prohibited from passing rules that would prevent private schools from establishing single-sex facilities. Any political subdivision that violates this act shall cover the private school’s legal costs in any resulting lawsuit. The act contains an emergency clause. This act is identical to HB 1893 (2026), HCS/HB 1197 (2025), and to provisions in HCS/SS/SB 38 (2025) and HCS/SS/SB 160 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
S - Voted Do Pass - Senate-Education

SB1567 Establishes the "Missouri Integrated Safe Driving Program" to provide standardized driver education instruction and training for pupils in grades 9-12
Sponsor Sen. Jamie Burger (R)
Summary
SB 1567 - This act establishes the "Missouri Integrated Safe Driving Program" to provide standardized driver education instruction and training for pupils in grades 9-12. The program shall include instruction on the safe operation of motor vehicles, the rules of the road, and applicable motor vehicle laws, including Missouri's driver licensing system. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) shall receive and review sample instructional lessons from recognized statewide professional organizations and school districts and shall make approved sample lessons available to school districts and charter schools. Beginning with the 2027–28 school year, school districts and charter schools may implement a plan adopting the program and may utilize the sample lessons provided by DESE. The program shall promote knowledge, attitudes, habits, and skills necessary for safe driving; address distracted driving as a significant traffic safety concern; explain law enforcement procedures during traffic stops; and provide current data regarding risky driving behaviors. Districts may require pupil participation in program-related lessons within existing courses, as provided in the act. The program shall not require pupils to physically operate a motor vehicle; nor shall the program be construed to prohibit school districts or charter schools from offering other elective driver education courses. This act is substantially similar to HB 2195 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026

SB1575 Modifies provisions relating to capital gains taxes
Sponsor Sen. Sandy Crawford (R)
Summary
SB 1575 - Current law authorizes an income tax deduction for 100% of income reported as a capital gain for federal income tax purposes. This act provides that depreciation that has been deducted for federal tax purposes but recovered upon the sale of the asset, and thus treated as ordinary income for federal tax purposes, shall be considered a capital gain and excluded from income tax for state tax purposes. (Section 143.121) The act also applies such capital gains tax provisions to the taxable income of a resident estate or trust. (Section 143.341) This act is identical to HB 2945 (2026).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/29/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1583 Modifies provisions relating to a property tax for senior services
Sponsor Sen. Maggie Nurrenbern (D)
Summary
SB 1583 - Current law authorizes counties to impose a property tax of $0.05 per $100 assessed valuation for providing services to persons 60 years of age or older. This act increases the allowable levy to $0.10 per $100 assessed valuation. The act also requires the board of directors responsible for the administrative control and management of the Senior Citizens' Services Fund to be accredited by a statewide nonprofit organization advancing the well-being of older adults across the state, as described in the act. This act is identical to HB 2734 (2026).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1585 Creates new provisions relating to public school employees and labor organizations
Sponsor Sen. Adam Schnelting (R)
Summary
SB 1585 - This act provides that a labor organization or public body may not place a restriction on the time that a public employee of a school district may join or terminate membership in a labor organization.SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1600 Requires school districts to screen all students at least once before third grade for the purpose of identifying gifted students
Sponsor Sen. Maggie Nurrenbern (D)
Summary
SB 1600 - Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, this act requires school districts to conduct universal screenings of all students at least once before 3rd grade for the purpose of identifying gifted students. These screenings shall use valid, reliable, and current testing methods; provide a body of evidence from at least two distinct areas such as general mental ability, academic achievement, creativity, reasoning, problem solving, or various forms of referral; and be reviewed by personnel trained in gifted education or assessment. A child's failure to satisfy the gifted criteria of a single assessment shall not preclude further evaluation or consideration. Additionally, beginning in the 2026-27 school year, each school district shall adopt a board-approved policy that establishes procedures for universal screening of students for gifted program selection and that notifies parents of the screening process annually. A school district's criteria for identifying gifted students shall be guided by recommendations from the Advisory Council on the Education of Gifted and Talented Children established in current law. This act is identical to HCS/HB 1757 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1628 Creates and modifies provisions relating to student evaluations
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SB 1628 - This act creates and modifies provisions relating to student evaluations. SCREENING FOR GIFTED STUDENTS(Section 162.720) Beginning in the 2027-28 school year, this act requires school districts to conduct universal screenings of all students at least once before 3rd grade for the purpose of identifying gifted students. These screenings shall use valid, reliable, and current testing methods; provide a body of evidence from at least two distinct areas such as general mental ability, academic achievement, creativity, reasoning, problem solving, or various forms of referral; and be reviewed by personnel trained in gifted education or assessment. A child's failure to satisfy the gifted criteria of a single assessment shall not preclude further evaluation or consideration. Additionally, beginning in the 2026-27 school year, each school district shall adopt a board-approved policy that establishes procedures for universal screening of students for gifted program selection and that notifies parents of the screening process annually. A school district's criteria for identifying gifted students shall be guided by recommendations from the Advisory Council on the Education of Gifted and Talented Children established in current law. This provision is identical to SB 1600 (2026) and HCS/HB 1757 (2026).LITERACY SCREENING(Sections 167.268, 167.340, and 167.645) The act establishes the "Missouri Universal Reading Screener", a uniform, universal, literacy-based reading assessment administered to students in grades 1-3 three times per year in every school district and charter school in the state. The screener shall score each student in one of the following categories: "below basic", "basic", "grade-level", "proficient", or "advanced". Proficiency benchmarks associated with these categories shall be determined by the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE). School districts and charter schools shall assess all students in grades 1-3 on the Missouri Universal Reading Screener during three annual administration windows established by DESE. DESE shall provide the screener to school districts and charter schools at no cost. The screener may also be used to comply with dyslexia screening requirements established in current law. Student results on the screener shall not be used to make decisions concerning the accreditation of a public school or school district. The act repeals a provision requiring school districts and charter schools to assess newly enrolled students in grades 1-5 on a reading assessment selected from a state-approved list. A student who scores "basic" on the Missouri Universal Reading Screener shall be identified as having a reading deficiency. A student who scores "below basic" on the screener shall be identified as having a substantial reading deficiency. A school district or charter school shall notify the parent of a student with a substantial reading deficiency that if the child's substantial reading deficiency is not corrected by the end of third grade, the child shall not be promoted to fourth grade unless the child qualifies for a good cause exemption. Retention of a third-grade student with a substantial reading deficiency is mandatory unless the unless the child qualifies for a good cause exemption or scores "basic" or higher on a retest opportunity through the Missouri Universal Reading Screener, as provided in the act. A good cause exemption may be granted to students who are English language learners or who have individualized education plans or 504 plans developed under federal law. A good cause exemption may also be granted to a student who has already been retained at least once in kindergarten to third grade. To request a good cause exemption, a student's teacher shall submit documentation to the school principal recommending the student's promotion, including the type of exemption being requested and the child's existing reading improvement plan or individualized education plan, as appropriate. The school principal shall discuss the recommendation with the teacher and determine whether the student qualifies for a good cause exemption. If the school principal determines that the student qualifies for the good cause exemption, the school principal shall make such recommendation in writing to the superintendent, who shall accept or reject the school principal's recommendation in writing. The school district shall assist schools with notifying parents of students who are retained of the reasons for the retention, along with a description of the proposed interventions and supports that will be provided to the child to remedy the identified area or areas of reading deficiency in the following school year. Intensive reading instruction provided to students exhibiting a reading deficiency or substantial reading deficiency shall not include the three-cueing system, as defined in current law, to teach word reading. By October 1 annually, each school board shall report in writing to DESE certain information regarding reading instruction, such as the board's policies regarding student retention and promotion, the number and percentage of students identified as having reading deficiencies or substantial reading deficiencies, the number and percentage of all students retained in kindergarten to third grade due to substantial reading deficiencies, and the total number and percentage of third-grade students who were promoted with good cause exemptions, as provided in the act. These provisions are identical to provisions in SB 1442 (2026) and HB 2872 (2026) and are similar to provisions in HB 2914 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/12/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1639 Modifies provisions relating to public contracts
Sponsor Sen. Jason Bean (R)
Summary
SB 1639 - This act modifies provisions relating to public contracts, specifically contracts entered into by the Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction. Current law authorizes the Director of the Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction to authorize state agencies to establish standing contracts for the purpose of accomplishing construction, renovation, maintenance and repair projects not exceeding $100,000, with job order contracts having a per project expenditure limit of $300,000. This act increases the contract cost limit for contracts to $250,000, with job order contracts having a per project expenditure limit of $750,000. The act also permits the Division of Facilities Management, Design and Construction to enter into master agreements. Master agreements are defined as contracts for architecture, engineering or land surveying services that will be performed on an as-need basis for an indefinite quantity of projects over a defined period. Master agreements may be entered into as provided in the act, provided that the total dollar limitation for a given master agreement is $1,000,000, with each individual project under the agreement limited to $100,000. The period for each master agreement cannot exceed two years, including all renewal periods. This act is identical to SB 827 (2025) and substantially similar to SB 789 (2025) and HB 167 (2025).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/12/2026

SB1641 Authorizes private school students to participate in extracurricular activities at public schools under certain conditions
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SB 1641 - Under this act, a private school student may participate in an extracurricular activity offered by a local public school or charter school if the activity is not offered by the private school in which the student is enrolled.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/12/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1648 Modifies provisions relating to the Missouri Charter Public School Commission
Sponsor Sen. Doug Beck (D)
Summary
SB 1648 - Currently, the Missouri Charter Public School Commission is an independent commission with nine members appointed by the Governor. This act provides that the Missouri Charter Public School Commission shall be housed within the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, and the members of the Commission shall be appointed by the State Board of Education.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/12/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1653 Establishes new accountability measures for public schools, charter schools, and school districts
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SCS/SBs 1653 & 1194 - This act repeals provisions relating to annual report cards for elementary and secondary schools and establishes new accountability measures for all public schools, charter schools, and school districts. In addition to providing information about student performance, the report cards shall be designed to satisfy federal reporting requirements and shall be presented in a standardized, clear, and easily accessible form so that they can be easily understood by parents, taxpayers, school personnel, legislators, and the media. The State Board of Education may assign duties specified in the act to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) or contract with a third party under state law. By September 15 of each year, the State Board of Education shall provide a confidential version of the school accountability report cards to each school district, public school, and charter school. Within 36 hours of the delivery of the embargoed report cards, the report cards shall be published on the DESE website in a clear and easily accessible location, and by September 30 of each year, the report cards shall be published in a clear and easily accessible location on each school or district website. The State Board of Education shall assign each school district, public school, and charter school a letter grade rating of A-F based on a 0-100 scale, where an "A" rating represents excellent student outcomes, a "B" rating represents more than satisfactory outcomes, a "C" rating represents satisfactory outcomes, a "D" rating represents less than satisfactory outcomes, and an "F" rating represents a failure to produce adequate outcomes. A school district, public school, or charter school that does not test at least 95% of its students in the annual summative assessment shall have its rating lowered by one level. DESE shall use a criteria-referenced growth measure, called "growth to proficiency", in addition to the existing normative value-added growth measure. Growth to proficiency shall evaluate for each student with two consecutive years of Missouri Assessment Program performance levels whether that student has made sufficient academic progress to put such student on a trajectory to reach grade-level proficiency within three years or by 10th grade, whichever comes first. The act describes the factors that shall be used in determining a school's or a school district's A-F rating. These factors include students' academic achievement status, academic growth, and, for high schools, the four-year graduation rate and a success ready graduate measure to be calculated by DESE based upon factors including students' achievement of Advanced Placement scores of 3 or higher, International Baccalaureate scores of 4 or higher, dual enrollment course completions with a "C" grade or higher, and career and technical education certificates, as provided in the act. For schools serving students in grades below 9th grade, academic achievement level shall represent 40% of the rating, value-added growth shall represent 30% of the rating, and growth to proficiency shall represent 30% of the rating. For high schools, academic achievement level shall represent 25% of the rating, value-added growth shall represent 25% of the rating, growth to proficiency shall represent 25% of the rating, the success ready graduate measure shall represent 15% of the rating, and the student four-year graduation rate shall represent 10% percent of the rating. School districts, public schools, and charter schools shall also report, for high schools, the number of graduates who, within six months of graduation, attend postsecondary education or training programs, serve in the military or in national or community service, or are employed in a skilled workforce position as determined by a governmental agency or non-governmental organization with expertise in such positions. DESE shall additionally develop a statewide report card that provides the percentages of students attending schools with each grade rating and student performance on the MAP test relative to student performance on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The A-F grading scale for schools shall automatically increase to ensure rigor in the calculation such that when success is achieved, the following school year, expectations are raised so performance does not stagnate. Specifically, when 65% percent of schools earn an A or a B, the following school year, the school grading scale shall increase by five percentage points to earn an A, B, C, and D. A special school district or state-operated school in which all of the students enrolled are students with disabilities shall be exempt from state requirements relating to school accountability report cards. This act is similar to HB 2539 (2026) and HB 2710 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/31/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SB1655 Modifies the composition of the State Tax Commission
Sponsor Sen. Stephen Webber (D)
Summary
SB 1655 - Current law provides that the State Tax Commission shall be composed of three members, with no more than two members from the same political party. This act increases the number of commissioners to five, with no more than three members from the same political party. This act is identical to SB 1110 (2026).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1656 Authorizes a state sales tax exemption for food
Sponsor Sen. Stephen Webber (D)
Summary
SB 1656 - Current law taxes retail sales of food, as defined in current law, at a rate of one percent. This act provides that retail sales of food shall be exempt from state sales taxes. This act is identical to SB 688 (2025), SB 734 (2025), and SCS/SB 161 (2023), and to a provision in SB 57 (2025) and SCS/HCS/HB 154 (2023), and is substantially similar to SB 659 (2025), HB 345 (2025), HB 432 (2025), HB 872 (2025), HB 1587 (2025), HB 1418 (2024), HB 1464 (2024), HB 2174 (2024), HB 260 (2023), HB 452 (2023), HB 591 (2023), HB 896 (2023), HCS#2/HB 1992 (2022), HB 1817 (2022), and HB 2530 (2022), and to a provision in HB 1029 (2025), HB 2815 (2024), HB 2887 (2024), HB 377 (2023), HCS/HBs 876, 771, 676 & 551 (2023), HB 1136 (2023), HB 1779 (2022), and HB 2249 (2022).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/12/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1662 Modifies provisions relating to early childhood education taxes
Sponsor Sen. Karla May (D)
Summary
SB 1662 - This act provides that current law relating to the distribution of sales tax proceeds in St. Louis County shall not apply to a tax for the purpose of funding early childhood educational services, and requires that such proceeds shall be deposited in the county's Early Childhood Education Fund, which is created by the act. (Section 67.547) This act also requires the proceeds of any tax imposed for the purposes of improving the quality, affordability, and access to early childhood development programs for children aged five years and younger to be deposited into the county or city Early Childhood Education Fund. The administrative control and management of such funds shall be by the board of directors responsible for the administration of a city or county Community Children's Services Fund. The board of directors shall use or disburse the funds in the Early Childhood Education Fund to provide and administer programs subsidizing the cost of providing early childhood education, prioritizing children in financial need. Financial assistance may be used for early childhood education and child care provided by public, private, not-for-profit, and for-profit entities licensed, contracted to receive child care subsidies, or otherwise registered by the Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, including preschools, childcare centers, nursery schools, local education agencies, charter schools, Head Start and Early Head Start programs, informal childcare providers and independent and system-affiliated family child care homes, as described in the act. (Section 67.5420) This act is substantially similar to HB 2379 (2026), HB 3149 (2026), and SB 20 (2025), and is similar to SB 1447 (2024) and HB 373 (2023).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/16/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1667 Modifies provisions relating to public labor organizations
Sponsor Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1667 - This act creates new provisions relating to the bargaining process over labor agreements between public labor organizations and public bodies. Within 30 days after a labor organization has been designated as the exclusive bargaining representative for the public employees in a bargaining unit the bargaining process must begin with representatives of the public body and representatives of the labor organization meeting and bargaining in good faith, as that term is defined in the act, for an agreement covering the wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment for the public employees within the bargaining unit. The labor organization and the public body shall engage in good faith bargaining with each other's designated representatives. In the event that an agreement cannot be reached within 180 days after a labor organization is designated as exclusive bargaining representative for the public employees in a bargaining unit, the dispute shall be referred to mediation. If, after 90 days, mediation has not been successful then the matter shall be referred to arbitration as described below. At any time during the bargaining process, if either the labor organization or the public body determines an impasse has been reached over wages, benefits, hours, or other terms and conditions of employment, the party may submit the matter to interest arbitration. If the parties agree that an impasse has been reached, within seven days of such decision the public body and labor organization shall attempt to agree upon an impartial arbitrator to resolve the impasse. If an arbitrator cannot be agreed upon within such time period then the party that made the initial determination of impasse shall request a panel of seven arbitrators from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services or the American Arbitration Association in the event that Federal Mediation and Conciliation Services cannot produce a panel of seven arbitrators. The parties shall alternate striking from the panel one arbitrator at a time until a single arbitrator is left, with the party that made the initial determination of impasse striking first. Once an arbitrator has been selected, the parties shall proceed to present their arguments. Within 45 days the arbitrator shall submit its decision. The decision of the arbitrator shall be binding upon the parties, provided that any provision that would require the enactment of law for its implementation shall not be binding until such time as the law is enacted. If, at any time during the bargaining process for an initial contract or for successor contracts, either the labor organization or public body believes the opposing party has engaged in bad faith bargaining in violation of this act it may submit the matter to the State Board of Mediation for determination. If the Board determines a party has engaged in bad faith bargaining in violation of this act it shall refer the matter to interest arbitration in accordance with this act. At no time after a labor organization has been designated as the exclusive bargaining representative for the public employees in a bargaining unit or after an agreement covering the wages, benefits, and other terms and conditions of employment for public employees within a bargaining unit has expired shall the public body make any unilateral changes to wages, benefits, or other terms and conditions of employment subject to mandatory bargaining. Any such unilateral changes shall be considered a failure to bargain in good faith. In the event that the labor organization believes that the public body has made unilateral changes to wages, benefits, or other terms and conditions of employment subject to mandatory bargaining, the labor organization may seek declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and monetary damages arising from the unlawful unilateral change in an appropriate state or federal court. This act is substantially similar to SB 1529 (2026).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/16/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-General Laws

SB1668 Establishes the Missouri Innovation, Public Safety, and Accountability Act
Sponsor Sen. Kurtis Gregory (R)
Summary
SB 1668 - This act establishes the "Missouri Innovation, Public Safety, and Accountability Act". The act authorizes a city to submit an innovation district master plan to the Department of Economic Development for the establishment of an innovation district. The master plan shall include the geographic boundaries, identification of vacant or underutilized property, public safety and infrastructure priorities, a general strategy for surplus or incremental state revenues, and high-level projections of anticipated housing units, jobs, business, and population impacts. The Department's authority to approve or deny an application shall be limited to determining whether the geographic boundaries are reasonable. All other application information shall be considered informational and not subject to approval, modification, or denial by the Department. The Department shall adopt and administer a single, standardized master scorecard to evaluate incentives for projects located within an innovation district. The scorecard shall establish uniform criteria, provide predictability and transparency, rank projects based on measurable outcomes, establish intermediate incentive tiers for projects that do not meet full eligibility, and assign project applications to incentive tiers based on the master scorecard. The scorecard shall include categories as described in the act. An application for incentives shall be approved or denied by a reviewing authority within forty-five calendar days. Failure to issue a determination shall result in approval of the application. (Section 620.6000) A city establishing an innovation district shall establish a fast track permitting process for projects located within the district, including the designation of a single, empowered point of contact that is authorized to coordinate reviews and issue binding determinations on behalf of all relevant departments, agencies, and offices. The city shall waive, reduce, or defer discretionary, duplicative, or extraordinary permit and development fees for projects within the district. For properties not subject to an existing tax increment financing plan or property tax abatement, fifty percent of the incremental increase in real property tax revenues generated after designation shall be deposited into the innovation district's public safety fund. The city shall adopt policies providing building code flexibility for adaptive reuse projects, as described in the act. The Department shall prepare and submit a biennial written report to the General Assembly summarizing the performance of the innovation district program, as described in the act. (Section 620.6003) The act establishes the "Rural Missouri Development Fund" for the purpose of supporting economic development, infrastructure, housing, workforce development, and related community-building activities in rural and smaller communities in the state. Any municipality in the top five percent of assessed valuation in the state and that has an innovation district shall deposit ten percent of new property tax revenues into the Rural Missouri Development Fund. Such funds shall be awarded to rural and smaller municipalities, and regional development organizations. The moneys shall be used for rural education, public infrastructure improvements, public safety, housing development, workforce development, and health care community service facilities. (Section 620.6006) The act establishes the "Innovation District Public Safety Fund", which shall be composed of fifty percent of net new state tax receipts generated in the innovation district. Moneys in the fund shall be used for capital or operating expenditures related to public safety and public realm improvements within the district. A project sponsor may apply to the Department for a construction-phase withholding advance. If the application meets all technical requirements, the Department shall disburse the construction-phase withholding advance. (Section 620.6009) For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, any person who is not a resident of this state and that establishes a primary residence within an innovation zone shall be eligible for an income tax exclusion. (Section 620.2012) The act authorizes an employer to enter into a withholding agreement with the Department for the retention of a portion of withholding taxes of employees located within an innovation district. The Department may establish aggregate or annual program caps by rule to manage fiscal exposure. Retained withholdings shall be used solely for qualifying reinvestment expenditures, as defined in the act. (Section 620.2015) For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, the act authorizes an eligible employer to claim a tax credit in an amount equal to $5,000 per eligible employee for relocation expenses incurred in moving such employee from out of the state into an innovation zone. (Section 620.2018) For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, the act authorizes a taxpayer to claim a tax credit in an amount equal to twenty-five percent of conversion expenditures incurred for converting nonresidential property into residential property. The tax credit may be claimed against the taxpayer's income tax liability or sales tax liability. (Section 620.2021) The act authorizes a city to establish a Missouri Opportunity Zone, which shall be conterminous with the innovation district boundaries. A taxpayer may elect to defer payment of state income taxes if such income tax liability is invested in a qualified Missouri Opportunity Zone investment, as defined in the act. This act shall sunset on August 28, 2036, unless reauthorized by the General Assembly. This act is identical to HB 3231 (2026).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
04/16/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SB1700 Requires school districts and charter schools to install master key boxes at public schools and charter schools on or before July 1, 2028
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 1700 - On or before July 1, 2028, this act requires each school district and charter school to install at least one "master key box", as such term is defined in current law, at each school. Each master key box shall be installed at an appropriate location to permit law enforcement officers emergency access to each building and room on school grounds. The school district or charter school shall determine the precise location of each master key box after consultation with local law enforcement agencies, and shall provide local law enforcement agencies with a key or access code that permits access to the contents of the master key box. Each master key box shall contain certain items specified in the act, such as keys to each building and room on school grounds and accurate maps labeling access points, locations of critical emergency response aids, and the areas around each building. The contents of a master key box and the information contained therein shall not be a public record and shall not be made available for public examination. An employee of a school district or charter school is immune from civil liability for damages arising out of the installation and use of master key boxes unless the employee acted with gross negligence or bad faith.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1703 Establishes the "Student Screen-Time Standards Act" and the "Framework on Classroom Use of Screens (FOCUS) Council" regarding instructional methods in elementary schools
Sponsor Sen. Jill Carter (R)
Summary
SB 1703 - This act establishes the "Student Screen-Time Standards Act" and requires each school district and charter school to adopt a written policy governing screen time and the use of instructional technology for students in kindergarten through grade five. The policy shall be designed to promote students' educational interests, prevent harmful effects of excessive screen time on child development, ensure that technology supports rather than supplants foundational learning, and restore evidence-based practices. The act outlines required components of the policy, including limits on student screen time, restrictions on the use of school-issued devices, and limits on student access to internet-connected instructional technology, including laptops, tablets, software platforms, and other similar devices. The policy shall identify approved digital platforms, establish standards for student use of hands-on physical learning tools and traditional materials, outline procedures by which parents may obtain information regarding their child's screen time and technology use and limit such use, and describe the research and evidence upon which the policy is based. In developing the policy, each school district or charter school shall consider and document research on best practices in literacy instruction, instructional technology, assessment, and the role of handwriting and cursive writing in promoting literacy. Each elementary school shall notify parents and guardians annually of the adopted policy, provide parents available information regarding their child's login time and technology use upon request, and publish the policy on the school's website. Each policy shall be periodically updated and shall incorporate recommendations from a model school board policy to be developed by the "Framework on Classroom Use of Screens (FOCUS) Council" established in the act. The policy shall be implemented before the end of the 2027–28 school year and shall apply in all subsequent school years. The Literacy Advisory Council established under current law shall provide advice regarding instruction and assessment of cursive writing and reading, and shall develop recommendations for a related model policy on cursive. The Commissioner of Education shall establish a "Framework on Classroom Use of Screens (FOCUS) Council" composed of the Commissioner as chair, with appointed members representing school boards and charter schools; elementary school principals who have completed state leadership training; teachers with expertise in reading, mathematics, and special education; parental and disability advocacy organizations; faculty from approved teacher preparation programs; a licensed pediatric mental health professional or board-certified behavior analyst; and a medical professional with expertise in child health and development. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education shall provide staff and resources for the council. The council shall conduct a comprehensive survey and analysis of screen time and instructional technology use in public schools, and shall provide guidance on best practices and policies, as provided in the act. By July 1, 2027, the council shall submit a report containing the council's recommendations and a model school board policy on screen time and instructional technology use to the State Board of Education, the Governor, and the Joint Committee on Education. The report shall be updated at least every two years. This act is identical to HCS/HBs 2230 & 2978 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1710 Requires public high schools to begin mandated instruction no earlier than 8:30 a.m. and establishes the "Missouri Sleep and Education Advisory Task Force"
Sponsor Sen. Tracy McCreery (D)
Summary
SB 1710 - Under this act, no public high school shall begin mandated instruction for students earlier than 8:30 a.m. This requirement shall be in effect at all school districts statewide beginning with the earliest of the commencement of the 2027-28 school year or the expiration of the school district's existing collective bargaining agreement establishing school day start times. A school district experiencing significant hardship as a result of this requirement may apply for a waiver from the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), and DESE shall establish a form that districts may use for this purpose. School districts may coordinate with DESE for assistance with redesigning bus routes or adjusting school schedules to implement the later start time. The act establishes the "Missouri Sleep and Education Advisory Task Force" within DESE. The act lists the members of the task force and describes their manner of appointment by individuals including the Commissioner of Education, the Director of the Department of Health and Senior Services, the Governor, the President Pro Tem of the Senate, the Senate Minority Floor Leader, the Speaker of the House of Representatives, and the House Minority Floor Leader. Members of the task force shall serve terms of four years and may be reappointed. The task force shall collect feedback from among the task force membership and education stakeholders across the state regarding best practices for school start times, taking into account impacts of a later start time on student health, school operations and finances, and the local community. Additionally, the task force shall collect data from school districts across the state on changes in student attendance, tardiness, grades, and disciplinary outcomes before and after the implementation of provisions of the act requiring high schools to begin mandated instruction no earlier than 8:30 a.m. Based on this data, the task force may recommend changes to state law and regulations as needed. On or before December thirty-first of each year, the task force shall submit a report on its findings and recommendations to the Governor, President Pro Tempore of the Senate, Speaker of the House of Representatives, the Joint Committee on Education, the State Board of Education, and the State Board of Health and Senior Services.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1723 Modifies provisions relating to excursion gambling boats
Sponsor Sen. Justin Brown (R)
Summary
SB 1723 - Current law requires excursion gambling boats to pay an admission fee of $2 for each person embarking on the boat, with one dollar deposited in the Gaming Commission Fund and one dollar paid to the home dock city or county. This act increases the fee to $5, and requires one dollar to be remitted to the Missouri Department of Mental Health for services for people with developmental disabilities, as described in the act, and two dollars to be paid to the Veterans Commission Capital Improvement Trust Fund. (Section 313.820) Additionally, current law imposes a tax of 21% on adjusted gross receipts received by excursion gambling boats from gambling games. This act increases such rate of tax to 34% and allows home dock cities and counties to enter into agreements to share revenue obtained from the excursion gambling boats' portion of adjusted gross receipts. (Section 313.822)JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Select Committee on Gaming

SB1727 Modifies provisions relating to property tax payments
Sponsor Sen. Jill Carter (R)
Summary
SB 1727 - Current law provides that property tax payments made by mail shall be deemed paid as of the postmark date stamped on the envelope, and shall not be subject to penalty if the postmark indicates that the payment was mailed prior to January 1. This act provides that payments shall be deemed timely paid if postmarked no later than January 5.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1729 Establishes provisions relating to college and career readiness assessments
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 1729 - Currently, a school district is required to give students the opportunity to take the ACT WorkKeys assessment required for the National Career Readiness Certificate ("WorkKeys"), at no cost to the student, only if the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education directs a state-funded census administration of the ACT assessment or if the school district funds the administration of the ACT assessment. Under this act, a school district shall administer college and career readiness assessments, including a career readiness assessment that leads to a nationally recognized work readiness certificate, in a manner and frequency prescribed by the State Board of Education. Such assessments shall be administered to each student before the student graduates from high school. A career readiness assessment may include WorkKeys. A school district may offer additional college and career readiness assessments, at no cost to the student, by using funds appropriated by the General Assembly for such purpose. Additionally, each public institution of higher education may adopt and implement a policy to use a credential earned through WorkKeys as a transcribable credit toward the attainment of a postsecondary technical degree as recommended by the American Council on Education national guide.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1736 Modifies the calculation of state aid for certain school districts
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SB 1736 - Under this act, certain school districts shall no longer receive hold-harmless state aid payments or Small Schools Grant payments. Additionally, certain school districts shall have their foundation formula payments calculated using a new definition of the term "local effort" that is based on 2024 property values and local revenue from fiscal year 2025, rather than the 2004 property values and fiscal year 2005 revenue as provided under current law. The following school districts shall not receive hold-harmless state aid payments or Small Schools Grant payments: Northwestern, Keytesville, Blackwater, Cooper County, Otterville, Pilot Grove, and Higbee. (Subsection 1) The following school districts shall receive foundation formula payments calculated using a definition of the term "local effort" based on 2024 property values and fiscal year 2025 local revenue receipts, as provided in the act: Prairie Home, Brunswick, New Franklin, and Glasgow. Additionally, these school districts shall not receive state aid under hold harmless adjustments or the Small Schools Grant. (Subsection 2) The following school districts shall receive foundation formula payments calculated using a definition of the term "local effort" based on 2024 property values and fiscal year 2025 local revenue receipts, as provided in the act: Salisbury, Boonville, Fayette, and Westran. None of these school districts shall receive state aid under hold harmless adjustments. (Subsection 3)OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1751 To appropriate money for the expenses, grants, refunds, and distributions of the State Board of Education and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Sponsor Sen. Lincoln Hough (R)
Summary
SB 1751 - Elementary and Secondary Education . Governor Senate GR $ 4,849,076,843 $ 5,064,544,779 FEDERAL 1,498,102,242 1,498,102,242 OTHER 2,210,368,475 2,210,368,475 . ______________ ______________ TOTAL $ 8,557,547,560 $ 8,773,015,496 . House Final GR FEDERAL OTHER . ______________ ______________ TOTAL ADAM KOENIGSFELD
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Appropriations

SB1777 Allows a low-performing school district to enter into a contract with a state-approved entity for the establishment of a "Public School Transformation Campus"
Sponsor Sen. Mary Elizabeth Coleman (R)
Summary
SB 1777 - This act authorizes a low-performing school district to enter into a contract for the establishment of a "Public School Transformation Campus". If a school district is determined to be in the bottom five percent of scores on the Annual Performance Report (APR) or has a recent APR score consistent with an accreditation status of provisionally accredited or unaccredited, such district may contract with the governing body of a charter school that satisfies certain performance and financial criteria or another entity approved by the State Board of Education to operate a struggling school as a "transformation campus". A school district that enters into such a contract shall be exempt from certain state interventions that would normally apply to struggling schools or districts, such as the School Turnaround Act, special administrative boards, the lapse of an unaccredited district, or the transfer of students out of an unaccredited district. Before entering into a transformation contract, a district shall notify the Commissioner of Education of its intent to pursue the contract. The State Board of Education shall promulgate rules concerning how and when this notification shall occur, including certain information provided in the act. The Commissioner shall notify the district within 60 days of receiving all required information whether the proposed contract is approved or rejected. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) shall encourage approved entities to enter into such contracts with school districts. For accountability purposes during the first two years of a transformation, the transformation campus shall be evaluated with an alternate performance status and shall be publicly identified as a transformation campus. Following the first two years of transformation, the State Board of Education shall assign all performance ratings received by other public schools within the district to the transformation campus. DESE may provide, through state and federal funds where allowable, financial incentives to support transformations under this act.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1778 Establishes provisions relating to personal finance curriculum requirements for public school students
Sponsor Sen. Angela Mosley (D)
Summary
SB 1778 - This act establishes provisions relating to personal finance curriculum requirements for public school students. "Personal finance" is defined as a course encompassing financial literacy and the current tools, resources, and disciplines necessary for success in the modern economy. Instruction in financial literacy shall include certain topics specified in the act, such as earning income and understanding paychecks; budgeting and expense management; saving and long-term financial planning; banking and financial services; credit, loans, and interest; responsible credit card use; investing, retirement accounts, and compound interest; fraud prevention and financial safety; taxes and civic financial responsibilities; and the understanding of contracts and major purchases, including housing and automobiles. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) shall convene a work group to develop and recommend academic performance standards for instruction in personal finance. The work group shall include educators, a DESE representative, and up to two representatives from each of the following sectors: banking, entrepreneurship, nonprofit organizations focused on educating young professionals and entrepreneurs, investment, student loans, retirement planning, and insurance. DESE shall determine the total membership of the work group, provided that not less than 25% of the members shall be educators who teach personal finance. The State Board of Education shall adopt and implement academic performance standards relating to personal finance for the 2027–28 school year and all subsequent school years. Such standards shall be reviewed every seven years to ensure they reflect current economic trends and best practices. For the 2027–28 school year and all subsequent school years, each school district shall require every student, after completion of 9th grade, to complete one-half unit of credit in personal finance prior to receiving a high school diploma. A school district may waive this requirement for a student transferring from outside Missouri upon receipt of documentation demonstrating the student's successful completion of a substantially similar course. A school district may also permit a 9th grade student to complete the required credit upon the recommendation of a school counselor, as provided in the act. Certain provisions of state law relating to the development of academic performance standards shall not apply to this act. This act is identical to HB 2867 (2026) and similar to HB 2303 (2026).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1779 Modifies cost of living adjustments for members of the Public School Retirement System and the Public Education Employee Retirement System
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SB 1779 - Current law provides that retired members of the Public School Retirement System ("PSRS") and the Public Education Employee Retirement System ("PEERS") may receive yearly cost of living adjustments on monthly retirement allowances, but the total of the increases granted to a retired member or the beneficiary may not exceed 80% of a member's retirement allowance established at retirement or as previously adjusted. This act provides that the limitation on the total of the increases granted to a retired member or the beneficiary shall be subject to annual increases approved by the Board of Trustees of PSRS/PEERS ("Board") every December 31st, except such increases to the limitation shall not exceed 2% and shall depend on the performance of the system's investments. If the system's investments earn 2% or greater returns in excess of the investment return rate adopted by the Board, then the percentage of retirement allowance for the total of increases granted shall be increased by 2%. The total increases granted to a retired member or beneficiary shall not exceed 80% of the retirement allowance established at retirement or as previously adjusted. If a retired member or beneficiary has already reached the 80% cap, such retired member or beneficiary shall be granted a 2% cost of living adjustment for that year unless the system's investments fail to earn at least 2% of returns in excess of the investment return rate adopted by the Board, in which case the member shall not get a cost of living increase. This 2% cost of living increase shall not be cumulative. This act is identical to HB 2095 (2026) and is similar to SB 709 (2025), HB 329 (2025), and SB 1421 (2024).KATIE O'BRIEN
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026

SB1784 Modifies provisions relating to taxation of property
Sponsor Sen. Adam Schnelting (R)
Summary
SB 1784 - This act modifies provisions relating to taxation of property.TAX BALLOT MEASURE LANGUAGE This act requires an election authority to label property tax ballot measures numerically or alphabetically. (Section 115.240) This provision is substantially similar to a provision in SB 1517 (2026) and HCS/HB 1790 (2026). This act provides that any ballot measures proposing a new or increased real or personal property tax levy shall include certain information, as described in the act. (Section 115.706)ASSESSMENT OF SHORT-TERM RENTALS This act modifies the definition of "residential property" for the purposes of the taxation of real property by providing that such definition shall include single family homes that are owned by a sole proprietor, individual, partnership, or limited liability company and leased, in whole or in part, for a term of less than thirty consecutive days. (Section 137.016) This provision is identical to SCS/SBs 1066 & 1088 (2026) and SCS/HB 1086 (2025), and is substantially similar to SB 1303 (2026), SB 699 (2025), and SB 784 (2025), and to a provision in HB 660 (2025).REAL PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS Current law provides that the burden of proof to sustain a property valuation shall be on the assessor for any assessment of residential real property that is made by a computer, computer-assisted method, or a computer program. This act applies such provision to all non-agricultural real property. (Section 137.115.1(5)) Current law requires an assessor to conduct a physical inspection prior to increasing the assessed value of residential real property by more than 15%. This act applies such provision to all non-agricultural real property and requires such physical inspections to be conducted prior to July 1. The act also prohibits any increase in the assessed value of real property of more than 15% over a two-year reassessment cycle and requires any increases of 15% to be spread over the two-year cycle, as described in the act. (Section 137.115.10 to .12) Current law requires assessors to provide notice to taxpayers when the valuation of the taxpayer's real property has increased. This act requires an assessor to provide any third party documents, reports, or other data that was relied upon in the computation of assessed value. (Sections 137.180 and 137.355) These provisions are identical to SB 1521 (2026) and SB 787 (2025), and to provisions in SCS/SB 85 (2025) and HB 780 (2025), and are substantially similar to provisions in HB 1582 (2025).APPEALS OF PROPERTY ASSESSMENTS This act provides that any appeal of an assessment involving an increase of more than fifteen percent that is not disposed of by the board of equalization by September 30 shall be dismissed and the assessor's increased assessed valuation shall be void. (Section 138.010) Current law provides that a taxpayer shall prevail in any appeal of an assessed valuation for which an assessor fails to provide evidence of a required physical inspection. This act provides that, in such cases, the increased assessed valuation shall be void. This act also provides that if a taxpayer submits a written appraisal report certified by the Missouri Real Estate Appraisers Commission at least five days in advance of a board of equalization hearing, the value of the property as determined in the appraisal report shall presumptively determine the property's true value in money. (Section 138.060) This act provides that if a transfer of ownership of real property occurs after January 1 of a non-reassessment year, the new owner shall be entitled to appeal the assessed value of such property directly to the State Tax Commission by no later than December 31 of such year, regardless of whether the previous owner appealed the value of the property during the previous reassessment year. (Section 138.135) The act provides that if an assessor appeals a decision of the State Tax Commission on any grounds other than overvaluation and the taxpayer is the prevailing party, the taxpayer shall be awarded costs of appeal and attorney's fees. (Section 138.430) Current law authorizes any first class charter county or city not within a county to require, by ordinance or charter, the reimbursement of just and reasonable appraisal costs, attorney fees, and court costs resulting from hearings before the State Tax Commission for taxpayer appeals of property assessments. This act requires such reimbursements. This act also increases the maximum amount of fees to be reimbursed from $1,000 to $5,000 for residential property appeals, and from $4,000 to $5,000 for utility, industrial railroad, or other subclass three property appeals. (Section 138.434)STATE TAX COMMISSION This act provides that when the State Tax Commission equalizes the valuation of a class or subclass of property that results in an increase of more than fifteen percent, such increase shall be evenly divided between each of the successive reassessment cycles in a manner that does not cause an increase of more than fifteen percent for any two-year assessment cycle. (Section 138.390)PROTESTED PROPERTY TAXES Current law requires a taxpayer to file a written protest of property taxes with the collector at the same time such taxpayer makes full payment of such taxes. This act repeals such requirement. This act also provides that the interest due to a taxpayer whose protested taxes were distributed to a taxing authority shall be calculated from the date that the protested taxes were distributed to the taxing authority through the date of the refund. Any taxpayer determined by a circuit court or the State Tax Commission to be entitled to a refund of property taxes shall receive such refund from the collector within thirty days of the final determination of the refund amount by the circuit court or State Tax Commission. If such refund is not issued within thirty days, the taxpayer shall be entitled to interest on the refund as calculated under current law. (Section 139.031) These provisions are identical to provisions in SB 1522 (2026). This act is identical to HCS/HB 2178 (2026).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1790 Modifies provisions relating to the calculation of property tax levies
Sponsor Sen. Jason Bean (R)
Summary
SB 1790 - This act effectively reduces the tax rate paid by all existing property owners when a data center is built by creating a mandatory rate reduction mechanism.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SB1796 Creates provisions relating to personal information of public school teachers
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SB 1796 - Under this act, a public school teacher's personally identifiable information shall not be sold or disclosed by any public school, school district, or third-party entity to any party for any commercial use. Additionally, a background check conducted on a public school teacher for purposes relating to such teacher's work-related travel or transportation of students for educational purposes shall not be reported, transmitted, or otherwise treated as a credit inquiry or have any effect on the teacher's credit score.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1800 Creates provisions relating to expressive activity at postsecondary educational institutions
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SB 1800 - This act creates provisions relating to expressive activity at postsecondary educational institutions. The act defines a "postsecondary educational institution" as including any approved Missouri public institution of postsecondary education under the Access Missouri Financial Assistance Program. Every student of a postsecondary educational institution who receives state student financial aid shall be deemed by such receipt to have agreed to observe the rules and regulations promulgated by the governing authority of the postsecondary educational institution. Subject to administrative review and hearing procedures described in the act, any student who receives state student financial aid in connection with his or her matriculation and who, while on the campus of the postsecondary educational institution, engages in materially and substantially disruptive conduct and is convicted of a crime or found by the institution to have violated any code of conduct as a result of such disruptive behavior shall be ineligible for state student financial aid for a period not to exceed the ensuing two academic years. Each postsecondary educational institution shall adopt a policy detailing students' rights and responsibilities regarding expressive activities at the institution. The policy shall allow students to engage in expressive activities on campus, including by responding to the expressive activities of others, and to invite speakers to campus. The policy shall prohibit using a device to amplify sound while engaging in expressive activities on campus during class hours. The policy shall further prohibit, during the last two weeks of a semester or term, engaging in certain expressive activities described in the act, such as using a device to amplify sound or using a drum or other percussive equipment. The policy shall also prohibit camping or erecting tents on campus; wearing a mask with the intent to obstruct law enforcement or intimidate others; lowering the institution's United States flag or Missouri state flag with the intent to raise the flag of another nation or a flag representing an organization or group of people; or engaging in expressive activities on campus between the hours of 10 p.m. and 8 a.m. The policy shall establish disciplinary sanctions for students, student organizations, or employees who unduly interfere with the expressive activities of others on campus or violate an institution policy or state law. The policy shall include a grievance procedure; require students to present proof of identity on request by a peace officer; be approved by a majority vote of the institution's governing board before final adoption; and be posted on the institution's website.OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1805 Modifies the calculation of state aid for certain school districts
Sponsor Sen. Patty Lewis (D)
Summary
SB 1805 - Under this act, certain school districts shall no longer receive hold-harmless state aid payments or Small Schools Grant payments. Additionally, certain school districts shall have their foundation formula payments calculated using a new definition of the term "local effort" that is based on 2024 property values and local revenue from fiscal year 2025, rather than the 2004 property values and fiscal year 2005 revenue as provided under current law. The following school districts shall not receive hold-harmless state aid payments or Small Schools Grant payments: Northwestern, Keytesville, Blackwater, Cooper County, Otterville, Pilot Grove, and Higbee. (Subsection 1) The following school districts shall receive foundation formula payments calculated using a definition of the term "local effort" based on 2024 property values and fiscal year 2025 local revenue receipts, as provided in the act: Prairie Home, Brunswick, New Franklin, and Glasgow. Additionally, these school districts shall not receive state aid under hold harmless adjustments or the Small Schools Grant. (Subsection 2) The following school districts shall receive foundation formula payments calculated using a definition of the term "local effort" based on 2024 property values and fiscal year 2025 local revenue receipts, as provided in the act: Salisbury, Boonville, Fayette, and Westran. None of these school districts shall receive state aid under hold harmless adjustments. (Subsection 3)OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SB1808 Authorizes legislation with a subject to be determined at a later date
Sponsor Sen. Tony Luetkemeyer (R)
Summary
SB 1808 - This act proposes a bill relating to law with the subject to be determined at a later date.JIM ERTLE
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026

SJR66 Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Mike Cierpiot (R)
Summary
SJR 66 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the amount by which the tax liability actually owed on real property may increase over the tax liability owed on such property during the previous year may be limited by law. Any limits authorized pursuant to this amendment may include limits on the actual tax liability owed or limits on increases made to the assessed value of such property. This constitutional amendment is identical to SJR 62 (2025), is substantially similar to SJR 39 (2022), SJR 12 (2021), HJR 13 (2021), SCS/SJRs 48, 41, & 43 (2020), HJR 85 (2020), and HJR 123 (2020), and is similar to HJR 81 (2020) and HJR 88 (2020).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR68 Prohibits the taxation of unrealized gains
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SCS/SJRs 68 & 96 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits any taxes from being imposed on any unrealized gains accrued on any asset prior to the sale of such asset. This amendment is identical to SJR 53 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026
S - Voted Do Pass as substituted - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SJR69 Amends the Constitution to assert the right of parents to participate in and direct the education of their children free from government interference
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SJR 69 - This proposed constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the government shall not deny or infringe upon a parent's fundamental right to participate in and direct the education of his or her child, including, but not limited to, the right to home school or otherwise educate a child outside of the public school system free from government regulation, regardless of whether the parent receives financial assistance from the government for purposes of educating a child; the right to access the curricula and lesson plans of the public school and school district in which a child is enrolled; the right to educate a child in a public school that does not teach students or train teachers on critical race theory or diversity-equity-inclusion; and the right to educate a child in a public school that is not required to conform its curriculum to statewide learning standards, as provided in the amendment. This proposed constitutional amendment is substantially similar to SJR 6 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SJR70 Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SJR 70 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the assessed value of residential real property shall be the most recent assessment. For all subsequent reassessments of such residential real property, the assessed value shall not increase while the owner or owners continue to own such property. Residential real property that is purchased, newly constructed, or undergoes a change in ownership shall be reassessed at its true value in money as provided by law, after which the assessed value of such property shall not increase while the new owner or owners continue to own such property. The assessed value of residential real property shall reflect the value added to the property as a result of new construction or improvements, as described in the act. This amendment is identical to SJR 50 (2025) and SJR 54 (2025), is substantially similar to SJR 34 (2025), HCS/HJR 4 (2025), HJR 86 (2025), HJR 89 (2025), SJR 90 (2024), and HCS#2/HJR 78 (2024), and is similar to HJR 85 (2024), HJR 120 (2024), HJR 184 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SJR73 Establishes the Missouri Homestead Act
Sponsor Sen. Mike Moon (R)
Summary
SJR 73 - This constitutional amendment establishes the "Missouri Homestead Act". For all tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, this constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, authorizes a taxpayer to claim an exemption from real property taxes imposed on the taxpayer's homestead, as such terms are defined in the amendment. To be eligible for a tax exemption, the homestead shall not be encumbered by a mortgage lien, the taxpayer shall not be delinquent on any state or local taxes, and the taxpayer shall prospectively pay five year's worth of property taxes owed on the homestead. To claim an exemption, the taxpayer shall provide notice to the collector by September 1. Upon filing the notice and providing evidence that the taxpayer satisfies all requirements, the homestead shall be exempt from property taxation for as long as the taxpayer owns the homestead. An exemption shall be void if the taxpayer sells or otherwise disposes of the property such that it no longer qualifies as a homestead, or by the taxpayer notifying the collector that the taxpayer wishes to void the exemption. The amendment imposes a state sales tax at a rate of 0.1%, with the revenues deposited in the "Homestead Preservation Fund", which is established by the amendment. Moneys in the fund shall stand appropriated and shall be used solely to reimburse taxing jurisdictions for revenue lost as a result of tax exemptions authorized by the amendment, as described in the amendment. The amendment provides for further rights to taxpayers owning a homestead and receiving a property tax exemption pursuant to the amendment, including the right to possess the homestead, to exclude others from the homestead, to enjoy the fruits and profits of the homestead, and to convey the homestead, as described in the amendment.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
02/18/2026

SJR74 Modifies provisions relating to income taxes
Sponsor Sen. Doug Beck (D)
Summary
SJR 74 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that, in the event that the General Assembly reduces the rate of income tax for state purposes below the rate of 4.5%, every county in the state shall be authorized to impose an income tax on the residents of such county, provided that the total combined rate of such tax and the state income tax does not exceed 4.5% The taxable income for the purposes of the county income tax shall be a taxpayer's Missouri taxable income for state purposes, and the Department of Revenue shall perform all functions incident to the administration, collection, enforcement, and operation of the tax. All taxes collected pursuant to this amendment shall be deposited in the "County Income Tax Trust Fund" and shall be considered nonstate funds, but shall not commingled with any funds of the state or be subject to appropriation by the General Assembly.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SJR75 Places limits on increases of the assessment of certain properties
Sponsor Sen. Barbara Washington (D)
Summary
SJR 75 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the assessed valuation for any residential real property located in a subdivision located adjacent to a subdivision receiving a tax abatement shall not be increased for the duration of time that the adjacent subdivision receives such abatement. This amendment is identical to SJR 12 (2025), SJR 65 (2024), SJR 36 (2023), SJR 42 (2022), SJR 17 (2021), and HJR 74 (2020).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR77 Authorizes a property tax exemption for disabled veterans
Sponsor Sen. Angela Mosley (D)
Summary
SJR 77 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, expands the current exemption from real property taxes for former prisoners of war with a total service-connected disability to all disabled veterans, as defined in the amendment, including surviving spouses of deceased disabled veterans. This amendment is identical to SCS/SJR 14 (2025), SS/SJR 46 (2025), and HJR 6 (2025), and is substantially similar to HJR 41 (2025), HJR 64 (2025), HJR 66 (2025), HJR 74 (2025), HJR 96 (2025), SJR 58 (2024), SJR 84 (2024), HCS/HJR 75 (2024), HJR 95 (2024), HJR 118 (2024), SJR 16 (2023), HCS/HJRs 7 & 11 (2023), HCS/HJR 52 (2023), HJR 57 (2023), SCS/SJR 40 (2022), HJR 72 (2022), HJR 73 (2022), HJR 86 (2022), HJR 89 (2022), HJR 115 (2022), HJR 119 (2022), HJR 140 (2022), HJR 3 (2021), HJR 32 (2021), HJR 63 (2021), SJR 23 (2018), SJR 34 (2018), HJR 63 (2018), and HJR 57 (2018).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR80 Modifies provisions relating to tax credits
Sponsor Sen. Travis Fitzwater (R)
Summary
SJR 80 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, authorizes the General Assembly to provide for an income tax credit for contributions made to agencies that provide support to pregnant and new mothers, born and unborn children, and their families, including nonprofit pregnancy resource centers, provided that any law authorizing such contributions shall not allow for tax credits to be authorized by an entity that performs, induces, or refers for abortions or holds itself out as performing, inducing, or referring for abortions. This amendment is identical to a provision in SJR 17 (2025) and SJR 87 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Families, Seniors and Health

SJR83 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SJR 83 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the rate of income tax imposed by the General Assembly shall not exceed 4.7%.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SJR84 Eliminates property taxes on personal property
Sponsor Sen. Nick Schroer (R)
Summary
SJR 84 - Beginning January 1, 2028, this constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that no county or other political subdivision shall be authorized to levy or collect a tax on any personal property. This amendment is substantially similar to SJR 44 (2020).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR88 Authorizes a property tax exemption for disabled veterans
Sponsor Sen. Jill Carter (R)
Summary
SJR 88 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, expands the current exemption from real property taxes for former prisoners of war with a total service-connected disability to all disabled veterans, as defined in the amendment, including surviving spouses of deceased disabled veterans. This amendment is identical to SS/SJR 46 (2025), SCS/SJR 14 (2025), and HJR 6 (2025), and is substantially similar to HJR 41 (2025), HJR 64 (2025), HJR 66 (2025), HJR 74 (2025), HJR 96 (2025), SJR 58 (2024), SJR 84 (2024), HCS/HJR 75 (2024), HJR 95 (2024), HJR 118 (2024), SJR 16 (2023), HCS/HJRs 7 & 11 (2023), HCS/HJR 52 (2023), HJR 57 (2023), SCS/SJR 40 (2022), HJR 72 (2022), HJR 73 (2022), HJR 86 (2022), HJR 89 (2022), HJR 115 (2022), HJR 119 (2022), HJR 140 (2022), HJR 3 (2021), HJR 32 (2021), HJR 63 (2021), SJR 23 (2018), SJR 34 (2018), HJR 63 (2018), and HJR 57 (2018).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR89 Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Sponsor Sen. Jill Carter (R)
Summary
SJR 89 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the assessed value of residential real property shall be the most recent assessment. For all subsequent reassessments of such residential real property, the assessed value shall not increase while the owner or owners continue to own such property. Residential real property that is purchased, newly constructed, or undergoes a change in ownership shall be reassessed at its true value in money as provided by law, after which the assessed value of such property shall not increase while the new owner or owners continue to own such property. The assessed value of residential real property shall reflect the value added to the property as a result of new construction or improvements, as described in the act. This amendment is identical to SJR 50 (2025) and SJR 54 (2025), is substantially similar to SJR 34 (2025), HCS/HJR 4 (2025), HJR 86 (2025), HJR 89 (2025), SJR 90 (2024), and HCS#2/HJR 78 (2024), and is similar to HJR 85 (2024), HJR 120 (2024), HJR 184 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR90 Modifies provisions relating to the State Tax Commission
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SJR 90 - This amendment modifies provisions relating to the State Tax Commission. Current constitutional provisions require the State Tax Commission to equalize assessments as between counties. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the Commission shall not have the power to require a county to enter into any agreement or memorandum of understanding for the purpose of increasing or decreasing the assessed valuation of an entire class or subclass of property, or any of any portion thereof other than through an appeal of a decision made by a local board of equalization, and any reimbursements made to a county by the state for the purposes of assessing property shall not be made contingent on entering into any such agreement or memorandum of understanding. The amendment also provides that the Commission shall not utilize the standards promulgated by the International Association of Assessing Officers (IAAO) or any other international or domestic organization to carry out the powers and duties provided by law. This amendment provides that the assessed value of a class or subclass of real or personal property shall not be lower than seventy percent nor more than one hundred percent of the true value in money for such class or subclass, as determined by studies conducted by the Commission. Finally, this amendment establishes the Office of State Ombudsman for Property Assessment and Taxation within the State Tax Commission, and requires the General Assembly to annually provide for a sufficient appropriation to ensure taxpayers receive the assistance needed to comply with and navigate the property tax process.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR91 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SJR 91 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that the rate of income tax imposed by the General Assembly shall not exceed 4.7%.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SJR92 Increases the debt limit for school districts
Sponsor Sen. Mike Henderson (R)
Summary
SJR 92 - This proposed constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, increases the debt limit for school districts from 15% to 20% of the value of the district's taxable tangible property. This proposed constitutional amendment is identical to SJR 58 (2025) and HJR 100 (2025).OLIVIA SHANNON
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
01/27/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Education

SJR94 Authorizes a property tax exemption for disabled veterans
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SJR 94 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, expands the current exemption from real property taxes for former prisoners of war with a total service-connected disability to all disabled veterans, as defined in the amendment, including surviving spouses of deceased disabled veterans. This amendment is identical to SS/SJR 46 (2025), SCS/SJR 14 (2025), and HJR 6 (2025), and is substantially similar to HJR 41 (2025), HJR 64 (2025), HJR 66 (2025), HJR 74 (2025), HJR 96 (2025), SJR 58 (2024), SJR 84 (2024), HCS/HJR 75 (2024), HJR 95 (2024), HJR 118 (2024), SJR 16 (2023), HCS/HJRs 7 & 11 (2023), HCS/HJR 52 (2023), HJR 57 (2023), SCS/SJR 40 (2022), HJR 72 (2022), HJR 73 (2022), HJR 86 (2022), HJR 89 (2022), HJR 115 (2022), HJR 119 (2022), HJR 140 (2022), HJR 3 (2021), HJR 32 (2021), HJR 63 (2021), SJR 23 (2018), SJR 34 (2018), HJR 63 (2018), and HJR 57 (2018).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR95 Establishes the "Show-Me Prosperity Fund"
Sponsor Sen. Adam Schnelting (R)
Summary
SS SCS SJR 95 -- CREATION OF A SOVEREIGN WEALTH FUND FOR THE STATE This constitutional amendment, upon voter approval, establishes the "Show-Me Prosperity Fund", which is established as a permanent public endowment to provide long-term fiscal stability with the goal of eliminating State-imposed taxes without impairing the real value of the Fund's principal. The Fund will consist of money appropriated to it by the General Assembly, and may also receive gifts, donations, grants, and bequests from any source. The State Treasurer must invest the Fund in exchange-traded funds tracking the stock performance of the Standard and Poor's 500 in a manner consistent with fiduciary standards applicable to public trust funds. No money can be appropriated from the Fund until the notification is given by the Treasurer that the net investment earnings of the fund, as defined in the amendment, are sufficient to eliminate state-imposed taxes, at which time net investment earnings from the Fund can be used to eliminate State taxes as provided in the amendment. The total amount of moneys that can be appropriated from the Fund in a fiscal year must not exceed 3% of the average market value of the Fund over the preceding five fiscal years. Upon the elimination of all state-imposed taxes, no such taxes can thereafter be enacted, provided, however, that in the event the Fund is unable to meet its obligations due to insolvency, revenue shortfall, or program failure, the General Assembly must retain full authority to appropriate funds from any lawful source and to enact legislation establishing or increasing taxes or other revenues as necessary to ensure continuity of State programs and fulfillment of State expenditures that were anticipated to be supported by the Fund. Upon the elimination of all state-imposed taxes, the General Assembly can appropriate net investment earnings from the Fund for the purpose of replacing Federal moneys received by the State, for issuing dividend payments to residents of the State, or both. The principal of the Fund must not be appropriated, pledged, or borrowed against. The State Auditor must conduct an audit of the Fund to ensure compliance with the provisions of the amendment at such times that the Auditor deems necessary, but no less than once every three fiscal years.
Progress
Governor
Last Action
05/28/2026
G - Delivered to the Secretary of State

SJR96 Prohibits the taxation of unrealized gains
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SJR 96 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits any taxes from being imposed on any unrealized gains accrued on any asset prior to the sale of such asset. This amendment is identical to SJR 53 (2025).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
03/11/2026
S - Superseded by SJR 68

SJR98 Replaces the property tax on real property with a sales tax
Sponsor Sen. Rick Brattin (R)
Summary
SJR 98 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits counties and political subdivisions from levying or collecting a tax on real property beginning January 1, 2027. In lieu of such property tax, the amendment requires a county to impose a sales tax on the sale of real property at a rate equal to the total combined rate of state and local sales taxes in effect at the location of the property, provided that all revenues generated by the tax are collected and distributed by the county in the same manner as the property tax levied prior to January 1, 2027. A taxpayer shall select whether to remit the tax due upon the transfer of the title of the property, or to remit ten percent of the sales tax due to the county collector upon the transfer of title of the property, and the remainder within five, ten, or fifteen years in equal annual installments. Financial institutions that are mortgage servicers shall pay sales tax obligations which they service from escrow accounts in one payment by the required due date. This amendment also requires a taxpayer who purchases his or her real property prior to January 1, 2027, to remit a tax equal to the total combined rate of state and local sales taxes in effect at the location of the property multiplied by the remaining mortgage balance on such property, provided that all revenues generated by the tax are collected and distributed by the county in the same manner as the property tax levied prior to January 1, 2027. A taxpayer shall select whether to remit the tax due by December 31, 2027, 2032, 2037, or 2042, with such payment made in equal annual installments. Financial institutions that are mortgage servicers shall pay sales tax obligations which they service from escrow accounts in one payment by the required due date. (Section 4(e)) This amendment also modifies a constitutional provision prohibiting sales taxes on transactions that were not subject to tax as of January 1, 2015, by providing an exemption for the sales tax imposed pursuant to the amendment. (Section 26) This amendment is identical to SJR 7 (2025), SJR 82 (2024), SJR 18 (2023), and SJR 59 (2022).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR101 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Mike Moon (R)
Summary
SJR 101 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, establishes the "Ed Emery Act". This amendment repeals state law relating to income and sales taxes and replaces it with rates as provided in the amendment. From January 1, 2029 to January 1, 2031, the individual income tax rate shall not exceed three percent. Beginning January 1, 2031, the individual income tax shall be repealed. From January 1, 2029 to January 1, 2031, the state sales tax shall not exceed five percent except on food, which shall not exceed four percent. Beginning January 1, 2031, the total of the state sales tax, conservation sales tax, and the parks and soils sales tax shall not exceed seven percent except on food, which shall not exceed five and one-half percent. The General Assembly may increase taxes or fees in the event of an emergency. All sales tax revenue shall be deposited into the General Revenue Fund and appropriated by the General Assembly unless otherwise restricted by the constitution, except that a portion of the funds received shall be deposited into the School District Trust Fund. The amount deposited in such fund shall not be less than the average annual amount deposited in the fund for fiscal years 2023-2027. The sales tax shall be imposed on all retail sales of new tangible personal property and all taxable services. All existing sales tax exemptions are repealed, other than those specifically listed in the amendment or those passed by a two-thirds majority of the General Assembly. The amendment requires all local sales tax rates to be recalculated to produce substantially the same amount of revenue as was produced on average for the five year period prior to January 1, 2029. Beginning January 1, 2031, the total of all sales taxes, including local taxes but excluding transportation development districts and community improvement districts, shall not exceed ten percent. Such rate may be exceeded if a local tax is approved by the voters or it is the temporary result of a recalculation of local taxes. This amendment also creates a property tax relief credit equal to fifty percent of the increase in taxes on a homestead to be used on the taxpayer's current property tax bill. To be eligible, the prior year's tax liability on the residence must have increased by more than five percent in a year of general reassessment or by more than two and one-half percent in a year without reassessment. To qualify for the credit, a taxpayer shall be at least sixty-five years of age; have total household income of no more than $75,000, adjusted annually based on the consumer price index; and own a residence of no more than $400,000 in appraised value, adjusted annually based on the consumer price index. Any taxpayer who claims this credit shall not also claim the Senior Citizen Property Tax Credit or any similar credit. This amendment is identical to SJR 56 (2025), SJR 13 (2017), SJR 25 (2016), and SJR 11 (2015), and is similar to SJR 46 (2014), HJR 80 (2014), and HJR 25 (2013).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SJR102 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Jill Carter (R)
Summary
SJR 102 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits any state agency from taking any punitive action for property tax assessments conducted by a county that fall below the upper range of acceptable assessment levels, as such terms are defined in the amendment.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
SJR104 Modifies authority of the state treasurer
Sponsor Sen. Sandy Crawford (R)
Summary
SJR 104 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, modifies the powers of the State Treasurer. Specifically, the State Treasurer is permitted to invest certain state moneys in obligations of the United States government or any agency or instrumentality thereof maturing and becoming payable not more than seven years from the date of purchase, rather than five years as is the case currently. The amendment additionally authorizes the State Treasurer to invest in: • Municipal securities possessing one of the five highest long term ratings or the highest short term rating issued by a nationally recognized rating agency and maturing and becoming payable not more than five years from the date of purchase; and • Other reasonable and prudent financial instruments and securities as otherwise provided by law. This constitutional amendment is identical to the truly agreed to HCS/HJR 35 (2021).SCOTT SVAGERA
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Insurance and Banking

SJR111 Modifies provisions relating to property taxes
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SCS/SJR 111 - Current constitutional provisions require taxing jurisdictions to reduce property tax levies when the total assessed value of property in the taxing jurisdiction increases by more than the percent increase in inflation, with an exception made for levies imposed for the payment of principal and interest on bonds or other indebtedness. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, removes the exemption for debt service levies.   The amendment also provides that, beginning January 1 following the effective date of the amendment, taxing jurisdictions shall calculate levies for each subclass of real property, and shall reduce the levy for any such class if the assessed valuation for such class increases over the previous year, as provided in the amendment.   Additionally, this amendment requires the value of new construction and improvements to be included in the calculation of total assessed valuation for the purpose of calculating property tax levies. (Section 22)   This amendment is substantially similar to HJR 148 (2026). JOSH NORBERG  
Progress
House: In Committee
Last Action
04/08/2026
S - Placed on Informal Calendar

SJR112 Modifies provisions relating to the Blind Pension Fund
Sponsor Sen. Brad Hudson (R)
Summary
SJR 112 - Current constitutional provisions require the General Assembly to impose a property tax of not less than $0.005 or more than $0.03 per $100 assessed valuation for the Blind Pension Fund. This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, repeals such requirement and instead requires the General Assembly to provide for an annual appropriation in an amount not less than the amount appropriated to such fund for the 2027 fiscal year. This amendment is identical to HJR 147 (2026).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Appropriations

SJR113 Modifies provisions relating to property tax assessments
Sponsor Sen. Joe Nicola (R)
Summary
SJR 113 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, provides that, beginning January 1, 2027, the assessed value of residential real property shall be the most recent assessment. For all reassessments of such residential real property, the assessed value shall not increase by more than the increase in the Consumer Price Index or by 4%, whichever is less, provided that the assessed value shall reflect the value added to the property as a result of new construction or improvements, as described in the act. This amendment is identical to HJR 112 (2026), is substantially similar to SJR 34 (2025), SJR 50 (2025), SJR 54 (2025), HCS/HJR 4 (2025), HCS#2/HJR 78 (2024), HJR 86 (2025), HJR 89 (2025), and SJR 90 (2024), and is similar to HJR 85 (2024), HJR 120 (2024), HJR 184 (2024).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
SJR115 Modifies provisions relating to taxation
Sponsor Sen. Curtis Trent (R)
Summary
SJR 115 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, modifies provisions relating to taxation.INCOME TAX This amendment provides that, if all revenue triggers established by the General Assembly for the elimination of the individual income tax are met such that the top rate of tax is reduced below 1.4%, then for any tax year beginning on or after the later of January 1, 2031, or January 1 of the year in which the top rate of tax is reduced below 1.4%, no individual income tax shall be imposed by the state, provided that this provision shall not apply to any earnings tax imposed by a political subdivision or to the income tax imposed on the income of trusts, estates, or fiduciaries thereof, corporations, partnerships, limited liability companies, or any other entity other than real persons.SALES AND USE TAX This amendment authorizes the General Assembly to expand the sales and use tax base to include the ability to tax any goods and services. Beginning January 1, 2029, any county, city, town, or village imposing a sales or use tax at a rate greater than 1%, and any other political subdivision imposing a sales and use tax at a rate greater than 0.5% shall annually adjust one or more of several tax levies imposed by such political subdivision for the purpose of offsetting any additional revenue received from the expansion of the sales and use tax base. The levies that shall be adjusted are the sales and use tax rate, personal property tax levy, residential real property tax levy, or earnings tax rate. Notwithstanding such provision, no adjustment made pursuant to this provision shall result in a reduction in funding to the public schools within or serving such political subdivision. Beginning January 1, 2029, each constitutionally-imposed sales and use tax rate shall be adjusted in a manner provided by law in order to produce substantially the same amount of revenue as the median annual revenue that such tax produced for the three fiscal years ending prior to the preceding calendar year, as adjusted for inflation. The State Auditor shall determine any such adjustments. Any tax or revenue increase resulting from any general law enacted by the General Assembly for the purpose of eliminating the individual income tax, provided that such general law is enacted within three years of the effective date of this amendment, shall be exempt from Hancock limitations and from constitutional provisions relating to motor fuel tax. The Director of Revenue may promulgate rules for the purpose of clarifying and prohibiting the circumvention of the expansion of the sales and use tax base, as well as to define any terms left undefined by general law.JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SJR117 Modifies provisions relating to state revenue
Sponsor Sen. Ben Brown (R)
Summary
SJR 117 - This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, establishes the "Taxpayer Protection Act". This constitutional amendment requires nonrecall petitions and referred measures to be held on a general election, a municipal election, or on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November of odd-numbered years. The amendment authorizes districts to consolidate ballot issues and allows voters to approve delays up to four years in voting on ballot issues, provided that district actions taking during the delay shall not extend beyond that period. The amendment requires a district to mail notice to each active registered elector with specific titles, as described in the amendment. Such notices shall include a summary both for and against the proposal. In addition to existing constitutional requirements for voter approval of new or increased taxes, this amendment requires voter approval for any new tax, tax rate increase, mill levy above the prior year rate, valuation for assessment ratio increase for a property class, extension of an expiring tax, or a tax policy change directly causing a net tax revenue gain to any district. Voter approval shall also be required for the creation of any multiple fiscal year direct or indirect debt or other financial obligation whatsoever without adequate present cash reserves pledged irrevocably and held for payments in all future fiscal years. The amendment requires each district to reserve a portion of its fiscal year spending to be used only for declared emergencies, as described in the amendment. The amendment places a limit on the percentage change in state appropriations equal to inflation plus the percentage change in state population in the prior calendar year, adjusted for any revenue changes approved by voters. The amendment also places a limit on the annual percentage change in a local district fiscal year spending equal to inflation plus local growth. If revenue from sources not excluded from fiscal year spending exceeds the limits in dollars for that fiscal year, the excess shall be refunded in the next fiscal year unless voters approve a revenue change as an offset. Initial district bases shall be current fiscal year spending and property tax collected for tax year 2025. Qualification or disqualification as an enterprise, as defined in the amendment, shall change district bases and future year limits. Future creation of district bonded debt shall increase, and retiring or refinancing district bonded debt shall lower, fiscal year spending and property tax revenue by the annual debt service so funded. Debt service changes, reductions, refunds, and voter-approved revenue changes are dollar amounts that are exceptions to any district base. The amendment prohibits new or increased transfer tax rates on real property. The amendment also prohibits any new state real property tax or local income tax. The amendment authorizes districts to enact cumulative uniform exemptions and credits to reduce or end business personal property taxes. The amendment requires real estate sales prices for past or future sales by a lender or government to be kept as public records. The amendment allows a local district to reduce or end its subsidy to any program delegated to it by the General Assembly for administration. For current programs, the state may require 90 days notice and that the adjustment occur in a maximum of three equal annual installments. This amendment is identical to HJR 169 (2026).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
02/05/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Economic and Workforce Development

SJR120 Establishes the Stop Socialism Act
Sponsor Sen. Patty Lewis (D)
Summary
SJR 120 - This constitutional amendment creates the "Stop Socialism Act". This constitutional amendment, if approved by the voters, prohibits any county from receiving a proportion of total state general revenue appropriations, as defined in the amendment, in excess of the county's proportional contribution of total state income and state sales taxes received by the state for any given fiscal year. Total state general revenue appropriations shall be deemed to be allocated to a county if such moneys are directly appropriated to such county or to a political subdivision within such county, or are in any other way distributed through an agency of the state to any resident taxpayer of such county. If in any given fiscal year a county receives less than its proportional share of total state general revenue appropriations, the difference shall be refunded to the residents of such county pro rata based on state income tax returns filed following the close of such fiscal year. This amendment is identical to SJR 47 (2023).JOSH NORBERG
Progress
Senate: In Committee
Last Action
05/07/2026
S - Referred to committee - Senate-Government Efficiency